4 Amendments of Petri SARVAMAA related to 2018/0166R(APP)
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Is deeply concerned by the cuts proposed by the Commission in the CAP and cohesion;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 37
Paragraph 37
37. FearNotes that the Commission’s proposal to design the new CAP on the basis of strategic plans to be drawn up by the Member States willmight oblige them to assume more responsibility for the cuts whileon agricultural policy and budgeting; this may increasinge the risk of creating more diversity and complexity in CAP financial management and making the legitimate controls more difficult;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 44
Paragraph 44
44. Notes that the overarching objective of conditionality in the EU is to foster integration and cohesion among Member States; believes that sound logical conditionality must involve setting incentives and sanctions in such a way that it contributes to the intended outcome and prevents the misuse of EU funds;
Amendment 129 #
Paragraph 15
15. Intends to secure a sufficient level of funding on the basis of the Commission proposal for “Migration and Border Management” (heading 4) and “Security and Defence” including civil protection and civilian crisis management (heading 5); reaffirms its longstanding position that additional political priorities should be coupled with additional financial means, in order not to undermine existing policies and programmes and their financing under the new MFF;