Activities of Anneleen VAN BOSSUYT related to 2016/0402(COD)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the legal and operational framework of the European services e-card introduced by Regulation....[ESC Regulation]....
Amendments (5)
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
This Directive is without prejudice to existing Union law on social issues, employment conditions (in particular posting of workers, workers' rights and the social pillar), health and safety and protection of the environment. It does not change or put into question existing safeguards in this respect.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
1. "home Member State" means the Member State to which a provider addressed the application for a European services e-cardwhere the service provider has its primary establishment/ is established, performs its substantial business activity and employs its administrative staff;
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The competent authorities of the host Member State may ask the competent authorities of the home Member State, in the event of justified doubts, to verify the authenticity and validity of documents required for the issuance of the European services e-card.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The host Member State shall take due account in that assessment of the requirements that the applicant already meets in its home Member States. For the purpose of that assessment and within the above-mentioned time-limit, the coordinating authority of the host Member State shall be allowed to request necessary clarifications or necessary additional information from the home Member State or the applicant which is not yet contained in the application. In that case, the time limit referred to in this paragraph is suspended untilfor a period not exceeding two weeks to allow for the supply of the requested necessary clarifications or necessary additional information is supplied. Consecutive requests for necessary clarifications or necessary additional information shall not result in suspensions of the time limit for a total of more than eight weeks. The procedure for requesting clarifications or additional information shall be laid down by way of the delegated acts referenced in paragraph 4. The procedure for requesting clarifications or additional information will be laid down by way of the delegated acts referenced in paragraph 4.
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Where the coordinating authority of the host Member State intends to reject the application in accordance with the conditions laid down in this Article, the coordinating authority of the host Member State shall inform the applicant of the home Member State, and state its reasons. The applicant shall have two weeks to submit its observations.