8 Amendments of Petri SARVAMAA related to 2013/2256(DEC)
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas there has been a tenfoldsubstantial increase in the number of agencies over the last decade, from three in 2000 to 31 in 2012,
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission to continue its efforts and to report on its progress on an annual basis, inter alia, to report on the progress as regards completion of actions, the implementation of the completed actions and their outcomes and effectiveness and to provide a more detailed breakdown as regards when and how the decentralised agencies have contributed to those actions; requests that the Commission also include an analysis on how the change of reporting requirements contributes to the simplification and the reduction of the administrative burden;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 – indent 5 a (new)
Paragraph 18 – indent 5 a (new)
- weaknesses in verification of grant transactions;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 54
Paragraph 54
54. Considers that following the publication of the Commission’s guidelines, the agencies may need to redraft their policies for the prevention and management of conflicts of interest to bring them in line with the Commission’s guidelines and the Court of Auditor’s’ recommendations without hesitation, and calls on the agencies to report on the actions taken in the framework of the 2012 discharge follow-up;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 56
Paragraph 56
56. Reiterates its view that a high level of transparency is a key element to mitigate risks of conflicts of interest; calls, therefore, on the agencies that have not yet done so to make available on their websites, by the deadline of 1 December 2014, the list of their management boards’ members, management staff and external and in-house experts, together with their respective declarations of interests and curriculum vitae;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 59
Paragraph 59
59. Acknowledges from the Commission that in the framework of revision of the Staff Regulations, the Commission has proposed the revised wording of Article 110 of the Staff Regulations, which ensures theaims for simplification and flexibility as regards the implementing rules adopted to give effect to the Staff Regulations and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 62
Paragraph 62
62. Acknowledges from the Commission that the mechanism of the balancing contribution principle foreseen in the new FFR respects the funding keys of agencies with mixed funding, and over the past its application has ensured fairness and equal treatment for all contributors to the ESAs budget, and that abudget of the ESAs; questions the reasons why the specific Memorandum of Understanding between the ESAs and the Commission has been established in order to ensuraimed at ensuring the efficient establishment, implementation and monitoring of the budget of the ESAs has not yet been established;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 65
Paragraph 65
65. Reiterates the importance of putting in place policies ensuring that women and men are properly represented on the agencies’ governing bodies; calls on the agencies’ executive directors, to ensure gender parequality among agency staff as a whole and among people in positions of responsibility, also calls on the management boards of the agencies and on the Commission to uphold the principles of gender equality and to take account of the strategy launched by the Commission in 2010 to achieve a better gender balance in positions of responsibility;