5 Amendments of Petri SARVAMAA related to 2017/2148(DEC)
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes from the Court’s report that the level of committed appropriations carried forward to 2017 was high at EUR 2 800 000 (43 %) for Title III (operational expenditure), compared to EUR 2 100 000 (31 %) in 2015, mainly in relation to projects (studies and pilot schemes) going beyond the year end; takes note that the Foundation may consider introducing differentiated budget appropriations in order to better reflect the multiannual nature of operations and unavoidable delays between the signature of contracts, deliveries and payments;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that work-life balance should be part of the Foundation’s staff policy; stressnotes that the budget spent per staff on well-being activities amounts to EUR 80,21; observes that the average number of sick leave per staff is 6,5 days and that no member of staff was on full- year sick leave;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Recalls that staffing cuts have been implemented with great difficulty and reiterates its opposition toconcern towards any further cuts which would limit the agencies' ability to carry out their mandate;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 7
Subheading 7
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Strongly rRegrets the fact that Regulation (EEC) No 1365/75 does not explicitly require external evaluations of the Foundation’s activities; notes, however, that the Commission’s proposal for a new founding Rregulation includes the obligation of performing an evaluation every five years; also welcomes the fact that at the moment each of the four- year work programmes is, however, subject to an external evaluation;