5 Amendments of Andrey NOVAKOV related to 2015/2327(INI)
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Invites the Commission and, respectively, DG EAC and EACEA to enable further promotion of decentralised actions such as Key Action 2 by proposing adequate and proportional to the size of the actions funding;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Notes that Erasmus+ implementation in EU's regions reveals different funding demands and intervention priorities which require some Member States to refocus the programme intervention to ensure cost-effectiveness of the money spent;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Is concerned by NAs' difficulties in interpretation and application of programme rules; recalls that 82% of Erasmus+ budget is managed under decentralised actions; calls on the Commission to streamline definitions and improve guidance on decentralised actions in order to ensure best results for the EU budget and avoid error rates;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the simplified financial management and the use of unit cost system; notes that due to regulatory requirements some Member States cannot apply it or find cost levels inadequate as compared to actual cost; is concerned that NAs' report higher audit burden;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Supports increased effectiveness and efficiency through larger-scale projects; notes, however, that there has to be balance between small and large groups of applicants;