4 Amendments of Martina ANDERSON related to 2018/2066(INI)
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Takes noteRegrets that to date no appropriate impact assessment has been conducted in order to assess in depth the risks posed by transfers of personal data to the Arab Republic of Egypt as regards individuals’ rights to privacy and data protection, but also for other fundamental rights and freedoms protected by the Charter; askscalls on the Commission to carry out an appropriate impact assessment before beginning negotiations, so as to define the necessary safeguards to be integrated in the agreement;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Requests that tThe agreement must clearly provide that any further processing should always require prior and written authorisation by Europol; stresses that these authorisations should be documented by Europol and made available to the EDPS at its request; calls for the agreement also to contain a provision obliging the competent authorities of the Arab Republic of Egypt to respect these restrictions and specify how compliance with these restrictions would be enforced;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Insists that the agreement contain a clear and precise provision setting out the data retention period of personal data that have been transferred and requiring the automatic erasure of the personal data transferred at the end of the data retention period; requests that procedural measures be set out in the agreement to ensure compliance; insists that, in exceptional cases, where there are duly justified reasons to store the data for an extended period, past the expiry of the data retention period, these reasons and the accompanying documentation be communicated to Europol and the EDPS;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Points out that the transfer of personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade-union membership, genetic data or data concerning a person’s health and sex life is extremely sensitive and gives rise to profound concerns given the different legal framework, societal characteristics and cultural background of the Arab Republic of Egypt compared with the European Union; highlights the fact that criminal acts are defined differently in the Union from in the Arab Republic of Egypt; is of the opinion that such a transfer of data should therefore only take place in very exceptional cases and with clear safeguards for the data subject and persons linked to the data subject; Considers it necessary to impose safeguards on the Arab Republic of Egypt as regards respect for freedom of expression, freedom of religion, human dignity and so forth;not take place