1966 Amendments of Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
Amendment 41 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the importance of the active and constructive participation of members of Assembly in plenary sessions; underlines the importance of orderly arrangements of Assembly work plan and of decision-making processes, time adequate and open parliamentary debates, consultations with stakeholders, avoidance of fast-track procedures of adoption of sensitive laws;
Amendment 57 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. UNotes how free, fair and transparent elections are crucial for democratic future of Kosovo as well as future of its EU integration process; urges the Kosovar authorities to comprehensively deal with previously identified electoral shortcomings by enacting timely legislative and administrative measures to address the outstanding recommendations of EU and, European Parliament observation missions and Venice Commission well in advance of the next round of elections; welcomes the external audit of political party financing that has confirmed serious violations of political party finance legislation and strongly urges strengthening and enforcing of the overall legal framework; stresses the need for affirmative action to overcome the obstacles that prevent women from participating in politics and being elected;
Amendment 73 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Is concerned that Kosovo continues to be a storage and transit country for hard drugs; welcomes setting up of secure storage for seized drugs prior to destruction; expresses serious concerns about the low rate of convictions in cases against human trafficking, despite Kosovo being a source, transit and destination for trafficked women and children; notes with concern the existence of armed groups and their involvement in organised criminal activities operating across borders;
Amendment 88 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Considers it essential to implement, in a timely and comprehensive manner, the recommendations of the Kosovar Ombudsmaperson, Auditor General, Anti- Corruption Agency and the Public Procurement Regulatory Commission; stresses the need to remedy deficiencies in the public procurement system and to improve interinstitutional cooperation and the exchange of information; recommends the stepping up of monitoring, evaluation and audit capabilities and the adoption and implementation of an anti-fraud strategy to protect Kosovo and the EU’s financial interests;
Amendment 154 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Regrets the lack of implementation of legal framework for gender equality, and strategy and action plan on protection against domestic violence; is concerned with high discrimination of women in the labour market, the judiciary and the police; notes with disappointment the challenges women face with property ownership and inheritance; urges without delay a strong gender mainstreaming in laws and policies; stresses the need for introduction of legal definitions of domestic violence and sexual harassment in the Criminal Code, and for sustainably funded shelters for victims of gender- based violence and human trafficking;
Amendment 169 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Urges of the need to ensure the editorial freedom, financial sustainability and independence of the Kosovar public broadcaster, and to guarantee transparency of private media ownership; urges for implementation of all relevant laws in this regard; calls for improvements to multilingual broadcasting and to the quality of information offered to all Kosovar communities;
Amendment 206 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Highlights Kosovo's proactive participation and constructive role in regional and international cooperation trough the "Berlin process" and the Western Balkans six initiative, welcomes the outcome of the Sofia Summit 2018 and the adoption of IPA 2018 package the strategically important infrastructure project “Nis-Merdare-Pristina” highway of peace; the project will enable a better transport connection between central Serbia and Kosovo and it has symbolic significance for relations in the region;
Amendment 210 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Highlights the urgent need to adopt and implement measures ensuring transparent and competitive privatisation procedures and to investigate alleged irregularities; is concerned that migrant remittances constitute an important driver of domestic demand; expresses concern about discrimination of women on labour market, especially in hiring process;
Amendment 216 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Call on the Commission to develop a regional strategy to address the persistent youth unemployment and brain drain by tackling the skills mismatch between the education system and the labour market, improving the quality of teaching, and ensuring adequate funding for active labour market measures and vocational training schemes, along with adequate childcare and pre-school education facilities; regrets that there is no progress on improving the quality of education; is concerned that overall spending on education is dominated by the wage bill, as well as that early childcare and pre-schooling enrolment rates are very low at 4.4 % and 33.9 % respectively, which is well below the EU target of 95 % by 2020;
Amendment 223 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Draws attention to the extremely poor air quality of Pristina and other heavily polluted Western Balkan cities; calls for effective air and water quality monitoring systems, for the improvement of water treatment infrastructure and for reliable and readily available real-time pollution data;
Amendment 228 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Notes that most of last report's recommendation on energy policies are not implemented and stresses the need to move away from the use of lignite for unsustainable energy generation and stresses the urgency of decommissioning Kosovo A Power Station and of ensuring additional sustainable generation and import capacity; notes partial progress on the Third Energy Package and stresses the need to ensure the independence of the Kosovar energy regulator; calls for stronger efforts in energy efficiency and energy saving, particularly in the construction sector; calls the authorities to adopt the law on energy efficiency and to establish the Energy Efficiency Fund;
Amendment 232 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
35. Regrets the lack of progress in exploiting the potential of renewables and calls on; calls the authorities to adopt the action plan for energy strategy 2017-2026 for reaching the mandatory renewable energy target of 25% in 2020; urges the Commission to step up assistance in this regard;
Amendment 17 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas tens or even hundreds of decisions of Constitutional Court are not implemented which questions the legality of establishment of BiH;
Amendment 51 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets that no compromise has been reached with regard to changes to the electoral legislation required to implement the Constitutional Court decision in the Ljubić case on the election of the members of the Federation House of Peoples; urges all political leaders to show responsibility and amend swiftly the electoral framework in order to ensure smooth implementation of the results of the elections; stresses that holding credible elections and implementing the results is an essential feature of a well-functioning democracy, as well as a requirement for any country aspiring to join the EU; reiterates that all acts of election irregularities should be investigated and condemned in the clearest possible terms, and any unlawful activities prosecuted;
Amendment 52 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Firmly reiterates the need of rapid formation of the Federation House of Peoples in line with rulings by the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina; expresses deep concern because of the risks of complete dysfunctionality of the Presidency of BiH; regrets the possibility of election of the member of the presidency of BiH against democratic will of Peoples that he is to represent which points toward much needed reform of the election process in BiH;
Amendment 60 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Deplores the fact that delegates from BiH have still been unable to agree on the rules of procedure for the SAPC, due to the attempts to introduce ethnic blocking into the SAPC's voting rules, which has consequently not met for three years; regrets the failure to cooperate with the European Parliament and, recalls that this is a clear breach of the obligations stemming from the SAA and urges all actors to agree to and accept Rules and procedures of the SAPC based on the recommendation of the European Parliament's opinion on the subject;
Amendment 64 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes incoherent legal framework for inclusive and evidence-based policy as well as its legislative development which hinders effective implementation; is concerned about the lack of systematic regulatory impact assessments and public consultations, the limited quality of and practice in monitoring and reporting and lack of a formal requirement to publish key government planning documents;
Amendment 104 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Notes that legislation without implementation is futile and urges swift implementation of legal provisions providing equality between women and men; firmly points at the lack of effective implementation of legislation on the prevention and protection which facilitates gender-based violence, in particular domestic violence; urges aligning of the relevant legislation with the Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence; is concerned that the number of protective measures issued remains low, and calls for improvement of the general system of response and support to victims; draws attention to the fact that the existing safe houses remain in most cases strongly underfunded, which is in breach of existing legislation;
Amendment 110 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Is concerned about lack of educational and economy reforms that fosters high youth unemployment and high economic emigration which will have long-term consequences on country’s demography; notes with concern a high gender imbalance of labour force participation rates;
Amendment 134 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Acknowledges that some progress has been made in establishing institutional mechanisms of cooperation between authorities and civil society organisations (CSOs) and in ensuring public financing for CSOs; reiterates its call for the adoption of a strategic framework of cooperation with civil society at all levels of governance; urges authorities to open an effective dialogue with social partners which could in turn produce legislative and capacity-building initiatives needed in order to strengthen the capability of social partners;
Amendment 138 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Remains concerned by the widespread corruption in BiH and the persistent gap between the declared political will to fight it and the lack of concrete results; underlines that there is a lack of track record of high profile cases and that legal and institutional framework for combating systemic corruption like political party finance, public procurement, conflict of interest, and assets declaration is weak and inadequate; calls for steps to be taken to improve the legal and institutional anti- corruption framework in line with European standards, by better harmonising the action plans adopted at various levels, implementing the existing strategies and enhancing the cooperation between corruption prevention bodies and with the aAnti-corruption agency;
Amendment 142 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes the adoption of the action plan on the implementation of the 2014-2018 Justice Sector Reform Strategy in March 2017 and the establishment of the necessary reporting and monitoring structures; points to the need for decisive action regarding its implementation; is concerned by continuing politically motivated threats against the judiciary; reiterates the need to strengthen the independence of the judiciary, including from political influence, as well as its impartiality, professionalism, efficiency and accountability; welcomes the implementation of the action plan adoptedadopted detailed action plan to implement the European Commission's recommendations on issues within the HJPC remit by the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council (HJPC) aimed at strengthening appointment, disciplinary and integrity measures as regards the judiciary; urges for a swift adoption of related legislative acts and start of its implementation;
Amendment 151 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Deplores any kind of glorification of persons convicted for the gravest crimes against humanity; calls, as a matter of urgency, for respect for victims of war crimes and for reconciliation to be promoted; reminds all political leaders and institutions in BiH that they have a responsibility to assess war-time events objectively, in the interests of truth, reconciliation and a peaceful future, and to avoid misuse of judiciary for political purposes;
Amendment 156 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Acknowledges that some progress has been achieved in the implementation of Annex VII to the Dayton Peace Agreement on refugees and internally displaced persons; calls again for significant attention to be devoted to damages compensation for property that cannot be returned, access to healthcare and employment, social protection, safety and education; notes that there are still extremely high number of internally displaced persons (98,324 according to UNHCR data from 2017), 47,000 minority returnees and a huge number of refugees; is concerned with persistently high number of missing persons and slow progress in that respect; urges resumption of operations of the Commission for Real Property Claims of Displaced Persons and Refugees; calls again for significant attention to be devoted to damages compensation for property that cannot be returned, access to healthcare and employment, social protection, safety and education; deplores cases of attacks against properties of returnees; calls on the authorities to embark on intensive cooperation between the two entities, and strengthen the efforts to find persons still missing as a result of the war, including full sharing of all relevant military and intelligence data;
Amendment 165 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Commends Bosnia and Herzegovina authorities' efforts to stop departures of its citizens to foreign battlefields since 2015 as well as conviction of 23 returned foreign terrorist fighters for terrorism-related offences, but urges authorities to apply appropriate sentencing for foreign terrorist fighters and to manage their subsequent social re- integration; notes with concern that the cells of radicalisation have been identified in certain locations in the country, in particular in the Wahhabi communities;
Amendment 180 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Urges Bosnia and Herzegovina to fully align itself with relevant EU declarations and Council decisions concerning CFSP and CSDP; strongly urges BiH to align itself with Council decisions introducing EU restrictive measures in the context of Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea and events in eastern Ukraine and deplores deliberate lack of cooperation from some political actors;
Amendment 2 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to the General Affairs Council decision of 25 June 2018,
Amendment 29 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Fully supports the Commission’s recommendation that accession negotiations be opened in recognition of the reform efforts made by Albania; calls on the Council to open accession talks without delay in order to sustain the reform momentum; considers that the opening of negotiations would provide further incentives for the reform process and enhance its scrutiny; calls on the Albanian Government and other political actors to make all possible efforts to enable the Council open the Accession talks in June 2019 at the latest;
Amendment 42 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates that constructive political dialogue, willingness to compromise and the maintenance of is vital; stresses that the lack of confidence and radicalisation of the situation could be detrimental to the reforms, in particular in the judicial field; therefore, calls both the majority and opposition parties to maintain an unwavering commitment to the implementation and consolidation of the reforms across all five key priorities are essential to the effort to advanceof the EU accession process;
Amendment 55 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Urges the Albanian authorities to complete as soon as possible the establishment of the new judicial bodies; underlines the need to back effective functioning of these institutions by means of adequate human resources and funding;
Amendment 58 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the continued progress made towards establishing a more citizen- friendly, transparent, professional and de- politicised public administration, including at local level; urges the full implementation of the oversight institutions’ recommendations as well as Ombudsperson’s recommendations; notes as well the progress made with regard to territorial reform and the establishment of the Consultative Council to improve coordination between central and local governments; welcomes the setting up of local EU Desks and EU co-ordinators;
Amendment 63 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Commends the significant improvements made in the legal and institutional framework with a view to preventing and eradicating corruption in public institutions, as corruption is still a major point of concern; calls for additional efforts to reduce the corruption affecting the daily life of Albania’s citizens;
Amendment 64 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Commends the significant improvements made in the legal and institutional framework with a view to preventing and eradicating corruption in public institutions; calls for additional efforts to reduce the corruption affecting the daily life of Albania’s citizens, starting with revision of shortcomings in the legal framework of Law on the Right to Information;
Amendment 66 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the recent updates to the country’s anti-corruption legislation; stresses the need to complete the establishment of the National Bureau of Investigation, the Special Tribunal and the Special Prosecution Against Corruption and Organised Crime; reiterates the crucial importance of the implementation of an all-inclusive and impartial vetting process; notes that the correct implementation has a positive impact on the reliability of the process and ensure the trust of the people in the judicial bodies; calls on the Government to take actions against former high officials who did not submit their criminal records; calls for further improvement of the inter- institutional cooperation and exchange of information between police and prosecution; welcomes the re-evaluation of the law enforcement personnel under the police vetting law;
Amendment 69 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls for increased attention to be given to political and public-private corruption, and stresses that a convincing track record can only be attained through proactive investigations, prosecutions and final convictions in corruption cases at all levels, including high-level cases related to the so-called 'big fish';
Amendment 70 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Reiterates that Private and Public Partnership (PPP) has become a sensitive issue in Albania, as stressed by the European Commission and the US State Department; therefore calls on the Government to seriously review the PPP practices to date, restrict their scope of application, increase public transparency, take into consideration their efficiency and avert corruption cases;
Amendment 72 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Welcomes the progress made in the fight against organised crime, including the substantial progress made in seizures of illicit drugs and the reduction of cannabis cultivation; notes Albania’s intensified international police cooperation – leading to effective operations against criminal networks – including in joint working groups with Member States;
Amendment 73 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Welcomes the progress made by the Government in the fight against corruption and organised crime, including the substantial progress made in seizures of illicit drugs and the reduction ofreducing cannabis cultivation; reiterates that these matters constitute the most serious barrier for the opening of the negotiation; welcomes that the Albanian Police is becoming more active in the fight against organized crime and cannabis cultivation; noteswelcomes hence Albania’s intensified international police cooperation – leading to effective operations against criminal networks – including in joint working groups with Member States, such as the Italian 'Guardia di Finanza';
Amendment 93 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Welcomes the equal representation of women in the new government and increased percentage of women parliamentarians; commends adoption of resolution on the fight against gender- based violence and establishment of parliamentary sub-committee on gender equality; urges further efforts to ensure that all strategies and policies are gender mainstreamed; is concerned about still existing gender-discriminatory provisions in a number of laws, lagging access to justice for women, and proportion of women in the informal labour market, especially the textile and shoe industries, without adequate labour and social protection;
Amendment 107 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Albanian authorities to enhance cooperation with civil society organisations, ensuring effective public participation and consultation throughout the decision-making process, including at local level; urges the authorities to make significant developments in the legal and regulatory framework of the tax regime for CSOs as well as public funding;
Amendment 130 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Welcomes Albania’s commitment to implement the Connectivity Agenda in the framework of the Berlin Process; supports the proposal to reduce roaming fees in the Western Balkans and the adoption of IPA 2018 package that includes the strategically important infrastructure project the reconstruction of Durrës Port, which is strengthening Albania's connections with Croatia and Italy and providing Albania’s landlocked neighbours, Kosovo and Macedonia access to maritime transport routes; supports the proposal to reduce roaming fees in the Western Balkans; notes that rural areas represent 40% of the population but only 1% out of this is connected to the internet;
Amendment 139 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Expresses concern over economic activity that has led to environmental damage in protected areas, such as the hydropower plants along the Vjosa river; urges the authorities to step up environmental impact assessments and public consultations on such projects; calls for stronger efforts in energy efficiency, and in this regard encourages Albanian authorities to fully align its Energy Efficiency Law with the acquis; notes that Albania has to remove legal and contractual obstacles for integrating energy markets, and the unbundling of energy companies should be finalized;
Amendment 149 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Expresses concern that Albania remains the Western Balkan country from which are made the highest number of illegal entries and stays, and unfounded asylum claims, in Member States; notes that a high percentage of young people and students are leaving the country because of the lack of jobs and decent living conditions; calls on the Government to address with priority this growing concern; recommends a shorthand medium term plan of action with concrete measures on boosting employment, education, living conditions and health;
Amendment 153 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Expresses concern that Albania remains the Western Balkan country from which are made the highest number of illegal entries and stays, and unfounded asylum claims, in Member States; urges Albania to apply the return procedures which are compliant with the Law on Foreigners and to ensure its return mechanism for irregular migrants is in line with the EU acquis;
Amendment 154 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29 a. Reiterates the importance of freedom of movement of Albanian citizens among the EU countries; calls on the Government to ensure that Albanian citizens born in Greece, holding valid Albanian passport, cross the Greek- Albanian border without any restriction; calls hence on the Government to update the passports of those citizens replacing as place of birth the name of the village/city with the name of the country;
Amendment 157 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 b (new)
Paragraph 29 b (new)
29 b. Calls on the Albanian Government to abide by the provisions of the Art.3 of the European Convention on extradition, issued by the Council on Europe, and of the Art.19 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and not to allow any extradition for political offences, or when the person may be subject to torture or inhuman treatment in the country soliciting extradition, having particular regard to the situation of Turkish citizens residing in the Republic of Albania;
Amendment 159 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Commends Albania’s success in stemming the outflow of foreign fighters; welcomes the regional cooperation that has been achieved in countering potential terrorist threats; calls for further measures to disrupt financial flows aimed at financing terrorism and to address online radicalisation, to strengthen the prevention and monitoring mechanisms involving civil society and religious communities, and to address online radicalisation; calls on the government to improve programmes to reintegrate returnees and their families and to prevent radicalisation in prisons;
Amendment 25 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas Serbia has been continuously engaged in the normalisation of relations with Kosovo, resulting in the First Agreement on the Principles of Normalisation of Relations of 19 April 2013 and the August 2015 agreements; whereas Serbia has remained engaged in the dialogue;
Amendment 36 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the continued engagement of Serbia on the path of integration into the European Union; calls on Serbia to actively promote this strategic decision among the Serbian public;
Amendment 41 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that the thorough implementation of reforms and policies remainis a key indicator of a successful integration process; calls on Serbia to improve the planning, coordination and monitoring of the implementation of new legislation and policies;
Amendment 55 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the progress made by Serbia in developing a functioning market economy, ensuring economic growth and preserving macroeconomic and monetary stability; stresses that although Serbia has made good progress in addressing some of the policy weaknesses that have been an issue in the past, in particular through budget consolidation, unemployment and economic inactivity are still high, particularly among women and youth and the private sector is underdeveloped and hampered by weaknesses in the rule of law and the enforcement of fair competition; underlines that the restructuring and privatisation of state- owned enterprises has partially advanced; stresses the paramount importance to Serbia’s economy of small and medium- sized enterprises (SMEs) which face a number of challenges, including high and unpredictable para-fiscal charges, and difficult and costly access to finance;
Amendment 63 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Takes note of the presidential elections on 2 April 2017; welcomesnotes some improvement of the general conduct of the elections; calls on the authorities to fully address the recommendations of the OSCE/ODIHR election observation mission, but regrets prevailing violations that hamper fair and efficient electoral process, such as unbalanced media coverage, pressure on voters and employees of state-affiliated structures, and a misuse of administrative resources; calls on the authorities to fully address the recommendations of the OSCE/ODIHR election observation mission, including a comprehensive and inclusive review of the legal framework on elections to address gaps and loopholes, shortcomings in the transparency of party and campaign financing, the need for strict separation of party and state activities, and the need for independent regulatory bodies to exercise their monitoring and oversight role proactively and effectively;
Amendment 76 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on Serbia to progressively align its foreign and security policy to that of the EU, including its policy on Russia; welcomes Serbia’s important contribution and continued participation in international peacekeeping operationsthe EU missions, roster of the EU Battle Groups, and international peacekeeping operations; is concerned about Serbia's continuing military cooperation with Russia, including procurement of strategic arms and joint military exercises in vicinity of the EU borders; notes with concern the ratification of agreement on cooperation and joint action between Serbia’s Ministry of Interior and the Russian Federal Protective Service which could infringe on its obligations under EU accession negotiations related to data protection and exchange of classified information;
Amendment 82 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Commends Serbia’s constructive approach in managing the effects of the migration and refugee crisis, and the substantial efforts the country has made to provide shelter and humanitarian supplies, primarily with EU support; urges Serbia to progressively align its visa policy with that of the EU, and to put in place a robust return mechanism for irregular migrants, which is in line with the EU acquis;
Amendment 120 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that the Serbian parliament still does not exercise effective oversight of the executive, and that the transparency, inclusiveness and quality of the legislative process need to be enhanced; welcomes the declining use of urgent procedures to adopt legislation; stresses, however, that the still- frequent use of urgent procedures undermines parliamentary and public scrutiny; stresses that actions that limit the ability of the Serbian parliament to conduct an effective debate on, and scrutiny of, legislation should be avoided; welcomes the Serbian parliament’s continued efforts to improve transparency through debates on Serbia’s negotiating positions on EU accession chapters, and through exchanges with the core negotiating team and with the National Convention on the European Union; stresses that the role of independent regulatory bodies, including the country’s Ombudsmaperson, needs to be fully acknowledged and supported; is concerned that for the last two years the government has not issued a report on the implementation of the Ombudsperson’s recommendations;
Amendment 149 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on authorities to promote a climate of tolerance and to condemn all forms of hate speech, public approval and denial of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes by implementing provisions of Criminal Code; calls for effective investigation of high-profile war crimes cases; calls for improving regional cooperation in war crime cases;
Amendment 151 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Welcomes the alignment of the Criminal Code and the Law on Prevention of Domestic Violence with the Istanbul Convention; urges swift adoption of the new Gender Equality Law drafted by the coordination body for gender equality as well as new national strategy and action plan for combating violence against women in family and partner relationships that expired in 2015; is concerned about wide gender gaps in the areas of labour, time use, political participation, property and access to resources, as well as prevalent discrimination against women with disabilities, older, rural and Roma women; condemns the role of the media in perpetuating gender stereotypes and minimising gender-based violence;
Amendment 167 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Is concerned that a national strategy for an enabling environment for civil society organisations (CSOs) and its accompanying action plan has not been adopted; strongly condemns government's and government managed media's negative campaign towards CSOs; urges better definition of criteria for public financial support to ensure overall transparency as the lack of financial sustainability of CSOs affects the potential of social entrepreneurship to address local community needs and stimulate employment and economic growth;
Amendment 190 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Invites the Serbian government to fully implement all international treaties concerning minority rights such as agreement with Republic of Croatia from 2005 on protection of rights of Croatian national minority in Serbia; calls on the authorities to protect existing media and programs in minority languages during the process of privatisation;
Amendment 194 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Welcomes the adoption of the new Roma social inclusion strategy for the period 2016-2025 along with an action plan covering education, health, housing and employment; calls for full implementation of the new strategy for Roma inclusion and the action plan; is concerned with the high rate of school drop outs, especially for Roma girls who are forced into child marriages;
Amendment 215 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the adoption of a national strategy for the investigation and prosecution of war crimes; notes the adoption of a prosecutorial strategy for investigation and prosecution of war crimes and calls on Serbia to implement decisively all foreseen activities; welcomes the appointment in May 2017 of a new war crimes prosecutor; reiterates its call for the efficient and dedicated implementation of thise National strategy, in particular by means of bringing forward indictments, and for the adoption of an operational prosecutorial strategy; calls for effective investigation of high- profile war crimes cases; calls on Serbia to again cooperate fully with the current Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals; urges the Serbian authorities to continue working on the issue of the fate of missing persons; highlights the importance of the work carried out by the Regional Youth Cooperation Office (RYCO) and its local branches in promoting reconciliation among the youth and with its regional partners in war crime cases; urges the Serbian authorities to express their political commitment to dealing with the consequences of armed conflicts; urges the Serbian authorities to continue working on the issue of the fate of missing persons, including opening state archives related to the war period; urges Serbia to prepare a reparations scheme for victims and their families as an important precondition for reconciliation; points out that a new law on civilian victims should be adopted without any undue delay; highlights the importance of the work carried out by the Regional Youth Cooperation Office (RYCO) and its local branches in promoting reconciliation among the youth; reiterates its support for the initiative to establish the Regional Commission for the establishment of facts about war crimes and other serious violations of human rights committed in the former Yugoslavia, and urges the Serbian government to take the lead on its establishment;
Amendment 228 #
Amendment 229 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on Serbia to implement fully the connectivity reform measures in the energy sector; encouragescalls on Serbia to fully unbundle Serbiajagas and to develop competition in the gas market; welcomes the country’s efforts to promote investments in the fields of energy efficiency and renewable energyrecalls that the legislation on efficient use of energy and on the energy performance of buildings is not fully in line with the corresponding EU Directives; urges Serbia to develop a system of sustainable financing for energy efficiency projects in order to achieve the targets;
Amendment 235 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the joint commitment signed by Serbia and Bulgaria on 17 May 2018, on the occasion of the Western Balkans summit of Leaders in Sofia, to build the gas interconnector between the two countries and the adoption of IPA 2018 package that includes the strategically important infrastructure project “Nis-Merdare-Pristina highway of peace” that will enable a better transport connection between central Serbia and Kosovo and has symbolic significance for relations in the region;
Amendment 7 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas Montenegro has to further strengthen, inter alia, parliamentary, legislative and oversight capacity, institutional transparency, respect for the rule of law, domestic handling of war crimes cases, integrity of the electoral process, media freedom, and the fight against corruption, organised crime and the informal economy;
Amendment 22 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that fundamental freedoms were respected in the April 2018 presidential elections; calls for shortcomings identified by the OSCE ODIHR to be comprehensively addressed in order to improve public trust in the electoral process, notes that frequent local elections cause ‘election fatigue’ that hinders quality of and transparent elections and calls for comprehensive electoral reform;
Amendment 30 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the efforts made to improve the transparency of public administration and information sharing but would encourage steps towards establishing a more citizen- friendly, professional and de-politicised public administration; calls for improved regulatory impact assessments, comprehensive reports on audit and inclusive public consultations on law proposals; stresses the importance of cooperation with the CSOs;
Amendment 37 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the moderate progress made towards increasing the independence, transparency, accountability, professionalism and efficiency of judicial institutions; calls for safeguards against political interference, but notes with the concern that the corruption in judiciary is still prevalent; calls for safeguards against political interference, particularly of Anti- Corruption Agency, proactive attitude of institutions, and for a coherent application of codes of ethics and disciplinary measures; welcomes the fact that new judges and prosecutors have been appointed for the first time using the new recruitment system;
Amendment 42 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Is concerned by the increasing instances of violence and assassinations linked to organised crime, which have a detrimental effect on the daily life of ordinary citizens; welcomes the fact that the authorities have identified this issue but calls for more robust preventative action and production of a convincing track record against money laundering and human trafficking;
Amendment 75 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Reiterates its call for systematic, inclusive, timely and genuine consultations with civil society on key EU-related legislative reforms, including their implementation at local level; stresses the need to improve financial regulatory environment for CSOs;
Amendment 80 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. UHighlights the need to ensure effective implementation of fundamental rights policies on gender equality, disability rights, rights of the child and Roma rights by securing sufficient budget allocation to implement the policies, improve the capacity of responsible institutions and increase their inter- institutional coordination; urges improvement in the enforcement and monitoring mechanisms for human rights protection, including by tackling violence against women and children, highlighting the findings of the recent evaluation of the child rights monitoring system in Montenegro;
Amendment 98 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Urges that the full potential offered by digital tools in the field of land registry, invoicing and the issuing of construction permits be used; notes the need to speed up the roll-out of broadband access to businesses and households; stresses the need for government-wide interoperability framework to support further digitalisation and simplification of administrative and business procedures;
Amendment 101 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Welcomes regulatory changes in the field of education; urges the authorities to address and efforts to increase pre-school participation rates, including by children from disadvantaged backgrounds and highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach to early childhood development including by addressing health concerns such as the low immunization coverage; encourages continued curricular reform in primary and secondary education to teach basic and transversal skills and focus on learning outcomes; urges the authorities to address the low secondary education completion among Roma students (3%, the lowest in the region) and the high long-term unemployment rate among youth, Roma and women;
Amendment 108 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Welcomes Montenegro’s strengthened participation in the Erasmus+ programme and expresses its support for the Commission’s proposal to double the Erasmus+ budget; encourages stronger coordination on horizontal issues affecting youth employment, inclusion, active citizenship, volunteering and education;
Amendment 114 #
Amendment 117 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Notes that the development of additional hydropower and tourism capacities must meet EU environmental standards; urges the further exploitation of potential renewables and energy-efficiency measures and the improvement of water and waste management; urges the Montenegrin authorities to fully align national legislation with the Renewable Energy Directive and Energy Performance of Buildings Directive;
Amendment 123 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29 a. Highlights Montenegro's proactive participation and constructive role in regional and international cooperation trough the "Berlin process" and the Western Balkans six initiative, welcomes the outcome of the Sofia Summit 2018 and the adoption of IPA 2018 package that includes funding of two important infrastructure projects “Budva bypass” on the Adriatic Ionian Corridor and “Vrbnica- Bar railway section” on Orient/East-Med Corridor; emphasizes the importance of those traffic routes that are the direct link between Balkan countries and the EU markets;
Amendment 131 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Urges Montenegro to intensify its efforts in proactively prioritising and punishing war crimes and clarifying the fate of missing persons; welcomes the efforts for reintegration of displaced persons under the Regional Housing Programmeis concerned that the Special Prosecutor's Office (SPO) opened eight new cases in 2016 of which six are still in preliminary investigation phase, as well as that in all cases SPO had to rely on letters rogatory to ICTY & prosecution services of neighbouring countries; notes with disappointment that there is still no charges for command responsibility, co-perpetration and aiding and abetting, and that the judicial decisions reached contained legal mistakes and shortcomings in application of international humanitarian law; welcomes the efforts for reintegration of displaced persons under the Regional Housing Programme; urges the insurance of the equal access to justice for all victims, reparations in line with national legislation; stresses the need to fight the impunity;
Amendment 8 #
2018/2099(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the rules-based world order is being increasingly challenged both at the political-military level and, more recently, at the commercial-economic one, and that the societal, ecological, economic, technological and geopolitical trends point to the growing vulnerability of the world's population to shocks and stresses; notes that these systemic challenges are being accompanied by the continuous deterioration of the international environment confronted with interstate conflicts, natural disasters, extreme weather events, water crises, terrorism, state failure and cyber and hybrid attacks on the foundational pillars of our societies; acknowledges that the defence of the rules-based international order and the values defended by liberal democracies should be of the outmost priority and should be approached without compromise;
Amendment 15 #
2018/2099(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that these challenges are too vast to be successfully met by any single country; is firmly convinced that EU's vulnerability is direct outcome of the lack of integration as well as lack of coordination; emphasises that it is vital for the EU to respond to these challenges, consistently, effectively and with one voice; notes that the CSDP is a useful tool for addressing many of these challenges; points out that the CSDP institutions are in place as well as its many instruments and urges Members States to use them without delay;
Amendment 37 #
2018/2099(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises, however, that to this date cooperation is still in a developing stage and much more needs to be done to ensure that the EU and Member States reap the rewards of deep, and sustained, long-term cooperation on defence that will lead to common EU defence;
Amendment 40 #
2018/2099(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Emphasises practical and financial benefits of further integrations of European defence capabilities; underlines that through comprehensive and trustworthy work of all stakeholders, it is possible to increase the scope and efficiency of defence spending without the increase of defence spending itself;
Amendment 71 #
2018/2099(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the creation of a dedicated title for defence in the Commission’s MFF proposal, and in particular the establishment of a budget line from which the European Defence Fund and Military Mobility projects will be funded; is of the opinion that these decisions will, most probably, call for a centralized management on defence at Commission level; underlines that funding from that budget line should be exclusively spent for defence purposes without politicization as security is indivisible and should be coherent with the capability and infrastructure needs of Member States and in line with the EU’s aspirations for strategic defence autonomy;
Amendment 87 #
2018/2099(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. CUrges the establishment of precise and binding guidelines to provide a well- defined framework for future activation and implementation of Article 42(7) TEU; calls, therefore, for the conceptualization and adoption of a EU Security and Defence White Book that will guarantee that future capability building processes will be based on EU´s strategic security interests in accordance with military and industrial necessities;
Amendment 105 #
2018/2099(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Reaffirms the importance of developing the necessary military capabilities to deal with the comprehensive security challenges in and around Europe outlined by the EU Global Strategy as the facilitation of the EU security is firstly and chiefly EU obligation; recalls that European Union´s Global Strategy encourages the realization of deep defence cooperation that would lead, as stipulated in the Lisbon Treaty, to a common EU defence;
Amendment 120 #
2018/2099(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Considers that EU Member States jointly must cover the full-spectrum of land, air, space, maritime and cyber capabilities, including strategic enablers, to defend themselvesEU and contribute to EU´s Common Security and Defence Policy;
Amendment 131 #
2018/2099(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Considers that the capabilities for the Union`s security and defence could be improved by making better use of the existing frameworks of defence and military cooperation such as the European multinational high readiness corps HQs and the EU battlegroups; believes that this will contribute to the continuous transformation of national armed forces, towards the goal of being more interoperable, more sustainable, more flexible and more deployable, and a final goal of common EU army; invites the Council to investigate, for example, the feasibility of potentially setting-up a permanent Spearhead Europe Force, which could be drawing on the European multinational high readiness corps HQ in Strasbourg, Szczecin and Münster; considers that the EU battle groups should grow into full- scale brigades and should be assigned to the corps HQ on a permanent basis;
Amendment 133 #
2018/2099(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Urges Council to take concrete steps towards the harmonisation and standardisation of the European armed forces, in accordance to Article 42(2), in order to facilitate the cooperation of armed forces personnel under the umbrella of a new European Defence Union as a step in progressive framing of a common Union defence policy;
Amendment 149 #
2018/2099(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Stresses that the use of all possibilities provided for in the Treaty would improve competitiveness and functioning of the defence industry in the single market, further stimulate defence cooperation through positive incentives, and targeting projects that Member States are not able to undertake, reducing unnecessary duplication, and promoting a more efficient use of public money; is of opinion that the outputs of these strategic cooperative programmes have great potential to be dual-use technologies and as such bring extra added value to Member States; emphasises on development of European capabilities and an integrated defence market;
Amendment 170 #
2018/2099(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Calls for the formation of the European Intelligence Agency with the mission and capability to implement a de facto transversal intelligence network within the Member States allowing the European Union to react in a comprehensive and coordinated way to emerging threats by adhering to Article 24(3) and Article 4(3), as the comprehensive gathering of intelligence information cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, either at central level or at regional and local level, but can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Union level (Article 5(3));
Amendment 186 #
2018/2099(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Encourages the Member States participating in PESCO to set up a permanent 'European Integrated Force' composed of divisions of their national armies and to make it available to the Union for the implementation of the common security and defence policy as foreseen by Article 42(3) TEU;
Amendment 224 #
2018/2099(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Underlines that EU-NATO cooperation should be complementary and respectful of each other’s specificities and roles; iIs convinced that a stronger EU and NATO reinforce each other, creating more synergies and effectiveness for the security and defence of all partners; stresses that the EU-NATO strategic partnership is equally fundamentalimportant for the EU’s evolving CSDP and for the future of the Alliance, as well as for EU-UK relations after Brexit;
Amendment 239 #
2018/2099(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
Amendment 24 #
2018/2094(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls the importance of the common agricultural policy (CAP) in terms of the budget and of its legacy to the history of the Union; recalls that the CAP is still one of the most important and most integrated policies, which ensure food production and food security in all parts of the Union and that it will continue to contribute to building Europe’s future;
Amendment 32 #
2018/2094(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Points out that the growing problem of depopulation of rural areas must be tackled with targeted measures and with the synergy of EU policies in order to boost the sustainability of the European agricultural sector, thus supporting and encouraging young farmers of those areas;
Amendment 88 #
2018/2094(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Stresses the crucial role of Agriculture in the Union's priorities to mitigate the effect of climate change and promote a sustainable development; recalls the necessity of a strong and adequate budget for agriculture in that regard;
Amendment 94 #
2018/2094(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Acknowledges the worrying hunger problem that affects our Planet and therefore believes that the EU should seek to build resilience to food crises, thus ensuring sufficient, nutritious and affordable food, and contributing to the achievement of a "Zero Hunger World";
Amendment 17 #
2018/2086(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls for the continuation of the work of the Commission’s Working Groups responsible for assisting the Member States’ national authorities to better implement cohesion policy funds in those Member States that are lagging in terms of the absorption of ESIF funds.
Amendment 18 #
2018/2086(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Hopes thatStresses the importance of the structural reform support programme will be enhanceand hopes that the programme will be enhanced in the upcoming programming period, by spelling out its role as a facilitator rather than a source of technical assistance, and improved in terms of effectiveness and efficiency.
Amendment 7 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas border regions mostly face worse conditions for social and economic development and generally perform less well economically than other regions within the Member States;
Amendment 11 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas, in spite of the efforts already undertaken, obstacles – mainly administrative and legal barriers – still persist and hamper growtheconomic and social development and cohesion in the border regions;
Amendment 25 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that access to public services is crucial for the 150 million- strong cross-border population, and is hampered by numerous legal and administrative barriers; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to maximise their efforts to remove these barriers, especially when related to health services, transport, educationconstruction of vital physical infrastructure, education, communications, labour mobility, as well as regulation and business development;
Amendment 35 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines that the problems faced by the border regions are common to some extent, but also vary from region to region or between Member States and depend on the individual characteristics of a given region, which makes an individual approach in tackling these obstacles a necessity;
Amendment 37 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that the differing legal and institutional frameworks of the Member States can lead to legal uncertainty in the border regions, which results in an increase in the time needed and the cost of implementing the projects, and constitutes an additional obstacle for citizens, institutions and enterprises in the border regions; stresses, therefore, that greater complementarity and willingness to tackle barriers between the Member States, or at least at border region level, is desirable;
Amendment 47 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recognises the special situation of cross-border workers, who are most seriously affected by the challenges present in the border regions, including, in particular, the recognition of diplomas and other qualifications, healthcare, transport and access to information on job vacancies, social security and taxation systems; calls, in this context, on the Member States to step up their efforts to overcome these obstacles and allow for greater powers, funds and flexibility for regional and local authorities in border regions to improve the quality of life of cross-border workers;
Amendment 52 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Points to the challenges related to business activities carried out in the border regions, in particular when related to the adoption of labour and commercial law, taxation, public procurement or social security systems; calls on the Member States to better align and harmonise the relevant legal provisions and achieve convergence in regulatory frameworks, in order to allow for more flexibility in the implementation of national legislation, as well as to improve the dissemination of information on cross-border issues, e.g. by creating one-stop-shops;
Amendment 63 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that transport services are still insufficiently developed in the border regions, which hampers cross- border mobility; stresses, furthermore, that cross-border transport infrastructure is also particularly adversely affected by complex regulatory and administrative arrangements; awaits the forthcoming Commission study on missing railway links along internal EU borders; underlines that any such study or future recommendations should be based on information and experience from local and regional authorities; stresses the need to tackle transport bottlenecks, which hamper economic activities, such as transport, tourism and citizens' travel;
Amendment 76 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that mutual trust, political will and a flexible approach among multi-level stakeholders, from local to national level, are vital to overcoming the abovementioned persistent obstacles and boosting growth and development in border regions; calls, therefore, for better coordination, dialogue and a further exchange of best practices among authorities; urges the Commission and the Member States to enhance such cooperation;
Amendment 80 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines the importance of education and culture, and, in particular, the opportunities to step up efforts to promote multilingualism and intercultural dialogue in border regions;
Amendment 107 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Commission to explore the possibilities of enhancing cooperation and overcoming barriers to regional development at the external borders with neighbouring regions, in particular, with regions of those countries preparing for EU accession;
Amendment 111 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Underlines the positive role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) programmes, and in particular cross- border cooperation programmes, in the development and cohesion of border regions; calls on the Commission to preserve ETC as an important objective in the next programming period, with a more distinct role within cohesion policy post- 2020, as well as a significantly increased budget; underlines at the same time the need to simplify the programmes and reduce the administrative burdens for beneficiaries and to facilitate more investment in infrastructure projects through cross-border cooperation programmes;
Amendment 114 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Underlines the very important and positive role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) programmes in the economic and social development and cohesion of border regions; including maritime and external border regions, calls on the Commission to preserve ETC as an important objective, with a more distinct role within cohesion policy post- 2020, as well as a significantly increased budget; underlines at the same time the need to simplify the programmes and reduce the administrative burdens for beneficiaries;
Amendment 130 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Regrets that the potential of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation is not being fully exploited, which could be due partly to regional and local authorities’ reservations, and partly to their unfounded fear of a transfer of competencesand calls on the Commission to propose measures to overcome the obstacles to the effective application of this instrument;
Amendment 131 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Urges that consideration be given to the experiences of the numerous Euroregions that exist and are operating across internal and external border regions of the EU in order to further the opportunities for economic and social development and the quality of life of citizens living in border regions;
Amendment 133 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Calls for better use to be made of the potential that EU macro-regional strategies can offer to border regions;
Amendment 135 #
2018/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Underlines that the Territorial Impact Assessment contributes to a better understanding of the spatial impact of policies; calls on the Commission to consider agiving Territorial Impact Assessment ultimately being made compulsory before anya stronger role when EU legislative initiative iss are proposed;
Amendment 2 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines the importance of cohesion policy as the main investment policy of the Union that helps to reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between and within EU regions, enhances smart, sustainable and inclusive economic growth, improves SMEs competitiveness and access to global markets, fosters innovation in urban and rural areas and encourages local and regional authorities to make the transition towards a carbon freeneutral economy; notes every 1 Euro invested in cohesion policy has a proven return on investment by 174%1 and less investment would mean less growth and jobs for citizens; calls for cohesion funds to maintain their role as the main investment policy of the European Union; _________________ 1 Commission Staff Working Document of 19 September 2016 entitled ‘Ex post evaluation of the ERDF and Cohesion Fund 2007-13’ (SWD(2016)0318).
Amendment 7 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Given that, according to the latest report (30 June 2018) on disbursements broken down by Member State, some Member States are lagging quite a long way behind in terms of funds disbursed, calls on the Commission to ascertain the shortcomings and take measures with a view to improving the uptake of ESI Funds;
Amendment 14 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Highlights the need for improvements in terms of visibility and communication of EU funding both to potential beneficiaries and to EU citizens in general ; urges Commission together with Member States to raise awareness of the varied EU investment possibilities, to showcase innovative projects and to share good practices.
Amendment 15 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Points out that funding from the European territorial cooperation programmes, that is to say, for cross- border cooperation on the EU’s external borders, helps to bolster enlargement policy.
Amendment 16 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Calls on the Commission to look for further synergies and complementarities with ESIF and other research, innovation and competitiveness- related EU programs, such as Horizon, for instance to foster innovation and digitalisation in rural areas and rural economies.
Amendment 23 #
2018/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses that, thanks to all the measures taken so far, total EU contributions, according to the information currently available, amount to over EUR 5.9 billion, representing more than 28 % of the total EU allocation to Greece for the period 2014-2020;
Amendment 24 #
2018/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Points out the rate of payments to beneficiaries, which according to the available data exceeds 17 %, while the project selection rate is currently 48 % of available funds for the period 2014- 2020, does not deviate significantly from the EU average;
Amendment 34 #
2018/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Points out the differences between and the unequal absorption rates among the available ESI Funds;
Amendment 37 #
2018/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls that the ESIFs have a significant impact on GDP in several Member States, and that investment supported by cohesion policy and rural development policies in Greece is estimated to have increased GDP in 2015, at the end of the previous programming period, by just over 2% above the level it would have been in the absence of the funding provided; recalls that the use of EU structural funds shouldmust always focus on achieving real EU added value and go beyond mere GDP growth;
Amendment 52 #
2018/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Acknowledges that by supporting public investment and deploying EU investments flexibly, through the reprogramming of funds or by raising the cofinancing rate, regional policy mitigated the impact of the financial crisis and of sustained fiscal consolidation in several Member States; reiterates nevertheless that cohesion policy should be seen primarily as a catalyst to attract additional public and private funding, and that measures resulting in a reduction in the national cofinancing quotas required for receiving funding for operational programmes financed by the Structural Funds should be duly justified and only envisaged on an exceptional basisadopted and implemented only on an exceptional basis, such as in the case of the financial situation in Greece;
Amendment 74 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the European Union’s overarching objective of multifunctional agriculture, driven by family farms, remains key to delivering the positive externalities and public goods that European citizens demand;
Amendment 123 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the CAP must play an important role in overcoming stagnation and volatility of farm incomes which, despite the concentration and intensification of production and increasing productivity, are still lower than in the rest of the economy and in comparison to EU’s key competitors;
Amendment 239 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas while the focus on research and development for both product and process innovation is to be welcomed, more must be done to translate the results of research into food and farming practice, facilitated by EU-wide agricultural extension services;
Amendment 262 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas the competitive agriculture and food sector must be incentivised to continue to contribute to the environmental care and climate action objectives of the EU set out in international agreements such as the Paris Agreement and the UN SDGs;
Amendment 295 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
M. whereas the objectives of the Cork 2.0 Declaration for a Better Life in Rural Areas stipulate vibrant rural areas, multi- functionality, biodiversity in and outside agriculture, forestry, rare animal breeds and conservation crops, as well as organic agriculture, less-favoured areas and commitments in the context of Natura 2000;
Amendment 367 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the intention to simplify and modernise the CAP, but emphasises that the integrity of the single market and reaching a truly common policy must be the overriding priorities of reform;
Amendment 394 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the importance of an equal playing field for farmers;
Amendment 444 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the efforts of the Commission to establish programme design, implementation and control of an output-based approach in order to foster performance rather than compliance, while ensuring adequate monitoring via clearly defined, simple, solid and measurable indicators at EU level, including an appropriate system of quality control and penalties;
Amendment 446 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the efforts of the Commission to establish programme design, implementation and control ofn an output-based approach for the CAP with less bureaucracy, simplified procedures and greater transparency of objectives and tools, in order to foster performance rather than compliance, while ensuring adequate and proportional risk based monitoring via clearly defined, solid and measurable indicators at EU level, including an appropriate system of quality control and penalties;
Amendment 460 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines that the simplification should allow higher degree of possibility for Member States to design the necessary tools as appropriate, subject to the condition that this would not lead to a distortion of a level playing field;
Amendment 495 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to grant more flexibility to Member States and regions within the framework of the agricultural de minimis rules, while securing the integrity of the internal market;
Amendment 576 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Believes that due to different challenges affecting the EU the opportunity must be seized to simplify and modernize the CAP by better targeting the use of CAP support and move towards a market driven agriculture;
Amendment 588 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Sees furthermore this as an opportunity to modernise the financing of the CAP and to ensure that it provides maximum EU added value for all citizens;
Amendment 641 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Stresses the need to balance and mitigate any social and environmental implications of any kind of any financial arrangement of the future CAP;
Amendment 653 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines the necessity of identifying the key elements of a transparent and objective system of penalties and incentives for determining farmers’ eligibility for public funding, which should consist of voluntary, simple and mandatory measures;
Amendment 755 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Underlines that different levels of regional and national state aids, fiscal, social, environmental and other compensations and incentives provided at national level to farmers, lead to unfair competition on the single market;
Amendment 831 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls that generational renewal is a challenge faced by famers in many Member States and that eacha common European and national strategy mustis therefore needed to address this issue through a comprehensive approach, including top-ups in Pillar I and targeted measures in Pillar II, as well as by means of new financial instruments and national measures, in order to incentivise famers to pass on their farming operations;
Amendment 881 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines the importance of rural development, including the LEADER initiative, in, to supporting multi-functional agriculture and in, forestry and less favoured areas also with a view to fostering additional entrepreneurial activities and opportunities, in orderpossibilities to generate income fromlike agrio-tourism, and to securefarm diversification, sustainable production of bioenergy, community- supported agriculture and the provision of social services in rural areas;
Amendment 889 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines the importance of rural development, including the LEADER initiative, in supporting multi-functional agriculture and in fostering additional entrepreneurial activities and opportunities, in order to generate income from agri- tourism, and to secure community- supported agriculture and the provision of social services in rural areas; the overall objective has to be to improve the quality of life in rural areas;
Amendment 915 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Reminds that the overall objective has to be the improvement of the quality of life in rural areas;
Amendment 1022 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission to foster innovation, research and modernisation in agriculture by supporting training and agriculturalby supporting a strong advisory system and training better adapted to needs of CAP beneficiaries; training and extension as a pre-condition in programme design and implementation in all Member States, while fostering the transfer of know-how and the exchange ofknow-how transfer and best practice models exchange between Members States;
Amendment 1033 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission to foster innovation and modernisation in agriculture and food sector by supporting training and agricultural extension as a pre-conditionn important part in programme design and implementation in all Member States, while fostering the transfer of know-how and the exchange of best practice models between Member States;
Amendment 1060 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Underlines that the Commission should be regularly evaluating such a support and measuring innovation and modernisation wherever possible;
Amendment 1075 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Believes that investments in innovation, education and training are vital for the future of European agriculture;
Amendment 1313 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Stresses that Parliament and the Council should, via the co-decision procedure, set the generalbasic common objectives, measures and financial allocations, based on the objective indicators and determine the adequate level of flexibility needed to enable the Member States to cope with their specificities and needs in line with the single market;
Amendment 1324 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Regrets the fact thatAlthough the whole process of the CAP post-2020 programming exercise – consultation, communication, impact assessment and legislative proposals – is starting with a significant delay as the end of the eighth legislature approaches, it should not jeopardisinge the possibility of a final agreement being reached before the European elections;
Amendment 85 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas every year between 4.8 and 12.7 million tonnes of plastic waste enter the ocean;
Amendment 86 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas practically every type of plastic material and object can be found in the ocean from the Great Pacific garbage patch, containing at least 79.000 tons of plastic floating in an area of 1.6 million square kilometres, to the Earth's remotest areas such as the deep ocean floor and the Arctic;
Amendment 90 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D c (new)
Recital D c (new)
Dc. whereas plastic makes up 85 per cent of beach litter;
Amendment 91 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D d (new)
Recital D d (new)
Dd. whereas 90 per cent of all seabirds swallow plastic particles;
Amendment 273 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls for an action plan to phase out single-use plastic items within all buildings of the European Institutions;
Amendment 408 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Calls on the Commission to introduce a ban on micro-plastics which are intentionally added to products, such as cosmetics and cleaning products, and for which viable alternatives are available;
Amendment 420 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Takes note of the good practice of Operation Clean Sweep and the Port of Antwerp’s ‘zero pellet loss’ initiative; believes there is scope to replicate this initiative at EU and global level, as well as throughout the entire plastic supply chain to prevent pellet loss across the supply chain, to tackle the second largest direct source of microplastic pollution in the EU;
Amendment 430 #
2018/2035(INI)
Research and Innovation
Amendment 447 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34a. Stresses that sufficient funding of research and innovation is key to understand the source, quantification and impact of macro-, micro- and nanoplastics on the marine ecosystems and to develop innovative solutions; and calls therefore for a budget of at least €120 billion for Horizon Europe in the Multiannual Financial Framework after 2020;
Amendment 457 #
2018/2035(INI)
34b. Calls on the Commission to establish in the context of the Framework Programme 9 a 'Mission Plastic Free Ocean' to reduce plastics entering the marine environment and collect plastics present in the ocean. Asks in this context to establish a European Ocean Agency dealing with the challenges of observation, coordination and implementation of European initiatives and the management of national and European funds to tackle marine litter and other marine and maritime challenges such as climate change and acidification;
Amendment 460 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 c (new)
Paragraph 34 c (new)
34c. Highlights the innovative potential of start-ups in the context of recycling and upcycling;
Amendment 461 #
Amendment 462 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 d (new)
Paragraph 34 d (new)
34d. Calls on the Commission to step up efforts to increase ocean literacy in Europe to empower ocean engaged citizens and by doing so raise awareness about the environmental challenge of plastic pollution and other forms of marine litter;
Amendment 463 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 e (new)
Paragraph 34 e (new)
34e. Calls for an EU policy dialogue on marine litter and plastic pollution, bringing together representatives of civil society, the plastic industry, specific sectors such as the fishing, shipping and tourism, as well as scientists and politicians from the local to European level;
Amendment 464 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 f (new)
Paragraph 34 f (new)
34f. Emphasises the importance of projects such as fishing for litter campaigns and beach clean-ups;
Amendment 465 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 g (new)
Paragraph 34 g (new)
34g. Considering that abandoned, lost and otherwise discarded fishing gear accounts for at least 10 per cent of marine litter, calls for a better implementation of the compulsory reporting of lost fishing gear and measures to facilitate the collection, recycling and upcycling of fishing gear;
Amendment 483 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 a (new)
Paragraph 36 a (new)
36a. Given that a great portion of plastic waste in the ocean originates from countries in Asia and Africa, the issues of plastic pollution and waste management capacities should be a priority in the context of the EU's external policy framework ranging from EU development policy, sustainable fisheries partnership agreements, to ocean partnerships in the framework of an international ocean governance;
Amendment 13 #
2018/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas such unfair practices have to be cut out to avoid any misleading for consumers and considering that only a strong synergy at the EU level can solve this cross-border issue;
Amendment 27 #
2018/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the analyses show that certain products contain less meat, or less of other ingredients, in certain countries, in most cases those countries which joined the EU in 2004, 2007 and 2013; whereas the analyses found instances of the same products being sold at considerably higher prices in those countries than in the so- called ‘old Member States’, thus hindering the principle that all consumers are treated equally;
Amendment 44 #
2018/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 65 #
2018/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Firmly believes that, in response to European citizens’the sector's concerns about different products being sold under the same brand in different Member States, the practice of ‘one brand, one product, different content and proportional composition’ needis unacceptable and has to be stopped by means of an amendment to Directive 2005/29/EC of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices;
Amendment 76 #
2018/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. CIs of the opinion that manufacturers should be proactive by taking appropriate measures respecting the consumers and not wait for the new legislation to be put into place; considers that, until that practice is stopped, and in order to raise the profile of manufacturers’ initiatives on the use of local recipes, a system should be introduced for indicating, in a way that respects the consumer’s right of informed choice and consumer preferences, the local recipes used in the preparation of specific products;
Amendment 85 #
2018/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Manufacturers are invited to consider a logo on the packaging that would indicate that the content and the quality of the same brand and packaging product is the same across Member States;
Amendment 89 #
2018/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Welcomes the allocation of EUR 2 million to develop a methodology for, and conduct, comparative testing of food products in different Member States; expects the testing to be completed at the earliest possible date, preferably in 2018;
Amendment 102 #
2018/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the establishment of an agency or other specialised unit, within the existing bodies, to monitor consistency of composition and proportional use of ingredients in identically branded and packaged food products.
Amendment 17 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The enlargement policy of the Union is an investment in peace, security and, stability and prosperity in Europe. It provides increased economic and trade opportunities to the mutual benefit of the Union and the aspiring Member States. The prospect of Union membership has a powerful transformative effect, embedding positive democratic, political, economic and societal change.
Amendment 18 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The European Commission reaffirmed the firm, reform-based and merit-based prospect of EU membership for the Western Balkans in its Communication 'A credible enlargement perspective for and enhanced EU engagement with the Western Balkans'16. This is a strong message of encouragement for the whole Western Balkans and a sign of the EU’s commitment to their European future. __________________ 16 COM(2018) 65 final available at https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta- political/files/communication-credible- enlargement-perspective-western- balkans_en.pdf
Amendment 22 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Assistance should also be provided in compliance with the agreements concluded by the Union with the beneficiaries listed in Annex I. Assistance should mainly focus on assisting the beneficiaries listed in Annex I to strengthen democratic institutions and the rule of law, reform the judiciary and public administration, respect fundamental rights and promote gender equality, tolerance, minority rights, social inclusion and non- discrimination. Assistance should also support the key principles and rights as defined in the European Pillar of Social Rights17. Assistance should continue to support their efforts to advance regional, macro-regional and cross-border cooperation as well as territorial development, including through implementation of Union macro-regional strategies. It should also enhance their economic and social development and economic governance, underpinning a smart, sustainable and inclusive growth agenda, including through implementation of regional development, agriculture and rural development, social and employment policies and the development of the digital economy and society, also in line with the flagship initiative Digital Agenda for the Western Balkans. __________________ 17 European Pillar of Social Rights European Pillar of Social Rights solemnly proclaimed by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission at the Gothenburg Social Summit for Fair Jobs and Growth, Gothenburg 17 November 2017.
Amendment 27 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) It is essential to further step up cooperation on migration including border management, ensuring access to international protection, sharing relevant information, strengthening the development benefits of migration, facilitating legal and labour migration, enhancing border control, making humanitarian assistance available and pursuing our effort in the fight against irregular migration, trafficking in human beings and, migrant smuggling and other forms of crime.
Amendment 32 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) The beneficiaries listed in Annex I need to be better prepared to address global challenges, such as sustainable development, environmental protection and climate change, and align with the Union's efforts to address those issues. Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union's commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), this Programme should contribute to mainstream climate action in the Union's policies and to the achievement of an overall target of 25 % of the EU budget expenditures supporting climate objectives. Actions under this Programme are expected to contribute 16 % of the overall financial envelope of the Programme to climate objectives. Relevant actions will be identified during the Programme's preparation and implementation, and the overall contribution from this Programme should be part of relevant evaluations and review processes.
Amendment 33 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The Commission and the Member States should ensure compliance, coherence, and complementarity of their assistance, in particular through regular consultations and frequent exchanges of information during the different phases of the assistance cycle. The necessary steps should also be taken to ensure better coordination and complementarity, including through regular consultations, with other donors. The role of civil societyregional and local authorities, civil society and the private sector should be enhanced both in programmes implemented through government bodies and as a direct beneficiary of Union assistance.
Amendment 41 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) In order to maximise the impact of combined interventions to achieve a common objective, this Regulation should be able to contribute to actions under other EU programmes, as long as the contributions do not cover the same costs.
Amendment 42 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) The types of financing and the methods of implementation under this Regulation should be chosen on the basis of their ability to achieve the specific objectives of the actions and to deliver effective results, taking into account, in particular, the costs of controls, the administrative burden, and the expected risk of non- compliance. This should include consideration of the use of lump sums, flat rates and unit costs, as well as financing not linked to costs as referred to in Article 125(1) of the Financial Regulation.
Amendment 43 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) External actions are often implemented in a highly volatile environment requiring a continuous and rapid adaptation to the evolving needs of Union partners and to global challenges such as human rights, democracy and good governance, security and stability, climate change and environment, natural disasters, and irregular migration and its root causes. Reconciling the principle of predictability with the need to react rapidly to new needs consequently means adapting the financial implementation of the programmes. To increase the ability of the Union to respond to unforeseen needs, while respecting the principle that the Union budget is set annually, this Regulation should preserve the possibility to apply the flexibilities already allowed by the Financial Regulation for other policies, namely carry-overs and re-commitments of committed funds, to ensure an efficient use of the EU funds both for the EU citizens and the beneficiaries listed in Annex I, thus maximising the EU funds available for the EU external action interventions.
Amendment 46 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of IPA III shall be to support the beneficiaries listed in Annex I in adopting and implementing the political, institutional, legal, administrative, social and economic reforms required by those beneficiaries to comply with Union values and to progressively align to Union rules, standards, policies and practices with a view to Union membership, thereby contributing to their stability, security and prosperity, as well as to more rapid progress in the EU accession process.
Amendment 51 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) To reinforce the effectiveness of public administration and support structural reforms and good governance at all levels, from national to regional and local;
Amendment 55 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) To strengthen economic and social development including through increased connectivity and regional development, agriculture and rural development and social and employment policies, to reinforce environmental protection, increase resilience to climate change, accelerate the shift towards a low-carbon economy and, develop the digital economy and society, and create conditions for the development of entrepreneurship.
Amendment 57 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) To support territorial, interregional and cross- border cooperation.
Amendment 61 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The IPA programming framework shall take relevant EU macro-regional and national strategies and sector policies into due account.
Amendment 72 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point a
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) Establishing and promoting from an early stage the proper functioning of the institutions necessary in order to secure the rule of law. Interventions in this area shall aim at: establishing independent, accountable and efficient judicial systems, including transparent and merit-based recruitment and promoting judicial cooperation, evaluation and promotion systems and effective disciplinary procedures in cases of wrongdoing; ensuring the establishment of robust systems to protect the borders, manage migration flows and provide asylum to those in need; providing humanitarian assistance and developing effective tools to prevent and fight organised crime, trafficking in human beings, migrants smuggling, money laundering/financing of terrorism and corruption; promoting and protecting human rights, rights of persons belonging to minorities including Roma and other national minorities and social groups, as well as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex persons fundamental freedoms, including freedom of the media and data protection.
Amendment 73 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point b
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) Reforming public administrations at all levels, in line with the Principles of Public Administration. Interventions shall aim at: strengthening public administration reform frameworks; improving strategic planning and inclusive and evidence-based policy and legislative development; enhancing professionalisation and de- politicisation of public service by embedding meritocratic principles; promoting transparency and accountability; improving quality and delivery of services, including adequate administrative procedures and the use of citizen centred eGovernment; strengthening public financial management and the production of reliable statistics; strengthening decentralisation.
Amendment 74 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point c
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) Strengthening economic governance: Interventions shall aim at supporting participation in the economic reform programme (ERP) process and systematic cooperation with international financial institutions on fundamentals of economic policy. Enhancing the capacity to strengthen macroeconomic stability and supporting progress towards becoming a functioning market economy, including strengthening entrepreneurship, with the capacity to cope with competitive pressures and market forces within the Union;
Amendment 77 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point d
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) Strengthening the Union and its partners' capacity to prevent conflict, build peace and stability, and address pre-and post-crisis including through early warning and conflict-sensitive risk analysis; promoting people to people networking, reconciliation, peace-building and confidence-building measures, supporting capacity building in support of security and development (CBSD) actions.
Amendment 79 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point g
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) Strengthening access to and quality of education, training and lifelong learning at all levels, and offering support to digital, cultural and creative sectors. Interventions in this area shall aim at: promoting equal access to quality early-childhood education and care, primary and secondary education, improving the provision of basic skills; increasing educational attainment levels, reducing early school-leaving and reinforcing teachers’ training. Developing vocational education and training (VET) systems and promoting work-based learning systems to facilitate the transition to the labour market; improving the quality and relevance of higher education; encouraging alumni related activities; enhancing access to lifelong learning and supporting investment in education and training infrastructure particularly with a view to reducing territorial disparities and fostering non-segregated education and including through the use of digital technologies.
Amendment 80 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point h
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) Fostering quality employment and access to the labour market. Interventions in this area shall aim at: tackling high unemployment and inactivity by supporting sustainable labour market integration in particular of young people (especially those not in employment, education or training (NEET)), women, long-term unemployed and all under- represented groups. Measures shall stimulate quality job creation and support the effective enforcement of labour rules and standards across the entire territory. Other key areas of intervention shall be to support the promotion of entrepreneurship and self-employment, gender equality, promoting employability and productivity, the adaptation of workers and enterprises to change, the establishment of a sustainable social dialogue and the modernisation and strengthening of labour market institutions such as public employment services and labour inspectorates.
Amendment 81 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point i
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) Promoting social protection and inclusion and combating poverty. Interventions in this area shall aim at modernising social protection systems to provide effective, efficient, and adequate protection throughout all stages of a person’s life, fostering social inclusion, promoting equal opportunities and addressing inequalities and poverty. Interventions in this area shall also focus on: integrating marginalised communities such as the Roma; combating discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, nationality, language, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation; enhancing access to affordable, sustainable and high quality services, such as early childhood education and care, housing, healthcare and essential social services and long term care, including through the modernisation of social protection systems.
Amendment 82 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point j
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) Promoting smart, sustainable, inclusive, safe transport and removing bottlenecks in key network infrastructures, by investing in projects with high EU value-added. The investments should be prioritised according to their relevance to TEN-T connections with the EU, cross- border links, contribution to sustainable mobility, reduced emissions, environmental impact, safe mobility, in synergy with the reforms promoted by the Transport Community Treaty.
Amendment 83 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point k
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point k
(k) Improving the private-sector environment and competitiveness of enterprises and entrepreneurship, including smart specialisation, as key drivers of growth, job creation and cohesion. Priority shall be given to projects which improve the business environment.
Amendment 84 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point m
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point m
(m) Contributing to the security and safety of food and water supply and the maintenance of diversified and viable farming systems in vibrant rural communities and the countryside.
Amendment 19 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In its Communication ‘A European Solidarity Corps’ of 7 December 201618, the Commission emphasised the need to strengthen the foundations for solidarity work across Europe, to provide young people with more and better opportunities for solidarity activities covering a broad range of areas, and to support national and local actors, in their efforts to cope with different challenges and crises. The Communication launched a first phase of the European Solidarity Corps whereby different Union programmes were mobilised to offer volunteering, traineeship or job opportunities to young people across the UnDoes not affect the English version.)
Amendment 24 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) Young people should be provided with easily accessible opportunities to engage in solidarity activities, which could enable them to express their commitment to the benefit of communities while acquiring useful experience, knowledge, skills and competences for their personal, educational, social, civic and professional development, thereby improving their employability. Those activities should also support the mobility of young volunteers, trainees and workers.
Amendment 25 #
2018/0230(COD)
(6) The solidarity activities offered to young people should be of high quality, in the sense that they should respond to unmet societal needs, contribute to strengthening communities, offer young people the opportunity to acquire valuable skills, knowledge and competences, be financially accessible to young people, and be implemented in safe and healthy conditions.
Amendment 30 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) The European Solidarity Corps provides a single entry point for solidarity activities throughout the Union and beyond. Consistency and complementarity should be ensured with other relevant Union policies and programmes. The European Solidarity Corps is built on the strengths and synergies of predecessor and existing programmes, notably the European Voluntary Service19 and the EU Aid Volunteers20. It also complements the efforts made by Member States, regions and cities to support young people and ease their school-to- work transition under the Youth Guarantee by providing them with additional opportunities to make a start on the labour market in the form of traineeships or jobs in solidarity-related areas within their respective Member State or across borders. Complementarity with existing Union level networks pertinent to the activities under the European Solidarity Corps, such as the European Network of Public Employment Services, EURES and the Eurodesk network, are also ensured. Furthermore, complementarity between existing related schemes, in particular national solidarity schemes and mobility schemes for young people, and the European Solidarity Corps should be ensured, building on good practices where appropriate. _________________ 19 Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing '‘Erasmus+'’: the Union programme for education, training, youth and sport and repealing Decisions No 1719/2006/EC, No 1720/2006/EC and No 1298/2008/EC (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 50–73). 20 Regulation (EU) No 375/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 establishing the European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps (‘EU Aid Volunteers initiative’) (OJ L 122, 24.4.2014, p. 1-17).
Amendment 32 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) The European Solidarity Corps opens up new opportunities for young people to carry out volunteering, traineeship or job activities in solidarity- related areas as well as to devise and develop solidarity programmes and projects based on their own initiative. These opportunities contribute to enhancing their personal, educational, social, civic and professional development. The European Solidarity Corps also supports networking activities for European Solidarity Corps participants and organisations as well as measures to ensure the quality of the supported activities and to enhance the validation of their learning outcomes. It will thus also contribute to European cooperation relevant to young people and raising awareness of its positive impact.
Amendment 61 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) Appropriate outreach, publicity and dissemination of the opportunities and results of the actions supported by the Programme should be ensured at European, national, regional and local level. Special attention should be paid to social enterprises encouraging them to support the European Solidarity Corps activities. The outreach, publicity and dissemination activities should rely on all the implementing bodies of the Programme, including, when relevant, with the support of other key stakeholders.
Amendment 65 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
Recital 47
(47) In accordance with the Financial Regulation, Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2988/9534, Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 and Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, the financial interests of the Union are to be protected through proportionate measures, including the prevention, detection, correction and investigation of irregularities, including fraud, the recovery of funds lost, wrongly paid or incorrectly used and, where appropriate, the imposition of administrative sanctions. In order to review and/or complement the performance indicators of the implementation of the Programme, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council should receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. _________________ 34 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests (OJ L 312, 23.12.95, p. 1).
Amendment 91 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The specific objective of the Programme is to provide young people, including those with fewer opportunities, with easily accessible opportunities for engagement in solidarity activities in Europe and abroad while improving and properly validating their knowledge and competences as well as facilitating their employability and transition into the labour market.
Amendment 30 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) With 1.8% of EU GDP, down from 2.2% in 2009, infrastructure investment activities in the Union in 2016 were about 20% below investment rates before the global financial crisis. Thus, while a recovery in investment-to-GDP ratios in the Union can be observed, it remains below what might be expected in a strong recovery period and is insufficient to compensate years of underinvestment. More importantly, the current investment levels and forecasts do not cover the Union’s structural investment needs in the face of technological change and global competitiveness, including for innovation, skills, infrastructure, small and medium- sized enterprises (‘SMEs’) and the need to address key societal challenges such as sustainability or population ageing. Consequently, continued support is necessary to address market failures and sub-optimal investment situations to reduce the investment gap in targeted sectors to reduce disparities in the level of development and to achieve the Union’s policy objectives.
Amendment 99 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) In order to ensure a wide geographic outreach of the advisory services across the Union and to successfully leverage local knowledge about the InvestEU Fund, a regional and local presence of the InvestEU Advisory Hub should be ensured, where needed, taking into account existing support schemes, with a view to provide tangible, proactive, tailor-made assistance on the ground.
Amendment 106 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
Recital 47
(47) The InvestEU Programme should address EU-wide market failures and, sub- optimal investment situations, disparities in the level of development and provide for Union-wide market testing of innovative financial products, and systems to spread them, for new or complex market failures. Therefore, action at Union level is warranted,
Amendment 117 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) balanced development and the reduction of disparities;
Amendment 128 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
An additional amount of the EU guarantee may be provided for the purposes of the Member State compartment referred to in point (b) of Article 8(1), subject to the allocation by Member States, pursuant to [Article 10(1)] of Regulation [[CPR] number]28 and Article [75(1)] of Regulation [[CAP plan] number]29, of the corresponding amounts. _________________ 28 null 29 nullMember States may allocate, pursuant to Regulation CPR and Regulation CAP, an amount of ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund, EARDF and the EMFF to contribute to InvestEU and be delivered through budgetary guarantees. The amount to be contributed to InvestEU shall not exceed 6 % of the total allocation of each Fund, except in duly justified cases.
Amendment 132 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Financing and investment operations covered by the EU guarantee under the Member State Compartment which form part of blending operation combining support under this Regulation with support provided under one or more other Union programmes can be implemented under shared management.
Amendment 141 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) sustainable infrastructure policy window: comprises sustainable investment in the areas of transport, energy, communication and digital connectivity, supply and processing of raw materials, space, oceans and water, waste, nature and other environment infrastructure, equipment, mobile assets and deployment of innovative technologies that contribute to the environmental or social sustainability objectives of the Union, or to both, or meet the environmental or social sustainability standards of the Union;
Amendment 147 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) research, innovation and digitisation policy window: comprises research and innovation activities, transfer of research results to the market, demonstration and deployment of innovative solutions and support to scaling up of innovative companies other than SMEs as well as digitisation of Union industry;
Amendment 182 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) cross-border and interregional projects between entities located or established in one or more Member States and extending to one or more third countries, including acceding countries, candidate countries and potential candidates, countries covered by the European Neighbourhood Policy, the European Economic Area or the European Free Trade Association, or to an overseas country or territory as set out in Annex II to the TFEU, or to an associated third country, whether or not there is a partner in those third countries or overseas countries or territories;
Amendment 191 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) achieves geographical diversification in relation to the need for balanced development;
Amendment 212 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
The composition of the Investment Committee shall ensure that it has a wide knowledge of the sectors covered by the policy windows referred to in Article 7(1) and of the geographic markets in the Union and that it is geographical and gender- balanced as a whole.
Amendment 216 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
When participating in the activities of the Investment Committee, its members shall perform their duties impartially and in the sole interest of the InvestEU Fund. They shall not seek or take instructions from the implementing partners, the institutions of the Union, the Member States, the regions or any other public or private body.
Amendment 234 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. The implementing partners shall acknowledge the origin and ensure the visibility of the Union funding (in particular when promoting the actions and their results), by providing coherent, effective and targeted information to multiple audiences, including the media and the public, according to the standards applicable to EU programs.
Amendment 11 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) In order to achieve smart, sustainable, balanced and inclusive growth and to stimulate jobthe creation of new jobs, the Union needs an up-to-date, high- performance infrastructure to help connect and integrate the Union and all its regions, in the transport, telecommunications and energy sectors. Those connections should help to improve the free movement of persons, goods, capital and services. The trans-European networks should facilitate cross-border connections, foster greater economic, social and territorial cohesion and contribute to a more competitive social market economy and to combating climate change.
Amendment 14 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The Programme should aim at supporting climate change, environmentally and soci, socially, and economically sustainable projects and, where appropriate, climate change mitigation and adaptation actions. In particular, the contribution of the Programme to achieving the goals and objectives of the Paris Agreement as well as the proposed 2030 climate and energy targets and long-term decarbonisation objective should be reinforced.
Amendment 16 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implementing the Paris Agreement, and the commitment to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this Regulation should therefore mainstream climate action and lead to the achievement of an overall target of 25% of the EU budget expenditures supporting climate objectives18. Actions under this Programme are expected to contribute 60% of the overall financial envelope of the Programme to climate objectives, based inter alia on the following Rio markers: i. 100% for the expenditures relating to railway infrastructure, alternative fuels, clean urban transport, electricity transmission, electricity storage, smart grids, CO2 transportation and renewable energy; 40% for inland waterways and multimodal transport, and gas infrastructure – if enabling increased use of renewable hydrogen or bio-methane. Relevant actions will be identified during the Programmeʼ's preparation and implementation, and reassessed in the context of the relevant evaluations and review processes. In order to prevent that infrastructure is vulnerable to potential long -term climate change impacts and to ensure that the cost of greenhouse gas emissions arising from the project is included in the projectʼ’s economic evaluation, projects supported by the Programme should be subject to long- term climate proofing in accordance with guidance that should be developed by the Commission coherin a manner consistently with the guidance developed for other programmes of the Union where relevant. _________________ 18 COM(2018) 321, page 13 COM(2018) 321, page 13
Amendment 21 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) An important objective of this Programme is to deliver increased synergies between the transport, energy and digital sectors. For that purpose, the Programme should provide for the adoption of cross-sectoral work programmes that could address specific intervention areas, for instance as regards connected and automated mobility or alternative fuels. In addition, the Programme should allow, within each sector mentioned above, the possibility tof considering eligible some ancillary components pertaining to another sector, where such an approach improves the socio-economic benefit of the investment. Synergies between the above-mentioned sectors should be incentivized through the award criteria for the selection of actions.
Amendment 26 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) In order to achieve the objectives laid down in the TEN-T guidelines, it is necessary to support with priority the cross-border links and, the missing links, and transport bottlenecks and to ensure, where applicable, that the supported actions are consistent with the corridor work plans established pursuant to Article 47 of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 and to the overall network development regarding performance and interoperability.
Amendment 29 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In order to reflect growing transport flows and the evolution of the network, the alignment of the core network corridors and their pre-identified sections should be adapted. These adaptations should be proportionate in order to preserve the balance, the consistency, and the efficiency of the corridor development and coordination. For that reason the length of the core network corridors should not increase by more than 15%.
Amendment 31 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) It is necessary to promote investments in favour of smart, balanced, sustainable, inclusive, safe and secure mobility throughout the Union. In 2017, the Commission presented20 “Europe on the move”, a wide-ranging set of initiatives to make traffic safer, encourage smart road charging, reduce CO2 emissions, air pollution and congestion, promote connected and autonomous mobility and ensure proper conditions and rest times for workers. These initiatives should be accompanied by Union financial support, where relevant through this Programme. _________________ 20 Commission Communication “Europe on the move: An agenda for a socially fair transition towards clean, competitive and connected mobility for all” – COM(2017) 283
Amendment 39 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) In order to improve the completion of transport projects in less developed parts of the network, a Cohesion Fund allocation should be transferred to the Programme to finance transport projects in the Member States eligible for financing from the Cohesion Fund. In an initial phase and within a limit of 70% of the transferred envelope, the selection of projects eligible for financing should respect the national allocations under the Cohesion Fund. The remaining 30% of the transferred envelope should be allocated on a competitive basis to projects located in the Member States eligible for financing from the Cohesion Fund with priority tofor cross-border links, tackling transport bottlenecks, and missing links. The Commission should support Member States eligible for financing from the Cohesion Fund in their efforts to develop an appropriate pipeline of projects, in particular by strengthening the institutional capacity of the public administrations concerned.
Amendment 52 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) The achievement of the digital single market relies on the underlying digital connectivity infrastructure. The digitalisation of European industry and the modernisation of sectors like transport, energy, healthcare and public administration depend on universal access to reliable, affordable, high and very high capacity networks. Digital connectivity has become one of the decisive factors to close economic, social and territorial divides, supporting the modernisation of local and regional economies and underpinning the diversification of economic activities. The scope of intervention of the Programme in the area of digital connectivity infrastructure should be adjusted to reflect its increasing importance for the economy and the society at large. Therefore, it is necessary to set out the digital connectivity infrastructure projects of common interest needed to meet the Unionʼs digital single market objectives, and to repeal Regulation (EU) No 283/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council29 . _________________ 29 Regulation (EU) No 283/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2014 on guidelines for trans- European networks in the area of telecommunications infrastructure and repealing Decision No 1336/97/EC (OJ L 86, 21.3.2014, p. 14).
Amendment 58 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Unconnected territories in all areas of the Union, including in central ones, represent bottlenecks and unexploited potential to the digital single market. In most rural and remote areas, high -quality Internet connectivity can play an essential role in preventing a digital divide, isolation and depopulationmographic problems, and in stimulating the economy, by reducing the costs of delivery of both goods and services and partially compensating for remoteness. High -quality Internet connectivity is necessary for new economic opportunities such as precision farming or the development of a bio-economy in rural areas. The Programme should contribute to providing all European households, rural or urban, with very high capacity fixed or wireless connectivity, focusing on those deployments for which a degree of market failure is observed and which can be addressed using low -intensity grants. In doing so, the Programme should aim at achieving a comprehensive coverage of households and territories, as gaps in an already covered area are uneconomic to address at a later stage.
Amendment 62 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) The deployment of backbone electronic communications networks, including with submarine cables connecting European territories to third countries on other continents or connecting European islands or overseas territories to the mainland, is needed in order to provide necessary redundancy for such vital infrastructure, and to increase the capacity and resilience of the Unionʼs digital networks. However, such projects are often financially unprofitable and commercially non-viable without public support.
Amendment 70 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
Recital 42
(42) The Union should seekachieve coherence and synergies with the Union programmes for external policies, including pre- accession assistance following the engagements takenentered into in the context of the Communication “A credible enlargement perspective for and enhanced EU engagement with the Western Balkans”38. _________________ 38 COM(2018) 65, page 13 COM(2018) 65, page 13
Amendment 71 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
Recital 43
(43) When third countries or entities established in third countries participate in actions contributing to projects of common interest or to cross-border projects in the field of renewable energy, financial assistance should only be available if it is indispensable to the achievement of the objectives of these projects. Clear criteria should be laid down for such projects.
Amendment 78 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The Programme has the general objective tof developing and moderniseing the trans-European networks in the fields of transport, energy and digital and to facilitatetechnology and of bringing about cross-border cooperation in the field of renewable energy, taking into account the long-term decarbonisation commitments and with emphasis on synergies among sectors.
Amendment 81 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i
(i) to contribute to the development of projects of common social and economic interest relating to efficient and interconnected networks and infrastructure for smart, sustainable, inclusive, safe and secure mobility;
Amendment 88 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) In the energy sector, to contribute to the development of projects of common social and economic interest relating to further integration of the internal energy market, interoperability of networks across borders and sectors, facilitating decarbonisation and ensuring security of supply, and to facilitate cross- border cooperation in the area of renewable energy;
Amendment 89 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) In the digital sector, to contribute to the development of projects of common social and economic interest that contribute to the deployment of very high capacity digital networks and 5G systems, to the increased resilience and capacity of digital backbone networks on EU territories by linking them to neighbouring territories, as well to the digitalisation of transport and energy networks.
Amendment 92 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part
(a) up to EUR 30,615,493,000 for the specific objectives referred to in Article 3(2)(a), of which:
Amendment 98 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) up to EUR 8,650,000,000 for the specific objectives referred to in Article 3(2)(b), out of which up to 10% for the cross-border projects in the field of renewable energy
Amendment 100 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) up to EUR 3,000,000,000 for the specific objectives referred to in Article 3(2)(c).
Amendment 111 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 8
Article 4 – paragraph 8
8. As regards the amounts transferred from the Cohesion Fund, 30% of these amounts shall be made available immediately to all Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund to finance transport infrastructure projects in accordance with this Regulation, with priority tofor cross-border links, transport bottlenecks, and missing links. Until 31 December 2023, the selection of projects eligible for financing shall respect the national allocations under the Cohesion Fund with regard to 70% of the resources transferred. As of 1 January 2024, resources transferred to the Programme which have not been committed to a transport infrastructure project shall be made available to all Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund to finance transport infrastructure projects in accordance with this Regulation.
Amendment 119 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 9
Article 4 – paragraph 9
9. Resources allocated to Member States under shared management may, at their request, be transferred to the Programme. The Commission shall implement those resources directly in accordance with [point (a) of Article 62(1)] of the Financial Regulation or indirectly in accordance with point (c) of that Article. Where possible those resources shall be used primarily for the benefit of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 133 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii
(ii) actions implementing cross-border links of the comprehensive network in accordance with Chapter II of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013, notably the sections listed in Part III of the Annex to this Regulation, and sections providing a solution to cross-border transport bottlenecks;
Amendment 147 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) actions whereby the digital sector can support social and economic development in remote regions, mountain and island regions, and other regions which economically and demographically are lagging behind;
Amendment 155 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) cross-border dimension and contribution towards balance in regional development;
Amendment 156 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) contribution to greater integration of the Union;
Amendment 157 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point i
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) consistency with Union and national and regional energy and climate plans.
Amendment 169 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) for works relating to the specific objectives referred to in Article 3(2)(a), the amount of Union financial assistance shall not exceed 30% of the total eligible cost. The co-financing rates may be increased to a maximum of 50% for actions relating to cross-border links under the conditions specified in point (c) of this paragraph, for actions supporting telematic applications systems, for actions supporting new technologies and innovation, for actions supporting improvements of infrastructure safety in line with relevant Union legislation and for actions located in outermost regions;
Amendment 172 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. For works in the digital sector, the following maximum co-financing rates shall apply: for works relating to the specific objectives referred to in Article 3(2)(c), the amount of Union financial assistance shall not exceed 30% of the total eligible cost. The co-financing rates may be increased up to 50% for actions with a strong cross-border dimension, such as uninterrupted coverage with 5G systems along major transport paths or deployment of backbone networks between Member States and between the Union and third countries, and up to 75% for actions implementing the Gigabit connectivity of socio-economic drivers. Actions in the field of providing local wireless connectivity in local communities shall be funded by Union financial assistance covering up to 100% of the eligible costs, without prejudice to the principle of co- financing.
Amendment 188 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. The recipients of Union funding shall acknowledge the origin and ensure the visibility of the Union funding (in particular when promoting the actions and their results), by providing coherent, effective and proportionate targeted information, in accordance with the rules laid down for Union funds, to multiple audiences, including the media and the public.
Amendment 81 #
2018/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The pillar 'Global Challenges and Industrial Competitiveness' should be established through clusters of research and innovation activities, in order to maximise integration across the respective work areas while securing high and sustainable levels of impact in relation to the resources that are expended. It will encourage cross- disciplinary, cross-sectoral, cross-policy and, cross-border and cross-regional collaboration in pursuit of the UN SDGs and the competitiveness of the Union's industries therein.
Amendment 86 #
2018/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) It is important to support industry to stay or become world leader in innovation, digitisation and decarbonisation, notably through investments in key enabling technologies that will underpin tomorrow's business. The Programme's actions should support technological development necessary to maintain industry on an increasingly competitive global market and be used to address market failures or sub-optimal investment situations, in a proportionate manner, without duplicating or crowding out private financing and have a clear European added value. This will ensure consistency between the actions of the programme and EU State aid rules, avoiding undue distortions of competition in the internal market.
Amendment 94 #
2018/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) The Programme should seek synergies with other Union programmes, especially ESI Funds, from their design and strategic planning, to project selection, management, communication, dissemination and exploitation of results, to monitoring, auditing and governance. With a view to avoiding overlaps and duplication and increasing the leverage of Union funding, transfers from other Union programmes to Horizon Europe activities can take place. In such cases they will follow Horizon Europe rules;
Amendment 100 #
2018/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) In order to achieve the greatest possible impact of Union funding and the most effective contribution to the Union's policy objectives, the Programme should enter into European Partnerships with private and/or public sector partners. Such partners include industry, research organisations, bodies with a public service mission at local, regional, national or international level, and both national and international civil society organisations such as foundations that support and/or carry out research and innovation, provided that desired impacts can be achieved more effectively in partnership than by the Union alone.
Amendment 115 #
2018/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) The Programme should promote and integrate cooperation with third countries and international organisations and initiatives based on common interest, mutual benefit and global commitments to implement the UN SDGs. International cooperation should aim to strengthen the Union's research and innovation excellence, attractiveness and economic and industrial competitiveness, to tackle global challenges, as embodied in the UN SDGs, and to support the Union's external policies. An approach of general opening for international participation and targeted international cooperation actions should be followed, including through appropriate eligibility for funding of entities established in low to middle income countries. At the same time, association of third countries to the Programme should be promoted. In line with the possibilities, a synergy with other programmes implemented by the EU with third countries and international organisations should be established.
Amendment 119 #
2018/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) With the aim of deepening the relationship between science and society and maximising benefits of their interactions, the Programme should engage and involve citizens and civil society organisations in a partnership whose aim is co-designing and co- creating responsible research and innovation agendas and contents, promoting science education, making scientific knowledge publicly accessible, and facilitating participation by citizens and civil society organisations in its activities. It should do so across the Programme and through dedicated activities in the part 'Strengthening the European Research Area'. The engagement of citizens and civil society organisations in research and innovation should be coupled with public outreach activities to generate and sustain public support for the Programme. The programme should also seek to remove barriers and boost synergies between science, technology, culture and the arts to obtain a new quality of sustainable innovation.
Amendment 165 #
2018/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) to support the creation and, diffusion and adoption of high-quality new knowledge, skills, technologies and solutions to global challenges;
Amendment 243 #
2018/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point d – paragraph 1 – point ii
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point d – paragraph 1 – point ii
(ii) commitment to a rules-based and rule of law-based open market economy, including fair and equitable dealing with intellectual property rights, backed by democratic institutions;
Amendment 275 #
2018/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 4
Article 39 – paragraph 4
4. The work programme or rules of contest mayshould include obligations regarding communication, exploitation and dissemination.
Amendment 289 #
2018/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 1
Article 46 – paragraph 1
1. The recipients of Union funding shall acknowledge the origin and ensure the visibility of the Union funding (in particular when promoting the actions and their results) by providing clear, coherent, effective and proportionate targeted information to multiple audiences, including the media and the public.
Amendment 146 #
2018/0218(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
Amendment 410 #
2018/0218(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Amendment 684 #
2018/0218(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 a (new)
Article 2 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Amendment 686 #
2018/0218(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
Article 2 – paragraph 2
Article 2 – paragraph 2
Amendment 687 #
2018/0218(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory sentence
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory sentence
(2a) In Article 5, paragraph 1, the introductory sentence is replaced by the following: 1. For the purpose of this Regulation, ‘designation of origin’ is a name traditionally used in a specific place which identifies a product:
Amendment 692 #
2018/0218(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Amendment 697 #
2018/0218(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
(3b) Article 7 - paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: “1. A protected designation of origin or a protected geographical indication shall comply with a specification which shall include at least:(a) the name to be protected as a designation of origin or geographical indication, as it is used, whether in trade or in common language, and only in the languages which are or were historically used to describe the specific product in the defined geographical area;(b) a description of the product, including the raw materials, if appropriate, as well as the principal physical, chemical, microbiological or organoleptic characteristics of the product;(c) the definition of the geographical area delimited with regard to the link referred to in point (f)(i) or (ii) of this paragraph, and, where appropriate, details indicating compliance with the requirements of Article 5(3);(d) evidence that the product originates in the defined geographical area referred to in Article 5(1) or (2);(e) a description of the method of obtaining the product and, where appropriate, the contribution to sustainable development, the authentic and unvarying local methods as well as information concerning packaging, if the applicant group so determines and gives sufficient product-specific justification as to why the packaging must take place in the defined geographical area to safeguard quality, to ensure the origin or to ensure control, taking into account Union law, in particular that on the free movement of goods and the free provision of services;(f) details establishing the following:(i) the link between the quality or characteristics of the product and the geographical environment referred to in Article 5(1); or(ii) where appropriate, the link between a given quality, the reputation or other characteristic of the product and the geographical origin referred to in Article 5(2);(g) the name and address of the authorities or, if available, the name and address of bodies verifying compliance with the provisions of the product specification pursuant to Article 37 and their specific tasks;(h) any specific labelling rule for the product in question. ” Or. en (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:02012R1151- 20130103&qid=1544449512758&from=EN)
Amendment 711 #
2018/0218(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
(5a) In Article 13, paragraph 1, the point a is replaced by the following: (a) any direct or indirect commercial use of a registered name in respect of products not covered by the registration where those products are comparable to the products registered under that name or where using the name exploits, weakens or dilutes, the reputation of the protected name, including when those products are used as an ingredient;
Amendment 713 #
2018/0218(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
Article 13 – point 1 – point d a (new)
Article 13 – point 1 – point d a (new)
(5b) In Article 13, paragraph 1, the following point is inserted: (da) any registration, in bad faith, of a domain name that is similar or liable to cause confusion, in full or in part, with a protected name.
Amendment 739 #
2018/0218(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
Article 53 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 53 – paragraph 3 a (new)
(14a) 4. The Commission shall adopt guidelines setting out criteria and a common methodology for the implementation and enforcement of the administrative process of Union and standard amendments to product specifications, in order to assure coherence in the implementation of standard amendments at national level. Within 3 year of entry into force of the reform, the Commission shall carry out a first evaluation of the effectiveness of the administrative process of Union and standard amendments to product specification, in order to assess the impact and coherence of the reform implementation at national level. Following the evaluation, the Commission shall present a report of the main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 738 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30 a (new)
Recital 30 a (new)
(30 a) Organic farming is developing in many European countries and has a proven track record of delivering public goods, preserving ecosystems services and natural resources, reducing inputs, attracting young farmers and women in particular,creating jobs, experimenting new business models, meeting societal demands, and revitalising rural areas. Yet the growth in the demand for organic products continues to outpace the growth in production. Member States should ensure that their CAP Strategic Plans include objectives to increase the share of agricultural land under organic management in order to meet the increasing demand for organic products, and to develop the whole organic supply chain. Member States may fund organic conversion and maintenance either through rural development measures or through eco-schemes, or through a combination of both, and should ensure that allocated budgets match the expected growth in organic production.
Amendment 765 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) Member States should be allowed to use part of their financial ceiling available for direct payments for coupled income support in order to improve competitiveness, sustainability, and/or quality in certain sectors and productions, especially livestock sector and special crop production, that are particularly important for social, economic or environmental reasons and undergo certain difficulties, and where other tools are not sufficient enough or don't exist. Member States should be free to identify the sectors that should benefits from this. Furthermore, Member States should also be allowed to use an additional part of their financial ceiling available for direct payments to grant coupled income support specifically for the support of protein crop production in order to reduce the Union's deficit in this regard.
Amendment 820 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
Recital 40
(40) In order to ensure a fair income and a resilient agricultural sector across the Union territory, Member States may grant support to farmers in areas facing natural and other area-specific constraints. As regards payments for ANC, the designation of the 2014-2020 Rural Development policy should continue to apply. For the CAP to deliver enhanced Union added on the environment and reinforce its synergies with the financing of investments in nature and biodiversity, it is necessary to keep a separate measure aiming at compensating beneficiaries for disadvantages related to the implementation of Natura 2000 and Water Framework Directives. Support should therefore continue to be granted to farmers and forest holders to help address specific disadvantages resulting from the implementation of Directive 2009/147/EC and Directive 92/43/EEC and in order to contribute to the effective management of Natura 2000 sites. Support should also be made available to farmers to help address disadvantages in river basin areas resulting from the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. Support should be linked to specific requirements described in the CAP Strategic Plans that go beyond relevant mandatory standards and requirements. Member States should also ensure that payments to farmers do not lead to double funding with eco schemes, while at the same allowing enough flexibility in Strategic Plans to facilitate complementarity between different interventions. . Furthermore, the specific needs of Natura 2000 areas should be taken into account by Member States in the overall design of their CAP Strategic Plans.
Amendment 882 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
Recital 45
(45) Support should enable the establishment and implementation of cooperation between at least two entities in view of achieving CAP objectives. Support can entail all aspects of such cooperation, such as the setting up, certification costs and promotion of quality schemes; collective environmental and climate action; the promotion of short supply chain and local markets; pilot projects; Operational Group projects within the EIP for agricultural productivity and sustainability local development projects, Smart Villages, buyers' clubs and machinery rings; farm partnerships; forest management plans; networks and clusters; social farming; community supported agriculture; actions within the scope of LEADER; and the setting up of producer groups and producer organisations, including producer groups recognised under Regulation (EU) No 1151/12, as well as other forms of cooperation deemed necessary to achieve the specific objectives of the CAP.
Amendment 975 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 56
Recital 56
(56) In the process of development of their CAP Strategic Plans, Member States should analyse their specific situation and needs, set programme targets linked to the achievement of the objectives of the CAP and design the interventions which will allow reaching these targets, while being adapted to the national and specific regional contexts, including the outermost regions pursuant to Article 349 TFEU. Such process should promote more subsidiarity within a common Union framework, while compliance with the general principles of Union law and the objectives of the CAP should be ensured and while the commonality of the policy is secured. It is therefore appropriate to set rules on the structure and content of the CAP Strategic Plans.
Amendment 1401 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) foster sustainable development and efficientthe adequate management of natural resources such as water, soil and air, giving priority to farming systems that deliver multiple benefits such as enhanced management of permanent pastures, landscape features, and organic farming;
Amendment 1440 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) attract young farmers and women and facilitate business development in rural areas;
Amendment 1459 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) promote employment, gender equality, growth, social inclusion and local development in rural areas, including bio- economy and sustainable forestry;
Amendment 1479 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) improve the response of EU agriculture to societal demands on food and health, including organic farming, safe, nutritious and sustainable food, food waste, as well as animal welfare.
Amendment 1539 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 138 amending Annex I to adapt the common output, result and impact indicators to take into account the experience with their application and, where needed, to add new indicators. The Commission shall make a full assessment on the effectiveness of the output, result and impact indicators in annex I, as well as presenting concrete solutions to strengthen the results-based approach of the policy. The reports hall be part of the impact assessment and the proposals for the Common Agricultural Policy programming that is expected to start in 2028.
Amendment 1577 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Those interventions shall also respect the provisions of the additional paragraph of Annex 2 to the WTO Agreement on Agriculture as set out in Annex II to this Regulation. Interventions belonging to types of interventions other than the basic income support for sustainability, the complementary redistributive income support for sustainability, the complementary income support for young farmers and, the schemes for the climate and the environment and environmental, climate and other management commitments under rural development may instead respect a different paragraph of Annex 2 to the WTO Agreement on Agriculture if that is justified in the CAP Strategic Plan.
Amendment 1760 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point f a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point f a (new)
(f a) equal rights and opportunities for all farmers and beneficiaries, including the promotion of equality between men and women in farming.
Amendment 1796 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Title 3 – chapter 1 – section 3 a (new)
Title 3 – chapter 1 – section 3 a (new)
Section 3a Organic Farming Article 13a Organic Farming Organic agriculture, as defined under Regulation2018/848, is a certified farming system that can contribute towards multiple CAP specific objectives as laid out in article 6.1 of this Regulation. In view of the benefits of organic farming as well as its growing demand which continues to outpace the increase of production, Member States shall assess the level of support needed for agricultural land managed under the organic certification. Member States shall include in their CAP Strategic Plans an analysis of the organic sector’s production, of the expected demand, and of its potential to fulfil CAP objectives, and shall set up objectives to increase the share of agricultural land under organic management as well as to develop the whole organic supply chain. Based on this assessment, Member States shall determine the appropriate level of support towards organic conversion and maintenance either through rural development measures in article65 or through eco-schemes in article 28, or through a combination of both, and should ensure that allocated budgets match the expected growth in organic production.
Amendment 1978 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. The schemes for the climate and the environment shall not be considered as direct payments under this specific article concerning reduction of payments.
Amendment 2204 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shallmay ensure redistribution of support from bigger to smaller or medium-sized farmfarms on a larger financial scale to smaller ones by providing for a redistributive income support in the form of an annual decoupled payment per eligible hectare to farmers who are entitled to a payment under the basic income support referred to in Article 17.
Amendment 2329 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
Article 28 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall establish the list of agricultural practices and farming systems beneficial for the climate and the environment. When drafting their CAP Strategic Plans Member States should prioritise farming systems which deliver multiple benefits in an effective way for the achievement of objectives (d), (e), (f) and (i) of Article 6.1, such as the enhanced management of permanent pastures, landscape features, and organic farming.
Amendment 2361 #
2018/0216(COD)
4. Those practices shall be designed to meet one or more of the specific environmental- and climate-related objectives laid down in points (d), (e) and (f), and the socio-economic objective in point (i) of Article 6(1).
Amendment 2375 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 28 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Eco-schemes should be tailored to address specific regional needs for the environment and climate that can be identified in the CAP Strategic Plans.
Amendment 3179 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) implementation and control of Union and national quality schemes;
Amendment 3207 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 1
Article 61 – paragraph 1
1. In each sector concerned, the objectives and the interventions set out by the Member States in their CAP Strategic Plans shall be implemented through approved operational programs of producer organisations and/or associations of producer organisations recognised under Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, and producer groups recognised under Regulation (EU) No 1151/12, under the conditions laid down in this Article.
Amendment 3215 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 4
Article 61 – paragraph 4
4. Operational programs shall be submitted by producer organisations and/or associations of producer organisations recognised under Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 and producer groups recognised under Regulation (EU) No 1151/12 to the Member States for their approval.
Amendment 3221 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 5
Article 61 – paragraph 5
5. Operational programs may be implemented only by producer organisations or by associations of producer organisations recognised under Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 and producer groups recognised under Regulation (EU) No 1151/12.
Amendment 3289 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 64 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
Article 64 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
(ha) thematic sub-programme for quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs.
Amendment 3343 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 5 – point b
Article 65 – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) go beyond the minimumrelevant requirements for the use of fertiliser and plant protection products, animal welfare, as well as other mandatoryrelevant requirements established by national and Union law;
Amendment 3422 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 10
Article 65 – paragraph 10
10. Member States shall ensure that persons carrying out operations under this type of interventions have access to the knowledge and information required to implement such operations, and is relevant according to the analysis of needs.
Amendment 3768 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 1
Article 71 – paragraph 1
1. Member States may grant support for cooperation under the conditions set out in this Article and as further specified in their CAP Strategic Plans to prepare and to implement Operational Group projects of the European Innovation Partnership for agricultural productivity and sustainability as referred to in Article 114 and LEADER, referred to as community-led local development in Article 25 of Regulation (EU) [CPR], and to promote quality schemes, producer organisations or producer groups, including producer groups recognised under Regulation (EU) No 1151/12, or other forms of cooperation.
Amendment 3777 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 3
Article 71 – paragraph 3
3. Member States may cover under this type of interventions the costs related to all necessary aspects of the cooperation, including certification costs relating to participation in an EU quality scheme. .
Amendment 3825 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 a (new)
Article 72 a (new)
Article 72 a Thematic sub-programme for quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs Member States may establish a thematic subprogramme for quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs within their strategic plans. This subprogramme shall meet the objectives referred to in Article 6(1).
Amendment 4242 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 92 – paragraph 1
Article 92 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall aim to make, through their CAP Strategic Plans and in particular through the elements of the intervention strategy referred to in point (a) of Article 97(2), a greater overall contribution to the achievement of the specific environmental- and climate-related objectives set out in points (d), (e) and (f) of Article 6(1) in comparison to the overall contribution made to the achievement of the objective laid down in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 110(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 through support under the EAGF and the EAFRD in the period 2014 to 2020. Payments towards organic conversion and maintenance in CAP Strategic Plans under Articles 28 and 65 of this Regulation shall exceed the total payments made before 2021 under Rural Development to organic farmers, calculated as a yearly average using constant prices.
Amendment 4427 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 103 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 103 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The SWOT analysis shall be based on the current situation of the area covered by the CAP strategic plan and shall comprise, for each specific objective set out in Article 6(1) and for the contribution of organic farming set out in Section 3a, a comprehensive overall description of the current situation of the area covered by the CAP Strategic Plan, based on common context indicators and other quantitative and qualitative up-to-date information such as studies, past evaluation reports, sectoral analysis and lessons learned from previous experiences.
Amendment 4429 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 103 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part
Article 103 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part
In addition, that description shall notably highlight in relation to each general and specific objective set out in Articles 5 and 6(1) and for the contribution of organic farming set out in Section 3a:
Amendment 4498 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Article 106 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 4672 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 114 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 114 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) identify farming practices and innovations in farming equipment that can increase the number of women in farming.
Amendment 4826 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 123 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 123 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The performance bonus shall be equal to 5% of the amount per Member State for financial year 2027 as set out in Annexes VII and IX.
Amendment 4848 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 124 – paragraph 1
Article 124 – paragraph 1
1. Based on the performance review of the year 2026, the performance bonus withheld from a Member State’s allocation following the second paragraph of Article 123 shall be attributed to this Member State if the result indicators applied to the specific environmental- and climate-related objectives set out in points (d), (e) and (f) of Article 6(1) in its CAP Strategic Plan have achieved at least 90% of their target value for the year 2025.The Commission shall guarantee that the target values across CAP Strategic Plans are equivalent in terms of ambition and feasibility to ensure a level playing field.
Amendment 4866 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 125 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 125 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the contribution of the CAP Strategic Plan to the CAP specific objectives and for the contribution of organic farming set out in section 3a, taking into account national and regional needs and potential for development as well as lessons drawn from implementation of the CAP in previous programming periods;
Amendment 26 #
2018/0213(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The economic and financial crisis has shown that developing sound and resilient economies and financial systems built on strong economic and social structures helps Member States to respond more efficiently to shocks and recover more swiftly from them. The implementation of structural reforms is among the Union’s policy priorities because such reforms seek to set the recovery on a sustainable path, unlock the growth potential, strengthen the adjustment capacity and support the process of upward convergence. Pursuing structural reforms can also contribute to strengthening economic and social cohesion, boosting productivity and investment and creating good conditions for sustainable growth, safeguarding jobs and employment in the Union.
Amendment 31 #
2018/0213(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Against that background, it is necessary to strengthen the current framework for the provision of support to Member States by offering direct financial support, alongside technical support. To that end, a new Reform Support Programme ('the Programme') should be established to provide effective incentives to step up the implementation of structural reforms in the Member States. The Programme should be comprehensive and should also benefit from the experience gained by the Commission and the Member States from the use of the other instruments and programmes. The Programme should also continue the actions and the mode of operation of the SRSP, since they have been proven very useful, and have been appreciated by Member States, for strengthening the administrative capacity of national authorities at all levels of government in various policy domains. The Programme should also include targeted support for reforms in Member States whose currency is not the euro and which have taken demonstrable steps towards adopting the single currency within a given time-frame.
Amendment 37 #
2018/0213(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) Specific objectives should be set for each instrument of the Programme. With regard to the reform delivery tool, they should consist of fulfilling concrete milestones and targets set out in relation to the completion of reform commitments, which would trigger the release of the financial incentives. With regard to the technical support instrument, they should be to assist national authorities at all levels of government in their endeavours to design and implement reforms, by taking into account good practices and lessons learned from peers. Those objectives should be pursued in all Member States under those two instruments and, in the context of the convergence facility, by those Member States whose currency is not the euro and which have taken demonstrable steps towards adopting the single currency within a given time-frame.
Amendment 60 #
2018/0213(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) To foster the stability of the reform commitments, a Member State should have the possibility to amend the reform commitments only once within the period of implementation, where objective circumstances justify such a course of action.
Amendment 77 #
2018/0213(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to contribute to strengthening the administrative capacity of the Member States at all levels of government in relation to challenges faced by institutions, governance, public administration, and economic and social sectors.
Amendment 121 #
2018/0213(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4
Article 12 – paragraph 4
4. Where the Commission gives a negative assessment to a proposal for reform commitments submitted by a Member State, it shall communicate that assessment within fourthree months of the official submission of the proposal for reform commitments by the Member State.
Amendment 126 #
2018/0213(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Pursuant to the objectives set out in point (b) of Article 4 and point (b) of Article 5(2), the technical support instrument shall finance, in particular, the following types of action at national and other levels of government:
Amendment 131 #
2018/0213(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the implementation of reforms by Member States, undertaken on their own initiative, in particular to achieve sustainable economic growth and job creation and preservation;
Amendment 133 #
2018/0213(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Article 20 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall transmit, with the consent of the Member State concerned, the cooperation and support plan to the European Parliament and the Council without undue delay. The Member State concerned may refuse to give such consent in the case of sensitive or confidential information, the disclosure of which would jeopardise public interests of the Member State.
Amendment 134 #
2018/0213(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) as soon as the Member State concerned has redacted all sensitive or confidential information, the disclosure of which would jeopardise public interests of the Member State;
Amendment 142 #
2018/0213(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ensure complementarity, synergy, coherence and consistency among different instruments at Union, national and, where appropriate, regional levels, in particular in relation to measures financed by Union funds, both in the planning phase and during implementation;
Amendment 143 #
2018/0213(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) ensure close cooperation between those responsible for implementation at Union, national and, where appropriate, regional levels to deliver coherent and streamlined support actions under each of the instruments established under this Regulation.
Amendment 41 #
2018/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) As a global ocean actor and the world's fifth largest producer of seafood, the Union has a strong responsibility to protect, conserve and sustainably use the seas, oceans and their resources. Preserving seas and oceans is indeed vital for a rapidly growing world population. It is also of socio-economic interest for the Union: a sustainable blue economy boosts investments, jobs and growth, fosters research and innovation and contributes to energy security through sea and ocean energy. Moreover, safe and secure seas and oceans are essential for an efficient border control and for the global fight against maritime crime, thereby addressing citizens' security concerns.
Amendment 48 #
2018/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) Fisheries are vital to the livelihood, tradition and cultural heritage of many coastal communities in the Union, in particular where small-scale coastal fishing plays an important role. With the average age in many fishing communities being over 50, generational renewal and diversification of activities remain a challenge.
Amendment 49 #
2018/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) It should be possible for the EMFF to support innovation and investments on board fishing vessels in order to improve health, safety and working conditions, environmental protection, energy efficiency and the quality of catches. Such support should, however, not lead to an increase of fishing capacity or ability to find fish and should not be granted simply for complying with requirements that are obligatory under Union or national law. Under the architecture with no prescriptive measures, it should be up to Member States to define the precise eligibility rules for those investments. With regard to health, safety and working conditions on board fishing vessels, a higher aid intensity rate than the one that applies to other operations should be allowed.
Amendment 50 #
2018/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) The success of the CFP is dependent on the availability of scientific advice for the management of fisheries, and hence on the availability of data on fisheries. In the light of the challenges and costs to obtain reliable and complete data, it is necessary to support Member States' actions to collect and, process and exchange data in line with Regulation (EU) No 2017/1004 of the European Parliament and of the Council ('Data Collection Framework Regulation')9 and to contribute to the best available scientific advice. This support should allow synergies with the collection and, processing and exchange of other types of marine data. _________________ 9 Regulation (EU) 2017/1004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on the establishment of a Union framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the common fisheries policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 199/2008 (OJ L 157, 20.06.2017, p. 1).
Amendment 51 #
2018/0210(COD)
(26) Given the challenges to achieve the conservation objectives of the CFP, it should be possible for the EMFF to support actions for the management of fisheries and fishing fleets. In this context, support for fleet adaptation remains sometimes necessary with regard to certain fleet segments and sea basins. Such support should be tightly targeted to the conservation and sustainable exploitation of marine biological resources and aimed to achieve balance between the fishing capacity and the available fishing opportunitiresources. Therefore, it should be possible for the EMFF to support the permanent cessation of fishing activities in fleet segments where the fishing capacity is not balanced with the available fishing opportunitiresources. Such support should be a tool of the action plans for the adjustment of fleet segments with identified structural overcapacity, as provided for in Article 22(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, and should be implemented either through the scrapping of the fishing vessel or through its decommissioning and retrofitting for other activities. Where the retrofitting would lead to an increased pressure of recreational fishing on the marine ecosystem, support should only be granted if in line with the CFP and the objectives of the relevant multiannual plans. In order to ensure the consistency of fleet structural adaptation with conservation objectives, support for the permanent cessation of fishing activities should be strictly conditional and linked to the achievement of results. It should therefore be implemented only by financing not linked to costs, as provided for in Regulation (EU) No [Regulation laying down Common Provisions]. Under that mechanism, Member States should not be reimbursed by the Commission for permanent cessation of fishing activities on the basis of real costs incurred but on the basis of the fulfilment of conditions and of the achievement of results. For this purpose, the Commission should establish in a delegated act such conditions, which should relate to the achievement of the conservation objectives of the CFP.
Amendment 52 #
2018/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Given the high level of unpredictability of fishing activities, exceptional circumstances may cause significant economic losses to fishers. In order to mitigate those consequences, it should be possible for the EMFF to support a compensation for the extraordinary cessation of fishing activities caused by the implementation of certain conservation measures, i.e. multiannual plans, targets for the conservation and sustainable exploitation of stocks, measures to adapt the fishing capacity of fishing vessels to available fishing opportunities and technical measures, by the implementation of emergency measures, by the interruption, due to reasons of force majeure, of the application of a sustainable fisheries partnership agreement, by a natural disaster or by an environmental incident. Support should be granted only if the economic impact on fishers of such circumstances is significant, i.e. if the commercial activities of the vessel concerned are stopped during at least 90 consecutive days and if the economic losses resulting from the cessation amount to more than 30% of the average annual turnover of the business concerned during a specified period of time. The specificities of eel fisheries should be taken into account in the conditions for granting such support.
Amendment 63 #
2018/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
Recital 35
(35) Job creation in coastal regions, and in particular on islands, relies on a locally driven development of a sustainable blue economy that revives the social fabric of those regions. OSea and ocean industries and services are likely to outperform the growth of the global economy and make an important contribution to employment and growth by 2030. To be sustainable, blue growth depends on innovation and investment in new maritime businesses and in the bio- economy, including sustainable tourism models, ocean-based renewable energy, innovative high-end shipbuilding and new port service, which can create jobs and at the same time enhance local development. Whilst public investment in the sustainable blue economy should be mainstreamed throughout the Union budget, the EMFF should specifically concentrate on enabling conditions for the development of the sustainable blue economy and on removing bottlenecks to facilitate investment and the development of new markets and technologies or services. Support for the development of the sustainable blue economy should be delivered through shared, direct and indirect management.
Amendment 66 #
2018/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) Under direct and indirect management, the EMFF should focus on the enabling conditions for a sustainable blue economy through the promotion of an integrated governance and management of the maritime policy, the enhancement of the transfer and uptake of research, innovation and technology in the sustainable blue economy, the improvement of maritime skills, sea and ocean literacy and sharing of socio- economic data on the sustainable blue economy, the promotion of a low-carbon and climate resilient sustainable blue economy and the development of project pipelines and innovative financing instruments. Due consideration to the outermost regions' specific situation should be given in relation to the above mentioned fields.
Amendment 68 #
2018/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
Recital 48
(48) In order to enhance transparency regarding the use of Union funds and their sound financial management, in particular reinforcing public control of the money used, certain information on the operations funded under the EMFF should be published on a website of Member State in accordance with Regulation (EU) No [Regulation laying down Common Provisions]. When a Member State publishes information on operations funded under EMFF, the rules on the protection of personal data set out in Regulation (EU) No 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council24 are to be complied with. _________________ 24 Regulation (EU) No 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 04.05.2016, p. 1).
Amendment 72 #
2018/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) Contributing to food security in the Union through competitive and sustainable aquaculture and markets, having taken into account environmental protection criteria;
Amendment 75 #
2018/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) Enabling the growth of a sustainable blue economy and fostering prosperousity and sustainability in coastal communities;
Amendment 96 #
2018/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5
Article 9 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall develop an analysis for each sea basin indicating the common strengths and weaknesses of the sea basin with regard to the achievement of the objectives of the CFP, as referred to in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013. Where applicable, tThis analysis shall take into account the existing sea basin and macro- regional strategies.
Amendment 106 #
2018/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
(k a) other investments that contribute to the permanent devastation of the marine and coastal ecosystem.
Amendment 113 #
2018/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the first acquisition of a fishing vessel by a young fisher who, at the moment of submitting the application, is under 40 years of age and has worked a least five years as fisher or has acquired adequate vocational qualification;
Amendment 175 #
2018/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the promotion of an integrated governance and management of the maritime policy, including through maritime spatial planning, sea basin strategies and, maritime regional cooperation, EU macro-regional strategies and cross- border cooperation;
Amendment 26 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The Union is confronted with structural challenges arising from economic globalisation, external influences that seek to strengthen protectionism, political influences that are opposed to the continuation of integration processes, the management of migration flows and the increased security threat, clean energy transition, technological change and an increasingly ageing workforce and growing skills and labour shortages in some sectors and regions, experienced especially by SMEs. Taking into account the changing realities of the world of work, the Union should be prepared for the current and future challenges by investing in relevant skills, making growth more inclusive and by improving employment and social policies, including in view of labour mobility.
Amendment 35 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) The ESF+ should aim to promote employment through active interventions enabling (re)integration into the labour market, notably for youth, the long-term unemployed and the inactive, other marginalised groups and disadvantaged groups, as well as through promoting self– employment and the social economy. The ESF+ should aim to improve the functioning of labour markets by supporting the modernisation of labour market institutions such as the Public Employment Services in order to improve their capacity to provide intensified targeted counselling and guidance during the job search and the transition to employment and to enhance workers’ mobility. The ESF+ should promote women's participation in the labour market through measures aiming to ensure, amongst others, improved work/life balance and access to childcare. The ESF + should also aim to provide a healthy and well-adapted working environment in order to respond to health risks related to changing forms of work and the needs of the ageing workforce.
Amendment 39 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The ESF+ should provide support to improving the quality, effectiveness and labour market relevance of education and training systems relating to current and future labour market needs, taking into account the increasing pace of change in the required knowledge and skills in order to facilitate the acquisition of key competences notably as regards digital skills which all individuals need for personal fulfilment and development, employment, social inclusion and active citizenship. The ESF+ should help progression within education and training and transition to work, support lifelong learning and employability, and contribute to competitiveness and societal and economic innovation by supporting scalable and sustainable initiatives in these fields. This could be achieved for example through work-based learning and apprenticeships, lifelong guidance, skills anticipation in cooperation with industry, up-to-date training materials, forecasting and graduate tracking, training of educators, validation of learning outcomes and recognition of qualifications.
Amendment 43 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) Support through the ESF+ should be used to promote equal access for all, in particular for disadvantaged groups, to quality, non-segregated and inclusive education and training, from early childhood education and care through general and vocational education and training and to tertiary level, as well as adult education and learning, thereby fostering permeability between education and training sectors, preventing early school leaving, improving health literacy, reinforcing links with non-formal and informal learning and facilitating learning mobility for all. Synergies with other European programmes, for example the Erasmus programme, notably to facilitate the participation of disadvantaged learners in learning mobility, should be supported within this context.
Amendment 47 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The ESF+ should promote flexible upskilling and reskilling opportunities for all, notably digital skills and key enabling technologies, with a view to providing people with skills adjusted to digitalisation, technological change, innovation and social and economic change in accordance with the needs of the labour market, facilitating career transitions, mobility and supporting in particular low-skilled and/or poorly qualified adults, in line with the Skills Agenda for Europe.
Amendment 51 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) The ESF+ should support Member States and their regions’ efforts to tackle poverty with a view to breaking the cycle of disadvantage across generations and promote social inclusion by ensuring equal opportunities for all, tackling discrimination and addressing health inequalities. This implies mobilising a range of policies targeting the most disadvantaged people regardless of their age, including children, marginalised communities such as the Roma, and the working poor. Particular attention should be paid to the regions of the Member States which, due to their poor economic and social situation, the demographic situation and the migration of mainly young people to more developed European regions, are threatened with long-term stagnation. The ESF+ should promote the active inclusion of people far from the labour market with a view to ensuring their socio-economic integration. The ESF+ should be also used to enhance timely and equal access to affordable, sustainable and high quality services such as healthcare and long-term care, in particular family and community-based care services. The ESF+ should contribute to the modernisation of social protection systems with a view in particular to promoting their accessibility.
Amendment 65 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) In light of the persistent need to enhance efforts to address the management of the migration flows in the Union as a whole and in order to ensure a coherent, strong and consistent support to the solidarity and responsibility-sharing efforts, the ESF+ should provide support to promotefor the socio-economic integration of third country nationals complementary to the actions financed under the Asylum and Migration Fund, and in order to better connect migration processes with the development needs of the labour market.
Amendment 78 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) In the light of persistently high levels of youth unemployment and inactivity in a number of Member States and regions, in particular affecting young people who are neither in employment, nor in education or training, it is necessary that those Member States continue to invest sufficient resources of the ESF+ strand under shared management towards actions to promote youth employment including through the implementation of Youth Guarantee schemes. Building on the actions supported by the Youth Employment Initiative in the 2014-2020 programming period targeting individual persons, Member States should further promote employment and education reintegration pathways and outreach measures for young people by prioritising, where relevant, long-term unemployed, inactive and disadvantaged young people including through youth work. Member States and their regions should also invest in measures aimed at facilitating school-to- work transition as well as reforming and adapting employment services with a view to providing tailor-made support to young people. Member States concerned should therefore allocate at least 10 % of their national resources of the ESF+ strand under shared management to support youth employability.
Amendment 80 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
Amendment 88 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) Efficient and effective implementation of actions supported by the ESF+ depends on good governance and partnership between all actors at the relevant territorial levels and the socio- economic actors, in particular the social partners and civil society. It is therefore essential that Member States encourage the participation of regional and local authorities, social partners and civil society in the implementation of the ESF+ under shared management.
Amendment 98 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) ESF+ lays down provisions intended to achieve freedom of movement for workers on a non-discriminatory basis by ensuring the close cooperation of the central employment services of Member States with one another and with the Commission. The European network of employment services should promote a better functioning of the labour markets by facilitating the cross-border mobility of workers and a greater transparency and integration of information on the labour markets. The ESF+ scope also includes developing and supporting targeted mobility schemes with a view to filling vacancies where labour market shortcomings have been identified.
Amendment 116 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
The ESF+ aims to support Member States to achieve high employment levels, fair social protection and a skilled and resilient workforce ready for the current and future world of work, in line with the principles set out in the European Pillar of Social Rights proclaimed by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on 17 November 2017.
Amendment 119 #
2018/0206(COD)
The ESF+ shall support, complement and add value to the policies of the Member States and regional and local authorities to ensure equal opportunities, access to the labour market, fair working conditions, social protection and inclusion, and a high level of human health protection.
Amendment 131 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point ii
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point ii
ii. mModernising and integrating labour market institutions and services to assess and anticipate skills needs and ensure timely and tailor-made assistance and support to labour market matching, transitions and mobility;
Amendment 138 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point iv
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point iv
iv. improving the quality, effectiveness, flexibility and labour market relevance of education and training systems, to support acquisition of key competences including digital skills;
Amendment 141 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point v
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point v
v. promoting equal access to and completion of, quality and inclusive education and training, in particular for marginalised and disadvantaged groups, from early childhood education and care through general and vocational education and training, and to tertiary level, as well as adult education and learning, including facilitating learning mobility for all;
Amendment 145 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point viii
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point viii
viii. promoting socio-economic integration of third country nationals and of marginalised communities such as the Roma, and the better connection of migration flows with the labour market;
Amendment 200 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall ensure adequate participation of regional and local authorities, social partners and civil society organisations in the delivery of employment, education and social inclusion policies supported by the ESF+ strand under shared management.
Amendment 219 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall support actions of social innovation and social experimentations, or strengthen bottom-up approaches based on partnerships involving regional and local authorities, public authorities, the private sector, and civil society such as the Local Action Groups designing and implementing community-led local development strategies.
Amendment 239 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point f
f) to support integration and networking at Union level, ands well as dialogue with and among relevant stakeholders in the fields referred to in Article 4 and contribute to build up the institutional capacity of these stakeholders, including the public employment services (PES), social security institutions, microfinance institutions and institutions providing finance to social enterprises and social economy;
Amendment 240 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point c – introductory part
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point c – introductory part
(c) CIntegration and capacity building, in particular:
Amendment 249 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point c – introductory part
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point c – introductory part
(c) CIntegration and capacity building, in particular:
Amendment 20 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) In its ‘Reflection Paper on Harnessing Globalisation’20 the Commission identifies the combination of trade related globalisation and technological change as the major drivers of an increased demand for skilled labour and a reduced number of jobs that require lower qualifications. Despite the overall tremendous advantages of more open trade and further integration of world economies, these negative side effects need to be tackled. As the current benefits of globalisation are already unequally distributed among people and, regions and states, causing a significant impact on those adversely affected, there is a danger that the ever faster evolving technological advances will further fuel these effects. Therefore, in line with the principles of solidarity and sustainability, it will be necessary to ensure that the benefits of globalisation will be shared more fairly by reconciling economic opening and technological advance with social protection. _________________ 20 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publicatio ns/reflection-paper-harnessing- globalisation_en.
Amendment 21 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) In its ‘Reflection Paper on Harnessing Globalisation’20 the Commission identifies the combination of trade related globalisation and technological change as the major drivers of an increased demand for skilled labour and a reduced number of jobs that require lower qualifications. Despite the overall tremendous advantages of more open trade and further integration of world economies, these negative side effects need to be tackled. As the current benefits of globalisation are already unequally distributed among people and regions, causing a significant impact on those adversely affected, there is a danger that the ever faster evolving technological advances will further fuel these effects. Therefore, in line with the principles of solidarity and sustainability, it will be necessary to ensure that the benefits of globalisation will be shared more fairly by reconciling economic opening and technological advance with social protectionre-employment measures. _________________ 20 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publicatio ns/reflection-paper-harnessing- globalisation_en.
Amendment 36 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) As stated, in order to maintain the European nature of the EGF, an application for support should be triggered when a major restructuring event causes a significant impact on the local or regional economy. Such an impact should be defined by a minimum number of job displacements within a specific reference period. Taking into account the findings of the mid-term evaluation, the threshold shall be set at 25100 jobs displacement within a reference period of four months (or 6 months in sectoral cases). Taking into account that waves of dismissals in different sectors but the same region have an equally significant impact on the local labour market, regional applications shall be possible as well. In small labour markets, such as small Member States or remote regions, including the outermost regions as referred in Article 349 of the TFEU, or in exceptional circumstances, applications could be submitted in case of a lower number of job displacements.
Amendment 39 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
Recital 14 a (new)
(14 a) The EGF should remain as a special EU instrument reacting to situations that cause major restructuring events in the European labour market. However, the Union should continue with efforts to find more sustainable ways of tackling the structural change and the challenges that affect labour markets and lead to restructuring events in the Member States.
Amendment 46 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Financial contributions from the EGF should be primarily directed at active labour market measures aimed at reintegrating beneficiaries rapidly into sustainable employment, either within or outside their initial sector of activity. Measures should reflect the prospected needs of the local or, regional and national labour market. However, whenever relevant, the mobility of displaced workers should also be supported in order to help find new employment elsewhere. A particular focus shall be laid on the dissemination of skills required in the digital age. The inclusion of pecuniary allowances in a coordinated package of personalised services should be restricted. Companies could be encouraged to participate in the national co-funding for the EGF-supported measures.
Amendment 51 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) Member States should pay particular attention to disadvantaged beneficiaries, less educated or with insufficient skills, including young and older unemployed persons and those at risk of poverty, when designing the coordinated package of active labour market policy measures, given that those groups experience particular problems in re- entering the labour market. Notwithstanding, the principles of gender equality and of non-discrimination, which are among the Union’s core values and are enshrined in the European Pillar of Social Rights, should be respected and promoted when implementing the EGF.
Amendment 58 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24 a (new)
Recital 24 a (new)
(24 a) Financial contributions from the EGF should create real European added value. They cannot replace national measures or measures that are the responsibility of dismissing companies under national law or collective agreements.
Amendment 61 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) In the interest of the beneficiaries, assistance should be made available asdelivered quickly and efficiently as possible. The Member States and the Union institutions involved in the EGF decision-making process should do their utmost to reduce processing time and simplify procedures so as to ensure the smooth and rapid adoption of decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF. Therefore, the Budgetary Authority shall in the future decide on transfer requests submitted by the Commission, not requiring a Commission Proposal for the mobilisation of the EGF anymore.
Amendment 65 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
The EGF shall contribute to a better distribution of the benefits of globalisation and technological advance by helping displaced workers adapt to structural change in order to find a new employment. As such, the EGF shall contribute to the implementation of the principles defined under the European Pillar of Social Rights and enhance social and economic cohesion among regions and Member States.
Amendment 71 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of the programme is to demonstrate solidarity with and offer support tofinancial support for re- employment measures of displaced workers and self-employed persons whose activity has ceased in the course of unexpected major restructuring events, referred to in Article 5.
Amendment 75 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The specific objective of the EGF is to offer assistance in case of unexpected major restructuring events, particularly those caused by globalisation-related challenges, such as changes in world trade patterns, competing with competitors who are in privileged position in relation to EU competition rules, trade disputes, financial or economic crises, the transition to low- carbon economy or as a consequence of digitisation or automation. Particular emphasis shall lie on measures that help the most disadvantaged groups.
Amendment 79 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The specific objective of the EGF is to offer assistance in case of unexpected major restructuring events, particularly those caused by globalisation-related challenges, such as changes in world trade patterns, trade disputes between the EU and third countries, financial or economic crises, the transition to low- carbon economy or as a consequence of digitisation or automation. Particular emphasis shall lie on measures that help the most disadvantaged groups.
Amendment 86 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the cessation of activity of more than 25100 displaced workers or self- employed persons, over a reference period of four months, in an enterprise in a Member State, including where that cessation applies in its suppliers or downstream producers;
Amendment 91 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the cessation of activity of more than 25100 displaced workers or self- employed persons, over a reference period of six months, particularly in SMEs, where all operate in the same economic sector defined at NACE Revision 2 division level and located in one region or two contiguous regions defined at NUTS 2 level or in more than two contiguous regions defined at NUTS 2 level provided that there are more than 25100 workers or self-employed persons affected in two of the regions combined;
Amendment 96 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the cessation of activity of more than 25100 displaced workers or self- employed persons, over a reference period of four months, particularly in SMEs, operating in the same or different economic sectors defined at NACE Revision 2 division level and located in the same region defined at NUTS 2 level.
Amendment 111 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The applicant Member State shall submit an application to the Commission within 12 weeks of the date on which the criteria set out in Article 5(2) or (3) are met. In certain circumstances that deadline could be longer.
Amendment 114 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. On the basis of the information provided by the Member State, the Commission shall complete its assessment of the application’s compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution, within 6045 working days of the receipt of the complete application or, where applicable, of the translation of the application. Where the Commission is unable, exceptionally, to comply with that deadline, it shall provide a written explanation setting out the reasons for the delay.
Amendment 58 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Regulation (EU) [new CPR] of the European Parliament and of the Council21 sets out provisions common to the ERDF and certain other funds and Regulation (EU) [new ERDF] of the European Parliament and of the Council22 sets out provisions concerning the specific objectives and the scope of the ERDF support. It is now necessary to adopt specific provisions in relation to the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) where one or more Member States and their regions cooperate across borders with regard to effective programming including provisions on technical assistance, monitoring, evaluation, communication, eligibility, management and control, as well as financial management. _________________ 21 [Reference] 22 [Reference]
Amendment 62 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In order to support the harmonious development of the Union's territory at different levels, the ERDF should support cross-border cooperation, transnational cooperation, maritime cooperation, outermost regions’ cooperation and interregion, interregional cooperation and other forms of territorial cooperation under the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg).
Amendment 71 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions, and to exploit the untapped growth potential in border areas as evidenced in the Communication of the Commission 'Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions’23 ('Border Regions Communication'). Consequently, the cross-border component should be limited to cooperation on land borders and cross- border cooperation on maritime borders should be integrated into the transnational component. _________________ 23 Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament 'Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions' - COM(2017) 534 final, 20.9.2017.
Amendment 80 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The cross-border cooperation component should also involve cooperation between one or more Member States or their regions, and one or more countries or regions, or other territories outside the Union. Covering internal and external cross-border cooperation under this Regulation should result in a major simplification and streamlining of applicable provisions for the programme authorities in the Member States and for the partner authorities and beneficiaries outside the Union compared to the programming period 2014 -2020.
Amendment 86 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation component should aim to strengthen cooperation by means of actions conducive to integrated and uniformed territorial development linked to the Union's cohesion policy priorities, and should also include maritime cross- border cooperation. Transnational cooperation should cover larger territories on the mainland of the Union, whereas maritime cooperation should cover territories around sea-basins and integrate cross-border cooperation on maritime borders during the programming period 2014 -2020. Maximum flexibility should be given to continue implementing previous maritime cross-border cooperation within a larger maritime cooperation framework, in particular by defining the territory covered, the specific objectives for such cooperation, the requirements for a project partnership and the setting-up of sub-programmes and specific steering committees. When defining the scope of transnational and maritime cooperation, it is necessary to consider the areas of the existing EU macro-regional strategies.
Amendment 92 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Based on the experience with cross- border and transnational cooperation during the programming period 2014 -2020 in outermost regions, where the combination of both components within a single programme per cooperation area has not brought about sufficient simplification for programme authorities and beneficiaries, a specific outermost regions’ component should be established in order to enable outermost regions to cooperate with their neighbouring countries and, territories and regions in the most effective and simple way.
Amendment 98 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Based on the experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014 -2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting the effectiveness of cohesion policy. That component should therefore be limited to twocover programmes: one to enable all kind of experience, innovative approaches and capacity building for programmes under both goals and to promoteassist with formation and operation of European groupings of territorial cooperation ('EGTCs'’) set up or to be set up pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament andas well as EU macro-regional strategies set up ofr the Council24 and oneo be set up and programmes to improve the analysis of development trends. PInterregional project- based cooperation throughout the Union should be integrated into the new component on interregional innovation investments and closely lmaintainked to the implementation of the Communication from the Commission 'Strengthening Innovation in Europe's Regions: Strategies for resilient, inclusive and sustainable growth'25, in particular to support thematic smart specialisation platforms on fields such as energy, industrial modernisation or agrifood. Finally, integrated territorial development focusing on functional urban areas or urban areas should be concentrated within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal and in one accompanying instrument, the ‘European Urban Initiative”. The two programmes under the interregional cooperation component should cover the whole Union and should also be open for the participation of third countries. _________________ 24 Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on a European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC) (OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 19). 25 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ‘Strengthening Innovation in Europe's Regions: Strategies for resilient, inclusive and sustainable growth’, COM(2017) 376 final, 18.7.2017’ regions.
Amendment 115 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) It is necessary to continue supporting or, as appropriate, to establish cooperation in all its dimensions with the Union's neighbouring third countries, as such cooperation is an important regional development and enlargement policy tool and should benefit the regions of the Member States which border third countries. To that effect, the ERDF and the external financing instruments of the Union, IPA27, NDICI28 and OCTP29, should support programmes under cross- border cooperation, transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, outermost regions’ cooperation and interregional cooperation. The support from the ERDF and from the external financing instruments of the Union should be based on reciprocity and proportionality. However, for IPA III CBC and NDICI CBC, the ERDF support should be complemented by at least equivalent amounts under IPA III CBC and NDICI CBC, subject to a maximum amount set out in the respective legal act, that is to say, up to 3 % of the financial envelope under IPA III and up to 4 % of the financial envelope of the Neighbourhood geographic programme under Article 4(2)(a) of the NDICI. _________________ 27 Regulation (EU) XXX establishing the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (OJ L xx, p. y). 28 Regulation (EU) XXX establishing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (OJ L xx, p. y). 29 Council Decision (EU) XXX on the association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Inion including relations between the European Union on the one hand and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark on the other (OJ L xx, p. y).
