5 Amendments of Benedek JÁVOR related to 2016/2157(DEC)
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Reiterates its request for a joint assessment of the budgetary savings resulting from the Agreement to be included in its mid-term review or in the next follow-up report of the Agreement;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes with concern a consistent decrease in the payment execution rate in 2015 all over thin some budgetary items; takes note that 2015 was the starting year of the sixth term in office of the Committee, nevertheless is of the opinion that the Committee should not allow it to impact in the budgetary management; calls on the Committee to improve its performance and better prepare for the starting year of the seventh term in office of the Committee;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Considers it fundamental that the Committee immediately follows-up on the two EU’s Civil Service Tribunal’s rulings6 and the European Anti-Fraud Office’s (“OLAF”) case report7 , the Commission’s PMO department’s report8 and Parliament’s resolutions9 and brings the whistle-blower case of the former internal auditor of the Committee to a just, honourable and equitable settlement before the end of 2017immediately after the final Court ruling in this case will be delivered; after years of the Committee’s failure to close this case and come to a just settlement considers the successful closure of the case in 2017 as one of the deciding criteria to grant the Committee the 2016next discharges; _________________ 6 Judgments of the Civil Service Tribunal of 7 May 2013, case F-86/11 (ECLI:EU:F:2011:189) and of 18 November 2014, case F-156/12 (ECLI:EU:F:2014:247). 7 OLAF Final Case Report dated 8 October 2003. 8 The Commission PMO department’s report of 8 May 2008. 9 Parliament’s 6 different resolutions of 29 January 2004 (OJ L 57, 25.2.2004, p. 8), 21 April 2004 (OJ L 330, 4.11.2004, p. 153), 12 April 2005 (OJ L 196, 27.7.2005, p. 54), 27 April 2006 (OJ L 340, 6.12.206, p. 44), 29 April 2015 (OJ L 255, 30.9.2015, p. 132) and 28 April 2016 (OJ L 246, 14.9.2016, p. 152) in support of the Committee’s Internal Auditor’s case..
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Considers it fundamental that the Committee work together with the EESC to immediately follow-up on the ruling of the Union's Civil Service Tribunal in a harassment case involving officials from both institutions[1], that it reports to the Parliament on the progress and that it review its procedures for handling future allegations of harassment to ensure that they are in line with the jurisprudence of the Civil Service Tribunal. [1] Affaire F-124/10: Vassilliki Labiri contre Comité économique et social européen (CESE).