6 Amendments of António MARINHO E PINTO related to 2014/2080(DEC)
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Recommends that the institution should be reorganised in such a way as to make a clearer separation between legal and administrative functions, thus bringing the setup more closely into line with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, so that judges no longer run the risk of having to rule on appeals against acts in which their authorities have been directly involved;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Recalls that in its response to the discharge resolution 2012 the Court of Justice indicates that holding more hearings and judgements would not increase productivity significantly; Points out that on the other hand the Court asked to increase the number of judges; urges the Court of Justice to requested an external peer review in order to be provided with external instruments to identify possible solutions to the problems raised by the Court;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Regrets the insufficient information received during the discharge procedure regarding the list of external activities pursued by the Judges; asks the European Court of Justice to publish on its homepage a register which includes detailed information on outside activities of each judge;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Asks the Court to consider a unification of the Registries of the Court into one Registry in order to ensure a better coordination of procedural actions between the Courts;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 d (new)
Paragraph 9 d (new)
9d. Asks the Court to verify on a case by case basis the necessity of translation if there is a limited relevance for EU- citizens;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Court of Justice to consider a reduction inreduce the number of official cars at the disposal of the Members and staff and to report to the European Parliament on the savings made; is of the opinion that a revision of post assignments for drivers will thus be required; points out that the cost of the extended private services provided by drivers is borne by European taxpayers;