7 Amendments of Andrea BOCSKOR related to 2018/2004(INI)
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16
Citation 16
— having regard to the Joint Declaration of the Presidents of the European Council and the European Commission and of the Secretary-General of NATO of 8 July 2016 on, to the common sets of proposals for the implementation of the Joint Declaration endorsed by the EU and NATO Councils on 56 December 2016 and 65 December 20167, and to the progress reports on the implementation thereof of 14 June and 5 December 2017,
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
M. whereas the UN Group of Governmental Experts on Information Security (UNGGE) has concluded its last round of deliberation; whereas even though it failed to arrive at a consensus report this time, the 2015 and 2013 agreemenreports still apply, in that existing international law, in particular the Charter of the United Nations, is applicable and essential to maintaining peace and stability, and to promoting an open, secure, peaceful and accessible cyberspaceICT environment;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
N. whereas the recently launched framework for a joint EU diplomatic response to malicious cyber activities, the EU cyber diplomacy toolbox – aimed at developing the EU’s and Member States’ capacities in order to influence the behaviour of potential aggressors – foresees the use of proportionate measures within the CFSP, including, if necessary, restrictive measures;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
O. whereas different state actors – Russia, China and North Korea, among others –, non state actors and state-sponsored actors have been involved in malicious cyber activities in pursuit of political, economic or security objectives that include attacks on critical infrastructure, cyber-espionage, disinformation campaigns and limiting access to the internet (such as Wannacry, NontPetya); whereas such activities could constitute wrongful acts under international law and could lead to a joint EU response, such as using the EU cyber diplomacy toolbox;
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Strongly encourages the development of a collaborative platform, the planned Cyber Defence Education, Training and, Exercise Coordinand Evaluation Platform, within the ESDC with a view to facilitating the pooling and sharing of training and exercises; calls on the EDA to launch the Cyber Defence Training and Exercise Coordination Platform to support the Cyber Ranges Federation as soon as possible;
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Notes that there is substantial scope for a more ambitious and concrete cyber defence cooperation programme that goes beyond the conceptual level of cooperation in the context of specific operations; urges both organisations to present more ambitious proposals for the next review of the implementation of the Joint StatementDeclaration;
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Regrets that, after several months of negotiations, the UN Group of Governmental Experts failed to adopt a consensus report; recalls, however, that existing international law applies to cyberspace and that the 2013 and 2015 UNGGE reports still provide relevant guidelines, in particular as regards the prohibiexpectation forthat states should noto conduct or knowingly support cyber activities contrary to their obligations under international ruleslaw;