Amendment 122 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) IPA III assistance should mainly focus on assisting the IPA beneficiaries to strengthen democratic institutions and the rule of law, reform the judiciary and public administration, respect fundamental rights and promote gender equality, tolerance, social inclusion and non-discrimination as well as regional and local development. IPA assistance should continue to support the efforts of the IPA beneficiaries to advance regional, macro-regional and cross-border cooperation as well as territorial development, including through the implementation of Union macro- regional strategies. In addition, IPA assistance should address security, migration and border management, ensuring access to international protection, sharing relevant information, enhancing border control and pursuing common efforts in the fight against irregular migration and migrant smuggling.
Amendment 127 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) In view of the specific situation of outmost regions of the Union, it is necessary to adopt measures concerning the improvement of conditions under which those regions may have access to structural funds. Consequently, certain provisions of this Regulation should be adapted to the specificities of the outermost regions in order to simplify and foster cooperation with their neighbors, while taking into account the Communication from the Commission 'A stronger and renewed strategic partnership with the EU's outermost regions'31. _________________ 31 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank 'A stronger and renewed strategic partnership with the EU's outermost regions', - COM(2017) 623 final, 24.10.2017.
Amendment 134 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) It is necessary to set out the resources allocated to each of the different components of Interreg, including each Member State's share of the global amounts for the cross-border cooperation, the transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, the outermost regions’ cooperation and the interregional cooperation, the potential available to Member States concerning flexibility between those components. Compared to the programming period 2014 -2020, the share for cross-border cooperation should be reduced, while the share for transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation should be increased because of the integration of maritime cooperation, and a new outermost regions’ cooperation component should be created.
Amendment 138 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) Within the context of the unique and specific circumstances on the island of Ireland, and with a view to supporting North-South cooperation under the Good Friday Agreement, a new 'PEACE PLUS' cross-border programme shouldall be continued and build on the work of previous programmes between the border counties of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Taking into account its practical importance, it is necessary to ensure that, where the programme is acting in support of peace and reconciliation, the ERDF should also contribute to promoting social, economic and regional stability and cooperation in the regions concerned, in particular through actions to promote cohesion between communities. Given the specificities of the programme it should be managed in an integrated manner with the United Kingdom contribution being integrated into the programme as external assigned revenue. Furthermore, certain rules on the selection of operations in this Regulation should not apply to that programme in relation to operations in support of peace and reconciliation.
Amendment 141 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) This Regulation should add two Interreg-specific objectives: one to support an Interreg-specific objective strengthening institutional capacity, enhancing legal and administrative cooperation, in particular where linked to implementation of the Border Regions Communication, intensify cooperation between citizens and, NGOs and public institutions and the development and coordination of EU macro-regional and sea- basin strategies, and one to address specific external cooperation issues such as safety, security, border crossing management and migration.
Amendment 152 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) It is necessary to clarify the rules governing small project funds which have been implemented since Interreg has existed, but have never been covered by specific provisions. As also set out in the Opinion of the Committee of the Regions ‘People-to-people and small-scale projects in cross-border cooperation programmes’32, such small project funds play an important role in building up trust between citizens and institutions, offer great European added value and contribute considerably to the overall objective of cross-border cooperation programmes by overcoming border obstacles, local and regional development and integrating border areas and their citizens. In order to simplify the management of the financing of small projects by the final recipients, who are often not used to applying for Union funds, the use of simplified cost options and of lump sums should be made obligatory below a certain threshold. _________________ 32 Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions ‘People-to-people and small- scale projects in cross-border cooperation programmes’ of 12 July 2017 (OJ C 342, 12.10.2017, p. 38).
Amendment 155 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) Based on the experience during the programming period 2014 -2020, the system introducing a clear hierarchy of rules on eligibility of expenditure should be continued while maintaining the principle of rules on eligibility of expenditure to be established at Union level or for Interreg programme as a whole to avoid any possible contradictions or inconsistencies between different Regulations and between Regulations and national rules. Additional rules adopted by one Member State which would only apply to the beneficiaries in that Member State should be limited to the strict minimumavoided. In particular, provisions of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 481/201433 adopted for the programming period 2014 - 2020 should be integrated into this Regulation. _________________ 33 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 481/2014 of 4 March 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1299/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to specific rules on eligibility of expenditure for cooperation programmes (OJ L 138, 13.5.2014, p. 45).
Amendment 161 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Member States should be encouraged to assign the functions of the managing authority to anthe existing EGTCs or to make such a grouping, like other cross- border legal bodies, responsible for managing a sub-programme, an integrated territorial investment or one or more small project funds, or to act as sole partner.
Amendment 175 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down rules for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) with a view to fostering cooperation between Member States and their regions inside the Union and between Member States, their regions and adjacent third countries, partner countries, other territories or overseas countries and territories ('OCTs') respectively.
Amendment 183 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part
(1) cross-border cooperation between adjacent regions to promote integrated and uniform regional development (component 1):
Amendment 184 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
(a) internal cross-border cooperation between adjacent landland or maritime border regions of two or more Member States or between adjacent landland or maritime border regions of at least one Member State and one or more third countries listed in Article 4(3); or
Amendment 192 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – introductory part
(b) external cross-border cooperation, between adjacent land or maritime border regions of at least one Member State and of one or more of the following:
Amendment 207 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) outermost regions' cooperation among themselves and with their neighbouring third or partner countries or OCTs, or several thereof, to facilitate their regional integration and uniform development in their neighbourhood ('component 3');
Amendment 216 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b a (new)
(ba) by promoting the implementation of common interregional development projects.
Amendment 229 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. For cross-border cooperation, the regions to be supported by the ERDF shall be the NUTS level 3 regions of the Union along all internal and external land and maritime borders with third countries or partner countries.
Amendment 237 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Regions on maritime borders which are connected over the sea by a fixed link shall also be supported under cross-border cooperation.
Amendment 240 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. For external cross-border cooperation, the regions to be supported by IPA III or NDICI shall be NUTS level 3 regions of the respective partner country or, in the absence of NUTS classification, equivalent areas along all land and maritime borders between Member States and partner countries eligible under IPA III or NDICI.
Amendment 250 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. For transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, the regions to be supported by the ERDF shall be the NUTS level 2 regions of the Union covering contiguous functional areas, taking into account, where applicable, the existing EU macro-regional strategies or sea basin strategies.
Amendment 292 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) 52.760% (i.e. a total of EUR 4 440 000 000xxxxxx) for cross-border cooperation (component 1);
Amendment 302 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) 31.420.3% (i.e. a total of EUR 2 649 900 000xxxxxxx) for transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation (component 2);
Amendment 324 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) 1.2 5% (i.e. a total of EUR 100 000 000xxxxxx) for interregional cooperation (component 4);
Amendment 363 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than 70 %, unless, with regard to external cross-border or component 3 Interreg programmes, a higher percentage is fixed in Regulations (EU) [IPA III], [NDICI] or Council Decision (EU) [OCTP] respectively or in any act adopted thereunder85%.
Amendment 376 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. In the case of the PEACE PLUS programme, where it is acting in support of peace and reconciliation, the ERDF, as a specific objective under policy objective 4, shall also contribute to promoting social, economic and regional stability and cooperation in the regions concerned, in particular through actions to promote cohesion between communities. A separate priority shall support that specific objective.
Amendment 385 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a – point ii
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a – point ii
ii. enhance efficient public administration by promoting legal and administrative cooperation and cooperation between citizens and, NGOs and public institutions, in particular, with a view to resolving legal and other obstacles in border regions;
Amendment 391 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) under component 1, 2 and 3 Interreg programmes: enhance institutional capacity of public authorities and stakeholders to implement the existing EU macro-regional strategies and sea-basin strategies;
Amendment 513 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The contribution from the ERDF or, where applicable, an external financing instrument of the Union, to a small project fund within an Interreg programme shall not exceed EUR 20 000 000 or 125% of the total allocation of the Interreg programme, whichever is lower.
Amendment 523 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. The beneficiaryies of a small project fund shall be a cross-border legal bodyies, EU regions or an EGTC.
Amendment 559 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Each monitoring committee shall adopt its rules of procedure during its first meeting on the basis of a template prepared by the Commission in the light of positive experience, in order to simplify and harmonise the procedure of adopting the Rules of Procedure.
Amendment 568 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
The monitoring committee shall also include representatives of regions and local governments as well as other bodies jointly set up in the whole programme area or covering a part thereof, including EGTCs.
Amendment 656 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The managing authority, after consultation with the Member States and, where applicable, any third countries, partner countries or OCTs participating in the Interreg programme, shall set up a joint secretariat, with staff composition taking into account the programme partnership composition.
Amendment 91 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) Horizontal principles as set out in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union ('TEU') and in Article 10 of the TFEU, including principles of subsidiarity and proportionality as set out in Article 5 of the TEU, should be respected in the implementation of the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund, taking into account the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Member States should also respect the obligations of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and ensure accessibility in line with its article 9 and in accordance with the Union law harmonising accessibility requirements for products and services. Member States and the Commission should aim at eliminating inequalities and at promoting equality between men and women and integrating the gender perspective, as well as at combating discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation. The Funds should not support actions that contribute to any form of segregation or intolerance. The objectives of the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund should be pursued in the framework of sustainable development and the Union's promotion of the aim of preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment as set out in Articles 11 and 191(1) of the TFEU, taking into account the polluter pays principle. In order to protect the integrity of the internal market, operations benefitting undertakings shall comply with State aid rules as set out in Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU.
Amendment 106 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In order to support the efforts of Member States and regions in facing new challenges and ensuring a high level of security for their citizens as well as the prevention of radicalisation, while relying on the synergies and complementarities with other Union policies, investments under the ERDF should contribute to security in areas where there is a need to ensure safe and secure public spaces and critical infrastructure, such as transport, communications and energy.
Amendment 115 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) Investments under the ERDF should contribute to raising citizens' quality of life, to overcoming negative demographic trends by investing in social, cultural, health, educational and tourism infrastructure, creating the prerequisites for keeping and attracting people and businesses.
Amendment 119 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) In order to improve the overall administrative capacity of institutions and governance in Member States, including at the regional and local levels, implementing programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal, it is necessary to enable supporting measures under all of the specific objectives.
Amendment 122 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) In order to encourage and boost cooperation measures, within programmes implemented under the Investment for jobs and growth goal, it is necessary to enhance cooperation measures with partners within a given Member State or between different Member States in relation to support provided under all of the specific objectives. Such enhanced cooperation is additional to the cooperation under ETC/Interreg and should in particular support cooperation among structured partnerships with a view to implementing regional strategies as referred to in the Communication from the Commission ‘Strengthening Innovation in Europe's Regions: Strategies for resilient, inclusive and sustainable growth’17. Partners may therefore come from any region in the Union, but may also include cross-border regions and regions which are all covered by European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation, a macro-regional or sea-basin strategy or a combination of the two. _________________ 17 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions of 8 July 2017 - COM(2017) 376 final.
Amendment 149 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) The ERDF should help to redress the main regional imbalances in the Union and to reduce disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions including those facing challenges due to the decarbonisation commitments. ERDF support under the Investment for jobs and growth goal should therefore be concentrated on key Union priorities in line with policy objectives laid down in Regulation (EU) 2018/xxx [new CPR]. Therefore support from the ERDF should be concentrated on the policy objectives of 'a smarter Europe by promoting innovative and smart economic transformation' and 'a greener, low-carbon Europe by promoting the transition to clean and fair energy transition, green and blue investment, the circular economy, climate adaptation and risk prevention and management'. That thematic concentration should be attained at national level while allowing for flexibility at the level of individual programmes and between the three groups of Member States formed according to respective gross national income. In addition, the methodology to classify Member States should be set out in detail taking into account the specific situation of the outermost regions.
Amendment 160 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) This Regulation should set out the different types of activities the costs of which may be supported by means of investments from the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund, under their respective objectives as set out in the TFEU. The Cohesion Fund should be able to support investments in the environment and in TEN-T. With regard to the ERDF, the list of activities should be simplified and it should be able totake into account specific national and regional development needs and support investments in infrastructure, investments in relation to access to services, productive investments in SME's, equipment, software and intangible assets, as well as measures with regard to information, communication, studies, networking, cooperation, exchange of experiences and activities involving clusters. In order to support the programme implementation, both funds should also be able to support technical assistance activities. Finally, in order to support provide for a broader range of interventions for Interreg programmes, the scope should be enlarged to also include the sharing a broad range of facilities and human resources and costs linked to measures within the scope of the ESF+.
Amendment 180 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) In order to maximise the contribution to territorial and local development, actions in this field should be based on integrated territorial strategies including in urban areas. Therefore, the ERDF support should be delivered through the forms set out in Article 22 of Regulation (EU) 2018/xxxx [new CPR] ensuring appropriate involvement of local, regional and urban authorities.
Amendment 373 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – point iv a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – point iv a (new)
iv a. Investing in cultural, social and tourism infrastructure in order to create the conditions to overcome negative demographic trends and attract business investment.
Amendment 389 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – introductory part
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – introductory part
(e) 'a Europe closer to citizens by fostering the sustainable and integrated development of urban, rural, mountainous island and coastal areas and local initiatives' ('PO 5') by:
Amendment 403 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – point i
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – point i
(i) fostering the integrated social, economic and environmental development, cultural heritage, tourism and security in urban areas;
Amendment 414 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – point ii
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – point ii
(ii) fostering the integrated social, economic and environmental local development, cultural heritage, tourism and security, including for rural, mountainous and coastal areas also through community-led local development.
Amendment 436 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Cooperation referred to in point (b) shall include cooperation with partners from cross-border regions, from non-contiguous regions or from regions located in the territory covered by European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation, a macro- regional or sea-basin strategy or a combination thereof.
Amendment 446 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Amendment 603 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e
Amendment 618 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f
Amendment 627 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g
Amendment 643 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i
Amendment 651 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point j
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point j
Amendment 659 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point j – point i
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point j – point i
Amendment 663 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point j – point ii
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point j – point ii
Amendment 673 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. In addition, the Cohesion Fund shall not support investment in housing unless related to social housing, preserving cultural heritage, the promotion of energy efficiency or renewable energy use.
Amendment 164 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) Horizontal principles as set out in Article 3 of the Treaty on the European Union ('TEU') and in Article 10 of the TFEU, including principles of subsidiarity and proportionality as set out in Article 5 of the TEU should be respected in the implementation of the Funds, taking into account the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Member States should also respect the obligations of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and ensure accessibility in line with its article 9 and in accordance with the Union law harmonising accessibility requirements for products and services. Member States and the Commission should aim at eliminating inequalities and at promoting equality between men and women and integrating the gender perspective, as well as at combating discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation. The Funds should not support actions that contribute to any form of segregation or intolerance. The objectives of the Funds should be pursued in the framework of sustainable development and the Union's promotion of the aim of preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment as set out in Article 11 and Article 191(1) of the TFEU, taking into account the polluter pays principle. In order to protect the integrity of the internal market, operations benefitting undertakings shall comply with Union State aid rules as set out in Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU.
Amendment 192 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) The principle of partnership is a key feature in the implementation of the Funds, building on the multi-level governance approach and ensuring the involvement of civil society and social partners, as well as local and regional levels of government. In order to provide continuity in the organisation of partnership, Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 240/201413 should continue to apply. _________________ 13 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 240/2014 of 7 January 2014 on the European code of conduct on partnership in the framework of the European Structural and Investment Funds (OJ L 74, 14.3.2014, p. 1).
Amendment 238 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) Member States should establish a performance framework for each programme covering all indicators, milestones, deadlines and targets to monitor, report on and evaluate programme performance.
Amendment 272 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) To strengthen the integrated territorial development approach, investments in the form of territorial tools such as integrated territorial investments ('ITI'), community-led local development ('CLLD') or any other territorial tool under policy objective "a Europe closer to citizens" supporting initiatives designed by the Member State for investments programmed for the ERDF should be based on territorial, regional and local development strategies. For the purposes of ITIs and territorial tools designed by Member States, minimum requirements should be set out for the content of territorial strategies. Those territorial strategies should be developed and endorsed under the responsibility of relevant authorities or bodies. To ensure the involvement of relevant authorities or bodies in implementing territorial strategies, those authorities or bodies should be responsible for the selection of operations to be supported, or involved in that selection.
Amendment 275 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) To better mobilise potential at the regional and local level, it is necessary to strengthen and facilitate CLLDommunity-led regional and local development. It should take into account local needs and potential, as well as relevant socio-cultural characteristics, and should provide for structural changes, build community capacity and stimulate innovation and management capacities. The close cooperation and integrated use of the Funds to deliver regional and local development strategies should be strengthened. Local action groups, representing the interests of the community, should be, as an essential principle responsible for the design and implementation of CLLD strategies. In order to facilitate coordinated support from different Funds to CLLDommunity-led regional and local development strategies and to facilitate their implementation, the use of a 'Lead Fund' approach should be facilitated.
Amendment 307 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48 a (new)
Recital 48 a (new)
(48a) To support the effective use of the Funds, the significant EIB Group's expertise in implementing and advising on project preparation and implementation, as well as on financial instruments and investment platforms should continue to be utilized, for the benefit of all Managing Authorities wishing to implement such instruments. This would include awareness raising and capacity building actions, as well as project identification and implementation support, funded either at Union level or by Member States as appropriate.
Amendment 410 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) a greener, low-carbon Europe by promoting clean and fairLow-carbon and circular Europe economy by promoting zero emission energy transition, greelow carbon and blue investment, the circular economy, climate adaptation and risk prevention and management;
Amendment 430 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) a Europe closer to citizens by fostering the sustainable and integrated development of urban, rural and coastal areas, mountainous, coastal and island areas, and regional, cross-border and local initiatives.
Amendment 484 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Each Member State shall organise a partnership with theall relevant and competent regional and local authorities. That partnership shall include at least the following partners:
Amendment 496 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) regional, urban and other public authorities;
Amendment 500 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) economic, research institutions, universities and social partners;
Amendment 618 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) a summary of the actions which the Member State concerned shall take to reinforce its administrative capacity of the implementation of the Fundmanagement and control system of the Funds as well as a summary of the actions for simplifying the procedures for beneficiaries.
Amendment 620 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) a summary of the actions which the Member State concerned shall take to reinforce its administrative capacity of programme management and the implementation of the Funds.
Amendment 636 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 a (new)
Article 8 a (new)
Article 8 a Upon request of a Member State, the EIB shall contribute to the preparation of elements (b), (c), (e), (f) and (g) above.
Amendment 745 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) the output and resultquantitative and qualitative indicators linked to specific objectives set in the Fund-specific Regulations;
Amendment 749 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. The Member State shall makepublish those methodologies available upon request by the Commissionon the relevant national website and the Commission should make it available in a working language on its website.
Amendment 809 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 6
Article 15 – paragraph 6
Amendment 885 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point ii
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) market failures, investment needs at national regional and local level, and complementarity with other forms of support;
Amendment 898 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iv
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iv
(iv) challenges in administrative capacity and governance;, including actions related to enhancing capacities to manage programmes and projects.
Amendment 899 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iv
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iv
(iv) challenges in administrative capacity and governance and simplification measures;
Amendment 902 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point v
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point v
(v) lessons learnt from past experience in terms of simplification of procedures for beneficiaries;
Amendment 932 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point iv
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point iv
(iv) specific territories targeted, including the planned use of integrated territorial investment, community-led regional and local development or other territorial tools;
Amendment 934 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point v
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point v
(v) the interregional, cross-border and transnational actions with beneficiaries located in at least one other Member State;
Amendment 1005 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4
Article 18 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall adopt a decision by means of an implementing act approving the programme no later than sixthree months after the date of submission of the programme by the Member State.
Amendment 1007 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. The Member State may submit at any time a motivated request for an amendment of a programme together with the amended programme setting out the expected impact of that amendment on the achievement of the objectives.
Amendment 1032 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 4
Article 19 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall approve the amendment of a programme no later than sixthree months after its submission by the Member State.
Amendment 1074 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
Article 21 – paragraph 1
1. Taking into account the socio- economic specificities of the Member States and regions concerned, Member States may request the transfer of up to 50 % of programme financial allocations from any of the Funds to any other Fund under shared management or, and up to 10% to any instrument under direct or indirect management.
Amendment 1098 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Member State shall support integrated territorial development through territorial, regional and local development strategies in any of the following forms:
Amendment 1101 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) community-led regional and local development;
Amendment 1124 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. Territorial strategies shall be drawn up under the responsibility of the relevant urban, local or other territorial authorities or bodies, and in particular to address the urban rural linkages.
Amendment 1126 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. Territorial strategies shall be drawn up under the responsibility of the relevant regional, urban, local or other territorial authorities or bodies.
Amendment 1130 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Where the list of operations to be supported has not been included in the territorial strategy, the relevant regional, urban, local or other territorial authorities or bodies shall select or shall be involved in the selection of operations.
Amendment 1138 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 4
Article 23 – paragraph 4
4. Where an regional, urban, local or other territorial authority or body carries out tasks falling under the responsibility of the managing authority other than the selection of operations, the authority shall be identified by the managing authority as an intermediate body.
Amendment 1155 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. The ERDF, the ESF+ and the EMFF mayshall support community-led local development.
Amendment 1164 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) based on priorities established following a bottom-up approach.
Amendment 1180 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) the management, monitoring and evaluation arrangements, demonstrating the capacity of the local action group to implement that strategy and to manage projects;
Amendment 1198 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) capacity building and preparatory actions supporting the design and future implementation of the strategies and, where necessary, supporting project management;
Amendment 1199 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1
Article 29 – paragraph 1
1. At the initiative of the Commission, the Funds may support preparatory, monitoring, control, audit, evaluation, communication including corporate communication on the political priorities of the Union, visibility and all administrative and technical assistance actions necessary for the implementation of this Regulation and, where appropriate with third countries. Where necessary, they may support measures to build and strengthen administrative capacities to manage funds efficiently and to enhance capacities for project management.
Amendment 1273 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Member State shall determine the composition of the monitoring committee and shall ensure a balanced representation of the relevant Member State authorities and intermediate bodies and of representatives of the partners referred to in Article 6.
Amendment 1276 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 34 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Representatives of the EIB may participate in the work of the monitoring committee in an advisory capacity.
Amendment 1277 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) the procedures for accessing the funds, application guides, relevant national legislation, and proposals for simplification measures for beneficiaries;
Amendment 1419 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1
Article 55 – paragraph 1
1. Support from the Funds to financial instruments invested in final recipients as well as any type of income generated by those investments, which are attributable to the support from the Funds, may be used for differentiated treatment of investors operating under the market economy principle or of other forms of Union support, through an appropriate sharing of risks and profits.
Amendment 1473 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 63 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Article 63 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Member Stated shall make arrangements for ensuring the effective examination of complaints and questions concerning the Funds. They shall, upon request by the Commission, examine complaints and questions submitted to the Commission falling within the scope of their programmes and shall inform the Commission of the results of those examinations.
Amendment 1489 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 64 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 64 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall satisfy itself that Member States have management and control systems that comply with this Regulation and that those systems function effectively during the implementation of the programmes. The Commission shall draw up for all Member States an audit strategy and an audit plan which shall be based on a risk-assessment.
Amendment 1596 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 73 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The ERDF and ESF+ Regulation may set out specific provisions for programmes under Article [4(1)(c)(vii)] of the ESF+ Regulation.
Amendment 1606 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 75 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 75 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 1610 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 75 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 75 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
The audit authority shall not carry out audits at the level of the EIB,EIF or other international financial institutions in which a Member State is a shareholder, for financial instruments implemented by them.
Amendment 1772 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 91 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 91 – paragraph 1 – point e
Amendment 1778 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 97 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Where a programme is subject to financial correction, corrections shall not be applied to beneficiaries which have implemented the projects without errors.
Amendment 1849 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 104 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The amount of resources available for the ESF+ under the Investment for jobs and growth goal shall be EUR 88 646 194 590decided at Member State level, taking into account the socio economic situation at national, regional and local level as well as the investment needs of Member States and regions.
Amendment 1874 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 7
Article 104 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 7
As of 1 January 20246, resources transferred to the CEF which have not been committed to a transport infrastructure project shall be made available to all Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund to finance transport infrastructure projects in accordance with Regulation (EU) [the new CEF Regulation].
Amendment 1883 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 7
Article 104 – paragraph 7
7. Resources for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) shall amount to 2.53 % of the global resources available for budgetary commitment from the Funds for the period 2021-2027 (i.e. a total of EUR 8 430 000 000).
Amendment 1919 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) 7085 % for the less developed regions;
Amendment 1940 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) 565 % for the transition regions;
Amendment 1948 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) 450 % for the more developed regions.
Amendment 1973 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
The co-financing rate for the Cohesion Fund at the level of each priority shall not be higher than 7085 %.
Amendment 1995 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 106 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
The co-financing rate for Interreg programmes shall be no higher than 7085 %.
Amendment 2004 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 111 a (new)
Article 111 a (new)
Article 111 a State Aid Rules The operational programmes related to the policy objective Smarter Europe, when providing financial support to SMEs, shall not be subject to State Aid rules in order to ensure common rules with Horizon programme.
Amendment 31 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates its consistently held view of the importance of cross-border initiatives for growth; notes with regret that the Commission’s proposals provide for a significant reduction in the financing of Interreg; considers that a level of funding equal at the very least to the 2014-2020 envelope, in constant prices, needs to be programmed under the 2021-2027 MFF; in order to ensure a sufficient funding for existing programmes and for the new initiative 'Interregional Innovative Investments' inside Interreg;
Amendment 32 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates its consistently held view of the importance of cross-border initiatives for growth and balanced development; takes into account the fact that cross-border cooperation programmes are among the EU’s most successful funding instruments; notes with regret that the Commission’s proposals provide for a significant reduction in the financing of Interreg; considers that a level of funding equal at the very least to the 2014-2020 envelope, in constant prices, needs to be programmed under the 2021-2027 MFF;
Amendment 42 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that lower EU co-financing rates might result in difficulties for beneficiaries in the regions to access EU funding, especially in the less developed Member States and those characterised by a high degree of centralisation, which is why regions and local authorities have had difficulties in funding projects; for these reasons, the existing co-financing rates should be maintained;
Amendment 57 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes the continuation of the link between EU budget and sound economic governance and the introduction of the rule of law mechanism;
Amendment 29 #
2018/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The establishment of a single competent authority at national level integrating all permit granting procedures (one-stop shop) should reduce the complexity, lower the cost, improve the efficiency and increase the transparency and the speed of adoption of the procedures. It should also enhance the cooperation between Member States where appropriate. The procedures should promote a real cooperation between investors and the single competent authority and should therefore allow for the scoping in the pre-application phase of the permit granting procedure. Such scoping should be integrated in the detailed application outline and follow the procedure set out in Article 5(2) of 2011/92/EU, as amended by Directive 2014/52/EU.
Amendment 30 #
2018/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Given the urgency tof completeing the TEN-T core network, the simplification of permit granting procedures should be accompanied by a time limit within which competent authorities responsible should make a comprehensive decision regarding the construction of the project. This time limit should stimulate aensure more efficient handling of procedures and should, under no circumstances, compromise the Union's high standards for environmental protection and public participation.
Amendment 33 #
2018/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Cross-border TEN-T infrastructure projects face particular challenges as regards the coordination of permit granting procedures. The European Coordinators, assisted by local and regional authorities, should be empowered to monitor these procedures and facilitate their synchronisation and completion.
Amendment 34 #
2018/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Public procurement in cross-border projects of common interest should be conducted in accordance with the Treaty and Directives 2014/25/EU and/or 2014/24/EU. In order to ensure the efficient completion of the cross-border core network projects of common interest, public procurement carried out by a joint entity should be subject to a single national legislation. By way of derogation from the Union public procurement legislation, the applicable national rules should in principle be those of the Member State where the joint entity has its registered office. It should remain possible to define, or the applicable legislation should be defined in an intergovernmental agreement.
Amendment 41 #
2018/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. To ensure fast and efficient administrative procedures related to projects of common interest, project promoters and all authorities concerned shall ensure that the most rapid treatment legally possible is given to these projects, including as regards the resources allocated.
Amendment 49 #
2018/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point b – point i v
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point b – point i v
(iv) major milestones to be accomplished and their deadlines in view of the comprehensive decision to be taken, and the overall scheduled time-frame;
Amendment 50 #
2018/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The European Coordinator referred to in Article 45 of Regulation (EU)² No 1315/2013 and representatives of the local and regional authorities shall be empowered to closely follow the permit granting procedure for cross-border projects of common interest and to facilitate contacts between the involved competent authorities involved.
Amendment 25 #
2017/2285(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas smart, sustainable and fully interconnected transport, energy and digital networks are a necessary condition for the completion and smooth operation of the European single market and for linking Europe with the world market; whereas these are genuine arteries for European economic growth, strengthening cohesion and the wellbeing of its citizens;
Amendment 36 #
2017/2285(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF), the Cohesion Fund (CF) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) should remain, in the next programming period, the core EU sources for transport infrastructure investments under the thematic objective of ‘promoting sustainable transport and removing bottlenecks in key network infrastructures’; proposes that, due to the high European added value and the extensive spill-over effects generated, these funding sources should remain available for all eligible EU regions;
Amendment 44 #
2017/2285(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the intervention logic behind EU transport infrastructure investment should remain a well-balanced construction of centrally managed and shared management sources in order to address policy and funding needs; recalls that the CEF aims to address centrally the EU-wide priority of TEN-T corridors, including safety and environmental aspects; recalls also that the ERDF and CF have a strong regional dimension that responds to local demandregional and local needs and they support the connectivity to TEN-T and mobility through secondary and tertiary nodes and multimodal terminals; underlines, in this context, that the relevant budgetary envelopes for the three funding sources need to be strengthened in an even manner in order to avoid asymmetric distribution of investment between the levels;
Amendment 56 #
2017/2285(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the role of additional sources such as the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) and financial instruments needs to be defined in view of their complementarity to the ERDF and CF and their additionality to EIB lending operations; notes in this regard that EFSI should serve as a platform for public- private partnerships (PPPs) in matching financial instruments to private investment and to national/regional financing at project level; notes that the support available through the EU guarantee should be provided to bankable infrastructure projects which would not otherwise be supported through the ERDF, CF or CEF;
Amendment 63 #
2017/2285(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that infrastructure requires objective quantification of demand and justified needs prior to setting the budget and the delivery methods; underlines that it should be possible for the ERDF and CF eligibility criteria to consider existing demand at NUTS 3 level;
Amendment 77 #
2017/2285(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for the creation of an EU transport infrastructure index as an additional eligibility criterion in order to accurately reflect regional and local demand; proposes that the index help determine the overall envelope of investments as well as the co-financing rates; suggests that the EU transport scoreboard could be the basis for the proposed index with complementary elements such as road safety, regional and local specifics and environmental impact, which could contribute to the accuracy of the assessments;
Amendment 83 #
2017/2285(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Expresses the view that the less developed regions with negative demographic trends, a serious lack of transport infrastructure, which is a basic requirement for economic development, or remote ones with low accessibility should be targeted more intensively by ERDF and CF transport infrastructure investments, while additional sources and delivery methods should be expanded in the transition and more developed regions;
Amendment 95 #
2017/2285(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 105 #
2017/2285(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls for facilitating preparations for and implementing transport infrastructure projects under the EU cross-border cooperation programmes that are being implemented with candidate countries and other European neighbourhood countries in support of their European integration processes;
Amendment 111 #
2017/2285(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Calls on the Member States to better implement the EU macro-regional strategies for priority transport infrastructure connections and to ensure the deeper involvement of the regional and local authorities in their implementation;
Amendment 112 #
2017/2285(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Calls for the resolution of cross- border transport bottlenecks between Member States on regional transport routes that are characterised by daily migration and that have a clear seasonal or tourism-related character;
Amendment 9 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas cohesion policy aims to promote harmonious development of the whole Union, leading to a strengthening of its economic, social and territorial cohesion, in a spirit of solidarity and with the aim of promoting growth, and reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions;
Amendment 14 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas cohesion policy aims to promote harmonious and balanced development of the whole Union, leading to a strengthening of its economic, social and territorial cohesion, in a spirit of solidarity and with the aim of promoting growth, and reducing the backwardness of the least favoured regions;
Amendment 23 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the 7th Cohesion Report draws attention to the diversity of regions and territories, including within current categories of regions, owing to their specific circumstances (ultraperipherality, sparse population, low income, low growth, etc.), making a tailored approach essential;
Amendment 24 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the 7th Cohesion Report draws attention to the significant diversity of regions and territories, including within current categories of regions, owing to their specific circumstances (ultraperipherality, low income, low growth, etc.), making a tailored approach essential;
Amendment 43 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers it crucial that cohesion policy should continue to cover all European regions, regardless of their level of development, and remain the European Union’s main investment instrument in the future programming period, with a budget commensurate with the challenges;
Amendment 68 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Reiterates its commitment to shared management and the principles of partnership and subsidiarity, which contribute to the added value generated by cohesion policy; stresses that the added value of this policy stems primarily from its ability to take account of the needs and specificities of eachindividual regions and local territoryies and to bring the European Union closer to its citizens;
Amendment 76 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that European added value is also reflected in European territorial cooperation, in all its dimensions; calls for an increase in its share of the budget allocated to cohesion policy, whilmore effective implementation of programmes, the simplification of the procedure, and the implementation of specific projects, while at the same time improving coordination between different programmes to avoid overlaps;
Amendment 77 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that European added value is alsostrongly reflected in European territorial cooperation,; in all its dimensions (cross-border, transnational, interregional co-operation); calls for an increase in its share of the budget allocated to cohesion policy, while improving coordination between different programmes to avoid overlaps;
Amendment 105 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses the importance of cross- border cooperation for better social cohesion between cross-border regions and local communities in the Member States;
Amendment 106 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Calls for the continued implementation of the cross-border territorial cooperation programmes with candidate countries and other neighbouring countries in order to support their European aspirations and strengthen their European integration process;
Amendment 110 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Reminds that the permanent natural and demographic situation of the northernmost regions (sparse population, cold climate, long distances to European markets) justifies specific measures in accordance with Article 174 TFEU; stresses the need to secure and extend the specific allocation for these regions in order to promote unions overall harmonious development and to enable inhabitants of the northernmost Europe to take full advantage of their regions specific characteristics;
Amendment 112 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Recalls the role of EU macro- regional strategies and their potential in the better implementation of the territorial dimension in cohesion policy;
Amendment 148 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses that social and fiscal convergence help to foster cohesion while improving the functioning of the single market; takes the view that divergent practices in this area, as well as the unequal conditions experienced by individual regions, may run counter to the objective of cohesion and are liable to cause further problems for territories which are lagging behind or are the most vulnerable to globalisation; considers that cohesion policy could contribute to the promotion of social and fiscal convergence by providing incentives; calls on the Commission to take better account of this aspect in the European Semester;
Amendment 160 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Supports a strong thematic concentration on a limited number of priorities linked to major European political objectives, leaving managing authorities the task of drawing up their territorial strategies on the basis of their needs and different potentials, and the regions where results can be achieved; stresses that employment, innovation, support for SMEs, climate change and the circular economy should constitute priority areas for cohesion policy in future;
Amendment 179 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Welcomes the adoption of the European Pillar for Social Rights, which represents a step forward in building a social Europe; reiterates its commitment toAcknowledges steps taken towards more social Europe; welcomes instruments such as the ESF, the Youth Guarantee and the Youth Employment Initiative in view of their role in meeting the challenges of employment, social inclusion, learning and vocational training;
Amendment 239 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Calls for strengthening capacities ,where necessary, for the management of cohesion policy at national level in the Member States, with technical support from the Commission in order to ensure the more effective use of the available funds;
Amendment 251 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Points out the unequal conditions faced by potential beneficiaries of cohesion policy resources at the regional and local levels in several Member States resulting from the insufficient application of the subsidiarity principle, unequal degrees of decentralisation and different financial capacities, which may determine whether they are able to use cohesion policy funds effectively;
Amendment 272 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. NPoints out that the efficiency of governance varies substantially in Member States; notes that the quality of public administration is a decisive factor in regional growth and the effectiveness of ESI funds; emphasises the need to increase administrative capacities;
Amendment 278 #
2017/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Supports a shift in cohesion policy towards a greater focus on results and on content as opposed to form, moving away from an accounting-based approach towards one which focuses on performance and allowing managing authorities more flexibility as to how to achieve targets;
Amendment 13 #
2017/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the special EU programmes for Northern Ireland, includingespecially the Northern Ireland Peace Programme, are of key importance for the continuing peace process, as they foster inter-community and cross-border contacts; notes that cross-community and cross- border social hubs and shared services are particularly important in this regard;
Amendment 17 #
2017/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Sees that cross-community trust- building measures and measures for a peaceful coexistence, such as shared spaces and support networks, have played a key role in the peace process, as shared spaces allow the two communities in Northern Ireland to come together for joint activities, thereby helping to heal the divide;
Amendment 25 #
2017/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Is if the opinion, nevertheless, that more couldmust be done to increase general awareness of the impact of EU funding in Northern Ireland, in particular by informing the general public about the impact of EU-funded projects for the peace process and the general economic development of the region;
Amendment 28 #
2017/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Believes it desirablethat it should be considered that, even post- 2020, Northern Ireland should be able to continue to participate in the EU’s general cohesion funds if possible, as that would benefit economic and social development, particularly in disadvantaged and rural areas; joint co- financing from the EU and the UK should be considered if necessary;
Amendment 37 #
2017/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that, post-2020, EU- supported territorial cooperation programmes, especially cross-border and inter- community schemes should be continued; stresses that the continuance of the special EU cohesion programmes for Northern Ireland, namely the Northern Ireland Peace Programme and the Interreg programmes, are particularly important for the stability of the region; fears that an end to these programmes would endanger cross-border and inter-community trust- building activities and, as a consequence, the peace process;
Amendment 47 #
2017/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to promote the Northern Irish experience with cohesion funding, especially with the PEACE Programme, as an example of how the EU wants to address inter- community conflicts;
Amendment 49 #
2017/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. believes that the good practices of the PEACE Programme should be taken as the EU model for overcoming mistrust between conflicting communities and achieving lasting peace in other parts of Europe, especially in the Western Balkans;
Amendment 1 #
2017/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
Citation 1
– having regard to the Treaty on European Union (TEU), in particular Article 3, and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in particular Articles 4, 11, 174 to 178, 191 and 349 thereof,
Amendment 17 #
2017/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas cohesion policy offers not only investment opportunities to respond to regional and local needs through the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds), but also an integrated policy framework to helpreduce developmental disparities between the European regions and to help them address the multiple challenges to their development, including through support for resource efficiency and sustainable development, as well as territorial cooperation and capacity building;
Amendment 50 #
2017/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises the importance of applying waste hierarchy as a prerequisite for achieving a circular economy; furthermore recognises a negative trend of investment of ESI Funds into lower levels of the waste hierarchy, in particular mechanical biological treatment (MBT) facilities and incineration, which canin some cases leads to overcapacities and long-term technological lock-in, thus jeopardising the achievement of EU recycling targets;
Amendment 55 #
2017/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the importance of the partnership principle and the important role of all stakeholders, in particular regional and local authorities and the non- governmental sector, during the drawing up of partnership agreements and operational programmes; calls for a genuine involvement of partners in policy processes, and for circular economy-related objectives to be adequately incorporated into programming documents;
Amendment 65 #
2017/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that projects related to the circular economy which have received cohesion policy support have brought greater benefits to more developed regions; therefore encourages national authorities responsible for programming and less developed regions to increase their efforts to achieve technological leapfrogging by implementing more projects that meet circular economy principles;
Amendment 78 #
2017/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for better access to finance for regional and local authorities to enable investments in green jobs and in local energy transition, including energy efficiency, decentralised distribution of energy and the circular economy;
Amendment 86 #
2017/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the national and regional authorities in charge of preparing operational programmes to more closely integrate the circular economy into territorial cooperation programmes, particularly in cross-border cooperation programmes, in order to implement cross- border solutions that can generate more efficient and cheaper results.
Amendment 88 #
2017/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Believes that the future planning of ESI Funds in the next programming period should be better integrated with the national energy and climate plans for 2030;
Amendment 93 #
2017/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls for the inclusion of circular economy projects in territorial cooperation programmes with countries in the European neighbourhood in order to help them to prepare for the European integration process.
Amendment 97 #
2017/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Emphasises the underexploited potential of macro- regional strategies to help achieve a circular economy, not only in the Member States but also in third countries located in the same geographical area; stresses that those strategies could support the creation of a market for secondary raw materials for the Union;
Amendment 107 #
2017/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Encourages regional and local authorities to further invest in education and awareness raising about the benefits and advantages of all actions with the aim of implementing the circular economy through cohesion policy projects, thus increasing citizen participation and influencing consumer behaviour; underlines, in this connection, the potential of the European Social Fund;
Amendment 11 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the protracted economic crisis in the EU has adversely affected economic growth at regional level, despite the fact that cohesion policy has contributed significantly to boosting growth and employment and reducing disparities between EU regions;
Amendment 14 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the principal objective of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF) and the Cohesion Fund for the period 2014-2020 is investment in growth and employment with a view to strengthening the labour market, regional economies and European regional cooperation and, improving cross-border, transnational and interregional cooperation within the Union, and ultimately reducing development disparities between individual regions of Europe;
Amendment 24 #
2017/2208(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Takes the view that agriculture is, the agrifood sector and rural entrepreneurship are part of the solution for enhancing sustainable growth, providing jobs and increasing levels of income in lagging regions, while at the same time helping to preserve the countryside and combat rural depopulation;
Amendment 28 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas lagging regions have serious infrastructural shortcomingsshortcomings in terms of public transport, economic and energy infrastructure, and are in need of targeted investments to ensure that they are used more effectively and are more accessible;
Amendment 31 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas mass departures from lagging regions, especially on the part of young people and skilled labour, are making them less attractive in terms of employment and threatening them with permanent depopulation and long-term developmental lags;
Amendment 34 #
2017/2208(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the importance of rural development funds in boosting the competitiveness of those regions through tailor-made projects based on bottom-up approaches; acknowledges, therefore, the input of local action groups in developing local strategies, supporting stakeholder networking and the appraisal and approval of individual LEADER projects; underlines the importance of knowledge transfer and providing lagging regions with easier access to agricultural innovations;
Amendment 39 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas it is important to raise awareness among end-users of EU-funded regional and local programmes and the results achieved, regardless of funding levels in any specific region;
Amendment 41 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas the efficient public services contribute significantly to ensuringcreating the conditions for economic growth in lagging regions;
Amendment 58 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that cohesion policy plays a key role in ensuring investment in all EU regions, especially in lagging regions, and in reducing development disparities;
Amendment 58 #
2017/2208(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Reiterates the importance of digitaliszation, circular bio-economy and of improving infrastructure, thus creating a positive environment and good foundation for boosting growth and enhancing cohesion in lagging regions; recalls that good infrastructure, especially the provision of high-speed internet connections helps keep people in rural areas and can help attract a high-calibre workforce needed for growth in those areas;
Amendment 70 #
2017/2208(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Underlines that the future agreements on structural funding should take into account support for lagging regions while bearing in mind the need for continued financing for all EU regions, as the impacts of globalisation, climate change and industrial transition are not limited to less developed regions, as presented in European Commission´s 7th Cohesion report, but also significantly affect, for instance, sparsely populated areas.
Amendment 73 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that unemployment, particularly among the most vulnerable groups, such as women and young people, remains dramatically high and represents one of the most serious and pressing problems in lagging regions; stresses the fundamental role of education and traisecondary and higher education, professional training and lifelong learning in combating the particularly alarming unemployment and departure levels among young people in these regions;
Amendment 78 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the presence of a properly educated and trained workforce that matches the needs of the economy has a powerful impact on competitiveness, productivity and the attractiveness of the labour market;
Amendment 87 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Hopes that, in implementing the 2020 education and training strategy and its objectives, account will be taken of existing situations in lagging regions, in particular the early departure rates and their adverse impact on employment;
Amendment 95 #
2017/2208(INI)
7a. Stresses the need for structural reforms in countries and regions with development problems as a prerequisite for better outcomes for investments made under cohesion policy programmes;
Amendment 98 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Points out that decentralisation and the application of the principle of subsidiarity in underdeveloped Member States can be a significant factor in stimulating economic development in underdeveloped regions, and particularly in lagging regions;
Amendment 108 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Stresses the detrimental effects of recentralisation on regions in countries affected by austerity policies, as it exacerbates the development conditions in lagging regions;
Amendment 121 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Points out that tax policy needs to create more favourable conditions for investment and the running of businesses in lagging regions;
Amendment 129 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that, with regard to cohesion policies and other Union policies, any conditionality should be centred on fundamental values, coexistence and, solidarity rather than onand achieving social and economic cohesion goals, in addition to macroeconomic parameters;
Amendment 150 #
2017/2208(INI)
18a. Considers that streamlining the rules and introducing greater flexibility in the use of cohesion policy instruments would help improve the absorption of funds, especially in lagging regions;
Amendment 151 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Points out that, when preparing operational programmes, the national authorities of the Member States should pay particular attention to lagging regions;
Amendment 152 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18c. Cross-Border Cooperation programmes should be tailored, inter alia, to meet the needs of lagging regions, which are often located in border zones where there are insufficient infrastructure connections;
Amendment 158 #
2017/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission to recognise the role played by cohesion policy as an essentialimportant European economic policy instrument to promote investments that take into account the specific economic, social and territorial characteristics of the regions; stresses that such investment should therefore be exempt from the budgetary constraints of the Stability Pact, especially in lagging regions, where they promote growth, employment and improvement of the macro-economic framework throughout the EU;
Amendment 46 #
2017/2191(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that, in general, competition policy only defends consumers’ interests, but does not take account of agricultural producers’ specific interests and difficulties; believes that a true level playing field should be ensured, while promoting transparency for market participants;
Amendment 62 #
2017/2191(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Amendment 74 #
2017/2191(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Member States and the EU Institutions to prioritise the strengthening of the post-Brexit single market by ensuring full compliance with EU competition laws and other standards, ensure legal certainty, and by harmonising tax issues between Member States;
Amendment 24 #
2017/2136(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Encourages the Commission to keep moving towards a single audit scheme, that would allow for a reduction in administrative burden at all levels brought by controls, while maintaining efficient control on the legality and regularity of payments;
Amendment 30 #
2017/2136(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Reiterates the request of the European Parliament of 8 September 2015 (Resolution A8-0240/2015) that the Commission, the Member States and the Court of Auditors further develop risk- based audit strategies factoring in all relevant data;
Amendment 107 #
2017/2128(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need to encourage work sharing between Member States by fostering the availability and use of harmonised methodology and models to conduct evaluations, while reducing the existence of unnecessary additional national requirements;
Amendment 7 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 a (new)
Citation 14 a (new)
- having regard to The Bratislava Declaration of 16 September 2016,
Amendment 11 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that the rules-based international order and the values defended by liberal democracies, and the peace, prosperity and freedoms which this order guarantees and which correspond to the foundations on which the European Union is built, are facing unprecedented challenges as societal, economic, technological and geopolitical trends point to the growing vulnerability of the world's population to shocks and stresses, including: interstate conflicts, natural disasters, extreme weather events, water crises, state collapse and cyber-attacks; acknowledges that the defence of the rules-based international order and the values defended by liberal democracies should be of the outmost priority and should be approached without compromise;
Amendment 24 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Deplores the fact that terrorist and criminal organisations are proliferating and instability is spreading in the South and Middle East, as fragile and disintegrating states throw upgive up on large ungoverned spaces; stresses that in the East Russia’s war against Ukraine and illegal annexation of Crimea continue; is deeply concerned that hybrid tactics, including cyberterrorism and, information warfare and economic and energy blackmail, are destabilising the Eastern Partnership countries and the wWestern Balkans countries, as well as targeting Western democracies and increasing tensions within them; is concerned that the security environment surrounding the EU will remain highly volatile for years to come; is firmly convinced that EU's vulnerability is direct outcome of the lack of integration as well as lack of coordination;
Amendment 59 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Believes strongly that whenever necessary, the European Union needs to take its destiny into its own hands; stresses that the framing of a common defence policy referred to in Article 42 TEU has the objective of establishing common defence and endowing the Union with strategic autonomy and freedom of action in promoting and defending peace, security and progress in Europe and in the world; emphasises practical and financial benefits of further integrations of European defence capabilities;
Amendment 64 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Believes that European Defence should be built upon the principle that European security cannot be guaranteed by relying merely on military assets, but only by a comprehensive use of civilian, developmental, diplomatic, economic and military instruments available to the Union;
Amendment 70 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the visible progress made in framing a stronger European defence since the adoption of the EU Global Strategy in June 2016; welcomes in particular the suggestion forlaunching of a European Defence Fund, the proposed scaling-up of the Preparatory Action on Defence Research, and the legislative proposal for a European Defence Industrial Development Programme (EDIDP);
Amendment 76 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Highlights that the Commission and an increasing number of Member States have committed themselves to launching the European Defence Union; underlines that this corresponds to Parliament’s long- standing demand and to numerous appeals expressed in its previous resolutions; highlights the greater efficiency, elimination of duplication and reduction of costs that will result from stronger European defence integration; stresses however that the launch of a real EDU requires continued political will and determination;
Amendment 88 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the VP/HR and the Commission to act upon Parliament’s calls for an EU Security and Defence White Book in the context of preparing the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), as requested in Parliament’s resolutions of 23 November 2016, 22 November 2016 and 16 March 2017; considers that building the Defence Union, linking the Union’s strategic orientation with EU contributions to capability development and shaping the European institutional framework for defence are elements that need to be underpinned by an interinstitutional agreement; underlines that through comprehensive and trustworthy work of all stakeholders, it is possible to increase the scope and efficiency of defence spending without the increase of defence spending itself;
Amendment 115 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Urges Council to take concrete steps towards the harmonisation and standardisation of the European armed forces, in accordance with Article 42(2), in order to facilitate the cooperation of armed forces personnel under the umbrella of a new European Defence Union as a step in progressive framing of a common Union defence policy;
Amendment 116 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9 b. Stresses that the use of all possibilities provided for in the Treaty would improve competitiveness and functioning of the defence industry in the single market, further stimulate defence cooperation through positive incentives, and targeting projects that Member States are not able to undertake, reducing unnecessary duplication, and promoting a more efficient use of public money;is of the opinion that the outputs of these strategic cooperative programmes have great potential to be dual-use technologies and as such bring extra added value to Member States;emphasises on development of European capabilities and an integrated defence market;
Amendment 118 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9 c. Urges the establishment of precise and binding guidelines to provide a well- defined framework for future activation and implementation of Article 42(7) TEU;
Amendment 119 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 d (new)
Paragraph 9 d (new)
9 d. Calls for the formation of the European Intelligence Agency with the mission and capability to implement a de facto transversal intelligence network within the Member States allowing the European Union to react in a comprehensive and coordinated way to emerging threats by adhering to Article 24(3) and Article 4(3) TEU, as the comprehensive gathering of intelligence information cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, either at central level or at regional and local level, but can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Union level (Article 5(3));
Amendment 128 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Notes that through Brexit, the EU is losing 25 percent of its military capabilities and will no longer benefit from the UK's expertise;is concerned that after Brexit, 80 percent of NATO's defence spending will be provided by non- European countries;welcomes in this regard the increased defence spending of different EU member states since 2014;stresses the importance of continued close defence and security relations after Brexit;notes however that Brexit is a renewed momentum to initiatives that have been long blocked, and could open the door to new proposals;
Amendment 130 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Urges the Parliament to turn its Subcommittee on Security and Defence into a fully-fledged parliamentary committee, enabling it to have a prominent role in the implementation of the common security and defence policy and particularly a role in the scrutiny of legal acts related to the security and defence;
Amendment 132 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10 b. Believes that decision-making on CSDP issues could be more democratic and transparent;calls in this regard for Parliament to gain greater powers of scrutiny and accountability over CSDP;considers in this regard that the sub-committee on Security and Defence (SEDE) should become a fully-fledged parliamentary committee;
Amendment 133 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 c (new)
Paragraph 10 c (new)
10 c. Regrets the lack of cooperation and information-sharing among security and intelligence services in Europe;believes that more cooperation between intelligence services could help counter terrorism;calls in this regard for the establishment of a fully-fledged European intelligence system;
Amendment 150 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Encourages the Member States participating in PESCO to set up a permanent 'European Integrated Force' composed of divisions of their national armies and to make it available to the Union for the implementation of the common security and defence policy as foreseen by Article 42(3) TEU;
Amendment 180 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines that the proposed DG Defence should work in liaison with the European Defence Agency (EDA); considers that the EDA should be the implementing agency for Union actions under the European Capabilities and Armaments policy, where this is foreseen by the Lisbon Treaty; renews its call on the Council to ensure that the administrative and operational expenditure of the EDA is funded from the Union budget; notes that EDA's increasing new roles and responsibilities should be followed by an increase of budget;
Amendment 193 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Welcomes the establishment of the Coordinated Annual Review on Defence (CARD) process; considers that CARD should aim at bringing the armed forces into line with each other through standardisation and harmonisation, ensuring the Union’s strategic autonomy, and allowing Member States to invest more and better in defence together; welcomes the proposal to launch a trial run in 2017;
Amendment 232 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the recent establishment of a nucleus for a permanent EU operational headquarters (MPCC - Military Planning and Conduct Capability), as demanded by Parliament in its resolution of 12 September 2013, as it is a precondition for effective planning, command and control of common operations; calls on the Member States to staff it with adequate personnel in order to make it work;
Amendment 254 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the Member States to apply full burden-sharing to military CSDP missions by enlargingprogressive enlargement of common funding toward full common funding, which should enable and encourage more Member States to contribute their capabilities and forces or just funds; underlines the importance of reviewing the Athena mechanism in this regard and of substantially broadening the common cost financing;
Amendment 257 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27 a. Urges the Council to act in accordance with Article 41(3) TEU and to adopt without delay the decision of establishing a start-up fund for the urgent financing of the initial phases of military operations for the tasks referred to in Article 42(1) and Article 43 TEU;urges the Council to resolve current problems with financing hybrid missions;calls for more flexibility in the EU's financial rules in order to support its ability to respond to crises and for the implementation of existing Lisbon Treaty provisions;
Amendment 265 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Believes that the EU-NATO Joint Declaration has the potential to move cooperation to a higher level; welcomes the common set of 42 proposals aimed at strengthening both cooperation and coordination between the two organisations; also welcomes the first joint implementation report by the two organisations published in June 2017; welcomes the progress made in the implementation of the common set of proposals and calls for continued progress;
Amendment 272 #
2017/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. CStresses that European security still relies exclusively on NATO; notes in this regard that a stronger EU and stronger NATO are mutually reinforcing; considers that the EU needs to increase its efforts to act as a regional security provider, and to become a strong European pillar of NATO through the European Defence Union; considers that the EU should take greater responsibility in security crises in its neighbourhood, thereby relieving her allies within NATO and allowing them to concentrate on their own neighbourhood; is of the opinion that the security and protection of Europe will increasingly depend on both organisations; calls for improving cooperation, inter alia concerning the exchange of information, expertise and intelligence;
Amendment 17 #
2017/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that Member States must change their mentality from a national to a European perspective, as the most effective solution to protect Europe from increased threats is common EU action; is concerned about the EU’s security architecture, which remains fragile in the face of continued and fresh challenges every day and in which a ‘hybrid peace’ has become an unsatisfactory reality; urges the Member States to take action and fulfil the wishes of those European citizens who have repeatedly stressed that EU foreign and security policy is the most important and most necessary of all EU policies;
Amendment 88 #
2017/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only a joint soft power with credible hard power can confront major security challenges, notably the refugee crisis, terrorism, conflicts in the Eastern and Southern neighbourhoods, proxy wars and hybrid warfare, and challenging assertive behaviour by Russia and China; takes the view that it is necessary to tackle the root causes of instability and of forced and irregular migration, namely poverty, the lack of economic opportunities, the lack of access to education, armed conflicts, bad governance and climate change;
Amendment 197 #
2017/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Reiterates the need for a strategic refocus on the Western Balkans, giving a fresh impetus to EU enlargement policy and strengthening the rule of law and the resilience of state institutions and economy; is convinced that regional reconciliation and integration throughin the EU and the transatlantic institutional architecture is the best means to address the dangers stemming from destabilising foreign interference, organised crime, unresolved major state disputes, disinformation and hybrid threats;
Amendment 282 #
2017/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the VP/HR, the Commission and the Member States to step up their efforts to increase the EU’s ability to confront hybrid threats; calls, in this regard, for the development of joint, comprehensive risk and vulnerability analysis capacities and methods and, for bolstering the EU’s strategic communication capabilities, and for establishment of the European Intelligence Agency with the mission and capability to implement a de facto transversal intelligence network within the Member States allowing the European Union to react in a comprehensive and coordinated way to emerging threats;
Amendment 317 #
2017/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses the role of independent media in promoting cultural diversity and intercultural competences, and the need to strengthen such media as a source of credible information, especially in the EU and its neighbourhood, and to further strengthen the EU’s capacity to fight fake news and disinformation, especially through the East StratCom Task Force; highlights in this context the need to develop stronger resilience at EU level against such information spread over the Internet; calls on the Commission to coordinate better with the EEAS on those issues;
Amendment 356 #
2017/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Believes that Europe must build a virtuous alliance between the private and public sectors and should develop a strategic relationship with the US;
Amendment 137 #
2017/2117(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to step up support for innovationve production methods and technologies with the aim to strength sheep sector’s competitiveness and the promotion of sheep- and goatmeat in the internal market, emphasising not only traditional products, but also newer cuts marketed to younger consumersin order to offer products that correspond to consumer expectations and market demand;
Amendment 262 #
2017/2117(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Believes it necessary to improve the bargaining power of producers in the food chain, extending rules on contractual relations for the sheep-and goat-farming by establishing producer organisations similar to those existing in other crop and livestock sectors, in line with the agreement reached as part of the Omnibus Regulation, in order to improve the competitiveness and current low productivity of the sector;
Amendment 300 #
2017/2117(INI)
12. Calls for consideration to be given to the precarious situation of sheep and goat farmers when entering into further trade agreements with third countries by including their products among sensitive sectors, and excluding any provisions that mightin order not to compromise the European model of production in any way;
Amendment 3 #
2017/2115(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the beekeeping sector is an integral part of European agriculture, providingnotes that over 50620 000 EU1a citizens with their main income or additional earnings; are beekeepers, but only few make a living out of it; _________________ 1a https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/honey_en
Amendment 113 #
2017/2115(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
Recital M a (new)
Ma. whereas the reconstruction of lost bee colonies also requires honey and that honey production is essentially a matter of weather conditions; warm and moist weather promotes the honey production, while cold and wet at the same time impedes it;
Amendment 310 #
2017/2115(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to involve all relevant drugmedicament producers in research into bee drugmedicaments and to set up a common IT platform to share best solutions and drugsmedicine with interested parties; and calls for research on biological and physical alternative methods f.e. formic acid;
Amendment 4 #
2017/2084(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the transport sector holds enormous potential and should play a vital role in the transition towards new energy solutions and a low-carbon society; whereas, in order to do so, advanced storage solutions and infrastructure, as well as digital innovation are needed to support new transport and tourism businesses, SMEs and smart mobility services;
Amendment 31 #
2017/2084(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes the major efforts being made under the EU’s Horizon 2020 research and development programme to support the decarbonisation of transport; calls on the Commission, in future, to focus the available funding more clearly on developing advanced biofuels, increasing the share of rail transport in overall EU transport performance and promoting cycling for everyone as a daily transport mode, as well as on interconnected strategic priorities, such as electromobility and integrated urban transport, with particular attention ton energy efficiency, air pollution and noise reduction;
Amendment 52 #
2017/2084(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the need to share and scale up best practices and smart, sustainable and inclusive urban projects; calls for an integrated and coordinated approach to take account of the urban dimension of EU and national policies and legislation in order to improve the quality of life in urban areas; calls on the Commission and Member States to enable existing rural businesses to connect, integrate and cooperate better with urban based models;
Amendment 1 #
2017/2071(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines the EIB’s important role in the implementation of cohesion policy through activities aimed at strengthening project preparation capacities, consultancy and analysis services and loanas mentioned in the Article 309 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in supporting projects for developing less developed regions and projects which have a cross fborder national co-financing;ure by complementing the Structural Funds.
Amendment 10 #
2017/2071(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the EIB to present an additional special chapter in its annual report dedicated to EIB activities aimed at the implementation of cohesion policy including Interreg related activities by Member States, and to include detailed information on the use of loans and financial instruments in cohesion policy projects and programmes;
Amendment 19 #
2017/2071(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Highlights the importance of the EIB in complementary financing cohesion policy objectives as well as its advisory role through activities aimed at strengthening project preparation capacities, financial and technical advice for local and regional authorities and support in developing financial instruments. as well as loans for national co-financing of ESI Funds.
Amendment 26 #
2017/2071(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the EIB, as an institution through which the EU finances projects aimed at fulfilling EU policies, should contribute to economic, social and territorial cohesion; notices however that, according to the geographical breakdown of lending by country in which projects are located, five Member States received 54.11 % of the total loans granted in 2016; Moreover, more efforts should be made by the EIB to cope with Article 309 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and strengthening its support for less developed regions.
Amendment 34 #
2017/2071(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights that the EIB’s role in cohesion policy is increasing, especially due to the increased use of combining financial instruments with grants; emphasises that the level of use of financial instruments is still very low and that Member States point to the complexity of the procedures as one of the reasons for that; Therefore, the combination of financial instruments with grants should take place only when a financial instrument alone cannot achieve its objectives.
Amendment 63 #
2017/2071(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. In 2016, urban financing has amounted to around 21 bn EUR. However, EIB should better link its financing with the Urban Agenda and Cohesion Policy objectives and have a real complementary role at urban level.
Amendment 66 #
2017/2071(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Regrets the lack of communication and data available on the role of the EIB at each stage of the implementation cycle of cohesion policy and the limited understanding of the ways in which EIB lending activities contribute to cohesion policy.
Amendment 4 #
2017/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for an in-depth reform of the own-resources system without increasing the fiscal burden for European tax payers, including new own resources (ORs) that could reduce the share of GNI-based contributions (which accounted for 65.4 % of the Union’s revenue in 2016) and a phase-out of all forms of rebate; stresses that the current system includes complex and opaque correction mechanisms and contributes to the lack of sufficient payment appropriations each year;
Amendment 23 #
2017/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Invites all parties to draw the appropriate conclusions from the HLGOR’s report and to analyse the feasibility of the recommendations to help make the Union budget more stable, simple, autonomouscoherent, fair and, predictable and transparent;
Amendment 25 #
2017/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Highlights the importance of the principle of subsidiarity in any change to the composition of own resources; emphasizes that complementarity between the national and European levels enables the appropriate funding of the EU budget, supports the overall EU policy objectives and allows a targeted use of the budget;
Amendment 36 #
2017/2053(INI)
4. Points out that these new types of ORs are essential to finance more recent Union priorities such as migration, internal security and defence while creating synergies and minimizing the fiscal burden, and to offset the loss in revenue of EUR 9 to 12 billion a year which could result from Brexit; notes also that new ORs are needed to avoid the potential spending cuts to the common agricultural policy (CAP) presented in the Commission’s ‘Reflection Paper on the Future of EU Finances’;
Amendment 47 #
2017/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Amendment 57 #
2017/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the CAP’s added value in strengthening the Union’s long-term food and environmental security through more stable farm incomes and rural development measures to prevent rural depopulation; emphasises the potential of the CAP to provide more environmental public goods and stresses the need to safeguard the contribution of agricultural duties to EU finances.
Amendment 15 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the common agricultural policy (CAP) is fundamental for food security, the preservation of rural populations and sustainable development; regretminds that the CAP, which once accounted for 75 % of the EU budget is now only 38 % as laid down in the current multiannual financial framework (MFF), while food requirements have increased, as has the need to develop environmentally friendly farming practices and to mitigate the effects of climate change; urges the Commission to increase, or at least to maintain at its current level, the CAP budget post-2020;
Amendment 39 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to continue defending farmers and to fund information campaigns on the CAP budget since the amount of aid publicised can be misleading, given that the public is unaware of the fact that the bulk of the CAP is financed at EU level and replaces national spendingtake further steps to simplify the funding system of CAP, continue defending farmers and to raise the awareness of EU´s important role in supporting European food production; stresses that the CAP delivers good quality products at affordable prices to Europeans;
Amendment 56 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that Brexit will have a projected impact of between EUR 3.8 and EUR 4.1 billion a year on the CAP, and calls therefore on the Commission to defind alternative forms of financing, for example by increasing Member States’ contributions as a percentage of gross national income; stresses the need to increasee clear and strict priorities as less money will be available; asks the Commission to facilitate access for the agricultural sector to other financial instruments like EFSI, and the EAFRD; stresses to keep funding in line with responses to the various cyclical crises in sensitive sectors such as milk, pork, fruits and vegetables, and to create instruments that can mitigate price volatility in times of crisis;
Amendment 65 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that Brexit will have a projected impact of between EUR 3.8 and EUR 4.1 billion a year on the CAP, and calls therefore on the Commission to find alternative forms of financing, for example by increasing Member States’ contributions as a percentage of gross national income; stresses the need to increase funding in line with responses to the various cyclical crises in sensitive sectors such as milk, pork, fruits and vegetables, and to create instruments that can mitigate price volatility; bearing in mind the increasing need to foster the competitiveness of European agriculture sector globally;
Amendment 69 #
2017/2052(INI)
3 a. Stresses the importance of improved budget control and calls on the Commission to develop a policy that will give better account of the destination and results of EU tax payer's money;
Amendment 78 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to keep direct payments intact as they help to avoid distortions of competition between Member States, and to maintain them without any national co-financing; urges the Commission to continue the process of convergence of direct payments between Member States; stresses the importance to maintain the variety of measures, including voluntary coupled support, available to Member States to maintain the production on sectors vital for vulnerable areas without distortion effect on internal market;
Amendment 105 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for continued support for those most in need, as agricultural activity and food production should be possible in all areas of the EU; including family farms and small and medium-sized farms, as well as the most disadvantaged, areas of natural constraints, mountain and outermost regions; calls on the Commission to envisage increasing the envelope for programmes of options specific to isolation and insularity (POSEI), as called for by Parliament;
Amendment 110 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls on the Commission within the next MFF to support farmers' access to innovations such as modern breeding techniques and precision farming by increasing synergies in between different forms of funding programs and improving the role of agriculture in EU´s research programs;
Amendment 1 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas a macro-region can be defined as an geographical area including territoryregions from a number of different countries or regions associated with one or more common features or challenges12; _________________ 12 Schmitt et al (2009), EU macro-regions and macro-regional strategies – A scoping study, NORDREGIO electronic working paper 2009:4.
