Activities of Eva ORTIZ VILELLA
Plenary speeches (5)
Discharge 2012 (debate)
Presentation of the Court of Auditors' annual report - 2012 (debate)
2011 discharge
2011 discharge (continuation of debate)
Presentation of the Court of Auditors’ annual report - 2011 (debate)
Reports (2)
REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2011, Section I – European Parliament PDF (288 KB) DOC (278 KB)
REPORT on Special Report No 7/2012 (2011 discharge): 'The reform of the common organisation of the market in wine: Progress to date' PDF (147 KB) DOC (71 KB)
Shadow reports (2)
REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2012, Section I – European Parliament PDF (327 KB) DOC (225 KB)
REPORT on: Are tools in place to monitor the effectiveness of European Social Fund spending on older workers? (Court of Auditors Special Report 25/2012) PDF (181 KB) DOC (97 KB)
Written declarations (1)
Amendments (108)
Amendment 10 #
2013/2238(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. RegretObserves that one contract related to the design of a financial database was subdivided into four lots of EUR 60 000 each, which were all directly awarded to two companies; is of the opinion that given the total value of the services to be procured for the same project (EUR 240 000), an open or restricted procedure should have been applied and that the related commitments and payments are thus irregular; acknowledges that according to the response provided by the Authority, the four lots concerned were awarded in full compliance with the procurement procedure for low value contracts of Article 129(1) of the Implementing Rules of the Financial Regulation;
Amendment 2 #
2013/2196(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas Parliament’s annual discharge procedure provides added value, involving as it does a thorough examination of the accounts, the object being to enable Parliament to fulfil its responsibility to Union citizens and to act with complete transparency by giving them a detailed insight into its financial management; whereas, secondly, it affords an opportunity for self-criticism and to do better in those areas in which there is still room for improvement in terms of quality, efficiency, and effectiveness in the management of public finances and hence of taxpayers’ money;
Amendment 10 #
2013/2196(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Points out the high level of carry-overs into 2012 (EUR 244 600 38423[1]) and calls for the improvedurges that the planning of expenditure be improved; __________________ 23 Automatic carry-overs: EUR 222 900 384, non-automatic carry-overs: EUR 21 700 000.
Amendment 55 #
2013/2196(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48 b (new)
Paragraph 48 b (new)
48b. Calls on the administration to apply further smart cost-cutting measures, to enable savings to be made without impairing the effectiveness, efficiency, and quality of parliamentary activities;
Amendment 61 #
2013/2196(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49 d (new)
Paragraph 49 d (new)
49d. Points out that over 1 500 members of Parliament’s staff have children enrolled at the European Schools; and maintains that Parliament has to play a leading role within the organisational structure of the Schools;
Amendment 69 #
2013/2196(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Subtitle and paragraph 53 c (new)
Subtitle and paragraph 53 c (new)
Travel agency 53c. Welcomes the fact that, as called for by the Committee on Budgetary Control, the new travel agency contract, which entered into force on 1 January 2014, allows financial and performance audits to be carried out; notes that the only company to bid for the contract was BCD Travel N.V., the agency which held the previous contract, and that the present contract is to run for two years;
Amendment 83 #
2013/2196(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 58 a (new)
Paragraph 58 a (new)
58a. Notes that, on 22 October 2012, the Bureau fundamentally endorsed the concept for the permanent exhibition at the House of European History;
Amendment 90 #
2013/2196(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 63
Paragraph 63
63. Takes note that repairing the ceiling support frame in Parliament’s Brussels Chamber will involve costs just above EUR 2 million, a figure below the EUR 3 million estimated, and that due to the age of the building, no legal proceedings could subsequently be undertaken; acknowledges that the regular on-going inspection and preventive maintenance policy for Parliament’s buildings introduced in 2012 detected the structural defects in the wooden ceiling beams thus preventing a major disaster, potentially including loss of life and huge damage to the building in question; takes note that it was possible to relocate the services displaced to Parliament’s other buildings, with zone A of the Paul-Henri Spaak (PHS) being temporarily closed and that the Chamber should be available for use again at the beginning of April 2014;
Amendment 97 #
2013/2196(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 66 a (new)
Paragraph 66 a (new)
66a. Maintains that Parliament must have the final say in all ICT-related matters;
Amendment 6 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Grants the Commission discharge/Postpones its decision on granting the Commission discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2012;
Amendment 27 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Heading 1
Heading 1
Amendment 37 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Heading 1- Subheading 1
Heading 1- Subheading 1
Amendment 42 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 45 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. RecallNotes that in the 2012 financial year the rapporteur and shadow rapporteurs for the discharge to the Commission called for more stringent financial corrections to be imposed on those Member States whose auditmanagement and monitoring systems display persistent and systematic weaknesses;
Amendment 63 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses thatUrges the Commission to continue to focus on the application of net financial corrections in the field of agriculture does not yet constitute the anticipated progress, as (a) the Commission’s existing internal rules already stipulate that the duration of conformity procedures must not exceed two yearsas laid down in the internal rules relating to agriculture and (b)in the so-called ‘new’ criteria and methodology for applying financial corrections mentioned in Annex I to the Communication refer explicitly to guidelines that will be based on the existing ones adopted by the Commission as long ago as 23 December 1997new rules for cohesion policy for the 2014-2020 period;
Amendment 67 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 73 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 81 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Heading 1 - Subheading 4
Heading 1 - Subheading 4
Amendment 92 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. ObserveRegrets that in the 2012 financial year the error rate rose for the third time in succession, partly owing to a change in the methodology used;
Amendment 95 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Is not prepared to accept the situation that for yearsEmphasises that the majority of the errors identified by the Court ought to be have been identified by the Member States themselves; considers, therefore, that in some Member States the audit results and procedures constitute an inadequate basis for assessments and financial corrections by the Commission;
Amendment 104 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Observes that the error rate in the field of rural development is 7.9 %; iexpresses concerned th at the Commission does not anticipquality of audits in some Member States any improvement in the situation before 2014, although an action plan was adopted ind that the comprehensive action plan drawn up by the Commission will be unable to make any significant impact on the residual error rate until at least the end of 20123;
Amendment 112 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Points out with concern that, in particular that, despite decisions on flat-rate corrections, the errors detected in 2006 in France and Portugal were still not fully remedied in 2012; stresses that from 2006 to 2013 direct payments were made whose legality and regularity were not fully guaranteed and highlights that European tax-payers’ money has been paid to final beneficiaries without a legal basis and without being recovered;
Amendment 168 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
Amendment 200 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 58
Paragraph 58
58. Notes that the 2012 accounts record a EUR 1.8 billion financial correction on the 2000-2006 use of cohesion policy funds in Spain, which corresponds to 49 % of the total corrections in 2012; regretwelcomes and accepts the explanations offered by the Spanish authorities to the Committee on Budgetary Control in respect of this correction and recalls that, in accordance with current rules, the authorities in Spain weare entitled to further funding amounting to EUR 1 390 million;
Amendment 249 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 104
Paragraph 104
104. States with deep concern that the Court found systemic deficiencies in the LPIS audited in Italy and Spain in 2008, 2009 and 2010 and that since 2007 deficiencies were found in the LPIS of 12 Member States1; notes the reply by the Commission and the Spanish authorities to the effect that, despite the limited extent of the deficiencies, an error correction system is being applied, involving the incorporation of an eligibility coefficient into regulation of the next period; __________________ 1 Lithuania, Slovakia, Cyprus, Malta, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, France, Greece, Portugal, Austria, Sweden (see the annual reports of the ECA since 2007).
