BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps

17 Amendments of Marie-Christine BOUTONNET related to 2013/0256(COD)

Amendment 49 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Since the European Public Prosecutor's Office should be established from Eurojust, this Regulation includes the provisions necessary to regulate the relations between Eurojust and the European Public Prosecutor's Office.deleted
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 53 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) Whilst the European Public Prosecutor's Office should have exclusive competence to investigate and prosecute crimes affecting the Union's financial interests, Eurojust should be able to support national authorities when they are investigating and proscrimes affecuting these forms of crime in accordance with the Regulation establishing the European Public Prosecut financial interests of the Union and prosecuting these for'ms Officof crime.
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 72 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Eurojust should be able to exchange personal data with other Union bodies to the extent necessary for the accomplishment of its tasks.deleted
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 74 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)16 should apply to Eurojust. __________________ 16deleted OJ L 136, 31.5.1999, p. 1.
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 78 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. Eurojust shall support and strengthen coordination and cooperation between national investigating and prosecuting authorities in relation to serious crime affecting two or more Member States, or requiring a prosecution on common bases, on the basis of operations conducted and information supplied by the Member States' authorities and by Europol.
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 81 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. Eurojust shall exercise its tasks at the request of the competent authorities of the Member States or on its own initiative.
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 104 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii
(ii) when the case involves investigations or prosecutions which have proven repercussions at Union level or which might affect Member States other than those directly concerned;
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 117 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
3. The European Public Prosecutor shall receive the agendas of all College meetings and shall be entitled to participate in such meetings, without the right to vote, whenever issues are discussed which he or she considers to be of relevance for the functioning of the European Public Prosecutor's Office.deleted
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 123 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) ensure adequate follow-up to the findings and recommendations stemming from the internal or external audit reports, evaluations and investigations, including those of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) and the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF);
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 127 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 7
7. The European Public Prosecutor shall receive the agendas of all Executive Board meetings and shall be free to participate in such meetings, without the right to vote, whenever issues are discussed which he or she considers to be of relevance for the functioning of the European Public Prosecutor's Office.deleted
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 131 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 8
8. The European Public Prosecutor may address written opinions to the Executive Board, to which the Executive Board shall respond in writing without undue delay.deleted
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 141 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – point f
(f) preparing an action plan following- up on the conclusions of the internal or external audit reports, evaluations and investigations, including those of the European Data Protection Supervisor and OLAF and reporting on progress twice a year to the Executive Board, the Commission and the European Data Protection Supervisor;
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 148 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 7
7. The Case Management System and its temporary work files shall be made available for use by the European Public Prosecutor's Office.deleted
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 151 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 8
8. The provisions on access to the Case Management System and the temporary work files shall apply mutatis mutandis to the European Public Prosecutor's Office. However, the information entered into the Case Management System, temporary work files and the index by the European Public Prosecutor's Office shall not be available for access at the national level.deleted
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 162 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41
Article 41 Relations with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office 1. maintain a special relationship with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office based on close cooperation and the development of operational, administrative and management links between them as defined below. To this end, the European Public Prosecutor and the President of Eurojust shall meet on a regular basis to discuss issues of common concern. 2. support emanating from the European Public Prosecutor’s Office without undue delay, and shall deal with such requests, where appropriate, as if they had been received from a national authority competent for judicial cooperation. 3. shall make use of the Eurojust National Coordination Systems established in accordance with Article 20, as well as the relations it has established with third countries, including its liaison magistrates, in order to support the cooperation established in accordance with paragraph 1. 4. The cooperation established in accordance with paragraph 1 shall entail the exchange of information, including personal data. Any data thus exchanged shall only be used for the purposes for which it was provided. Any other usage of the data shall only be allowed in as far as such usage falls within the mandate of the body receiving the data, and subject to the prior authorisation of the body which provided the data. 5. whether information available at Eurojust matches with information processed by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, Eurojust shall put in place a mechanism for automatic cross-checking of data entered into its Case Management System. Whenever a match is found between data entered into the Case Management System by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and data entered by Eurojust, the fact that there is a match will be communicated to both Eurojust and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, as well as the Member State which provided the data to Eurojust. In cases where the data was provided by a third party, Eurojust shall only inform that third party of the match found with the consent of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. 6. inform the European Public Prosecutor’s Office which staff members shall be authorised to have access to the results of the cross-checking mechanism. 7. functioning of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office through services to be supplied by its staff. Such support shall deleted Eurojust shall establish and Eurojust shall treat any request for Whenever necessary, Eurojust For the purpose of identifying Eurojust shall designate and Eurojust shall support the technical support in the technical support in staff security services; Information Technology services; fin any case include: a) preparation of the annual budget, the programming document cial management, accountaining the annual and multiannual programming and the management plan; b) recruitment and career-management; c) d) e) and audit services; f) interest. The details of the services to be provided shall be laid down in an agreement between Eurojust and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. 8. may address written opinions to the College, to which the College shall respond in writing without undue delay. Such written opinions shall in any case be presented whenever the College adopts the annual budget and work programme.any other services of common The European Public Prosecutor
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 170 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 2
2. OLAF may contribute to Eurojust’s coordination work regarding the protection of the financial interests of the Union, in accordance with its mandate under Regulation (EU, Euratom) of the European Parliament and of the Council No .../2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999.deleted
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 172 #
Gilles LEBRETON, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 3
3. For purposes of the receipt and transmission of information between Eurojust and OLAF, and without prejudice to Article 8, Member States shall ensure that the national members of Eurojust shall be regarded as competent authorities of the Member States solely for the purposes of Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/199919. The exchange of information between OLAF and national members shall be without prejudice to the information which must be given to other competent authorities under those Regulations. __________________ 19deleted OJ L 136, 31.5.1999, p. 8.
2017/09/06
Committee: JURI
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation