4 Amendments of Anthea McINTYRE related to 2013/2127(INI)
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas the establishment of EFPs can help to boost productivity, improve performance, support the alignment of employee and shareholders' interests and attract and retain key personnel;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas EFP is affected by national taxation rules, and whereas it is not appropriate to develop a comprehensive ‘one size fits all’ model for EFP at EU level; whereas EFP must be carefully decided upon by the individual company and its workers taking due account of the wider national and sectoral context; whereas, however, a corea set of basic principlguidelines could achieve public confidence and help EFP deliver on its objectives;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Encourages the Commission to present an independent impact assessment and a study on such a ‘29th regime’ for EFP;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 – introductory part
Paragraph 11 – introductory part
11. Calls on the Commission, following the publication of the independent impact assessment and study, and in cooperation with employee ownership organisations, the Member States and, where appropriate, the social partners to develop a non-binding framework concept on basic principlconsider, developing a set of non-binding basic guidelines for successful EFP schemes encompassing the following elements: