14 Amendments of Dita CHARANZOVÁ related to 2016/2274(INI)
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
C a. Whereas the Commission Communication acknowledges the value of open standards for innovation, better software re-usability and data portability, but fails to provide a definition of an "open" standard;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
C b. Whereas the facilitation of open source software and hardware licencing solutions could provide a competitive advantage to European companies on the world stage by making digital goods and services more innovative and flexible ;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas ICT standards make it possible to develop interoperable solutions for complementary products and for the various parts of a particular product, which is particularly important for the development of the ‘internet of things’ (IoT), where the current standards fragmentation due to a large number of proprietary or semi-closed solutions is hindering the growth and take up;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that standards are a voluntary, market-driven tool providing technical requirements and guidance that can help implement European legislation and policies when they are developed in a transparent and inclusive way, but stresses that the political decisions regarding the level of protection of health, safety and environment should be left to the legislatorin particular by ensuring that goods and services are compliant in their design with the law such as with regard to health, safety and environment or data protection;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Urges the Commission to address the issues related to asymetries of information between SMEs and large companies, which hinder the ability of SMEs to enter licensing agreements on fair terms ;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Supports open standardisation processes as a driver of innovation, interconnectivity and deployment of technologies, but recalls that it is also important to ensure proper investment and expertise in, and the development of, cutting-edge technologiesbelieves that the openness of the standardisation process is not enough for a standard to be qualified as open ; Stresses that standard should be considered as open based on both the openness of the process and of the outcome of the standard, meaning that rights essential to implementation of the standard and for interfacing with other implementations, which have adopted that same standard, are licenced on a royalty free basis that is compatible with both open source and proprietary licenced solutions ; Calls on the Commission to implement that definition in its EU standardisation policy ;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Urges the Commission and the ESOs to produce a set of high-quality and interoperable standards to tackle the existing fragmentation which hinders the development of the digital technologies, which will contribute to the social, economic and environmental sustainability of ICT value chains and confirm commitment to the public interest of ensuring privacy and data protection;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Supports the Commission’s proposal forintention to explore initiatives such as a trusted IoT label and certification system, and recommends that the label provides cybersecurity ratings, and indicates the risks associated with the operation and use of an IoT device,to foster trust in the levels of privacy and end-to-end security of an IoT device, which should where relevant be developed on the basis of the requirements spelled out in the NIS Directive;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Acknowledges the concerns, in particular as regards the IoT, about how standard essential patents (SEPs) are related to standards and how restrictions with regard to patents might prevent these technologies to work in a seamless and interoperable way ; stresses that unfair and unreasonable IPR policy creates barriers in the single market that can hinder the take- up of the digital single market and of new technologies, in particular for IoT devices as they rely heavily on standardisation ;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Stresses that open standards are essential to the further development of open government data and smart cities policies as the release of data sets needs to based on open standards on data sharing, from the format of publication of the data, to the possibilities to reuse this data ; Highlights the role of public procurement in facilitating the adoption of open standards solutions ;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Invites the Commission to adopt an easy to use single point of access to standards that can provide assistance and information to the standards’ users on the available standards and their specifications, and that can help them find the standards that best match their needs, as well as guidance on the implementation of the standard;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Calls on the Commission to monitor international ICT standardisation developments and, if necessary, to financesupport the participation of experts in leading positionEuropean stakeholders within the international standardisation bodies, and in strategically important standardisation projects, in order to promote the European regulatory model and interests;