310 Amendments of Hiltrud BREYER
Amendment 8 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. Whereas it is necessary to ensure that, as laid down in the EC legal framework on GMOs, scientific risk assessment associated with cultivating GM crops takes account of the environmental effects including long-term effects as well as specific characteristics of the ecosystems/environment and geographical areas hosting such crops,
Amendment 11 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
Amendment 15 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. Whereas no GMO has been authorised for cultivation since 1998 either under Directive 2001/18/EC or Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, because of the controversy concerning incomplete risk assessment in the EU,
Amendment 17 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. Whereas a little fewer than 3028 GMO products are currently authorised in the EU, directly or as derived products - cotton, maize, oilseed rape, biomass, soybean, sugar beet - almost exclusively for import; whereas the EU has authorised less GM crops than the US and Canada but more than China, Argentina, Brazil and India,
Amendment 36 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. Whereas GMOs, notably their cultivation, give rise to discussion and questions within society as well as among the scientific community; whereas GMOs are often perceived by society in a very emotional way not necessarily based on scientific ground regarding the possible impacts of GM crops on health, the environment and ecosystems,
Amendment 42 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
Ia. Whereas it is necessary to look for improvement of the implementation of the EU legal framework in order to better meet the objectives of the EC legislation,
Amendment 48 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. Whereas Member States should work more closely with each other on the issue of GMOs; whereas Member States should address this issue in a practical and rational way rather than in a political way,
Amendment 53 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Recital J a (new)
Ja. Whereas the commercial cultivation of GMOs may introduce a completely new genetic make-up over large areas,
Amendment 55 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Recital J a (new)
Ja. Whereas the cultivation of GMOs leads to changes in agricultural practices,
Amendment 62 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J b (new)
Recital J b (new)
Jb. Whereas tests on GM plants grown in open fields for the purposes of environmental risk assessment are carried out over a few hectares, whereas a GM crop which has been given a marketing authorisation may potentially be cultivated over thousands of hectares. This increase in scale may produce harmful effects which cannot be predicted on the basis of experimental studies or assessments which, as a matter of necessity, are carried out on a smaller scale,
Amendment 64 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J c (new)
Recital J c (new)
Jc. Whereas scientific expertise at European level must be improved in order to make it more balanced and multidisciplinary, so that greater account can be taken of the diversity of related agronomic and ecological issues within the European Union,
Amendment 73 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the need to increase transparency at European level and national level, especially regarding the environment and health dimensions, in order to improve citizens' confideknowledge conce rning the authorisation procedure;
Amendment 77 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the EU authorisation procedure is facing substantial delays, and that more than 50 applications for authorisation are currently pending; calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that such undue delays are avoidedmore than 50 applications for authorisation are currently pending; notes that applicant companies often do not provide the necessary information required under Directive 2001/18/EC, which result in delays;
Amendment 85 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Proposes that products which contain viable GM grains shall not be authorised if the species' centre of origin or centre of diversity is in European regions, as the modified gene can escape and spread into other native species;
Amendment 88 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that Commission decisions for GMO authorisations are exclusively based on EFSA's opinions despite the clear distinction Directive 2001/18 makes between the role of a risk manager (European Commission and Council) and a risk assessor (European Food Safety Authority);
Amendment 89 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Amendment 92 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the need for further harmoniszation of practices and methods of assessing the environmental risks of GMOs, especially as, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, the environmental evaluation is not centralised but delegated by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to a Member Statewhile ensuring that each GM crop should be analysed on a case-by-case basis taking account of the characteristics of ecosystems/environments and of the specific geographical areas in which GM crops may be cultivated in accordance with existing legislation;
Amendment 102 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the need to further develop environmental risk assessment, in particular regarding the impact on non- target species, the potential long-term effects as well as the potential consequences of the changes in the use of herbicides caused by herbicide-tolerant genetically modified plants; underlines that the environmental risk assessment shall cover all nine EU biogeographical regions defined in the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC;
Amendment 106 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the need to ensure coherence between risk assessments of GM crops which produce active substances covered by directive 91/414/EEC and those of the corresponding plant protection products;
Amendment 113 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the ongoing revision of the EFSA's guidelines on environmental evaluation requested by the Commission; stresses that these guidelines must respect the criteria contained in the annexes of Directive 2001/18/EC; emphasises the importance of taking into account the above- mentioned aspects within the framework of this revision;
Amendment 114 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the ongoing revision of the EFSA's guidelines on environmental evaluation requested by the Commission; underlines the need for these guidelines to comply with the criteria set out in the Annexes to Directive 2001/18/EC; emphasises the importance of taking into account the above-mentioned aspects within the framework of this revision;
Amendment 115 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes with satisfaction that the Commission's mandate to EFSA to further develop and update its guidelines as regards the environmental risk assessments of GMOs includes in particular detailed assessment of the long- term environmental effects of GM plants and covers the following areas: Environmental risk assessment of potential effects of genetically modified plants on non-target organisms, development of criteria for field trials to assess the potential ecological effects of the GMOs in receiving environments, identification of the EU geographic regions where the GMOs may be released, selection of appropriate techniques to assess potential long-term effects of GMOs including experimental and theoretical methodologies, and recommendations for establishing relevant baseline information;
Amendment 121 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Emphasises that Member States and the Commission should ensure that systematic and independent research on the potential risks involved in the deliberate release or the placing on the market of GMOs is conducted; and that independent researchers should be given access to all relevant material, while respecting intellectual property rights,
Amendment 122 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Urges EFSA not to issue any opinions until it has completed the European Commission mandate to improve its knowledge on the assessment of long-term environmental risks posed by GMOs;
Amendment 127 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Recognizes that current practice in the risk assessments do not specifically address the EU biogeographic regions, urges the Commission to ensure that the new guidelines guarantee case-by-case examination of the environmental impacts of GMOs on all biogeographic regions of the EU,
Amendment 130 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Urges the Commission to ensure that EFSA fulfils its legal requirement to address differences in scientific opinions and to acknowledge uncertainties, as stated in Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002;
Amendment 133 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 c (new)
Paragraph 8 c (new)
Amendment 136 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 c (new)
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Underlines that environmental risk assessments need to be carried out and/or reviewed by experts with the necessary environmental and ecological expertise to do such studies; calls on the Commission to involve the European Environmental Agency (EEA) in the GMO risk assessment procedures concerning cultivation applications in order for the EEA to provide the necessary environmental expertise;
Amendment 140 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the importance of taking into account socio-economic considerations into the risk management process, such as potential benefits or disadvantages for farmers, for consumers, for the society in general, for European agriculture and for the different economic sectors (such as food);over the medium and long term.
Amendment 143 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Recognises that the cultivation of GM crops leads to several adverse socio- economic effects such as changes in agricultural practices, impacts on social networks, loss of traditional farming knowledge, costs to prevent contamination and thus these “legitimate factors” that must be considered during the authorisation of GMOs;
Amendment 156 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
121. Stresses the need to dramatically improve public information; calls upon Member States and the Commission to launch information campaigns to raise public awareness and public understanding in order to allow citizens to make informed choices;
Amendment 167 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Transparency and information flows must be granted also to independent experts, which will be able to use this information to check GMOs independently;
Amendment 172 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that from 2007 until 2008 the area in the EU under GM cultivation dropped and that in 20058 the total area of genetically modified maize cultivated in the EU represented around 55 000 hectares and that, in 2008, it accounted for more than 100 000 hectares, representing 1,19 % of the total area of maize cultivation in the EU; notes that the only genetically modified plant cultivated in the EU today is maize MON810;
Amendment 174 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Points out that Member States may take measures to regulate the cultivation of GM crops, under national coexistence measures in conformity with Article 26 a of Directive 2001/18 which requires to “avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in other products”;
Amendment 182 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on member states and the Commission to put in place legally binding strict liability legislation that covers cases of GMO contamination and other negative effects, to ensure that the polluter pays;
Amendment 196 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Takes the view that those thresholds should be set at the lowest possible level in order to guarantee freedom of choice to producers and consumers of conventional, organic and GM products;
Amendment 201 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Recognises that establishing thresholds for GM contamination of seeds higher than detection limit would lead to an uncontrollable and untraceable spread of GMOs, recognises that even a minimal level of contamination of conventional seed stocks would make GMO-free agriculture impossible and would condemn conventional and organic producers with unjustifiably high social and economic costs;
Amendment 205 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Underlines the need to take full account of the specific regional and local characteristics of the Member States, particularly ecosystems / environments and specific geographical areas of particular value in terms of biodiversity and particular agricultural practices;
Amendment 212 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Notes that GMO-free zones can also be set up by means of a voluntary agreement which could be tacit between all operators concerned in a determined area;
Amendment 218 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Stresses that, in the addition to those possibilities, and in accordance with Community law, which includes the precautionary principle, Member States must be allowed the right to prohibit completely the cultivation of GMOs in restricted geographicalgions with specific agronomical and environmental characteristics, including small isolated areas, for instance in sites belonging to the Natura 2000 network;
Amendment 225 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Stresses that areas where products are labelled with Protected Designation of Origin (PDO), Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) and Traditional Speciality Guaranteed (TSG) indications are grown should be treated as regions with specific agronomical characteristics, where Member States should be allowed the right to prohibit completely the cultivation of GMOs;
Amendment 227 #
2008/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Points out that according to current legislation each authorisation must specify what the GMO can be used for and in which biogeographical zones it may be released;
Amendment 3 #
2008/2198(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Points out that whilst a breakthrough has been made with the appointment of Gender advisers in ESDP operation, the main challenges are still the lack of a concrete EU gender policy – particularly a policy tailored to address security aspects, a lack of gender understanding and gender awareness and/or an unwillingness to consider its importance, and a lack of pre-deployment on gender;
Amendment 4 #
2008/2198(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Stresses that rape and sexual violence are used as a weapon of war; stresses that they should be punished as war crimes and crimes against humanity; calls for more support programmes for victims;
Amendment 6 #
2008/2198(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Amendment 12 #
2008/2198(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Is convinced that ESDP mission planning should take into account the inclusion of local women’s organisations in the peace process, to build on the specific contribution which they can make and to recognise the particular ways in which women are affected by conflict;
Amendment 14 #
2008/2198(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Amendment 14 #
2008/2144(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes with concern the increased distribution of child pornography via the internet, involving ever younger children; calls on all Member States to make the blocking of access to child pornography websites a legally binding requirement, so that companies providing access to the internet are obliged to block such criminal sites;
Amendment 16 #
2008/2144(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase their efforts to prevent sexual exploitation of children on the internet, through increased funding of training and awareness-raising programmes for children and teenagers, especially concerning the risk of sexual exploitation in chat-rooms and forums;
Amendment 17 #
2008/2144(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Calls on the Member States to check whether their child protection laws still adequately ensure protection against the sexual exploitation of children and teenagers, in light of the rising incidence of sexual exploitation and harassment in new media and communication technologies and the general trend of sexualisation of children and teenagers;
Amendment 2 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
Citation 1
Amendment 3 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation (new)
Citation (new)
Amendment 4 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the Lisbon Strategy aims to ensure that 60% of women able to work are in employment; whereas efforts relating to the demographic challenge seek to promote higher birth rates to meet future requirements; whereas these two public policies target the same pivotal population group of women aged between 18 and 49, who are viewed both as workers and as mothers carrying life and bringing children into the world as well as taking care of the elderly; whereas the different policies now need to be built not just around the professional performance of workers but also around their role in society as human beinggender equality and work/life balance remains central to the debate on demographic change, recognising the diversity of 21st century family patterns,
Amendment 9 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas gaps between women and men persist in all other aspects of work quality, for instance reconciling professional and private life, and whereas the employment rate for women with dependent children is only 62,4 %, compared with 91,4 % for men, whereas 76,5 % of part-time workers are women,
Amendment 23 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
Amendment 35 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
Amendment 45 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
Amendment 50 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
Amendment 54 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
Amendment 57 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
Amendment 97 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on Eurostat to develop measures to highlight the value of invisible work in the field of inter-generational solidarity and its contribution to the Union's GDP and, for this purpose, to work closely with the World Bank, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the International Labour Office (ILO)visualise childcare and care for dependents, broken down by gender ;
Amendment 100 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission to conduct an awareness-raising campaign and introduce pilot projects to facilitate the balanced participation of women and men in professional and family life;
Amendment 101 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission to launch a new directive concerning specific rights and safeguards in relation to reconciliation of working and family life where there are dependent family members (children, elderly and disabled people), also calls on the Member States to consider flexible working hours for parents (as a result of free choice) and flexible times for children's care institutions, to help both women and men to combine work and family life more successfully;
Amendment 119 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Refers to the growing number of teenage mothers and in this context to UK studies revealing that girls as young as 13 are making their "career choice" by deciding to have children, since they see parenting as preferable to working in a "dead-end job";
Amendment 131 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Points out that women's income remains the key to their economic autonomy and to greater equality between women and men in society as a whole;
Amendment 134 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Points out that pension schemes in Member States still leave many women with only derived rights based on their husband's employment record, with the consequence that the majority of older people living in poverty are women;
Amendment 135 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 c (new)
Paragraph 11 c (new)
11c. Calls on the Member States to address the structural factors contributing to inequality in pension schemes including the organisation of care and combining family and work life, inequalities in the labour market, the gender pay gap and direct discrimination in second and third pillar pensions;
Amendment 136 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the Member States to review their tax systems and set tax rates based on individual rights and consequently demands the individualisation of pension rights as well as social security system rights;
Amendment 139 #
2008/2118(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Calls on the Member States to re- evaluate and reform their tax and benefit systems in order to facilitate the return of women to the workforce, underlines priority to be given to the abolishment of discriminatory tax systems, for example the "Ehegattensplitting";
Amendment 8 #
2008/2115(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Criticises the Commission for not taking gender mainstreaming adequately into account in its White Paper "Together for health: A Strategic Approach for the EU 2008-2013;
Amendment 9 #
2008/2115(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Points out that gender mainstreaming helps to identify and to clarify the differences between women and men, boys and girls, and demonstrates how these differences affect health status, access to, and interaction with, the health care system;
Amendment 10 #
2008/2115(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Points out that patients’ gender is the crucial factor in how doctors/healthcare personnel understand symptoms, make diagnoses and provide treatment - even when women’s and men’s symptoms are exactly the same and no biomedical facts justify any discrepancy;
Amendment 15 #
2008/2115(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls for a more prominent role to be given to the question of solidarity, which implies support for those women and men, girls and boys who suffer from a poor health condition or a handicap; calls on the Commission to propose further action on this in its health strategy;
Amendment 16 #
2008/2115(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Underlines the fact that health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity;
Amendment 17 #
2008/2115(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Stresses the need to raise awareness about the environmental factors which influence women's and men's, girls' and boys' health, such as air pollution, dangerous chemicals and toxic pesticides; calls on the Commission and the Member States to take environmental factors better into account in their health and overall policy strategies so as to ensure a high level of health protection;
Amendment 28 #
2008/2115(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Underlines the fact that there are vulnerable groups, such as pregnant and nursing women, children and adolescent girls, whose health is specifically at risk from hazardous environmental factors; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure a high level of protection of these vulnerable groups in their health and overall policy strategies;
Amendment 35 #
2008/2115(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Underlines that the non- commercialisation of the human body and its parts as cited in Article 3 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights is an integral principle in the area of health, especially for questions of cell, tissue and organ donation;
Amendment 2 #
2008/2098(INI)
Draft opinion)
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas around 2% of citizens of working age currently live and work in a Member State other than their own; whereas some 48% of all EU migrants are women, Or. . en
Amendment 5 #
2008/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that the Commission will examine whether Regulation (EC) No 883/20041, its implementing Regulation2, and related administrative practices need adapting to take account of changing patterns of worker mobility; calls on the Commission also to take into account the rights of cohabiting or lesbian couples, and former spouses of workers who have no similar social entitlements; __________ 1 Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p. 1). 2 COM 2006(0016)
Amendment 6 #
2008/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Points out that gender mainstreaming is not adequately taken into account in the Commission's Action Plan, underlines that the worker, seen primarily as male, is the primary concern, criticises that items which would aid the independent and free movement of female workers such as childcare provision are not on the priority agenda;
Amendment 1 #
2008/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Regrets that there are no binding measures for the equal representation of women and men in the European Commission; calls for a system of nomination of commissioners whereby Member States would propose a woman and a man as nominee Commissioners in 2009 and the President would choose among them with a view to achieving a gender balance;
Amendment 3 #
2008/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls, consequently, for a dual approach that complements gender mainstreaming in practice, i.e. positive actions as well as clear and binding targets and measures;
Amendment 12 #
2008/2047(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ba. whereas women's participation in the labour market is still largely characterised by a high and increasing share of part- time work up to 74.9 % in the Netherlands and 31.4% in the EU-27 in 2007 compared to only 7.8% for men,
Amendment 17 #
2008/2047(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas there is a risk of 'enforced' part-time work, particularly for women, a choice often forced on them by a lack of affordable childcare facilities,
Amendment 32 #
2008/2047(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission and Council to create a clear legal basis for combating all forms of violence against women, including trafficking, and to take a decision on the full communitarisation of a European policy to combat trafficking in human beings and on the related topics of immigration and asylum, and specifically on a right to asylum on the ground of gender-based repression and persecution;
Amendment 40 #
2008/2047(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Is concerned about women's disadvantaged labour market which implies that they accumulate fewer individual rights to pensions and other social welfare payments especially in systems where entitlement is closely based on an individual's record of employment contributions or earnings;
Amendment 5 #
2008/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Refers to the fact that equal treatment does not apply to all social security systems; calls on the Member States and the Commission to ensure that occupational pension schemes in particular are not discriminatory against women and that they do not reinforce existing patterns that already put women at a disadvantage in terms of benefits and contributions;
Amendment 1 #
2008/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to Council Directive 89/552/ECC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities,
Amendment 25 #
2008/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas gender discrimination in the media is still widespread, whereas gender stereotyping advertising and media can be considered part of this discrimination,
Amendment 26 #
2008/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas in 1996 the Swedish Government introduced a ban on all advertising aimed at children below the age of twelve and also banned any advertisements from being aired before or after any programmes aimed at children below this age,
Amendment 68 #
2008/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital O a (new)
Recital O a (new)
Oa. whereas the report by the British Government’s Equalities Office “Women not for sale” reveals that British local newspapers receive £44 million a year from advertisements offering sexual services from women,
Amendment 82 #
2008/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes that stereotyping is utilised in marketing directed at both adults and children, stresses that stereotypes in advertising on children’s television programs are a special problem because of their potential impact on gender socialization and, subsequently, children’s views of themselves, family members and the outside world;
Amendment 93 #
2008/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Draws attention in particular to the need to eliminate messages conveying gender stereotypes from textbooks, toys, TV games and, TV advertising, Internet and the new information and communications technologies (ICTs);
Amendment 111 #
2008/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Member States to ensure by appropriate means that marketing and advertising guarantee respect for human dignity and that the integrity of the person are neither directly nor indirectly discriminatory nor contain any incitement to hatred based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation, and shall not contain material which, judged in its context, sanctions, promotes or glamorises violence against women;
Amendment 112 #
2008/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Member States to prohibit pornography, meaning depictions inciting hatred based on sex, in advertising, marketing and all forms of audiovisual commercial communications and teleshopping;
Amendment 119 #
2008/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Calls on the Commission and the EU-Member States to develop a 'Code of Conduct' for advertising in which marketing communications respect the principle of equality between men and women and in which sex stereotyping and any exploitation or demeaning of men and women are avoided;
Amendment 120 #
2008/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. Reminds the Commission that Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services originally in the Commission's first proposal also covered discrimination in the media; calls on the Commission to step up its efforts against this discrimination and to launch on the basis of the 'Code of Conduct' proposals for regulatory measures;
Amendment 1 #
2008/2035(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
- having regard to the study by the European Commission, DG Employment and Social Affairs, on "undeclared work in the an enlarged union an analysis of undeclared work: an in-depth study of specific items (March 2004),
Amendment 5 #
2008/2035(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Refers to the fact that working conditions of women in undeclared work are, overall, less favourable than those of men; points out that women who do undeclared work are mostly active in sectors with traditionally "female tasks", informally employed women are found in the service sector (personal services, care), in the hotel and restaurant business, health, education and commercial cleaning;
Amendment 10 #
2008/2035(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Draws attention to service voucher schemes in Belgium, Germany and France, whereby households can buy household services at a lower price but still ensure that social security contributions and taxes are paid through the voucher;
Amendment 5 #
2008/2034(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A (new)
Recital A (new)
A. Whereas the Lisbon European Council in 2000 agreed to eradicate child poverty in Europe by 2010,
Amendment 6 #
2008/2034(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B (new)
Recital B (new)
B. Whereas the Nice European Council in 2000 called on the Member States to ensure a follow-up to the 1992 recommendation on minimum guaranteed resources to be provided by social protection systems,
Amendment 7 #
2008/2034(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital C (new)
Recital C (new)
C. Whereas the risk of poverty in Europe is significantly higher for the unemployed, single-parent households (mainly headed by women), older people living alone (also especially women) and families with several dependants,
