24 Amendments of António MARINHO E PINTO related to 2018/0050(COD)
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4a (new)
Recital 4a (new)
(4a) In accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, Article 2(2), the maximum sustainable yield exploitation rate shall be achieved by 2015 where possible and, on a progressive, incremental basis at the latest by 2020 for all stocks.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7a (new)
Recital 7a (new)
(7a) Pursuant to the principles of the Common Fisheries Policy and to guarantee a level playing field and fair competition between sea basins, there should be a uniform framework in all multi-annual plans and no sea basin specific derogations regarding the objectives expressed in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) The objective of the plan provided for in this Regulation should be to contribute to the achievementachieve the objectives of the CFP, and in particular, reachstoring and maintaining MSY for the targetfish stocks above levels of biomass capable of producing MSY for all stocks, implementing the landing obligation for demersal stocks subject to minimum conservation reference size, and promoting a fair standard of living for those who depend on fishing activities, bearing in mind coastal fisheries and socio-economic aspects. It should also implement the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management in order to minimisby reducing, and when possible eliminating, the negative impaeffects of fishing activities oin the marine ecosystem. It should be coherent with the Union’s environmental legislation, in particular the objective of achieving good environmental status by 2020 (in accordance withnvironment. That plan should also contribute to the achievement of good environmental status, as laid down in Directive 2008/56/EC28 ) and the objectives of Directive 2009/147/EC29 and Council Directive 92/43/EEC30 . _________________ 28 Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) (OJ L 164, 25.6.2008, p. 19) 29 Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7). 30o the achievement of favourable conservation status for habitats and species as required by Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 29 and the Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7)30 respectively.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) Where scientific advice shows that the fishing effort regime is not sufficient to meet the objectives or targets of the plan provided for in this Regulation, management measures based on total allowable catchecatch limits should be introduced in order to complement the effort regime.
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. This Regulation shall apply to by- catch stocks caught in the western Mediterranean Sea when fishing for the stocks referred to in paragraph 1 and shall ensure that exploitation of all living marine biological resources restores and maintains populations of harvested species above levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield, in line with article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013. It shall also apply to any other demersal stocks caught in the western Mediterranean Sea and for which sufficient data are not available.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) ‘FMSY point value’' means the value of the estimated fishing mortality that with a given fishing pattern and current environmental conditions gives the long- term maximum yield;
Amendment 154 #
‘Best available scientific advice’ refers to publicly available scientific advice that is supported by the most up-to-date scientific data and methods and has either been issued or reviewed by an independent scientific body that is recognised at Union or international level.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The plan shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the common fisheries policy, as listed in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, in particular by applying the precautionary approach to fisheries management, and shall aim to ensure that exploitation of living marine biological resources restores and maintains populations of harvested species above levels which can produce MSY.
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The plan shall contribute to the elimination of discards by avoiding and reducing unwanted catches as far as possible, and to the full implementation of the landing obligation established in Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 for the species which are subject to minimum conservation reference sizes and to which this Regulation applies.
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. The plan shall implement the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management in order to ensure that negative impacts of fishing activities on the marine ecosystem are minimised. It shall be coherent with Union environmental legislation, in particular with the objective of achieving good environmental status by 2020 as set out in Article 1(1) of Directive 2008/56/EC and the objectives set out in Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 2009/147/EC and Articles 6 and 12 of Council Directive 92/43/EEC. The maximum sustainable yield exploitation rates shall be achieved as soon as possible and on a progressive, incremental basis by 2020 at the latest for allstocks to wich this Regulation applies, and maintained thereafter, as set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. The plan shall implement the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management in order to ensure that negative impacts of fishing activities on the marine ecosystem are minimised. In particular, the plan should contribute to reduce bycatch of sensitive species, as well as the impact on sensitive habitats. It shall be coherent with Union environmental legislation, in particular with the objective of achieving good environmental status by 2020 as set out in Article 1(1) of Directive 2008/56/EC and the objectives set out in Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 2009/147/EC and Articles 6 and 12 of Council Directive 92/43/EEC.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) ensure that, to the extent that fisheries can contribute to their fulfilment, the conditions described in the qualitative descriptor 3s contained in Annex I to Directive 2008/56/EC are fulfilled; and
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5
Article 3 – paragraph 5
5. Measures in the plan shall be taken on the basis of the best available scientific advice. Where there is insufficient data, at least a comparable degree of conservation of the relevant stocks shall be pursued.
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. The target fishing mortality in line with the ranges of FMSY defined in Article 2 shall be achieved as soon as possible, and on a progressive, incremental basis by 2020 for the stocks concernedall harvested stocks, and shall be maintained thereafter within the ranges of FMSY.
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) if, on the basis of the best available scientific advice or evidence, it is necessary for the achievement of the objectives laid down in Article 3 in mixed fisheries;
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) if, on the basis of the best available scientific advice or evidence, it is necessary to avoid serious harm to a stock due to intra- or inter-species stock dynamics; or
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. A fishing effort regime shall apply to all vessels fishing with trawls in the areas and vessels length categories defined in Annex I.
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Each year, in accordance with the best available scientific advice, the Council shall set a maximum allowable fishing effort for each effort group by Member State.
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. For the first year of implementation of the plan, the maximum allowable fishing effort shall be substantially reduced from the baseline provided for in paragraph 4, in accordance with the scientific advice and on the basis of stock status in each area where stocks are predominantly caught.
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. For the first year of implementation of the plan, the maximum allowable fishing effort shall be substantially reduced from the baseline provided for in paragraph 4, in accordance with the best available scientific advice.
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1a (new)
1a. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the use of trawls shall be prohibited within 20 nautical miles of the coast or within the 100m isobath where that depth is reached at a shorter distance from the coast.
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12a (new)
Article 12a (new)
Article 12a Managementof incidental catches of protected species 1. National scientific research programmes shall be established to identify the overlap of sensitive species with fishing gear and fishing effort and determine technical solutions for fishing gears. 2. A range of scientifically tested technical solutions shall be applied in the western Mediterranean Sea to protect sensitive species. This shall include implementing scaring devices on-board vessels, setting the nets at night, shielding hooks until a predetermined depth, and increasing the sink rate of the hooks for all longline vessels in order to protect seabirds. 3. Spatial measures shall be applied in the western Mediterranean Sea where scientific research has identified areas where sensitive species are known to be incidentally caught until these can be replaced with other technical measures. 4.Where Member States do not implement management measures to protect species and habitats in the western Mediterranean Sea from the negative impact of fishing operations, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts as provided in article 13 of this Regulation.
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point ga (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point ga (new)
(ga) establishing fish stock recovery areas, pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 to protect spawning and nursery areas for demersal stocks.