4 Amendments of Petri SARVAMAA related to 2012/2190(DEC)
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Acknowledges from the Court of Auditors the need to improve the transparency of staff selection procedures; acknowledgesnotes with concern that Selection Board members did not always complete their conflict of interest declarations or did not do so in a timely manner, and there was no evidence of any action taken to address the issues raised by these declarations; acknowledgeregrets that the documentation of the Selection Board's proceedings was not always adequate and that there is no evidence as to how the method for the short-listing of candidates was established and that the questions for the written tests or interviews were set before the examinations;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Notes with concern that according to the findings of the Court of Auditors, at the time of completion of the field work (October 2011), the Authority did not adequately manage conflict of interest situations; notes, however, that the Authority had already developed advanced policies for managing conflicts of interest;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 – introductory part
Paragraph 12 – introductory part
12. Notes that the Agency has taken a number of steps following the discharge authority's recommendations for 2010, the Court of Auditors' audit and the publication of Special Report 15/2012, in particular:
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Welcomes the Agency's commitment to undertake in the first half of 2013 a review of the implementation of its revised policy on the handling of conflicts of interests and that an ex ante and ex post check on the handling of conflicts of interests is currently being developed for implementation in the second quarter of 2013; calls on the Agency to keep the discharge authority informed on their respective outcomes;