28 Amendments of Dita CHARANZOVÁ related to 2015/2089(INI)
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Amendment 128 #
-1. Asks the Commission to take into account the recommendations contained in this resolution in its forthcoming internal market strategy;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that in order to be effective as tools, impact assessments should be prepared on the basis of strong evidence; believes that careful consideration of scientific advice should form part of the impact assessment process and, in particular, substantiate how or why policy choices have been mainclude all options which have significant impacts or are politically important; regrets in that respect that the country of origin marking foreseen by Article 7 of the Commission proposal for a Regulation on Consumer Product Safety was not among the options which were initially considered and then discarded in preparatory phases, which will assist the political processthe impact assessment, nor among the options analysed in depth;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Points out that the impact assessment accompanying a proposal should be seen as a ‘living document’ that is kept up to date and that corresponds to the choiceupplemented by impact assessments on substantial amendments madeopted by the co-legislators at the various stages of negotiations before the final political decisi; Recalls that Parliament has carefully assessed the potential impact on SMEs of some of its amendments to the two Public Procurement Directives; Urges therefore the Council - which has not done any impact assessment on its takenown amendments since 2007 - to become more involved;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Considers that the principle of subsidiarity is an essential element to be considered when assessing the impact of new legislations together with the principle of proportionality;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Recalls that the responsibility for subsidiarity extends beyond the Commission, the Council and Parliament, and includes a role for national parliaments;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph - 11 a (new)
Paragraph - 11 a (new)
-11a. Considers that the consultation phase should always include a 'Digital by default' section whereby the Commission would seek to deeply understand user needs and what it means for the design of the service;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Believes that full and proper implementation of single market legislation to be fundamental if the benefits of the single market are to be fully felt; expresses concern over the fact that targets for implementation are not always met; Calls in particular for a full and correct implementation of the Services directive; recalls the large degree of heterogeneity remaining between Member States and sectors, notably in the sector of legal services;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Regrets that despite the 0.5% target proposed by the Commission in the Single Market Act, Slovenia is still lagging behind; Stresses that it is not only the formal targets for transposition and implementation that are important, but also the practical implementation on the ground;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission to invest more efforts to improve, consolidate and publicise guidance on the regulations and tools in place that contribucontinue its effort and regularly update guidance on the regulations; in particular, calls for the quick update tof the monitoring of how Union law is being applied and that, as such, are vital to the proper functioning of the single marke2009 Guidance on the application of Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair commercial practices in order to make sure it fits to the digital age in close cooperation with the European Parliament;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Regrets that according to the Commission, France has both the slowest answering speed in days for requests entered in the IMI system and the lowest satisfaction rate of all EU countries;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Considers that the Internal Market Information System should continue to be expanded to other single market tools in order to become a central information hub; Highlight that it would allow to comply with the ‘once only’ principle, in line with the recent Commission initiatives;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 c (new)
Paragraph 19 c (new)
19c. Is concerned by the low level of awareness and understanding among Europeans of the services available such as Your Europe, Your Europe Advice, European Employment Service, CPC network, points of single contact, SOLVIT and Alternative and Online Dispute Resolution;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 d (new)
Paragraph 19 d (new)
19d. Considers that too few procedures can be completed online via the points of single contact and ask Member States to remedy this situation; Points out that Germany is lagging behind the other Member States in terms of performance of its points of single contact;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 e (new)
Paragraph 19 e (new)
19e. Asks the Commission to carry out in- depth reflection on their interaction and to explore the possibility to replace them by one single point of contact for consumers which would then direct the consumer to other tools as appropriate;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 f (new)
Paragraph 19 f (new)
19f. Considers that this reflection should ensure a better definition of these services in order to obtain a better separation of activities and then avoid overlapping;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 g (new)
Paragraph 19 g (new)
19g. Considers that the forthcoming revision of the Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) regulation should fully take into account the need to improve the information flow between the different single market tools;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Is very concerned by the fact that Slovenia ceased cooperation with the Commission services regarding Your Europe in all respects; Also underlines the need for Latvia and Greece to ensure permanent representation and regular attendance at the Editorial Board meetings;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls on the Commission to evaluate the performance of the Products Contact Points foreseen in the 2009 Mutual Recognition Regulation and the 2011 Construction Products Regulation;
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution
Title before Paragraph 23
Title before Paragraph 23
Enforcement and market surveillance
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph – 23 a (new)
Paragraph – 23 a (new)
- 23a. Underlines the need for a closer cooperation between the single market governance tools receiving consumer complaints about the breach of EU legislation by a trader and national enforcement bodies via formal procedures and improved data sharing;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Considers that market surveillance tools should be used in conjunction with single market tools to strengthen the enforcement of EU law;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 b (new)
Paragraph 25 b (new)
25b. In this regard, points out the national authorities do not always make correct use of the Information and Communication System on Market Surveillance (ICSMS) or fail to take necessary measures in a timely fashion; underlines in particular, the need to improve the passing on of cases between public authorities;
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 c (new)
Paragraph 25 c (new)
25c. Is concerned by the fact that, according a sample analysis conducted by the Commission in 2014, 60% of completed product investigations did not report on the country of origin, 32% of machinery product investigations were not accompanied by a risk classification and 5% percent of entries did not make reference to the EU regulation/directive at breach; Asks the Council and its Member States to give serious consideration to this issue and to inform the Parliament of the follow-up actions taken thereof;