Amendment 5 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas macro-regional strategies (MRS) are significant, as they are able to mobilise public institutional actors and civil society towards common EU policy goals;
Amendment 7 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas MRS provide a platform for cooperation between EU Member States and among third countrineighbouring non-Member States for the purposes of addressing common challenges, joint planning and fostering cooperation between and improving the integration of different policy sectors;
Amendment 10 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas macro-regions are involved in the implementation of long- term, interconnected, useful and cross- cutting political issues;
Amendment 12 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas MRS are based on the ‘three no’s’ principle of no new funding, no new structures and no new legislation for now within the existing EU political framework;
Amendment 13 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas pre-existing cooperation mechanisms at EU level and between Member States facilitate the implementation of macro-regional strategies, particularly in the early phases;
Amendment 16 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the Commission adopts a single report on the success of the implementation of all existing EU macro- regional strategies every two years, with the next report due by the end of 2018;
Amendment 18 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. The relevance of the MRS has been underlined by the globalisation process, which has rendered individual countries interdependent and necessitates solutions to the cross-border problems involved, better coordination and joint planning;
Amendment 20 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises that – to a varying degree – elements on which the quality of implementation depends, such as commitment, ownership, resources and governance, remain difficult to overcome in achieving the pre-determined goals;
Amendment 24 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that MRS continue to make an invaluable and innovative contribution to cross-border, cross-sector and multi- level cooperation in Europe, the potential of which is not sufficiently taken advantage of;
Amendment 28 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Is of the opinion that multi-level governance should be embedded inis the cornerstone of all macro-regional strategy from its inceptionies;
Amendment 33 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Encourages improved coordination and better partnerships between the different actors and policies at national and, regional leveland local level, as well as international organisations operating in this field, in order to facilitate and improve the implementation of the MRS;
Amendment 41 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises the importance of developing administrative capacity in the competent state authorities in order to ensure the effective implementation of the strategies;
Amendment 45 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines the fact that MRS must be flexible enough to be adjusted and respond to unforeseen events which may affect the regions involved, the Member States and the EU in general; highlights the necessity of the Commission’s coordinating role in this regard;
Amendment 48 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses the important roles played by the experiences drawn from previous successful macro-regional strategies in ensuring the effective implementation of all macro-regional strategies.
Amendment 51 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the results achieved since the launch of the strategy in 2009, particularly with regard to the cooperation mechanisms not only between but also within the regions and countries involved;
Amendment 55 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Highlights the positive impact the strategy has had on cooperation between the participating countries and regions;
Amendment 59 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Considers the Danube Financing Dialogue as a clear positive example of a way to overcome difficulties in financing the obstacles which projects of transnational and cross-border relevance often face;
Amendment 64 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses that it is essential to maintain a high degree of political support and increase resources and capacity of competent state authorities in order to tackle the remaining challenges and improve implementation;
Amendment 68 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses the importance of the strategy in the process of integration of the non-Member States;
Amendment 70 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Highlights the distinct nature of the EUSAIR on account of the number of potential and candidate participating countries, and considers that this format of cooperation can be a great opportunity for the entire region, in particular as regards the European integration process;
Amendment 74 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Notes with concern the persistent problems of resources, governance and ownership, which are preventing the strategy’s objectives from being fully achieved, and calls on the involved countries to bolster and provide greater support to the competent authorities in implementing the strategy, where such a need exists;
Amendment 88 #
2017/2040(INI)
16a. Highlights the strategy's enormous potential to stimulate development and better integration in the region's transport and energy infrastructure;
Amendment 91 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Considers the EUSALP as proof that the macro-regional concept can also be applied advantageously to more developed regions of the Member States;
Amendment 94 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses that the EUSALP can be a good example of a template strategy for territorial cohesion, as it simultaneously incorporates different specific areas, productive areas, mountains and rural areas and some of the most important and developed cities in the EU;
Amendment 100 #
2017/2040(INI)
20. Stresses that the Alpine region is delineated by many borders and that the EUSALP can also provide the opportunity to strengthen transnational cross-border cooperation between regions and cities, to forge links and networks between people and to eliminate existing borders and barriers for workers and economic activities;
Amendment 106 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Points out that MRS bear fruitattain the planned results if they are rooted in a long-term political perspective and organised in such a way that all stakeholders are effectively represented from the outset, in particular taking account of the representation of local and regional levels of government;
Amendment 114 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Believes that strategy implementation can only be successful if based on efficient coordination and cooperation structures, including specific multi-level governance, and backed by adequate funding; highlights the need, in this respect, to seek synergies and complementarities of regional, national funding with EU funding instruments;
Amendment 122 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Proposes that the participating countries make clear commitments in terms of funding for implementation from the outset;
Amendment 127 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses that greater result- orientation towards the achievement of results is required in order to justify the investment of resources, which should, for its part, be commensurate with the objectives set;
Amendment 129 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls for any questions about the MRS, such as on ownership and the necessary political incentives, as well as the stronger and higher-quality involvement of all levels of government in implementation, to be addressed in an appropriate manner;
Amendment 133 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Is of the opinion that the visibility of the results achieved and awareness about the activities of the macro-regions need to be enhanced;
Amendment 147 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 – point d a (new)
Paragraph 28 – point d a (new)
(da) the issue of the quality of the involvement of regional and local government in the implementation;
Amendment 153 #
2017/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. It is necessary to consider the sustainability of the existing 'three no's' principle with regard to the quality of implementation, and to consider new solutions that would include the minimum funds and structures needed to improve the implementation and achievement of results;
Amendment 16 #
2017/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the reality of climate change is already being felt in the EU in the form of extreme weather phenomena: desertification, heatwaves, floods, sea level rise, and water shortages;
Amendment 19 #
2017/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas climate change is accentuating the social disparities that have already been widening in the EU over the past decade, increasing the vulnerability of the weakest sections ofgroups in society that have fewer capacities and resources to cope with its effects;
Amendment 42 #
2017/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Deplores the grave irresponsibility of certain sections of industry, the media and politics that continue to deny the evidence of climate change;
Amendment 51 #
2017/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises that cities need to play a decisive role in tackling climate change, in coordinated interdependence with national authorities and their surrounding region;
Amendment 57 #
2017/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Points out that climate change interacts with factors such as social and gender segregation, migration, the demographic challenge, urbanisation, technological change and energy transition and that this requires an overarching vision, which is more feasible and effective on a local and regional scale;
Amendment 59 #
2017/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Warns of the economic impact that is currently affecting – and will affect significantly more seriously in the future – public health and social care systems that are already overburdened and facing a precarious economic situation, and that will be required to meet growing and more complex needs; stemming from climate change impacts;
Amendment 63 #
2017/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recognises that mitigation is a long-term process that transcends election cycles and decisions taken at local and regional level, and calls for mitigation to be seen as a source of opportunities in the face of other challenges such as employment and action to improve health and public services;
Amendment 80 #
2017/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Believes that in the forthcoming programming period climate change will need to be mainstreamed into territorial cooperation programming, especially as regards cross-border cooperation, and that projects of that type should be encouraged, given that the causes and effects of climate change occur on a transnational, cross-border scale;
Amendment 81 #
2017/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Believes that in the forthcoming programming period climate change needs to feature more prominently among the goals to be pursued by EU macro- regional strategies, which should in turn be dovetailed more exactly with the territorial cooperation programmes;
Amendment 106 #
2017/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Highlights the important role played by territorial cooperation, and cross-border cooperation in particular, in the action carried out by regions and cities, and reiterates the need to strengthen this tool politically and financially;
Amendment 125 #
2017/2006(INI)
20. Urges that plans be implemented within the framework of coordinated multilevel governance, – ranging from European to local level – with full transparency, the involvement of local communities, partnership between the public and civil sectors, and broad public participation;
Amendment 127 #
2017/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Calls on national authorities to bring about decentralisation and give better effect to the subsidiarity principle, thereby enabling local and regional authorities to play a stronger role in tackling climate change;
Amendment 144 #
2017/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Believes that the transfer of knowledge and experience should be encouraged at local and regional level, given the wealth of experience acquired by individual regions and cities, as well as by certain regional environmental protection or energy agencies;
Amendment 146 #
2017/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 b (new)
Paragraph 23 b (new)
23b. Believes that European and international or worldwide organisations and associations or networks of cities, municipalities, and regions should be put to use in order to make for better cooperation when dealing with climate change problems at local and regional level;
Amendment 35 #
2017/0309(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) Prevention is of key importance for protection against disasters and requires further action. To that effect, Member States should share risk assessments on a regular basis as well as summaries of their disaster risk management planning in order to ensure an integrated approach to disaster management, linking risk prevention, preparedness and response actions. In addition, the Commission should be able to require Member States to provide specific prevention and preparedness plans in relation to specific disasters, notably with a view to maximising overall Union support to disaster risk management. AThe administrative burden should be reduced and prevention policies and financial capacities strengthened, including by ensuring necessary links to other key Union policies and instruments, notably the European Structural and Investment Funds as listed in recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/201313. _________________ 13 Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 320).
Amendment 42 #
2017/0309(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) There is a need to reinforce the collective ability to prepare and respond to disasters notably through mutual support in Europe. In addition to strengthening the possibilities already offered by the European Emergency Response Capacity ('EERC' or 'voluntary pool'), from now on referred to as "European Civil Protection Pool", the Commission should also establish rescEU. The composition of rescEU should include emergency response capacities to respond to natural or man- made disasters such as wildfires, large- scale floods and earthquakes, as well as a field hospital and medical teams in line with World Health Organisation standards, that can be rapidly deployed.
Amendment 50 #
2017/0309(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 7 a (new)
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The scope afforded by EU macro- regional strategies should be put to use in order to establish operational prevention, management, and action centres when a disaster occurs in an area extending beyond a Member State's national territory.
Amendment 52 #
2017/0309(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 7 b (new)
Recital 7 b (new)
(7b) It should be ensured that, if the need arises, Member States can work at the Union's external borders together with neighbourhood countries in order to prevent disaster and mitigate its effects. In addition to the contribution in the event of disaster, this is a way to bolster the European integration process.
Amendment 82 #
2017/0309(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) take action to promote education, improve the knowledge base on disaster risks, and facilitate the sharing of knowledge, the results of scientific research, best practices and information, including among Member States that share common risks, taking into account the possibility of using the European Social Fund.
Amendment 109 #
2017/0309(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 12 – paragraph 8
Article 12 – paragraph 8
8. In case of deployment, the Commission shall agree with the requesting Member State or States on the operational deployment of rescEU capacities. The requesting Member State shall facilitate operational co-ordination of its own capacities and rescEU activities during operations.
Amendment 100 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) As the Programme aims at enhancing the competitiveness of the Union's defence industry, only entities established in the Union and effectively controlled by Member States or their nationals should be eligible for support, as direct beneficiaries or subcontractors. Additionally, in order to ensure the protection of essential security interests of the Union and its Member States, the infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources used by the beneficiaries and subcontractors in actions funded under the Programme, shall not be located on the territory of non-Member States.
Amendment 104 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
Recital 13 a (new)
(13 a) The international nature of the value and supply chains in the defence industry is a reality that must be honed rather than suppressed, done so in a way that guarantees Europe’s security interests.Whereas the security interests of the European Union are indelibly connected to its non-EU partners on the continent.As such, an undertaking for which the participation of an SME subcontractor or third party originating in an EFTA member state remains eligible to receive funding under the Programme, provided that participants show that the goods and/or services provided by these subcontractors or third parties are vital to the completion of a project, that these same good and/or services cannot be obtained in an EU member state, and that the EU’s security interests are defended.
Amendment 122 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The promotion of innovation and technological development in the Union defence industry should take place in a manner coherent with the security interests of the Union. Accordingly, the action's contribution to those interests and to the defence capability priorities commonly agreed by Member States should serve as an award criterion. Within the Union, common defence capability priorities are identified notably through the Capability Development Plan. Other Union processes such as the Coordinated Annual Review on Defence (CARD) and the Permanent Structured Cooperation will support the implementation of relevant priorities through enhanced cooperation. Where appropriate regional or intcoopernational cooperativeve capability initiatives, such as in the NATO context, and serving the Union security and defence interest, may also be taken into account.
Amendment 133 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) The financial assistance of the Union under the Programme should not exceed 2035% of the total eligible cost of the action when it relates to prototyping which is often the most costly action in the development phase. The totality of the eligible costs should however be covered for other actions in the development phase by Member States or by private sources.
Amendment 143 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) The Commission should establish a multiannual work programme in line with the objectives of the Programme. The Commission should be assisted in the establishment of the work programme by a committee of Member Stateswithin the meaning of Regulation (EU) 182/2011 (hereinafter referred to as Programme Committee). In light of the Union policy on Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) as key to ensuring economic growth, innovation, job creation, and social integration in the Union and the fact that the supported actions will typically require trans-national collaboration, it is of importance that the work programme will reflect and enable such cross-border participation of SMEs and that therefore a proportion of the overall budget will benefit such action.
Amendment 183 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) to support the creation of a common definition of technical specifications;
Amendment 185 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) To foster better exploitation of the results of defence research and contribute tothus closing the gaps between research and development, by encouraging the production of the researched products and technologies.
Amendment 201 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point –a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point –a (new)
(-a) studies such as feasibility studies and other accompanying measures;
Amendment 202 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the design of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology as well as the technical specifications on which such design has been developed which may include partial tests for risk reduction in an industrial or representative environment;
Amendment 209 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f
Amendment 211 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(f a) development of technologies or assets increasing efficiency across the life cycle of defence products and technologies.
Amendment 218 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The action shall be undertaken in a cooperation of at least three different undertakings which are established in at least two different Member States. The undertakings which are beneficiaries shall not effectively be controlled, directly or indirectly, by the same entity or shall not control each other.
Amendment 227 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Consortia as defined in Article 9(1) shall offer proof of viability via a demonstration that the remaining costs of the eligible action which are not covered by the EU support will be covered by other means of financing such as Member States’ contributions.
Amendment 228 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. When it relates to actions defined underFor actions described in points (b) to (f) of the first paragraph, the action must be based on common technical specificationsconsortia shall prove their contribution to the competitiveness of the European defence industry through the demonstration that at least two Member States intend to jointly procure the final product or use the technology in a coordinated way, including joint procurement where applicable.
Amendment 245 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Beneficiaries shall be undertakings established in the Union, in which Member States and/or nationals of Member States own more than 50% of the undertaking and effectively control it within the meaning of Article 6(3), whether directly or indirectly through one or more intermediate undertakings. In addition, all infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources used by the participants, including subcontractors and other third parties, in actions funded under the Programme shall not be located on the territory of non-Member States during the entire duration of the action or the production.
Amendment 251 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. By derogation from paragraph 1, an undertaking that includes the participation of an SME subcontractor or third party originating in an EFTA Member State is eligible under the following conditions: a) That the participants show that the goods and/or services provided by these SME subcontractors or third parties are vital to the completion of a project; b) That these same good and/or services cannot be obtained in an EU Member State; c)That the Member State in which the undertaking is located provides sufficient assurances, in accordance with national procedures, that this would not contravene the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States as established in the framework of the Common Foreign and Security Policy in accordance with Title V of the TEU.
Amendment 254 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Subcontractors shall be undertakings established in the Union, in which Member States and/or nationals of Member States own more than 50% of the undertaking and effectively control it within the meaning of Article 6(3), whether directly or indirectly through one or more intermediate undertakings.
Amendment 262 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. For the purposes of the actions funded under the Programme, thebeneficiaries and their subcontractors shall not be subject to control bynon-EU States or by non-EU entities.
Amendment 263 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 b (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Member States, in cooperation with the European Defence Agency and the External Action Service, should ensure that information about the Programme is adequately distributed to ensure that SMEs have access to information related to the Programme.
Amendment 265 #
Amendment 268 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph –1 (new)
Article 9 – paragraph –1 (new)
-1. A consortium for the purpose of the Regulation is a group of undertakings as defined in Article 6(2) wishing to participate in an action under the Programme, and that meet the eligibility criteria laid down in this Regulation.The beneficiaries that will receive funding pursuant to the award procedure in Article 14 shall also be considered a consortium for the purpose of this Regulation.
Amendment 271 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The members of a consortium participating in an action shall be considered beneficiaries as defined in Article 7(1).
Amendment 279 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) excellencecontribution to excellence in particular by showing that the proposed work goes beyond the state of the art by showing significant advantages over existing products or technologies;
Amendment 282 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) contribution to innovation in particular by showing that the proposed actions include ground-breaking or novel concepts and approaches, new promising future technological improvements or the application of technologies or concepts previously not applied in defence sector;
Amendment 284 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) contribution to the innovation and technological development ofdustrial autonomy of the European defence industriesy and thus to fostering the industrial autonomy of the Union in the field of defence technologies; and,o the security and defence interests of the Union in line with defence capability priorities commonly agreed by Member States within the Union and, where appropriate, regional and international cooperative agreements;
Amendment 291 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) contribution to the unification of technical specifications;and
Amendment 292 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) viability notably via a demonstration by the beneficiaries that the remaining costs of the eligible action are covered by other means of financing such as Member States’ contributions and private sources of funding; and
Amendment 297 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) for actions described in points (b) to (ef) of Article 6(1), the contribution to the competitivenessfurther integration of the European defence industrysector through the demonstration by the beneficiaries that Member States have commitintend to jointly produce and procureuse, own or maintain the final product or technology in a coordinated way, including joint procurement where applicable.
Amendment 300 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(e a) the proportion of the overall budget of the action to be allocated to the participation of SMEs established in the European Union bringing added value, either as members of the consortium, as subcontractors or as other undertakings in the supply chain, and in particular to SMEs which are established in the Member States other than those where the undertakings in the consortium which are not SMEs are established;
Amendment 302 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
(e b) Non-fulfilment of any of these criteria shall not be considered eliminatory.
Amendment 309 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The financial assistance of the Union provided under the Programme may not exceed 2035% of the total cost of the action where it relates to prototyping. In all the other cases, the assistance may cover up to the total cost of the action.
Amendment 316 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. If a consortium is developing an action related to the items as defined in Article 5(1), in the context of Permanent Structured Cooperation, it may benefit from a funding rate increased by an additional 10 percentage points.
Amendment 320 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 b (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. If a consortium is developing an action as defined in Article 5(1) and commits to allocate at least 5% of the of the eligible cost of the action to SMEs which are established in the EU, it may benefit from a funding rate increased by percentage points equivalent to the percentage of the cost of the action allocated to SMEs but not exceeding 8 percentage points.
Amendment 330 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The work programme shall set out in detail the categories of projects to be funded under the Programme, the type of financing and the allocated budget, including the maximum funding rates, and the desired categories of eligible actions as defined in Article 5(1), including where appropriate the evaluation methodology including weightings and minimum thresholds for the fulfilment of the award criteria.
Amendment 338 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. The work programme shall ensure that at least10% of the overall budget will benefit the cross-border participation of SMEs;in addition, a specific category of projects dedicated to SMEs shall be established by the work programme.
Amendment 343 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. The proposals submitted following the call for proposals shall be evaluated by the Commission assisted by independent experts on the basis of the award criteria of Articleto be validated upon request by Member States, on the basis of the eligibility and award criteria set out in Articles 6, 7, 8and 10.
Amendment 346 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. The European Defence Agency shall be invited as observerto provide its views and recommendations. The EEAS shall also be invited to attend the Programme Committee.
Amendment 358 #
2017/0125(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. The Commission shall provide an interim report, halfway through the implementation of the Programme, that will include an assessment of the governance of the Programme, implementation rates, project award results including SMEs and Mid-caps involvement and the degree of their cross- border participation, and funding granted in accordance with Article 190 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/12 as set out in Article 14(1), by 30 July 2019.
Amendment 20 #
2017/0111(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In its 2014 Communication on a Strategy for reducing Heavy-Duty Vehicles’ fuel consumption and CO2 emissions13 , the Commission recognised that a prerequisite to introducing such measures is a regulated procedure for the determination of CO2 emissions and fuel consumption. __________________ 13In its 2017 Mobility Package ‘Europe on the move’, the Commission envisaged a proposal for heavy-duty vehicle standards in the first half of 2018. Timely publishing of this proposal is crucial to agree the new standards within this mandate. __________________ 13 COM(2014) 285 final. COM(2014) 285 final.
Amendment 23 #
2017/0111(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Information on a vehicle’s performance in terms of CO2 emissions and fuel consumption should be made publicly available to enable all vehicle operators to take well-informed purchasing decisions. All vehicle manufacturers will be able to compare their vehicles’ performance with those of other makes. This will increase the incentives for innovation and therefore increase competitiveness. That information will also provide policy makers at Union and Member State level with a sound basis for developing policies to promote the uptake of more energy-efficient vehicles. Making necessary information publicly available will allow stakeholders to do the targeting testing independently and to check if the engines in-service are efficient as OEMs claim in the tests. This would also create more competition between the manufacturers and encourage them to make the most efficient engine possible. It is therefore appropriate that the CO2 emissions and fuel consumption values determined for each new heavy-duty vehicle pursuant to Commission Regulation (EU) […/…]15 [Opoce to include correct reference] are monitored, reported to the Commission and made available to the public. __________________ 15 Commission Regulation (EU) […/…] implementing Regulation (EU) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the determination of CO2 emissions and fuel consumption of heavy-duty vehicles and amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulation (EU) No 582/2011 (OJ L…,..,..).
Amendment 31 #
2017/0111(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) In order to acquire a complete knowledge on the configuration of the heavy-duty vehicle fleet in the Union, its development over time and potential impact on CO2 emissions, it is appropriate to monitor and report and make publicly available in a digitally searchable format and free of charge the data on the registration of all new heavy-duty vehicles and all new trailers, including the data on the efficiency of powertrains as well as the relevant bodywork and components.
Amendment 60 #
2017/0111(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission mayshall carry out its own verification of the quality of the data, on a representative sample and on a regular basis, reported pursuant to Articles 4 and 5.
Amendment 72 #
2017/0111(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The Commission shall review the VECTO test procedure without any delay to include all heavy goods vehicles categories (at the latest by 1 July 2020), hybrid and zero emission powertrains (at the latest by 1 January 2020) and trailers (at the latest 1 January 2020) and report all the relevant data.
Amendment 2 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In its Communication “A European Solidarity Corps” of 7 December 201618 , the Commission emphasised the need to strengthen the foundations for solidarity work across Europe, to provide young people with more and better opportunities for solidarity activities covering a broad range of areas, and to support national, regional and local actors, in their efforts to cope with different challenges and crises. The Communication launched a first phase of the European Solidarity Corps whereby different Union programmes have been mobilised to offer volunteering, traineeship or job opportunities to young people across the EU. These activities, whether implemented before or after the entry into force of this Regulation, should continue to apply the rules and conditions set by the respective Union programmes that have financed them under the first phase of the European Solidarity Corps. _________________ 18 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A European Solidarity Corps, COM(2016) 942 final of 7.12.2016.
Amendment 4 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Young people should be provided with easily accessible opportunities to engage in solidarity activities, which could enable them to express their commitment to the benefit of communities while acquiring useful experience, knowledge, skills and competences for their personal, educational, social, civic and professional development, thereby improving their employability. Those activities would also support the mobility of young volunteers, trainees and workers.
Amendment 5 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) Special attention should be given to multilingualism as some of the exchanges will be transnational.
Amendment 8 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The European Solidarity Corps would provide a single entry point for solidarity activities throughout the Union. Consistency and complementarity of that framework should be ensured with other relevant Union policies and programmes. The European Solidarity Corps should build on the strengths and synergies of existing programmes, notably the European Voluntary Service. It should also complement the efforts made by Member States, regions and cities to support young people and ease their school-to-work transition under the Youth Guarantee19 by providing them with additional opportunities to make a start on the labour market in the form of traineeships or jobs in solidarity-related areas within their respective Member State or across borders. Complementarity with existing Union level networks pertinent to the activities under the European Solidarity Corps, such as the European Network of Public Employment Services, EURES and the Eurodesk network, should also be ensured. Furthermore, complementarity between existing related schemes, in particular national solidarity schemes and mobility schemes for young people, and the European Solidarity Corps should be ensured, building on good practices where appropriate. _________________ 19 Council Recommendation of 22 April 2013 on establishing a Youth Guarantee (2013/C 120/01).
Amendment 11 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) In order to maximise the impact of the European Solidarity Corps, provisions should be made to allow other Union programmes such as the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Europe for Citizens programme, the European Social Fund, the European Regional Development Fund and the Health Programme to contribute to the objectives of the European Solidarity Corps by supporting activities within its scope. This contribution should be financed in accordance with the respective basic acts of the concerned programmes. Once they have obtained a valid European Solidarity Corps quality label, the beneficiaries should be given access to the European Solidarity Corps portal and receive the quality and support measures provided according to the type of activity offered.
Amendment 12 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The European Solidarity Corps should open up new opportunities for young people to carry out volunteering, traineeship or job placements in solidarity- related areas as well as to devise and develop solidarity programmes and projects based on their own initiative. Those opportunities should contribute to enhancing their personal, educational, social, civic and professional development. The European Solidarity Corps should also support networking activities for European Solidarity Corps participants and organisations as well as measures to ensure the quality of the supported activities and to enhance the validation of their learning outcomes.
Amendment 19 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) In order to ensure continuity in the activities supported by the programmes contributing to the European Solidarity Corps, the financial support to solidarity placements and projects should indicatively follow an 80 75%-205% split between volunteering placements and solidarity projects on the one hand and traineeship and job placements on the other hand.
Amendment 21 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) The European Solidarity Corps should target young people, irrespective their sex, their gender or their physical and mental abilities, aged 18-30. Participation in the activities offered by the European Solidarity Corps should require prior registration in the European Solidarity Corps Portal.
Amendment 22 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) n its Communication “A European Solidarity Corps” of 7 December 2016,18 the Commission emphasised the need to strengthen the foundations for solidarity work across Europe, to provide young people with more and better opportunities for solidarity activities covering a broad range of areas, and to support national, regional and local actors, in their efforts to cope with different challenges and crises. The Communication launched a first phase of the European Solidarity Corps whereby different Union programmes have been mobilised to offer volunteering, traineeship, development or job opportunities to young people across the EU. These activities, whether implemented before or after the entry into force of this Regulation, should continue to apply the rules and conditions set by the respective Union programmes that have financed them under the first phase of the European Solidarity Corps. _________________ 18 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A European Solidarity Corps, COM(2016) 942 final of 7.12.2016.
Amendment 25 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) An entity willing to apply for funding to offer placements under the European Solidarity Corps should have first received a quality label as a precondition. This requirement should not apply to natural persons seeking financial support on behalf of an informal group of European Solidarity Corps participants for their programmes and solidarity projects.
Amendment 27 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Young people should be provided with easily accessible opportunities to engage in solidarity activities, which could enable them to express their commitment to the benefit of communities while acquiring useful experience, knowledge, skills and competences for their personal, educational, social, civic and professional development, thereby improving their employability. Those activities would also support the mobility of young volunteers, trainees and workers.
Amendment 28 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
Recital 35
(35) In compliance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the European Union26, the Commission should adopt work programmes and inform the European Parliament and the Council thereof. The work programme should set out the implementing measures needed for their implementation in line with the general and specific objectives of the European Solidarity Corps, the selection and award criteria for grants, as well as all other elements required. Work programmes and any amendments to them should be adopted by implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure. _________________ 26 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.
Amendment 30 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The solidarity activities offered to young people should be of high quality, in the sense that they should respond to unmet societal needs, contribute to strengthening communities, offer young people the opportunity to acquire valuable knowledge, skills and competences, be financially accessible to young people, and be implemented in safe and healthy conditions.
Amendment 30 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40 a (new)
Recital 40 a (new)
(40a) Given the therapeutic value of working with animals, special attention should be given to providing opportunities for young people with mental and physical disabilities to work on care farms;
Amendment 36 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The European Solidarity Corps would provide a single entry point for solidarity activities throughout the Union. Consistency and complementarity of that framework should be ensured with other relevant Union policies and programmes. The European Solidarity Corps should build on the strengths and synergies of existing programmes, notably the European Voluntary Service. It should also complement the efforts made by Member States, regions and cities to support young people and ease their school-to-work transition under the Youth Guarantee19 ,by providing them with additional opportunities to make a start on the labour market in the form of traineeships or jobs in solidarity-related areas within their respective Member State or across borders. Complementarity with existing Union level networks pertinent to the activities under the European Solidarity Corps, such as the European Network of Public Employment Services, EURES and the Eurodesk network, should also be ensured. Furthermore, complementarity between existing related schemes, in particular national solidarity schemes and mobility schemes for young people, and the European Solidarity Corps should be ensured, building on good practices where appropriate. _________________ 19 Council Recommendation of 22 April 2013 on establishing a Youth Guarantee (2013/C 120/01).
Amendment 38 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) In order to maximise the impact of the European Solidarity Corps, provisions should be made to allow other Union programmes such as the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Europe for Citizens programme, the European Social Fund, the European Regional Development Fund and the Health Programme to contribute to the objectives of the European Solidarity Corps by supporting activities within its scope. This contribution should be financed in accordance with the respective basic acts of the concerned programmes. Once they have obtained a valid European Solidarity Corps quality label, the beneficiaries should be given access to the European Solidarity Corps portal and receive the quality and support measures provided according to the type of activity offered.
Amendment 38 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
(8) “traineeship” means a period of work practice from two to twelve months, remunerated by the organisation hosting the European Solidarity Corps participant, based on a written traineeship agreement, which includes a learning and training component, and undertaken in order to gain practical and professional knowledge and experience with a view to improving employability and facilitating transition to regular employment;
Amendment 42 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The European Solidarity Corps should open up new opportunities for young people to carry out volunteering, traineeship or job placements in solidarity- related areas as well as to devise and develop programmes and solidarity projects based on their own initiative. Those opportunities should contribute to enhancing their personal, educational, social, civic and professional development. The European Solidarity Corps should also support networking activities for European Solidarity Corps participants and organisations as well as measures to ensure the quality of the supported activities and to enhance the validation of their learning outcomes.
Amendment 43 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to provide young people, with the support of participating organisations, with easily accessible opportunities for engagement in solidarity activities while improving their knowledge, skills and competences for personal, educational, social, civic and professional development, as well as their employability and facilitating transition into the labour market, including by supporting the mobility of young volunteers, trainees and workers;
Amendment 49 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. The financial support to solidarity placements and projects referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) of Article 7(1) shall indicatively be 8075% for volunteering placements and solidarity projects; and 2025% for traineeship and job placements.
Amendment 53 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. Young people, irrespective of their sex, their gender or their physical and mental abilities, aged 17 to 30 years willing to participate in the European Solidarity Corps shall register in the European Solidarity Corps Portal. However, at the moment of commencing a placement or a project a registered young person shall be at least 18 years of age and not older than 30.
Amendment 55 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission, in cooperation with the participating countries, shall ensure the dissemination of information, publicity and follow-up with regard to all actions supported in the framework of the European Solidarity Corps, with special attention to the debriefing of participants after their participation.
Amendment 56 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. National young ambassadors' programs should be established promoting the European Solidarity Corps in different Member States.
Amendment 62 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) In order to ensure continuity in the activities supported by the programmes contributing to the European Solidarity Corps, the financial support to solidarity placements and projects should indicatively follow an80 75%-205% split between volunteering placements and solidarity projects on the one hand and traineeship and job placements on the other hand.
Amendment 75 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) An entity willing to apply for funding to offer placements under the European Solidarity Corps should have first received a quality label as a precondition. This requirement should not apply to natural persons seeking financial support on behalf of an informal group of European Solidarity Corps participants for their programmes and solidarity projects.
Amendment 78 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) Appropriate outreach, publicity and dissemination of the opportunities and results of the actions supported by the European Solidarity Corps should be ensured at European, national, regional and local level. The outreach, publicity and dissemination activities should rely on all the implementing bodies of the European Solidarity Corps, including, when relevant, with the support of other key stakeholders.
Amendment 83 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
Recital 35
(35) In compliance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the European Union,26 the Commission should adopt work programmes and inform the European Parliament and the Council thereof. The work programme should set out the implementing measures needed for their implementation in line with the general and specific objectives of the European Solidarity Corps, the selection and award criteria for grants, as well as all other elements required. Work programmes and any amendments to them should be adopted by implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure. _________________ 26 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.
Amendment 94 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) “participant” means a young person (18-30 years old) who has registered in the European Solidarity Corps Portal and takes part in a solidarity activity under the European Solidarity Corps offered by a participating organisation;
Amendment 97 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) “disadvantaged young people” means individuals who need additional support because of disability, educational difficulties, economic or social obstacles, cultural differences, health problems, social obstacles, geographical obstacles;
Amendment 113 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
(8) “traineeship” means a period of work practice from two to twelve months, remunerated by the organisation hosting the European Solidarity Corps participant, based on a written traineeship agreement, which includes a learning and training component, and undertaken in order to gain practical and professional knowledge and experience with a view to improving employability and facilitating transition to regular employment;
Amendment 136 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to provide young people, with the support of participating organisations, with easily accessible opportunities for engagement in solidarity activities while improving their knowledge, skills and competences for personal, educational, social, civic and professional development, as well as their employability and facilitating transition into the labour market, including by supporting the mobility of young volunteers, trainees and workers;
Amendment 141 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. The actions of the European Solidarity Corps shall be consistent with and complementary to the relevant Union policies and programmes relating to the areas mentioned in Article 2(1) as well as existing Union level networks pertinent to the activities of the European Solidarity Corps.
Amendment 168 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. The financial support to solidarity placements and projects referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) of Article 7(1) shall indicatively be 8075% for volunteering placements and solidarity projects; and 205% for traineeship and job placements.
Amendment 216 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission, in cooperation with the participating countries, shall ensure the disseminationspreading of information, publicity and follow-up with regard to all actions supported in the framework of the European Solidarity Corps.
Amendment 23 #
2017/0004(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Since the objectives of this Directive, which are to improve living and working conditions and to protect the health of workers, including farmers and agricultural workers, from the specific risks arising from exposure to carcinogens, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, but can be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5(3) of the Treaty on European Union. As a part of these measures the Commission should consider creating an expert panel to harmonise at the EU-level the minimum requirements and limit values in order to avoid unfair competition between among member states jeopardising workers' health and safety. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in Article 5(4) of the TEU, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
Amendment 25 #
2017/0004(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19 a (new)
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) Farmers and agricultural workers should on a regular basis be informed and updated about these particular substances and their possible risks.
Amendment 15 #
2016/2903(RSP)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas it is important to promote the development of alternative procedures or techniques to reduce dependence on conventional pesticides;
Amendment 17 #
2016/2903(RSP)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas it is still possible to find undesirable pesticide residues in soil, water and the environment in general, and even a certain percentage of agricultural products of plant or animal origin may contain pesticide residues above the maximum residue levels for pesticides;
Amendment 64 #
2016/2903(RSP)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses the vital importance of giving special emphasis to products protected by biological low-risk pesticides, as opposed to products protected by conventional means;
Amendment 91 #
2016/2903(RSP)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses the need to launch a wide public debate on the advantages of consuming products protected by alternative low-risk pesticides;
Amendment 41 #
2016/2326(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas it is the main instrument supporting inclusive and smart growth in all EU regions;
Amendment 55 #
2016/2326(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Highlights the fact that cohesion policy funds contribute to growth and convergence if they are properly directed towards high-quality projects; stresses the importance of national policies being in line with EU priorities;
Amendment 87 #
2016/2326(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the importance, for countries that participate, of territorial cooperation in the area of cross-border cooperation with non-Member States in the EU integration process;
Amendment 93 #
2016/2326(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines that the current categorisation of regions, the thematic objectives and the performance framework have demonstrated the value of cohesion policy and should be consolidated; asks the Commission to present ideas for greater flexibility, such as an unallocated reserve or a simplification of re-programming, in order to adapt ESIF investments to unforeseen events and to the specific needs of each region;
Amendment 105 #
2016/2326(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses the need to create a new programming system for cohesion policy that would take a different approach towards countries and regions depending on their specific development needs and the level of development of community and business infrastructure that has been achieved, and depending on their different assumptions, economic structure and capacity to achieve the objectives of cohesion policy;
Amendment 132 #
2016/2326(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Points out that increasing the administrative capacities for programming, implementation and evaluation of operational programmes, as well as for better-quality professional training in the Member States and regions is crucial for timely and successful cohesion policy performance;
Amendment 148 #
2016/2326(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Commission to prepare a standard procedure for drafting implementing documents, establishing competent bodies and implementing territorial cooperation programmes, particularly in the area of cross-border cooperation, given the large number of these programmes and the possibilities for achieving swifter and more efficient implementation and for preventing delays arising from the slow-moving and often heavily bureaucratic procedures between countries participating in the programmes;
Amendment 214 #
2016/2326(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on the Commission to consider measures aimed at resolving the issue of national financing of cohesion policy projects in view of the problem faced by local and regional authorities in highly centralised Member States that do not have sufficient fiscal and financial capacities and that experience great difficulties in co-financing projects, and often even in drafting project documentation, due to the lack of available financial resources, which leads to lower utilisation of cohesion policy;
Amendment 230 #
2016/2326(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Suggests an increased use of ESI Funds in order to tackle demographic change and address its negative regional and local consequences; notes the increasing importance of the Territorial Agenda and of successful rural-urban partnerships, as well as the exemplary role of smart cities as microcosms and catalysts for innovative solutions for regional and local challenges;
Amendment 255 #
2016/2326(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Highlights the fact that in order to improve the visibility of ESI Funds, greater focus must be placed on participation by stakeholders and recipients; urges, furthermore, the Commission, Member States, regions and cities to communicate, including by using advanced technological solutions and social networks, in a more efficient way on both the achievements of cohesion policy and the lessons to be learned;
Amendment 273 #
2016/2326(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Reiterates that it is high time to prepare the post-2020 EU cohesion policy in order to launch it more swiftly and effectively at the very start of the new programming period;
Amendment 288 #
2016/2326(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Calls for the financial share of cohesion policy to be increased in relation to the overall plan for the post-2020 financial perspective, or maintained at the same level as under the current plan;
Amendment 54 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Notes how free, fair and transparent municipal elections in 2017 are crucial for democratic future of Kosovo as well as future of its EU integration process; urges authorities to adopt electoral reform guided by advices from the Venice Commission; is concerned that independent audits of political party financing and party electoral campaigns have not been conducted for the last three years;
Amendment 68 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Condemns in the strongest terms the violent disruption of activities which occurred in the first half of the year and welcomes the return of the opposition to participate in Assembly proceedings on most issues; stresses the importance of the active and constructive participation of the opposition in the decision-making processes within the democratic institutions; underlines the importance of orderly arrangements of decision-making processes, time adequate and open parliamentary debates by ruling coalition who should avoid fast-track procedures of adoption of sensitive laws; calls for upgrading of the capacity of the EU Integration Committee given its important role in advancing EU-related reforms;
Amendment 103 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the proposal by the Commission to grant visa liberalisation, which would be a very positive step for Kosovo on the path to European integration; is concerned by the stalemate in the Assembly with regard to the ratification of the demarcation agreement with Montenegro, and stresses that visa liberalisation can only be granted once Kosovo has fulfilled all criteria, including with regard to building up a track record of high-level convictions for corruption and organised crime; is of opinion that designating Kosovo as a safe country of origin on the EU common list of safe countries of origin would be most welcoming in combating irregular migration;
Amendment 156 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Notes that Ombudsperson began implementing the 2015 law on the Ombudsperson with increased and improved reporting and urges adoption of related secondary legislation; calls on assembly and government to ensure the financial, functional and organisational independence of the Ombudsperson, in line with international standards on national human rights institutions; urges government to follow up reports and recommendations of the Office of the Auditor General and Ombudsperson;
Amendment 176 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Expresses serious concerns at the lack of progress with regard to the protection of freedom of expression and media freedom, and at the increased political interference and pressure and intimidation exerted on the media; urges the Kosovo authorities to fully recognise and protect freedom of expression in line with EU standards and to end impunity for attacks against journalists; urges authorities to find a solution for the sustainable funding of the public broadcaster and to adopt legislations and regulations on media ownership and transparency;
Amendment 197 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Is concerned that Kosovo continues to be a storage and transit country for hard drugs; notes with concern the lack of secure storage for seized drugs prior to destruction; expresses serious concerns about the low rate of convictions in cases against human trafficking, despite Kosovo being a source, transit and destination for trafficked women and children; notes with concern the existence of armed groups and their involvement in organised criminal activities such as arms smuggling and the apparent impunity with which they are able to operate across borders;
Amendment 228 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the increased efforts to counter violent extremism and radicalisation and recognises the important work carried out by Kosovo in this area; including adoption of comprehensive legal framework; is of opinion that authorities should set up mechanisms to link central institutions with local actors to enable the early detection of radicalisation; calls for further identification, prevention and disruption of flow of foreign fighters and untraceable money intended for further radicalization; notes that many foreign fighters have returned to Kosovo and calls on the authorities to establish effective policies for prevention, de-radicalisation and reintegration; as criminalisation of the returned foreign fighters is not the sole solution; calls on the authorities to defend country's secular Constitution;
Amendment 237 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Welcomes the improvement of the economic situation and the increase in tax revenues which are making more resources available for the government to carry out its policies; expresses, however, its concerns about the sustainability of Kosovo’s budget with regard, in particular, to the amount of the benefits allocated to war veterans, and calls, in this connection, for the reform of the relevant law as agreed with the International Monetary Fund; is concerned that migrant remittances constitute an important driver of domestic demand; expresses concern about discrimination of women on labour market, especially in hiring process;
Amendment 241 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Notes with concern high youth unemployment (57.7 %); calls for set up of an action plan for tackling youth unemployment focussing on improving education outcomes, including through improved teacher training and supporting school-to-work transitions; welcomes the conclusion of 2016 Paris summit and the establishing of first Regional Youth Cooperation Office (RYCO); calls on government to fully support its activities and projects aimed at providing the European perspective for youth on WB;
Amendment 245 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20 b. Regrets that there is no progress on improving the quality of education; is concerned that 75 % of overall spending on education was for salaries, only 0.2 % of education spending was earmarked for training of teachers and total spending on research and innovation amounted to just 0.05 %;
Amendment 254 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21 a. Notes that tendering specifications for application for all forms of contracts under IPA fund are so demanding that Kosovar or regional companies often cannot even apply for them and to that end calls for special attention to be given to guide and instruct interested stakeholders; urges authorities to direct the remaining assistance, which has not yet been programmed, towards projects with more direct impact on economy of Kosovo;
Amendment 283 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Urges the Kosovo authorities to adopt a credible long-term energy strategy based on energy efficiency, the diversification of energy sources and the development of renewables; expressed concern that almost no progress was made in making the energy sector more sustainable, in terms of both security of supply and environmental situation; Calls on the authorities to sign the Western Balkans 6 Memorandum of understanding on regional electricity market development and on establishing a framework for future collaboration with other countries; underlines that it is necessary to urgently take steps to increase the share of renewables in the country's energy mix as well as to adopt legislative framework on energy efficiency in order to mitigate further disruption of security of supply; calls on the government to respect the agreement to close down Kosovo A power plant and make use of the EUR 60 million allocated for this purpose by the EU within the framework of IPA funds; calls for a hydropower strategy for the Western Balkans as a whole; in this regard calls on government to make progress on building the Zhur hydropower plant, which is instrumental in reaching the 2020 mandatory climate targets;
Amendment 287 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26 a. Welcomes the launch of new railway connectivity project on the Orient/East-Med Corridor with the new railway track and stations in Kosovo that constitutes Kosovo's sole connection to the wider region; calls on government to fully support the implementation of the project;
Amendment 46 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
E a. whereas there are still 74 000 internally displaced persons and a significant number of refugees from Bosnia and Herzegovina in neighbouring countries, whole Europe and world-wide, as well as 6 808 missing persons;
Amendment 56 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the consideration of BiH’s EU membership application by the Council and looks forward to the Commission’s opinion on the merits of the application for membership; calls on competent BiH authorities at all levels to cooperate and coordinate in participating in the Commission’s Opinion process by providing a single set of replies to the Commission’s inquiries; deems unacceptable that the Government of the Republika Srpska is trying to establish parallel channels of communication by adopting provisions on direct reporting to the European Commission;
Amendment 78 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the progress on the implementation of the 2015-2018 Reform Agenda, as well as the country’s determination to pursue further institutional and socio-economic reforms; stresses that harmonised implementation of the Reform Agenda is needed to achieve real change across the country and to improve the lives of all BiH citizens; calls for the reform momentum to be maintained in order to transform BiH into a fully effective, inclusive and functional state; regrets that common reform efforts often continue to be hampered by ethnic and political divisions, and through further politicization of public administrations; considers it essential to maintain consensus on EU integration and to advance in a concerted manner on the rule of law, including the fight against corruption and organised crime, the reform of the judiciary and public administration;
Amendment 95 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Regrets that the Rules of Procedure of the SAPC have still not been adopted and it therefore could not be properly constituted, due to the attempts to introduce ethnic blocking into the SAPC's voting rules, and it therefore could not be properly constituted; urges all actors to agree to and accept Rules and procedures of the SAPC based on the recommendation of the European Parliament's opinion on the subject;
Amendment 99 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the local elections of 2 October 2016 have been broadly conducted in an orderly manner; regrets that the citizens of Mostar have again been deprived of their democratic rights to elect their local representatives owing to continued disagreements between political leaders, and urges swift implementation of the Constitutional Court ruling on Mostar; condemns the unacceptable incident in Stolac and calls on all sides to resolve the situation by respecting the rule of law; reiterates that all acts of violence or election irregularities should be investigated and condemned in the clearest possible terms, and any unlawful activities prosecuted;
Amendment 105 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Regrets that the declared political commitment to combat corruption did not translate into tangible results; underlines that there is a lack of track record of high profile cases and that legal and institutional framework for combating systemic corruption like political party finance, public procurement, conflict of interest, and assets declaration is weak and inadequate; acknowledges progress in adopting anti- corruption action plans and setting up corruption prevention bodies at various levels of governance; notes with concern that fragmentation and weak inter- agency cooperation hamper the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures; calls for greater professional specialisation within the police and the judiciary by means of appropriate coordination channels; stresses the need to establish a track record of effective scrutiny of political party and electoral campaign financing;
Amendment 123 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Reiterates its concern about the continued fragmentation into four different legal systems; stresses the needcalls for adoption of the principles of judicial independence and prosecutorial autonomy in Bosnia and Herzegovina constitution in order to strengthen judicial independence, including from political pressure, and to fight corruption in the judiciary; urges the rapid adoption of the action plan for the implementation of the 2014-2018 justice sector reform; welcomes the adoption of the law on free legal aid at state level and the introduction by the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council of guidelines on prevention of conflict of interest, the drafting of integrity plans and disciplinary measures; notes the important role of the Structured Dialogue on Justice in addressing the shortcomings in the BiH judiciary; is concerned by the continuous financial and human resource difficulties of the Ombudsperson's Offices and calls for the fast adoption of the law on the reform of the Ombudsperson;
Amendment 130 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Strongly condemns the still effective Law on Order in RS which undermines the fundamental democratic rights of the freedom of assembly, freedom of association and freedom of media, as well as the provision on the death penalty in the RS; urges the full implementation of the Freedom of Access of Information Act; urges the authorities to swiftly implement the additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems;
Amendment 137 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Regrets that a high number of constitutional court decisions are not being implemented, including in particular those related to the election system, including the Sejdić- Finci ruling, the decision on the RS day, which was contested in the referendum held on 25 September 2016 and the decision concerning the respect of the basic democratic rights of the citizens of Mostar to vote in local elections; calls for constitutional and legislative changes in order to achieve equality of all constitutive peoples and citizens of BiH, as well as to establish a functioning state and democratic society; emphasises that respect for the rule of law and the country’s functioning constitutional framework is of paramount importance for advancing on the EU path;
Amendment 148 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes satisfactory cooperation on war crimes cases with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and encourages more regional cooperation with regard to processing war crimes cases; welcomes the fact that the backlog of domestic war crimes cases is being tackled and that some further progress was achieved in the successful prosecution of war crimes involving sexual violence; reminds all political leaders and institutions in BiH that they have a responsibility to assess war-time events objectively, in the interests of truth, reconciliation and a peaceful future, and to avoid misuse of judiciary for political purposes; strongly condemns the decision of the RS National Assembly in October 2016 to express appreciation to former leaders of the RS convicted of war crimes, as well as entity- wide glorification of persons convicted for the gravest crimes against humanity; calls, as a matter of urgency, for respect for victims of war crimes and for reconciliation to be promoted;
Amendment 153 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes some progress with regard to refugees and internally displaced persons in terms of repossession of property and occupancy rights as well as the reconstruction of houses; calls on the competent authorities to facilitate their access to healthcare, employment, social protection and education, including damage compensation for property that cannot be returned to victims; notes that there are still 74 000 internally displaced persons (7 500 still accommodated in 45 collective centres) and a huge number of refugees; is concerned with persistently high number of missing persons and slow progress in that respect; calls on the authorities to embark on intensive cooperation between the two entities, and strengthen the efforts to find the 6808 persons still missing as a result of the war, including full sharing of all relevant military and intelligence data;
Amendment 167 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Notes some progress in fighting organised crime; is concerned, however, about the absence of a consistent approach in tackling organised crime owing to the numerous action plans by the various law enforcement agencies at different levels; highlights the need to strengthen the framework for inter-agency cooperation; welcomes joint investigations but calls for more coordinated operations and better exchange of information; calls for enhancing capacities of law enforcement bodies including on counter-terrorism; welcomes the signing of the operational and strategic cooperation agreement with Europol aimed at combating cross-border criminality; calls on the Federation entity to make swift changes to the criminal code that would ban all forms of human trafficking, whose victims are 80% women and girls;
Amendment 171 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Calls for strengthening mechanisms for collecting, sharing and analysing data on migration as statistics show an increasing trend of people coming to BiH from the high-migratory- risk countries (in 2015 the number was 293 943 individuals); calls on the authorities to integrate these communities into the wider society; draws attention to the fact that there are unintegrated, often undocumented, people living in isolated pockets across BiH, who don't pay taxes and don't respect the country's secular background;
Amendment 172 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13 b. Calls on the Commission to continue the work on migration related issues with all the countries of the Western Balkans, in order to make sure that European and international norms and standards are followed; welcomes the work done so far and underlines that adequate IPA funding should be set aside to this end;
Amendment 179 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls for boosting efforts to combat radicalisation and further measures to identify, prevent and disrupt the flow of foreign fighters as well as channels of untraceable money intended for further radicalization, including by close cooperation with relevant services of the Member States and countries in the region; calls for the introduction of programmes on de-radicalisation and preventing youth radicalisation; is of the opinion that linking various central institutions with local actors would enable early detection of radicalism; calls on the authorities to defend the country's secular Constitution;
Amendment 193 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Deems it essential to enhance public participation in decision-making and to better engage citizens in the EU accession process; notes that civil society is fragmented, institutionally and financially weak; calls for better cooperation mechanisms between government and civil society organisations, including the developing of a strategic framework for cooperation; condemns repeated smear campaigns and violent attacks on CSO representatives and human rights defenders;
Amendment 208 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines the need for a substantial improvement in the strategic, legal, institutional and policy frameworks on the observance of human rights; calls for the adoption of a countrywide strategy on human rights and non-discrimination; is concerned about continued discrimination against persons with disabilities in the fields of employment, education and access to health care; calls for developing a comprehensive and integrated approach to the social inclusion of Roma, and the introduction of programmes on de- radicalisation and the prevention of the radicalisation of Roma population; welcomes the fact that some governments and parliaments have begun discussing LGBTI rights and drawing up specific measures for their protection; welcomes changes to the BiH anti-discrimination law extending the listed grounds for discrimination to age, disability, sexual orientation and gender identity;
Amendment 214 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for efforts to increase the participation of women in political life and employment, to improve their socio- economic situation and to strengthen women’s rights on the whole; notes that legal provisions providing equality between women and men are broadly in place but their implementation continues to be ineffective; is concerned about lack of systematic recording of gender-based violence and calls for urgent harmonisation of adopted laws in that regard (free legal aid, court representation, protective measures, support to victims); is extremely worried about underfunding of safe houses and continuation of work of safe house in Mostar, which closed in early 2016 due to the absence of official financial support, and is now only reopened thanks to donations of international NGOs;
Amendment 223 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Calls on the Government to harmonise legislation and public policies with the Istanbul Convention: to inform women survivors of violence about the available forms of support and assistance, to establish crisis centres for victims of rape or other forms of sexual violence, to criminalise offences of stalking, forced marriage and genital mutilation;
Amendment 252 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Remains concerned by the continued fragmentation, inefficiency and complexity of the education system; calls for countrywide common core curricula and better coordination between the different levels of education governance; continues to be concerned about high proportion of early leavers from education and training, especially males, and the persistently high school-drop-out rates of Roma pupils; regrets the slow progress in addressing and resolving the issue of ‘two schools under one roof’ and other forms of segregation and discrimination in schools;
Amendment 267 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the slight reduction in unemployment; remains concerned, however, that unemployment continues to be largely of a structural nature and that youth unemployment continues to be high, resulting in very high levels of brain drain; calls on the competent authorities to introduce active labour market policies targeting in particular the youth, women and the long-term unemployed as well as reinforcing the capacities of the employment services; underlines how market conditions remain adverse for women, with lingering maternity-related discrimination;
Amendment 273 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Commends the adoption of the country-wide Framework transport strategy and action plan in July 2016; calls on the authorities to align the legal framework on transport with the relevant EU legislation to provide the functional transport chains and remove the bottlenecks on corridor Vc;
Amendment 275 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22 b. Welcomes the participation of BiH in "Western Balkans six initiative" and EU Strategy for Adriatic-Ionian region; highlights that agreed EU priority electricity and gas transmission interconnection projects with neighbouring countries are stalled due to lack of political agreement on a country- wide energy strategy; in this regard urges the adoption of country-wide sector strategy on energy, as well as missing strategies on environment and agricultures as they are a key requirement for Bosnia and Herzegovina to benefit fully from IPA funding;
Amendment 277 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 c (new)
Paragraph 22 c (new)
22 c. Notes active engagement of the Joint Parliamentary Committee for Security and Defence in ensuring democratic control over the armed forces of BiH; is concerned by the widespread presence of weapons held illegally by the population and still large stockpiles of ammunition and weapons under the responsibility of the armed forces; urges a comprehensive approach to address the remaining challenges of clearing the country of mines by 2019; calls on the Commission and HR/VP to enhance its aid in these activities;
Amendment 281 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Welcomes BiH’s continued constructive and pro-active role in promoting bilateral and regional cooperation; calls for further efforts to resolve outstanding bilateral issues, including on border demarcation with Serbia and Croatia; commends BiH for further increasing its alignment with relevant EU statements and decisions under the Common Foreign and Security Policy from 62 % to 77 %; considers it important to coordinate BiH foreign policy with EU foreign policy and that the EU remain actively engaged in preserving safety and security in BiHnotes with disappointment that BiH did not align itself with Council decisions introducing EU restrictive measures in the context of Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea and events in eastern Ukraine; considers it important to coordinate BiH foreign policy with EU foreign policy and that the EU remain actively engaged in preserving safety and security in BiH; welcomes the continued presence of Operation Althea, which retains the capability to contribute to the Bosnia and Herzegovina authorities' deterrence capacity if the situation so requires while focusing on capacity building and training;
Amendment 11 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas Albania has made steady and constant progress in its EU accession process; whereas further implementation of, inter alia, the judicial reform package, in particular the vetting law, electoral reform and the so-called decriminalisation law is important in strengthening citizens’ trust in their public institutions and political representatives;
Amendment 14 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas challenges still persist and need to be addressed swiftly and efficiently in a spirit of dialogue, cooperation and compromise between government and opposition in order to make further progress on its path to EU accession;
Amendment 19 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas the EU has highlighted the need to strengthen economic governance, the rule of law and public administration capacities in all of the Western Balkan countries;
Amendment 38 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes Albania’s continuous progress on EU-related reforms, in particular the adoption of constitutional amendments paving the way for a deep and comprehensive judicial reform; stresses that not only consistent adoption but also full and timely implementation of reforms and sustained political commitment are essential in order to further advance the EU accession process;
Amendment 47 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Fully supports Albania’s accession to the EU, and calls for the accession negotiations to be opened as soon as there is credible and sustainable progress in the implementation of judicial reform, fight against organized crime and corruption in order to keep the reform momentum; expects Albania to consolidate the progress achieved and to maintain the pace of progress on implementation of all key priorities;
Amendment 52 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Reiterates that a constructive dialogue, sustainable political cooperation and a willingness to compromise is crucial for the success of the reforms and for; underlines that lack of political cooperation and polarisation undermine the entire EU accession process;
Amendment 60 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Commends the consensual adoption of the constitutional amendments for judicial reform and the adoption of laws on the institutional reorganisation of the judiciary in close cooperation with the Venice Commission; calls for the swift adoption and implementation of all relevant accompanying laws and by-laws, in particular the law on the re-evaluation (vetting) of judges, prosecutors and legal advisors as an important instrument to fight corruption in Albania; notes that the application of the vetting law has been suspended by the Constitutional Court, and that the latter has requested the opinion of the Venice Commission on its constitutionality; reiterates that a comprehensive judicial reform is a major demand by Albania’s citizens for re- establishing trust in their political representatives and public institutions, and that the credibility and effectiveness of the overall reform process, including the fight against corruption and organised crime, depend on the success of the vetting process and judicial reform;
Amendment 70 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the new justice reform strategy 2017-2020 and its action plan, as well as the increased budgetary means for implementation; stresses that administration of justice continue to be slow and inefficient; notes the lack of progress in the filling of vacancies at the High Court and the administrative courts and the effective use of the unified case management system; calls for any shortcomings in the functioning of the judicial system to be further addressed, including lack of independence from other branches of power, selective justice, limited accountability, ineffective oversight mechanisms, corruption, the overall length of judicial proceedings and enforcements;
Amendment 77 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Ad-Hoc Parliamentary Committee on Electoral Reform to finalise its review of the electoral code while addressing all previous OSCE/ODIHR recommendations; calls on the competent authorities to ensure implementation in due time before the upcoming parliamentary elections of June 2017; recalls that all political parties are responsible for in order to address the lack of impartiality and professionalism in the electoral administration; calls on all political actors that ensuring thatfair and democratic elections are conducted in compliance with international standards is an important precondition to further advance the EU accession process; calls on Albania’s political parties to respect the law, in spirit and in letter, on the exclusion of criminal offenders from public office when drawing up their candidate lists; calls on the authorities to encourage CSOs to actively participate in the overview of the whole electoral process;
Amendment 95 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes the efforts towards a more citizen-friendly public administration and steady progress in the implementation of public administration reform; calls for further progress in strengthening the application of the Civil Service Law and the Law on Administrative Procedures, in order to safeguard the independence of regulatory bodies, improve recruitment procedures based on merit and performance, and enhance institutional and human resource capacities, with a view to ensuring efficient conduct of EU accession negotiations; calls for enhancing the authority, autonomy, efficiency and resources of human rights structures, such as the office of the Ombudsman; commends the National Council for European Integration on its initiatives to enhance the capacities of public administration and civil society in monitoring the implementation of accession-related reforms;
Amendment 104 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the adoption of key pieces of anti-corruption legislation, including on the protection of whistle- blowers; is concerned, however, that corruption remains prevalent in many areas and key anti-corruption institutions continue to be subject to political interference and have limited administrative capacities; notes that poor interinstitutional cooperation and exchange of information continue to hamper proactive investigation and effective prosecution of corruption; stresses the need for a more adequate legal framework for conflicts of interest, regulating lobbying and better interinstitutional cooperation, especially between police and prosecution services, with a view to improving their track record as regards investigation, prosecution and conviction, including in high level cases; in view of the upcoming parliamentary elections, calls for effective oversight of political party financing;
Amendment 114 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the continued implementation of the strategy and action plan on the fight against organised crime and intensified international police cooperation; welcomes recent operations against drug plantations; notes, however, that police and prosecution fail to identify criminal gangs behind drug cultivation; calls also for organised crime networks to be dismantled and for the number of final convictions in organised crime cases to be increased, by enhancing cooperation between police and prosecution services and by strengthening institutional and operational capacities; underlines the need to step up efforts to prevent human trafficking, in particular as regards unaccompanied children and child victims of trafficking;
Amendment 127 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes the improving EU-related cooperation between state institutions and civil society organisations (CSOs), including their participation in meetings of the National Council on European Integration (NCEI); stressesnotes that an empowered civil society is a crucial component of any democratic system; stresses, therefore, the need for even closer coordination at all levels of government, including at local level, with CSOs; calls for the effective implementation of the right to information and public consultation and for better regulation of the fiscal framework affecting CSOs;
Amendment 129 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes the improving EU-related cooperation between state institutions and civil society organisations (CSOs), including their participation in meetings of the National Council on European Integration (NCEI); stresses the need for even closer coordination at all levels of government, including at local level, with CSOs; calls for the effective implementation of the right to information and public consultation and for better regulation of the fiscal framework affecting CSOs; calls on the authorities to encourage CSOs to actively participate in the overview of the whole electoral process;
Amendment 130 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Urges the adoption of a national strategy for equality between women and men; calls on the Government to harmonise legislation and public policies with the Istanbul Convention; deplores that a number of laws continued to contain gender-discriminatory provisions as well as gender bias in court decisions and treatment by law enforcement agencies; is concerned over the lack of legislation or measures for the protection of women; urges authorities to tackle gender-based stereotypical preconceptions through systematic education as well as governmental measures; is deeply concerned about the increase in unemployment and long-term unemployment rates for women in 2015, as well as of lack of progress in reducing the gender gap in employment;
Amendment 136 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Urges the competent authorities to actively promote respect of human rights and continue improving the climate of inclusion and tolerance for all minorities and other vulnerable groups in the country, including by enhancing the role of the State Committee on Minorities; as regardsunderlines the need to improve the living conditions for Roma and Egyptians,; calls for continued efforts in improving their access to employment, education, health, social housing and legal aid; is concerned that, despite improvements, the inclusion of Roma children in the education system remains the lowest in the region;
Amendment 147 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Recalls that institutional mechanisms to protect the rights of the child and to tackle gender-based violence remain poor; calls for better policy implementation and better inter- institutional cooperation in order to tackle social exclusion and discrimination effectively; stresses the need for additional efforts in order to develop a track record of anti-discrimination cases;
Amendment 159 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Commends religious tolerance and good cooperation among religious communities; encourages the competent authorities and religious communities to cooperate in preserving and fostering religious harmony; considers it essential to prevent Islamic radicalisation, including through disengagement and reintegration of returning foreign fighters, to counter violent extremism in cooperation with CSOs and religious communities, and to intensify, cherishing secular Constitution; commends the country's comprehensive legal framework for the prevention and fight against the financing of terrorism; considers it essential to prevent Islamic radicalisation, as well as identification, prevention and disruption of flow of foreign fighters and untraceable money intended for further radicalization; urges for the implementation of programmes on prevention of radicalisation and de-radicalisation especially of youth and Roma population; is of the opinion that linking various central institutions and CSOs with local actors and religious communities would enable the early detection of radicalism; emphasizes the importance of strengthening of regional and international cooperation in this area;
Amendment 164 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Commends religious tolerance and good cooperation among religious communities; encourages the competent authorities and religious communities to cooperate in preserving and fostering religious harmony; notes that Albania has been affected by the phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters and a number of unauthorized mosques in the country present risks of radicalisation; considers it essential to prevent Islamic radicalisation, including through disengagement and reintegration of returning foreign fighters, to counter violent extremism in cooperation with CSOs and religious communities, and to intensify regional and international cooperation in this area;
Amendment 173 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates the critical importance of professional and independent private and public service media; is concerned about political influence in the media and widespread self-censorship among journalists; notes the slow implementation of the law on audiovisual media and the delays in filling vacancies in the Audiovisual Media Authority (AMA); with a view to upcoming parliamentary elections, calls for additional efforts to fully guarantee the independence of the Audiovisual Media Authority (AMA) and of the public broadcaster; calls for measures to raise the professional and ethical standards of and prevalence of regular work contracts for journalists, to enhance the transparency of government advertising in the media and to ensure the independence of the regulatory authority and the public broadcaster;
Amendment 179 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes improvements in fiscal consolidation, better scores in doing business, and efforts to fight the informal economy; still notes, however, shortcomings in the rule of law and a cumbersome regulatory environment, which deter investment; is concerned that migrant remittances constitute an important driver of domestic demand; urges the competent authorities to take measures for improved enforcement of contracts and better tax collection, and to continue implementing judicial reform with a view to improving the business environment;
Amendment 182 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Commends that according to the Institute of Statistic in Albania (INSTAT) the level of unemployment in Albania decreased at the lowest level during the last three years; stresses the need to rise the quality of education at all levels in order to better equip people with skills and knowledge in line with labour market needs;
Amendment 223 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Comends Albania for demonstrating a clear commitment in supporting positions promoted by the EU on peace and security; notes the finalisation of destruction of surplus conventional ammunition; calls for the destruction of the remaining stockpile of small arms and light weapons as well as improvement of the condition of storage facilities; urges Albania to bring its legislation related to the import and export of military goods and dual-use goods into line with the EU acquis;
Amendment 229 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Reiterates its request that the Commission include information about IPA support for Albania and the effectiveness of implemented measures in its reports, in particular the IPA support allocated for implementation of the key priorities and relevant projects; welcomes the participation of Albania in Western Balkans six initiative; calls on authorities to continue implementing measures agreed at the Vienna Summit in 2015, especially on transport infrastructure maintenance and road safety; calls for alignment of new energy efficiency law with the EU acquis to fully benefit from additional EU funding for energy efficiency in residential buildings and sustainable development;
Amendment 29 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas process of privatisation of the media in Serbia has led to the concentration of the ownerships of the media, specially endangering media and programs in minority languages;
Amendment 54 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the continued engagement of Serbia on the path of integration into the EU and its constructive and well-prepared approach to the negotiations, which is a clear sign of determination and political will; calls on Serbiagovernment to actively promote this strategic decision among the Serbian population; is concerned about anti-EU messages towards public from members of ruling party and government directed media broadcasters, which steam anti-EU sentiments and are clearly populist instruments;
Amendment 117 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Commends Serbia’s constructive approach in dealing with the migration crisis; notes however, that constructive approach with neighbouring countries regarding migration should be fostered; takes positive note of the fact that Serbia has made substantial efforts to ensure that third country nationals receive shelter and humanitarian supplies with EU and international support; stresses that Serbia should adopt and implement the new asylum law; calls on the Commission and the Council to provide continued support for Serbia in addressing migration challenges; encourages Serbia to ensure that the downward trend in the number of asylum seekers coming into the EU from Serbia continues; is concerned about the fact that high percentage of asylum seekers from Serbia is from Roma population;
Amendment 132 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that, while some progress has been made in the area relating to the judiciary, in particular by taking steps to harmonise jurisprudence and further promoting a merit-based recruitment system, judicial independence is not assured in practice, which prevents judges and prosecutors from implementing the adopted legislation; stresses that the quality and efficiency of the judiciary and access to justice remain undermined by an uneven distribution of the workload, a burdensome case backlog and the lack of a free legal aid system;
Amendment 152 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the progress made in the fight against organised crime andNotes the adoption of Serbia’s first national serious and organise crime threat assessment (SOCTA); is concerned about the rise of mafia murders and lack of credible investigations; calls on Serbia to step up efforts to investigate wider criminal networks, improve financial investigations and intelligence-led policing and develop a solid track record of final convictions; has taken note of the controversialstrongly condemns events in Belgrade’s Savamala district and calls for their swift resolu, deplores police' refusal to provide citizens with protection during that night and authorities' refusal to carry out thorough investigation, and disclose and punish the culprits; calls for swift resolution of the investigation;
Amendment 187 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates the importance of independent regulatory bodies, including the Ombudsmaperson, in ensuring oversight and accountability of the executive and notes authorities' frequent disregard for its recommendations; calls on the authorities to provide the Ombudsmaperson with full political and administrative support for his work; calls on authorities to follow up on its recommendations on illegal data collection by the Military Intelligence Agency on political parties' activities;
Amendment 199 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines that the legislative and institutional framework for observance of international human rights law is mostly in place; calls on authorities to adopt Law on the Protection of Rights and Liberties of Persons with Mental Disabilities, Law on Registered Same-Sex Civil Partnerships and Law on Gender Identity without delay; stresses that consistent implementation across the whole country is needed; notes that further sustained efforts are needed to improve the situation of persons belonging to vulnerable groups, includingespecially persons with disabilities, Roma people, persons with HIV/AIDS and LGBTI persons; expresses concern on the number of unprosecuted attacks on the members of vulnerable groups, especially Roma and LGBTI; expresses its concern about the discriminatory provisions in the draft Law on Rights of Civilian Victims of war which excludes a number of groups of victims of violence during the conflicts; calls on the authorities to urgently revise this key piece of legislation on transitional justice in consultation with human rights organisations and victims' associations;
Amendment 228 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Amendment 229 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Deplores constructed requirement for the use of IPA funds that demands from CSOs to become partners with the state for its application to be successful;
Amendment 248 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Invites Serbian government to fully implement all international treaties concerning minority rights such as agreement with Republic of Croatia from 2005 on protection of rights of Croatian national minority in Serbia; calls on the authorities to protect existing media and programs in minority languages during the process of privatisation;
Amendment 250 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. WelcomNotes the adoption of the new Roma social inclusion strategy 2016-2025, which covers education, health, housing and employment; calls for the full and swift implementation of the new strategy for Roma inclusion, as they are the weakest, most marginalised and discriminated group in Serbia, urgent adoption of the action plan and an establishment of the body for coordination of implementation of the action plan; condemns demolishing of informal Roma settlements by the authorities, without notification or offering of alternative accommodation; is extremely concerned about the non-issuance of personal documents to Roma people, that restricts theirs fundamental rights; is of opinion that all mentioned leads to high percentage of asylum seekers in the EU from Roma people in Serbia;
Amendment 261 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Welcomes the fact that Serbia remains constructively committed to bilateral relations with other enlargement countries and neighbouring EU Member States; hHas taken positive note of the fact that Serbia has shown an increasingly constructive engagement in regional cooperation initiatives such as the South- East Europe Cooperation Process, the Regional Cooperation Council, the Central European Free Trade Agreement, the Adriatic-Ionian Initiative, the Brdo process, the Western Balkan Six initiative and its connectivity agenda and the Berlin process; calls on Serbia to implement the connectivity reform measures associated with the connectivity agenda and the conclusion of 2016 Paris conference on Western Balkans and TEN-T regulation in order to ensure the implementation of planned transport network projects; underlines that resolution of outstanding bilateral disputes shwould not have a detrimentalpositive effect on the accession process; welcomes the adoption of a national strategy for the investigation and prosecution of war crimes; notes that the mandate of the former War Crimes Prosecutor expired in December 2015; stresses that the appointment of his successor is a matter of serious concern; calls for the implementation of this strategy and the adoption of an operational prosecutorial strategy; calls for full cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY); urges the authorities to continue working on the issue of the fate of missing persons;
Amendment 282 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Calls on authorities to promote a climate of tolerance and to condemn all forms of hate speech, public approval and denial of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes through amendments of the Criminal Code; calls for effective investigation of high-profile war crimes cases; calls for improving regional cooperation in war crime cases;
Amendment 287 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20 b. Reiterates its support for the initiative to establish the Regional commission for the establishment of facts about war crimes and other serious violations of human rights committed in the former Yugoslavia (RECOM) and urges the government of Serbia to take the lead on its establishment;
Amendment 291 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20 c. Condemns medaling of the high- profile war crimes suspect by the President of Serbia and greeting and praising the ICTY convict for crimes against humanity by government officials; condemns rehabilitation of WW2 war criminal Draža Mihajlović;
Amendment 292 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 d (new)
Paragraph 20 d (new)
20 d. Condemns interference of President of Serbia in internal politics of BiH, especially undermining BiH's sovereignty and institutions by celebrating unconstitutionally proclaimed day of RS in BiH entity Republika Srpska, as well as supporting succession plans of leadership of RS;
Amendment 316 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on Serbia to fully implement the connectivity reform measures in the energy sector; encourages Serbia to develop competition in the gas market and to take measures to improve alignment with the acquis in the fields of energy efficiency and renewable energy; calls on authorities to use additional EU funding of €50 million for developing the region's hydropower potential and energy efficiency in residential buildings in a transparent manner; commends Serbia for establishing the financing system for the environment via the Green Fund; notes with regret that there are no safeguards ensuring that the Fund's resources will be spent on environmental measures; calls on the authorities to improve the structure of the Fund so that appropriate safeguards are put in place;
Amendment 180 #
2016/2310(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Remains concerned about radical and unjustified public attacks on CSOs and foreign representatives by politicians and the media; is concerned about limited government commitment and insufficient cooperation with CSOs at all levels; urges the competent authorities to include CSOs in policymaking in a regular and structured manner; calls on the authorities to encourage CSOs to actively participate in overview of whole electoral process;
Amendment 200 #
2016/2310(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Is concerned about the lack of implementation of the Law on Equal Opportunities, the underrepresentation of women in key decision-making positions on all levels and the limited effectiveness of institutional mechanisms to advance gender equality; urges the competent authorities to make sufficient budget allocations for its implementation and to improve support services to victims of domestic violence; is concerned about the lack of women's access to the basic services, like public gynaecological services, which protect their sexual and reproductive health rights, and persistently high infant mortality rate; is extremely concerned about the restrictive and discriminatory law on termination of pregnancy that compels women to resort to illegal abortions and violates human rights; calls on swift repeal of restrictive abortion laws and policies as urged and by UN Human Rights Office of High Commissioner;
Amendment 238 #
2016/2310(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Welcomes the maintenance of macro-economic stability but is concerned that unemployment remains high with very low labour market participation, especially among youth and women; further urges competent authorities to tackle long-term and structural unemployment, to promote economic policy cooperation, to better align education with labour market demands and to develop a targeted strategy on how to better integrate young people and women into the labour market; is concerned about the outflow of highly educated young professionals; strongly calls on the government to dedicate particular attention to improving the perspectives of youth; calls on authorities to adopt a strategy promoting women's entrepreneurship, a strategy for SMEs and a strategy for tourism;
Amendment 255 #
2016/2310(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Welcomes the country's constructive role in regional cooperation, particularly in Western Balkans six initiative and connectivity agenda; notes however that transport and energy infrastructure linkages to the regional neighbours and the connection to the TEN-T are still limited; calls on authorities to strengthen the financial and technical capacity of the national accident investigation body for air and rail transport particularly, and administrative capacity for all modes of transport; is concerned that no progress was made on the opening of the electricity market; is of opinion that in this regard the government should focus on full implementation of Energy Community Treaty obligations and should adopt legislation compliant with the third energy package and unbundling of the electricity and gas system operators, as well as opening of the market;
Amendment 268 #
2016/2310(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Urges the authorities to strengthen the administrative and financing capacities in order to procure and implement EU funds properly and in a timely manner; notes with concern that the Commission has yet again reduced the IPA financial assistance by approximately EUR 27 million and calls for the reversal of that decision;
Amendment 283 #
2016/2310(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21 a. Calls on the European Commission to continue the work on migration related issues with all the countries of the Western Balkans, in order to make sure that European and international norms and standards are followed; welcomes the work done so far and underlines that adequate IPA funding should be set aside to this end;
Amendment 296 #
2016/2310(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes Macedonia’s continued constructive role in regional and international cooperation; commends the increased alignment with EU foreign policy (73 %); urges authorities to swiftly align its foreign policy with the Council decisions including the EU restrictive measures related to Russia; reminds about the need to align with the EU Directive on Defence and Sensitive Security Procurement and the 2014 EU rules on public procurement; urges authorities to finalise a Cyber-Security Strategy and reminds about the need to align it with the European Cyber Security Strategy; reiterates the importance of finalising the negotiations on a bilateral treaty with Bulgaria;
Amendment 18 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas organized crime and widespread corruption remains a serious concerns;
Amendment 44 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Commends the competent authorities for holding parliamentary elections on 16 October 2016 in an orderly manner in which fundamental freedoms were generally respected; however, notes reports of irregularities and incidents, as well as the temporary closure of two mobile communication platforms; hopes that the relevant authorities will swiftly and transparently investigate the reported irregularities; welcomes the revised legal framework under which the elections took place, but notes the persistence of some administrative deficiencies, including on the part of the State Election Commission (SEC), as well as concerns about the accuracy of the electoral register and politicisation; expects that the alleged procedural irregularities, including alleged abuses of state funds and abuse of office, and any other reported shortcomings, will be investigated fully and addressed effectively by the competent authorities; is of the opinion that an improvement of the electoral process is needed in order to build full confidence in the electoral process; notes with regret that part of the opposition has not recognised the results of the elections; recognises the attempts by external actors to discredit the electoral process and the difficulties this has caused;
Amendment 81 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the new public administration reform strategy (PAR) 2016-2020, the public financial management reform programme, the entry into force of the new law on salaries and the simplification of administrative procedures; calls for measures to allocate the appropriate budgetary resources for PAR’s implementation, as well as for consistent political will to rationalise public administration, also in view of accession preparations; notes that limited progress towards strengthening administrative capacity is often due to weak commitment to reform by the authorities and a lack of clear requirements in IPA-funded projects for the authorities to follow up and capitalise on; encourages further depoliticisation of the public administration, and considers it essential to adhere to the principles of merit, accountability and transparency, and to ensure the citizens’ right to good administration, free of corruption;
Amendment 91 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Calls on Montenegrin authorities to take a more proactive approach in following up on outstanding allegations of war crimes as well as to fight impunity; emphasises the need to effectively investigate, prosecute, try and punish war crimes in line with international standards; is concerned that no charges have been brought against officials at the top of command chain, and in regard to crimes of co-perpetration and aiding and abetting; stresses the need to effectively ensure that victims of war crimes have equal access to justice and reparations and calls for the full protection of witnesses;
Amendment 93 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the further strengthening of the anti-corruption framework, inter alia by making the Anti-Corruption Agency fully operational and by appointing special anti-corruption prosecutors; considers it essential to ensure their independence in investigations; stresses repeatedly the need to establish a track record on successful investigations and convictions, in particular in high-level corruption cases, and on measures to prevent corruption; calls for criminalising illicit enrichment; calls on the new government to make combating corruption one of its priorities by allocating sufficient human and budgetary resources to the task; regrets that sectorial action plans for areas particularly vulnerable to corruption, such as public procurement, privatisation, urban planning, education, health care, local government and police, has had very limited impact;
Amendment 99 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Notes the adoption of an action plan for fighting money laundering and terrorism financing, and the signing of the Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe’s Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism; stresses the need to continue to develop the track record in organised crime cases, especially as regards trafficking in human beings and drugs, cigarette smuggling and money laundering, to ensure stronger inter-agency cooperation and to further intensify regional and international cooperation in the fight against organised crime; is concerned about the lack of identification and protection of victims of trafficking as well as a general lack of understanding of international human rights standards and case-law which affect the performance of the judiciary;
Amendment 112 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. While acknowledging CSOs’ involvement in the accession preparations, calls on the competent authorities to further improve CSOs’ access to EU-related information and to ensure that consultations with CSOs are held in a meaningful way, where possible; is deeply concerned that smear campaigns and intimidation attempts have continued against certain CSO activistof the opinion that authorities need to develop a more supportive and inclusive approach to facilitate grassroots activities by civil society, as well as to constructively accept criticism of state institutions, and to increase CSO's level of consultation in policy-making and theirs access to information; calls on authorities to encourage CSOs to actively participate in the overview of the whole electoral process and have observers in all bodies for conducting elections; is deeply concerned that smear campaigns and intimidation attempts have continued against certain CSO activists; urges authorities to establish a sustainable and efficient system of public funding for CSOs and an appropriate institutional and legal framework; insists on proper implementation, in line with legal requirements, of the law on gaming that is the largest source of public financing for CSOs;
Amendment 122 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes some progress in improving the situation of minorities; is concerned about the vulnerable position of women and girls in the Roma community including forced child marriages; welcomes the adoption of a 2016-2020 strategy and action plan for the social inclusion of Roma and Egyptians; calls for an appropriate budget to be allocated so that the action plan may be implemented properly; is concerned about persistent attacks against LGBTI community members and activists; encourages the competent authorities to continue to strengthen efforts to safeguard the rights of LGBTI people, notwithstanding the difficulties in acceptance of sexual diversity within Montenegrin society; calls on authorities to make further efforts on raising awareness about anti- discrimination among general public; remains concerned that most public buildings, including medical centres and university faculties, are still not accessible to people with disabilities;
Amendment 127 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Calls for a further strengthening of human rights institutions, including the Ombudsperson and the Ministry of Human Rights and Minorities, and is of opinion that their knowledge of international and European human rights law and standards should be increased; is concerned about the lack of a uniform approach and low levels of penalties for human rights violations;
Amendment 132 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Remains concerned about continued gender-based violencedomestic and sexual violence, as well as prevalence of femicide, widespread gender-selective abortions on the detriment of female sex, the lack of prosecutions and the inefficient support to, and protection of, victims; calls for measures to establish adequate protection services, enhance relevant inter- institutional coordination, make effective use of the new unified database of cases of domestic violence, and implement the 2016-2020 strategy on combating domestic violence; underlines the importance to educate and train employees in state institutions to work with victims; stresses the importance of encouraging women’s representation in politics, including in key decision-making positions, as well as their access to the labour market; notes the continued implementation of the 2013- 2017 action plan on gender equality; urges the competent authorities to make sufficient budget allocations for its implementation;
Amendment 159 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Notes with concern that some IPA- funded capacity-building outputs were not fully used or followed up by the authorities; stresses that for positive outcomes authorities need to ensure adequate staff availability, adopt the necessary legislation to allow the output to be used and grant the necessary independence to newly created institutions;
Amendment 172 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Welcomes the new law on the environment, as well as the national strategy for the transposition and implementation of the EU acquis on the environment and climate change and its 2016-2020 action plan; stresses the need to reinforce implementation efforts, in particular in water quality, nature protection and waste management, as well as related administrative capacities at all levels; is concerned about the significant delay in establishing protection over the potential Natura 2000 site of Ulcinj Salina; calls for further efforts to preserve the biodiversity of the Salina and the sustainable development of the coastline; notes the awarding of six concession contracts for the exploration of offshore oil and gas blocks in the Adriatic Sea, and calls on authorities to keep vigilant oversight over the operations and to implement all protective measures in accordance with adopted legislation, regulations and EU acquis; calls on Montenegro to introduce legislation implementing the Third Energy Package, particularly Renewable Energy Directive;
Amendment 188 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Welcomes Montenegro’s proactive participation and constructive role in regional and international cooperation; commends Montenegro for continuing fully to align its foreign policy with the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy; encourages it to continue to address, in a constructive and neighbourly spirit, outstanding bilateral issues with its neighbours, including the unresolved border demarcation issues with Serbia and Croatia; urges Montenegro to comply with the EU common positions on the integrity of the Rome Statute and related EU guiding principles on bilateral immunity agreements;
Amendment 193 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Calls on the Commission to continue the work on migration related issues with all the countries of the Western Balkans, in order to make sure that European and international norms and standards are followed, welcomes the work done so far and underlines that adequate IPA funding should be set aside to this end;
Amendment 194 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18 b. Welcomes the active participation of Montenegro in the 2016 Paris summit on Western Balkans, notably on the connectivity agenda; calls on the authorities to implement newly signed border crossing agreement with Albania and to implement the Trans-European Network Regulation with regard to licensing and permitting the open access to railway market; notes that even railway market in Montenegro has been open to competition since 2014, to date, no private operators have shown interest in entering the market; calls on new government to provide an open railway market, with transparent track access charges and capacity allocation that are fully aligned with the acquis;
Amendment 309 #
2016/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls particular attention to the long-term negative effects of the emigration of young people from less- developed EU Member States; points out that the benefits gained by highly developed countries from the immigration of working-age people exceed, by several times, the assistance available to the less- developed countries of origin of immigrants;
Amendment 457 #
2016/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Welcomes efforts to create responsible fiscal policies that favour growth; welcomes efforts to introduce more just and effective tax systems and to fight tax fraud and tax evasion;
Amendment 24 #
2016/2305(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to ensure that Member States, regional and local authorities and other partners are able to engage with the complex range of grants, financial instruments and public-private partnerships that are available for connectivity projects; acknowledgesupports the establishment of the Broadband Fund but urges the EIB and the Commission to focus efforts on improving existing programmes that support the IT sector, such as Horizon 2020, rather than creating new onesexamining possibilities for further investment from cohesion policy programs in post 2020 period;
Amendment 46 #
2016/2305(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that the ambitious goals published by the Commission in September 2016 will not be achieved without empowering Member States, national regulatory authorities, regional and local government and without collaboration between them; the Member States have to be ready for clear, common, harmonised decision-making process; is deeply concerned that the opinion of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) on the new electronic communications framework highlights the potential for increased EU- level interference, additional bureaucracy and an undermining of its independence;
Amendment 52 #
2016/2305(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. In order to improve implementation, besides the infrastructural investments, new skills and necessary educational changes will be required; educational dimension of the implementation of the 5G development should be provided by using opportunities within the European social fund; territorial cross-border cooperation programs should be consider as resource for investments in 5G, improving connectivity and cohesion between the border regions;
Amendment 37 #
2016/2304(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that ensuring the visibility of cohesion policy investments should remain primarily the responsibility of the competent national authorities, and in particular local and regional authorities, as they constitute the most effective interface of communication with citizens by bringing Europe closer to them;
Amendment 52 #
2016/2304(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes in this context the uneven progress registered across Member States towards streamlining administrative procedures in terms of the broader involvement of regional and local partners;
Amendment 72 #
2016/2304(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines that it is essential to increase ownership of the policy on the ground, both locally and regionally, in order to ensure efficient delivery and communication of the results; appreciates that the partnership principle adds value to the implementation of European public policies, as confirmed by a recent Commission study, but points out that mobilising partners remains rather difficult on account of their diversity and, sometimes, conflicts of interest;
Amendment 82 #
2016/2304(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes the important role of the media in informing citizens on EU affairs; regrets nevertheless the rather limited coverage of EU cohesion policy investments; stresses the need to develop communication strategies that are adapted to the current informational challenges and take account of digital advancements and the mix of different types of media channels, particularly given the increasing influence of social media on information;
Amendment 85 #
2016/2304(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase the coordination and accessibility of existing communication means and instruments at EU level, with a view to addressing topics that have an impact on the EU agenda; emphasises in this context the importance of communicating effectively, possibly as part of the future Europe for Citizens programme, on how cohesion policy implementation delivers concrete results for the daily life of EU citizens;
Amendment 91 #
2016/2304(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the current specific communication activities, such as the ‘Europe in My Region’ campaign, the Commission’s ‘EU Budget for Results’ web application, the cooperation with CIRCOM Regional16 , and the opportunities provided by the newly created European Solidarity Corps, with a view to increasing awareness of cohesion policy impact on the ground, both locally and regionally; stresses moreover the need to concentrate efforts on reaching students and journalists as potential communication vectors, and on ensuring a geographical balance in the communication campaigns; _________________ 16 Professional Association of Regional Public Service Television in Europe.
Amendment 96 #
2016/2304(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Underlines the need to adjust the communication arrangements in the Common Provisions Regulation (EU) 1303/2013, in the sense of providing a specific envelope for communication within the technical assistance, as well as increasing the binding publicity and information requirements for cohesion policy projects;
Amendment 103 #
2016/2304(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes the initiative of the V4 countries on the externalities of cohesion policy in EU-1517 and calls on the Commission to draft a broader study at EU-28 level; further urges the Commission to differentiate its communication strategies towards net contributor and net beneficiary Member States, while highlighting the specific benefits that cohesion policy brings in terms of the real economy, fostering entrepreneurship and innovation and, creating growth and jobs in all EU regions, and improving community and economic infrastructure, both through direct investments and direct and indirect exports (externalities); _________________ 17 Report prepared within the Ex post evaluation and forecast of benefits to EU- 15 countries as a result of Cohesion Policy implementation in V4 countries, commissioned by the Polish Ministry of Economic Development and entitled ‘How do EU-15 Member States benefit from the Cohesion Policy in the V4.
Amendment 104 #
2016/2304(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the managing authorities to identify ways to facilitate and standardise access to information, in order to increase the transparency and visibility of funding opportunities and to ensure an effective exchange of information and knowledge for beneficiaries;
Amendment 117 #
2016/2304(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Highlights the role of the partnership principle in enhancing the collective commitment to and ownership of cohesion policy; calls for the link between public authorities, the economy, civil society and citizens to be strengthened through open dialogue, adjusting the composition of partnerships as necessary during implementation, with a view to ensuring the right mix of partners to represent community interests at every stage of the process;
Amendment 124 #
2016/2304(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Highlights the need to enhance the communication dimension of cross-border and inter-regional cooperation, through the dissemination of good practices and of investment success stories; highlights the communication opportunities that could be created by making better use of communication at the level of EU macro- regional strategies;
Amendment 137 #
2016/2304(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Highlights the imperative of increasing the Union’s dialogue with citizens, rethinking communication channels and strategies, taking account of the opportunities offered by social networks and new digital technologies, and adapting messages to regional contexts;
Amendment 153 #
2016/2304(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Calls on the Commission to consider the opportunities that the Europe for Citizens programme offers for providing better information on the results of Cohesion Policy;
Amendment 20 #
2016/2303(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the positive impact of the work of the Task Force for Greece and the Support Group for Cyprus on the implementation of the ESI Funds in those two countries, and in particular on absorption rates; stresses the need to form a working group, based on the experiences of the 2007-2013 programming period, to support other Member States which are experiencing difficulties in implementing Cohesion Policy;
Amendment 41 #
2016/2303(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Calls on the Commission to prepare measures and resources to set up technical assistance for the implementation of EU macro-regional strategies, having taken into account the varied experiences and rates of success of implementing such strategies, as well as the fact that the strategies' participants include non-Member States and countries with limited funds and insufficient human resources; considers that this would be more effective in helping to prepare major projects at the macro-regional level that could receive funding under Cohesion Policy;
Amendment 43 #
2016/2303(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Calls on the Commission to establish technical assistance, namely Member States Working Groups, in order to prevent delays in developing the bodies and operational programmes that will be needed under Cohesion Policy in the Member States after 2020;
Amendment 50 #
2016/2303(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Highlights that the 2019 performance review will shed some light on the results of the use of technical assistance in the 2014-2020 programming period but these will come too late for the discussions on the post 2020-period; stresses the need, therefore, to include information in the debate on technical assistance after 2020 concerning the quality of the implementation of Cohesion Policy in the Member States;
Amendment 71 #
2016/2303(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Highlights that the largest part of technical assistance resources is spent on staff costs which are necessary for the implementation of ESI Funds; considerstresses, however, that this funding should not under any circumstances act as a substitute for national financing in this area, and that there should be a gradual strategic shift towards activities which generate greater added value for cohesion policy in general, such as communication or experience- sharing;
Amendment 82 #
2016/2303(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses that technical assistance in the future should be increasingly focused on the beneficiary/project level, regardless of whether it relates to the public economic sector or to the civil society sector;
Amendment 92 #
2016/2303(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Asks the Commission to consider all these elements in the context of the preparation of the legislative proposals for post-2020 cohesion policy, i.e. experience from the current and previous programming period;
Amendment 6 #
2016/2302(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the traditional European production model needs to be preserved and enhanced, enhanced and supported in its transition to innovative, resource-efficient and climate-smart ways of production, based on small and medium-sized family farming as a guarantee of our agriculture’s social and environmental sustainability;
Amendment 12 #
2016/2302(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the current crisis in the agricultural sector, a lack of profitability with income losses and increased price instability, has led many farmers to give up farming, and this sector requires more supportfurther restructuring which will improve farmers' bargaining position in the supply chain and will promote and enhance climate- smart and environmentally-friendly production which improves the quality of soil, preserves biodiversity and thereby ensures Europe's long-term food security;
Amendment 23 #
2016/2302(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Encourages a greater involvement of regional and local authorities in the distribution and use of funds which is essential for improving farmers' position and reiterates the importance of the LEADER programme in that context;
Amendment 49 #
2016/2302(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that crucial regulatory changes in programming, implementation and management of financial instruments, such as direct links to and coverage of all 11 thematic objectives, compulsory ex-ante assessment, and creation of tailor-made and off-the- shelf solutions and reporting mechanisms, contribute toan have a critical impact on the attractiveness and speed of the implementation of financial instruments;
Amendment 49 #
2016/2302(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Highlights the importance of a stronger promotion of financial possibilities in order to encourage their use for the public and private sector; calls for a better presentation of the results achieved, especially on the regional and local level;
Amendment 51 #
2016/2302(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that delays in payments that farmers are entitled to under the CAP are avoided;
Amendment 58 #
2016/2302(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the complementary nature of these instruments in relation to subsidies and draws attention to the need to ensure that the former do not replace the latter, which would be extremely damaging for farming and the rural environment; emphasises that grant funding will continue to be essential in order to achieve the EAFRD objectives;
Amendment 61 #
2016/2302(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recognises that grants have some strengths as compared to financial instruments: supporting projects that do not necessarily generate revenue, providing funding to projects that for various reasons cannot attract private or public funding, targeting specific beneficiaries, issues and regional priorities, and lower complexity of use owing to existing experience and capacity; acknowledges that in some cases grants are bound to limitations: difficulties in achieving project quality and sustainability, risk of substituting public funding in the long-run and a crowding-out effect for potential private investment even when projects may have a revolving nature and a capacity to generate revenues to repay a loan-based financing;
Amendment 66 #
2016/2302(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Recognises that financial instruments offer advantages such as leverage and revolving effects as well as higher risk investments, including private capital through high-quality bankable projects; acknowledges that financial instruments come with certain disadvantages: slower implementation, higher complexity, and high management fees and implementation costimplementation costs that include also management fees; notes that grants represent preferable investments in some policy areas, such as the ones covered by the ESF;
Amendment 71 #
2016/2302(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for them to be implemented in such a way that they can support both collective projects and region-specific projects geared to financing basic infrastructure in the field of irrigation, transport, processing, marketing and forestry development, with maturity-based financial instruments that reflect the actual economic position for each project.
Amendment 74 #
2016/2302(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Considers that given the current situation of the European agricultural sector, it is necessary, for the period after 2020, to increase the possibilities of financing projects without lowering non- refundable financial contributions;
Amendment 79 #
2016/2302(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls that the positive experience of using financial instruments in the 2007- 2013 programming period was accompanied by a number of performance issues due in part to the lack of sufficient relevance experience at that time with the use of financial instruments in the context of cohesion policy: late start of operations, inaccurate market assessment, diverging regional uptake, overall low disbursement rates, low leverage effect, problematic revolving, high management costs and fees and inadequately large endowments; however, also recalls that after various extensions of implementation deadlines for the financial instruments belonging to the 2007-2013 programming period, a number of the original shortcomings were adequately addressed and rectified during the following two years (i.e. until end of 2015);
Amendment 107 #
2016/2302(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that some implementation delays willdid affect originally foreseen disbursement rates, revolving and leverage; recalls the fact that delays in the 2007-2013 period contributed irreversibly to sub-optimal performance of ERDF and ESF financial instruments; emphasises that all necessary steps should be taken to mitigate the negative effects of delayed implementation, especially regarding the risk of limited use and impact;
Amendment 115 #
2016/2302(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes the significant differences across the EU regarding the penetration of financial instruments, including ESI Funds and the first result of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI); emphasises that the overall success of such instruments depends on how easy they are to use and the ability of the Member States to manage investments through them;
Amendment 125 #
2016/2302(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the Commission’s actions in optimising regulation; emphasises that, despite the improvements, complexity still exists and issues such as the long set-up time and the administrative burden for recipients are disincentives to use financial instruments; calls on the Commission to work closely with the EIB and the EIF to make access to ESI Funds in combination with EFSI (i.e. for blending activities), microcredit, loans, guarantees, equity and venture capital as possibly easy as using grants;
Amendment 151 #
2016/2302(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Encourages a greater involvement of regional local authorities in the distribution and use of funds;
Amendment 167 #
2016/2302(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Highlights that financial instruments performed so far better in well- developed regions and metropolitan areas, while grants address regional structural issues; notes that increasing the share of financial instruments should not influence the grant appropriations as this would hinder the balance; emphasises that in a number of public policies grants have to dominate, while financial instruments can play complementary roles;
Amendment 169 #
2016/2302(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Highlights the importance of a stronger promotion of financial possibilities in order to encourage their use for the public and private sector; calls for a better presentation of the results achieved, especially on the regional and local level;
Amendment 170 #
2016/2302(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Considering the current situation of the cohesion and economic development, it's necessary, for the period after 2020, to increase the possibilities of financing projects without lowering non - refundable financial contributions;
Amendment 17 #
2016/2250(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Highlights that product differentiation and specialization can further stimulate and promote local production, processing and marketing of foodstuffs and thereby reduce existing disparities between OR and other EU regions;
Amendment 24 #
2016/2250(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Stresses the importance, within the POSEI scheme, of flexibility for Member States (MS) in the process of defining their programmes, while calling for clearer strategies that, on the one side, take into account MS specific needs of Member States and, on the other, comply with comprehensive EU goals;
Amendment 61 #
2016/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that demographic change should be tackled in a coordinated manner through the action of all European, national, regional and local authorities and preparing a common European strategy for challenging demographic progress;
Amendment 74 #
2016/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Stresses the importance of regional and local level of authority in confronting and tackling demographic challenges;
Amendment 86 #
2016/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the main problems relating to the demographic change currently experienced by many EU regions are decreasing population densities, an ageing population due to structural changes in the age period, falling birth rates and gradual depopulation, especially of working-age population;
Amendment 111 #
2016/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for a greater coordination of EU instruments in the different policy areas, such as the Common Agricultural Policy, European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds, European Territorial Cooperation, the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) and, the Connecting Europe Facility and financial instruments, so as to ensure a more comprehensive approach to demographic change, which will include regional and local aspects; reiterates its call for the Commission to adopt a European strategy on demographic change that will deliver synergies and maximise the positive impact on European citizens;
Amendment 148 #
2016/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Considers that tackling demographic problems must have an integral approach on the whole Europe and that the solving of the problem in one part of Europe should not have a negative effect on other European territories;
Amendment 161 #
2016/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Highlights the fact that the European Regional Development Fund can assist regions experiencing population change by boosting transport, telecommunications and, public service infrastructure and support such economic sectors for which certain regions have comparative advantages;
Amendment 168 #
2016/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses that the European Social Fund can improve education, training and employment prospects in declining regions and serve to stem trends of out-migration;
Amendment 181 #
2016/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses that the EFSI can benefit declining regions by boosting investment in energy, transport, educational, business and ICT infrastructure, as well as in research, SMEs, education and social infrastructure;
Amendment 10 #
2016/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 a (new)
Citation 15 a (new)
– having regard to its resolutions of 7 July 2005(1), of 15 January 2009(2) and of 9 July 2015(3) on Srebrenica (2015/2747(RSP)),
Amendment 36 #
2016/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas many atrocity crimes were committed on the territory of ex-Yugoslav countries in the wars between 1991-1995;
Amendment 37 #
2016/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H b (new)
Recital H b (new)
Hb. whereas trial proceedings for the atrocity crimes committed on the territory of ex-Yugoslav countries in the wars between 1991-1995 progress very slowly;
Amendment 39 #
2016/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H c (new)
Recital H c (new)
Hc. whereas the trials for atrocity crimes must not be politically motivated or be based on any kind of political balance;
Amendment 40 #
2016/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H d (new)
Recital H d (new)
Hd. whereas some practices of the ICTY, such as drastic changes of verdicts, long duration of processes, and controversial decisions (acquittal of Vojislav Šešelj), eroded its reputation;
Amendment 41 #
2016/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H e (new)
Recital H e (new)
He. whereas genuine reconciliation can be based only on truth and justice;
Amendment 60 #
2016/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Cautions that the execution of justice cannot rest on a balancing act between justice and any kind of political consideration as such balance would not foster the reconciliation efforts but diminish them;
Amendment 94 #
2016/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Regrets the fact that major world powers, USA, Russia and China, all permanent members of the UN Security Council, are not parties to the Rome Statute;
Amendment 127 #
2016/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls for the EU and its Member States to sanction countries who intentionally delay the work of the Court or officially deny the existence of proven atrocity crimes;
Amendment 136 #
2016/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on the Commission and the Council to put the prosecution of atrocity crimes high on the agenda of accession criteria for candidate countries;
Amendment 66 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas a robust and healthy Arctic ecosystem inhabited by viable communities is strategically important for the political and economic stability of Europe and the world; whereas the costs of inaction on preserving the Arctic ecosystem are increasing exponentially;
Amendment 72 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas in the last few decades the rate of warming in the Arctic has been nearly double the average global warming rate;
Amendment 98 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas the Arctic acts as a global climate regulator; whereas the Arctic influences weather patterns in Europe;
Amendment 299 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for better and earlier involvement of indigenous people in the making of a citizen-centred Arctic policy; stresses the need to safeguard their rights, culture and, language, and customs;
Amendment 331 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Welcomes the Commission’s commitment to at least maintaining the level of funding for Arctic research in Horizon 2020; welcomes the fact that about EUR 40 million has already been earmarked for 2016 and 2017 for observation-based projects, weather and climate change in the Northern hemisphere, and permafrost decrease;
Amendment 348 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls on the Commission to give the necessary encouragement so that international conventions can be drawn up and signed with a view to preventing unregulated fishing in the central Arctic Ocean;
Amendment 349 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22b. Calls on the Commission to spell out the EU’s increasingly vital strategic interests in the Arctic;
Amendment 6 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 a (new)
Citation 15 a (new)
- having regard to the petition ‘Stop Food Waste in Europe!’
Amendment 11 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas, according to a Eurobarometer survey conducted in 2009, close to 80 million people in the European Union, or 16% of the total EU population, live below the poverty line;
Amendment 13 #
2016/2223(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Stresses that local and regional products, as well as community-supported agriculture schemes, enable shorter supply chains, which increase the quality standards of products and support seasonal demands, thus having considerable social, environmental and economic benefits;
Amendment 33 #
2016/2223(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes the potential for optimisation of use of former foodstuffs and by- products from the food chain, in particular those of animal origin, in feed production and its importance for primary production, but stresses; calls on the Commission to analyze legal barriers to the use of former foodstuffs in feed production and promote research in this area, while at the same time stressing the need for increased traceability;
Amendment 40 #
2016/2223(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes the potential for optimisation of use of former foodstuffs and by- products from the food chain in feed production and its importance for primary production, but stresses the use of waste hierarchy and need for increased traceability;
Amendment 60 #
2016/2223(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the benefits of access to data and forecasts and developing advance production programmes for farmers, enabling them to better match supply to demand and minimise wastage; stresses that as zero tolerance with food waste is challenging to achieve, effective use of food waste in bio economy shall be promoted;
Amendment 61 #
2016/2223(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the benefits of digitalization which allows better access to data and forecasts and developing advance production programmes for farmers, enabling them to better coordinate with the other sectors of the food supply chain and better match supply to demand and minimise wastage;
Amendment 79 #
2016/2223(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that increased research and information isas well as cooperation and the role of producer organizations are needed on enabling access to secondary market opportunities and alternative uses for products which would otherwise be ploughed back into the soil or wasted;
Amendment 84 #
2016/2223(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Expresses concern for a binding food waste hierarchy and calls instead for the establishment of guidelines and the sharing of best practices in order to determine the most resource efficient use of food waste and food loss;
Amendment 90 #
2016/2223(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes the difficulty in quantifying food wastage and food loss at the primary production stage, and due to the heterogeneous products and respective processes and due to the lack of a clear definition of food waste1a ; calls on the Commission to identify and disseminate to Member States best practice in relation to gathering data on food loss and food waste on farms without placing an additional administrative burden on farmers; and to adopt a common methodology for measurement; further calls on the Commission to swiftly adopt a common terminology and definition of food waste, taking into account the distinction of food wastage and food loss in the primary production sector; _________________ 1aFUSIONS, Estimates of European food waste levels, March 2016.
Amendment 100 #
2016/2223(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Emphasises that educational and awareness-raising initiatives and measures, especially for the household sector, can significantly lower food wastage and increase social initiatives aimed at collecting excess foodstuffs;
Amendment 130 #
2016/2223(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that some wastage and loss at farm level is also due to the role played by retailers in relation to retailer standards regarding product specifications, cancelled orders owing to changes in consumer demand, and over-production as a result of requirements to meet seasonal demands.
Amendment 216 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Encourages the Commission and Member States to cooperate with regional and local authorities and other stakeholders in order to provide information to the authorities acting as mediators between donors and recipients of donations;
Amendment 8 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes the increased use of palm oil in processed food, with some 50 % of packaged goods now containing palm oil, and as a biofuel; calls for clear and transparent labelling of palm oil in processed goods in order to avoid misleading of consumers and urges to adapt to digital advancements;
Amendment 32 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes the alarming scale of deforestation driven by palm oil; notes that palm oil is an important driver of deforestation for commercial agriculture, where extremely biodiverse tropical forest is being converted to monocultural palm oil plantations, endangering important habitats for many animals, among them the orangutan;
Amendment 36 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes the alarming scale of deforestation driven by palm oil production; notes that palm oil is an important driver of deforestation for commercial agriculture, where extremely biodiverse tropical forest is being converted to monocultural palm oil plantations;
Amendment 57 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes with concern the occurrence of land grabbing and illegal acquisition of plantation land; notes further that land acquisition may lie outside thecalls on the relevant authorities to guarantee access to land and ensure the rule of law, as local communities’ customary tenure rights are often not respectednd thereby sustainable long-term production of palm oil while strengthening domestic and international environmental and health commitments;
Amendment 105 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Commission to step up dialogue with governments of palm-oil- producing countries in order to increase environmental, land tenure and human rights standards, as well as transparency on land tenure and corporate ownership, respecting local communities;
Amendment 126 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to establish a regulatory framework of strong and enforceable measures to guarantee that all actors throughout the supply chain, including EU financial institutions and the investments and loans they provide, are not involved in deforestation, while maintaining trade relations with third countries;
Amendment 143 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for the phasing-out of pall landm oil-based biofuels, such as palm oil biodiesel, thatwhich drives deforestation and competes against food production for land orand does not significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 13 #
2016/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas age structural agricultural sector creates concern since from 2010 only 7.5% of farmers were under 35 years old and more than 4.5 million of those now running farms are aged over 65; whereas in the period 2000- 2012, 4.8 million full-time jobs were lost in the EU agricultural industry, 70% of which were in the new Member States and 93% were self-employed, and whereas, in that connection, it is difficult to accurately assess the number of people employed in agriculture since 'illegal' employment is, by its very nature, not included in the available data1a ; _________________ 1aEuropean Commission-Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development. 2014 Management Plan (July)
Amendment 37 #
2016/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that farmers and farm workers are, by virtue of their profession, exposed to a range of external factors, such as price and market fluctuations, imbalances in agrifood chain o or even unpredictable weather, that make employment prospects precarious and insecure; considers that the Commission and the Member States must encourage the use of income-stabilisation and risk- management tools;
Amendment 43 #
2016/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Draws attention to the specific case of seasonal workers, whose working conditions are particularly precarious; understands ‘seasonal workers’ to be workers who have entered into open-ended or fixed-term employment contracts, the duration and renewal of which are contingent to a major degree on seasonal factors, such as the changing weather, public holidays and/or the timing of harvests; calls on the Commission andto promote protection rights of seasonal workers as well as the Member States to regulate the social and legal status of seasonal workers and to provide them with social security cover; emphasizes the need to provide all seasonal workers with a comprehensive information on employment and social security rights, including pensions, taking into account also a cross-border nature of seasonal work;
Amendment 55 #
2016/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Calls to the Commission together with the Members States to explore schemes to give seasonal workers long- term employment such as the implementation of pluriactivity contracts across the EU, or even via a European Agreement;
Amendment 57 #
2016/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Calls on the Member States to transpose Directive 2014/36/EU on seasonal workers into national legislation; calls on the Commission together with Members States to address the cases of immigrants´ exploitation in agricultural sector in those regions where farm workers work for almost no money and live in deplorable conditions; draws the attention of the possible "inefficiency" of labour market intermediaries, allowing the increase of influence of gangmaster agencies operating at the limits of or even outside the existing rules;
Amendment 61 #
2016/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2 c. Draws the attention to the increasingly high standards of professional competence required by agricultural sector and, therefore, the need to raises a real question about the content of vocational training to ensure a better qualification and employability of workers;
Amendment 78 #
2016/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to put into practice the recommendations set out in the Andrieu report (‘How can the CAP improve job creation in rural areas?’), which was adopted by Parliament on 27 October 2016, and in particular that concerning the mobilisationo promote and maximize the full capacity of funds from the EAFRD in an effort to develop a genuine social economy in rural areas;
Amendment 87 #
2016/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States to emphasisestrengthen the role thatof the social partners and, social protection agencies should playas well as to provide effective instruments, including adequate inspections and controls, in rural areas in combating undeclared work and improving safety and well-being at work, with a view to integrating all types of farm worker, particularly young people and women, even - and above all - those engaged in seasonal work.
Amendment 15 #
2016/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas violence against women and girls is one of the world’s most widespread human rights violations, affecting all levels of society, regardless of age, education, income, social position or country of origin or residence, and representing a majordecisive barrier to gender equality;
Amendment 29 #
2016/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas women and girls belonging to cultural, traditional, linguistic, religious, gender or sexual orientation minority groups are particularly likely to experience multiple and intersectional forms of discrimination based on both their minority status and their gender;
Amendment 43 #
2016/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Strongly condemns the continued use of rape and other forms of sexual and gender-based violence against women and girls as a weapon of war; calls on all countries, and in particular EU Member States, which have not yet done so to develop NAPs implementing UN Security Council Resolution 1325 immediately;
Amendment 56 #
2016/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for a global commitment to preventively ensure the safety of women and girls from the start of every emergency or crisis, by adequately addressing the risk of sexual and gender-based violence, raising awareness, ensuring the effective prosecution of the perpetrators of such violence and ensuring that women and girls have access to the full range of sexual and reproductive health services, including safe and legal abortion for victims of war rape;
Amendment 93 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I b (new)
Recital I b (new)
Ib. whereas there are numerous states that did not sign the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; whereas there are numerous regimes that ignore the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
Amendment 133 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital P
Recital P
P. whereas gender equality is at the very heart of human rights and United Nations' values, and at the core of European values and enshrined within the EU’s legal and political framework;
Amendment 191 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 198 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls onUrges all the EU institutions and the Member States to act on their commitments to promote, protect and realise human rights and fundamental freedoms, by using all necessary peaceful instruments, and to place human rights at the centre of the EU’s relations with all third countries – including its strategic partners – and at all levels;
Amendment 205 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates its call on the EU Member States to lead by example, by speaking with one voice in support of the indivisibility and universality of human rights and, in particular, by ratifying all international human rights instruments set up by the UN; calls on the EU Member States to never compromise when the universality of human rights is in question;
Amendment 212 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the EU to denounce, systematically and unequivocally, the killings of human rights defenders, to condemn regimes who do or tolerate such atrocities, and to step up its public diplomacy in open and clear support of human rights defenders, also when it comes to their testimony in multilateral fora;
Amendment 346 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Condemns the dramatic number of deaths at sea in the Mediterranean; is extremely concerned about the growing numbers of human rights abuses against migrants and asylum seekers on their route to Europe; highlights the weaknesses and systematic incoherence of the policies of the EU and the Member States in this area and stresses the need for a holistic approach to find long-term solutions; recalls that migrants and asylum seekers need to respect the rule of law of the EU countries and that illegal migration should be discouraged;
Amendment 671 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 74
Paragraph 74
74. Stresses that the rights to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief is aare fundamental human rights, interrelated with other human rights and fundamental freedoms and encompassing the right to believe or not to believe, the right to manifest or not to manifest any religion or belief, adhering to separation of religion and state, and the right to adopt, change and abandon or return to a belief of one’s choice, as enshrined in Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
Amendment 685 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 75
Paragraph 75
75. Calls on the EU and its Member States to ensure that religious minorities are respected worldwide, including in the Middle East, where Yazidis, Christians and Muslim minorities are being persecuted by ISIS and other terrorist groups; calls on the EU and its Member States to promote secularism worldwide as an instrument to fight religious discrimination and protect universal human rights;
Amendment 749 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 87
Paragraph 87
87. Condemns all restrictions on digital communication, including the closing down of websites and the blocking of personal accounts; calls on the EU and its Member States to publicly condemn regimes which restrict the digital communication of their critics and opposition;
Amendment 62 #
2016/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
I a. whereas it is important to support and promote the participation of women in the agri-food value chain, since their role is mainly concentrated in production and processing;
Amendment 117 #
2016/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital P
Recital P
P. whereas women in rugeneral areas also suffer from paid 16% less than men per hour of work and the gender pay andgap in pension gapstands at 41.1%; whereas the pay gap in rural areas is 10% wider than in other areas;
Amendment 134 #
2016/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Emphasises the need to support a wide spectrum of rural business initiatives, particularly in agri-tourism; in view of the growing interest in this type of tourism, considers that a network of businesses in this sector should be formed and best practice shared;
Amendment 193 #
2016/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls on the Commission, together with the Member States to promote a legislative framework for joint ownership of access at EU level, possibly by means of a statute for women in agricultural and rural areas since most women are classified as the holder´s spouse, corresponding to 80.1% of all spouses in 20071a ; _________________ 1aEuropean Commission (2012), ‘Agricultural Economic Briefs. Women in EU agriculture and rural areas: hard work, low profile’, Brief No 7 – June 2012.
Amendment 232 #
2016/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission, together with the Member States, to improve conditions for women in rural areas, and to provide not only adequate informational material on support possibilities specifically aimed at women farmers and women in rural areas, but also access to education and credit and the need for strategies to encourage and support women's entrepreneurial initiatives as they can provide women with the confidence they need to start their own businesses, while also promoting the establishment of associations and the provision of wide-ranging professional diversification advice;
Amendment 263 #
2016/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Encourages the Member States to hold discussions at EU level about a clear model for agricultural structures since the problem of land grabbing and land concentration in Europe undermines the access of women rural to land;
Amendment 295 #
2016/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9 b. Calls on the Commission, the Member States and regional and local authorities to support projects and offer advice, especially addressed to women, on creating innovative agricultural activities in rural areas in order to enhance their competitiveness in agriculture and provide new jobs;
Amendment 27 #
2016/2151(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Stresses the importance of the possibility of paying advances before 16 of October and also after the year 2017, especially concerning area-based payments to areas facing natural or other specific concerns while bearing in mind the economic situation of the farmers and two derogations made to the Article 75 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 concerning years 2015 and 2016;
Amendment 56 #
2016/2151(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the Commission’s proposed new approach to error rate analysis; welcomes also the Commission’s new procedure, likely to be applied for the first time in 2016, for prior checks, while retaining the method for dealing with minor errors; stressing that more proportionality is needed for the penalty system;
Amendment 66 #
2016/2151(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Stresses the importance of reducing the bureaucratic burden for both the farmers and the administration caused by a duplicated measurement of areas that have been measured (already) earlier;
Amendment 18 #
2016/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Congratulates Ms Emily O’ Reilly for her excellent work and for her untiring efforts to improve the quality of service offered to citizens by the European administration; acknowledges the importance of transparency as a core element of gaining trust and of good administration, something that is also underlined by the high percentage of complaints concerning transparency (22.4 %), giving this subject matter the highest ranking of all; acknowledges the role of strategic enquiries conducted by the European Ombudsman’s office in this domain;
Amendment 23 #
2016/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the continued efforts of the European Ombudsman to increase transparency in the TTIP negotiations through proposals to the European Commission; commends the resulting publication by the Commission of numerous TTIP documents and the inclusion of transparency as one of the three pillars of the Commission’s new trade strategy; notes the continuing concerns of citizens with regard to these negotiations; regrets the unnecessary level of secrecy surrounding negotiations on TTIP; encourages increased transparency in the negotiations on other international agreements;
Amendment 40 #
2016/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recognises the need for transparency in EU decision-making, and supports the investigation by the European Ombudsmen into informal negotiations between the three main EU institutions (‘trilogues’); commends the awareness- raising actions by the Ombudsman on the matter; supports the timely publishing of key ‘trilogue’ documents;
Amendment 44 #
2016/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Approves of the Ombudsman’s investigation into the make-up and transparency of the work of the Commission’s expert groups; notes the Commission’s efforts to open up these groups to the public, and calls for further actions in this direction;
Amendment 45 #
2016/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Supports the Ombudsman’s efforts in making lobbying more transparent; regrets the Commission’s reluctance to publish detailed information on meetings with tobacco lobbyists; urges the Commission to make its workings more open to the public in order to gain more trust in its work;
Amendment 57 #
2016/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the introduction of a complaints mechanism for potential fundamental human rights infringements in Frontex, following an ongoing Ombudsman investigation into practices employed by Frontex and Member States in joint forced returns of illegal migrants; commends the inclusion of the same mechanism in the new European Border and Coast Guard;
Amendment 64 #
2016/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Acknowledges that the right of citizens to have a say in EU policy-making is now more important than ever; welcomes the guidelines proposed by the Ombudsman for improving the functioning of the European Citizens’ Initiative, especially where solid reasoning by the Commission in ECI rejections is concerned; asserts that the greater inclusion of citizens in the creation of EU policies will increase the credibility of the European institutions;
Amendment 71 #
2016/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. NotesPoints out the concern of citizens in relation to the handling of infringement complaints by the Commission, to the potential initiation of an infringement procedure before the CJEU and to the transparency of the relevant procedures; welcomes the resulting strategic enquiry by the European Ombudsman on the systemic issues encountered in the EU pilot;
Amendment 3 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 a (new)
Citation 17 a (new)
- having regard to the study by its Directorate-General for Internal Policies (Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies) of September 2016 entitled "Evaluation of the Report under Article 16(3) of the CPR",
Amendment 11 #
2016/2148(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Stresses the importance of Rural Development Programmes supporting agricultural employment particularly in terms of quality jobs creation for young people and women; meanwhile this priority encourages to take up farming as a career enabling generational turnover;
Amendment 20 #
2016/2148(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines that the new EAFRD builds on the previous programming periods by providing flexibility to better address specific territorial needs and broadening the objectives to six EU priorities for rural development divided into 18 focus areas, all of which contribute to the three cross-cutting objectives of innovation and environment/climate change mitigation and adaptation; stresses that fostering technological and social innovation in the coming financial periods is a key to sustainable and competitive European agriculture;
Amendment 21 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas cohesion policy is confronted in the current period with many political and economic challenges, deriving both from the financial crisis, leading to a decrease in public investment in many Member States, leaving the ESI funds and co-financing by the Member States as the main tool for public investment in many Member States, and from the migration crisis;
Amendment 24 #
2016/2148(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to use European Structural and Investment Funds to complement the gaps that exist between completed infrastructure projects, particularly in cross-border regions, where these gaps act as a brake on improving economic and social cohesion;
Amendment 26 #
2016/2148(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Takes note of the results envisaged in PAs and OPs, and expects Member States and regional and local authorities to take the right path in order to achieve cohesion policy objectives;
Amendment 27 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas cohesion policy in the programming period 2014-2020 has gained a more focused policy approach through thematic concentration, supporting the priorities of the Juncker Commission;
Amendment 34 #
2016/2148(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that migration has become a structural phenomenon in Europe and calls for further use to be made of ESI Funds in order to promotefor the integration of asylum seekers and refugees into society;
Amendment 35 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that Europe has been going through a difficult phase in both economic and political terms, so that a decentn effective investment policy that is close to citizens is needed more than ever;
Amendment 37 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that Europe has been going through a difficult phase in both economic and political terms, so that a decentfully fledged investment policy that is oriented towards economic growth and employment, and close to citizens, is needed more than ever;
Amendment 40 #
2016/2148(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) has failed to date to systematically address the persisting problem of high levels of youth unemployment, which in several Member States remains at over 40 %; calls for an evaluation of the YEI following a fully fledged assessment of its performance; asks the Commission to take all necessary actions to ensure its continuation and its revision in order to promotesupport the creation of new high-quality jobs and decent social protection for young people;
Amendment 44 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that cohesion policy 2014- 2020 has been thoroughly reworked, requiring a change in mentality and working methods at all levels of governance, but that it is often perceived as a traditional expenditure policy rather than an development and investment policy;
Amendment 53 #
2016/2148(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the current migration crisis poses many challenges for the educational and training systems of the host Member States; calls on the EU institutions to provide, via ESIF and other Union programmes, adequate funding to host countries in order to substantially support the integration of refugees, migrants and asylum seekers into education and training systems; stresses, in this regard, the important role of local and regional authorities;
Amendment 56 #
2016/2148(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls that funds allocated to financing the 'Connecting Europe' facility were depleted in order to recapitalise the European Fund for Strategic Investments; expresses hope thatcalls for these funds willto be used to finance infrastructure projects;
Amendment 58 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes thematic concentration, as it has turned out to be a good tool for creating a focused policy and the resulting greater effectiveness for the EU priorities and the EU 2020 strategy;
Amendment 59 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that an analysis of thematic concentration should point out how the strategic choices of Member States and allocation of resources across TOs meet the specific needs of the territories; regrets that this aspect is less apparent in the Commission's Article 16 report;
Amendment 59 #
2016/2148(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Highlights that the measures of the Rural Development funding directed at fostering innovation and investment in emerging technologies and precision farming should be substantially reinforced in order to enhance the competitiveness of European enterprises in the rural areas;
Amendment 60 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Considers that the results and benefits of cohesion policy need to be put across more effectively, not least in order to restore confidence in the European project;
Amendment 62 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Insists that cohesion policy should continue to have thematic focus, while allowing for; notes that the thematic objectives cover a very large scope which provides some degree of flexibility in order to take on board the specific needs of each region;
Amendment 62 #
2016/2148(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Stresses the need to support rural areas with a sustainable management of soil, water and biodiversity in order to enhance their contribution to the bioeconomy; in addition, farmers need to have measures adapted to respond to increasing challenges such as food security and climate change;
Amendment 63 #
2016/2148(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the need to enhance coordination and to enable and optimise synergies between ESIF and other Union programmes in order to enable and optimise synergies and thereby achieve greater impact and efficiency.;
Amendment 65 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Insists that cohesion policy should continue to have thematic focus, while allowing for some degree of flexibility in order to take on board the specific needs of each region, as well as the specific needs of the least developed regions in less developed Member States;
Amendment 65 #
2016/2148(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that the more flexible structure of the EAFRD was not fully taken advantage of by some Members States and regions which perceived a risk of increased complexity and control requirements therefore asks the Commission to ensure that all parties are in due time informed about the renewed EAFRD structure and to actively facilitate the uptake and visibility of these funds;
Amendment 75 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines, in particular, that consideration should be given to the circumstances of the distinctively urban or rural regions, the so-called ‘lagging regions’ and regions with permanent natural or geographical handicaps (northernmost regions with very low population density, and cross-border, insular, mountainous or outermost regions), which without cohesion policy would hardly be able to catch up with developed countries; recalls in this context that it is important to support new policy challenges, such as immigration, as well as the broadly understood digital dimension of cohesion policy (including ICT and broadband access issues, which are linked to the completion of the Digital Single Market); points to the Energy Union Strategy, as the ESI Funds have an important role to play in its delivery;
Amendment 78 #
2016/2148(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Urges theCalls Member States to efficiently and fully implement EAFRD and avoid gold-plating or adding unnecessary guidelines and procedures which could interfere with efficient implementation of the EAFRD; asks the Commission to continue the simplification of the CAP and, where feasible and necessary, to adapt the basic legislation to this effect; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that sufficient resources are dedicated to successful fulfilment of remaining ex-ante conditionalities;
Amendment 79 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Supports the shift from a focus on infrastructure-related projects towards aWelcomes an increased focus on stimulating the knowledge economy, innovation and social inclusion in cohesion policy;
Amendment 82 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Supports the shift from a focus on infrastructure-related projects towards a focus on stimulating the knowledge economy, innovation and social inclusion, taking into account the specific features of less developed regions;
Amendment 83 #
2016/2148(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for the broader inclusion of local and regional authorities in the processes of designing national general transport plans and allocating resources for infrastructure projects, particularly in cross-border regions.
Amendment 90 #
2016/2148(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Underlines that there is an urgent need for simplification of the CAP and concrete actions have to be made by the Commission within its mandate without delays; in order to make sure the EAFRD funds are taken up and spent efficiently with a view to meeting the goals of the CAP;
Amendment 92 #
2016/2148(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Is concerned that measures to help farmers manage risks and to set up producer groups were not included in many programmes that could support farmers to better react to the increased market volatility;
Amendment 106 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the factNotes that more than two thirds of the Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs) that were adopted in 2014 are relevant to cohesion policy investments and welcomes the fact that they have been taken into account in Member States’ programming priorities;
Amendment 112 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Acknowledges that in the near future CSRs might trigger amendments to ESIF programmes, ensuring support to structural reforms in Member States;
Amendment 113 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. Points out that Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs) and National Reform Programmes (NRPs) represent a clear linkage between the ESI Funds and the processes of the European semester;
Amendment 131 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Notes that the European Commission's Article 16 Report does not include a lot of information about coordination and synergies among different programmes and with instruments of other policy areas;
Amendment 132 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Points out that the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) is presented as a success story when it comes to fast implementation, and against this background asks the Commission to come forward with learning pointsRequests the Commission to come forward with learning points on the implementation of the EFSI which can be used for further reflection for the ESI Funds for the new programming period;
Amendment 137 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Points out that the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) is presented as a success story when it comes to fast implementation, and against this background asks the Commission to come forward with learning points forto enable the ESI Funds forto be put to use more successfully in the new programming period;
Amendment 145 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses that state aid rules apply to ESI Funds, but not to EFSI and Horizon 2020, causing problems in increasing the level of synergy among the instruments; underlines the fact that if there is an ambition to extend EFSI or any similar types of financial instrument, the question of state aid rules needs to be adapted accordingly;funds, programmes and instruments; asks the European Commission to examine possible adjustments of the state aid rules to enhance synergies:
Amendment 152 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
Amendment 169 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. ANotes that one of the main goals of the 2014-2020 programming period is simplification for beneficiaries of ESI Funds and acknowledges that simplification is an important factor in access to funding;
Amendment 170 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Acknowledges that simplification is an important factor in better access to funding;
Amendment 172 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Welcomes the fact that the new modernised regulatory framework of the ESI Funds provides new possibilities for simplification in terms of common eligibility rules, simplified cost options and e-governance; however regrets that the European Commission's Article 16 Report does not include any specific information as regards the use of Simplified Cost Options (SCOs);
Amendment 173 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph 21 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Underlines that there is a need for further efforts to develop the full potential of SCOs in terms of alleviating administrative burden;
Amendment 174 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
Amendment 181 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Recommends that standard procedures be established for drawing up operational programmes and for management, especially where the numerous territorial cooperation programmes are concerned;
Amendment 183 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Notes that the Member States have different administrative cultures, translating into different levels of performancelevels of performance in their policy framework, which the ex-ante conditionalities are helping to overcome;
Amendment 192 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Highlights the European added value of ETC, which should be reflected in an increased level of appropriations for thisin the new cohesion policy objective, to be introduced as soon as practicableprogramming period;
Amendment 193 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Highlights – especially from the point of view of reducing disparities between border regions – the European added value of ETC, which should be reflected in an increased level of appropriations for this cohesion policy objective, to be introduced as soon as practicable;
Amendment 198 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Proposes the establishment of a permanentat a link between RIS3 and interregional cooperation on an EU- wide scale should be encouraged and made possible, preferably in the form of a permanentn element of the INTERREG programme;
Amendment 199 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Is of the opinion that GDPpopulation size might not be the only legitimate indicator for ensuring a fair distribution of money that takes account of specific territorial needs; is of the opinion that many regions in Europe are facing a situation of demographic change, as well as shrinking population numbers in rural areasthe allocation of sources under ETC; is of the opinion that specific territorial characteristics and socio- economic specificities should also be taken into account;
Amendment 218 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32a. Supports the Commission’s new approach of setting up special working groups, that is to say, project teams intended to ensure better management of ESI Funds in Member States, and calls for this approach to be developed further;
Amendment 229 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Recalls that the ETC, which serves the broader principle of territorial cohesion, introduced by the Lisbon Treaty, is not yet properly applicould be improved; therefore encourages all stakeholders involved in negotiations on the future policy to strengthen this dimension of territorial cohesion;
Amendment 241 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37 a (new)
Paragraph 37 a (new)
37a. Expresses the need for a further assessment how ESIF funding contributes to the implementation of structural reforms by Member States, in particular to those which were put forward in CSRs;
Amendment 248 #
2016/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)
Paragraph 38 a (new)
38a. Points out that in some Member States there are still regions whose development is lagging significantly behind and that their specific needs must be taken into account when preparing for the future programming period;
Amendment 13 #
2016/2141(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas access to land is aessential for realisation of a number of human rights;
Amendment 26 #
2016/2141(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas land, as an increasingly scarce and non-renewable asset, should not be treated as an ordinary item of merchandise, and is furthermore doubly threatened both by the loss of agricultural land through soil sealing, urban development and, infrastructure projects and related compensatory measures, and by the concentration of land in the hands of large-scale agricultural undertakings and investors from outside the farming sector;
Amendment 53 #
2016/2141(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas farmland areas are particularly important for water management and the climate, as well as for biodiversity and soil fertility, and areound 20% of European farmland is already suffering as a result of climate change and water and wind soil erosion;
Amendment 58 #
2016/2141(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas land ownership is the best way of ensuring a responsible relationship with the land and sustainable land management, and also fosters identification and a sense of belonging, encouraging people to remain in rural areas; whereas this has an impact on the socio-economic infrastructure of rural areas, and whereas the separation of ownership and possession increases the risk of a division within society, a loss in quality of work and life, and impoverishment;
Amendment 115 #
2016/2141(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
Amendment 163 #
2016/2141(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to create a legal basipublish guidelines on harmonisation of accounting practices in order to ensure the regular collection of data of comparable quality on rent levels and land prices in connection with all sales of farmland and farm shares by agricultural undertakings in all Member States;
Amendment 183 #
2016/2141(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers it sensible to create a uniform, Europe-wide land inventory in which all ownership rights and rights of use in respect of farm land are recorded in an up-to-date and accurate manner - while fully respecting the data protection rights of the parties involved - and presented in a comprehensible form in a publicly accessible digital data bank;
Amendment 250 #
2016/2141(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to shape their land market policy in such a way as to curb the rise in farmland prices and rents; further calls for these prices to be subject to an authorisation procedure which would also apply to mergers, splits and the establishment of foundations; takes the view that thereunderlines that national judicial systems need to protect all parties' rights in view of irregularities with lease contracts as well as that the national authorities should btake stricter checks on lease contracts, a requirement to report irregularities, and the possibility of penalties, since renting is often the first step to purchasingeps to eliminate any loopholes in existing national legislation which make contract abuse possible; furthermore calls on the Member States to comprehensively and effectively address the change of agricultural use of farmland that is related with communal projects regarding infrastructure measures and associated ecological compensation measures;
Amendment 287 #
2016/2141(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 303 #
2016/2141(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Takes the view that 30% of direct payments should be payable on the first hectare, provided that the requirements of Articles 41calls on the Commission to consider ways to strengthen small scale and family farming by an increased anid 42 offor the Dfirect Payments Regulation are complied withst hectares;
Amendment 316 #
2016/2141(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Recommends to that end the adoption of a uniform definition throughout the EU of ‘active farmer’ which is clearly linked to the notion of work on a farm and that makes an accurate distinction between eligible and non- eligible land (e.g. airports, industrial open areas, golf courts);
Amendment 337 #
2016/2141(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Endorses the Commission’s finding that land is a finite resource which is already under much pressure as a result of climate change, soil erosion and over- exploitation, and calls for farmland to be given special protection with a view to compliance with the four fundamental European freedoms, so that the Member States can regulate the sale and letting of agricultural land in the light of social and environmental criteria;
Amendment 11 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the garment industry is one of the most precarious for workersre are many cases of precarious forms of work in the garment industry both within and outside Europe; calls on the flagship initiative, therefore, to put ratification and implementation of ILO conventions and the Decent Work Agenda at its core, with particular focus on those most vulnerable to exploitation;
Amendment 25 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that in many cases voluntary initiatives are not adequately addressing issues such as health and safety, wages, social security and working time;
Amendment 32 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Encourages the EU initiative to promote skills training and lifelong learning, which contributes to economic and social development and women’s empowerment; encourages the EU to use initiatives to promote the education of workers in the field of labour rights, as well as to raise awareness of legal assistance mechanisms for when those rights are violated;
Amendment 68 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that price is still the determining factor in the buying practices of brands and retailers, often at the expense of workers’ welfare; calls for the EU to work with stakeholders to develop a fair and stable pricing mechanism which guarantees that a decent proportion of sales revenue is paid to the workere regular payment of workers’ salaries in the form of a living wage;
Amendment 22 #
2016/2101(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the importance of ensuring consistency between ongoing and future Commission Single Market initiatives and the European Semester process, in particular those involving the Single Market and, Digital Single Market, and Internal Energy Market Strategies;
Amendment 55 #
2016/2101(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Supports the Member States in their endeavours to modernise public administrations and their services, in particular through e-government, and calls for better cross-border cooperation and interoperability of public administrations to the benefit of all citizens;
Amendment 60 #
2016/2101(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that several CSRs focus on skills and labour markets; stresses that the right skills are key to ensuring competitiveness and productivity and output growth; calls on the Commission and the Member States to pursue and adopt digital and lifelong learning programmes as a matter of urgency.
