BETA

42 Amendments of Nils TORVALDS related to 2011/0359(COD)

Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation
Title 0
Proposal for a REGULATIONDIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities (Text with EEA relevance) 'this amendment applies throughout the text'
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24 a (new)
(24a) When it concerns the renewal of an audit engagement the audit committee shall base its recommendation periodically on a comprehensive assessment of the audit quality of the statutory auditor or audit firm. The comprehensive assessment shall include the consideration of professional competencies of the statutory auditor or audit firm (i.e. industry knowledge, infrastructure, technical know-how, IT competence), which may vary according to the size and complexity of the audited entity. The audit committee shall also consider adherence to relevant rules and regulations as well as to professional standards. The competent authority shall issue guidelines on the criteria of professional competencies to facilitate the selection procedure.
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) In order to address the familiarity threat and therefore reinforce the independence of auditors and audit firms, it is important to establish a maximum duration of the audit engagement of a statutory auditor or audit firm in a particular audited entity. An appropriate gradual rotation mechanism should also be established with regard to the most senior personnel involved in the statutory audit, including the key audit partners carrying out the statutory audit on behalf of the audit firm. It is also important to provide for an appropriate period within which such statutory auditor or audit firm may not carry out thFurthermore, a comprehensive, transparent and independent evaluation of audit quality should be regularly and appropriately documented. This comprehensive assessment should form the basis for the auditor selection by the general assembly, which follows a tender procedure at least every 14 years. Furthermore, an appropriate gradual rotation mechanism for financial companies defined in this Regulation should be estatutory audit of the same entity. In order to ensure a smooth transition, the former auditor should transfer a handover file with relevant information to the incoming auditorblished with regard to the most senior personnel involved in the statutory audit, including the key audit partners carrying out the statutory audit on behalf of the audit firm.
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
A statutory auditor or audit firm shall take all necessary steps to ensure that the carrying outindependence of athe statutory auditor ofr a public-interest entity is not affected by any existing or potential conflict of interest or businessudit firm carrying out the statutory audit is not compromised by financial, personal, business, employment or other relationships involving the statutory auditor or, the audit firm carrying out the statutory audit and, where appropriate, its, its affiliate firms and network, managers, auditors, employees, any other natural persons whose services are placed at the disposal or under the control of the statutory auditor or audit firm, or any person directly or indirectly linked tod any natural person in a position to influence the outcome of the statutory auditor or audit firm by control.
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. When the statutory auditor or audit firm provides to the audited entity related financial audit services, as referred to in Article 10(2), the fees for such services shall be limited to no more than 10 % of the fees paid by the audited entity for the statutory audit.deleted
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
A statutory auditor or an audit firm carrying out statutory audit of public- interest entities mashall not directly or indirectly provide to the audited entity, to its parent undertaking and to its controlled undertakings statutory any non-audit services and related financial audit servicesthat are prohibited by this Article.
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Where the statutory auditor belongs to a network, ano member of such network mayshall provide to the audited entity, to its parent undertaking and to its controlled undertakings within the Union statutoryany non- audit services or related financial audit servicesthat are prohibited by this Article.
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. For the purposes of this Article, related financial audit services shall mean: (a) the audit or review of interim financial statements; (b) providing assurance on corporate governance statements; (c) providing assurance on corporate social responsibility matters; (d) providing assurance on or attestation of regulatory reporting to regulators of financial institutions beyond the scope of the statutory audit and designed to assist regulators in fulfilling their role, such as on capital requirements or specific solvency rations determining how likely an undertaking will be to continue meeting its debt obligations; (e) providing certification on compliance with tax requirements where such attestation is required by national law; (f) any other statutory duty related to audit work imposed by Union legislation to the statutory auditor or audit firm.deleted
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part
For the purposes of this Article, prohibited non-audit services shall mean:
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point i a (new)
(ia) Providing tax services involving acting as an advocate before a public tribunal or court in the resolution of a tax matter and the amounts involved are material to the financial statements;
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point i b (new)
(ib) Preparing tax calculations of current and deferred tax liabilities or assets for the purpose of preparing accounting entries that are material to the financial statements;
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point i c (new)
(ic) Providing tax or corporate finance advice when the effectiveness of the advice depends upon a particular accounting treatment or presentation in the financial statements and when there is reasonable doubt about the appropriateness of the accounting treatment and the outcome or consequences of the advice would materially affect such financial statements;
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point ii
(ii) bookkeeping and preparing, payroll services and the preparation of accounting records and financial statements;
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point iii
(iii) designing andor implementing internal control or, risk management procedureor financial information technology systems related to the preparation and/or control of financingal information included in the financial statements and advice on riskthat;
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point iii – point a (new)
a) form a significant part of the internal control over financial reporting of the audited entity, or
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point iii – point b (new)
b) generate information that is significant to the accounting records of financial statements that are subject to the statutory audit;
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point iv
(iv) valuation services, providing fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind repor or litigation support services, where the valuation would have a material effect separately or in the aggregate on the financial statements;
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point v
(v) actuarial and legal services, including the resolution of litigationlegal services consisting of acting as an advocate in the resolution of disputes and litigation where the advocacy services can only be provided by a person admitted to practice law before the courts of a Member State and the amounts involved are material to the financial statements;
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point vi
(vi) designing and implementing financial information technology systems for public-interest entities as referred to in Article 2(13)(b) to (j) of Directive 2006/43/EC;deleted
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point viii
(viii) bproker or dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services.viding corporate finance services involving promoting, dealing in, or underwriting shares of the audited entity;
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point viii a (new)
(viiia) human resources services with respect to senior management in a position to exert significant influences over the preparation of the accounting records or financial statement subject to the statutory audit, where such services involve.
