3 Amendments of Philippe DE BACKER related to 2013/0025(COD)
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Member States should have the possibility to designate an appropriate self- regulatory body of the professions referred to in Article 2(1)(3)(a),(b), and (d) and (e) and those professions and categories of undertaking referred to in article 4 as the authority to be informed in the first instance in place of the FIU. In line with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, a system of first instance reporting to a self-regulatory body constitutes an important safeguard to uphold the protection of fundamental rights as concerns the reporting obligations applicable to lawyers.
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. For the purposes of this Section, ‘third parties’ shall mean (a) obliged entities who are listed in Article 2, or ; and (b)other institutions and persons situated in Member States or a third country, who apply customer due diligence requirements and record keeping requirements equivalent to those laid down in this Directive and their compliance with the requirements of this Directive is supervised in accordance with Section 2 of Chapter VI.; and (c) self-regulatory bodies as defined in article 33; and (d) member organisations and or federations performing due diligence on their members;
Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
By way of derogation from Article 32(1), Member States may, in the case of the persons referred to in Article 2(1)(3)(a), (b), (d) and (d)e) and those professions and categories of undertaking referred to in Article 4, designate an appropriate self- regulatory body of the profession concerned as the authority to receive the information referred to in Article 32(1).