Amendment 8 #
2008/2034(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital D (new)
Recital D (new)
D. Whereas in the absence of all social transfers, the poverty risk in the EU especially for women would increase from 16% to 40%, or 25% excluding pension payments,
Amendment 9 #
2008/2034(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital E (new)
Recital E (new)
E. Whereas women’s shorter, slower and less well-paid careers also have an impact on their risk of falling into poverty, especially for the over 65s (21% or 5 points more than men),
Amendment 13 #
2008/2034(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for a more pragmatic political and institutional approach to combating extreme poverty, which does not mix the policies on equality between men and women, the fight againstpolicy to combat poverty and discrimination and promote active participation, but which clearly and fully promotes each goal in its own right, including that of partnership with families and with the poorest people;
Amendment 17 #
2008/2034(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that the persistent trend towards feminisation of poverty in European societies today demonstrates that the current framework of social protection systems, and the wide range of EU social, economic and employment policies are not designed to meet women's needs and differences in women's work; underlines that women's poverty and social exclusion in Europe requires specific, multiple and gendered policy responses;
Amendment 18 #
2008/2034(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Advocates the use of the Open Method of Coordination for social protection and social inclusion; calls on the Commission, the Social Protection Committee and the Member States to set up specific gender equality objectives and targets to combat poverty and social exclusion, including a set of policy actions to support groups of women which face a higher risk of poverty and social exclusion, such as non- traditional and one-parent families, migrant women, refugee and ethnic minority women, older women and disabled women;
Amendment 19 #
2008/2034(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Amendment 31 #
2008/2034(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Reiterates its call to Eurostat to develop indicators to measure the success of these policies, in close cooperation with associations experienced in fighting extreme-poverty and, particularly, with the poorest people themselves, along the lines of the ‘interaction of knowledge’ programmes; also calls on Eurostat and academic researchers to undertake studies to highlight the fact that the family, and the natural solidarity network between the generations, is the best safeguard against extreme poverty and social exclusion;
Amendment 37 #
2008/2034(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 39 #
2008/2034(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Points out that 20 million people, especially women, in the EU are affected by in-work poverty, i.e. 6% of the total population and 36% of the working population are at in-work poverty risk; calls on the Member States to agree upon minimum wage legislation as an integral element of active inclusion;
Amendment 40 #
2008/2034(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. States that adequate minimum income schemes are a fundamental prerequisite for an EU based on social justice and equal opportunities for all; calls on the Member States to ensure that an adequate minimum income is provided for periods out of or in between jobs, with particular attention to groups of women that have additional responsibilities;
Amendment 43 #
2008/2034(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop an Open Method of Coordination in the field of care services in order to formulate recommendations on how to meet the need for provision of care services in Europe (i.e. the organising and financing of care for children and other dependent persons), including setting precise targets and indicators with the aim of providing childcare facilities for 90% of children from birth until mandatory school age across the EU and a sufficient level of care provision for other dependent persons by 2015; underlines that all services should meet the criteria of affordability, accessibility and good quality so that bringing up children and caring for dependents is not any longer especially for women a 'poverty risk';
Amendment 117 #
2008/0193(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 3 — point c
Article 1 – point 3 — point c
Directive 92/85/EEC
Article 11 – paragraph 3
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. The allowance referred to in point 2(b) shall be deemed adequate if it guarantees income equivalent to the last monthly salary or an average monthly salary, subject to any ceiling aid down under national legislation. Such a ceiling may. The allowance must not be lower than the allowance received by workers within the meaning of Article 2 in the event of a break in activity on grounds connected with the worker's state of health. The Member States may lay down the period over which this average monthly salary is calculated.
Amendment 30 #
2008/0192(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5
Article 5
Without prejudice to the specific conditions for access to certain activities which apply equally to both sexes, Member States shall undertake steps to grant both spouses/life-partners an equal legal status recognising their joint ownership and take the measures necessary to ensure that the conditions for the establishment of a company between spouses or life partners, when recognised by national law, are not more restrictive than the conditions for the establishment of a company with other persons.
Amendment 32 #
2008/0192(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6
Article 6
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that assisting spouses can, at their request,and life partners have mandatory social protection cover with the possibility at their request of opting out on a voluntary basis and that they benefit from at least an equal level of protection as self- employed workers under the same conditions applicable to self-employed workers.
Amendment 37 #
2008/0192(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 — paragraph 1
Article 7 — paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that female self- employed workers and assisting spouses can, at their request, be entitled to the same period of maternity leave as provided for in Directive 92/85/EEC and any subsequent legislation amending that Directive. Member States shall ensure that the mandatory period of leave laid down in such legislation is granted, at their request, to self employed workers and assisting spouses or life partners.
Amendment 41 #
2008/0192(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 — paragraph 3
Article 7 — paragraph 3
3. The allowance referred to in paragraph 2 shall be deemed adequate if it guarantees income at least equivalent to that which the person concerned would receive in the event of a break in her activities on grounds connected with her state of healthof the most recent declared earnings or, if not applicable, any equivalent allowance established by national law, subject to any ceiling laid down under national legislation.
Amendment 42 #
2008/0192(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 — paragraph 4
Article 7 — paragraph 4
4. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that female self- employed workers and assisting spouses have access as far as possible to services supplying temporary replacements or to any existing national social services, as an alternativein addition to the allowance referred to in paragraph 2.
Amendment 44 #
2008/0192(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 — paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 7 — paragraph 4 a (new)
(4a) Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that self employed workers and assisting spouses or life partners are entitled to parental leave measures including paternity leave.
Amendment 11 #
2008/0142(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) This directive aims to establish a general framework for provision of safe, high quality and efficient cross-border healthcare in the Community and to ensure patients mobility and freedom to provide healthcare and high level of protection of health, whilsprovide rules for the reimbursement of the costs of healthcare received in another Member State for patients who choose to go to another Member State for the purpose of receiving healthcare there and to enable cooperation between Member States in relation to health technology assessment, centres of reference and e-health, whilst fully respecting national competence in organising and delivering healthcare, in accordance with the principles of universal access, solidarity, affordability, equal territorial accessibility and democratic control. It fully respectings the responsibilities of the Member States forin the field of healthcare according to the Treaty including the definition of social security benefits related to health and the organisation and delivery of healthcare and medical care and social security benefits in particular for sickness.
Amendment 12 #
2008/0142(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) For the purpose of this Directive, the concept of ‘cross-border healthcare’ covers the following modes of supply of healthcare: – Use of healthcare abroad (i.e.: a patient moving to a healthcare provider in another Member State for treatment); this is what is referred to as ‘patient mobility’; – Cross-border provision of healthcare (i.e.: delivery of service from the territory of one Member State into the territory of another); such as telemedicine services, remote diagnosis and prescription, laboratory services; – Permanent presence of a healthcare provider (i.e.: establishment of a healthcare provider in another Member State); and, – Temporary presence of persons (i.e.: mobility of health professionals, for example moving temporarily to the Member State of the patient to provide services)use of healthcare in a Member State other than the Member State of residence by patients who choose to travel to another Member State for the purpose of receiving healthcare there.
Amendment 18 #
2008/0142(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1
Article 1
This Directive establishes a general framework for the provision of safeprovides rules for reimbursement of the costs of healthcare received in another Member State for patients who choose to go to another Member State for the purpose of receiving healthcare there and enables cooperation between Member States in relation to health technology assessment, centres of reference and e-health, whigh quality and efficient cross-border healthcarelst fully respecting national competence in organising and delivering healthcare, in accordance with the principles of universal access, solidarity, affordability, equal territorial accessibility and democratic control.
Amendment 33 #
2008/0142(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Prior authorisation shall in any case be granted when the patient is in need of medical treatment normally provided for by the social security system of the Member State of affiliation and the treatment cannot be provided in the Member State of residence, within a time limit which is medically justifiable, as established by Regulation No 1408/71 and Regulation No 883/2004.
Amendment 34 #
2008/0142(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. The Member State of treatment may take appropriate measures to address the inflow of patients and to prevent it from undermining, or being likely to undermine, the planning and rationalisation carried out in the hospital sector to avoid hospital overcapacity, imbalance in the supply of hospital care and logistical and financial wastage, the maintenance of a balanced medical and hospital service open to all, or the maintenance of treatment capacity or medical competence on the territory of the Member State concerned. The Member State of treatment shall refrain from discriminating with regard to nationality and shall ensure that the measures restricting free movement shall be limited to what is necessary and proportionate. The Member State of treatment shall notify these measures to the Commission.
Amendment 36 #
2008/0142(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 − paragraph 1
Article 10 − paragraph 1
1. The Member States of affiliation shall ensure that there are mechanisms in place to provide patients on request with information on receiving healthcare in another Member State, and the terms and conditions that would apply, inter alia, whenever harm is caused as a. In information about cross-border care, a clear distinction shall be made between the rights which patients have by virtue of this Directive and rights arising from resgult of healthcare received in another Member Stateations on the coordination of social security schemes as referred to in Article 3(1)(f).
Amendment 95 #
2008/0140(CNS)
Article 4 - paragraph 1 - introductory part
1. In order to guarantee compliance with the principle of equal treatment in relation to persons with disabilities, in which connection 'disability' is to be understood as it is defined in the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and includes persons with chronic diseases:
Amendment 31 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25 (a) new
Recital 25 (a) new
Amendment 41 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(ia)'nanomaterial' means an intentionally manufactured material with one or more external dimensions, or an internal structure, of the order of 100 nm or less, which could exhibit novel characteristics compared to the same material without nanoscale features.
Amendment 64 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) the presence of substances in the form of micronised particles other than substances listed in Annexe III to VI to this Regulationr nanomaterials;
Amendment 67 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph i a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph i a (new)
(ia) nanomaterials until such a time as safety assessments relating to the effects of nanomaterials on human health based on information derived from scientifically robust, nano-specific safety tests not entailing the use of vertebrate animals have shown that their use is safe.
Amendment 69 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. Subject to a Commission Decision to extend the scope of Annex IV to hair colouring productsBy 31 December 2009 at the latest, these products shall not contain colorants intended to colour the hair, other than those listed in Annex IV and colorants intended to colour the hair, which are not used in accordance with the conditions laid down in that Annex.
Amendment 70 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part and indent 1
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part and indent 1
However, such substances may exceptionally be used in specific cosmetic products if, subsequent to their classification as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction of category 1 or 2 under Directive 67/548/EEC after entry into force of this Regulation, all of the following conditions are fulfilled: - they have been evaluated and found safe for use by the SCCP in specific cosmetic products in particular in view of exposurethe global exposure from other significant sources as well as taking particular account of vulnerable population groups;
Amendment 87 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point g – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point g – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Nanomaterials shall be referred to by using the prefix 'nano'.
Amendment 102 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 34 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Article 26(2) shall not apply to cosmetic products which contain nanomaterials not yet listed in Annex VIa if they have been placed on the market before the date referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article. These products may remain on the market for two years after the date referred to in paragraph 2. After that date Article 11(h) and Article 26(2) shall apply.