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point b
(b) services which may entail conflict of interest: (i) human resources services, including recruiting senior management; (ii) providing comfort letters for investors in the context of the issuance of an undertaking's securities; (iii) designing and implementing financial information technology systems for public-interest entities as referred to in Article 2(13)(a) of Directive 2006/43/EC; (iv) due diligence services to the vendor or the buy side on potential mergers and acquisitions and providing assurance on the audited entity to other parties at a financial or corporate transaction.deleted
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
By derogation from the first and second subparagraphs, the services mentioned in point (b)(iii) and (iv) may be provided by the statutory auditor or the audit firm, subject to prior approval by the competent authority referred to in Article 35(1).deleted
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 5
By derogation from the first and second subparagraphs, the services mentioned in point (b)(i) and (ii) may be provided by the statutory auditor or the audit firm, subject to prior approval by the audit committee as referred to in Article 31 of this Regulation.deleted
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new)
(3a) A statutory auditor or audit firm may provide non-audit services other than prohibited non-audit services where: a. the provision of those services has been approved by the audit committee, in the light of its obligation under Article 31 to satisfy itself as to the auditor's likely ability to mitigate any threats to its independence in its conduct as statutory auditor; and b. the competent authority has not exercised its power under Article 38 – paragraph 6 a (new), to prohibit the provision of those services.
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
Being involved in the decision-taking of the audited entity and the provision of the services referred to in points (ii) and (iii) of paragraph 3(a)non- audit services shall be considered as affecting such independence in all cases.
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
The provision of the services referred to in points (i) and (iv) to (viii) of paragraph 3(a) shall be presumed to affect such independence.deleted
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. Where an audit firm generates more than one third of its annual audit revenues from large public-interest entities and belongs to a network whose members have combined annual audit revenues which exceed EUR 1 500 million within the European Union, it shall comply with the following conditions: (a) it shall not directly or indirectly provide to any public interest entity non- audit services; (b) it shall not belong to a network which provides non-audit services within the Union; (c) any entity which provides the services listed in paragraph 3 shall not directly or indirectly hold more than 5 % of the capital or of the voting rights in the audit firm; (d) the entities which provide the services listed in paragraph 3shall not directly or indirectly hold together more than 10 % of the capital or of the voting rights in the audit firm; (e) such audit firm shall not directly or indirectly hold more than 5 % of the capital or of the voting rights in any entity which provides the services listed in paragraph 3.deleted
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 68 for the purpose of adapting the list of related financial audit services referred to in paragraph 2 and the list of non-audit services referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article. When using such powers, the Commission shall take into account developments in auditing and the audit profession.
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Each public-interest entity shall have an audit committee. The audit committee shall be composed of non-executive members of the administrative body and/or members of the supervisory body of the audited entity and/or members appointed by the general meeting of shareholders of the audited entity or, for entities without shareholders, by an equivalent body.
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
When it concerns the renewal of an audit engagement in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 33(1), the audit committee shall, for the preparation of its recommendation, take into consideration any findings and conclusions base its recommendation on a comprehensive assessment of the audit quality onf the recommended statutory auditor or audit firm referred to in Article 40(6) and published by the competent authority pursuant to Article 44(d)after a period of three consecutive years. The competent authority referred to in Article 35 may adjust the timing in accordance with the national appointment period.