Amendment 254 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 115
Paragraph 115
115. Notes with concern that the weaknesses detected in 2012 in the above- mentioned Member States were very similar to those found and reported in the six different Member States which were audited in 2011 (Denmark, Spain, Italy, Hungary, Austria and Finland);
Amendment 284 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 136
Paragraph 136
Amendment 302 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 151
Paragraph 151
151. Stresses that, according to statistics from the 2012 activity report of DG REGIO, risk-affected payments ranged between EUR 755.8 million (minimum) and 1 706.8 million (maximum); observes that, in this context, the Commission expressed 61 reservations for programmes or parts thereof and 25 reputation reservations, primarily concerning Spain, Sweden, European territorial cooperation and the Czech Republic; impresses on the Commission that it needs to continue to pursue the greatest possible simplification in order to avoid to the maximum any possibility of error;
Amendment 314 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 157
Paragraph 157
Amendment 330 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 158
Paragraph 158
Amendment 351 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 171
Paragraph 171
171. Regrets that the 2012 activity report of DG EMPL contains a reservation relating to EUR 68 million of the payments made for the 2007-2013 programming period, pertaining to 27 out of 117 operational programmes (Spain 9, Italy 4, United Kingdom 3) and insists on the need for simplification;
Amendment 354 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 175
Paragraph 175
Amendment 356 #
2013/2195(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 177
Paragraph 177
Amendment 1 #
2013/2173(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas several years of economic and financial crisis have meant that the European Social Fund’s (ESF) measures are more important than ever as one of the tools for tackling high unemployment, and lessons learned from implementing previous measures will be vital when the new programmes are put in place from 2014;
Amendment 3 #
2013/2173(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas older workers account for less than 5 % of participants in the lifelong learning activities of the ESF, which is evidence of lower levels of participation in training programmes but not of a lack of training or qualifications on the part of those workers;
Amendment 4 #
2013/2173(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
Amendment 6 #
2013/2173(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Regrets the fact that in the OPs for the period 2007-2013, the definition of ‘older workers’ is not used consistently; notes that many MAs do not use in their respective OPs the definition of ‘older workers’ as defined in the Lisbon Agenda, namely any person of working age between 55 and 64 years old, but instead use different age groups;
Amendment 9 #
2013/2173(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that no priority theme dealing with initiatives for older workers, such as ‘encouraging active ageing and prolonging working lives’, is included in the OPs for the period 2007-2013, mainly because of differing interpretations of the form a priority of this kind should take;
Amendment 14 #
2013/2173(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Is concerned about the fact that, in the OPs for the period under assessment, ‘older workers’, although identified as a target group, did not always have their own indicators or target values, leading to a situation where it is difficult or even impossible to assess the effectiveness of the measures addressing the needs of older workers; notes that, when indicators are in fact present in projects, they refer mostly to output such as the number of participants, and results rather than to any specific impacts;
Amendment 16 #
2013/2173(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes the fact that the new focus of the Common Strategic Framework funds for the next programming period 2014-2020 is on results, under which any measure proposed must be designed to achieve a specific objective;
Amendment 17 #
2013/2173(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Stresses that setting clear priorities in the new programmes with a view to achieving results will enable synergies to be found between the various funds and other sources of financing, thereby helping to ensure that measures to achieve the proposed objectives are as effective as possible at both national and transnational level;
Amendment 18 #
2013/2173(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Believes it necessary for the indicators used under the new OPs to include alerts in respect of financial and physical factors, and welcomes the fact that these are subject to special monitoring so that the reasons for any deviation from a given threshold in respect of the programmed objectives is analysed by the evaluation unit in cooperation with the intermediary bodies for the programmes, with a view to determining whether the deviations are caused by temporary situations or structural problems requiring more in-depth analysis or, where necessary, modifications to the programme;
Amendment 19 #
2013/2173(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 d (new)
Paragraph 9 d (new)
9d. Believes it also necessary to monitor whether or not changes occur in the socio-economic context and in the national and/or Community priorities, and whether problems arise when the programmes are being implemented which require a programme to be evaluated and substantially modified;
Amendment 89 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 90 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
That list shall be include the pests listed in Part A of Annex I to Directive 2000/29/EC and Section I of Part A of Annex II to that Directived in Annex Ia .
Amendment 91 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall amend the implementing act referred to in paragraph 2, under the terms of Article 98, be authorised to adopt delegated acts modifying the annex, where an assessment shows that a pest not listed in that actnnex fulfils the conditions referred to in Article 3(b), (c) and (d) in respect of the Union territory, or a pest listed in that act no longer fulfils one or more of those conditions. In the first case it shall add the pest concerned to the list referred to in paragraph 2, in the second case it shall delete the pest concerned from that list.
Amendment 93 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 94 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall amend the implementing act referred to in paragraph 2, by means of a delegated act, amend the list by amending the scientific name of a pest, where such an amendment is justified by the development of scientific knowledge.
Amendment 95 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 96 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 98 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Where the results of an assessment show that a Union quarantine pest fulfils the conditions referred to in paragraph 1, or a pest no longer fulfils one or more of those conditions, the Commission shall amend the implementing ac, under the terms of Article 98, be authorised to adopt delegated acts modifying the list referred to in the first subparagraph by adding the pest concerned to, or removing it from, that list.
Amendment 119 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
As regards priority pests whose presence in one Member state could have impacts for neighbouring Member States, the simulation exercises shallmay be carried out together by the Member States concerned on the basis of their respective contingency plans.
Amendment 120 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 4
Article 25 – paragraph 4
Amendment 122 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission may, by means of implementingshall, under the terms of Article 98, be authorised to adopt delegated acts, to set out measures against specific Union quarantine pests. Those measures shall implement, specifically for each of the pest(s) concerned, one or more of the following provisions:
Amendment 123 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 5
Article 27 – paragraph 5
5. The implementingdelegated acts referred to in paragraph 1 may provide that the measures, referred to in points (a) to (j) of paragraph 1, taken by the Member States are to be repealed or amended. Until a measure has been adopted by the Commission, the Member State may maintain the measures that it has employed.
Amendment 125 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Where a quarantine pest is present in the Union territory but not present in the Member State concerned, and is not a Union quarantine pest, the Commission may, upon application of that Member State pursuant to paragraph 4, recognise the territory of that Member State as a protected zone in accordance with paragraph 3.
Amendment 126 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point f
Amendment 127 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 37 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 128 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 37 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 129 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 37 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall amend the implementing act referred to in paragraph 2list by means of a delegated act, where an assessment shows that a pest not listed in that act fulfils the conditions referred to in Article 36, a pest listed in that implementing act no longer fulfils one or more of those conditions or where amendments to that list are necessary, as regards categories referred to in paragraph 4 or thresholds referred to in paragraph 5.
Amendment 130 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – title
Article 40 – title
Amendment 131 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 40 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall adopt an implementing act, containing the plants, plant products and other objects, and the prohibiauthorisations and containment measures and the third countries concerned, as set out in Part A of Annex III to Directive 2000/29/EC. The containment measures shall meet special or equivalent requirements.
Amendment 132 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Article 40 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
The criteria for drawing up the abovementioned list shall be established through the adoption of delegated acts.
Amendment 133 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 40 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
In case a plant, plant product or other object, originating in or being dispatched from a third country, poses a phytosanitary risk of an unacceptable level by its likelihood to host a Union quarantine pest, and that risk cannot be reduced to an acceptable level by applying one or more of the measures set out in points 2 and 3 of Section 1 of Annex IV on measures and principles for the management of the risks of pests, the Commission shall amend, as appropriate, the implementing act referred to in paragraph 1, to include in it that plant, plant product or other object and the third countries, concerned.
Amendment 134 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 40 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In case a plant, plant product or other object not included in that implementing act does not pose a phytosanitary risk of an unacceptable level, or it poses such a risk but that risk can be reduced to an acceptable level by applying one or more of the measures set out in points 2 and 3 of Section 1 of Annex IV on measures to manage the risks and pathways of quarantine pests, the Commission shall amend that implementing act, as appropriate, to include in it the plant, plant product or other object and the third country concerned. Those measures, along with those referred to in paragraph 1, are hereinafter referred to as ‘special requirements’. Those measures may take the form of specific requirements, adopted in accordance with Article 42(1), for the introduction into the Union territory of particular plants, plant products or other objects, which are equivalent to special requirements for the movement of those plants, plant products or other objects within the Union territory (hereinafter: 'equivalent requirements').
Amendment 135 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 3
Article 40 – paragraph 3
3. A plant, plant product or other object listed in the implementing act provided for in paragraph 1 shall notmay be introduced into the Union territory from the third country, concerned by that listing.