Amendment 20 #
2016/2100(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that competition policy must attach the same importance to defending the interests of agricultural producers as it does to defending consumers’ interests, ensuring that the conditions for competition are fair so as to foster investment, employment and innovation in agricultural markets; highlights, that European farmers should be able to access as well as compete throughout the internal market;
Amendment 21 #
2016/2100(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that competition policy defends consumers' interests but not agricultural producers' interests; stresses that competition policy must attach the same importance to defending the interests of agricultural producers as it does to defending consumers’ interests, ensuring that the conditions for competition are fair so as to foster investment, employment and innovation in agricultural markets;
Amendment 26 #
2016/2100(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Stresses the need to tackle power imbalances between operators in the food supply chain; emphasises that purely voluntary initiatives are very important but inadequate to increase the bargaining power of farmers; believes that EU framework legislation eliminates imbalances and ensures a level playing field within the single market while strengthening the position of farmers in the food supply chain;
Amendment 27 #
2016/2100(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Calls to maintain a market- oriented CAP that respects the single market and open competition while ensuring support in case of crisis or unforeseen events in order to help producers to respond to significant market fluctuations;
Amendment 60 #
2016/2100(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Recalls that since the incomes of primary producers is increasingly determined by their position in the food supply chain, there is a need to promote reinforcement of the capacity for resilience specific to the various supply chains through continued strengthening and improvement of their functioning, in particular, contractualisation and fairer distribution of negotiating powers along the food chain; underlines that it is necessary to foster improvement in supply chain structure and collective approaches as well as to ensure greater powers for inter-branch bodies and producer organisations;
Amendment 75 #
2016/2100(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for simplification of the rules on farmers’ organising collectively, so as to strengthen their negotiating capacity while safeguarding the principles set out in Article 39 TFEU; recalls that producer organizations and producer cooperatives are a fundamental business tool which enables farmers to get better market position as well as to get better incomes;
Amendment 83 #
2016/2100(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Underlines that the vast majority of the 22 000 EU agri-cooperatives are small or medium sized; highlights that since the countries least affected by the agriculture crisis are also countries where farming is better organised, EU policies should be aimed at allowing producer organizations to grow in size and scale in order to be more efficient as well as cost- effective;
Amendment 6 #
2016/2099(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the information currently made available to citizens and to the budgetary authority on financial instruments lacks completeness, timeliness and exploitability for making informed decisions on budgetary allocations, future EU financial rules and the future EU financial framework; expects the EIB to contribute actively to the EU budget’s legibility, given its unique expertise and position; feels that it is particularly necessary to set up ‘information channels’ leading to regional and local government bodies so that they can receive higher-quality information in a timely manner on financial possibilities;
Amendment 32 #
2016/2099(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Encourages the EIB to continue to support sustainable, safe, climate-friendly and innovative transport; underlines that it is the European Parliament’s priority to provide sufficient funding for projects with European added value, including the cross- border transport links, and not only the TEN-T corridor;
Amendment 53 #
2016/2099(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the importance of geographical balance in investments with EIB involvement, and expects the EIB and the Commission to deliver appropriate technical and administrative assistance to project preparation in countries that need it; stresses the importance of including local and regional authorities in this process;
Amendment 65 #
2016/2099(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the importance in combating climate change of the goals set by COP 21 with regard to transport; underlines that the financial means should be available to bring about a modal shift from road to rail and waterborne and inland waterway transport; insists also that attention should be paid to investment in clean power for transport; emphasises the use of sea corridors;
Amendment 71 #
2016/2099(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission and the EIB to support investment in sustainable urban mobility in order to reduce the air pollution and congestion in European cities; calls, in this sense, on the local and regional authorities to develop urban and interurban mobility;
Amendment 15 #
2016/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Acknowledges that the major EIB shareholders, i.e. Germany, France, the UK, Italy and Spain, received more than 50 % of financing in 2015, while the new Member States received less than 20 %; recognises that this financial share represents roughly the size in population of the major shareholders countries; asks the EIB and the Commission to provide more technical assistance to those Member States havingwhich have a lower share in totalof EIB financing;
Amendment 40 #
2016/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 50 #
2016/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the EIF efforts to make the SME initiative work in currently six countries (Spain, Italy, Bulgaria, Finland, Romania, Malta) which are expected to benefit from about 8.5bn of new SME loans at favourable terms; appreciates therefore the proposal of the EC to prolong the SME initiative until 2020;
Amendment 68 #
2016/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the EIB and the Commission to step up their provision ofincrease their support and advice for local and regional authorities and SMEs, in the interests ofand to simplifying the access to EIB finance and blending grants with loans and financial instruments.
Amendment 1 #
2016/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Expresses the need for the Commission to publish its second Anti- Corruption Report, which was due for publication in early 2016, for the sake of the credibility of the European institutions’ work;
Amendment 11 #
2016/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates its call on the Council to resume immediately the negotiations with Parliament on the Directive on the protection of the financial and other interests of the Union (PIF Directive); recalls that the PIF Directive is an essential instrument in fighting fraud, corruption, money laundering and other illegal activities affecting the EU’s financial interests; considers that, in the light of the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-105/14, Taricco and Others, the inclusion of VAT in the scope of the directive is inevitable;
Amendment 14 #
2016/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that adoption of the Directive on the protection of the financial and other interests of the Union (PIF Directive) is an essential prerequisite for the adoption of the proposed Regulation on the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), which would establish a Union prosecution office to investigate, prosecute and bring to court the perpetrators of criminal offences affecting the EU’s financial and other interests;
Amendment 20 #
2016/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates that the EPPO must be fully independent, endowed with sufficient resources to act effectively, efficiently and swiftly, and required to act at all times in full compliance with the procedural rights of suspects and accused persons; stresses the need to ensure that the division of competences between the EPPO and Member States is clear and consistent with the role of the EPPO as a Union body; points out that establishing the EPPO will require effective coordination with Eurojust, Europol and OLAF.
Amendment 54 #
2016/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Expresses its concern regarding the ability of cooperation between all the control structures in Member States; calls on the Commission and Member States to support initiatives to strengthen the capacity of coordination between control structures, especially those that act in the first line of control in relationship with the beneficiaries.
Amendment 56 #
2016/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Considers disturbing the poor communication between Member States and OLAF; Invites the Commission and Member States to promote initiatives that lead to improved communication between public structures but also of civil society in EU Member States and OLAF; stresses that this is important for combating corruption in the Member States.
Amendment 57 #
2016/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Underlines the need to conduct campaigns to strengthen the public confidence in OLAF. Calls on the Commission and Member States to promote the actions of OLAF; stresses that this is important to strength OLAF capacity to cope with the increased number of investigations in order to combat fraud in the EU.
Amendment 58 #
2016/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 d (new)
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6d. Recommends to improve transparency at all levels of management on projects implemented with external funds; highlights that this is important to protect the EU budget.
Amendment 59 #
2016/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 e (new)
Paragraph 6 e (new)
6e. Expresses its concern regarding the disparity between the information received by OLAF from the Member States, from public sources and private sources; calls on the European Commission to support initiatives aimed to increase the collection of public information and calls on Member States to increase the quality of data provided.
Amendment 60 #
2016/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 f (new)
Paragraph 6 f (new)
6f. Recalls that the simplification of procedures for the beneficiaries in order to access ESI funds is required; call on the European Commission to support initiatives to simplify these procedures; stresses that this is crucial for preventing irregularities as fraud and corruption.
Amendment 15 #
2016/2096(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on governments of developing countries to mainstream gender in mental health policy, and to develop policies and programmes that address both the specific needs of women for mental health treatment and the social origins of psychological distress; sstrongly believes that better balance in gender roles and obligations, income security, access to education, labour market integration, the development of social safety nets and poverty reduction would further redress gender disparities in mental health;
Amendment 30 #
2016/2096(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes with concern that the increase in offshoring medicine testing to Africa and other underdeveloped regions may result in serious ethical violations; points out that not having access to affordable healthcare or health insurance gives vulnerable people, particularly women, no other choice than to participate in clinical trials in order to receive medical treatment;
Amendment 49 #
2016/2094(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas development policy is a crucial aspect of the European Union’s external policy; whereas the Union is the largest development donor in the world and, together with its Member States, it provides more than half of official development assistance globally;
Amendment 230 #
2016/2094(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Stresses the need for the better integration of partner countries into financial allocation and planning processes;
Amendment 330 #
2016/2094(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 a (new)
Paragraph 41 a (new)
41a. Recalls the growing role played by sports in development and peace through the promotion of tolerance and a culture of mutual respect, as well as the contribution sports make to empowering women and young people, individuals and communities, as well as to health, education and social inclusion;
Amendment 332 #
2016/2094(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 b (new)
Paragraph 41 b (new)
41b. Stresses that sports must play a stronger role in development policies and that greater investment must be made in sports programmes and infrastructure in developing countries;
Amendment 47 #
2016/2079(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Highlights the importance of coherence between fisheries, development and trade policies, and environmental protection standards;
Amendment 120 #
2016/2079(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Stresses the importance of small- scale coastal fishing in view of its contribution to food security, local economies and employment of both men and women;
Amendment 121 #
2016/2079(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14 b. Stresses the importance of including women in the fisheries sector and secondary supporting industries;
Amendment 128 #
2016/2079(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Points out that small-scale fishermen constitute the most socially vulnerable group in the fisheries sector and that for this reason — as well as for their contribution to preserving fishing traditions and cultural heritage ― a special approach must be taken to them;
Amendment 12 #
2016/2078(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
C a. Highlights the importance of the equine sector due to its vital contribution to the environmental, economic and social development in rural areas;
Amendment 16 #
2016/2078(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the estimated 7 million equidae in the EU perform hugely varied roles, from racing and competition animals to pets, working animals in transport, tourism, forestry and agriculture as well as leisure animals in amateur sports and education, sources of milk and meat, research animals, and wild and semi-feral animals, and whereas they may perform several of these roles during their lives;
Amendment 26 #
2016/2078(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
D a. Whereas the regulatory environment on EU level varies among Member States and that existent legislation is implemented differently within the EU which leads to distortion of competition and a loss of animal welfare;
Amendment 83 #
2016/2078(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recognises the considerable economic, environmental and social contribution equidae make throughout the EU;
Amendment 125 #
2016/2078(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to commission a Eurostat study to analyse the economic, enviromental and social impact of all aspects of the equid sector;
Amendment 129 #
2016/2078(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to actively support the development of guides to good practice, bydevelop a European Guideline on Good Practice in the Equine Sector drawn up in consultation with stakeholders and organizations of the equine sector and based on existent guides; calls the commission to ensure equal implementation of the EU guideline, releasinge resources for translation of such a documents and to assisting with theirits distribution;
Amendment 147 #
2016/2078(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to support the production and dissemination of information on how to meet the needs of equidae, whatever their role, based around the ‘five freedoms’ and covering the entirety of an equid’s life; calls also on the Commission towhen setting up its European Guideline on Good Practice in the Equine Sector to consider the multifunctional role of equines by includeing guidance on responsible breeding and the benefits of equid sterilisation, work in tourism, agriculture and forest, species- appropriate transport and slaughter; recommends that suchthis guidanceline should be disseminated to breeders, equid societies, farms, stables, sanctuaries, transporters and slaughterhouses, and that it should be accessible in a variety of formats, including online;
Amendment 4 #
2016/2076(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the protection of endangered animal and plant species is an issue of global interest, which requires cooperation between all nations, includingespecially those of the EU;
Amendment 16 #
2016/2076(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Urges the Commission to acknowledge and pay due attention to IUU fishing carried out in Europe and its immediate neighbourhood (such as the fishing of glass-eels and sturgeon and damage to coral);
Amendment 21 #
2016/2076(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the principle of effectiveness of public action requires the Member States to coordinate their actions if endangered animal and plant species are to be protected successfully;
Amendment 23 #
2016/2076(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates the need for continuing scientific research and technological development of fishing gear, so as to prevent by-catches and alleviate pressure in the form of catches on stocks of organisms that are the target of trafficking;
Amendment 27 #
2016/2076(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas wildlife trafficking is a serious and growing threat to global security, political stability, economic development, local livelihoods and the rule of law, and therefore requires a strategic, coordinated EU approach involving all the actors concerned;
Amendment 30 #
2016/2076(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the importance of maintaining the traceability of fisheries products and ensuring that they are properly labelled;
Amendment 44 #
2016/2076(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission and the Member State authorities to step up their cooperation in the fight against cross- border wildlife trafficking, particularly between enforcement agencies, including police, customs, judicial, and sanitary and trade inspection authorities;
Amendment 45 #
2016/2076(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Supports alternative sustainable production methods in order to reduce pressure on wild organisms (e.g. aAquaculture) and calls for appropriate financial support to be granted to production of this kind;
Amendment 49 #
2016/2076(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Considers awareness-raising and environmental literacy initiatives to be essential and believes that education systems and the media have a key role to play;
Amendment 64 #
2016/2076(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the EU to take its own measures and support other initiatives promotensuring the development of alternative livelihoods for local communities close to the wildlife concerned and contributing to the recovery and conservation of endangered wildlife populations;
Amendment 71 #
2016/2076(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for the EU, as a matter of urgency, to address corruption and the shortcomings of international governance measures across the wildlife trafficking chain and take international cooperation measures; calls for the EU and its Member States to engage with partner countries through the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) and other fora to tackle the problem in source, transit and destination markets; calls on all Member States to fully comply with the provisions of UNCAC;
Amendment 78 #
2016/2076(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Recognises the need to provide assistance and guidance to source countries concerning enforcement and judicial procedures at local, regional and national level; calls for the EU to enableprovide for training, specialised equipment and expertise to be provided where necessary;
Amendment 96 #
2016/2076(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Urges the Member States to ensure that enforcement agencies, prosecution services and national judiciaries have the necessary specialist, material, financial and human resources to combat wildlife crime;
Amendment 102 #
2016/2076(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines the need for inter- agency cooperation and calls on the Member States to provide Europol with continuous and relevant intelligence and data; urges Europol to consider wildlife crime in the next EU Serious and Organised Crime Threat Assessment (SOCTA); calls for the establishment of a specialised Wildlife Crime Unit within Europol, with transnational powers and responsibilities and sufficient specialist, material, financial and human resources, enabling centralised information and analysis and coordinated enforcement strategies and investigations;
Amendment 116 #
2016/2076(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Urges the Member States to comply with the UN Convention against Transnational Organised Crime (UNTOC) as a basis for international action and mutual legal assistance and as a key step towards a common coordinated approach to combating wildlife crime; deeply regrets, in this connection, the fact that eleven Member States have not yet implemented UNTOC;
Amendment 123 #
2016/2076(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Member States to recognisinvestigate the scale of online wildlife trafficking and to build capacity in order to ensure that channels exist to trigger assistance from cross-border units specialised in cybercrime;
Amendment 138 #
2016/2076(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to step up dialogue and operational cooperation with source, transit and destination countries in the wildlife trafficking supply chain and to provide them with technical assistance and diplomatic support;
Amendment 162 #
2016/2076(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Notes that CITES, the EU Timber Regulation and the EU IUU regulatory framework are tools for regulating international wildlife trade; is concerned, however, about regulatory gaps with regard to species and actors; calls, therefore, for the EU to review and amend the existing legislative framework with a view to prohibiting the making available and placing on the market, transport, acquisition and possession of wildlife that has been illegally harvested or traded in third countries; considers that such legislation would harmonise and simplify the existing EU framework and that the transnational impact of such legislation can play a key role in reducing and combating global wildlife trafficking;
Amendment 178 #
2016/2076(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Calls on the Member States to harmonise and tighten up the penalties to be imposed on end buyers of wildlife that has been the subject of unlawful and criminal activity;
Amendment 10 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges the initial results of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) to mobilise private investments; recalls that the EFSI must also contribute to economic, social and territorial cohesion and that efforts are needed to enhance synergies and complementarity between the EFSI and European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIFs) and other EU programmes; underlines the importance of ensuring additionality of the EFSI with respect to other EIB initiatives and EU- funded programs;
Amendment 28 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the publication of the Commission’s new guidelines of 22 of February 2016 on combining ESIFs and the EFSI; takes note, however, that the number of existing synergies between EFSI and ESIFs funds is still extremely low and calls on the Commission, the EIB, the national promotional banks and institutions (NPBI), national governments and the managing authorities to accelerate the design and implementation of further synergies;
Amendment 41 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the Commission, the EIB, the Committee of the Regions, national governments and the managing authorities, including those at regional level, should better cooperate to ensure that more integrated ESIF-EFSI projects are put forward to boost territorial development and cohesion policies;
Amendment 58 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that it is essential to ensure a geographical balance of EFSI projects, taking account of the different economic development of the regions and the territorial diversity of the Member States; highlights the importance of also developing cross-border projects that could deliver a high European added value and cohesion;
Amendment 78 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the selection of EFSI financing operations and the managing of projects should be more transparent, accountable, based on defined criteria and involve local and regional stakeholders at an early stage; stresses that the European Investment Advisory Hub (EIAH) and the EFSI investment committee should use the expertise of regional and local authorities in order to promote integrated ESIF-EFSI projects; with a view to this, the EIAH should play an active role in enabling even more local and regional authorities to make the most of the EFSI;
Amendment 84 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises the need to strengthen the national and regional platform to support the coordination and synergies between EU funds and other programmes;
Amendment 84 #
2016/2061(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights the fact that all people have the right to a decent and sufficient public pension, and recalls that the Union recognises the entitlement to social security benefits and social services which provide protection in the event of old age or dependency;
Amendment 228 #
2016/2061(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Stresses the importance of local and regional authorities in the field of social security and social services.
Amendment 42 #
2016/2059(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Member States to ensure implementation of Directive 2014/94/EU on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure, within the prescribed time limits, in particular as regards the establishment of LNG refuelling points, at least along the existing TEN-T Core Network, to ensure that LNG heavy-duty motor vehicles can circulate throughout the Union, and at maritime and inland ports to enable LNG inland waterway vessels or sea-going ships to circulate throughout the TEN-T Core Network; recalls that Member States should assess, in their national policy frameworks, in close cooperation with their regional authorities, the need to install refuelling points for LNG in ports outside the TEN-T Core Network; calls on the Commission to design a financial instrument for supporting the construction of LNG refuelling points inside and outside the TEN-T Core Network;
Amendment 44 #
2016/2059(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that LNG and gas storage are an important part of the Energy Union and should contribute towards ending any kind of energy isolation of the EU Member States and regions; highlights the need to support the most vulnerable countries in order to diversify their sources and routes of supply; calls for the countries of South- East Europe, and candidate countries in particular, to be included in activities of that type;
Amendment 63 #
2016/2059(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Welcomes the fact that important LNG projects (e.g. North-South corridor) are being defined as projects of common interest; calls on the Commission to fully include Balkan countries when planning the further reconstruction of gas pipeline and TEN-E network to ensure a key role of the EU energy sector in the region;
Amendment 72 #
2016/2059(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to present cost-effective solutions for the distribution and storage of LNG in the Union’s outermost regions and for adequate financing; stresses the need to look at all existing solutions for the storage and distribution of LNG, in particular in island regions, taking into consideration the potential evolution in demand for that fuel; calls on the Commission to encourage a process of identifying the storages of regional importance; in order to provide security, affordability and sustainability of these storages, the Commission is called upon to ensure the necessary financial help to member states to develop the necessary infrastructure and improve their existing capacity in a timely manner;
Amendment 110 #
2016/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses thatCalls on the Commission and the Member States, in order to avoid stranded assets, to carry out a careful analysis of LNG supply alternatives and options in a regional perspective should be carried out before deciding about new infrastructure in order to guarantee the most efficient use of existing infrastructure;
Amendment 117 #
2016/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the importance ofCalls on the Member States to work in regional cooperation when building new LNG terminals and underlines that Member States with access to the sea should cooperate closely with landlocked countries; calls on the Commission to coordinate the above activity;
Amendment 192 #
2016/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on local and regional authorities to take the necessary steps towards the thermomodernisation of existing public or residential buildings with low thermal comfort or comfort cooling;
Amendment 218 #
2016/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that in dense urban agglomerations it is imperative that the use of individual heating systems that depend on fossil fuels be restricted and replaced with large-scale local and/or regional cogeneration systems that produce heat and electricity;
Amendment 333 #
2016/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Takes the view that heat exchangers can play a vital role in local and regional cooling via the expansion of liquefied natural gas in LNG terminals;
Amendment 408 #
2016/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Takes the view that consumers must be made fullyprovided with a high standard of information to make them aware of the technological and economic benefits of new heating and cooling systems, so as to enable them to make the best possible choices;
Amendment 44 #
2016/2057(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Supports competition in generic medicines, which allows broadetter access to medicines in LMICs; calls, in particular, for the EU and the Member States to support actively governments that use the available legal measures, including TRIPS safeguards and flexibilities, to protect and promote public health; calls also for the EU to immediately stop targeting countries such as India that have implemented progressive TRIPS- compliant IP policies which promote access to medicines, through its watch-list of ‘priority countries’;
Amendment 56 #
2016/2057(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that, without information based on transparency oft research and development costs to originator companies and information on the actual prices paid for medicines across the EU, any discussion or conclusions on fair medicine prices remains impossible; recalls the Commission’s commitment to greater transparency of EU positions, specific legal proposals, and negotiating texts in the TTIP negotiations;
Amendment 1 #
2016/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Heading 1
Heading 1
on the role of whistle-blowers in the protection of EU’s financialpublic interests
Amendment 2 #
2016/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- whereas the protection of EU public interests covers abuse of power, infringement of regulations, directives, and other EU provisions, and other actions posing a direct threat to the EU public interest,
Amendment 3 #
2016/2055(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Maintains that whistle-blowers play an essential role in helping Member State and EU institutions and bodies to deter any breaches of the principle of integrity and misuse of power that might violate the rule of law at European and, national, regional, and local levels, harm the economy and undermine the trust of citizens in democratic institutions and processes;
Amendment 10 #
2016/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas in the context of the discharge procedure, Parliament needs as much information as possible relating to any such irregularities brought to light;
Amendment 14 #
2016/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas whistle-blowers therefore play an important role in detecting and reporting irregularities in respect of the expenditures relating to the EU budget and other irregularities affecting the EU's public interest;
Amendment 36 #
2016/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital N a (new)
Recital N a (new)
Na. whereas whistle-blower protection is a fairly new legal field and whereas most of the laws, provisions, and rules have been have been adopted within the last 20 years, and the best solution for protecting whistle-blowers is still being sought;
Amendment 45 #
2016/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates its call on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal establishing an effective and comprehensive European whistle-blower protection programme and, in particular, calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal before the end of this year protecting whistle-blowers as part of the necessary measures in the fields of the prevention of and fight against fraud affecting the financial and other public interests of the Union, with a view to affording effective and equivalent protection in the Member States and in all the Union’s institutions, bodies, offices and agencies;
Amendment 49 #
2016/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that whistle-blowing relating to the financial and other public interests of the Union is the disclosure or reporting ofreporting of wrongdoing that has been uncovered to persons or organisations that might be affected by such wrongdoing, including, but not limited to, corruption, fraud, conflicts of interest and, acts to cover up any of these, and other actions posing a direct threat to the EU public interest;
Amendment 59 #
2016/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Maintains that 'whistle-blowing' is a noble, generous act in which a person puts his or her career at risk in order to prevent potentially harmful unlawful activities;
Amendment 70 #
2016/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Considers it essential that future activities in the 'whistle-blower' field should all particularly emphasise the importance of incentives, that is to say, offering extra reasons and encouragement for employees to report such irregularities as might have come to their notice;
Amendment 86 #
2016/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission, and in particular on the European Anti-Fraud Office, to similarly set up procedures for receiving and protecting whistle-blowers who provide information on irregularities relating to the financial and public interests of the Union;
Amendment 88 #
2016/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for a package of measures to educate stakeholders in order to familiarise them with their rights and with the possibilities and procedures for reporting irregularities that have come to their notice;
Amendment 10 #
2016/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the uncontrolled and excessive use of wild animal and plant species represents the second most serious threat to their survival in the wild, immediately following the destruction of habitats;
Amendment 11 #
2016/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas according to estimates, the illegal trade in wild flora and fauna is the fourth most profitable area of criminal activity, with an estimated turnover of as much as EUR 20 billion;
Amendment 25 #
2016/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Expresses concern at the fact that it is the EU which, alongside the USA, makes up the greatest marketplace for illegal products of the trade in protected flora and fauna;
Amendment 38 #
2016/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes the positive role played by non-governmental organisations in the fight against the illegal trade in wild flora and fauna, both in the EU and on the territory of the third countries in which those wild flora and fauna originate;
Amendment 82 #
2016/2054(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Recommends that the Member States ban, with no exceptions, the trade in objects made from illegal wild flora and fauna; notes that in France, trading in ivory objects made earlier than 1975 is authorised, which leaves lots of room for manoeuvre for the falsification of documents for newly produced objects;
Amendment 33 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises the negative effects of association agreements on the economies of ACP countries; takes the view that the new partnership will need to be based on developing the countries’ productive capacities, completing the most advantageous regional integration processes, protecting and encouraging traditional agriculture, and combating land grabbing, the privatisation of national natural resources and public services, and over- exploitation;
Amendment 63 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Invites ACP countries to audit their debts with a view to their complete elimination, and invites them to claim reparations for the spoliation of natural resources by foreign multinationals and others, and for the wars that have been sparked; supports the United Nations working group on an international framework for sovereign debt restructuring;
Amendment 5 #
2016/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that, with around EUR 200 billion of annual military spending, European countries are unable to avert the deterioration of their security environment and to weigh on global affairs because of fragmented defence policies that create inefficiencies and hinder their force projection; believes that a more integration of thed framework for defence and standardised defence force functionality and equipment could result in significant savings, additional capabilities and more sustained investment; recalls that, according to ‘cost of non- Europe’ estimates, annual efficiency gains in this area could range between EUR 26 billion in the less optimistic scenarios and EUR 130 billion;
Amendment 11 #
2016/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that, at a time when public support for the EU is being called into question in some Member States, defence is an area where the individual and collective benefits of more Europe can be easily demonstrated, especially regarding the likelypossible challenges to the EU’s standing as a strategic actor following Brexitif Brexit were to be implemented;
Amendment 18 #
2016/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that common funding has a key role to play in incentivising the use of mechanisms whose potential remains largely untapped, such as permanent structured cooperation and EU Battlegroups; calls, therefore, for the Athena mechanism to be expanded and for consideration to be given to alternative funding for military expenditure in order to do away withmodify the ‘costs lie where they fall’ principle; stresses that, in this context, the EU budget should be able to fund the administrative costs of establishing and operating strategic structures, such as joint operational headquarters; calls also for more ambitious civilian missions that are better integrated in the policy cycle and in the range of available instruments;
Amendment 32 #
2016/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that the time is ripe for unfreezing the budget of the European Defence Agency, and is convinced that more should be done to close the investment gap in defence capabilities, including via EU innovative financing; endorses, finally, the proposal for a ‘European Semester’ on defence, whereby Member States would coordinate their defence spending and investment plans in an open process involving the European Parliament and the national parliaments.
Amendment 20 #
2016/2047(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Regrets the proposed cuts for intervention in the agricultural markets, especially for milk and milk products compared to 2016; sees a continued financial effort being necessary to combat the crisis in the milk market; asks the Commission to extend emergency measures related to both sales difficulties and consequences of the Russian embargo; is concerned that further markets intervention will be necessary;
Amendment 71 #
2016/2045(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – point 1 (new)
Paragraph 9 – point 1 (new)
(1) Calls for provision to be made for ad hoc adjustment and amendment of operational programmes under the Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) with a view to creating synergy with EUSF resources in affected areas;
Amendment 11 #
2016/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas renewable bio-energies produced within the agricultural sector make a large contribution to the EU’s achievement of crucial targets such as mitigating the effects of climate change, reducing the EU’s energy dependency on energy imports, creating jobs and improving incomes in the sector;
Amendment 13 #
2016/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Insists on the importance of promoting and encouraging the development of on- farm sources of alternative energy, which can have a significant positive impact on climate change and on creating new green jobs in rural areas as well as supporting the economic and social development of such areas;
Amendment 33 #
2016/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the importance of modernising the agricultural production in Europe, to be able to reduce the negative impact of agriculture on the environment and contribute to an increased use of renewable energy sources;
Amendment 38 #
2016/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the importance of supporting EU framework programmes for research into relation tonewable energies for agriculture and forestry in general and, in particular, as regards refined biofuels, rational use of biomass and the development of fast- growing energy crops; points also to the importance of research into the grid integration and storage of decentrally generated renewable energies;
Amendment 62 #
2016/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls the importance of promoting local renewable energy cooperatives in both rural and urban areas in order to increase public and private support for renewable energy;
Amendment 66 #
2016/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines the importance of the transport sector for the EU´s rural areas, notes that the transport sector is the sector that has seen least progress in using renewable energy sources with only 5,4 % renewable energy in 2013 compared to the 10% EU target for 2020; calls therefore on Member States to intensify their efforts in order to meet these targets in due time and to consider strengthening the link between the transport and electricity markets by promoting electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles in order to meet these targets;
Amendment 69 #
2016/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Stresses that the potential for renewables in rural areas in the Balkan and Mediterranean regions is under- exploited and calls on the Union to increase its support for the development of the market for renewable energy in such regions;
Amendment 72 #
2016/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 e (new)
Paragraph 5 e (new)
5e. Encourages the Commission and the Member States to recognize the under- exploited potential of extracting renewable energy from the sea as well as the benefits of using marine resources in biogas production for the agricultural sector;
Amendment 73 #
2016/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 f (new)
Paragraph 5 f (new)
5f. Encourages the Commission and the Member States to consider undertaking measures aimed at facilitating the selling of surpluses from agriculture-based renewable energy production;
Amendment 35 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the EU is now surrounded by an arc of instability, as large parts of the Middle East and North Africa are engulfed in ethno-religious conflicts and proxy wars and terrorist groups such as ISISDaesh and the Jabhat al-Nusra Front proliferate throughout the region, while an aggressive, revisionist Russia continues to violate its neighbours’ sovereignty and openly challenges the European security order;
Amendment 40 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas profound changes are happening in international security landscape as societal, economic, technological and geopolitical trends point to the growing vulnerability of the world's population to shocks and stresses, including: interstate conflicts, natural disasters, extreme weather events, water crises, state collapse and cyber-attacks;
Amendment 56 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the recent terrorist acts in European cities committed by radical jihadists linked to ISISDaesh are part of that group’s comprehensive strategy, complementing a land war in Syria and Iraq, an economic war aimed at the tourism industry in North Africa, as well as online propaganda and cyber-attacks;
Amendment 93 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the current crisis is also an opportunity for the EU if it is used to make the EU work better; recalls that European citizens see an effective common foreign and security policy as a priority area of action for the EU and that this is one of the areas where European cooperation can yield most value added; emphasises, therefore, that Member States must change their mentality since nowadays thinking about foreign policy and security in a narrow minded national perspective is obsolete; is convinced that no single Member State alone is able to tackle any of the challenges we face today; is firmly convinced that EU's vulnerability is a direct outcome of the lack of integration as well as lack of coordination; urges Member States to finally show sufficient levels of political will and trust in one another to make it possible to use the tools at hand in a concerted manner in order to pursue our interests and values; reiterates that the EU can only be a strong global player on an equal footing with other major powers if all Member States speak with one voice and act together in the framework of a strong EU foreign and security policy;
Amendment 114 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that an effective implementation of the EU Global Strategy presented by the VP/HR in June 2016 is not possible without strong commitment, ownership, political will and leadership from the Member States; highlights that the appropriate resources need to be allocated to the implementation of this strategy, in particular in the crucial area of security and defence; emphasises practical and financial benefits of further integrations of European defence capabilities and notes various ongoing initiatives which should be placed into a wider frame to establish a smart roadmap that will lead to a European Defence Union; calls on the Member States to follow through with concrete measures as a matter of urgency;
Amendment 133 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Is of the opinion that the Global Strategy should be revised regularly, in synchrony with the electoral cycle and the entry into office of each new Commission, in order to check if its objectives and priorities still fit with the challenges and thare in compliance with shared intereasts;
Amendment 144 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Highlights that EU external action needs to be based on the three pillars that could be defined as the ‘three Ds’: Defence, Development and Diplomacy; is of the opinion that its paramount objective must be strengthening the EU's resilience;
Amendment 157 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Emphasises that the EU must strengthen its security and defence capabilities, as it can only use its full potential as a global power if it combines its unrivalled soft power with hard power; recalls that stronger civilian and military capacities are key elements for the EU to fully respond to crises, build the resilience of partners and protect Europe; notes that since power politics is again dominating international relations, defence and deterrence capabilities are critical for our leverage in diplomatic talks; in this regard, reiterates that the Common Security and Defence Policy needs to be strengthened and an integrated defence market should be developed, as the only realistic way to strengthen our defence capabilities in a time of budgetary constraints is to increase synergies by stepping up defence cooperation;
Amendment 174 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Urges Council to resolve standing problems with financing hybrid missions and to initiate establishment of start-up fond for the urgent financing of the initial phases of military operations; calls for more flexibility in the EU's financial rules in order to support its ability to respond to crises and for the implementation of existing Lisbon Treaty provisions; calls for a reform of the Athena mechanism to extend its scope for all costs related, first to rapid reaction operations, deployment of the EU Battlegroups, then to all military operations;
Amendment 191 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 – introductory part
Paragraph 10 – introductory part
10. Takes the view that it is of crucial importance that the instruments provided by the Treaty of Lisbon be finally implemented, notably Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO); welcomes the joint paper by the defence ministers of France and Germany on the ‘renewal of the CSDP’, and fully supports its aim of taking a positive decision on the establishment of PESCO at the November 2016 Foreign Affairs and Defence Council; urges all Member States to involve actively in the implementation of offered instruments; calls on the VP/HR to take the lead on this initiative, as well as on other recent proposals for strengthening the CSDP with a view to paving the way for further ambitious decisions on the CSDP to be taken at the November Foreign Affairs and Defence Council and the December European Council, including the following:
Amendment 200 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 – indent 1
Paragraph 10 – indent 1
- creating a permanent civil-military headquarters, which would strengthen strategic and operational planning, enhance civil-military cooperation and improve the EU’s ability to react speedily to crises; the progressive installation of a single command for the integrated military forces and the display of an EU insignia;
Amendment 213 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 – indent 3
Paragraph 10 – indent 3
- extending the common financing of CSDP operations, including through aurgent and thorough review of the Athena mechanism;
Amendment 221 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the Roadmap and the commitments of the Bratislava summit; commends launch of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency;
Amendment 231 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the ongoing work on the European Defence Action Plan and the Commission’s efforts to maximise defence cooperation, including through incentives in areas such as research, transport, space, cyber, energy and industrial policies; notes the proposal by the French President for a European Security and Defence Fund, and supports the development of new and innovative financing and investment concepts, like establishment of start-up fund for the urgent financing of the initial phases of military operations, including through the European Investment Bank; supports the proposals for a ‘European Semester for Defence’ and calls on the VP/HR to present concrete proposals to this effect; commends the European Defence Agency’s role in fostering and coordinating capability development, and calls for its strengthening, notably by increasing its budget;
Amendment 245 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Recognises the increasing interdependence between internal and external security, and takes the view that the current security challenges require a profound overhaul of our security policies with a view to creating a consistent and unified policy covering both internal and external dimensions, including aspects such as counter-terrorism, cybersecurity, energy security, hybrid threats, strategic communication, and critical infrastructures; urges Member States’ security services to enhance coordination, and calls on all Member States to comply with their legal obligation to share intelligence with Europol and Eurojust in the fight against terrorism and organised crime, and to that goal urges formation of European Intelligence Agency with the mission and capability to implement a de facto transversal intelligence network within the Member States allowing the European Union to react in a comprehensive and coordinated way to emerging threats; urges the EU to further strengthen its cooperation with third countries in the fight against terrorism;
Amendment 280 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Emphasises that the security of EU Member States is undividable and that in line with Article 42(7) TEU all Member States must enjoy the same level of security, and therefore should provide and partake equally by its proportion in security of the EU, and should meet given commitments; believes it is crucial to strengthen the European security architecture, which is based on the Helsinki Final Act of 1975 and which has been severely damaged by Russia’s illegal military interventions in Crimea and eastern Ukraine;
Amendment 300 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Takes the view that it is time to define a new, more realistic strategy for the EU’s relations with Russia, based on credible deterrence but also on dialogue in areas of common interest; stresses that sanctions have proven to be the most effective means for deterring Russian aggression; recalls that the full implementation of the Minsk agreement is a prerequisite for the suspension of sanctions; insists that the EU should consider imposing further sanctions in case Russia continues to violate international law; believes it is in the common interest of the EU and Russia to achieve a better relationship, provided international law is applied; recalls that obeying international law without exceptions is of utmost importance for the EU;
Amendment 358 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Observes as the building resilience should be one of the main goals of CFSP it requires comprehensive approach of different sectors which challenge traditional approaches to foreign and security policy with use of wide range of diplomatic, security, defence, economic, trade, development and humanitarian instruments;
Amendment 427 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Recognises Turkey’s role as an important partner in solving the Syrian conflict and the fight against Da’esh; strongly condemns the attempted military coup against the democratically elected government of Turkey as well as post-coup retaliations against liberal part of society; encourages the Turkish government to protect the constitutional order and principle of secularity, while underlining the importance of respect for the rule of law and, independence of the judiciary and freedom of speech in the aftermath of the coup, in cooperation with the Council of Europe;
Amendment 95 #
2016/2034(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that volatility must be accepted as a long-term given and that those operators who are most exposed must be supported in order to lessen its negative effects;
Amendment 144 #
2016/2034(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Considers it important to retain farm subsidies to allow future planning certainty and thus a secure income to farmers in times of price volatilities;
Amendment 258 #
2016/2034(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. points out that the last CAP reform introduced three new types of risk management instruments; notes that the uptake of these tools in the programming period 2014–2020 by Member States had been limited;
Amendment 267 #
2016/2034(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16 b. notes that agricultural production is highly subjected to extern influences such as natural disasters; calls on the Commission and Member States to enhance research and development on resistance mechanisms to prevent production and income losses to farmers;
Amendment 271 #
2016/2034(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 c (new)
Paragraph 16 c (new)
16 c. calls on the Commission to eliminate implementation difficulties in order to enhance the use of these risk management tools and thus increase farmer's ability to better cope with price volatilities;
Amendment 373 #
2016/2034(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Recommends that European agricultural price observatories, covering the entire chain, from the producer price to the final selling price, be established for the various sectors of the industry, to provide ongoing, segment-by- segment analysis of agricultural markets, with the involvement of economic stakeholders, and to make relevant data and forecasts available at regular intervals;
Amendment 2 #
2016/2033(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the protection of the financial interests of the European Union and the Member States is a key element of the Union’s policy agenda to strengthen and increase the confidence of citizens and ensure that their money is used properly;
Amendment 31 #
2016/2033(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on Member States to better coordinate their policies on reverse charge mechanisms in order to facilitate theestablish a mandatory exchange of information; calls on the Commission to further explore possibilities for extending the application of the VAT reverse charge mechanism to business-to- business supplies of goods, as it already applies to digital products and services;
Amendment 39 #
2016/2033(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Takes the view that the expert advice on which the Commission’s proposals for the programme of action are based contains a number of valuable indicators for a robust, effective, simple and fraud- proof VAT system;
Amendment 78 #
2016/2033(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the authorities responsible to automatically exchange VAT and excise information in particular and to use all available technical means to record cross- border deliveries of goods and services to end- users;
Amendment 9 #
2016/2032(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out key factors enabling SMEs to develop, such as business-friendly environment, modern infrastructure, the existence of technologically advanced sectors of the economy and a highly qualified workforce; believes, therefore, that Capital Markets Union initiatives should be prepared in such a way as to lower the transaction costs of raising capital and to reach the micro-enterprises group, which is both the largest and the one with the weakest links to capital markets;
Amendment 33 #
2016/2032(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission and, on Member States and on regions to provide a clear and stable legal environment, and to guarantee coordination, consistency and synergies between financial instruments and programmes which support SMEs, such as the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI funds), Horizon 2020 and COSME; welcomes the Juncker investment plan, and draws SMEs' attention to the opportunities offered by the European Fund for Strategic Investment (EFSI);
Amendment 41 #
2016/2032(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Believes that regulatory proposals connected to the Capital Markets Union should not lead to excessive regulatory burdens on SMEs or limiting the benefits this sector could reap as a result of creating a single capital market;
Amendment 57 #
2016/2032(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that regional and local banks have an important role to play in financing SMEs because they have better knowledge of the local and regional economies and unique methods of assessing credit risk of local businesses;
Amendment 59 #
2016/2032(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Emphasises that increased competition for the banking sector is a necessary step towards decreasing its domination in providing sources of financing in the EU, particularly for the SME sector; calls therefore for eliminating the barriers that limit this competition on the part of non-banking entities and for financial instruments, new players and innovation from outside the financial sector, as well as for legislative initiatives in this area;
Amendment 65 #
2016/2032(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that, setting aside the issue of their size, each SME is different and there are many factors which determine their needs and the ease with which they can obtain funding, such as where they are based, especially underlining the difficult circumstances in rural and sparsely populated areas, the business sector in which they operate and the stage they have reached in their development; calls on the Commission, Member States and regional authorities to take these factors into account in coming up with tailor-made financing arrangements which in particular exploit the scope for combining subsidies and funding instruments.
Amendment 8 #
2016/2024(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights the importance of the LIFE programme, which aims to promote implementation of both environment and climate objectives and their integration into other policies and Member State practice, and calls therefore for its resources to at least bebe mandatorily maintained at the level of the 2016 appropriations;
Amendment 13 #
2016/2024(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates its firm belief that Erasmus+, as an emblematic mobility programme, must receive increased funding, and calls for the strengthening and expansion of the Creative Europe and Europe for Citizens programmes;
Amendment 18 #
2016/2024(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for Parliament’s delegation to emphasise the importance of full implementation of the budget lines dedicated to the environment, climate change, public health and food safety, despite their size in budgetary terms;
Amendment 38 #
2016/2024(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 25 #
2016/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Encourages national authorities at all levels, regional and local levels included, to raise awareness of rights and obligations under the directive, and encourages the Member States to equip their national equality bodies and, where they exist, bodies at regional and local level with sufficient resources to provide information on remedy proceedings and on the range of consultation services available to assist in national compliance with the directive;
Amendment 38 #
2016/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that providingensuring that there are baby changing facilities in all public toilets would help promote inclusive transport and tourism;
Amendment 49 #
2016/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to assess airlines’ rules for assistance and admittance of pregnant women to flights, and encouragesto take steps to make airline managing bodies to takensure a harmonised approach in this regard;
Amendment 213 #
2016/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to investigate the functioning of cross-border parcel delivery in accordance with the various rules resulting from either international trade agreements (e.g. the rules of the Universal Postal Union (UPU) and the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) or EU law (e.g. the Union Customs Code), especially the universal service obligation, which can be misused and create market distortion; calls on the Commission and the Member States to study and adopt best practice for cross-border delivery and e- commerce;
Amendment 35 #
2016/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that the portability of social security benefits, pensions, health care and recognition of professional qualifications and civil status documents is a guaranteed fundamental right conferred on citizens in the Internal Market; notes that many citizens still encounter problems in asserting these rights due to the negligence of some Member States;
Amendment 42 #
2016/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the rights of people with disabilities, who strive to live a life as close to normal as possible; calls on the Commission and, the Member States and the local and regional authorities to ensure that these rights are properly respected and applied, notably the rights resulting from the ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities;
Amendment 54 #
2016/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Member States and the local and regional authorities to act, in accordance with the Charter, to ensure that citizens receive universal access to quality healthcare, justice, social services and education; underlines that asylum seekers who come into contact with Frontex should have their fundamental rights respected and should be offered full recourse, legal and otherwise, to uphold those rights via an established complaints mechanism;
Amendment 72 #
2016/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States and local and regional authorities to guarantee the fundamental rights of citizens from non-EU countries, particularly asylum seekers, living in an EU country as laid down in the Charter of Fundamental Rights;
Amendment 93 #
2016/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the advances made in LGTBI rights in 2015; remains concerned about ongoing discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and limits to the freedom of speech of LGTBI people;
Amendment 135 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas migration is an unavoidable part of the EU’s present and future and one of the biggest challenges of our times, as it appeals to the EU’s international humanitarian responsibilities and forms a key element for demographic reasons;
Amendment 155 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas acts of terrorism constitute one of the most serious violations of fundamental human rights and freedoms; whereas it is necessary to have adequate tools in place to protect EU citizens and residents and to respond properunequivocally to such violations;
Amendment 194 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas racism, xenophobia and hate crime threaten the core values of the EU and its Member States; whereas there is an increase in hate speech among political forces and increasing xenophobia and other bias in important sectors of the population;
Amendment 215 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas children are the future of our society and we are responsible for their present; whereas education is one of the best ways to impart values such as peace, tolerance, coexistence, equality, justice and respect for human dignity via formal, non- formal and informal education methods;
Amendment 221 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas live-streaming of child sexual abuse is no longer an emerging new trend, but an established reality; whereas children are at risk of harm through online grooming and solicitation for sexual purposes, which in the most serious cases can turn into sexual coercion and other forms of abuse;
Amendment 231 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas the EU institutions have already started procedures to overcome the so-called ‘Copenhagen dilemma’, not only for those countries applying for EU membership but also in Member States where the enforcement of fundamental human rights values should be monitored and observed in all circumstances;
Amendment 239 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
M. whereas the migration crisis has triggered mistrust, intolerance, and rising hatred towards national minority communities in Europe, which also affects the position of traditional national minorities;
Amendment 252 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
O. whereas many persons of Roma origin in Europe face prejudice, intolerance, hostility, discrimination and social exclusion in their daily lives; whereas segregation of Roma children in schooling remains a persistent problem in some Member States;
Amendment 285 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates that human dignity is inviolable and must be respected and protected; calls for awareness-raising amongst EU citizens on the inherent dignity of all persons in order to achieve a more tolerant, sensitive, and inclusive society;
Amendment 375 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Considers that offering the possibility of an education is one of the foundations for the social and cultural integration of refugees; calls on the Commission to draw up a framework and proposals for better integration through education;
Amendment 396 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Reiterates that intercultural and inter-religious tolerance needs to be promoted via constant efforts and extensive dialogue and that the crisis arising from the waves of migration cannot be tackled without the involvement of all relevant state and non-state actors, including churches and, religious organisations, and NGOs;
Amendment 454 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that a European early warning and responsive system should be set up to identify groups that are at high risk of radicalisation; calls on the EU and the Member States to make greater efforts to prevent radicalisation via the Internet and social media, in particular among young people, and to assist the families of those who are at risk, and considers that attention needs to be focused in particular on organised groups and non- governmental organisations which advocate violence and other forms of intolerance; encourages Member States to exchange best practices and to use intelligence-sharing mechanisms in order to fight terrorist networks efficiently;
Amendment 480 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that Commission’s report on the progress made in the fight against trafficking in human beings shows that the Internet and new technologies enable organised crime groups to access a large pool of potential victims on a much larger scale than ever before, as many victims of trafficking, especially for sexual and labour exploitation, are recruited online; calls on EU law enforcement agencies to step up their efforts and cooperate more intensively with one another in targeting criminal trafficking networks and facilitators, paying special attention to crimes against children;
Amendment 493 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on Member States and regional and local authorities to strengthen guardianship systems for children deprived of parental care and unaccompanied children; notes that, while implementing the system, a special focus is needed on accompanying persons and, in light of the best interests of the child, on not separating the child from family or from non-formal accompaniment;
Amendment 512 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Highlights that education is an effective tool in crime prevention and calls on Member States and regional and local authorities to implement prevention education programmes into national curriculums and to promote and mainstream prevention programmes;
Amendment 576 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on Member States and regional and local authorities to develop and disseminate tools and mechanisms for reporting hate crime and hate speech and to ensure that any case of alleged hate crime or hate speech is effectively investigated, prosecuted and tried in accordance with national law and, where relevant, in compliance with the Framework Decision on Racism and Xenophobia, European and international human rights obligations, as well as relevant ECtHR case law;
Amendment 593 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the EU and, the Member States, and regional and local authorities to strengthen the role of human rights education in national curricula as a tool for preventing racism and related intolerance, and calls for greater rights awareness;
Amendment 651 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Urges Member States and regional and local authorities to lead more targeted awareness-raising campaigns, to prevent and protect victims of violence and to protect their rights without delay in line with the Victims’ Rights Directive;
Amendment 665 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Highlights that no cultural, religious, national or ethnic background can justify any form of gender-based violence and that EU and national authorities should strengthen their cooperation and exchange best practice;
Amendment 800 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Points to the important role that regional and local authorities in the EU can play in protecting traditional national minorities;
Amendment 827 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Recalls that persons with intellectual and psychosocial disabilities face particular barriers to the fulfilment of their fundamental rights and calls on Member States and regional and local authorities to strengthen efforts to promote their autonomy and inclusion on an equal basis with others;
Amendment 830 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Notes that children with disabilities disproportionately experience a variety of human rights violations, including the denial of access to basic services such as education and healthcare or placement in institutions away from their families and communities, and are at a higher risk of becoming victims of violence, exploitation and other forms of ill-treatment and abuse; highlights the need for comprehensive policy action by the EU and, the Member States, and regional and local authorities to ensure the thorough implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, in conjunction with the CRPD;
Amendment 837 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Calls on the EU and, the Member States, and regional and local authorities to allocate sufficient and stable financial and human resources to the monitoring frameworks established under Article 33(2) of the CRPD to enable them to carry out their functions, and to guarantee their independence by ensuring that their composition and operation take into account the Paris Principles on the functioning of national human rights institutions;
Amendment 838 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Calls on the EU and, the Member States, and regional and local authorities to allocate sufficient and stable financial and human resources to the monitoring frameworks established under Article 33(2) of the CRPD to enable them to carry out their functions, and to guarantee their independence by ensuring that their composition and operation take into account the Paris Principles on the functioning of national human rights institutions;
Amendment 840 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
Paragraph 37
37. Calls on Member States and regional and local authorities to ensure real participation and freedom of expression for persons with disabilities in public life; notes that such efforts should be supported by providing subtitling, sign language interpretation, documents written in Braille and easy-to-read formats;
Amendment 886 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Notes that people belonging to the Roma minority are entitled to freedom of movement, and calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities not to plan resettlement policies based on ethnic reasons;
Amendment 896 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
Paragraph 41
41. Calls on Member States and regional and local authorities, in the light of the Commission’s Report on the implementation of the EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies 2015, to put in place specific measures to fight ethnic discrimination against Roma in line with the Racial Equality Directive provisions, and to combat anti-Gypsyism in line with the Framework Decision on Racism and Xenophobia;
Amendment 922 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
Paragraph 42
42. Notes the rise in euroscepticism and violent political views, and therefore urges the EU and, its Member States, and regional and local authorities to strengthen participation by citizens in EU matters so that Europeans understand that their voices are being heard in the EU and that policymakers are responsive to public opinion expressed through democratic channels;
Amendment 941 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44
Paragraph 44
44. Notes that civil society organisations, including volunteering and youth work, play a key role in social participation and calls on the EU and, the Member States, and regional and local authorities to support and to promote their work;
Amendment 948 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
Paragraph 45
45. Believes that civic education improves citizens’ understanding of the importance of social and political participation, while human rights education raises awareness of their own rights and teaches them respect for the rights of others; calls on Member States to draw up national plans of action for fundamental rights education and to implement the Council of Europe Charter on Education for Democratic Citizenship and Human Rights Education; calls on regional and local authorities to take an active part in the above activities;
Amendment 2 #
2016/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges the continual and swift technological changes occurring in the information society, the deep transformations these changes have brought about within society as a whole, with particular regard to educational and citizenship aspects, and the challenges and opportunities related to the various ICT tools, new media and other new technologies;
Amendment 53 #
2016/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers it crucial that the EU should strategically launch e-democracy tools able to provide decentralised sources of independent information and innovative models of learning, and to stimulate citizens’ active participation and political engagement through participatory and direct democracy mechanisms able to reinforce and complement, where possible, representative democracy;
Amendment 111 #
2016/0400(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part XI – point 104 – paragraph 3 – point 1
Annex I – part XI – point 104 – paragraph 3 – point 1
Directive 97/70/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 3
The amendments to the international instrument referred to in Article 2(4) may be excluded from the scope of this Directive, pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council*Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 8a, amending this Directive in order to exclude from its scope any amendment to the international instrument referred to in Article 2(4) if, on the basis of an evaluation by the Commission, there is a manifest risk that the international amendment will lower the standard of maritime safety, of prevention of pollution from ships or of protection of shipboard living and working conditions established by Union maritime legislation, or be incompatible with the latter.
Amendment 113 #
2016/0400(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part XI – point 105 – paragraph 3 – point 3
Annex I – part XI – point 105 – paragraph 3 – point 3
Directive 2009/59/EC
Article 15 – paragraph 3
Article 15 – paragraph 3
The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 13a, amending this Directive in order to exclude from its scope any amendments to the international instruments referred to in Article 2 may be excluded from the scope of this Directive pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council*if, on the basis of an evaluation by the Commission, there is a manifest risk that the international amendment will lower the standard of maritime safety, of prevention of pollution from ships or of protection of shipboard living and working conditions established by Union maritime legislation, or be incompatible with the latter.
Amendment 115 #
2016/0400(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part XI – point 106 – paragraph 3 – point 2
Annex I – part XI – point 106 – paragraph 3 – point 2
Directive 2001/96/EC
Article 15 – paragraph 3
Article 15 – paragraph 3
The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 15a, amending this Directive in order to exclude from its scope any amendments to the international instruments referred to in Article 3 may be excluded from the scope of tif, on the basis of an evaluation by the Commission, there is a manifest risk that the international amendment will lower the standard of maritime safety, of prevention of pollution from ships Directive, pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002or of protection of shipboard living and working conditions established by Union maritime legislation, or be incompatible with the latter.
Amendment 121 #
2016/0400(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part XI – point 129 – paragraph 3 – point 4
Annex I – part XI – point 129 – paragraph 3 – point 4
Directive 2009/18/EC
Article 20 – paragraph 3
Article 20 – paragraph 3
3. Amendments to the IMO Code for the Investigation of Marine Casualties and Incidents may be excluded from the scope of tThe Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 18a, amending this Directive in order to exclude from its scope any amendment to the IMO Code for the Investigation of Marine Casualties and Incidents if, on the basis of an evaluation by the Commission, there is a manifest risk that the international amendment will lower the standard of maritime safety, of prevention of pollution from ships Directive pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002.or of protection of shipboard living and working conditions established by Union maritime legislation, or be incompatible with the latter.
Amendment 60 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16 a (new)
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) To reach the consumers and therefore to contribute towards the overall 27% target, the priority dispatch for renewable electricity installations greater than 500kW should be properly set;
Amendment 68 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Member States should be encouraged to pursuensure all appropriate forms of cooperation in relation to the objectives set out in this Directive. Such cooperation can take place at all levels, bilaterally or multilaterally. Apart from the mechanisms with effect on target renewable energy share calculation and target compliance, which are exclusively provided for in this Directive, namely statistical transfers between Member States, joint projects and joint support schemes, cooperation can also take the form of, for example, exchanges of information and best practices, as provided for, in particular, in the e-platform established by Regulation [Governance], and other voluntary coordination between all types of support schemes. The Commission should monitor and evaluate measures taken at national level in order to ensure the collective achievement of the EU 27% energy target. If the Commission concludes that the targets, objectives and contributions of the national plans are insufficient for the collective achievement of the EU overall 27% target, the Commission should require the revision of Integrated National Energy and Climate Plans.
Amendment 74 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 57
Recital 57
(57) Several Member States have implemented measures in the heating and cooling sector to reach their 2020 renewable energy target. However, in the absence of binding national targets post- 2020, the remaining national incentives may not be sufficient to reach the long- term decarbonisation goals for 2030 and 2050. In order to be in line with such goals, reinforce investor certainty and foster the development of a Union-wide renewable heating and cooling market, while respecting the energy efficiency first principle, it is appropriate to encourage the effort of Member States in the supply of renewable heating and cooling to contribute to the progressive increase of the share of renewable energy. Given the fragmented nature of some heating and cooling markets, it is of utmost importance to ensure flexibility in designing such an effort. It is also important to ensure that a potential uptake of renewable heating and cooling does not have detrimental environmental side-effects, in particular as regards air quality.
Amendment 83 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 63 a (new)
Recital 63 a (new)
(63a) Further incentives (e.g. making advanced fuels cost-competitive) to increase the level of advanced biofuels in aviation and transport sectors are necessary to overcome the lack of commercial viability;
Amendment 85 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 63 b (new)
Recital 63 b (new)
(63b) In order to help them to tackle the challenge of the transformation needed in the transport sector, Member States should fully utilise available EU financing possibilities to help aviation sector and shipping industry to cover initial costs in the transition period.
Amendment 109 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)
(ga) 'highly sustainable crop based biofuels' means biofuels that – are produced from cereals, other starch-rich crops, sugars and oil crops, and – save at least 70% GHG emissions compared to fossil fuel according to the methodology in article 28 (1) from 2021, increasing to at least 80% by 2030; and – are produced from feedstocks obtained in accordance with the requirements and standards under the provisions referred to Article 93 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy; or are certified to comply with an equivalent set of sustainability standards.
Amendment 141 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
Every 2 years, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of the list of feedstocks in parts A and B of Annex IX in order to revise the list and add feedstocks, in line with the principles set out in this paragraph. The first evaluation shall be carried out no later than 6 months after [date of entry into force of this Directive]. If appropriate, the Commission shall adopt delegated acts to amend the list of feedstocks in parts A and B of Annex IX in order to add feedstocks, but not to remove them. The Commission shall, if appropriate, present a proposal to modify the Annex IX to address the potential issues of greenhouse gas savings and environmental impacts of the new feedstocks, but without neglecting the need of energy sectors, especially small energy sectors and small energy suppliers, to be able to adapt to the changing market conditions.
Amendment 165 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 23 – paragraph 2
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may designate and make public, on the basis of objective and non-discriminatory criteria, a list of measures and the implementing entities, such as fuel suppliers, which shall contribute to the increase set out in paragraph 1. Member States may exempt small energy suppliers and small energy sectors from this obligation, in order to avoid disproportionate administrative burdens.
Amendment 169 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
With effect from 1 January 2021, Member States shall require fuel suppliers to include a minimum share of energy from advanced biofuels and other biofuels and biogas produced from feedstock listed in Annex IX, fromhighly sustainable crop based biofuels, renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels of non-biological origin, from waste-based fossil fuels and from renewable electricity in the total amount of transport fuels they supply for consumption or use on the market in the course of a calendar year.
Amendment 184 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 – point b – paragraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 – point b – paragraph 1
for the calculation of the numerator, the energy content of advanced biofuels and other biofuels and biogas produced from feedstock listed in Annex IX, renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels of non- biological origin, waste based fossil fuels supplied to all transport sectors, and renewable electricity supplied to road vehicles and trains, shall be taken into account.
Amendment 188 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 – point b – paragraph 2
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 – point b – paragraph 2
For the calculation of the numerator, the contribution from biofuels and biogas produced from feedstock included in part B of Annex IX shall be limited to 1.7% of the energy content of transport fuels supplied for consumption or use on the market and the contribution of fuels supplied in the aviation and maritime sector shall be considered to be respectively 2 times and 1.2 times their energy content.
Amendment 106 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. When preparing the national plans referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall takeavoid administrative burden and additional costs by taking into account the interlinkages between the five dimensions of the Energy Union and they shall use consistent data and assumptions across the five dimensions where relevant.
Amendment 134 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. When setting and reviewing their contribution referred to in paragraph 1 Member States may take into account circumstances affecting primary and final energy consumption, such as:
Amendment 529 #
2016/0288(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 92 a (new)
Article 92 a (new)
Article 92a Intra-Union calls 1. Providers of publicly available number based interpersonal communication services shall not apply tariffs to intra-Union fixed and mobile communications services terminating in another Member State which are higher from tariffs for services terminating in the same Member State, unless it is justified by the difference in mobile termination rates. 2. Where providers of publicly available number based interpersonal communication services apply different tariffs to intra-Union fixed and mobile communications services terminating in another Member State than to services terminating in the same Member State, the surcharge shall not be higher than the difference between mobile termination rate of the Member State where the call is terminating and mobile termination rate of the Member State where call is originating.
Amendment 15 #
2016/0287(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Support of this kind should encourage entities with a public mission such as public authorities and providers of public services to offer free local wireless connectivity as an ancillary service to their public mission so as to ensure that local communities can experience the benefits of very high-speed broadband in the centres of public life. Such entities could include municipalities and other local public authorities, libraries and hospitals, health centres, retirement homes, orphanages, transport services, tourist related services and other entities of particular interest for the local community and its people.
Amendment 27 #
2016/0287(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Support of this kind should encourage entities with a public mission such as public authorities and providers of public services on the local level to offer free local wireless connectivity as an ancillary service to their public mission so as to ensure that local communities can experience the benefits of very high-speed broadband in the centres of public life. Such entities could include municipalities and other local public authorities, local offices of regional authorities, regional local services, libraries and hospitals.
Amendment 31 #
2016/0287(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Given the non-commercial nature of this intervention and the small scale of individual projects foreseen, the administrative burden should be limited to a minimum. This should be done by simplifying planning procedure and relaxing regulatory obligations. Therefore, the intervention should be implemented by the most appropriate forms of financial assistance, notably grants, available under the Financial Regulation, now or in future. The intervention should not rely on financial instruments.
Amendment 36 #
2016/0287(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Due to the limited reach of any single local wireless access point and the small value of individual projects covered, access points benefitting from financial assistance under this Regulation are not expected to challenge commercial offers. In order to further ensure that such financial assistance does not unduly distort competition, crowd out private investments or create disincentives for private operators to invest, the intervention should be limited to projects that do not duplicate already existing private or public offers of similar characteristics in the same area. This should not exclude additional support to deployments under this initiative from public or private sources of funding.
Amendment 37 #
2016/0287(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) To ensure that connectivity in accordance with this Regulation is provided quickly, financial assistance should be implemented usingthrough streamlined administrative procedure using standardised documentation (such as vauchers) and to the fullest extent possible on-line tools that allow for the swift submission and handling of applications and support the implementation, monitoring and auditing of the local wireless access points installed.
Amendment 37 #
2016/0287(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8 a) Implementation of this initiative should take into account possible synergy with other existing EU programs and funds.
Amendment 38 #
2016/0287(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Given Internet connectivity needs within the Union and the urgency of, there is an urgent need to promotinge access networks that can deliver, throughout the EU, an Internet experience of high quality that is able to play an important role in fostering the promotion of the digital literacy, boost the development of new tourism services and contribute to better mobility of the local communities. That high quality Internet experience should be based on very high- speed broadband services, and financial assistance should seek to attain a geographically balanced distribution that favours the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the Union. However, the promotion of such access networks should be achieved without neglecting the specific needs of communities that are smaller and economically lagging behind, such as rural areas, islands, cross-border and mountainous regions, which are referred to in Article 349 TFEU.
Amendment 52 #
2016/0287(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11 a) 11.1 Distribution of interventions should take in consideration socio- economic differences of European regions. It is essential that this initiative particularly focus on the underdeveloped regions, rural areas, mountainous areas, small islands and other peripheral parts of Europe with similar problems with aims to improve condition of life, create better working environment, to diminish risks of unemployment and depopulation.
Amendment 54 #
2016/0287(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 b (new)
Recital 11 b (new)
(11 b) 11.2 Taking into account the benefits of this program for economic and social development for the local communities, initiative should serve to prepare future extension of program or should be integrated as a part of the future post 2020 cohesion policy.
Amendment 64 #
2016/0287(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Financial assistance shall be available to entities with a public mission such as regional and local authorities and providers of public services undertaking to provide free local wireless connectivity through the installation of local wireless access points.
Amendment 67 #
2016/0287(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
2 a) encourages the better integration of local communities in the Digital Single Market and boost the development of innovative digital services and applications - offered by local SMEs and transport and tourism businesses;
Amendment 69 #
2016/0287(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
COM(2016)0589
Article 2, paragraph 6
Article 2, paragraph 6
Projects duplicating already existing private or public offers of similar characteristics, including quality, in the same area shall not be covered.