Amendment 105 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part A – point 1
Annex I – part A – point 1
Amendment 106 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part A – point 2 – subparagraph 1 and 2
Annex I – part A – point 2 – subparagraph 1 and 2
Amendment 107 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part A – point 3 – subparagraph 1
Annex I – part A – point 3 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 108 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part A – point 4 – subparagraph 1
Annex I – part A – point 4 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 109 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part A – point 4 – subparagraph 3
Annex I – part A – point 4 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 110 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part A – point 5
Annex I – part A – point 5
Amendment 111 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part A – point 6 – introduction
Annex I – part A – point 6 – introduction
Description ofata on and assessment of the exposure to cosmetic product taking into consideration the findings under Section 5 in relation to
Amendment 112 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part A – point 7
Annex I – part A – point 7
Descriptionata on and assessment of the exposure to the substances contained in the cosmetic product for the relevant toxicological endpoints taking into account the information under Section 6.
Amendment 113 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part A – point 8 – subparagraph 1
Annex I – part A – point 8 – subparagraph 1
Without prejudice to Article 14, descriptionan assessment of the toxicological profile of all relevant toxicological endpoints. A particular focus on local toxicity evaluation (skin and eye irritation), skin sensitisation, and in the case of UV absorption photo- induced toxicity shall be made.
Amendment 115 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part A – point 8 – subparagraph 3 – indent 3
Annex I – part A – point 8 – subparagraph 3 – indent 3
- interaction of substances (cumulative and synergistic effects)
Amendment 116 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part A – point 9
Annex I – part A – point 9
Amendment 117 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part A – point 10
Annex I – part A – point 10
Other relevant information, e.g. description of existing studies from human volunteers.
Amendment 121 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – introduction (new)
Annex III – introduction (new)
This list of substances does not apply to substances in the form of nanomaterials.
Amendment 122 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – introduction (new)
Annex IV – introduction (new)
This list of substances does not apply to substances in the form of nanomaterials.
Amendment 123 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex V – introduction (new)
Annex V – introduction (new)
This list of substances does not apply to substances in the form of nanomaterials.
Amendment 124 #
2008/0035(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex VI – introduction (new)
Annex VI – introduction (new)
This list of substances does not apply to substances in the form of nanomaterials.
Amendment 125 #
Amendment 183 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) Recent developments in the expression of the nutrition declaration, other than per 100g/100ml/portion, by some Member States and organisations in the food sector suggest that consumers like such schemes with an interpretative elemesnt as they can help them make informed choices quickly. However, there is not evidence across all the Community on how the average consumer understands and uses the alternative expression of the information. Therefore, it is appropriate to allow for different schemes to be developed and to allow research on consumer understanding in different Member States to continue so that, if appropriate, harmThe available evidence has proven that a simplified labelling scheme which comprises multiple colour coding for easier and quicker interpretation of nutrition information ised schemes may be introduced the best and preferred option for consumers.
Amendment 459 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the amounts of fat, saturates, carbohydrates with specific reference to sugars, and saltsugars, salt, carbohydrates, protein, and artificial and natural transfats.
Amendment 472 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 2
Article 29 – paragraph 2
2. The nutrition declaration may also include the amounts of one or more of the following: (a) trans fats; (b) mono-unsaturates; (cb) polyunsaturates; (dc) polyols; (ed) starch; (fe) fibre; (gf) (h)any of the minerals or vitamins listed in point 1 of Part A of Annex XI, and present in significant amounts as defined in point 2 of Part A of Annex XI. protein; any of the minerals or vitamins
Amendment 509 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 - paragraph 3
Article 31 - paragraph 3
3. The mandatory nutrition declaration shall be expressed, as appropriate, as a percentage of the reference intakes set out in Part B of Annex XI inlevels of the nutrients on the front of pack nutrition information referred to in Article 29(1)(a) shall be indicated through a multiple colour coding system. The colours green, yellow and red shall indicate whether a food is low, medium or high in these nutrients. This information shall be communicated per 100g or per 100ml. The definition of the reference amounts for high, medium and low levels of these nutrients shall be established in accordance with the regulation to per 100 g or per 100 ml or per portionory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 49 (3) based on an opinion of the European Food Safety Authority. When provided, the declaration on vitamins and minerals shall also be expressed as a percentage of the reference intakes set out in point 1 of Part A of Annex XI.
Amendment 524 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 - paragraph 4
Article 31 - paragraph 4
4. The declaration of polyols and/or starch and the declaration of type of fatty acids, other than the mandatory declaration of saturates and trans fats referred to in Article 29(1)(b), shall be presented in accordance with Annex XIII Part B.
Amendment 569 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 - paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 34 - paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 664 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 2.1
Annex III – point 2.1
2.1 Foods ‘with containing a sweetener(s)’ this sweetener or statement shall sweeteners accompany the authorised name of the food. pursuant to in the principal Directive 89/107/ field of vision. EEC
Amendment 667 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 2.2
Annex III – point 2.2
2.2 Foods ‘with sugar(s) and containing both sweetener(s)’ this an added sugar or statement shall sugars and a accompany the sweetener or name of the food. sweeteners authorisedin the principal authorised field of vision. pursuant to Directive 89/107/ EEC
Amendment 106 #
2008/0018(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) In particular power should be conferred on the Commission in order to adapt the chemical requirements in certain well defined cases, the Commission should be empowered to lower the maximum limits for certain chemical elements, adopt new restrictions for certain other chemicals, adapt the limit values for noise and grant exemptions from the prohibition of certain CMR substances in certain cases as well as to adapt the wording of the specific warnings for certain categories of toys. Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to amend non- essential elements of this Directive and/ or to supplement this Directive by the addition of, inter alia by supplementing it with new non- essential elements, they must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Amendment 126 #
2008/0018(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) Points 7 and 8 in Part III of Annex II to lower the migration limits;
Amendment 128 #
2008/0018(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 45 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 45 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Without prejudice to the restrictions laid down in Part III of Annex II, the Commission may, where appropriate and in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 46 (2), amend Annex II with a view to: – defining limit values or other restrictions for substances or preparations posing a risk to health other than those listed in points 7 and 8 in Part III of Annex II; – adopting or adapting limit values for noise.
Amendment 134 #
2008/0018(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point 10
Annex II – Part I – point 10
10. Toys which are designed to emit a sound should be so designed and constructed so that the sound from them is not able to impair children’s hearing's hearing. This shall apply to all toys irrespective of the age group targeted. The limit for impulse noise should be 135 dB LpC peak at the ear. Limits for continuous noise shall be set on the basis of the sensitivity of the ear of an infant under 36 months of age.
Amendment 137 #
2008/0018(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part III – point 3
Annex II – Part III – point 3
3. Without prejudice to the application of the restrictions under the first sentence of point 2, the use in toys of substances that are classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction (CMR) according to Directive 67/548/EEC in individual concentrations equal to or greater than the relevant concentrations established for the classification of preparations containing the substances in accordance with the provisions of Directive 1999/45/EC0,1% in homogeneous parts of the toy shall be prohibited, except if the substances are contained in components of toys or micro- structurally distinct parts of toys that are not accessible to any physical contact by children, including inhalation, by children, thus excluding any possibility of exposure.
Amendment 139 #
2008/0018(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part III – point 4 – introductory part
Annex II – Part III – point 4 – introductory part
4. Substances or preparations classified as CMR category 1 and 23 according to Directive 67/548/EEC may be used in toys provided that the following conditions are met:
Amendment 141 #
2008/0018(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part III – point 5
Annex II – Part III – point 5
Amendment 142 #
2008/0018(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part III – point 5 a (new)
Annex II – Part III – point 5 a (new)
5a. The Commission shall establish a programme aimed at systematically and regularly evaluating the occurrence of hazardous substances or materials in toys. The programme shall take into account reports of market surveillance bodies and concerns expressed by Member States and stakeholders. The Commission shall decide, following the opinion of the relevant Scientific Committee, to take appropriate restrictive measures, if necessary. Those measures, designed to amendment non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 46(2).
Amendment 145 #
2008/0018(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part III – point 7
Annex II – Part III – point 7
7. Toys shall not contain the following allergenic fragrances: (1) Alanroot (Inula helenium) (2) Allylisothiocyanate (3) Benzyl cyanide (4) 4 tert-Butylphenol (5) Chenopodium oil (6) Cyclamen alcohol (7) Diethyl maleate (8) Dihydrocoumarin (9) 2,4-Dihydroxy-3-methylbenzaldehyde (10) 3,7-Dimethyl-2-octen-1-ol (6,7- Dihydrogeraniol) (11) 4,6-Dimethyl-8-tert-butylcoumarin (12) Dimethyl citraconate (13) 7,11-Dimethyl-4,6,10-dodecatrien-3- one (14) 6,10-Dimethyl-3,5,9-undecatrien-2- one (15) Diphenylamine (16) Ethyl acrylate (17) Fig leaf, fresh and preparations (18) trans-2-Heptenal (19) trans-2-Hexenal diethyl acetal (20) trans-2-Hexenal dimethyl acetal (21) Hydroabietyl alcohol (22) 4-Ethoxy-phenol (23) 6-lsopropyl-2-decahydronaphthalenol (24) 7-Methoxycoumarin (25) 4-Methoxyphenol (26) 4-(p-Methoxyphenyl)-3-butene-2-one (27) 1-(p-Methoxyphenyl)-1-penten-3-one (28) Methyl trans-2-butenoate (29) 6-Methylcoumarin (30) 7-Methylcoumarin (31) 5-Methyl-2,3-hexanedione (32) Costus root oil (Saussurea lappa Clarke) (33) 7-Ethoxy-4-methylcoumarin (34) Hexahydrocoumarin (35) Peru balsam (Myroxylonpereirae Klotzsch) (36) 2-Pentylidene-cyclohexanone (37) 3,6,10-Trimethyl-3,5,9-undecatrien- 2-one (38) Verbana oil (Lippia citriodora Kunth). However, the presence of traces of these substances shall be allowed provided that such presence is technically unavoidable in good manufacturing practice. In addition the following allergenic fragrances shall be listed if added to toys, as such, at concentrations exceeding 0,01 % by weight: (1) Amyl cinnamal (2) Amylcinnamyl alcohol (3) Anisyl alcohol (4) Benzyl alcohol (5) Benzyl benzoate (6) Benzyl cinnamate (7) Benzyl salicylate (8) Cinnamal (9) Cinnamyl alcohol (10) Citral (11) Citronellol (12) Coumarin (13) Eugenol (14) Farnesol (15) Geraniol (16) Hexyl cinnamaldehyde (17) Hydroxy-citronellal (18) Hydroxy- methylpentylcyclohexenecarboxaldehyde (19) Isoeugenol (20) Lilial (referred to in the Cosmetics Directive in entry 83 as: 2-(4-tert- Butylbenzyl) propionaldehyde (21) d-Limonene (22) Linalool (23) Methyl heptine carbonate (24) 3-methyl-4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-2- cyclohexen-1-yl)-3-buten-2-one (25) Oakmoss extracts (26) Treemoss extractsany fragrances.
Amendment 151 #
2008/0018(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part III – point 8 – table
Annex II – Part III – point 8 – table
Element mg/kg in solid, dry, mg/kg brittle, powder-like in liquid or sticky or pliable toy toy material material Aluminium 5625 1406 Antimony 45 11.3 Arsenic deleted 7.5deleted 1.9deleted Barium 4500 1125 Boron 1200 300 Cadmium deleted deleted 3.8 deleted 0.9 Chromium (III) 37.5 9.4 Chromium (VI) deleted 0.04 deleted 0.01deleted Cobalt 10.5 2.6 Copper 622.5 156 Lead deleted deleted 27 deleted 6.8 Manganese 1200 300 Mercury deleted deleted 15 deleted 3.8 Nickel 75 75 18.8 Selenium 37.5 9.4 Strontium 4500 1125 Tin Tin 15000 3750 Organic tin deleted 1.9deleted 0.5deleted Zinc 3750 938
Amendment 153 #
2008/0018(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part III – point 8 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Annex II – Part III – point 8 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Substances or preparations based on any of the following elements shall be prohibited for use in toys or components of toys: (1) Arsenic (2) Cadmium (3) Chromium (V) (4) Lead (5) Mercury (6) Organic tin
Amendment 154 #
2008/0018(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex IV – point (a)
Annex IV – point (a)
(a) a detailed description of the design and manufacture, including a list of components and, materials and raw materials used in toys as well as the safety data sheets on chemicals used to be obtained from chemical suppliersdetailed information on chemicals used in the toys and their component parts, and the quantities used;
Amendment 43 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The free movement of safe and wholesome food is an essential aspect of the internal market and contributes significantly to the health and well-being of citizens, as well as to their social and economic interests. Differences between national laws, regulations and administrative provisions concerning the safety assessment and authorisation of novel foods may hinder their free movement, thereby potentially creating unfair competition conditions.
Amendment 44 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) A high level of human health and consumer protection should be assured in the pursuit of Community policies as well as a high level of animal welfare and environmental protection. At all times, the precaution principle should apply.
Amendment 45 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
Recital 2 a (new)
2a. Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union clarifies that the Union and the Member States shall, since animals are sentient beings, pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals when formulating and implementing policies
Amendment 46 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 b (new)
Recital 2 b (new)
2b. European Parliament resolution of 3 September 2008 on the cloning of animals for food supply calls on the Commission to submit proposals prohibiting for food supply purposes (i) the cloning of animals, (ii) the farming of cloned animals or their offspring, (iii) the placing on the market of meat or dairy products derived from cloned animals or their offspring and (iv) the importing of cloned animals, their offspring, semen and embryos from cloned animals or their offspring, and meat or dairy products derived from cloned animals or their offspring.
Amendment 47 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 c (new)
Recital 2 c (new)
2c. The Commission's Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) adopted on 28-29 September 2005 an opinion which concluded that there are ‘major gaps in the knowledge necessary for risk assessment. These include nanoparticle characterisation, the detection and measurement of nanoparticles, the dose-response, fate, and persistence of nanoparticles in humans and in the environment, and all aspects of toxicology and environmental toxicology related to nanoparticles’; furthermore draws attention to the conclusion of SCENIHR that ‘existing toxicological and ecotoxicological methods may not be sufficient to address all of the issues arising with nanoparticles’;
Amendment 53 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) Test methods currently available are not adequate for assessing the risks associated with nanomaterials. Nano- specific non-animal test methods should urgently be developed. In order to protect human health and prevent animal testing, the use of nanotechnologies in food production should be prohibited until such a time as sufficient nano-specific non-animal test methods have been approved for use and an adequate safety assessment on the basis of these tests has been carried out.
Amendment 60 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) Novel foods should be placed on the Community market only if they are safe and, do not mislead the consumer, and show clear benefits for the consumers. In addition, they should not differ from the food that they are to replace in any way that would be nutritionally disadvantageous for the consumer.
Amendment 61 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15 a (new)
Recital 15 a (new)
Amendment 63 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) Where appropriate andOn the basedis onf the conclusions of the safety assessment, post- market monitoring requirements for the use of novel foods for human consumption should be introduced.
Amendment 65 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Under specific circumstances in order to stimulate research and development within the agri-food industry, and thus innovation, the newly developed scientific evidence and proprietary data provided in support of an application for inclusion of a novel food in the Community list should not be used to the benefit of another applicant during a limited period of time, without the agreement of the first applicant. The protection of scientific data provided by one applicant should not prevent other applicants from seeking the inclusion in the Community list of novel foods on the basis of their own scientific data. However, the repetition of studies involving vertebrates should be prohibited. In this context, there should be an obligation to allow access to studies on vertebrates and other studies that may prevent animal testing.
Amendment 68 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) Novel foods are subject to the general labelling requirements laid down in Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs. In certain cases it might be necessary to provide for additional labelling information, in particular regarding the description of the food, its source, or its conditions of use. Therefore, the inclusion of a novel food in the Community list maywill impose specific conditions of use or labelling obligations in those cases. Products produced with the aid of nanotechnologies and food produced from animals fed with genetically modified feedingstuffs must be labelled as such.
Amendment 75 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1
Article 1
This Regulation lays down harmonised rules for the placing of novel foods on the market in the Community with a view to ensuring a high level of human health and consumers’ protection, whilst ensuringprotection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, the environment and the interests of consumers, whilst ensuring transparency and the effective functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 81 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, this Regulation shall apply to food additives, food enzymes, flavourings and certain food ingredients with flavouring properties to which is applied a new production process not used before 15 May 1997 giving rise to significant changes in the composition or structure of the food (e.g. nanotechnologies). If novel foods can also have the impact of an additive or flavouring in a food product, they should be covered by both this regulation and the food additives legislation or the food flavourings legislation.
Amendment 89 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 - point (a) (iii)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 - point (a) (iii)
(iii) food to which is applied a new production process, not used before 15 May 1997,in a significant way in the Community before 15 May 1997, - definitely including, but not confined to, foods produced with the aid of nanotechnologies - where that production process gives rise to significant changes in the composition or structure of the food which affect its nutritional value, metabolism or level of undesirable substances.;
Amendment 95 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 - point (c a) (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 - point (c a) (new)
(ca) ‘produced with the aid of nanotechnologies’: a product which contains, consists of or is produced with the aid of substances in the order of 300 nm in length, breadth or height and/or substances that exhibit, due to their reduced particle size, novel characteristics compared to the common form.
Amendment 104 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5
Article 5
Only novel foods included in the Community list of novel foods (hereinafter "the Community list") may be placed on the market. The Commission shall keep and publish the Community list on a publicly accessible page intended for the purpose on the website of the Commission.
Amendment 107 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – introduction
Article 6 – introduction
1. A novel food may be included in the Community list only if it meets the following conditions:
Amendment 108 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – point (a)
Article 6 – point (a)
(a) it does not, on the basis of the scientific evidence available, pose a safety concern to the health of the consumer under normal consumption conditions; this implies that cumulative and synergistic effects as well as possible adverse effects on particular groups of the population will be taken into account in the risk assessment; Or. en Justification
Amendment 111 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – point (c a) (new)
Article 6 – point (c a) (new)
(ca) it shows clear benefits for consumers;
Amendment 112 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – point (c b) (new)
Article 6 – point (c b) (new)
(cb) its use does not have a negative impact on the environment, nor does its use produce residues or undigested substances that are persistent and accumulative or have in any other way a negative impact on the environment;
Amendment 116 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Foods to which production processes have been applied that require specific risk assessment methods (e.g. nanotechnologies) may not be included in the Community list until such specific methods have been approved for use, and an adequate safety assessment on the basis of these methods has shown that the use of the respective foods is safe. These methods must not entail the use of vertebrate animals.
Amendment 117 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. In case of doubt, e.g. if there is insufficient scientific certainty or lack of data, the precautionary principle shall be applied and the food in question can not be included in the Community list.
Amendment 119 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
(2) The entry of a novel food in the Community list shall include: (a) a specification of the food, and, where appropriate, specify the conditions of use, additional specific labelling requirements to inform the final consumer and/or a post-market monitoring requirement; (b) the intended use of the food; (c) the conditions of use; (d) the date of entry of the novel food in the Community list and the date of receipt of the application; (e) the name and address of the applicant; (f) the date and results of the last inspection according to the monitoring requirements laid down in Article 11.
Amendment 124 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a – subparagraph 1 (new)
2a. Novel Foods are subject to the general labelling requirements laid down in Directive 2000/13/EC. Additional specific labelling requirements may be laid down for specific novel foods, in particular regarding the description of the food, its source, or its conditions of use. Where this is the case, the labelling requirement shall be mentioned in the Community list.
Amendment 125 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a – subparagraph 2 (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a – subparagraph 2 (new)
Products produced with the aid of nanotechnologies must be labelled with the words ‘produced with the aid of nanotechnologies’;
Amendment 126 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a – subparagraph 3 (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a – subparagraph 3 (new)
Products produced from animals fed with genetically modified feedingstuffs must be labelled with the words ‘produced from animals fed with genetically modified feedingstuffs’;
Amendment 128 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Amendment 140 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. A food business operator intending to place a traditional food from a third country on the market in the Community shall notify itsubmit an application to the Commission, indicating the name of the food, its composition and country of origin. The notifapplication shall be accompanied by a dossier with documented data demonstrating the history of safe food use in the third country based on the guidelines referred to in paragraph 5a.
Amendment 142 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall forward the notification including the demonstration of history of safe food use referred to in paragraph 1 without delay to the Member States and the Authority and make it publicly available on its website.
Amendment 144 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. Within fourThe Authority shall, on the basis of the requirements specified in Article 6 and taking into consideration the dossier provided by the food business operator, assess whether the food is safe and can be placed on the European market. Within six months from the date on which the notification provided for in paragraph 2 is forwarded by the Commission, a Member State and/ or the Authority may inform the Commission that they have reasoned safety objections, based on scientific evidence, to the placing on the market of the traditional food concerned.
Amendment 149 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall publish a list of traditional foods from third countries that may be placed on the market in the Community in accordance with paragraph 4 on a dedicated page of the Commission's website. This page shall be accessible from and linked to the page on the Community list on novel foods referred to in Article 5 paragraph 1.
Amendment 150 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Amendment 152 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9
Article 9
The Commission shall, where appropriate, in close cooperation with the Authority, make available technical guidance and tools to assist food business operators and especially small and medium-sized enterprises in preparing and submitting applications under this Regulation. The technical guidance and tools shall be published, not later than six months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation, on a publicly accessible page intended for the purpose on the website of the Commission.