Amendment 136 #
Amendment 137 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 42 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Equivalent requirements, as referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 41(2) shall be set out, by means of an implementing actThe Commission shall, with a view to drawing-up the list referred to in Article 40, be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 98 in order to establish the equivalent requirements as referred to in Article 40, on request of a particular third country, if all of the following conditions are fulfilled:
Amendment 138 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 3
Article 42 – paragraph 3
Amendment 139 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States andshall ensure that international transport operators shall make information available to passengers concerning the prohibitions, set out pursuant tolist of plants, plant products and other objects under Article 40(3), the requirements, set out pursuant to Articles 41(1) and 42(2), and the exemptions, set out pursuant to Article 70(2), as regards the introduction of plants, plant products and other objects into the Union territory.
Amendment 140 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
That information shallmay be provided in the form of posters or brochures, which, where appropriate, shall be made available through the internet.
Amendment 141 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
a) they are grown or produced in areas of third countries in the vicinity of their land border with Member States (hereinafter: '‘third country frontier zones'’);
Amendment 142 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – title
Article 45 – title
Amendment 143 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Amendment 144 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
b) they are packed and moved in such a way that there is no risk of spreading of Union quarantine pests during their introduction into, and passing through, the Union territory, using an officially-approved phytosanitary seal that serves to guarantee the original packaging and means of transport (sealed lorry) and prevents the shipment being split up, hence providing official assurance of risk-free phytosanitary transit through the EU;
Amendment 145 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
c) they are introduced into, passed through and, without delay, moved out of the Union territory under official control by the competent authorities concerned. and under the supervision of customs officers. The competent authority of the Member State where those plants, plant products or other objects are introduced into, or for the first time moved within, the Union territory shall inform the competent authorities of all other Member States through which those plants, plant products or other objects are to be moved prior to being moved out of the Union territory.
Amendment 146 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) Plants, plant products and other objects in phytosanitary transit through Union territory from one third country to another must satisfy the plant health requirements under Article 40, without prejudice to other applicable plant health rules.
Amendment 147 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c b (new)
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c b (new)
(cb) In accordance with subparagraph (ca), the competent authority of the Member State where those plants, plant products or other objects are introduced into, or for the first time moved within, the Union territory, must perform the documentary check on that introduction and shall be responsible for the sealing of goods pursuant to subparagraph (b).
Amendment 148 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c c (new)
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c c (new)
(cc) Similarly, the competent authority of the Member State from which the goods are moved out of Union territory shall inform the competent authorities of the Member State into which they have been introduced, and the Member State/s through which they have moved, of the fact that the goods have been moved out of Union territory.
Amendment 149 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 153 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
Article 68 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
d) plants, plant products and other objects listed pursuant to Articles 41(1) and (2).0. (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout the text.)
Amendment 154 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 68 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Points (a) to (d) shall not apply, however, where the act adopted pursuant to Articles 27(1), 29(1) or 41(1) and (2)0 requires proof of compliance in the form of an official mark, as referred to in Article 91(1), or another official attestation, as referred to in Article 93(1). (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout the text.)
Amendment 178 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I a (new)
Annex I a (new)
Amendment 179 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I b (new)
Annex I b (new)
Amendment 180 #
2013/0141(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I c (new)
Annex I c (new)
Amendment 1 #
2012/2168(DEC)
Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Grants its President discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Parliament budget for the financial year 2011; / Postpones its decision on granting its President discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Parliament budget for the financial year 2011;
Amendment 40 #
2012/2168(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the fact that the audit of the Court of Auditors found that the Parliament's supervisory and control systems of administrative expenditure as a whole, that are required by the Financial Regulation, were effective and that, as regards the payments of administrative expenditure in 2011, the transactions affected by one or more errors are not material to administrative expenditure as a whole were not affected by material errors;
Amendment 63 #
2012/2168(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
Paragraph 42
42. Welcomes the fact that the internalisation of the security services willis expected to reduce costs in Brussels and Strasbourg by EUR 16 000 000 in the period up to 2015 and by EUR 6 000 000 for each year thereafter; asks the administration for a yearly report with detailed information on the development of the costs of the security service, including the accrued costs for pensions of staff employed for these services, and the measures taken to ensure the scope and quality of the service;
Amendment 2 #
2012/2119(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Special Report No 7/2012 indicates that although demand for grubbing-up exceeded 350 000 ha its impact was limited by the fixed target of 175 000 ha and at the end only 160 550 ha were grubbed up with the help of EU aid; the Court of Auditors estimates that the grubbing-up scheme finally reduced the vineyard inventory area by around 5 % corresponding to approximately 10,2 million hl of wine withdrawn or 6 % of the usable wine production; points out, however, that far more land – 300 000 ha in all – has been grubbed up since the reform, and that no such aid was provided in respect of around 140 000 ha of that land, a figure that does not appear in the Court of Auditors’ report.
Amendment 4 #
2012/2119(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Takes note of the Court of Auditors' concerns on the fact that the EU financed the grubbing-up measure in order to reduce the surplus of wine, while at the same timthe restructuring and conversion measure led in certain cases to some increases in vineyard yields; takes the view, however, that greater yields may make the wines more competitive, but strongly encourages the Commission to ensure that an appropriate policy mix is availablstrategy is in place to avoid future unbalances;
Amendment 649 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 1 – indent 1 a (new)
Article 47 – paragraph 1 – indent 1 a (new)
- major airports with more than 1% passenger air traffic within the EU.
Amendment 877 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 16/33
Annex I – Volume 16/33
add the following sea ports to the comprehensive network: – Marín y Ría de Pontevedra – Vilagarcía de Arousa – Gandía – Alcudía – Guía de Isora – Salinetas – Arinaga
Amendment 878 #
2011/0294(COD)
add the following multimodal platforms to the comprehensive network: – Pontevedra – Zalia – Torrelavega – Júndiz – Monzón – El Vallés – El Prat – El Gorguel – Ciudad Real – Albacete – San Roque – Mérida – Ponferrada/El Bierzo – Castellón – Alicante – Benavente – Zamora – Miranda de Ebro – Burgos – Palencia – Área Central – Aranda de Duero – Soria – Arévalo – Ávila – Segovia
Amendment 889 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 17/33
Annex I – Volume 17/33
add the airport of Castellón to the comprehensive network
Amendment 891 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 17/33
Annex I – Volume 17/33
add the following rail passenger transport sections to the core network: – Madrid – Toledo – Madrid – Alcázar – Albacete – Murcia – Almería – Málaga – Algeciras (along the coast) – Avilés – Oviedo – Bilbao – Santander – Oviedo – El Ferrol – A Coruña – Castejón – Logroño – Miranda – Mora – Alcázar – Linares – Moreda/Jaén/Córdoba – Ourense – Vigo (via Cercedo) – Ourense – Monforte – Lugo – A Coruña – Palencia – Santander – Segovia – Ávila – Sevilla – Cádiz – Sevilla – Huelva – Portuguese border – Valencia – Alicante (along the coast) – Motilla – Albacete – La Encina – Santiago – Vigo – Portuguese border – Granada – Motril – Antequera – Málaga – Madrid – Ávila – Salamanca – León – Monforte – Torralba – Soria – Castejón – Plasencia – León – Gijón
Amendment 892 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 17/33
Annex I – Volume 17/33
add the following rail passenger transport sections to the comprehensive network: – Almendricos – Águilas – Barcelona – Massanet – Barcelona – Puigcerdá – Játiva – Alcoy – Lleida – Manresa – Barcelona – Los Rosales – Zafra – Madrid – Burgos – Villalba – Segovia
Amendment 894 #
2011/0294(COD)
add the following high-quality road sections to the comprehensive network: – Valladolid – Aranda de Duero – Soria – Ourense – Santiago – Ourense – Guntín – Ponferrada – Ourense – Monforte – Chantada – Astorga – León – Burgos – Burgos – Logroño – Pamplona – Ávila – Salamanca – León – Valladolid – Segovia – Valladolid – Ávila – Maqueda – Toledo – Ocaña – Tarancón – Cuenca – Teruel – Alfajarín – Fraga -Catalayud – Daroca – Alcolea del Pinar – Monreal del Campo – Badajoz – Zafra – Córdoba – Baena – Granada – Huelva – Jabugo – Zafra – Estepa – Lucena – Baena – Jaén – Úbeda – Blanca – Avarán – La Font de la Figuera – Alicante – Alcoy – Játiva – Elche – Cartagena – Vera – Figueras – Puigcerdá – Ávila – Villacastín – San Rafael – Segovia
Amendment 991 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 17/33 (new)
Annex I – Volume 17/33 (new)
to add the following airports to the core network: - Alicante - Gran Canaria - Málaga - Tenerife Sur - Santiago de Compostela
Amendment 1886 #
2011/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 121 – title
Article 121 – title
Implementation of international and other agreements
Amendment 18 #
2011/0270(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) Taking into account the limited funds available to the programme and the pre- allocation of these funds to the various axes, funding priority should be given to the development of structures with a clear multiplier effect which will benefit further projects and initiatives, thereby adding more value to the investment. Appropriate measures should also be put in place to avoid any possibility of overlap and/or double-financing with other funds or programmes, in particular the European Social Fund.
