9 Amendments of Kaja KALLAS related to 2015/2089(INI)
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas, more than 20 years after its official creation, the single market still has gapsframework is still fragmented, primarily because the Member States have not fully transposed or implemented Union legislation;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the deadlines involved in the subsidiarity mechanism are too short to ensure that parliaments always have time to consider in detail aspects of implementation or other practical mattersnational parliaments are not always able to consider in detail aspects of implementation, coherence with existing legislation or other practical matters in the time allocated through the subsidiarity mechanism; considers, therefore, that parliaments should be affordedplay a more actimve to respond; considers, as well, that a stronger ‘red card' procedure should be introduced, allowing proposals to be rejectrole in consultation processes and should if required on grounds of lack of conformity with subsidiarity, make use of the existing "yellow card" procedure;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that single market legislation should bserve to the benefit ofpromote competitiveness, innovation and, growth, and job creation, and views effective impact assessments as an important tool for informing policymakers on how best to design regulation to achieve these aims and their single market objectives;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Points out that the impact assessment accompanying a proposal should be seen as a ‘living document' that is kept up to date and that corresponds to the choices made byrevisited each time a legislative proposal is substantially amended at key stages of the co-legislators at the various stages of negotiations before the final political decision is takenive process; considers, however, that such procedures should not contribute to the lengthening of the policy-making process;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Underlines that small businesses do not often have the time and resources to participate in regular consultations; considers that the European Commission should find user-friendly and innovative ways to reach out to SMEs and start-ups;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Considers that, if the many benefits that a fully functioning single market can offer are to be realised, efforts should be madethe Commission and parliaments should work together to learn from the experiences of, and the practical challenges posed by, the implementation of specific regulations or requirements, to ensure that aims and objectives are not frustrated as a result of poor or inconsistent implementation across the Member States;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Considers, however, that analysis should be improved as regards to whether the legislative steps taken so far have contributed effectively to achieving an aim, and whether they still remain necessaryexisting legislation to ensure its compatibility with current policy goals, and contribution to the overall reduction of the regulatory burden; believes, in this context, that a rolling target for administrative and regulatory burden reduction can make a positive contribution to ensuring that aims are met in the most efficient way possible, and with the least possible cost to people and businesses;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Notes that the cumulative cost of regulation often represents a barriers for participants in the single market, particularly for SMEs; welcomes, therefore, the commitment by the Commission to examine this issue; underlines, however, that any such analysis should only address economic factors and should not be equated with a broader impact assessment, which includes assessments of other elementaim at removing barriers to market entry and at ensuring fair competition for all players;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Stresses that a single market that does not over-burden or frustrate production, innovation and commerce is a structure that will bring jobs and growth back to Europe that previously would have been located outside of it, where standards are lower;