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
The comprehensive assessment shall be performed in a transparent and systematic approach, and shall include the consideration of professional competencies of the auditor or audit firm which are necessary to perform the statutory audit in compliance with relevant ethical requirements and international standards on auditing referred to in Article 20. It shall take into consideration any findings and conclusions on the recommended statutory auditor or audit firm referred to in Article 40(6) and published by the competent authority pursuant to Article 44(d). In its recommendation, the audit committee shall state that its recommendation is free from influence by a third party and that no contractual clause as referred to in paragraph 7 has been imposed upon it.
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point f
(f) the audited entity shall evaluate the proposals made by the statutory auditors or audit firms in accordance with the selection criteria predefined in the tender documents. The audited entity shall prepare a report on the conclusions of the selection procedure, which shall be validated by the audit committee. The audit committee shall perform a comprehensive assessment of the proposals made by the statutory auditors or audit firms in a transparent and systematic approach that shall include the consideration of professional competencies of the auditor or audit firm which are necessary to perform the statutory audit in compliance with relevant ethical requirements and international standards on auditing referred to in Article 20. The competent authority shall issue guidelines on the criteria of professional competencies. The audited entity and the audit committee shall take into consideration any inspection report on the applicant statutory auditor or audit firm referred to in Article 40(6) and published by the competent authority pursuant to Article 44(d);
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
If the proposal of the administrative or supervisory board departs from the recommendation of the audit committee, the proposal shall justify the reasons for not following the recommendation of the audit committee. It shall equally justify the reasons if, following a tender procedure referred to in paragraph 3, the renewal of an audit engagement is proposed.
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
In the case of a credit institution or insurance undertaking, tThe administrative or supervisory board shall submit its draft proposal to the competent authority referred to in Article 35(2). The competent authority referred to in Article 35(2) shall have the right to veto the choice proposed in the recommendation. Any such opposition shall be duly justified prior to the selection of the statutory auditor or audit firm by the relevant body or organ. The draft proposal to the competent authority referred to in Article 35(2) shall be accompanied by the results of the comprehensive assessment referred to in Article 32 (2) and (3).
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
The absence of a reply by the competent authority within the prescribed time-limit following submission of the audit committee's recommendation shall be considered as constituting an implied consent to the recommendation.deleted
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 478 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
2. By derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may decide that the responsibility for ensuring that all or part of the provisions of Title III of this Regulation are applied shall be entrusted to, as appropriate, the competent authorities referred to in: (a) Article 24(1) of Directive 2004/109/EC; (b) Article 24(4)(h) of Directive 2004/109/EC; (c) Article 40 of Directive 2006/48/EC; (d) Article 30 of Directive 2009/138/EC; (e) Article 20 of Directive 2007/64/EC; (f) Article 3(1) of Directive 2009/110/EC; (g) Article 48 of Directive 2004/39/EC; (h) Article 97 of Directive 2009/110/EC; (h) Article 44 of Directive 2011/61/EU.deleted
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 489 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43
[...]deleted
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 499 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 52
Article 52 Cooperation with regard to contingency planning Where the audit firms concerned by the requirement in Article 43 belong to networks of at least Union dimension, competent authorities shall cooperate within ESMA with a view to ensuring that the different national requirements take account of the network dimension. The competent authorities shall make available to ESMA and the other competent authorities the contingency plans received pursuant to Article 43(4). ESMA shall not formally approve or endorse the contingency plans, but may provide an opinion on them.deleted
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 502 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 3
3. This Article and Articles 62 to 66 areis without prejudice to provisions of national criminal law.
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 503 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 62
[...]deleted
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 505 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 63
Article 63 Effective application of sanctions 1. When determining the type of administrative sanctions and measures, competent authorities shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including: (a) the gravity and the duration of the violation; (b) the degree of responsibility of the responsible person; (c) the financial strength of the responsible person, as indicated by the total turnover of the responsible undertaking or the annual income of the responsible natural person; (d) the importance of the profits gained or losses avoided by the responsible person, insofar as they can be determined; (e) the level of cooperation of the responsible person with the competent authority, without prejudice to the need to ensure disgorgements of profits gained or losses avoided by that person; (f) previous violations by the responsible person. Additional factors may be taken into account by competent authorities, if such factors are specified in national law. 2. EBA, EIOPA and ESMA shall jointly issue guidelines addressed to competent authorities in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation No (EU) 1093/2010, Regulation No (EU) 1094/2010 and Regulation No (EU) 1095/2010 on types of administrative measures and sanctions and level of administrative pecuniary sanctions to be applied in individual cases within the national legal framework.deleted
2012/10/29
Committee: ECON