Amendment 72 #
2016/0287(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation No 283/2014
Annex - Section 4 - subparagraph 5
Annex - Section 4 - subparagraph 5
The available budget shall be allocated in a geographically balanced manner to the EU's economic, social and territorial cohesion by taking particular account of specific needs of smaller and lagging behind local communities for the projects meeting the above conditions and in view of the proposals received and, in principle, on a 'first come, first served' basis.
Amendment 36 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 60
Recital 60
Amendment 63 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 178
Recital 178
Amendment 98 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 125
Article 125
Amendment 125 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 30a
Article 30a
Amendment 133 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 10 - point b a (new)
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 10 - point b a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 37 – paragraph 8
Article 37 – paragraph 8
(ba) paragraph 8 is replaced by the following: “8. Final recipients supported by an ESI Fund financial instrument may also receive assistance from another ESI Funds priority or programme or from another instrument supported by the budget of the Union or from the European Fund for Strategic Investments, in accordance with applicable Union State aid rules. In that case, separate records shall be maintained for each source of assistance and the ESI Funds financial instrument support shall be part of an operation withgive rise to eligible expenditure distinct from the other sources of assistance.”
Amendment 136 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point c
“(c) financial instruments allowing for the combination ofcombining such contribution with EIB financial products under the European Fund for Strategic Investment in accordance with Article 39a.”
Amendment 160 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 39a - title
Article 39a - title
Contribution of ESI Funds to financial instruments allowing for the combination of suchcombining contribution with EIB financial products under the European Fund for Strategic Investments
Amendment 162 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 39a – paragraph 1
Article 39a – paragraph 1
1. Member Statanaging authorities in coordination with Monitoring Committees may use ESI Funds to provide a contribution to financial instruments referred to in point (c) of Article 38(1) to attract additional private sector investment.
Amendment 166 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 39a – paragraph 2
Article 39a – paragraph 2
2. The contribution referred to in paragraph 1 shall not exceed 25 % of the total support provided to final recipients. In the less developed and transition regions referred to in point (b), (c) and (d) of Article 120(3), the financial contribution may exceed 25% where duly justified by the ex-ante assessment or preparatory assessment undertaken by the EIB under paragraph 3 of this Article, but shall not exceed 50%. The total support referred to in this paragraph shall comprise the total amount of new loans and guaranteed loans as well as equity and quasi-equity investments provided to final recipients. The guaranteed loans referred to in this paragraph shall only be taken into account to the extent that ESI Funds resources are committed for guarantee contracts calculated on the basis of a prudent ex ante risk assessment or preparatory assessment undertaken by the EIB under paragraph 3 of this Article covering a multiple amount of new loans.
Amendment 169 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 39a – paragraph 4
Article 39a – paragraph 4
4. Reporting by managing authorities under Article 46 on operations comprising financial instruments under this Article shall be based on the information kept by the EIB for the purposes of its reporting pursuant to Article 16(1) and (2) of the EFSI Regulation, supplemented by the additional information required under Article 46(2). Requirements under this paragraph shall allow for uniform reporting conditions in accordance with Article 46(3) of this Regulation.
Amendment 175 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 39a – paragraph 6
Article 39a – paragraph 6
6. When implementing financial instruments under point (c) of Article 38(1), the bodies referred to in paragraph 2 and 5 of this article shall ensure compliance with applicable law, including rules covering the ESI Funds, State aid, public procurement and relevant standards and applicable legislation on the prevention of money laundering, the fight against terrorism, tax fraud and tax evasion. Those bodies shall not make use of or engage in tax avoidance structures, in particular aggressive tax planning schemes or practices not complying with tax good governance criteria as set out in EU legislation including Commission recommendations and communications or any formal notice by the latter. They shall not be established and, in relation to the implementation of the financial operations shall not maintain business relations with entities incorporated in jurisdictions that do not co-operate with the Union in relation to the application of the internationally agreed tax standards on transparency and exchange of information. Those bodies may, under their responsibility, conclude agreements with financial intermediaries for the implementation of financial operations. They shall transpose requirements referred to in this paragraph in their contracts with the financial intermediaries selected to participate in the execution of financial operations under such agreements.
Amendment 176 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 39a – paragraph 7
Article 39a – paragraph 7
7. The bodies referred to in paragraph 2 and 5 of this Article, when implementing funds of funds, may further entrust part of the implementation to financial intermediaries provided that those bodies ensure under their responsibility that the financial intermediaries satisfy the criteria laid down in Articles 201(4) and 202(1) and (2) of the Financial Regulation. The financial intermediaries shall be selected on the basis of open, transparent, proportionate and non-discriminatory procedures, avoiding conflict of interest.
Amendment 178 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 39a – paragraph 8
Article 39a – paragraph 8
8. Where managing authorities or another entity contribute ESI Funds programme resources to an existing instrument under point (c) of Article 38(1), the fund manager of which (including a financial intermediary) has already been selected by the EIB, international financial institutions in which a Member State is a shareholder, or a publicly-owned bank or financial institution, established as a legal entity carrying out financial activities on a professional basis and fulfilling the conditions set out under Article 38(4)(b)(iii), they shall entrust implementation tasks to this fund manager or financial intermediary through the award of a direct contract.
Amendment 200 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 42 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 42 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
15a. In Article 42, paragraph 3, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: “ In the case of equity-based instruments targeting enterprises referred to in Article 37(4) for which the funding agreement referred to in point (b) of Article 38(7) was signed before 31 December 20178, which by the end of the eligibility period invested at least 55 % of the programme resources committed in the relevant funding agreement, a limited amount of payments for investments in final recipients to be made for a period not exceeding fourive years after the end of eligibility period may be considered as eligible expenditure, when paid into an escrow account specifically set up for that purpose, provided that State aid rules are complied with and that all of the conditions set out below are fulfilled.
Amendment 201 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 15 b (new)
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 15 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 42 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point c
Article 42 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point c
Amendment 203 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 42 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 42 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
“Where management cost and fees as referred to in point (d) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 and in paragraph 2 of this Article are charged by the body implementing the fund of funds or bodies implementing financial instruments pursuant to point (c) of Article 38(1) and points (a), (b) and (bc) of Article 38(4), they shall not exceed the thresholds defined in the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article. Whereas management costs shall comprise direct or indirect cost items reimbursed against evidence of expenditure, management fees shall refer to an agreed price for services rendered established via a competitive market process, where applicable. Management costs and fees shall be based on a performance based calculation methodology.;”
Amendment 234 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 25 – point b
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 25 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 65 – paragraph 11
Article 65 – paragraph 11
11. An operation may receive support from one or more ESI Funds or from one or more programmes and from other Union instruments, provided that the expenditure declared in a payment application for one of the ESI Funds does not receivrelates to support distinct from the support from another Fund or Union instrument, or support from the same Fund under another programme. The amount of expenditure to be entered into a payment application of an ESI Fund may be calculated for each ESI Fund on a pro rata basis in accordance with the document setting out the conditions for support.
Amendment 49 #
2016/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Where Union assistance is provided to the security sector actors, this may also include military actors under exceptional circumstances as provided for in Article 3a, in particular in the context of a wider security sector reform process and/or capacity building in support of security, resilience and development in third countries, in line with the overarching objective of achieving sustainable development and maintaining a stable global security landscape.
Amendment 58 #
2016/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 230/2014
Article 3a – paragraph 2
Article 3a – paragraph 2
2. Assistance may cover in particular the provision of capacity building programmes in support of security and development, including training, mentoring and advice, as well as the provision of equipment, infrastructure improvements and provision of other servicespaying attention to the adopted provisions on dual-use items as defined in Article 2(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 428/20091a, infrastructure improvements and provision of other services. ________________ 1aCouncil Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items (OJ L 134, 29.5.2009, p. 1).
Amendment 80 #
2016/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 230/2014
Article 3a – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
Article 3a – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
(ba) uncontrolled and unregulated dual-use items as defined in Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 428/2009;
Amendment 51 #
2016/0089(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Mechanisms for admission may include resettlement, humanitarian admission or other legal pathways for admission of persons in clear need of international protection, such as humanitarian visa programmes, humanitarian transfer, family reunification programmes, private sponsorship projects, scholarship programmes, access to education, labour mobility schemes, and others.
Amendment 110 #
2016/0031(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
When a Member State intends to enter into negotiations with a third country in order to amend an existing intergovernmental agreement or to conclude a new intergovernmental agreement, the Member State shall inform the Commission in writing of its intention at the earliest possible moment before the envisaged opening of the negotiations once these are in the planning stage.
Amendment 112 #
2016/0031(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 139 #
2016/0031(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. WherOnce a Member State has givesn the Commission notice of negotiations pursuant to Article 3(1), the Commission services may provide it with advice on how to avoid the incompatibility of the intergovernmental agreement or of the amendment to an existing intergovernmental agreement under negotiation with Union law. That Member State may also request the assistance of the Commission in those negotiations.
Amendment 168 #
2016/0031(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
By [3 months following the entry into force of this Decision] at the latest Member States shall notify to the Commission all existing intergovernmental agreements, including annexes and amendments thereto. Where there are indications that it may be necessary to enter into negotiations with a third country in the future, Member States shall inform the Commission thereof.
Amendment 60 #
2016/0030(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The Commission Communication ‘Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy’14 from February 2015, highlights the fact that the Energy Union rests on solidarity and trust, which are necessary features of energy security. This rRegulation should aim to boost cooperation, solidarity, and trust between the Member States and should put in place the measures needed to achieve these aims, thus paving the way for rapidly establishing and implementing the Energy Union. __________________ 14 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank, COM(2015) 80 final.
Amendment 85 #
2016/0030(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) This Regulation should be taken into account both when operational plans are to be adopted for the use of ESI funding and in the financing criteria for EFSI projects.
Amendment 86 #
2016/0030(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) For the purposes of this Regulation, the following criteria should therefore be taken into account when defining the regional groups: supply patterns, existing and planned interconnections and interconnection capacity between Member States, market development and maturity, existing regional cooperation structures, and the number of Member States in a region, which should be limited to ensure that the group remains of a manageable size. A further possibility to take into account when defining the regional groups should be the inclusion of future Member States involved in an enlargement process.
Amendment 91 #
2016/0030(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) In order to make the regional cooperation feasible, Member States should establish a cooperation mechanism within each region. Such a mechanism or mechanisms should be developed sufficiently in time to allow for conducting the risk assessment and drawing up meaningful plans at regional level. Member States are free to agree on a cooperation mechanism best suited for a given region. The Commission should have a standard-setting and facilitating role in the overall process and share best practisces for arranging regional cooperation such as a rotating coordination role within the region for the preparation of the different documents or establishing dedicated bodies. In absence of an agreement on the cooperation mechanism, the Commission may propose a suitable cooperation mechanism for a given region.
Amendment 49 #
2015/2353(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that grants are an effective form of support in many areas of public intervention and private entrepreneurship; recognises the potential of financial instruments as a form of support for ESI Funds; calls for a more simplified use of financial instruments in future;
Amendment 78 #
2015/2352(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Commission to draw up the studies necessary in order to assess the environmental disaster risk to which individual Member States and their coastal regions might be exposed, taking into account the degree of concentration of offshore oil and gas operations in given areas, the operating conditions, climatic factors such as ocean currents and winds, and the environmental standards applied;
Amendment 81 #
2015/2352(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Calls on the Commission to draw up the studies necessary in order to assess the economic risk to which individual Member States and their coastal regions might be exposed, taking into account the economic sectoral orientation of individual regions, the degree of concentration of offshore oil and gas operations in given areas, the operating conditions, climatic factors such as ocean currents and winds, and the environmental standards applied;
Amendment 82 #
2015/2352(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 c (new)
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13c. Maintains that effective application of the ‘polluter pays’ principle to offshore oil and gas operations should extend not only to the costs of preventing and remedying environmental damage – as is currently achieved via the OSD and ELD – but also to compensation for damage caused indirectly to a country/region/local centre, this being a particularly important consideration for areas which are, to a marked degree, tourist centres and for those whose economy is oriented primarily towards the tourism sector;
Amendment 19 #
2015/2350(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas several tragic accidents have occurred in the past in the waterborne passenger transport sector, including those involving the Estonia, the Herald of Free Enterprise and, the Costa Concordia, and the UND Adryatik;
Amendment 23 #
2015/2350(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the EU has adopted a number of macro strategies predicated on the utilisation of waterways, including for example the Danube, Adriatic-Ionian, and Baltic strategies;
Amendment 29 #
2015/2350(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Encourages the Member States, regional and local authorities, and the Commission to give consideration to WPT, and especially to improve the associated infrastructure within the TEN-T and the CEF by strengthening its interconnection with hinterland infrastructure;
Amendment 33 #
2015/2350(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission to publish a summary report on the implementation of EU strategies in the WPT segment;
Amendment 40 #
2015/2350(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that the integration of WPT into urban public transport networks could considerably enhance mobility efficiency, environmental performance, quality of life, affordability and comfort in cities; calls on the Commission to fully support investments in quality hinterland infrastructure which can contribute to decrease local traffic congestion and make sure that local people are not negatively affected;
Amendment 43 #
2015/2350(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that the integration of WPT into urban and regional public transport networks could considerably enhance mobility efficiency, environmental performance, quality of life, affordability and comfort in cities;
Amendment 53 #
2015/2350(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Is convinced that the EU passenger shipsbuilding industry must remain a key competitive player to be encouraged more actively, while reducing its environmental footprint by boosting research activity and innovation within the industry;
Amendment 81 #
2015/2350(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Invites the Commission to propose a clear framework allocating responsibilities and costs, with a view to improving security and safety in maritime and inland transport; urges the Commission, furthermore, to address additional staff training and education of local police and authorities;
Amendment 90 #
2015/2350(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Points out that a number of enclosed seas, for example the Baltic and the Adriatic, are bordered by several Member States and also by countries that do not belong to the EU, and therefore calls on the authorities responsible to provide for an effective safety, security, and, in particular, emergency system;
Amendment 97 #
2015/2350(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses the importance of the WPT sector in developing sustainable tourism and overcoming the seasonality, in particular in remote regions of the Union such as coastal and island regions; considers, furthermore, that SMEs should be a focal point for the promotion of tourism services; calls on the Commission, Member states, local and regional authorities to make fullest possible use of EU funding opportunities for SMEs;
Amendment 98 #
2015/2350(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses the importance of the WPT sector in developing sustainable tourism, in particular in remote regions of the Union such as coastal and island regions; considers, furthermore, that SMEs should be a focal point for the promotion of tourism services; points to the importance of providing support, including subsidies, for local communities in outlying coastal and island regions;
Amendment 106 #
2015/2350(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Maintains that the WPT sector is important even in areas where it is not at present economically viable, such as more thinly populated remote islands;
Amendment 122 #
2015/2350(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Proposes that a European inland navigation agency be established to bring about the ‘single area for waterborne passenger transport’ and to strive to converge the governance and regulatory systems that already exist for the Rhine, the Danube and other inland waterways, along with navigation systems on the EU’s enclosed seas;
Amendment 116 #
2015/2349(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Draws attention to the upheavalseries of new challenges which the development of connected and self-driving vehicles are likely towill cause for small businesses;
Amendment 226 #
2015/2349(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for the establishment of cooperation structures between small transport firms and local and regional authorities with a view to improving the organisation of urban mobility;
Amendment 5 #
2015/2348(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
Citation 7 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission communication of 16 February 2016 on an EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage (COM(2016)049)
Amendment 41 #
2015/2348(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. IHighlights that the local acceptance and implementation of cross- border infrastructures projects has become increasingly vulnerable since 2015 ; is concerned about the negative impact on the logistics sector of closures of internal borders in connection with the ‘'refugee crisis’'; calls on the Member States and the Commission to take into account freight flows into accountand the implementation of cross-border infrastructure projects when adopting such measures;
Amendment 57 #
2015/2348(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – indent 4
Paragraph 4 – indent 4
- aimed at accelerating uptake of new technologies, particularly LNG that will strengthen the sector’s performance;
Amendment 91 #
2015/2348(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Regrets that too often Member States’ national infrastructure plans are decided without reference to the TEN-T objectives; urges the Commission to increase coordination between the two levels of planning and suggests adding to the European Semester a chapter on supervising its coherence with appropriate corrective measures; calls on the Commission not to prioritiseto avoid Member State projects that are not in line with the TEN-T programming; notes that a lack of harmonization, political will and cooperation between neighbouring member states may hamper cross-border projects; calls on the Commission to strictly monitor the implementation of cross-border transport projects, in particular those of common European interest ;
Amendment 153 #
2015/2348(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Highlights that EU funding targets large projects while too little attention is paid to cross-border infrastructure and facilities, particularly railway cross- border regional links; notes the projects on the comprehensive network that have significant importance for the EU are often not eligible for (co-)funding; in this regard it is important to assess the need to bridge missing links and to identify alternative possibilities for financing those projects in future; therefore highlights that cross-border infrastructure should not be neglected by the Commission and it should be as high on the European agenda as TEN-T;
Amendment 164 #
2015/2348(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the Commission’s first steps to introduce fuel standards for heavy commercial vehicles (HCVs) and CO2 limits; emphasizes the potential of LNG in freight transport that could contribute to the reduction of global emissions; is of the opinion that increased size of HCVs would entail a deep revision of the infrastructure and operational standards of the TEN-T network and that alternatives such as reducing ‘'empty returns’' could achieve greater efficiency gains with less impact on the infrastructure;
Amendment 172 #
2015/2348(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Considers that further measures are needed to make road transport more efficient and environmentally friendly in the logistics chain; calls for the possibility to be introduced in the core network corridors of allowing loaded HCVs running on clean alternative fuels compliant with the highest emissions, noise, safety and social standards to circulate without restrictions 365 days a year; calls on the Commission to support incentives aimed at wider use of LNG in freight transport, especially in maritime sector; insists that the core-network corridors be provided at least with alternative filling stations, LNG refuelling points and safe truck parking areas;
Amendment 180 #
2015/2348(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses the importance of improving the provision of and access to information on EU multimodal and logistics services, in particular to SMEs, transport businesses and start-ups that have limited access to this information; calls on the Commission, in cooperation with network operators, to present a handbook on multimodal transport in the EU that includes current agreements, tools, conventions, legislation and best practices;
Amendment 5 #
2015/2347(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Urges the Member States in Central and Eastern Europe to ensure coordination and synergy between the existing European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds, the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF), Horizon 2020, the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) and EIB and EBRD resources when implementing projects aimed at improving the connection and accessibility of the transport infrastructure in the region; underlines that the use of all this readily available funding should be given priority, especially in the context of the current absorption rate, over investment participation by third parties in cases where this investment is driven by political considerations rather than business interests;
Amendment 14 #
2015/2347(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas intensifying work on projects such as the Via Carpatia and, Rail Baltica and the Adriatic-Ionian Corridor would provide an important stimulus for improving the connectivity and accessibility of the transport infrastructure in this part of the EU;
Amendment 39 #
2015/2347(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Strongly advises making better use of existing policies and instruments for regional cooperation, such as European Territorial Cooperation (ETC), Interreg and especially European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation (EGTCs), to enhance cross-border transport between regions and remove bottlenecks; urges the Member States to support and not impede such solutions on a local and regional level; advocates the use of existing macro- regional strategies like those for the Danube and the, Baltic Sea and Alpine regions in order to advance transnational infrastructure projects and preparations for potential new macro-regional strategies in Central and Eastern Europe;
Amendment 78 #
2015/2347(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Asks the Commission to further explore the integration of the Western Balkans accession countries into the TEN- T network and the cooperation on transport links with Ukraine and other neighbouring countries; welcomes the extension of TEN-T network on Western Balkans countries; calls on Western Balkan countries to continue working on six infrastructure projects and to swiftly implement "soft measures" (e.g. simplifying/aligning border crossing procedures, railway reforms, information systems) agreed during the 2015 WB Summit in Vienna; calls on the Commission to inform the European Parliament about the conclusion that will be taken during the WB 2016 Summit in France;
Amendment 82 #
2015/2347(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Asks the Commission to further explore and propose the integration of the Western Balkans accession countries into the TEN- T network and the cooperation on transport links with Ukraine and other neighbouring countries;
Amendment 120 #
2015/2347(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on the Commission to complete the construction of the Adriatic- Ionian motorway in cooperation with the Member States of Slovenia, Croatia and Greece, and the western Balkan countries of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Albania;
Amendment 133 #
2015/2347(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Notes a lack of road-rail connections to and from the ports; highlights that the most of the airports in Eastern Europe are located in the proximity of rail infrastructure and that integration is still technically possible; calls on the Commission to fully support further integration of multimodal transport connections (road-railway- airport) in Central and Eastern Europe;
Amendment 169 #
2015/2347(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Underscores the role of the Danube River as the key transport waterway in the Danube macro-region; notes that navigability of the Danube River is regulated by the obsolete Danube Convention (1946) which limits the optimal use of fleet and navigation rights; invites the riparian states to ensure the continuous navigability of the river and to implement their master plan for fairway rehabilitation and maintenance endorsed in 2014;
Amendment 177 #
2015/2347(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Underlines the potential for further developing attractive shipping to ports in the Baltic and Black, Black and Adriatic Seas in the context of the ‘Motorways of the Sea’ concept; highlights the importance of expanding capacities in the energy sector and of ensuring efficient railway connections to port hinterlands;
Amendment 186 #
2015/2347(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Highlights that the northern Adriatic ports must strengthen their cooperation, through regional coordination for a common promotion of traffic flows for the maritime trade in the North Adriatic and to fully integrate the Italian ports with those of Slovenia (Koper) and Croatia (Rijeka); in this regard calls on the Commission to include the port of Rijeka in the Baltic-Adriatic corridor to enable full transport connection of northern sea ports towards the Central Europe and Baltic Sea;
Amendment 2 #
2015/2345(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas NGOs are a huge asset to the European Union and play a vitalmajor role in the lives of EU citizens, by safeguarding their right to health and to a healthy environment and by defending their rights as consumers, and whereas they boost research, innovation and development cooperation;
Amendment 4 #
2015/2345(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that NGOs are an important EU partner playing a valuable role in EU policy and programme delivery across policy areas, including – but not limited to – humanitarian and social aid inside and outside of the European Union, development cooperation, education and culture, neighbourhood policy, and the environment;
Amendment 8 #
2015/2345(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Takes the view that the Commission should foster the independence of NGOs and public involvement in their funding, with a view to dynamising the relationship between citizens and NGOs; points out that NGOs’ primary task is to promote and defend the interests of civil society, which consists of citizens at all levels of governance;
Amendment 36 #
2015/2345(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to reduce NGOs’ administrative burdens by simplifying application, implementation and reporting, ensuring there is a mix of funding for different actors and streamlining financial requirements such as audits;
Amendment 38 #
2015/2345(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Takes the view that a public register of EU-funded NGOs should be set up and that it should also give details of the amount and purpose of the subsidies paid out and the ways in which they are spent;
Amendment 41 #
2015/2345(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5 Recalls that NGOs differ in terms of size and, activities and territorial scope; urges that a range of grants be offered; asks the Commission to make administrative burdens proportional to grant size;
Amendment 43 #
2015/2345(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission, with a view to optimisplacing its cooperation with civil society on a credible footing, to carry out regular assessments of the way in which funds allocated to NGOs are administered;
Amendment 48 #
2015/2345(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Given the unpredictable environment in which NGOs now operate, stresses that NGOs should be permitted to adjust projects during implementation based on real-time re- evaluation;
Amendment 54 #
2015/2345(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recognises that working with multiple donors increases administrative burdens; asks the Commission, therefore, to limit and equalise minimum percentage requirements in co-funding agreements, ensure that in- kind contributions are considered eligible, harmonise external evaluation requirements and make better use of existing evaluations;
Amendment 60 #
2015/2345(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Takes the view that subsidies should be proportional to the other resources available to NGOs from other sources, so as to ensure that EU funds are allocated fairly and more appropriately;
Amendment 66 #
2015/2345(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to promotestrengthen proactive engagement with NGOs in order to focus on priorities such as simplification and better implementation.
Amendment 7 #
2015/2344(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that the success of the eurozone is dependent on increasing the welfare of all its citizens, and on well- functioning labour markets and welfare systems, based on decent work with rights, a strong role for the social partners, social dialogue, collective bargaining and collective agreements, and preventing and deterring individual Member States from trying to gain an unfair competitive advantage by infringing workers’ rights or promoting social dumping;
Amendment 7 #
2015/2344(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that the crisis enhanced the need for improvement in coordinated EU economic governance and that the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) must be progressively, but fully, completed;
Amendment 35 #
2015/2344(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that in order to stabilise the social situation in Member States, economic stabilisers such as a European Unemployment Insurance (EUI) scheme should strengthen the welfare state and fight social deprivation and poverty caused by one- sided fiscal discipline measures taken under the European economic governance framework;
Amendment 409 #
2015/2344(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls for the ESM, whilst fulfilling its ongoing tasks, to be further developed and turned into a European Monetary Fund (EMF) with adequate lending and borrowing capacities and a clearly defined mandate, including its contribution to a euro area fiscal capacity; stresses that an EMF should be managed by the Commission and held democratically accountable by the European Parliament; emphasises that national parliaments would be involved in the process, given that their constitutional prerogatives regarding financial resources could be affected; calls for the possibility of also including the candidate countries in the ESM;
Amendment 16 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the European Union is resolved to frame a common defence policy leading to a common defence which reinforces its European identity and, autonomy and unity in order to promote peace, security and progress in Europe, its neighbourhood and in the world;
Amendment 23 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas the cost of non-Europe in security and defence is estimated to be more than EUR 100 billion per year and the EU's level of efficiency equivalent to 10% to 15% of the American one;
Amendment 43 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the development of the CSDP requires shared values and principles, common interests and priorities, and political will from the Member States, as well as the setting-up of robust institutional cooperation structures; whereas the CSDP should be a common structured policy and not a mere sum of the national policies of the Member States;
Amendment 118 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
M. whereas active role of the European Parliament in framing a common Union defence policy and establishing common defence, without the European Parliament’s political and institutional support would undermin, political control and consultation, as noted in Article 14 TEU, would affirm and enhance the representative and democratic foundations of the Union;
Amendment 147 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the reform and innovation that the Lisbon Treaty brings to the CSDP constitute a sufficient and coherent framework and should set the path for a truly common policy, based on shared resources and capabilities as well as on coordinated planning at Union level; stresses that the progress of the CSDP within the current institutional and legal framework is dependent more on the political will of Member States than on legal considerations; highlights that Article 43 TEU covers the whole spectrum of crisis management tasks the use of which in rapid and decisive way is the EU's level of ambition;
Amendment 155 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls, therefore, on the VP/HR, the Council and the Member States to use all the possibilities provided for in the Treaty, especially the mechanisms contained in Article 42(6) TEU and, Article 46 TEU and in Protocol 10 on Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO), and in Article 44 TEU on the implementation of a CSDP task by a group of Member States, in order to achieve a faster, more efficient and more flexible deployment of missions and operations;
Amendment 157 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. calls for the formation of the European Intelligence Agency with the mission and capability to implement a de facto transversal intelligence network within the Member States allowing the European Union to react in a comprehensive and coordinated way to emerging threats by adhering to Article 24(3)TEU and Article 4(3)TEU, as the comprehensive gathering of intelligence information cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, either at central level or at regional and local level, but can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Union level (Article 5(3)TEU);
Amendment 207 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Urges the Council to act in accordance with Article 41(3) TEU and without delay adopt a decision establishing the start-up fund for the urgent financing of the initial phases of military operations for the tasks referred to in Article 42(1) and Article 43 TEU;
Amendment 208 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10 b. In accordance with Article 42(2)TEU urges Council to take concrete steps towards the harmonisation and standardisation of the European armed forces, in order to facilitate the cooperation of armed forces personnel under the umbrella of a new European Defence Union as a step in the progressive framing of a common Union defence policy;
Amendment 209 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 c (new)
Paragraph 10 c (new)
10 c. In accordance to with Article 43(2) TEU calls on the Council to ensure coordination of the civilian and military aspects of tasks referred to in Article 43(1) TEU and civilian and military capabilities listed in Council conclusions on implementing the EUGS in the area of Security and Defence from 14 November 2016 by setting-up an EU Operational Headquarters as a precondition for effective planning, command and control of common operations;
Amendment 231 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Emphasises that security and defence constitute an area where European added value can be easily demonstrated, in terms of economic and efficiency gains, by giving Member States increased and more cost-effective capacity, through greater coherence, coordination and interoperability in security and defence, as well as in terms of contributing to consolidating solidarity and cohesion within the Union, and resilience of the Union; highlights estimation that each euro invested in defence generates a return of 1.6, in particular through skilled employment, research and technology, and exports;
Amendment 232 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Stresses that the use of all possibilities provided for in the Treaty would improve competitiveness and functioning of the defence industry in the single market, further stimulate defence cooperation through positive incentives, and targeting projects that Member States are not able to undertake, reducing unnecessary duplication, and promoting a more efficient use of public money;
Amendment 256 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the projected increase in national defence expenditure to 2 % of EU GDP; highlights that this would mean extra expenditure of nearly EUR 100 billion on defence by the end of the coming decade; considers that this boost should be used to launch more strategic cooperative programmes within and through the Union, by better structuring the demand and supply sides and making both sides more efficient and more effective; is of opinion that the outputs of these strategic cooperative programmes have great potential to be dual-use technologies and as such bring extra added value to Member States;
Amendment 263 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Is convinced that the Union’s investment in defence should ensure that all Member States can participate in a balanced, coherent and synchronised improvement of their military capabilities; emphasises practical and financial benefits of further integrations of European defence capabilities to an integrated defence market and developing an open, competitive, innovative and inclusive European Defence Technological and Industrial Base; cautions that most of the costs of non- Europe in security and defence lay in the duplication or multiplication of operational structures, stocks and research activities and programmes; considers that this constitutes a strategic opportunity for the Union to improve its security and defence;
Amendment 313 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Regrets that Member States have not yet developed a common European armaments and capabilities policy (EACP) within the EDA as foreseen by Article 42(3) TEU and calls on the Commission to put forward proposals on this matter; calls on the VP/HR to inform Parliament of the results achieved by the existing working relationship between the EDA and the Commission and of both with the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Organisation for Joint Armament Cooperation (OCCAR);
Amendment 333 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Encourages the Member States to establish and join PESCO within the Union framework, with a view to sustaining and improving their military capabilities through doctrine and leadership development, personnel development and training, defence material and infrastructure development, and interoperability and certification; encourages the Member States participating in PESCO to set up a permanent 'European Integrated Force' composed of divisions of their national armies and to make it available to the Union for the implementation of the common security and defence policy as foreseen by Article 42(3) TEU; calls on HR/VP to come up with options for the operationalization of PESCO in first half of 2017;
Amendment 356 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Takes the view that the EU Battlegroup system should be brought under PESCO, alongside the creation of a European-level headquarters; considers that other European multinational structures such as the European Air Transport Command, Eurocorps and OCCAR, as well as all bilateral and multilateral forms of military cooperation among PESCO participating countries, should also be brought under PESCO; considers that the EU’s privileges and immunities should apply to those multinational structures being part of PESCO;
Amendment 372 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Stresses that the European Parliament should play a prominent role in the supervision of implementation and in the evaluation of the CSDP; insists that Parliament must be consulted on major decisions in the area of the CSDP, including regarding military missions and strategic defence operations, as it is noted in Article 14(1) TEU;
Amendment 385 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31 a. Urges the Parliament to turn its Subcommittee on Security and Defence into a fully-fledged parliamentary committee, enabling it to have a prominent role in the implementation of the common security and defence policy and particularly a role in the scrutiny of legal acts related to the security and defence;
Amendment 428 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 a (new)
Paragraph 36 a (new)
36 a. Urges the establishment of precise and binding guidelines to provide a well- defined framework for future activation and implementation of Article 42(7) TEU;
Amendment 444 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)
Paragraph 38 a (new)
38 a. Calls for the immediate reform of the Athena mechanism in view of ensuring a fair sharing of the costs related to operations;
Amendment 5 #
2015/2329(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the fact that in the first two years of the new funding cycle the Europe for Citizens programme seems to be running wellbetter than before;
Amendment 11 #
2015/2329(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the simplification of the programme structure, for example through multiannual priority-setting which, overall, has made it simpler for interested citizens and organisations to apply, as well as a number of new financial arrangements, such as a system of lump-sum payments, that have reduced the unnecessary administrative burden on beneficiaries;
Amendment 22 #
2015/2329(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Encourages National Contact Points (NCPs), together with local and regional authorities associated with them, and the EACEA to seek, wherever possible, synergies across EU programmes such as Creative Europe, Erasmus+ and the European Social Fund, so as to generate economies of scale and maximise impact;
Amendment 35 #
2015/2329(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission, the EACEA, NCPs and their local and regional partner authorities, and programme beneficiaries to make additional efforts to enhance visibility and communication.
Amendment 6 #
2015/2324(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the importance of the Alpine region as a place for people to live, work and relax in, thanks to the vital contributions made by agriculture and forestry, tourism and craft trades; stresses that these sectors are of crucial value in the sustainable development of the region, as they secure a high-quality food supply, maintain the population in outlying areas, maintain the cultural landscape, and preserve ecosystems by means of sustainable biodiversity, soil and water protection; welcomes the EU Alpine Strategy as a way to improve economic, environmental and social development in the Alpine region;
Amendment 12 #
2015/2324(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses the need for initiatives to improve mobility, digital infrastructure, energy supply and social migration; considers it necessary for specific traditions in the fields of land use, craft trades and tourism to be preserved when implementing the strategy;
Amendment 39 #
2015/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas earlier EU macro- regional strategies have proved the success of a cooperation arrangement of this type and provided useful experience for drawing up new macro-regional strategies;
Amendment 48 #
2015/2324(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for the introduction of a specific quality label for mountain products, initiatives to develop new high-quality products and better safeguards, in particular by specifying a protected designation of origin for products from the Alpine region;
Amendment 52 #
2015/2324(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Considers it particularly important to give young farmers long-term prospects in order to address rural depopulation; calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote transnational initiatives to support entrepreneurship, emerging industries and the labour market in agriculture and forestry;
Amendment 53 #
2015/2324(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Highlights the importance of agritourism as a source of income for small-scale farmers (e. g. farm holidays); calls on the Commission and the Member States to establish programmes to support investment and entrepreneurship; considers it important to support those farms through specific tourism campaigns;
Amendment 57 #
2015/2324(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers it necessary to tap renewable and alternativ, decentralised and alternative energy sources in order effectively to reduce emissions of pollutants and to contribute to the preservation of the natural environment; stresses the importance of grid integration and storage as well as the expansion of the necessary infrastructure for mobility based on renewable and alternative fuels to ensure the success of these energy sources;
Amendment 59 #
2015/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Member States’ and regions’ competent authorities to adapt their adopted operational programmes in order to ensure that future projects under the EUSALP strategy are promptly implemented and that managing authorities take due account of EUSALP priorities when implementing the operational programmes (e.g. by way of dedicated calls, bonus points or budget earmarking) and of the importance of integrated macro-regional projects and measures;
Amendment 61 #
2015/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission, the European Investment Bank (EIB), and the participating countries to exploit the possibilities offered by the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) with a view to bringing about sustainable development, economic growth, and employment at macro-regional level;
Amendment 63 #
2015/2324(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Points up the important role of agriculture and rural resources in providing social and educational care for particularly vulnerable people; calls on the Commission to promote social agricultural activities, since, for mountain farmers in particular, they represent a new way of providing alternative services;
Amendment 69 #
2015/2324(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls for the prospective and current regulatory framework for farms throughout the Alpine region, in particular under the CAP, to be harmonised and simplified respectively; points up the need for specific additional support based on factors such as soil assessment and gradients in order to make it possible to farm sustainably on steep hillsides;
Amendment 74 #
2015/2324(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Considers it important that the EU Alpine strategy should be carried out with existing financial resources, such as the 2014-2020 Structural and Investment Funds, and that no new funding should be introduced; stresses that they must be used efficiently in order to carry out the strategy with greater coordination;
Amendment 76 #
2015/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Insists that local and regional authorities, in partnership with the civil sector, should have a leading role in the political managing bodies and in the operational, technical and implementing bodies of the Strategy, in full respect of the principles of subsidiarity and multi-level governance;
Amendment 76 #
2015/2324(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 c (new)
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Welcomes the establishment of a macroregional governance model for the Alpine region so as to foster cross-border cooperation in agriculture and forestry; regards it as important in this connection that there should be improved exchanges of information and experience, on a transnational basis, between associations and producer organisations in the areas of livestock and crop farming and forestry by setting up regular symposia;
Amendment 77 #
2015/2324(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 d (new)
Paragraph 8 d (new)
8d. Emphasises that the development of new initiatives requires regional solutions and participatory approaches, with harmonisation of existing and new initiatives, in order to maximise benefit for mountain farming in the Alps and reduce administrative barriers; points out that the Alpine Convention, EU cohesion policy and existing EU initiatives must be taken into account;
Amendment 82 #
2015/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls for best practice to be exchanged, for the experience acquired in the implementation of EU macro-regional strategies to be turned to account, and for cooperation to be intensified with participants from other macro-regional strategies, for example the Baltic, Danube, and Adriatic-Ionian strategies;
Amendment 103 #
2015/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Emphasises that a macro-regional strategy for the Alps should secure the preservation of forms of traditional economic activity as well as fostering innovation and the development of new initiatives in this field; points to the need for small and medium-sized enterprises to be given easier access to support and financing, bearing in mind their role in creating jobs and preventing rural depopulation;
Amendment 112 #
2015/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Underlines that cooperation between regions is essential for the further development of tourism in the wider region; encourages the formulation of tourism strategies based on existing natural and cultural heritage, sustainability, and innovation;
Amendment 119 #
2015/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Supports the diversification of tourism supply by such means as tourist theme parks and routes, cultural tourism, food and wine tourism, farm tourism, scattered hotels, and sporting tourism, in order to prolong the tourist season, enhance the competitiveness of tourist destinations, and promote new tourist activities that are better adapted to climate change;
Amendment 150 #
2015/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Draws attention to the lack of effective connections within mountain areas; urges the Commission and the Member States to facilitate better connection at regional and local level in order to enhance cohesion and quality of life in these areas and encourage resettlement;
Amendment 164 #
2015/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses the lack of effective digital connections within mountain areas; urges the Commission and the Member States to facilitate better connections at regional and local level in order to enhance the quality of life and promote the development of new activities and the creation of job opportunities in these areas, and to encourage resettlement;
Amendment 15 #
2015/2283(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the continued consideration of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, which are guiding principles for the European Union when it chooses to act; stresses that subsidiarity and democratic legitimacy are closely intertwined concepts; highlights that subsidiarity checks can be considered an important tool for reducing the so-called ‘democratic deficit’; points out that national parliaments have a vital role to play in ensuring that decisions are taken as closely as possible to the citizen; points out that the exercise of EU competence is based on the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality; points out that the general significance and purpose of the subsidiarity principle lie in the fact that it confers a degree of independence on a lower body in relation to a higher body; points to the importance of applying the subsidiarity principle within national frameworks, that is to say, when assigning responsibilities to tiers of power, which usually implies a shift towards local bodies in relation to central government;
Amendment 29 #
2015/2283(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to take into account to a greater extent the efforts the Member States and regional and local communities have already made as regards environmental policies, to ensure it proposes suitable tools and proportionate objectives;
Amendment 36 #
2015/2283(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Is concerned by the fact that some national parliaments have highlighted that, in a number of the Commission’s legislative proposals, the justification of subsidiarity and proportionality is insufficient or non-existent in substance; stresses, in this connection, the need for the European institutions to make it possible for national parliaments to scrutinise legislative proposals by ensuring that the Commission provides detailed and comprehensivewell-argued and factually substantiated grounds for its legislative decisions on subsidiarity and proportionality, in accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 2 to the TFEU;
Amendment 36 #
2015/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the European Entrepreneurial Region (EER) award exists since 2009, launched by the Committee of the Regions to encourage the implementation of the Small Business Act for Europe (SBA) at regional and local level;
Amendment 52 #
2015/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Supports therefore the European Entrepreneurial Region (EER) Award, aimed at identifying and rewarding EU regions with outstanding, future-oriented entrepreneurial strategies applying ten principles of ‘Small Business Act for Europe’;
Amendment 73 #
2015/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Is concerned about the low absorption of funds devoted to SMEs in certain Member States in the 2007-2013 programming period, and warns that the underlying reasons need to be addressed in order to avoid any recurrence of the same problems in the 2014-2020 programming period, such as the administrative procedures making it cumbersome for SMEs to apply for the available funds, should be addressed in order to avoid any recurrence of the same problems in the 2014-2020 programming period; regrets the too general and incomplete nature of the existing studies at European level and in the Member States on the efficiency and real impact of Structural Funds on SMEs and particularly on small and micro enterprises in terms of gains in competitiveness, innovation and job creation;
Amendment 78 #
2015/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the fact that the Commission is paying increased attention to good governance and high-quality public services; recalls the importance for SMEs to have a transparent, consistent and innovative public procurement set-up; calls on contracting authorities that wish to group contracts to take care not to exclude SMEs from the process by the sheer scale of the final lot, since larger contracts could carry more cumbersome criteria; urges therefore that obstacles faced by SMEs in bidding for contracts be removed as far as possible; stresses the need to continue with the strict application of anti-error and anti-fraud measures without adding to the administrative burden;
Amendment 85 #
2015/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates its calls to enhance transparency and the participation of all relevant regional and local authorities, civil society stakeholders and interested parties; reiterates, therefore, the need for implementation of the partnership principle as detailed in the Common Provisions Regulation and the Code of Conduct on Partnership; deplores that while RLA were consulted in most cases, their involvement did not amount to full partnership as outlined in the European Code of Conduct on Partnership; Regrets that RLA have rarely been sufficiently involved in drafting the PAs and OPs as the role they are often given is more that of a stakeholder rather than that of a partner;
Amendment 91 #
2015/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates its calls to enhance transparency and the participation of all relevant regional and local authorities, civil society stakeholders and interested parties; is concerned that still many SMEs organizations in the Member States are not really involved and often only informed without being adequately consulted; reiterates, therefore, the need for implementation of the partnership principle as detailed in the Common Provisions Regulation and the Code of Conduct on Partnership;
Amendment 113 #
2015/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission to identify and reduce, at the earliest possible stage, obstacles preventing the efficient use of funds for SMEs, and to provide specific recommendations for action and guidance; emphasises Parliament’s role in the supervision of results-oriented implementation;
Amendment 126 #
2015/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Asks the High Level Group on Simplification to draw attention to the need for SMEs toeliver concrete proposals on how to simplify procedures in the management of ESI Funds for SMEs; underlines that simplification should be directed towards reduceing the administrative burden and simplify procedures in the management of ESI Fundson beneficiaries, more flexibility of the management and control systems, stronger focus on risk assessment and correct allocation of responsibilities of all authorities, while continuing thinking the right balance between accountability and simplification;
Amendment 132 #
2015/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Asks the High Level Group on Simplification to draw attention to the need for SMEpropose practical measures to reduce the administrative burdenand financial burden SMEs project managers have to face and simplify procedures in the management of ESI Funds; requests that such simplification measures respect Small Business Act rules of ´´Only once´´ and ´´Think small first´´, and be conceived and implemented at different levels in total cooperation with representatives of different categories of SMEs in order to meet their specific needs;
Amendment 138 #
2015/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to urgently find a lasting solution to the backlog of payments related to regional policy, including in the application of and to properly apply the Late Payment Directive, so as to ensure that SMEs, as project partners, will not be deterred from taking part in support programmes and projects during the current programming period on account of payment delays;
Amendment 144 #
2015/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Reiterates that digital is profoundly changing the whole world, also in terms of SMEs opportunities and new challenges that derive; reiterates therefore the importance of supporting initiatives to make digital part of the education and training or re-training systems for youth, jobseekers and workers; calls to support strengthening the innovative uses of ICT by SMEs, in particular the digital literacy, e-learning, e-inclusion, e-skills and related entrepreneurial skills;
Amendment 147 #
2015/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Asks the Managing Authorities to take into consideration the characteristics, with an emphasis on underdevelopment, depopulation and high unemployment rates, and specific competences of individual territories, with a view to promoting both traditional and innovative economic sectors; calls on the Commission to draw up specific programmes which embody all relevant green growth elements for SMEs; stresses the need for youth entrepreneurship potential to be used to the full in the context of green growth, as a way to reconcile economic growth with environmental sustainability;
Amendment 153 #
2015/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls on the managing authorities, where there is a need, to step up the inclusion of the available funds for technical assistance;
Amendment 155 #
2015/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Recalls that often small and micro enterprises, which do not have the internal human, financial and organizational resources to be directly involved in ESIF, can only have such an access via their local organizations and associations; calls therefore to better support their collective actions and activities of coaching/ mentoring; notes also that the technical assistance of Thematic objective 11 must benefit to all the partners referred to in Article 5 of the CPR on partnership and that it is still usually reserved to administrative services; calls therefore to ensure the access of the territorial SME organizations to the provisions of TO 11 and to capacity building measures;
Amendment 168 #
2015/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Calls on the Commission, when preparing cohesion policy for the post- 2020 period, to increase funding for the strengthening of the competitiveness of SMEs;
Amendment 31 #
2015/2279(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas mountain areas by agriculture, tourism and craft make a positive contribution to sustainable development, to maintenance of cultural landscapes and the preservation of regional ecosystems;
Amendment 33 #
2015/2279(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas mountainous cross-border cooperation, tourism and craft represent a sustainable way to foster economic and social development of mountainous regions;
Amendment 55 #
2015/2279(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) should form an integral part of the smart specialisation strategies of regions with mountain areas; notes that administrative burden poses a crucial obstacle to the mainly small communities in mountainous regions and thereby threatens the successful implementation of the programmes; calls therefore on the Commission, Member States and the regions to strengthen synergies between different funds and measures for mountain areas in preparing, examining and adopting operational programmes and to promote the reduction of bureaucracy regarding the application and administration of the use of funds in order to give small communities better access to funding;
Amendment 63 #
2015/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines the potential and importance of existing and future development of macro-regional strategies for the sustainable development of the EU’s mountainous regions with a strong cross- border cooperation dimension, where applicable; calls for experience in the implementation of other EU macro- regional strategies to be taken into account;
Amendment 63 #
2015/2279(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop strategies between local and regional authorities, civil society and economic players in mountain ranges in order to determine joint action plans for the promotion, development and protection of the mountain ranges in question; welcomes and supports in this regard the Alpine macro-regional strategy initiative, and calls on the Commission to take into account the lessons learnt from the implementation of other EU macro- regional strategies;
Amendment 69 #
2015/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls for the experience of European groupings of territorial cooperation (EGTCs), especially those situated in mountainous regions, to be put to use with a view to promoting cross-border cooperation in mountainous regions;
Amendment 75 #
2015/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls for cooperation with European non-Member States, and with regional and local government, for the implementation of a policy for mountainous regions;
Amendment 100 #
2015/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Supports the use of ESI Funds for industry sectors that do not pollute, such as sustainable tourism, cultural heritage, sustainable forestry, high-speed Internet development, crafts, and the renewables sector;
Amendment 104 #
2015/2279(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Believes that sustainable and inclusive tourism can tackle the problem of desertification and the lack of generational renewal and perspective creating jobs and diversified contents for those regions; recalls the importance of investing in infrastructure, in particular in digital infrastructure, and diversified educational offers which boost competitiveness and connectivity;
Amendment 114 #
2015/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Supports IT-based innovative solutions for access to basic education in remote mountainous areas, such as through cooperation among mountainous regions and cities;
Amendment 127 #
2015/2279(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the importance of establishing producer groups or organisations to strengthen the bargaining power of farmers in the food chain; recalls the crucial pertinence of local and regional cultural values while structuring the agricultural production and the promotion and protection of products in mountainous regions;
Amendment 131 #
2015/2279(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Points to the importance of developing new innovative tourism models and promoting successful existing models (scattered hotels, for example), as these benefit the social dimension of mountainous regions;
Amendment 133 #
2015/2279(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that such approaches help maintain and create local and regional markets and short supply chains and initiate approaches geared to quality and promoting and protecting products (‘mountain products’, Protected Designations of Origin (PDO), Protected Geographical Indications (PGI) and Traditional Specialty Guaranteed (TSG));
Amendment 28 #
2015/2278(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that smart specialisation strategies (S3s) support thematic concentration and strategic programming of the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) and lead to increased performance orientation on the ground, thus contributing to the Europe 2020 objectives; emphasises that the aim of these strategies is to create knowledge- based and sustainable growth and harmonised development, not only in well- developed areas, but also in regions in transition as well as in less developed and rural regions;
Amendment 70 #
2015/2278(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for continued efforts to encourage a change of mentality and to promote innovative policy approaches to boost intraregional, inter-regional, extra-regional, cross-border and transnational collaboration;
Amendment 84 #
2015/2278(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the Commission and the existing bodies to provide additional assistance to those Member States in need of it for the implementation of the RIS3 strategy;
Amendment 137 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Points out that the United States, Russia, and China are intensifying programmes aimed at exploiting lunar resources; urges the Commission to work in coordination with the Member States and the European Space Agency with a view to safeguarding EU and Member State interests where the moon is concerned;
Amendment 389 #
2015/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Strongly urges European policy-makers to engage with citizens and, civil society, and local and regional authorities on the necessity and benefits of providing a stronger framework for Europe’s security.
Amendment 165 #
2015/2259(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Insists on the need for Member States to ensure that they have the necessary staff trainedand equipment to perform uniform and robust controls;
Amendment 12 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that persons with disabilities make a valuable contribution to society as a whole and also as successful entrepreneurs who often run small business, and that this enriching contribution can be even greater if the (working and entrepreneurial) environment is properly adapted, for which ESI Ffunds are needed;
Amendment 17 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Encourages the Member States as well as regional and local authorities to increasestrengthen their efforts in the area of prevention of discrimination and exclusion of persons with disabilities, including equal access to health care, housing, transport, product and services, education and employment while increasing the overall awareness of the different disabilities and the corresponding needs;
Amendment 28 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Is of the opinion that ESI funding should be used to support deinstitutionalisation and services andzation in a balanced way, meaning that instead of determining that all disabled people must live in homes, policy is framed around people having access to the same range of options as everyone else with regard to where they live and receiving the support they need, wherever they may and if they may choose; notes also that ESI funds should be used to support equal access services, including internet, as well as equal and sufficient living arrangements for persons with disabilities in local communities in all areas: rural and sparsely populated, urban, on equal basis;
Amendment 41 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Urges policy makers at local, regional, national and EU level to ensure efficient monitoring of the implementation of the provisions aimed at non-discrimination, as well as the accessibility of ESI funding and services to persons with disabilities and to the institutions that care for them;
Amendment 42 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Urges policy makers at local, regional, national and EU level to ensure efficient monitoring of the implementation of the provisions aimed at non-discrimination, as well as the accessibility and use of ESI funding and services to persons with disabilities;
Amendment 45 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes that the number of citizens with disabilities and/or functional limitations increases significantly within the ageing EU population and this poses an additional challenge and important task for which EFI funds can be of a great use, especially for regional and local authorities;
Amendment 125 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Takes the view that the next European Council on defence should not waste an opportunity to have a deep discussion and produce concrete proposals on reforming the financial arrangements for CSDP missions and operations; calls on the European Council, at that meeting, to consider establishing a new form of closer coordination on a firmer footing within European defence forces, between Member States and at EU level, to be achieved by effective pooling of all resources, capabilities, and assets; urges the Member States to deliver on the commitments undertaken at the European Council of December 2013;
Amendment 123 #
2015/2254(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas respect for cultural diversity and national, and regional and local, traditions may not impede a uniform and high level of protection of democracy, rule of law and fundamental rights (DRF);
Amendment 17 #
2015/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas CLLD has a bottom up approach with the aim to set up objects and finance projects linked with the local needs of the community rather than impose objectives at national level;
Amendment 44 #
2015/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Is concerned that certain Member States are reluctant to embrace the bottom-up approach and to entrust an adequate level of responsibilities to local groups; calls on the Commission, while fully remaining within its competences, to provide recommendations and concrete guidelines to Member States on how to overcome the trust issue between the different levels of governance related to the implementation of CLLD and ITI;
Amendment 57 #
2015/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers SMEs lack of financing and youth unemployment to be one of the most pressing issues facing a large number of Member States; stresses that local and territorial development strategies have to recognise tackling youth unemployment as one of their top priorities as well as supporting the access to finance for SMEs;
Amendment 77 #
2015/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Encourages the Member States to increase the use of CLLD and ITI and to allow more flexible rules in areas referred to in Article 174 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, such as islands, mountainous and rural regions; moreover, requests that the multi fund approach should be used while financing CLLDs and ITIs;
Amendment 78 #
2015/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Points out that in the 2014 -2020 programming period ITI and CLLD are addressed in the applicable legislative framework, but that there is a need for further guidance; therefore calls on the European Commission to provide this guidance before the start of new programming periods after 2020 in order to increase legal certainty for all parties;
Amendment 132 #
2015/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Is concerned about the results that CLLD will deliver, as small entities might get lost in the complexity of the regulation; therefore encourages Member States to embrace CLLD initiatives and to incorporate flexibility in their national policy frameworks;
Amendment 134 #
2015/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Regrets the fact that in some Member States the CLLD is restricted by national authorities to only one specific policy objective which is contrary to the bottom- up approach;
Amendment 135 #
2015/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Urges the Commission to provide guidance to Member States for financing CLLD through multi funds as well as encouraging the use of financing instruments;
Amendment 58 #
2015/2115(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Deplores the existing gap between financing rates granted to SMEs and those granted to bigger companies; considers that this long-standing problem is not appropriately addressed by the recent measures implemented by the ECB to boost bank lending and therefore calls for this problem to be addressed urgently;
Amendment 19 #
2015/2113(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that 70% of Europeans live in cities and calls for targeted measures from the Member States, in collaboration with local and regional authorities, towards smooth, cost- effective and energy-efficient urban transport;
Amendment 62 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas measures for developing the Energy Union and achieving the 2030 climate targets must take full account of the impacts on energy prices, costs and the competitiveness of the EU economy in order to get the necessary support from citizens and industrythe economy as a whole;
Amendment 688 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 b (new)
Paragraph 26 b (new)
26b. Supports the integration of the energy systems of candidate and potential candidate countries through a regional approach within the future European Energy Union;
Amendment 34 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that all policies to strengthen the electrification of transport need to accent railways, trams, electrified busses, electric cars, and e-bicycles, need to incorporate the entire lifecycle perspective and need to be based on renewable sources of electricity;
Amendment 137 #
2015/2110(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on Member States to implement public procurement monitoring instruments and to bar any undertaking which has proven links with organised crime from entering into an economic relationship with a public authority; calls on the Member States, accordingly, to introduce anti-organised crime certification for companies and calls for the relevant information to be exchanged automatically at EU level;
Amendment 19 #
2015/2103(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that robotics plays a keymajor role in improving the competitiveness and productivity of the European economy; calls on the Commission to promote a pro- innovation policy in robotics, facilitatensuring integration of technologies in value chains, and to assess the need to modernise legislation or develop European guidelines to ensure a joint approach in, and action on, robotics, essential for companies to scale up in Europe;
Amendment 36 #
2015/2103(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. education must pave the way for the next generation to be able to live fully productive lives in a world which will be changed by robotisation and automation; and as preparation for potential new areas of business that will develop;
Amendment 38 #
2015/2103(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Strongly believes that interoperability between systems, devices and cloud services, based on security and privacy by design, are essential for enabling real time data flows enabling robots to become more flexible and, autonomous, and efficient; asks the Commission to promote an open environment, from open standards and innovative licensing models, to open platforms and transparency, in order to avoid lock-in in proprietary systems that restrain interoperability;
Amendment 49 #
2015/2103(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. underlines that automated cars will require a high level of safe interaction with the transport infrastructure and that the high volume of data will need to be securely transferred in real time between automated vehicles and such infrastructure; calls on local and regional authorities to implement the applications required for the above purposes;
Amendment 63 #
2015/2103(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. A legislative initiative on robotics and artificial intelligence should provide legal certainty and guarantee privacy without stifling innovation;
Amendment 83 #
2015/2103(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. bearing in mind that innovative technological solutions for automated vehicle applications are developing rapidly, calls on the Commission to draw up legislation on transport using the automated vehicles that will result from technological change;
Amendment 95 #
2015/2103(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. it is necessary to anticipate the development of new business areas which could develop on the basis of the further development of robotics and artificial intelligence, and which would result in new jobs;
Amendment 40 #
2015/2095(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Supports the allocation of the designated amounts from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) during 2014- 2020 programming period to help with the integration of migrants and, in particular, the use of the ERDF for emergency measures concerning their accommodation; calls for funds to be earmarked from the European Social Fund (EFS) during the programming period 2014-2020 to increasing the speed of integration through language learning and training in line with the needs of the labour market;
Amendment 32 #
2015/2086(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the purpose of adoption is not to give adults the right to a child, but to give the child a loving and caring environment to grow up, learn and develop in a rounded way in;
Amendment 37 #
2015/2086(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas in some Member States the number of children being adopted is low, despite great interest from prospective adoptive parents;
Amendment 51 #
2015/2086(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas more work should be done in a determined manner in order to prevent prospective parents interested in adoption from being exploited by unscrupulous intermediary organisations;
Amendment 76 #
2015/2086(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas cooperation within the European Network of Ombudspersons for Children was established in 1997, and Europe's ombudsmen on children's matters should be encouraged to cooperate and coordinate activities more closely in that forum;
Amendment 134 #
2015/2086(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines that each adoption case is different and must be assessed on itsusing an individual meritsapproach;
Amendment 141 #
2015/2086(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that in the context of adoption proceedings, the child should always be given the opportunity to be heard without pressure and express his or her individual view on the adoption process; considers, therefore, that whenever possible the child's consent to the adoption should be sought;
Amendment 182 #
2015/2086(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the competent bodies in the Member States to establish national databases of children up for adoption;
Amendment 183 #
2015/2086(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Calls on the Commission to involve local and regional authorities in the exchange of information and best practices;
Amendment 184 #
2015/2086(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 c (new)
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13c. Calls on the Commission to devote particular attention to the issue of age limits on adoptive parents in the Member States;
Amendment 132 #
2015/2060(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – indent 5
Paragraph 9 – indent 5
– Urges that the Member States take seriously the coordination provisions of, without delay, harmonise their obligations under the Treaties;
Amendment 30 #
2015/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the establishment of a globally accepted and unambiguous definition of tax havens, of penalties for operatorbusinesses making use of them and of a blacklist of countries that do not combat tax evasion or accept it, as has already been called for previously;
Amendment 47 #
2015/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on EU bodies such as, for instance, the EIB and the EBRD not to cooperate any longer through their financial intermediaries with non-cooperative tax jurisdictionthe financial and judicial systems of countries that are unwilling to cooperate on taxation matters;
Amendment 124 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the adoption of an Automatic Exchange of Information mechanism, a fundamental tool for enhancing global transparency and cooperation in the fight against tax avoidance and tax evasion; acknowledges, however, that support, both financial and technical, and time isare needed for developing countries to build the required capacity to send and process information;
Amendment 1 #
2015/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the current discussions about a possible extension of the Geographical Indication (GI) protection of the European Union to non-agricultural products; considers that the EU is particularly rich in such authentic products based on local know-how and traditional local and regional production methods and often rooted in the heritage of a specific geographical area;
Amendment 4 #
2015/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas cohesion policy is first and foremost a Treaty-based policy, aimed at strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion in the Union, and in particular at reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regshall provide support, through multi-annual programmes, which complements national, regional and local intervention, to deliver the Union strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, as well as the Fund-specific missions pursuant to their Treaty-based objectives, including economic, social and territorial cohesion taking account of the relevant Europe 2020 Integrated Guidelines and the relevant country-specific recommendations;
Amendment 15 #
2015/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas there is evidence that good governance and efficient public institutions are basic conditions for strong economic and social development, although less attention has been paid to the impact of macroeconomic factors on the framework in which cohesion policy operatesgrowth and job creation;
Amendment 22 #
2015/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas economic and financial instability and unpredictability of regulatory framework may result in decreasing levels of public and private investment;
Amendment 27 #
2015/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 (new)
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Considers that a sound economic governance is the basis for an efficient, effective and result-oriented cohesion policy which could contribute to economic growth and jobs creation;
Amendment 34 #
2015/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that an increased emphasis on economic governance mechanisms cannot jeopardise support the achievement of the ESI Funds' policy objectives and goals;
Amendment 45 #
2015/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that macroeconomic conditionality must onlyalso be used to contribute to a more focused and result- driven implementation of the ESI Funds;
Amendment 51 #
2015/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls the multiannual and long-term nature of programmes and objectives under the ESI Funds, as well as their strong result-driven nature, as opposed to the annual cycle of the European semester and the rather weak implementation of the semester recommendations;
Amendment 55 #
2015/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that cohesion policy has played a vital role and has shown significant responsiveness to macroeconomic and fiscal constraints in the context of the current crisis, through the reprogramming of more than 11 % of the available budget between 2007 and 2012, in order to support the most pressing needs and strengthen certain interventions; highlights therefore that in several Member States the Cohesion policy represented more than 80 of public investments over the period 2007-2013;
Amendment 69 #
2015/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that the partnership agreements and programmes adopted in the current programming period have taken account of the relevant CSRs and the relevant Council recommendations, thus making any reprogramming unnecessary in the medium term;
Amendment 76 #
2015/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Is of the view that reprogramming should be avoided to the greatest extent, when possible, in order not to disrupt fund management or undermine the stability and predictability of the multiannual investment strategy; welcomes the cautious approach of the Commission in this regard and its intention to keep any reprogramming requests to a minimum;
Amendment 83 #
2015/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 91 #
2015/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Does not acceptIs concerned that the inability to properly address macroeconomic issues at national level may penalise subnational authorities or call in question the territorial approach of cohesion policyof national governments to follow a sound economic policy may penalise beneficiaries and applicants in case of payment suspensions triggered by the second stand of Article 23 of the Common Provisions Regulation;
Amendment 96 #
2015/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 100 #
2015/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Asks the Commission to apply Article 23 CPR in line with the principle of proportionality, by properly taking into account the real situation of those Member States and regions which are facing socio-economic difficulties and where ESI Funds represent a significant share of investment;
Amendment 114 #
2015/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Points out that the decision on the suspension of payments should be taken as a last resort, because suspending payments could have serious consequences for the respective programmes and regions severely hit by crisis, as well as for the achievement of cohesion policy goals as a whole;
Amendment 12 #
2015/2040(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Takes the view that it would be easier to guarantee the independence of Commissioners-designate if the Commission were not composed of one national of each Member State, in accordance with the spirit of Article 17(5) of the Treaty on European Union; takes the view that the Commissioners’ portfolios and the respective remits of the parliamentary committees should be linked; therefore calls on the European Council to review its decision on the number of Commissioners and to reduce it before the next Commission is appointthe Commissioners’ portfolios and the respective remits of the parliamentary committees should be linked;
Amendment 3 #
2015/2013(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Regrets, however, that the 2014 contributions from the ERDF to the cross- border programmes under the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) and the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) are transferred to 2017; considers that these programmes, although being limited in financial terms, are of great importance for both the Member States and especially candidate or neighbouring countries involved; stresses the potential difficulties and delays that this transfer may cause at the operational level, despite the commitments envisaged for 2015 and 2016;
Amendment 5 #
2015/2013(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Is concerned that a high proportion of programmes is still pending adoption, and considers essential that all programmes are adopted and rolled out as soon as possible, so that the implementation of the policy suffers no further delays; in this regard invites the Commission to undertake higher efforts and support Member States and regions in adopting the programmes;
Amendment 13 #
2015/2013(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Takes note of the unilateral statement by Croatia, Greece, Italy, Romania and Spain on the amendment of the Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-20201a; _________________ 1a OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 884.
Amendment 14 #
2015/2013(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Considers that the Commission proposal to transfer the unused allocation of Cohesion and Structural Funds from 2014 to only 2015 instead of spreading it over the whole period could lead to decommitment for several Member States, in which the ESIF funds represent the main source of public investment; asks, therefore, the Commission to carefully follow the commitment and payments allocation for 2015 until 2018 for each Member State and take any legislative and budgetary initiative to address the risk of decommitment which leads to the risk of not achieving the Cohesion policy objectives.
Amendment 6 #
2015/2011(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates the role of the Union budget in creating added value by pooling resources and contributing to the multiplying effect of Union spending; supports the mobilisation of additional sources of private and public finance to fund investment on goals of a European dimension, in particular by addressing to create and provide regular cross-border challengesommunication in areas such as energy, digital and transport infrastructure;
Amendment 43 #
2015/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Member States, as well as regional and local authorities, to use existing EU-level funding resources to support initiatives pursuing links with businesses and offering entrepreneurship education to low-income young people, school dropouts, young people in danger of long-term unemployment and young people with disabilities;
Amendment 75 #
2015/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Member States, as well as regional and local authorities, to offer micro-scholarships and micro-loans schemes to innovative students in secondary and tertiary education respectively in order to start their own ventures or projects;
Amendment 206 #
2015/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Member States, as well as regional and local authorities, to promote the development of entrepreneurship- friendly environments which will facilitate young people’s start-ups and enable quick recovery from initial failures;
Amendment 213 #
2015/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Member States, as well as regional and local authorities, to make use of the EU Structural Funds in order to promote entrepreneurship education and training at national, regional and local level;
Amendment 98 #
2015/2005(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that a European sustainable mobility policy needs to build on a broad range of policy tools to shift towards the least polluting and most energy-efficient modes of transport; points out that shifting the balance between modes of transport is not an end in itself, but is necessary to disconnect mobility from its adverse effects such as congestion, air pollution of the air, soil and sea, noise, accidents and climate change;
Amendment 327 #
2015/2005(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to address the quality of work in all transport modes, with respect in particular to training, certification, working conditions and career development, with a view to creating quality jobs, developing the necessary skills and strengthening the competitiveness of EU transport operators;
Amendment 335 #
2015/2005(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Urges the Commission and the Member States to ensure that proposals on the opening-up of services in all transport markets do not lead to social dumping, poorer-quality services, monopolies or oligopolies;
Amendment 620 #
2015/2005(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 – indent 6
Paragraph 29 – indent 6
– consideration of whether the governance and regulatory system of the Rhine can be applied to the Danube, to allow a quick economic development of that regmacroregion in accordance with the Danube Strategy of the European Union,
Amendment 117 #
2015/0287(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The supplier shall supply the digital content immediately after the conclusion of the contract, unless the parties have agreed otherwise. The supply shall be deemed to take place when the agreed-upon digital content is supplied to the consumer or, where point (b) of paragraph 1 applies, to the third party chosen by the consumer, whichever is the earlier.
