BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps

5 Amendments of Ondřej KOVAŘÍK related to 2019/2090(DEC)

Amendment 1 #
Gilles BOYER, Olivier CHASTEL, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ, Stéphanie YON-COURTIN, Ondřej KOVAŘÍK
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. AcknowledgUnderlines that, in the opinion of the Court, the transactions of the European Banking Authority (the ‘Authority’) underlying the annual accounts for the year 2018 are legal and regular in all material aspects;
2019/12/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 8 #
Gilles BOYER, Olivier CHASTEL, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ, Stéphanie YON-COURTIN, Ondřej KOVAŘÍK
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that, as the Authority’s workload is increasingly shifting fromconstantly evolving and includes both regulatory tasks toand the enforcingement and applying Union lawication of Union law; notes that in order to facilitate that evolution, budgetary and personnel resources have been reallocated internally;
2019/12/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 13 #
Gilles BOYER, Olivier CHASTEL, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ, Stéphanie YON-COURTIN, Ondřej KOVAŘÍK
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the Authority’s budget is financed 40 % from Union funds and 60 % through direct contributions from Member States’ supervisory authorities and that those mixed financing arrangements may pose a threat to the Authority’s independence and supervisory tasks;deleted
2019/12/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 15 #
Gilles BOYER, Olivier CHASTEL, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ, Stéphanie YON-COURTIN, Ondřej KOVAŘÍK
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Regrets that opportunities for 4. economies of scale and efficiency gains were not realised due to insufficient use ofthe decision not to have joint procurement procedures between the Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) when the Authority moved its seat from London to Paris; calls on the Authority to strengthen cooperation with ESMA concerning administrative support services and facility management services, which are not related to the core activities, where feasible;
2019/12/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 17 #
Gilles BOYER, Olivier CHASTEL, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ, Stéphanie YON-COURTIN, Ondřej KOVAŘÍK
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that 100 % of the budgetary surplus has been allocated to the Commission whereas Member States consider that 60 % thereof should be refunded to them; calls on the Commission to resolve that issue;deleted
2019/12/09
Committee: ECON
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation