2 Amendments of Daniel FREUND related to 2018/2168(DEC)
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Emphasises that Parliament backed the Ombudsman’s proposals in a plenary vote related to the Ombudsman's recommendations to theand suggestions to Council to allow the public to follow the EU legislative process of the Union more easily (transparency of the Council legislative process, OI/2/2017/TE); recalls that the Council should, among other things, systematically record the position of each Member State in Council preparatory bodies, and shouldevelop clear and publicly available criteria for the designation of documents as ‘LIMITE’, in line with Union law, and develop a dedicated webpage for each legislative proposal and improve the user-friendliness of the public register of documents;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Reiterates that the Council ought to be transparent and fully accountable to Union citizens for the funds entrusted to it as a Union institution; recalls the relevant judgments of the European Court of Justice (in particular T-540/15) 1a and the paper from the Dutch COSAC delegation, 'Opening up closed doors: Making the EU more transparent for its citizens', confirming this obligation; _________________ 1a Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2018, Emilio De Capitani v European Parliament, T-549/15, ECLI:EU:T:2018:167.