7 Amendments of Jozo RADOŠ related to 2016/2303(INI)
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the positive impact of the work of the Task Force for Greece and the Support Group for Cyprus on the implementation of the ESI Funds in those two countries, and in particular on absorption rates; stresses the need to form a working group, based on the experiences of the 2007-2013 programming period, to support other Member States which are experiencing difficulties in implementing Cohesion Policy;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Calls on the Commission to prepare measures and resources to set up technical assistance for the implementation of EU macro-regional strategies, having taken into account the varied experiences and rates of success of implementing such strategies, as well as the fact that the strategies' participants include non-Member States and countries with limited funds and insufficient human resources; considers that this would be more effective in helping to prepare major projects at the macro-regional level that could receive funding under Cohesion Policy;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Calls on the Commission to establish technical assistance, namely Member States Working Groups, in order to prevent delays in developing the bodies and operational programmes that will be needed under Cohesion Policy in the Member States after 2020;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Highlights that the 2019 performance review will shed some light on the results of the use of technical assistance in the 2014-2020 programming period but these will come too late for the discussions on the post 2020-period; stresses the need, therefore, to include information in the debate on technical assistance after 2020 concerning the quality of the implementation of Cohesion Policy in the Member States;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Highlights that the largest part of technical assistance resources is spent on staff costs which are necessary for the implementation of ESI Funds; considerstresses, however, that this funding should not under any circumstances act as a substitute for national financing in this area, and that there should be a gradual strategic shift towards activities which generate greater added value for cohesion policy in general, such as communication or experience- sharing;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses that technical assistance in the future should be increasingly focused on the beneficiary/project level, regardless of whether it relates to the public economic sector or to the civil society sector;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Asks the Commission to consider all these elements in the context of the preparation of the legislative proposals for post-2020 cohesion policy, i.e. experience from the current and previous programming period;