Amendment 156 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – introduction
Article 10 – introduction
In assessing the safety of novel foods, the Authority shall, on the basis of the requirements specified in Article 6:
Amendment 157 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – point (a)
Article 10 – point (a)
(a) compare, where appropriatpossible, if the food is as safe as food from a comparable food category already existing on the market in the Community or as the food that the novel food is intended to replace; while also taking into account the implications of any new characteristics;
Amendment 162 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – point (b)
Article 10 – point (b)
(b) take into account for traditional food from a third country, the history of safe food use.; thereby referring to the guidelines laid down in Article 8, paragraph 5a;
Amendment 165 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission mayshall impose for food safety reasons and following the opinion of the Authority, a requirement for post- market monitoring. The food business operators placing the food in the Community market shall be responsible for the implement requirement for post- market monitoring. This monitoring shall take place every five years and take into account food safety aspects as well as animal health and welfare aspects and the environmental impact. Special attention should be paid to the categories of the population ofwith the post- marketing requirements specified in the entry of the food concerned in the Community list of novel foodhighest dietary intakes. The monitoring requirements shall also apply to novel foods already on the market, including novel foods that have been approved under the simplified procedure ('notification') of Regulation (EC) No 258/97. Member States shall appoint competent authorities that will be responsible for the post-marketing monitoring. The costs for the monitoring shall be covered by the respective food business operators.
Amendment 168 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 - paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 11 - paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In order to avoid animal testing, testing on vertebrate animals for the purposes of this Regulation shall be undertaken only as a last resort. The use of non-animal tests and intelligent testing strategies shall be promoted, and duplicate vertebrate animal testing shall be prohibited.
Amendment 172 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12
Article 12
1. On request by the applicant, supported by appropriate and verifiable information included in the application dossier, newly developed scientific evidence and proprietary scientific data provided to support the applications, may not be used for the benefit of another application during a period of five years from the date of the inclusion of the novel food in the Community list without the agreement of the applicant unless there is a public health protection justification for doing so.
Amendment 177 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Data from research projects partly or completely paid by the EC and/or public institutions and risk studies or data related to risk studies, like feeding studies should be published together with the application and are free to be used by other applicants.
Amendment 178 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. In any circumstance, the repetition of studies involving vertebrates will be prohibited. In this context, studies involving tests on vertebrate animals and studies that may prevent animal testing will not be covered by data protection. Thus access to studies on vertebrates and other studies that may prevent animal testing must be allowed.
Amendment 183 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 a (new)
Article 12 a (new)
Article 12a Inspection and control measures In order to enforce compliance with the present Regulation, official controls are to be carried out in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules.
Amendment 186 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13
Article 13
The Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provision of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. The Member States shall notify those provisions to the Commission by [..] at the latest and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them. This information shall be made available to the public by the Commission.
Amendment 187 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13a Privileges of Member States 1. Where a Member State, as a result of new information or a reassessment of existing information, has detailed grounds for considering that the use of a food or a food ingredient complying with this Regulation endangers human health or the environment, that Member State may either temporarily restrict or suspend the trade in and use of the food or food ingredient in question in its territory. It shall immediately inform the other Member States and the Commission thereof, giving the grounds for its decision. 2. The Commission, in close cooperation with EFSA, shall examine the grounds referred to in paragraph 1 as soon as possible and shall take the appropriate measures. The Member State which took the decision referred to in paragraph 1 may maintain it until the measures have entered into force.
Amendment 190 #
2008/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Food products that have been produced with the aid of nanotechnologies and that have been placed on the market before the entry into force of this Regulation may remain on the market for 18 months after the date of publication of this Regulation. After that date, Article 6 paragraph 2 shall apply.
Amendment 7 #
2007/2290(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the employment situation in Europe is not in line with the Lisbon strategy which has as its aims more and better jobs, full employment and social inclusion especially for women,
Amendment 8 #
2007/2290(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the gender and intergenerational dimension greatly increase the risk of having a weaker position in the labour market, since women, and older and also younger workers engaged in non-standard contracts have fewer chances to improve their position in the labour market,
Amendment 13 #
2007/2290(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that an analysis and reform of social protection systems in the Member States must be framed in a gender equality perspective and include the individualisation of rights to social security, adapting social protection and services to the changing family structures and ensuring that social protection systems better counteract women's precarious situation and meet the needs of non-traditional and one-parent families;
Amendment 19 #
2007/2290(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Requests that the Commission and the Member States as a matter of urgency take measures prohibiting direct discrimination in occupational pension schemes, including the practice of basing the level of payments and contributions on actuarial factors based on sex;
Amendment 22 #
2007/2290(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – indent 1
Paragraph 6 – indent 1
– recognition of periods spend devoted to reconciling work and family life, such as maternity leave, parental leave, periods spent looking after a dependent relative and educational responsibilities, for example by increasing periods of compulsory insurance of complete the period of social insurance overage required for entitlement to a pension;
Amendment 10 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 a (new)
Citation 17 a (new)
Amendment 11 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 b (new)
Citation 17 b (new)
– having regard to the Declaration of the Rights of Sex Workers in Europe adopted at the European Conference on Sex Work, Human Rights, Labour and Migration held on 15-17 October 2005 in Brussels,
Amendment 12 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 c (new)
Citation 17 c (new)
– having regard to Council Directive 2004/83 of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted,
Amendment 14 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 e (new)
Citation 17 e (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 17 January 2006 on strategies to prevent the trafficking of women and children who are vulnerable to sexual exploitation1
Amendment 15 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 f (new)
Citation 17 f (new)
Amendment 16 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 g (new)
Citation 17 g (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 15 March 2006 on forced prostitution in the context of world sports events 1
Amendment 37 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas trafficking in persons, particularly women and children, for sexual as well as other forms of exploitation, is one the most egregious violations of human rights, and whereas trafficking in human beings is growing globally as a result of the increase in organised crime and its profitability,
Amendment 72 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas men who have ever paid for sex are significantly more likely to have contracted a sexually transmitted infectionthe widely held assumption that prostitutes were the main group affected by HIV/AIDS, or rather the main risk group, has not been substantiated by scientific evidence,
Amendment 92 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital O a (new)
Recital O a (new)
Oa. whereas the term “violence against women” is to be understood as any act of gender-based violence, which results in, or is likely to result in, physical, sexual or psychological harm or suffering to women, including threats of such acts, coercion, or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or private life,
Amendment 101 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 a (new)
Paragraph -1 a (new)
-1a. Defines violence against women as 'any act of gender-based violence that results in, or is likely to result in, physical, sexual or mental harm or suffering to women, including threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or in private life' in accordance with the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1993;
Amendment 102 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 b (new)
Paragraph -1 b (new)
-1b. Determines gender-based violence to be physical, sexual or psychological violence occurring within the family and in the wider community, including beatings, the sexual abuse of children, dowry-related violence, rape, female genital mutilation and other traditional practices harmful to women, non-spousal violence and violence related to exploitation, sexual harassment and intimidation at work, in educational institutions and elsewhere, trafficking in women, forced prostitution, and violence perpetrated or condoned by the State;
Amendment 103 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 c (new)
Paragraph -1 c (new)
-1c. Calls on the Commission and the Council to create a clear legal basis for combating all forms of violence against women and to take a decision on the full communitarisation of a European policy;
Amendment 104 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 d (new)
Paragraph -1 d (new)
-1d. Calls on the EU Member States and all other States to address the structural problems involved (poverty, political instability/war, gender inequality, unequal opportunities, lack of education and training), including in prostitutes' countries of origin, as the case may be, to prevent people from being 'forced' into prostitution by circumstances;
Amendment 105 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 e (new)
Paragraph -1 e (new)
-1e. Underlines the fact that child prostitution can never be voluntary, as children do not have the capacity to 'consent' to prostitution; urges the Member States to prohibit child prostitution (under the age of 21) and to combat as energetically as possible other forms of forced prostitution; urgently demands a zero-tolerance approach based on prevention, the protection of victims and the prosecution of clients;
Amendment 109 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 i (new)
Paragraph -1 i (new)
-1i. Calls on the Member States to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings;
Amendment 116 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that women who have experienced gender-based violence are at greater risk of problems such as chronic pain, disability, miscarriage and somatic disorders; points out that the psychological and emotional secondary disorders (sequelae) of abuse often manifest themselves in higher levels of depression, anxiety, panic attacks, substance abuse, eating disorders and psychiatric disorders;
Amendment 122 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Points out that social, legal, interpersonal and epidemiological factors create the conditions in which HIV and STDs rapidly spread; calls for an effective targeted response in order to promote safer behaviour, to improve access to effective health and social services and to address the underlying structural and occupational dimensions of vulnerability;
Amendment 157 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Considers it essential for risk- reducing practices to avoid discrimination against people engaged in prostitution by ensuring their active participation in prevention efforts;
Amendment 175 #
2007/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Refers to the report by the German Government on the impact of the Prostitution Act, pointing out that recent scientific evidence shows that prostitutes are not the main group affected by HIV/AIDS;
Amendment 25 #
2007/2252(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to stop misrepresenting Parliament’s position with regard to the Environment and Health Action Plan as being “supportive”, when in fact Parliament has been and continues to be highly critical of the Action Plan, given its downgrading to a Research Plan;
Amendment 32 #
2007/2252(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission to evaluate the Action Plan in its own right, and not to cover up for its lack of actions to reduce disease burden by listing measures that were proposed independently of this Action Plan;
Amendment 40 #
2007/2252(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that shifting the burden of proof on to producers or importers and requiring them to demonstrate that a product is harmless would make it possible for a policy based on prevention to be promoted (as provided for in European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of 18 December 2006 concerning the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (REACH) and establishing a European Chemicals Agency1), and encourages the Commission to extend that obligation to Community legislation concerning all products; 1 OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1; corrected version in OJ L 136, 29.5.2007, p. 3
Amendment 47 #
2007/2252(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls once again upon the Commission to publish a Green Papercome forward with concrete measures on indoor air quality which would enable guidelinessure a high level of protection onf health and safety indoors to be established, within particular reference to the propertieswhen revising the directive ofn construction materials,products, and to propose measures to increase the energy efficiency of buildings and the safety and the harmlessness of chemical compounds used in equipment and furnishings;
Amendment 52 #
2007/2252(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Is particularly concerned about the lack of specific legal provisions to ensure the safety of consumer products containing nanoparticles and the relaxed attitude of the Commission with regard to the need to review the regulatory framework for the use of nanoparticles in consumer products in light of the increasing number of consumer products containing nanoparticles being put on the market; calls on the Commission to take urgent action to ensure that such products are only put on the market after they have undergone comprehensive and adequate safety tests over their life cycle;
Amendment 58 #
2007/2252(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Commission to consider in a comprehensive assessment the ancillary benefits to all health in all EU climate change related policies, in particular clean energy, sustainable transport, sustainable consumption and production, including conservation or sustainable use of natural resources;
Amendment 60 #
2007/2252(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Reiterates that the Commission and the Member States should support the WHO Children’s Environment and Health Action Plan in Europe, to encourage it both through EU and bilateral development policy, and to encourage similar processes outside the WHO Europe Region;
Amendment 2 #
2007/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the percentage of women in the top grades of academia rarely exceeds 20% and men are three times more likely than women to obtain professorships or their equivalent,
Amendment 7 #
2007/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas highly gifted and talented girls are often not recognised as such, and therefore cannot realise their full potential in science and education; whereas the promotion of highly gifted girls is an important element in reaching the goal of 700,000 additional researchers as part of the Lisbon strategy,
Amendment 11 #
2007/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 12 #
2007/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Amendment 34 #
2007/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Encourages universities, research institutes and private businesses to adopt and enforce equality strategies in their organisations and to conduct gender impact evaluation in their decision making processes,;
Amendment 40 #
2007/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Criticises the unambitious and insufficient EU target of 25% of women in leading positions in public sector research;, reminds the Commission and the Member States that gender parity means at least 40% women;
Amendment 53 #
2007/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission and the Member States for positive actions to be taken to encourage female researchers and for further development of support and mentoring schemes, as well as targeted promotion policies with the goal of reaching gender parity; notes that simple measures like a sentence encouraging women in particular to apply has shown very positive results; however, also notes that measures such as obligatory targets for women researchers and professors are essential to achieve gender balance for women in science,
Amendment 58 #
2007/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to set up programmes of coaching and supporting young women scientists in participating in research programmes and grant applications in order to help them to stay in academia and research;
Amendment 220 #
2006/0136(COD)
Recital 27
(27) The principle of mutual recognition is one of the means of ensuring the free movement of goods within the Community. To avoid anunnecessary duplication of work, to reduce the administrative burden for industry and for Member States and to provide forfacilitate more harmonised availability of plant protection products, authorisations granted by one Member State should be acceptnotified byto other Member States where agricultural, plant health and environmental (including climatic) conditions are comparable. Therefore, the Community should be divided into zones with such comparable conditions in order to facilitate such mutual recognition. However, environmental or agricultural circumstances specific to the territory of a Member State might require that, on application, Member Statesin which the applicant wishes to put the product on the market. Those Member States should be entitled to recognise an authorisation issued by another Member State, amend it or refrain from authorising the plant protection product in their territory, if justified because of specific agricultural circumstancesor environmental circumstances, that may, but do not need to, be limited to that Member State, or if the high level of protection of both human andor animal health andor the environment set out in this Regulation can not be achieved, or to maintain a higher protection level in their territory in line with their National Pesticide Action Plan.
