Activities of Rebecca TAYLOR related to 2013/2117(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
EU justice scoreboard (A7-0442/2013 - Tadeusz Zwiefka) (vote)
Amendments (5)
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to take into greater consideration and promote the work of the Council of Europe's Commission on the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), as it provides an excellent basis for the exchange of best practices, and duplication needs to be avoided;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that theany comparison of national justice systems must be based on objective criteria and on evidence which is objectively compiled, compared and analysed; points out the importance of assessing the functioning of the justice system as a whole, without separating it from the constitutional tradition that it stems from; stresses the importance of treating Member States impartially, thus ensuring equality of treatment between all Member States when assessing their justice systems;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that benchmarks must be set before information on national justice systems is gathered in order to develop a common understanding of methodology and indicators; stresses that these benchmarks must take into consideration the differences between national judicial systems, and in particular the differences between civil law and common law systems;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Member States to examine the results of the 2013 Justice Scoreboard and CEPEJ's 2012 evaluation report on European judicial systems closely and to determine whether any consequences need to be drawn therefrom for the organisation of their respective civil, commercial and administrative justice systems;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Notes, however, that many of the questions were not applicable or relevant to all judicial systems, which would explain why data is not complete for all Member States; calls on the Commission to take into greater consideration the differences between national judicial systems in future;