Amendment 19 #
2011/0270(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) EURES’ scope should be widened to develop and support targeted mobility schemes at Union level with a view to filling vacancies where labour market shortcomings have been identified. In accordance with Article 47 of the Treaty, the scheme should facilitate mobility among young workers. To enable it to achieve its objectives, it would be advisable for the three axes that make up the programme to retain a degree of financial independence.
Amendment 20 #
2011/0270(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission may, without exceeding 3% except in duly justified cases, make use of the appropriations referred to in paragraph 1, to finance technical and/or administrative assistance, in particular relating to auditing, outsourcing of translation, meetings of experts, and information and communication activities for the mutual benefit of the Commission and the beneficiaries.
Amendment 21 #
2011/0270(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall take appropriate preventive measures ensuringand shall carry out effective checks to ensure that, when actions financed under this Regulation are implemented, the financial interests of the Union are protected against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities, by effective checks and, if irregularities are detected, by the recovery of amounts wrongly paid and, where appropriate, by effective, proportional and deterrent penalties, in accordance with Article 325 of the Treaty, Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests and the Financial Regulation.
Amendment 22 #
2011/0270(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. In accordance with Article 325 of the Treaty, Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests and the Financial Regulation, if irregularities are detected, the amounts wrongly paid shall be recovered and the Commission may further decide on effective, proportional and deterrent penalties.
Amendment 13 #
2011/0269(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established by Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for the duration of the Financial Framework from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013 to enable the Union to show solidarity towards workers made redundant as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation and to provide support for their rapid reintegration into employment. This initial objective of the EGF remains validGiven the current state of uncertainty in which many Member States still find themselves, this initial objective of the EGF remains valid, as it enables, albeit on a modest scale, individually tailored services to be provided to workers who have lost their jobs as a result of collective redundancies caused by economic globalisation, which have a major impact at business, sectoral and regional levels.
Amendment 14 #
2011/0269(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on 'A budget for Europe 2020' recognises the role of the EGF as a flexible fund to support workers who lose their jobs and help them to find another job as rapidly as possible. The Union should continue to provide, for the duration of the Multiannual Financial Framework from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020, specific, one-off support to facilitate the re- integration into employment of redundant workers in areas, sectors, territories or labour markets suffering the shock of serious economic disruption. Given its purpose, which is to provide support in situations of urgency and unexpected circumstances, the EGF should remain outside the Multiannual Financial Framework, thereby equipping the Union with a rapid response mechanism to provide support during unemployment crises.
Amendment 15 #
2011/0269(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. At the initiative of the applicant Member State, a financial contribution may be made, not exceeding 5% of the total costs, for the preparatory, management, information and publicity, control and reporting activities.
Amendment 17 #
2011/0269(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall, on the basis of the assessment carried out in accordance with Article 8(3), particularly taking into account the number of targeted workers, the proposed actions and the estimated costs, evaluate and propose as quickly as possible the amount of a financial contribution, if any, that may be made within the limits of the resources available. The amount may not exceed 560% of the total of the estimated costs referred to in Article 8(2)(e) or 675% of these costs in the case of applications submitted by a Member State on the territory of which at least one region at NUTS II level is eligible under the "Convergence" objective of the Structural Funds. The Commission, in its assessment of such cases, will decide whether the 65% co- funding rate is justifiedthat is receiving assistance under the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism or through Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 of 18 February 2002 establishing a facility providing medium-term financial assistance for Member States' balances of payments1. _______________ 1 OJ L 53, 23.2.2002, p. 1.