Amendment 231 #
2006/0136(COD)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
For residues which are of toxicological, ecotoxicological, environmental orof all approved substances, there shall be standardised methods in general use for measuring them which are sufficiently sensitive with respect to any technically detectable levels that could be present in any environmental and biological media or be of drinking water relevance, t. The residues shall be methods in general use for measuring themdetectable with the common multi-residue methods as applied by Community reference laboratories. Analytical standards shall be commonly available.
Amendment 247 #
2006/0136(COD)
Article 12 – paragraph 2 - subparagraph 2
Within 120 days of the end of the period provided for the submission of written comments, the Authority shall adopt a conclusion in the light of current scientific and technical knowledge using guidance documents available at the time of application on whether the active substance can be expected to meet the approval criteria provided for in Article 4 and shall communicate it to the applicant, the Member States and the Commission and shall make it available to the public. Where a consultation as provided for in the first subparagraph is organised, the 120-day period shall be extended by 60 days.
Amendment 250 #
2006/0136(COD)
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. An active substance complying with the criteria provided for in Article 4 shall be approved as a candidate for substitution if it meets one or more of the additional criteria laid down in point 4 of Annex II. By way of derogation from Article 14(2), the approval may be renewed once or more for a period not exceeding tenfive years.
Amendment 263 #
2006/0136(COD)
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 265 #
2006/0136(COD)
Article 31 – paragraph 3 – point (e)
Amendment 266 #
2006/0136(COD)
Article 31 – paragraph 3 – point (f)
Amendment 267 #
2006/0136(COD)
Article 31 – paragraph 3 – point (h)
Amendment 318 #
2006/0136(COD)
Annex II - point 3.7.1. – 3.7.1.1. – 3.7.1.2.
3.7.1. An active substance, safener or synergist shall only be approved where it, and its transformation products or residues, are not considered to be a persistent organic pollutants (POPs). A substance that fulfils all three of the criteria of the sections below is a POP. 3.7.1.1. Persistence An active substance, safener or synergist fulfils the persistence criterion where there is: - evidence that the time it takes for a degradation of 50 % (DT50) in water is greater than two months, or that its DT50 in soil is greater than six months, or that its DT50 in sediment is greater than six months.; or - evidence that the active substance is otherwise sufficiently persistent to be considered in the context of the POPs Convention; 3.7.1.2. Bioaccumulation An active substance, safener or synergist fulfils the bioaccumulation criterion where there is: - evidence that its bio-concentration factor or bio accumulation factor in aquatic species is greater than 52 000 or, in the absence of such data, that the partition coefficient n-octanol/water (log Ko/w) or the partition coefficient n-octanol/air (log Ko/a) is greater than 5; or - evidence that the active substance, safener or synergist present other reasons for concern, such as high bioaccumulation in other non-target species, high toxicity or ecotoxicity. ; or - evidence based on monitoring data in biota indicating that the bio-accumulation potential of the active substance is sufficient for it to be considered under the POPs Convention.
Amendment 13 #
2006/0132(COD)
Citation 1
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 152(4) and 175(1) thereof,
Amendment 14 #
2006/0132(COD)
Recital 1
(1) In line with Articles 2 and 7 of Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme, this Directive establishes a common legal framework for achieving a sustainable use of pesticides should be established, taking account of the precautionary principle.
Amendment 15 #
2006/0132(COD)
Recital 2
(2) At present, this Directive should apply to pesticides which are plant protection products. However, it is anticipated that the scope of this Directive will be extended to cover biocidal products by 2012.
Amendment 16 #
2006/0132(COD)
Recital 4
(4) National Action Plans aimed at setting quantitative objectives, targets, measures, indicators and timetables to reduce risks and impacts of pesticide use onpesticide use and the risks to human health and the environment and at encouraging the development and introduction of Integrated Pest Management and of alternative non-chemical approaches or techniques in order to reduce dependency on the use of pesticides should be used by Member States in order to facilitate the implementation of this Directive. National Action Plans mayshould be coordinated with implementation plans under other relevant Community legislation and could be used for grouping together objectives to be achieved under other Community legislation related to pesticides.
Amendment 18 #
2006/0132(COD)
Recital 9
(9) Considering the possible risks from the use of pesticides, in particular their acute and chronic health effects and their environmental effects, consumers and the general public should be better informed on the overall impacts of the use of pesticides particularly through the media but also through awareness- raising campaigns, information passed on through retailers and other appropriate measures about both the health and environmental risk and short and long-term adverse effects related to the use of pesticides and about non-chemical alternatives. Member States should monitor and collect data on impacts of pesticide use, including poisoning incidents, and promote long- term research programmes on the effects of pesticide use.
Amendment 21 #
2006/0132(COD)
Recital 12
(12) Aerial spraying of pesticides has the potential to cause significant adverse impacts on human health and the environment, in particular from spray drift. Therefore, aerial spraying should generally be prohibited with derogations possible where it represents clear advantages in terms of reduced impacts on human health and the environment in comparison with other spraying methods, or where there are no viable alternatives, provided that the best available technology to reduce drift is used (e.g. low-drift nozzles) and the health of residents or bystanders is not affected.
Amendment 22 #
2006/0132(COD)
Recital 14
(14) Use of pesticides can be particularly dangerous in very sensitive areas, such as Natura 2000 sites protected in accordance with Directives 79/409/EEC and 92/43/EEC. In other places such as residential areas, public parks, sports grounds or children's playgroundsand recreation grounds, school grounds and children's playgrounds, and in the vicinity of public healthcare facilities (clinics, hospitals, rehabilitation centres, health resorts, hospices), the risks from exposure to pesticides of the general public are high. Use of pesticides in those areas should, therefore, be prohibited, restricted or the risks arising from such use minimised.
Amendment 24 #
2006/0132(COD)
Recital 16
(16) The application of general principles and crop and sector specific guidelines of Integrated Pest Management by all farmers would result in a better targeted use of all available pest control measures, including pesticides. Therefore, it contributes to a further reduction of the risks to human health and the environment and the dependency on the usereduction of pesticides use. Member States should promote low pesticide-input pest management, in particular Integrated Pest Management, and establish the necessary conditions and measures for its implementation. Additionally, Member States should implement mandatory crop- specific standards of Integrated Pest Management. Member States should use economic instruments for the promotion of Integrated Pest Management to provide advice and training for farmers, and to reduce the risks of pesticide use. A levy on pesticide products should be considered as one of the measures to finance the implementation of general and crop- specific methods and practices of Integrated Pest Management and the increase of land under organic farming.
Amendment 30 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 1
This Directive establishes a framework to achieve a sustainable use of pesticides by reducing their use and the risks and impacts of pesticide use on human health and the environment in line with the precautionary principle and promoting the use of Integrated Pest Management and of alternative approaches or technique, giving priority to non-chemical methods.
Amendment 31 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States may provide subsidies or take fiscal measures to encourage the use of less harmful pesticides. This may include the introduction of a pesticides levy on all products except non-chemical products or low-risk plant protection products as defined in Article [50(1)] of Regulation (EC) No ... [concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market].
Amendment 32 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. The provisions of this Directive shall not prevent Member States from applying the precautionary principle in restricting or prohibiting the use of pesticides.
Amendment 33 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 3 – point 1 a (new)
1a) "use" means all operations carried out with a pesticide, such as storage, handling, dilution, mixing, and application;
Amendment 39 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 3 – point 9 a (new)
9a) "use reduction" means reduction of applications of pesticides and is not necessarily dependent on volume;
Amendment 41 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 3 – point 9 b (new)
9b) "treatment index" is based on the fixed standard dose of active substance per hectare needed for one treatment against the pest in question. Therefore, it is not necessarily dependent on volume and can be used to evaluate use reduction.
Amendment 42 #
Amendment 44 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Member States shall adopt, and implement without undue delay, National Action Plans to set up targets, measures and timetables to reduce risks, including hazards, and impacts of pesticide use on human health and the environment and to encouragsure the development and introduction of integrated pest management and of alternative approaches or techniques, giving priority to non-chemical methods of plant protection and pest and crop management, in order to reduce dependency on and the use of pesticides. The National Action Plans shall as a minimum include: (a) for other than biological pesticides and low-risk plant protection products as defined in Article [50(1)] of Regulation (EC) No ... [concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market], quantitative use reduction targets measured as a treatment index. The treatment index will be adapted to the specific conditions of each Member State. The treatment index will have to be communicated immediately to the Commission for its approval. For active substances of very high concern the reduction target shall be a reduction of at least 50% in relation to the treatment index calculated for the year 2005 by the end of 2013, unless the Member State can prove that it has already achieved a comparable or higher target based on another year of reference from the period 1995-2004; (b) for pesticide formulations classified as toxic or very toxic pursuant to Directive 1999/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 1999 concerning the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations1, a quantitative use reduction target measured as sold volumes. This target shall be a reduction of at least 50% calculated in relation to the year 2005 by the end of 2013, unless the Member State can prove that it has already achieved a comparable or higher reduction target based on another year of reference from the period 1995-2004. Member States shall establish a mechanism for financing the introduction of the National Action Plans. 1 OJ L 200, 30.7.1999, p. 1.
Amendment 49 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. By ...*, Member States shall adopt background reports in accordance with Annex IIa with the objective of identifying national trends in pesticide use and risks and the priority areas and crops to be addressed in the National Action Plan. * One year after the entry into force of this Directive.
Amendment 51 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
National Action Plans shall be reviewed at least every five years and any substantial changes to National Action Plans shall be reported to the Commission without undue delay. three years and, depending on the attainment of objectives, updated. Monitoring shall also include an analysis of whether the risks in the Action Plan are appropriately taken into account or if they need to be reassessed. Any changes to National Action Plans and the findings of the monitoring shall be reported to the Commission without undue delay. The Commission shall establish an Internet portal to inform the public about the National Action Plans, any changes and the results of their implementation.
Amendment 52 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Where relevant, tThe Commission shall make information communicated in accordance with paragraph 2 available to the public on the Internet.
Amendment 53 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States shall ensure that professional users, distributors and advisers are aware of the existence and risks of illegal (counterfeit) plant protection products, and are properly trained to identify such products.
Amendment 57 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 7
1. Member States shall take measures to inform the general public and to promote and facilitate information and awareness- raising programmes and the availability of accurate and balanced information relating to pesticides for the general public, in particular regarding the risks, including hazards, and the potential acute and chronic effects for human health, non-target organisms and the environment andrising from their use, and to the use of non-chemical alternatives. 2. Member States shall put in place mandatory systems for gathering information on pesticide acute and chronic poisoning incidents, especially among pesticide operators, workers, residents and any other groups that may be exposed to pesticides regularly. 3. Member States shall regularly monitor and collect information on indicator species exposed to pesticides and on pesticides in the environment, such as in fresh and marine waters, soil and air, and report on this information regularly to the Commission. 4. Member States shall carry out research programmes into specific situations where pesticides have been linked to impacts on human health and the environment, including studies on high-risk groups, biological diversity and combination effects. 5. To enhance comparability of information, the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, shall develop by ...* a strategic guidance document on monitoring and surveying of impacts of pesticide use on human health and the environment. * Three years after the entry into force of this Directive.
Amendment 60 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 8 - paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that pesticide application equipment and accessories in professional use shall be subject to mandatory inspections at regular intervals. The interval between inspections shall not exceed five years until 202015 and shall not exceed three years thereafter.
Amendment 62 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 8 - paragraph 3 – point b
Amendment 64 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 9 - paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the pesticides used must be explicitly approvuthorised for aerial spraying by the Member State following a specific assessment addressing risks from aerial spraying; substances classified as very toxic (R50) to aquatic organisms shall not be authorised for aerial spraying;
Amendment 65 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 9 - paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) the area to be sprayed must not be in close proximity to public or residential areas and there must be no effects on the health of residents or bystanders;
Amendment 66 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 9 - paragraph 2 – point d b (new)
(db) the aerial craft must be equipped with the best available technology to reduce spray drift (e.g. low-drift nozzles); where helicopters are used, the spray booms must be equipped with injection jets to reduce drift.
Amendment 71 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 9 - paragraph 3
3. Member States shall designate the authorities competent for establishing the specific conditions by which aerial spraying may be carried out and. The competent authority is responsible for authorising aerial spraying following a request pursuant to paragraph 4 and for makeing public information on crops, areas, circumstances and particular requirements for application including weather conditions where aerial spraying may be allowed. TIn the authorisation the competent authorities shall specify the measures necessary for warning residents and bystanders in good time and to protect the environment in the vicinity of the area sprayed.
Amendment 72 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 9 - paragraph 4
4. A professional user wishing to apply pesticides by aerial spraying shall submit a request in due time to the competent authority to apply pesticides by aerial spraying accompanied by evidence to show that the conditions referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 are fulfilled. Member States may provide that requests for which no answer was received on the decisiThe notification shall con taken within the time period laid down by the competein information about the time of spraying and the amounts authorities shall be deemed to bend the type of pesticides approvlied.
Amendment 73 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 9 - paragraph 6
6. The competent authorities shall keep records of the requests submitted under paragraph 4 and shall make them available to the public.
Amendment 75 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 10
1. Member States shall ensure that appropriate measures to protect the aquatic environment and drinking water supplies from the impact of pesticides are adopted. These measures shall support and be compatible with relevant provisions of Directive 2000/60/EC and Regulation (EC) No …. 2. The measuretake the necessary action to protect bodies of water, in particular by ensuring that buffer zones, where pesticides must not be applied or stored, are established on fields adjacent to water courses, and in particular to safeguard zones for the abstraction of drinking water established in accordance with Article 7(3) of Directive 2000/60/EC. The dimensions of the buffer zones shall be defined as a function of the risks of pollution and the agricultural and climate characteristics of the area concerned. Furthermore Member States shall ensure that, in safeguard zones for the abstraction of drinking water in accordance with Article 7(3) of Directive 2000/60/EC, additional measures are taken to prevent contamination of water with pesticides including, where necessary, tighter restrictions on use of some high-risk products, enhanced use of buffer zones, specific training and awareness of advisers and spray operators, and strict enforcement of best practice in filling, mixing and disposal of pesticides. Member States may establish any pesticide-free zones they deem necessary in order to safeguard drinking water resources. Such pesticide-free zones may cover the entire Member State. 2. In addition to the actions provided for in paragraph 1 shall include, Member States shall take the following measures: (a) giving preference to pesticides that are not classified as dangerous for the aquatic environment pursuant to Directive 1999/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 1999 concerning the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations nor containing priority hazardous substances as set in Article 16(3) of Directive 2000/60/EC; (b) giving preference to the most efficient application techniques such as the use of low-drift pesticide application equipment especially in vertical crops such as hops and those found in orchards and vineyards; (c) use of mitigation measures which minimise the risk of off-site pollution caused by spray drift, drain-flow and run- off. These shall include when necessary the establishment of appropriately-sized buffer zones for the protection of non- target aquatic organisms and safeguard zones for surface and groundwater used for the abstraction of drinking water, where pesticides must not be used or stored; (d) reducing as far as possible or if appropriate eliminating applications on or along roads, railway lines, very permeable surfaces or other infrastructure close to surface water or groundwater or on sealed surfaces with a high risk of run-off into surface water or sewage systems.
Amendment 81 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 11 –title - introductory part and point 1
Reduction of pesticide use orand risks in specificensitive areas Member States shall, having due regard tofor the necessary hygiene and public health requirements and biodiversity, or the results of relevant risk assessments, ensure that the use of pesticides is prohibited, or restricted tor the risks arising from such use minimisedminimum necessary, in: 1) all areas used by the general public or by vulnerable populations, such as groups, at least in residential areas, parks, public gardens, sports and recreation grounds, school grounds and playgrounds; and in the vicinity of public healthcare facilities (clinics, hospitals, rehabilitation centres, health resorts, hospices) as well as in substantial no-spray zones including in fields around these areas.
Amendment 84 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take appropriate measuresll necessary measures, including the use of economic instruments, to promote low pesticide- input pest management, giving priority wherever possible to non-chemical methods and otherwisof plant protection and pest and crop management, and to ensure that professional users of pesticides switch as quickly as possible to practices and products with the lowest risk to human health and the environment among those available for the same pest problem. Low pesticide-input pest management includes Integrated Pest Management as well as organic farming according to Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products.
Amendment 87 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall establish or support the establishment of all necessary conditions for the implementation of Integrated Pest Management and non- chemical methods of plant protection and pest and crop management. In particular, they shall ensure that professional users have at their disposal information, training and tools for pest monitoring and decision making, as well as advisory services on integrated pest management. and non- chemical methods of plant protection and pest and crop management, and shall draw up descriptions of the best integrated crop protection practices, assigning priority to non-chemical crop protection.
Amendment 88 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 13 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall establish appropriate incentives, training and financial measures to encourage professional users to implement crop or sector specific guidelines for integrated pest management on a voluntary basis. Public authorities and/or organisations representing particular professional users may draw up such guidelines. Member States shall. Member States shall take into account the general criteria as described in Annex IIIa and refer to those guidelines that they consider pertinent and appropriate in their National Action Plans drawn up in accordance with Article 4.
Amendment 89 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 13 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. The general standards for Integrated Pest Management shall be developed in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article [58] of Regulation (EC) No ... [concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market], with public participation of interested stakeholders.
Amendment 90 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Harmonizsed risk indicators as referred to in Annex IV shall be established. HoweverUntil those indicators are adopted, Member States may continue to use existing national indicators or adopt other appropriate indicators in addition to the harmonized ones.
Amendment 92 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall communicate the results of the evaluations carried out pursuant to paragraph 2 to the Commission and to other Member States and shall make this information available to the public.
Amendment 93 #
2006/0132(COD)
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
The results shall be made available to the general public via the Internet portal referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 4(2).
Amendment 103 #
2006/0132(COD)
Annex I – paragraph 6
6. Procedures for preparing pesticide application equipment for work, including its calibration, and for its operation with minimum risks to the user, other humans, non-target animal and plant species, biodiversity and, the environment and water resources..
Amendment 104 #
2006/0132(COD)
Annex I – paragraph 8
8. Emergency action to protect human health and, the environment and water resources in case of accidental spillage and, contamination and extreme weather events that would result in pesticides leaching risks.
Amendment 105 #
2006/0132(COD)
Annex I – paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Special care in protection areas established under Articles 6 and 7 of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Amendment 106 #
2006/0132(COD)
Annex II a (new)
Amendment 107 #
2006/0132(COD)
Annex II b (new)
Amendment 108 #
2006/0132(COD)
Annex III a (new)