6 Amendments of Constance LE GRIP related to 2010/2012(INI)
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Stresses the importance of making full use of the potential of e-commerce as part of making the EU more competitive on the global level;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for standardisation of pre- contractual information in e-commerce, while retaining a minimum harmonisation approach for face-to-face contractsdistance selling, particularly e-commerce, to be standardised at a high level of consumer protection to the extent that such harmonisation can be adapted to the advent of new forms of distance selling, and calls for a minimum harmonisation approach to be retained for distance selling in specific sectors, such as health services or estate agents;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for uniformisation of specific rules and practices to allow distance traders and direct sellers, particularly those in e-commerce, to move beyond their national borders in the guarantees and liability offered;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for a harmonisaton the Commission ofand the rules on unfair contractMember States to identify the criteria constituting unfair terms so as to establish a single EU-wide clause on unfairness so as to ensure that national authorities and courts follow the same standards when assessing contract clauses;definition of unfairness.
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls for clearer and improved horizontala single legal instruments and combining the hvarmonisation of certain aspects of consumer contract law; consiious texts currently in force in orders that this should include other directives, such as those on distance selling of financial services ando clarify the rules applicable to e-commerce;