23 Amendments of Ruža TOMAŠIĆ related to 2015/2092(INI)
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas technical measures are currently so complex, and diverse and disorganised, as to bdue to them being an accumulation of 30 years of fisheries legislation, they are frequently inconsistent or even contradictory, not to mention being difficult for those in the fisheries sector to comprehend and particularly difficult for enforcement agencies to monitor;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas regionalisation canmust ensure that rultechnical measures are adapted to the specific requirements of each fishery and each basin, ensuring flexibility and facilitating a rapid response to any emergencies arising; whereas regionalisation must make technical measures simpler and easier to understand, implement and enforce; the adoption of technical measures on a regional basis should follow the model agreed by the co- legislators as agreed under the reformed CFP
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital AA
Recital AA
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital AD
Recital AD
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital AE
Recital AE
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital AF
Recital AF
AF. whereas discard plans will play an essential role in view of the changes in fishing techniques and hence fishing mortality and individual spawning biomass, both quantifiable objectives under the multiannual plans, possibly brought about by modifications in minimum conservation sizes; whereas, modification of minimum sizes though delegated acttechnical measures will be used for reducing discards and implementation of the MSY approach; whereas the discard plans wcould mean changing the principal parameters of the multiannual plans from the outsideplay an essential role in supporting the discard ban;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital AG
Recital AG
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers it necessary to maintain the co-decision procedure for the adoption of rules common to all sea basins or for those are not likely to be amended within the foreseeable future and believes that co- decision is unnecessary for measures adopted at regional level or possibly subject to frequent changes;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Considers that in case of technical measures which regulate the maximum number of allowed catch days, only days with the registered catch should be taken into account.
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Considers that in accordance with the scientific definition and classification of fishing gear categories, it is necessary to split, for the Mediterranean basin, trawl nets and shore seines because the legislation which regulate trawl nets should not be identical with traditional coastal shore seines as they target mainly non endangered species.
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Maintains that, notwithstanding the discard ban, provisions regarding technical measures in areas such as catch composition must be sufficiently flexible to adapt in real time to progress in the fisheries and more selective fishing techniques;
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Believes that the conservation objective of the regulation on technical measures could be achieved more effectively through actions aimed at improving supply and demand management, foc7using to a greater extent with the assistance onf producer organisations, thereby optimizing the results being sought by EU provisions;
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Believes that the co-legislators must continue to seek agreement on multiannual plans on the basis of the case-law establishand believes that the multiannual plans should provide the framework for fisheries stock management and be based byon the EU Court of Justice;most recent and therefore accurate scientific and socio- economic evidence
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Believes it necessaryReaffirms the need to increase the involvement of stakeholders through the Advisory Councils in the formulation and implementation of multiannual plans and in all decisions concerning regionalisation;