Activities of Cláudia MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR related to 2022/2003(INI)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on co-management of fisheries in the EU and the contribution of the fisheries sector for the implementation of management measures
Amendments (14)
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
— having regard to Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU);
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
E a. Considering the maritime dimension that the Outermost Regions attribute to the EU, with vast exclusive economic zones (EEZs), which represent more than half of the EU's EEZ1a; _________________ 1ahttps://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/PT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:5202 2DC0198&from=PT (pág.16)
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Recital E b (new)
E b. Whereas almost 80% of the EU's biodiversity currently resides in its outermost regions and overseas countries and territories2a; _________________ 2a https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc ument/TA-9-2021-0277_PT.pdf
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E c (new)
Recital E c (new)
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas, in all the cases of co- management mentioned above, the change in the role of fishers – from passive subjects who comply with the rules to protagonists in fisheries management – is fundamental to the success of the initiatives adopted, as they learn to understand the importancewill contribute to a better understanding of the rulesm, to defend them and monitor compliance with them, and to manage their fishing methods in an ecosystem-based approach, understanding the importance of their fisheries in the ecosystems;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas scientific work, that produces regular and up-to-date data, is needed to advise on the measures to be taken to ensure responsible use of common resources, as laid down in Articles 26 and 27 of the Common Fisheries Policy in Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises the fact that co- management contributes to the elimination of IUU fishing practices, as industry and administrations are involved and it is easier to identify and understand malpractices and to combat them;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Defends the importance of the Outermost Regions both in the fight against illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing and in the fight against ocean pollution due to their dispersion and privileged location in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, being necessary to provide them with greater capacity for enforcement and monitoring programs;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Points out that if a European regulatory framework for shared fisheries management is to be introduced, it should promote better management of fishing quotas between the Outermost Regions and their Member States, taking into account the specificities of each of these regions;
Amendment 80 #
10 b. Underlines, taking into account the importance of the fisheries sector in the Outermost Regions, the importance of urging the Member States to provide timely information on the evolution of quota consumption so that these regions can keep the sector informed and better manage their fleet;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 c (new)
Paragraph 10 c (new)
10 c. Urges the European Commission to take into account the Member States with Outermost Regions in the definition of the annual admissible totals, in particular in species that are of crucial importance for each of these regions;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to promote, within the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF), a commitment to co- management models for fisheries with adequate funding;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Notes that global fisheries management is mainly based on a top- down state-centred approach, focused on industrial or large-scale fisheries, economic efficiencylarge and shared fish stocks, socio economic factors, environmental sustainability, and is guided by scientific research in marine biology; considers that this approach would not always be valid for small- scale fisheries, particularly for those stocks not subject to TAC, that need the involvement of the fishing community in fisheries management tools, and that it has not been the best approach with regard to semi- industrial and industrial fisheries globally;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. “Highlights the importance of the work of the Advisory Councils in the fisheries management decision-making process; Calls on the Commission and Member States to increase participation in ACs meetings and better communicate on the value of their advice; Considers that ACs role must be further developed to foster bottom-up approach.”