Amendment 64 #
2015/0278(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall ensure that the public is informed of the existence, responsibilities and identity of the authorities referred to in the first subparagraph. Those authorities shall make the information on their own work and the decisions they have taken available in accessible formats upon request from the public concerned.
Amendment 61 #
2015/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 6
Article 73 – paragraph 6
6. Upon request ofAfter the inspection has been conducted, the Agency shall make available to the Member State, the reports drawn up by the Agency pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be made available to it in the official Union language or languages of the Member State where the inspection took place.
Amendment 139 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 - point c a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 - point c a (new)
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new)
(ca) the following paragraph 4a is inserted: ‘4a. Member States shall adopt a strategy for meeting the targets referred to in paragraph 1 by [insert date 18 months from the date referred to in Article 2(1) of this amending Directive] at the latest. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of that strategy.’
Amendment 177 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 12 – paragraph 3 c
Article 12 – paragraph 3 c
3c. The Commission shall review the data reported in accordance with this Article and publish a report on the results of its review. The report shall cover an assessment of the organisation of the data collection, the sources of data and the methodology used in Member States as well as the completeness, reliability, timeliness and consistency of that data, and shall compare expected and actual progress towards meeting the deadline laid down in Article 6. The assessment may include specific recommendations for improvement. The report shall be drawn up every three years.
Amendment 275 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d a (new)
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 5 a (new)
(da) the following paragraph 5a is inserted: 5a. Member States shall each adopt a strategy for meeting the target referred to in Article 6 by [insert date 18 months after the laws and other provisions necessary to comply with this Directive have been brought into force] at the latest. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those strategies.
Amendment 354 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 12 – paragraph 3 c
Article 12 – paragraph 3 c
3c. The Commission shall review the data reported in accordance with this Article and publish a report on the results of its review. The report shall cover an assessment of the organisation of the data collection, the sources of data and the methodology used in Member States as well as the completeness, reliability, timeliness and consistency of that dataose data, and shall compare expected and actual progress towards meeting the deadline laid down in Article 6. The assessment may include specific recommendations for improvement. The report shall be drawn up every three years.
Amendment 388 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Estonia, Greece, Croatia, Latvia, Malta, Romania and Slovakia may obtain five additional years for the attainment of the targets referred to in paragraph 2(c) and (d). The Member State shall notify the Commission of its intention to make use of this provision at the latest 2436 months before the respective deadlines laid down in paragraphs 2(c) and (d). In the event of an extension, the Member State shall take the necessary measures to increase the preparing for re-use and the recycling of municipal waste to a minimum of 540% and 650% by weight, by 2025 and 2030 respectively.
Amendment 393 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e a (new)
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new)
(ea) the following paragraph 4a is inserted: ‘4a. For Estonia, Greece, Croatia, Latvia, Malta, Romania, and Slovakia the Commission shall examine the targets laid down in paragraph 2(c) and (d) in two stages, at the first stage no later than 31 December 2020 and at the second stage no later than 31 December 2024.’
Amendment 394 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e b (new)
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 4 b (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 4 b (new)
(eb) the following paragraph 4b is inserted: ‘4b. Member States shall adopt a strategy for meeting the targets referred to in paragraph 2(c) and (d) by [insert date 18 months from the date referred to in Article 2(1) of this amending Directive] at the latest. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of that strategy.’
Amendment 1068 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Estonia, Greece, Croatia, Latvia, Malta, Romania and Slovakia may obtain five additional years for the attainment of the targets referred to in paragraph 2(c) and (d). The Member State shall notify the Commission of its intention to make use of this provision at the latest 2436 months before the respective deadlines laid down in paragraphs 2(c) and (d). In the event of an extension, the Member State shall take the necessary measures to increase the preparing for re-use and the recycling of municipal waste to a minimum of 540% and 650% by weight, by 2025 and 2030 respectively.
Amendment 1075 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. For Estonia, Greece, Croatia, Latvia, Malta, Romania, and Slovakia, the Commission shall examine the targets laid down in paragraph 2(c) and (d) in two stages, no later than 31 December 2020, and at the second stage no later than 31 December 2024.
Amendment 72 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Estonia, Greece, Croatia, Latvia, Malta, Romania and Slovakia may obtain five additional years for the attainment of the target referred to in paragraph 5. The Member State shall notify the Commission of its intention to make use of this provision at the latest 2436 months before the deadline laid down in paragraph 5. In the event of an extension, the Member State shall take the necessary measures to reduce by 2030 the amount of municipal waste landfilled to 230% of the total amount of municipal waste generated.
Amendment 78 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. For Estonia, Greece, Croatia, Latvia, Malta, Romania, and Slovakia the Commission shall examine the target laid down in paragraph 5 in two stages, at the first stage no later than 31 December 2020 and at the second stage no later than 31 December 2024.
Amendment 91 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 15 – paragraph 4
Article 15 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall review the data reported in accordance with this Article and publish a report on the results of its review. The report shall assess the organisation of the data collection, the sources of data and the methodology used in Member States as well as the completeness, reliability, timeliness and consistency of that data, and shall compare expected and actual progress towards meeting the deadline laid down in Article 5(5). The assessment may include specific recommendations for improvement. The report shall be drawn up every three years.
Amendment 109 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Member States shall each adopt a strategy for meeting the target referred to in Article 5(5) within the deadline laid down in Article 5(5) by [insert date 18 months after the laws and other provisions necessary to comply with this Directive have been brought into force] at the latest. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those strategies.
Amendment 115 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Member States shall adopt a strategy for meeting the target referred to in paragraph 5 within the deadline laid down in paragraph 5 by [enter date 18 months from the date referred to in Article 2 of this amending Directive] at the latest. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of that strategy.
Amendment 123 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
6. Estonia, Greece, Croatia, Latvia, Malta, Romania and Slovakia may obtain five additional years for the attainment of the target referred to in paragraph 5. The Member State shall notify the Commission of its intention to make use of this provision at the latest 2436 months before the deadline laid down in paragraph 5. In the event of an extension, the Member State shall take the necessary measures to reduce by 2030 the amount of municipal waste landfilled to 230% of the total amount of municipal waste generated.
Amendment 136 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new)
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 7 a (new)
(ca) the following paragraph 7a is added: ‘7a. For Estonia, Greece, Croatia, Latvia, Malta, Romania, and Slovakia the Commission shall examine the target laid down in paragraph 5 in two stages, respectively no later than 31 December 2020 and, at the second stage, no later than 31 December 2024.’
Amendment 158 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 15 – paragraph 4
Article 15 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall review the data reported in accordance with this Article and publish a report on the results of its review. The report shall cover an assessment of the organisation of the data collection, the sources of data and the methodology used in Member States as well as the completeness, reliability, timeliness and consistency of that dataose data, and shall compare expected and actual progress towards meeting the deadline laid down in Article 5(5). The assessment may include specific recommendations for improvement. The report shall be drawn up every three years.
Amendment 73 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Reforms are by their very nature complex processes that require a complete chain of highly-specialised knowledge and skills. Addressing structural reforms in a variety of public policy areas is challenging since their benefits often take time to materialise. Therefore, eartimely and efficient design and implementation is crucial, be it for crisis-struck or structurally-weak economies. In this context, the provision of support by the Union in the form of technical assistance has been crucial in supporting the economic adjustment of Greece and Cyprus in the last years.
Amendment 76 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Support under the Programme should be provided by the Commission upon request by a Member State, in areas such as budget and taxation, public function, institutional and administrative reforms, the justice system, anti-fraud, anti-corruption and anti-money laundering, business environment, private sector development, investment, competition, public procurement, privatization processes, access to finance, investment, trade, sustainable regional development, innovation, education and training, labour policies, public health, asylum, migration policies, agriculture and rural development, sustainable tourism, and financial sector policies.
Amendment 82 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The Union has a long-lasting experience on providing specific support to local, regional and national administrations and other authorities of Member States as regards capacity building and similar actions in certain sectors (e.g. taxation, customs, support to small and medium-sized enterprises) and in relation to the implementation of cohesion policy. The experience gained by the Union in assisting national authorities carrying out reforms should be used in order to enhance the capacity of the Union to provide support to Member States. Comprehensive and integrated action is indeed necessary in order to provide support to those Member States that are undertaking growth- enhancing reforms and request assistance from the Union in this respect.
Amendment 89 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Against this background, it is necessary to establish a Structural Reform Support Programme ('the Programme') with the objective of strengthening the capacity of Member States to prepare and implement growth-enhancing administrative and structural reforms, including through assistance for the efficient and effective use of the Union funds, or other programmes. The Programme is intended to contribute to the achievement of common goals towards obtaining economic recovery, job creation, boosting Europe's competitiveness and stimulating investment in the real economy.
Amendment 95 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Support under the Programme should be provided by the Commission upon request by a Member State, in areas such as regional and urban policy, budget and taxation, public function, institutional and administrative reforms, the justice system, anti-fraud, anti-corruption and anti-money laundering, business environment, private sector development, investment, competition, public procurement, privatization processes, access to finance, investment, trade, sustainable development, innovation, education and training, labour policies, public health, asylum, migration policies, agriculture and rural development and financial sector policies.
Amendment 96 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Support under the Programme should be provided by the Commission upon request by a Member State, in areas such as budget and taxation, public function, institutional and administrative reforms, territorial organization, decentralization, the justice system, anti- fraud, anti-corruption and anti-money laundering, business environment, private sector development, investment, competition, public procurement, privatization processes, access to finance, investment, trade, sustainable tourism, sustainable development, innovation, education and training, labour policies, public health, asylum, migration policies, agriculture and rural development and financial sector policies.
Amendment 103 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Member States should be able to request support from the Commission under the Programme in relation to the implementation of reforms in the context of economic governance processes, in particular of Country Specific Recommendations in the context of the European Semester, to actions related to the implementation of Union law, as well as in relation to the implementation of economic adjustment programmes. They should also be able to request support in relation to reforms undertaken at their own initiative, in order to achieve economic, social and territorial cohesion, sustainable investment, economic growth and job creation.
Amendment 110 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) FIn the respect of the partnership principle as defined in the European code of conduct, further to a dialogue with the requesting Member State and the relevant subnational authorities, including in the context of the European Semester, the Commission should analyse the request, taking into account the principles of transparency, equal treatment and sound financial management and determine the support to be provided based on urgency, breadth and depth of the problems as identified, support needs in respect of the policy areas envisaged, analysis of socioeconomic indicators, and the general administrative capacity of the Member State and local and regional authorities. The Commission should also, in close cooperation with the Member State concerned, identify the priority areas, the scope of the support measures to be provided and the global financial contribution for such support, taking into account the existing actions and measures financed by Union funds or other Union programmes.
Amendment 111 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to contribute to the institutional, administrative and structural reforms in the Member States by providing support to national authorities for measures aimed at reforming institutions, governancethe territorial governance structure at national, regional, and local level, administration, economic and social sectors, including through assistance for the efficient and effective use of the Union funds, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States alone, but can rather, by reason of their scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective, since the scope of the support would be mutually agreed with the Member State concerned.
Amendment 117 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Further to a dialogue with the requesting Member State, including in the context of the European Semester, the Commission should analyse the request, taking into account the principles of transparency, equal treatment and sound financial management and determine the support to be provided based on urgency, breadth and depthseverity of the problems as identified, support needs in respect of the policy areas envisaged, analysis of socioeconomic indicators, and the general administrative capacity of the Member State. The Commission should also, in close cooperation with the Member State concerned, identify the priority areas, the scope of the support measures to be provided and the global financial contribution for such support, taking into account the existing actions and measures financed by Union funds or other Union programmes.
Amendment 119 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) The Commission Communications ‘The EU Budget Review’13 and ‘A budget for Europe 2020’14 underline the importance of focusing funding on activities with clear European added value, i.e. where the Union intervention can bring additional value compared to action of Member States alone. Against this background, the support actions carried out under the Programme should ensure complementarity and synergy with other programmes and policies at regional, national, Union and international level, including the macroregional level. The actions under the Programme should allow elaborating and implementing solutions that address national challenges which have impact on cross-border or Union-wide challenges and achieve a consistent and coherent implementation of Union law. In addition, they should contribute to further develop trust and promote cooperation with the Commission and among Member States. Moreover, the Union is in a better position than Member States to provide an efficient platform for the provision and sharing of good practices from peers as well as to mobilise expertise. __________________ 13 14COM(2010)700 of 19 October 2010. COM(2010)700 of 19 October 2010. 14 COM(2011)500 final of 29 June 2011. COM(2011)500 final of 29 June 2011.
Amendment 120 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the development and implementation of solutions that address national challenges which have impact on cross-border or Union-wide challenges, and that contribute to social and economic cohesion;
Amendment 123 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) The Commission Communications ‘The EU Budget Review’13 and ‘A budget for Europe 2020’14 underline the importance of focusing funding on activities with clear European added value, i.e. where the Union intervention can bring additional value compared to action of Member States alone. Against this background, the support actions carried out under the Programme should ensure complementarity and synergy with other programmes and policies at local, regional, national, Union and international level. The actions under the Programme should allow elaborating and implementing solutions that address local, regional and national challenges which have impact on cross- border or Union-wide challenges and achieve a consistent and coherent implementation of Union law. In addition, they should contribute to further develop trust and promote cooperation with the Commission and among Member States. Moreover, the Union is in a better position than Member States to provide a platform for the provision and sharing of good practices from peers as well as to mobilise expertise. __________________ 13 14COM(2010)700 of 19 October 2010. COM(2010)700 of 19 October 2010. 14 COM(2011)500 final of 29 June 2011. COM(2011)500 final of 29 June 2011.
Amendment 139 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to support the national authorities to enhance their capacity to plan and formulate, develop and implement reform policies and strategies and pursue an integrated approach ensuring consistency between goals and means across sectors;
Amendment 139 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) In the event of unforeseen and duly justified grounds of urgency requiring immediate response, such as a serious disturbance in the economy or significant circumstances seriously affecting the economic or social conditions in a Member State going beyond its control, upon request of a Member State, the Commission should be able to adopt urgent special measures, for a limited proportion of the annual work programme, in accordance with objectives and actions eligible under the Programme to support the national authorities in addressing the urgent needs.
Amendment 142 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) In order to ensure the efficient and coherent allocation of funds from the Union budget and the principle of sound financial management, actions under this Programme should complement, coordinated and be additional to ongoing Union programmes, whilst avoiding double funding for the same expenditure. In particular, the Commission and the Member State concerned, in accordance with their respective responsibilities should ensure at Union and Member State levels, in all stages of the process, effective coordination in order to ensure consistency, compliance, complementarity and synergy between sources of funding supporting actions in the relevant Member States with close links to this Programme, specifically with measures being financed from the Union funds, and other EU programmes in the Member States.
Amendment 144 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) to assist the national, regional, and local authorities to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of human resources management, where appropriate, through definition of clear responsibilities and increase of professional knowledge and skills.
Amendment 156 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) institutional reform and efficient and service-oriented functioning of public administration, including efficient territorial organisation, effective rule of law, reform of the justice system and reinforcement of anti-fraud, anti-corruption and anti-money laundering;
Amendment 159 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to contribute to the institutional, administrative and structural reforms in the Member States by providing support to national authorities for measures aimed at reforming institutions, governance, public administration, economic and social sectors, including through assistance for the efficient and effective use of the Union funds cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States alone, but can rather, by reason of their scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective, since the scope of the support would be mutually agreed with the Member State concerned.
Amendment 160 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24 a (new)
Recital 24 a (new)
(24a) Member States that request support from the Programme might contribute with additional funds to the financial envelope of the Programme. Currently, Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 limits the possibility of a transfer of resources dedicated to technical assistance at the initiative of a Member State to those Member States which face temporary budgetary difficulties. Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 should therefore be amended in order to allow all Member States to participate financially to the Programme. The resources transferred to the Union budget should be used for supporting actions contributing to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth or Fund-specific purposes in the Member States concerned. The transfer of the additional funds from the Member States' technical assistance, mentioned above, should be approved by means of a delegated act.
Amendment 166 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the development and implementation of solutions that address local, regional and national challenges which have impact on cross-border or Union-wide challenges;
Amendment 167 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) their complementarity and synergy with other Union programmes and policies at local, regional and national, Union and international level;
Amendment 174 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
The general objective of the Programme shall be to contribute to institutional, administrative and structural reforms in the Member States by providing support to national authorities for measures aimed at reforming institutions, governance, administration, economic and social sectors in response to economic and social challenges with a view to enhancing competitiveness, of EU enterprises, in particular SMEs and their access to finances, economic growth, jobs, creation and investment, in particular in the context of economic governance processes, including through assistance for the efficient and effective use of the Union funds.
Amendment 175 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
The general objective of the Programme shall be to contribute to institutional, administrative and structural reforms in the Member States by providing support to national authorities for measures aimed at reforming institutions, governance, public administration, economic and social sectors in response to economic and social challengeneeds with a view to enhancing competitiveness, sustainable economy, growth, jobs, and investment, in particular in the context of economic governance processes, including through assistance for the efficient and effective use of the Union funds, and other EU programmes.
Amendment 181 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. TIn accordance with the partnership principle, to achieve the general objective set out in Article 4, the Programme shall have the following specific objectives:
Amendment 230 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Taking into account the principles of partnership, transparency, equal treatment and sound financial management, further to a dialogue with the Member State, including in the context of the European Semester, the Commission shall analyse the request for support referred to in paragraph 1 based on the urgency, breadth and depth of the problems identified, support needs in respect of the policy areas concerned, analysis of territorial and socioeconomic indicators and general administrative capacity of the Member State. Taking into account the existing actions and measures financed by Union funds or other Union programmes, the Commission in close cooperation with the Member State concerned and the relevant subnational authorities shall identify the priority areas for support, the scope of the support measures to be provided and the global financial contribution for such support.
Amendment 246 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. The Beneficiary Member State, in coordination with the Commission, may enter into partnership with one or more other Member States and their local and regional authorities which shall act as Reform Partners in respect of specific areas of reform. A Reform Partner shall, in coordination with the Commission, help formulate strategy, reform roadmaps, design high-quality assistance or oversee implementation of strategy and projects.
Amendment 248 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 a (new)
Article 10 a (new)
Amendment 252 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6
Article 12 – paragraph 6
6. To ensure timely availability of resources, the annual work programme may indicate that in the event of unforeseen and duly justified grounds of urgency requiring an immediate response, including a serious disturbance in the economy or significant circumstances seriously affecting the economic or social conditions in a Member State going beyond its control, the Commission may, on request by a Member State, adopt urgent special measures in accordance with the objectives and actions defined in this Regulation to support the national authorities in addressing urgent needs. Such special measures may account only for a limited proportion of the annual work programme and shall not be subject to the conditions set out in Article 7.
Amendment 253 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ensure complementarity and synergy between different instruments at Union and, national, regional, and local levels, in particular in relation to measures financed by Union funds, both in the planning phase and during implementation;
Amendment 259 #
2015/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 a (new)
Article 17 a (new)
Amendment 646 #
2015/0148(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 10 d (2)
Article 10 d (2)
2. The fund shall also finance small- scale investment projects in the modernisation of energy systems and energy efficiency, as well as the elimination of the consequences of energy poverty. To this end, the investment board shall develop guidelines and investment selection criteria specific to such projects.
Amendment 87 #
2015/0051(NLE)
Recital 7
(7) Member States and the Union should also address the social impact of the crisis and aim at building a cohesive society in which people are empowered to anticipate and manage change, and can actively participate in society and the economy. Access and opportunities for all should be ensured and poverty and social exclusion reduced, in particular by ensuring an effective functioning of labour markets and social welfare systems and removing barriers to labour market participation. Member States should also make sure that the benefits of economic growth reach all citizens and all regional and local entities.
Amendment 111 #
2015/0051(NLE)
Annex 1 – section 1 – paragraph 1
Member States, in cooperation with local and regional authorities, should facilitate job creation, reduce barriers for business to hire people, promote entrepreneurship and in particular support the creation and growth of small enterprises in order to increase the employment rate of women and men. Member States should also actively promote the social economy and foster social innovation.
Amendment 140 #
2015/0051(NLE)
Annex 1 – section 2 – paragraph 1
Member States should promote productivity and employability through an appropriate supply of relevant knowledge and skills. Member States should make the necessary investments in education and vocational training systems while improving their effectiveness and efficiency to raise the skill level of the workforce, allowing it to better anticipate and meet the rapidly changing needs of dynamic labour markets in an increasingly digital economy. Member States, in cooperation with local and regional authorities, should step up efforts to improve access to quality adult learning for all and implement active ageing strategies to enable longer working lives.
Amendment 156 #
2015/0051(NLE)
Annex 1 – section 2 – paragraph 3
Structural weaknesses in education and training systems should be addressed to ensure quality learning outcomes and prevent and tackle early school leaving. Member States, in cooperation with local and regional authorities, should increase educational attainment and consider dual learning systems and upgrading professional training while at the same time increaseing opportunities for recognising skills acquired outside the formal education system.
Amendment 220 #
2015/0051(NLE)
Annex 1 – section 4 – paragraph 1
Member States, in cooperation with local and regional authorities, should modernise their social protection systems to provide effective, efficient, and adequate protection throughout all stages of an individual’s life, ensuring fairness and addressing inequalities. There is a need for simplified and better targeted social policies complemented by affordable quality childcare and education, training and job assistance, housing support and accessible health care, access to basic services such as a bank account and Internet and for action to prevent early school leaving and fight social exclusion.
Amendment 27 #
2015/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In order to provide for detailed rules as regards placing on the market of seal products, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations, including at expert level and with Inuit and other indigenous communities concerned. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 31 #
2015/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In order to provide for detailed rules as regards placing on the market of seal products, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations, including at expert level and with the Inuit and other indigenous communities concerned. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 28 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The purpose of the EFSI shall be to support investments in the Union and to ensure an increased and more access toible financing for companies having up to 3000 employees, with a particular focus on small and medium enterprises, through the supply of risk bearing capacity to the EIB ('EFSI Agreement').
Amendment 29 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The EFSI Agreement shall be open to accession by Member States. Subject to the consent of existing contributors, the EFSI Agreement shall also be open to accession by other third parties, including national promotional banks or public agencies owned or controlled by Member States, regional and local authorities and private sector entities.
Amendment 31 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) development of infrastructure, including in the areas of transport, particularly in industrial and tourist centres; energy, in particular energy interconnections; and digital infrastructure;
Amendment 39 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission and the EIB, with support from the Member States and regional and local authorities, shall promote the creation of a transparent pipeline of current and potential future investment projects in the Union. The pipeline is without prejudice to the final projects selected for support according to Article 3(5).
Amendment 40 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States and regional and local authorities shall develop, update and disseminate, on a regular and structured basis, information on current and future investment projects in their territory.
Amendment 43 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The purpose of the EFSI shall be to support investments in the Union and to ensure increased and more access toible financing for companies having up to 3000 employees, with a particular focus on small and medium enterprises, through the supply of risk bearing capacity to the EIB ('EFSI Agreement').
Amendment 47 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The EFSI Agreement shall be open to accession by Member States. Subject to the consent of existing contributors, the EFSI Agreement shall also be open to accession by other third parties, including national promotional banks or public agencies owned or controlled by Member States, regional and local authorities and private sector entities.
Amendment 68 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) development of infrastructure, including in the areas of transport, particularly in industrial and tourist centres; energy, in particular energy interconnections; and digital infrastructure;
Amendment 82 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission and the EIB, with support from the Member States, regional and local authorities shall promote the creation of a transparent pipeline of current and potential future investment projects in the Union. The pipeline is without prejudice to the final projects selected for support according to Article 3(5).
Amendment 85 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States and regional and local authorities shall develop, update and disseminate, on a regular and structured basis, information on current and future investment projects in their territory.
Amendment 87 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The purpose of the EFSI shall be to support investments in the Union and to ensure an increased and more access toible financing for companies having up to 3000 employees, with a particular focus on small and medium enterprises, through the supply of risk bearing capacity to the EIB ('EFSI Agreement').
Amendment 91 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The EFSI Agreement shall be open to accession by Member States. Subject to the consent of existing contributors, the EFSI Agreement shall also be open to accession by other third parties, including national promotional banks or public agencies owned or controlled by Member States, regional and local authorities and private sector entities.
Amendment 94 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The purpose of the EFSI shall be to support investments in the Union and to ensure an increased and more access toible financing for companies having up to 3000 employees, with a particular focus on small and medium enterprises, through the supply of risk bearing capacity to the EIB ('EFSI Agreement').
Amendment 97 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The EFSI Agreement shall be open to accession by Member States. Subject to the consent of existing contributors, the EFSI Agreement shall also be open to accession by other third parties, including national promotional banks or public agencies owned or controlled by Member States, regional and local authorities, and private sector entities.
Amendment 113 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The Investment Committee shall be composed of six independent experts and the Managing Director. Independent experts shall have a high level of relevant market experience in project finance, awareness on regional specificities and disparities and be appointed by the Steering Board for a renewable fixed term of three years.
Amendment 117 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) development of infrastructure, including in the areas of transport, particularly in industrial and tourist centres; energy, in particular energy interconnections; and digital infrastructure;
Amendment 124 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) development of infrastructure, including in the areas of transport, particularly in industrial and tourist centres; energy, in particular energy interconnections; and digital infrastructure;
Amendment 147 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission and the EIB, with support from the Member States and regional and local authorities, shall promote the creation of a transparent pipeline of current and potential future investment projects in the Union. The pipeline is without prejudice to the final projects selected for support according to Article 3(5).
Amendment 148 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission and the EIB, with support from the Member States and regional and local authorities, shall promote the creation of a transparent pipeline of current and potential future investment projects in the Union. The pipeline is without prejudice to the final projects selected for support according to Article 3(5).
Amendment 150 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States and regional and local authorities shall develop, update and disseminate, on a regular and structured basis, information on current and future investment projects in their territory.
Amendment 153 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States and regional and local authorities shall develop, update and disseminate, on a regular and structured basis, information on current and future investment projects in their territory.
Amendment 214 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The purpose of the EFSI shall be to support investments in the Union and to ensure increased and more access toible financing for companies having up to 3000 employees, with a particular focus on small and medium enterprises, through the supply of risk bearing capacity to the EIB ('EFSI Agreement').
Amendment 217 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The EFSI Agreement shall be open to accession by Member States. Subject to the consent of existing contributors, the EFSI Agreement shall also be open to accession by other third parties, including national promotional banks or public agencies owned or controlled by Member States, regional and local authorities, and private sector entities.
Amendment 234 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The purpose of the EFSI shall be to support investments in the Union and to ensure increased and more readily access toible financing for companies having up to 3000 employees, with a particular focus on small and medium enterprises, through the supply of risk -bearing capacity to the EIB (‘EFSI Agreement’).
Amendment 246 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The EFSI Agreement shall be open to accession by Member States. Subject to the consent of existing contributors, the EFSI Agreement shall also be open to accession by other third parties, including national promotional banks or public agencies owned or controlled by Member States or regional or local authorities, and private sector entities.
Amendment 282 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) development of infrastructure, including in the areas of transport, particularly in industrial and tourism centres; energy, in particular energy interconnections; and digital infrastructure;
Amendment 314 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission and the EIB, with support from the Member States and regional and local authorities, shall promote the creation of a transparent pipeline of current and potential future investment projects in the Union. The pipeline is without prejudice to the final projects selected for support according to Article 3(5).
Amendment 321 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States, as well as local and regional authorities, shall develop, update and disseminate, on a regular and structured basis, information on current and future investment projects in their territory.
Amendment 348 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) development of infrastructure, including in the areas of transport, particularly in industrial and tourist centres; energy, in particular energy interconnections; and digital infrastructure;
Amendment 468 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission and the EIB, with support from the Member States and regional and local authorities, shall promote the creation of a transparent pipeline of current and potential future investment projects in the Union. The pipeline is without prejudice to the final projects selected for support according to Article 3(5).
Amendment 474 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States and regional and local authorities shall develop, update and disseminate, on a regular and structured basis, information on current and future investment projects in their territory.
Amendment 28 #
2015/0005(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. A pre-condition for granting the Union's macro financial assistance shall be that Ukraine respects effective democratic mechanisms, including a multi-party parliamentary system, fundamental rights and the rule of law, and guarantees respect for human rights.
Amendment 202 #
2014/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 e (new)
Paragraph 3 e (new)
3e. Points out that copyright is a driving force for social and economic development in the broadest sense; notes that within the EU the cultural and creative industries which rely on copyright generate 4.2% of GDP and provide 7 million jobs; notes that the potential of this kind offered by the cultural and creative industry also derives from the fact that, in the EU, rights last for 70 years from the time of the author’s death, in accordance with the Berne Convention, which lays down minimum standards for the duration of protection;
Amendment 347 #
2014/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 c (new)
Paragraph 11 c (new)
11c. Calls on the Commission to examine the present limitations and exceptions with a view to bringing about policies to boost the development of the existing market, an aim which can be achieved only by ensuring a proper reward for authors, that is to say, those who create the products offered on that market, and by providing legal certainty;
Amendment 414 #
2014/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the EU legislator to ensure that the use of photographs, video footagis initiative on copyright makes for wider understanding of artistry and creativity and their importance for other images of works which are permanently located in public places is permitted development of society and to prevent the parasitic development of new commercial interests at the expense of authors and their rights;
Amendment 429 #
2014/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Maintains that the development of the digital market is impossible unless creative and cultural industries are developed alongside it;
Amendment 33 #
2014/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas visible discrepancies exist between Member States and regional and local authorities as regards active ageing policies, support infrastructure and budgetary resources;
Amendment 97 #
2014/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to study the worrying problem of unemployment among people over the age of 50 and, in conjunction with the Member States and with regional and local authorities, to develop effective tools for reintegrating such workers into the labour market;
Amendment 260 #
2014/2254(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – point c
Paragraph 6 – point c
(c) ensuring the full involvement, at the launch and dialogue stages, not only of the Commission and the Member State in question, but also of the European Parliament, the Council, national parliaments, regional and local authorities, the FRA and civil society, and guaranteeing the use of all available data;
Amendment 320 #
2014/2254(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on regional and local authorities actively to promote respect for fundamental freedoms and tolerance;
Amendment 454 #
2014/2254(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Urges the EU and, the Member States, and regional and local authorities to ban all discrimination on grounds of gender identity and to combat and prosecute all forms of violence and discrimination against women;
Amendment 537 #
2014/2254(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Deplores the discrimination and exclusion that persons with a disabilitythe disabled are still faceing today; calls on the Commission and, the Member States, and regional and local authorities to implement the European Disability Strategy and to monitor and apply the relevant European legislation;
Amendment 5 #
2014/2253(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that in a European Union founded on the rule of law and on the certainty and predictability of laws, EU citizens must be the first to be made aware in a clear, accessible, transparent and timely manner (including via the internet) whether and which national laws have been adopted in transposition of EU laws, and which national authorities are responsible for ensuring they are correctly implemented;
Amendment 33 #
2014/2252(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. NotesStresses that there is a great danger of incoherence to the extent that legislative proposals may change dramatically during the lead-up to adoption by the institutions; recalls that a check on compliance with the principle of subsidiarity is only undertaken at the outset and not at the conclusion of the legislative process; further recalls that impact assessments more generally are only prepared for the initial rather than the final stages of the legislative process;
Amendment 41 #
2014/2247(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for an exchange of good practices andt every level, that is to say, national, regional, and local levels, and for networking amongst women in marginalised communities, while promoting women in leadership positions within these communities;
Amendment 209 #
2014/2247(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Calls on the Commission to spell out the criteria and conditions serving to define marginalised communities in the EU;
Amendment 210 #
2014/2247(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 b (new)
Paragraph 24 b (new)
24b. Points to the need to implement programmes, projects, and support activities for marginalised communities in order to provide for preschool education, this being a prerequisite for better integration;
Amendment 211 #
2014/2247(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 c (new)
Paragraph 24 c (new)
24c. Points to the need to implement programmes, projects, and support activities for marginalised communities in order first and foremost to underpin the requirement of compulsory formal education while also offering opportunities for other forms of education;
Amendment 212 #
2014/2247(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 d (new)
Paragraph 24 d (new)
24d. Points to the need to implement programmes and support activities for marginalised communities in order to give them access to the media and in that way facilitate their integration;
Amendment 213 #
2014/2247(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 e (new)
Paragraph 24 e (new)
24e. Points to the need to implement programmes and support activities for marginalised communities in order to provide aid, and create the conditions, for micro-scale entrepreneurship, thereby preserving the way of life that marginalised communities have traditionally followed, as well as their traditional way of doing business;
Amendment 214 #
2014/2247(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 f (new)
Paragraph 24 f (new)
24f. Calls on the Commission not only to exploit the possibilities of EU cohesion policy, but also to draw up a clearly defined specific new programme in the forthcoming programming period, based on the EU’s community-oriented programming approach, with a view to helping marginalised communities in the EU and resolving the problems that they face;
Amendment 147 #
2014/2246(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Emphasizes that the Europe 2020 Strategy should take into account the macro-regional targets given that many development projects involve cross-border areas, thus including several regions and states, and taking into account the three EU macro-regional strategies already adopted and others whose preparation process is ongoing;
Amendment 4 #
2014/2245(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines the fact that the economic crisis has seriously and for a long term damaged economic, social and territorial cohesion, cresulating inadditional huge differences between Member States; recalls that since the onset of the crisis over 3.8 million jobs have been lost in manufacturing in the EU1 ; __________________ 1 Industrial Scoreboard 2013, Commission Staff Working Document, p.6.
Amendment 31 #
2014/2245(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Urges the Commission to recognise the full potential of culture in contributing to economic development and in improving social cohesion; stresses, in particular, the role of Cultural and Creative Industries (CCIs) and the digitisation of cultural heritage as drivers for regional development, and highlights the importance of cohesion policy instruments in improving and increasing the number of jobs created directly in the cultural and creative sectors and indirectly in other sectors;
Amendment 39 #
2014/2245(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that culture and tangible and intangible cultural heritage are key elements for the attractiveness of cities and regions and for economic development through cultural tourism; calls on the EU’s cities and regions to use the cohesion policy instruments efficiently in order to boost cultural and socioeconomic development that draws on the cultural distinctiveness of European countries, regions and cities.
Amendment 67 #
2014/2245(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for more social and coordinated public investments of the Member States, local and regional authorities, without which it will be impossible to reach the target of raising industry’s contribution to GDP to as much as 20 % by 2020; recalls that all investments and projects should enhance environmental protection.
Amendment 131 #
2014/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Emphasises that cohesion policy needs to be conducted within the spirit of properly functioning multi-level governance, combined with an effective set-up for responding to the requests of the public and businesses, and with transparent and innovative public procurement, all of which is crucial to enhancing the policy’s impact; stresses, in this regard, that, notwithstanding the importance of decisions taken at EU and Member State levels, local and regional authorities often have primary administrative responsibility for public investment, are more familiar with the situation and requirements at local and regional level, and have a greater political interest in carrying out projects to meet citizens’ needs, and that cohesion policy is a vital tool enabling these authorities to play a key role in the EU; stresses that this level of responsibility should be taken into consideration, in keeping with the partnership principle;
Amendment 137 #
2014/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls on the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy to act without delay, through specific bodies, expressly with a view to remedying shortcomings in national regional policy implementation systems and improving the work of national managing agencies in order to increase the uptake of earmarked cohesion policy resources;
Amendment 144 #
2014/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Calls on the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy to analyse the execution and performance of national systems for EU regional policy, correlating them with various assumptions (structure, OP system, ratio of national OPs to regional-level OPs, role and responsibilities of ministries in the EU regional policy implementation procedure, subsidiarity, role of national, regional, and local authorities in implementing EU regional policy, handling of national contributions to project financing, degree of decentralisation, etc.); believes that the purpose of the above should be to determine priorities regarding the shortcomings occurring in given national systems; considers that, to some extent, the fact that Member States have different regional policy systems determines the quality of execution and the achievement of results;
Amendment 168 #
2014/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Believes, as regards the long term, that cohesion policy has to allow for disparities in levels of development, social and economic assumptions, conditions, resources, comparative advantages, and development opportunities, as well as for differing development needs in individual Member States, when it comes to shaping the cohesion policy to be pursued after 2020; considers that such an approach would create the preconditions for a high standard of implementation in individual Member States and for the attainment of objectives at EU level;
Amendment 6 #
2014/2242(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that sustainable urban mobility is an increasingly important topic in cohesion policy, being a key element and facilitator for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth: considers that the ESIF funds, and especially the ERDF, should contribute to the financing, through the operational programmes, of the Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) for cities and regions and in the EU, by supporting clean and innovative forms of urban transport that will promote multimodality and mobility in a broader territorial context including transborder mobility;
Amendment 69 #
2014/2242(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that the Juncker Plan can play a key role in financing sustainable urban transport projects; believes, therefore, that it is essential to establish strong strategic planning and coherence between urban mobility projects to be supported by the European Fund for Strategic Investment and the objectives and priorities related to urban mobility already developed by national, regional, local and European authorities.
Amendment 373 #
2014/2242(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Invites the Member States and local authorities to rethink speed management in cities and to introduce a default speed limit of 30 km/h by 2020and the development and design of safer road infrastructure;
Amendment 379 #
2014/2242(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Invites the Member States and local authorities to rethink speed management in cities and to introduce a default speed limit of 30 km/h by 2020, except for city roads (ex. ring roads) which have two or more lanes;
Amendment 4 #
2014/2241(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the important role European cultural tourism plays in furthering personal development and knowledge and in promoting and teaching about Europe's rich cultural diversity and strengthening European identity;
Amendment 5 #
2014/2241(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges the importance of the tourism sector for the EU and its internal market, and stresses its potential as a driver of socio-economic growth and job creation, especially in tackling youth unemployment;
Amendment 16 #
2014/2241(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that the EU should be ready to tap the potential of third countries with a large population and an emerging middle class, particularly the BRIC countries, where the number of outbound tourists is rising; points out the need for initiatives aimed at promoting tourism and for more flexibility and consistency in tourist visa arrangements;
Amendment 30 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the actions set out by the 2010 Communication foster the ambitious objective of maintaining Europe’s dominant position as a tourist destination in the world; whereas promoting Europe with its own tourism destination promotion and brand strategy serves as an important tool for strengthening Europe’s image and profile worldwide which helps to accept European standards and values;
Amendment 48 #
2014/2241(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that Europe's cultural heritage makes it one of the most popular tourist destinations in the world and that cultural tourism, which is of key importance in boosting growth and employment, accounts for 40 % of European tourism; emphasises that, in order to maintain current tourist volumes and attract new tourists, Europe's cultural and natural heritage needs to be conserved and showcased and the right balance needs to be struck between expanding the tourism sector and protecting cultural heritage;
Amendment 52 #
2014/2241(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the need to have a more coordinated approach among Member States in tourism-related policy areas, such as innovation, transport, taxation, service quality and the visa regime, while respecting the principle of subsidiarity and close cooperation with regional and local authorities;
Amendment 58 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that further effort is needed to develop an integrated approach to tourism, ensuring that the interests and needs of the sector are taken into account when formulating and implementing other EU policies (e.g. transport, rural policy);
Amendment 73 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Reminds the Commission that tourism is a key sector of the European economy, and it is therefore necessary to institutionalise the coordination between Member States, regional and local authorities and financial institutions and create synergy between the public and private tourism sectors through the creation of a European Tourist Board;
Amendment 86 #
2014/2241(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Points out that because of the importance of the tourism sector the European Union should set up a European Tourism Board as a coordinating body for all activities of European tourism;
Amendment 86 #
2014/2241(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Asks the Commission to bolster existing European measures and programmes, especially cross-border ones, relating to cultural tourism and cultural heritage that have proved effective, to look into the feasibility of introducing a 'European cultural card' which would offer reduced entrance fees for museums, monuments, archaeological sites, libraries, theatres and so on, and to provide targeted financial support under EU instruments including the Structural Funds.
Amendment 89 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls in particular for the creation of a ‘Brand Destination Europe’ with the aim of complementing and enhancing the promotional activities of Member States, national tourism organisations and the European tourism industry for the benefit of the visibility and competitiveness of European tourism destinations at national, regional and local level;
Amendment 102 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recognises, however, that a clear definition and the potential of a Brand Destination Europe has to be further developed; recommends the setting up of a Brand manual, which should specify agreed promotion modalities; calls on the Member States, local and regional authorities to cooperate constructively in order to achieve this objective;
Amendment 110 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Encourages the use of the UNESCO World Heritage List as a unique sales proposal when promoting Europe as a tourist destination (Europe has the largest concentration of heritage objects, in particular cultural, protected by UNESCO);
Amendment 115 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Takes the view that public and private stakeholders should strengthen their efforts to develop new transnational European products, while taking full account of macro regional strategies;
Amendment 124 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Public and private stakeholders of the Baltic, Danube, Adriatic-Ionian and Alpine macro-regional strategy of the European Union are called upon to devise, each in their own area, a joint strategy for the development of tourism;
Amendment 125 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Encourages international cooperation in the creation of transnational thematic itineraries (at the level of a larger number of European countries) in order to amplify experiential elements that motivate visits to certain destinations (defined at the state level), increase the mobility of holidaymakers, achieve higher average spending and broaden the promotional platform (in particular as regards visitors from ‘long haul’ outbound markets);
Amendment 139 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Believes furthermore that there should be a balanced focus on both targeted tourist products which offer a specific tourism experience are more promising in helping to overcome seasonality in Europe thand tourism products targeting specific age groups (e.g. seniors and young people) in helping to overcome seasonality in Europe; calls on the Commission, therefore, to review the objectives for action under the COSME programme;
Amendment 163 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. TAscertains the difference in standards of service quality in tourism and takes the view that quality standards are important as a means of levelling the playing field for operators and increasing transparency for the consumer; calls on all stakeholders to take further the discussion of how the EU can promote quality standards of services in tourism;
Amendment 171 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Encourages the creation of pan- European thematic and quality / excellence labels in the field of tourism services (starting from the level of accommodation facilities, via providers of other services in tourism up to the level of programmes / itineraries / experiences);
Amendment 199 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to continue promoting sustainable tourism in cooperation with the ETC by establishing a European network, developing new specific products, new forms of tourism and setting up a Europe- wide web platform that brings together information on products and destinations in one database with access through the Visiteurope.com portal;
Amendment 222 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Emphasises that natural and cultural heritage and biodiversity protection are a precious capital for the tourism sector, and therefore supports the Member States and the regional authorities and tourism businesses in promoting eco- tourism and respecting EU environmental legislation when deciding on and executing infrastructure projects;
Amendment 237 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Considers that sensitive regions such as islands, coasts and, mountains and remote areas often depend strongly on tourism business and are the first affected by climate change; is therefore convinced that climate protection should be more strongly integrated into European, national and regional tourism and transport policies;
Amendment 294 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Underlines that the reaction to the rise of the ‘sharing economy’ needs to be measurbalanced and appropriate, in particular on the part of public authorities in the area of tax and regulationflexible, in order to support both regulatory framework that secures the level playing field, as well as business environment that supports SMEs and innovation in the industry;
Amendment 311 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Calls on the Commission to undertake a research study measuring the economic and social impact of the sharing economy and its implications for the tourism industry, consumers, technology companies and public authorities; calls on the Commission to inform Parliament accordingly;
Amendment 342 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Urges the Member States to consider the development ofencourage access to high-speed broadband as a priority for remote and mountainous areas;
Amendment 348 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Urges the Member States to consider the development of access to high-speed broadband a priority for remote and mountainous areasural, remote, mountainous areas and other least favoured regions in order to enhance the growth of tourism businesses and to reduce the digital divide in the EU;
Amendment 349 #
2014/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34a. Encourages timely data publication and standardisation of reporting in the field of outbound and inbound tourism traffic in European countries;
Amendment 2 #
2014/2240(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes the Commission Communication which seeks to fully exploit the employment potential of European coasts, seas and oceans through innovation – a key element in sectors such as shipbuilding, tourism, aquaculture, port infrastructure and fisheries;
Amendment 15 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the development of the blue economy needs firmly embedded scientific knowledge, this being the starting point for research and innovation, and whereas the scientific and technological fields related to the blue economy are widely diverse;
Amendment 45 #
2014/2240(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 45 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the EU has been producing a set of programmes and guidelines providing a framework for blue economy-related activities and innovation; whereas that framework should be judged according to its practical usefulness in supporting Member States’ effortthe efforts of Member States and regional and local authorities to develop the blue economy;
Amendment 65 #
2014/2240(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the importance of social dialogue and considers that all parties involved in the blue economy should be represented in that dialogue, together with the individuals or companies concerned and civil society, including workers, so that the latter are actively involved in the framing of policies and solutions at local and regional level;
Amendment 184 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Points to the strategic importance of shipbuilding and ship-repairing and their links to other sectors – including merchant shipping, fisheries, and cruise tourism; considers that a commitment to technological innovation and a high degree of specialisation, which could lead to gains in added value, could create contexts less exposed to international competition and might help to reverse the downturn that the sector has been undergoing; maintains that specific support should be provided to revitalise and modernise the European shipbuilding industry in its different forms;
Amendment 189 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls on the Commission to fully reexamine its policy towards the European shipbuilding industry and strongly endorses special aid intended for the restart and modernisation of shipbuilding in Europe;
Amendment 208 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Considers that prospection and mining on the continental shelf require uninterrupted State involvement of the state, local and regional coastal authorities, especially as regards information, environmental impact assessment, analysing and minimising risks, and the exercise of sovereignty; points to the potential offered by these activities for embedding scientific knowledge and development and technology transfer; points to the challenges entailed in extracting minerals dissolved in sea water;
Amendment 6 #
2014/2239(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas at least 600 million people do not have sustainable access to safe drinking water, and a third of the world population lacks basic sanitation; whereas, as a result, diseases spread, causing suffering and death and posing major impediments to development and safety; whereas about 2 000 children under five years old die daily from diarrhoea, and a majority of these deaths are linked to inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene; whereas there is, however, a clear downward trend in these numbers;
Amendment 78 #
2014/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission and, the Member States, and regional and local authorities to address the lack of available data on water poverty issues, including issues of access and affordability;
Amendment 91 #
2014/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission and, the Member States, and regional and local authorities to support public water companies in the EU which lack the necessary capital to access available EU funding and long-term loans at a preferential interest rate, especially for the purpose of extending water and sanitation services to the poor;
Amendment 174 #
2014/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Urges the Member States, as well as regional and local authorities, to enact policies such as the establishment of water solidarity funds to support people who are unable to afford access to water and sanitation services;
Amendment 33 #
2014/2238(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Asks the Commission, the Member States and regional and local authorities to systematically include a gender equality perspective in the definition, implementation and monitoring of green job creation policies at all levels; asks the Member States and the regional and local authorities to make further efforts to enable women to participate fully in policy formulation, decision-making and the implementation of a green employment strategy that includes green skills;
Amendment 41 #
2014/2238(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission, the Member States and the Commissionregional and local authorities to promote women’s entrepreneurship in the green economy, access to microfinance for women, the creation of green jobs in public services, and the introduction of gender-related quality criteria for companies in the context of public procurement.
Amendment 104 #
2014/2238(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Member States and on regional governments and local authorities to involve social partners and training providers, and to adopt and implement skill development strategies with the objectives of improving generic, sectoral and occupation-specific skills;
Amendment 112 #
2014/2238(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on Member States and regional and local authorities to integrate sustainable development, and environmental competences and skills, into training and education systems; recalls the importance of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) skills;
Amendment 121 #
2014/2238(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses the need for targeted action by public authorities and services to bridge the skills gap; calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to train staff in employment authorities and services to mainstream skills for green employment across labour market policies;
Amendment 135 #
2014/2238(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses the need for consistent policies that promote renewable energy production and energy efficiency with a view to triggering local and regional development and creating localnew jobs;
Amendment 162 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses the importance of partnerships between universities, businesses and authorities with a view to estimating labour needs for the future, as well as fostering cooperation between Member States and regional and local authorities in this regard;
Amendment 220 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses the need for adequate financing and take-up, by the Member States, regional and local authorities and individual employers, of traineeship and apprenticeship schemes;
Amendment 255 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses the need to exchange best practices between Member States and regional and local authorities, in particular in relation to dual learning and vocational education and training, while acknowledging the specificities of each labour market and education system;
Amendment 325 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Calls on the Commission and, the Member States and regional and local authorities to consider innovative ways to encourage investment in the EU in order to boost growth and jobs;
Amendment 337 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to learn from best practices that deliver lower unemployment rates and undertake reforms which draw on those practices;
Amendment 357 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
35. Calls on the Commission and, the Member States and regional and local authorities to provide financial and economic structures that support participation in continuous education and training in order to secure a high skilled future workforce;
Amendment 38 #
2014/2234(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls the best performing Member States to share their experience with the worst performing Member States;
Amendment 9 #
2014/2231(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas a large number of EU Member States have undergonesuccessfully completed a process of democratic transformation of society since the end of the Cold War and have accumulated extensive experience in this field that is relevant to the activities of the EED;
Amendment 22 #
2014/2231(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the establishment of the EED should be seen as a sign of a new trend in EU neighbourhood policy that shifts the paradigm from a traditional state-centred approach to a more balanced and long-term oriented, society-centred perspective, with a focus on direct engagement with local and regional grassroots movements;
Amendment 179 #
2014/2230(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Emphasises the potential of Afghanistan’s resources, which are estimated to have a value of USD 900 billion; encourages the EU to assist the government to realise this potential in a waycalls on the Afghan Government and the EU, building on cooperation among experts, to establish a development programme for Afghanistan that will in the first instance benefits the Afghan people rather than safeguardsing the profits of multinational enterprises;
Amendment 296 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Is convinced that cultural and academic cooperation is essential in combating terrorism and any form of radicalism; stresses the utmost importance of promoting cultural and academic exchanges; urges partner countries to participate in EU cultural programmes; calls on the Commission to act on the European Parliament’s proposal for the creation of an ambitious Euro- Mediterranean Erasmus programme distinct from the Erasmus+ programme;
Amendment 306 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the need to develop an effective common European response by all Member States to jihadist propaganda; underlines the need to send a positive message accompanied by specific examples regarding relations between the European Union and the MENA countries and cooperation between them; stresses the need to ensure much greater visibility for EU initiatives in the region than is now the case;
Amendment 9 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Demands that the main outcome of the negotiations be an ambitious and comprehensive agreement, bringing a significant market opening and an unrestricted access for EU companies, including SMEs;
Amendment 11 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the consequences of the Russian embargo have clearly demonstrated the continuous geopolitical relevance of agriculture, the importance of having access to a range of different agricultural markets and the need for strong and strategic trade partnerships with reliable trade partners;
Amendment 16 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the TTIP is an opportunity to ease reciprocal regulatory burdens that unnecessarily hamper trade, by providing more and transparent information such as which information should be on a label, clarify administrative and custom procedures and align and simplify regulatory regimes where feasible;
Amendment 19 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point a
Paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ensure, via a general clause in the agreement, in full compliance with the GATS and the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, that the parties to the agreement reserve the right to adopt or maintain any measure (in particular of a regulatory and/or financial nature) with respect to the protection or promotion of multicultural and, linguistic, and other forms of diversity, media pluralism and media freedom, and to preserve or develop, in accordance with the principle of technological neutrality, a regime for audiovisual services in line with democratic, social and cultural requirements;
Amendment 29 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Is convinced, however, that TTIP should not only cut down barriers but also aim at promoting European high levels of consumer protection of consumers rights; observes that in most sectors EU and US standards and regulatory environments ensure this high level; considers, therefore, that approximating our regulations represents a unique chance to establish high-quality standards and laws for the protection of consumers rights which will be the de facto international standards;
Amendment 31 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas TTIP is an opportunity to set high standards globally and supplement standards from both continents, especially at times when new economic actors are gaining scale, who do not share the EU or the US commitment to rule based trade, high levels of consumer protection, environmental standards and animal welfare;
Amendment 33 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas the almost ratified CETA agreement has already shown the opportunities for trade in agricultural sensitive areas such as beef that adheres strictly to European SPS standards1 a; __________________ 1a http://www.globalmeatnews.com/Industry- Markets/Canada-to-develop-hormone- free-beef-for-EU
Amendment 33 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point b
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) reafconfirm that services with a strong cultural component will not, under any circumstances, be challenged by the TTIP agreement;
Amendment 42 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point c
Paragraph 1 – point c
(c) clarifyonfirm that the fixed book price system will not be challenged by the obligations under the TTIP agreement;
Amendment 48 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Deplores the severe restrictions in the US air transport sector regarding foreign ownership and control of airlines; deplores, furthermore, the imbalance between the restrictions on cabotage rights imposed by the US and the freedoms enjoyed by US airlines in Member States; questions seriouslycannot accept, in this respect, the validity of the reasoning by the US to maintain these restrictions based on national security considerations;
Amendment 52 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point d
Paragraph 1 – point d
(d) ensure with a general clause the right to adopt or maintain any measure with regard to the provision of all educational and cultural services which receive public funding or state support in any form and ensure that privately funded foreign providers meet the same quality and accreditation requirements as domestic providers;
Amendment 54 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that US maritime cabotage laws are regulated by the Jones Act (Merchant Marine Act of 1920) and that under this act US vessels are: (i) restricted from having repair and conversion services carried out outside the US; and (ii) subject to declaration, entry and payment of a 50 % import duty upon return to the US, if sent to a foreign shipyard for repair work or the installation of certain equipment; emphasises that no US-built requirements exist for any other modes of transportation in the US and that this results in the effective exclusion of the EU shipbuilding industry, including ship repair and maintenance, from selling vessels for use in American waters; notes that the EU does not exclude maritime manufacturers from the US or any other third countries; calls upon the Commission to address, due to the strategic importance of the European shipyard companies, to insist on reciprocity in the TTIP because of this extreme protectionism by the US;
Amendment 122 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
ba. recalls that the TTIP negotiations cannot in themselves change the implementation or proposal of legislation in any area, including European food safety, SPS standards, animal welfare and environmental measures;
Amendment 160 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point d
Paragraph 1 – point d
d. secure a level playing field, treating as sensitive those products for which direct competition would expose EU agricultural producers to excessive pressure, for example in cases where regulatory conditions and related costs of production, such as animal housing requirements, in the EU diverge from those in the US;
Amendment 299 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Calls on the Commission to insists, within the TTIP negotiations, on the inclusion of European standards and practices in the key areas for the protection of health and the environment, food safety and consumer information, considering unacceptable the potential decrease of the achieved European standards;
Amendment 155 #
2014/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. invites the Commission to highlight and presents examples of good practices of forest management with regard to the impact on economic and social development of rural areas and good practices and examples of international associating that aims to transfer experiences on good practices.
Amendment 9 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Points to the dramatically aggravated security environment around the EU, where the international law-based order and stability and security of Europe are challenged to a degree unprecedented since the beginning of European integrationperiod since the late 1990s when the ESDP/CSDP was established; points to the ongoing transformation of the global political order;
Amendment 20 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 1
Paragraph 3 – indent 1
– safeguarding peace and stability by speaking with one voice and taking solidarity actions in protecting European values and enforcing the political and legal order in Europe, thereby safeguarding peace and stability,
Amendment 34 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 2
Paragraph 3 – indent 2
– improving the EU’s contribution to its territorial defence,
Amendment 44 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 3
Paragraph 3 – indent 3
– supporting security, stabilisation and the rule of law in the EU’s eastern and southern neighbourhood,
Amendment 46 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 – indent 3 a (new)
- taking a main role in the resolution of conflicts in Europe and in areas of its strategic interest,
Amendment 54 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 4
Paragraph 3 – indent 4
– strengthening, together with partners, the rules-based, democratic and pluralistic global political and economic order, including the protection of human rights, and
Amendment 67 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that an ambitious and effective EU foreign policy needs to be based on acommon European values and shared vision of key European interests, values and objectives in external relations and on a common perception of the threats affecting the EU as a whole; welcomes the commitment of the HR/VP, on the basis of the mandate from the European Council of December 2013, to initiate as a matter of priority a process of strategic reflection on the EU’s foreign and security policy, which should involve a wide range of stakeholders, including Member States, European institutions and the European public; insists that this reflection should lead to a new European Security Strategy in order to respond to the new threats and challenges;
Amendment 75 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines the need for a common strategy to face significant new security threats, with the predominant one being terrorism inside and outside the EU; emphasises the need to intertwine internal and external security of EU as well as closer cooperation and coordination of the responsible authorities; calls for strengthening and deepening the cooperation among EU members on intelligence data exchange;
Amendment 104 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Encourages the EU institutions and the Member States to fully use the toolbox of the Lisbon Treaty to move from what has so far been a mostly reactive approach to a pro-active, coherent EU foreign and security policy, based on common values and deployed in the shared European interest;
Amendment 209 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for a reform of the EU’s approach torenewed and coherent EU migration policy; insists on the need to address the root causes of irregular migration, using all policy and assistance instruments provided by all member states which will share human and material means, including development and trade policies, humanitarian aid, conflict prevention and crisis management; reiterates its call to step up humanitarian support to countries which host refugees and to strengthen Regional Protection Programmes, run in collaboration with UNHCR close to regions of origin; stresses that migration management should be a high priority in EU cooperation with neighbours in the east and south;
Amendment 254 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3
Subheading 3
Preserving and strengthening the European political and legal order, in the Eastern Neighbourhood in particular
Amendment 295 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Welcomes the results of the parliamentary elections held in Ukraine and Moldova in October and December 2014 respectively, and urges the Governments of Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine to progress with reforms relating to political and economic governance and the rule of law; calls on the HR/VP to use all available political, security and economic tools to provide comprehensive support to the Ukrainian, Georgian and Moldovan Governments on this path;
Amendment 336 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Insists on the need to substantially revise the EU´s policy towards its southern neighbourhood, and to develop a comprehensive strategy focusing the EU’s instruments and scarce budgetary resources on support for the building of functioning and inclusive states capable of delivering security for their citizens, confronting religious extremism and, enhancing the rule of law and respecting human rights, which is a key precondition for investment and economic development; points to the unused potential of cross- border trade within the region; insists on close cooperation on managing migration flows, while respecting human rights;
Amendment 348 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Takes the view that additional EU support should be granted to partner governments which are committed to and make tangible progress towards democratisation, such as Tunisia, Jordan and Morocco, provided that the protection of human rights is ensured and the rules of international law are respected;
Amendment 11 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the macro-regional strategies represent an innovative element of voluntary cooperation among Member States and neighbouring countries in addressing common challenges;
Amendment 15 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas there are large socio- economic differences between the countries involved in this strategy, especially between EU Member States and non-Member States;
Amendment 18 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the macro-regional strategies may be seen as a tool of European integration and increased territorial cohesion;
Amendment 29 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the efforts undertaken by all interested stakeholders in setting up an institutional architecture for the implementation of the EUSAIR; encourages all national, regional and local stakeholders to take full ownership of the implementation of the projects covered by this macro-regional strategy; stresses the importance of securing in each participating country, sufficient and competent administrative resources expressly dedicated to implementing the EUSAIR;
Amendment 37 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Warns that, due to the steep fall in private investments across the countries in the Region coupled with fiscal consolidation and limited investment capacity in the public sector, problems may arise in financing projects under the Strategy; calls on the participating countries to maintain a high degree of political ownership, commitment and leadership necessary to successfully carry out the Strategy;
Amendment 44 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the fact that the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) and the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance for 2014-2020, and in particular the Adriatic-Ionian Cooperation Programme 2014-2020 (ADRION), provide significant potential resources and a wide range of tools and technical options for the strategy; supports the fact that other funds and instruments relevant to the strategy pillars are available, in particular Horizon 2020 and Erasmus Plus programmes in respect of all pillars, the Connecting Europe Facility in respect of Pillar II, the LIFE programme in respect of Pillar III, as well as in respect of climate change mitigation and adaptation, and the COSME and Creative Europe programmes for SMEs in respect of Pillar IV;
Amendment 46 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the European Commission, national, regional and local bodies which are responsible for preparation, managing and implementation of ESIF programmes to stress the importance of macro-regional projects and actions;
Amendment 66 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers it necessary to find ways to involve countries not included in the strategy and which are geographically and economically close to the region, at least on an individual project basis/priority basis;
Amendment 67 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Urges stakeholders from the Region to exchange best practices, discover the bottlenecks in the implementation of the EU macro-regional strategies and to increase cooperation with their counterparts from other macro-regions, such as those from the Baltic Sea, Danube Basin and from the (future) Alpine region;
Amendment 72 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Warns that there is the need to include the local and regional authorities in the political managing bodies and in the operational, technical and implementing bodies of the Strategy;
Amendment 77 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Refers to precedents established in the context of other EU macro-regional strategies and calls to support, within the framework of pilot projects and preparatory actions, different types of actions ranging from studies to seed money for preparation of projects under different priority areas;
Amendment 85 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Considers necessary to find ways to involve, for the participating countries, other important pillars that could create development benefits for the area such as agriculture because of exceptional geo- climatic conditions, bio-diversity and potential to create synergic coordinated effects and further growth;
Amendment 87 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Draws attention to the importance of adequate reporting and evaluation of the implementation of the Strategy; calls, in this context, on the participating countries together with the Commission to gather reliable baseline data and establish concrete targets for each pillar which would be evaluated on a yearly basis and made publicly available;
Amendment 95 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. ERegrets the fact that EUSAIR inadequately addresses issues of growing concerns such as irregular and illegal migration and cross-border crime; emphasises that the region faces serious migration problems in the Mediterranean; stresses that controlling these problems is essential for the further development of the southern part of the region;
Amendment 98 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Expects new impetus to be given to the strengthening of peace and security in South East Europe;
Amendment 102 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Calls on the countries to exchange best practices in the area of respect for minority rights in order to apply the highest standards, considering that this is a particularly sensitive area regarding linguistic issues;
Amendment 105 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Calls on the Commission, as an independent facilitator in this strategy, and as the financier, to do its best to make sure the socio-economic differences between the countries are reduced and not increased;
Amendment 107 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 d (new)
Paragraph 9 d (new)
9d. Calls on the Commission to present a report on the implementation of EUSAIR to Parliament and the Council every year, starting with the implementation year and ending with the final evaluation after the 2020 target;
Amendment 120 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Encourages clustering and cooperation between public and private enterprises, universities, research institutes and other relevant stakeholders in the marine and maritime sectors with the aim of stimulating innovation and benefiting fully from synergies; considers that actions under the Blue Growth pillar should build on the national and regional research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation in order to secure more efficient and effective investments; calls on the countries and regions to participate in the Commission's S3 Platform to benefit from assistance in development, implementation and review of smart specialisation strategies;
Amendment 122 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Supports the creation of a joint quality label for high-quality seafood products from the Region in order to increase their competitiveness;
Amendment 133 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Urges comprehensive research on fish stocks, especially of endangered species, and their biological interconnection, given the fact of not having exact data and a complete, detailed view of the status quo, the lack of which would make the evaluations unclear and unreliable; urges the preservation of natural spawning;
Amendment 141 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines the importance of supporting and fostering recreational sport and family fishing, especially on the islands, in order to preserve the local cultural traditions and maritime lifestyles of islanders and small coastal sites;
Amendment 146 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses the importance of improving transport and energy connectivity among the participating countries as well as between them and their other neighbours, including maritime transport, intermodal connections to the hinterland and energy networks; underlines the lack of connection between the two coasts on the Adriatic and the network infrastructural gap existing in the Adriatic-Ionian area;
Amendment 154 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Underlines the importance of connecting maritime transport routes and ports with other parts of Europe and the relevance of interconnections with TEN-T corridors; calls on the participating countries to focus their efforts on implementing projects that are covered by the current TEN-T network and its proposed indicative extension to the Western Balkans, using existing instrumentsother interventions for its proposed extension able to solve the network gap existing in the Adriatic-Ionian area, e.g.: (i) completing the Baltic-Adriatic corridor from Ravenna to Ancona-Pescara- Termoli-Foggia-Bari-Brindisi, (ii) the North –South extension of the Scandinavian - Mediterranean corridor to the stretch Ancona - Pescara – Termoli – Bari, (iii) with reference to the Mediterranean corridor, a branch to better connect the Iberian peninsula to central Italy and to the Balkans, (iv) building highway connection from Rijeka to Igoumenitsa, (v) implementing road connection in Balkan Area between port system and inside countries, from Rijeka to Zagreb, from Ploče to Sarajevo, from Bar to Belgrade and Kragujevac, from Durres to Prishtine, Skopje and Sofia, (vi) implementing port facilities for better connections between the two coasts on the Adriatic;
Amendment 161 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Draws attention to the need to finalise the Adriatic-Ionian highway as soon as possible, which will give a boost to the economic and social development of the macro-region; recalls the importance of a comprehensive eastern Adriatic-Ionianthe new corridors that integrates highways, railways, gas pipelines and other infrastructures on both sides of the Adriatic-Ionian area;
Amendment 209 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Recalls the richness of the marine, coastal and terrestrial ecosystems of the participating countries; calls for joint efforts in taking all possible measures to preserve the marine environment and the transnational terrestrial habitats as well as to reduce the pollution of the sea and other threats to coastal and marine biodiversity; stresses the importance to protect marine and terrestrial species, such as the Mediterranean monk seals, olms, lynxes, griffon vultures and others;
Amendment 219 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Calls on the countries to develop and implement comprehensive plans to reuse obsolete industrial and military sites; stresses that these sites not only pose a threat to the environment but also hold significant economic potential which is not being exploited;
Amendment 220 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 b (new)
Paragraph 26 b (new)
26b. Calls for encouraging the relocation of industry from urban centres and coastal areas with the aim of improving quality of life;
Amendment 223 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Recognises the difficulties created by various natural disasters that have hit the Region in the last years; draws attention to the problem of deforestation and the related-climate change risks; calls on the participating countries to concentrate their efforts in taking preventive measures that protect the lives and goods of people in the hotspot areas;
Amendment 232 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Calls on the non-EU countries to accelerate the implementation of the sectoral acquis (such as the Water Framework Directive) as an exercise of their future accession to the Union;
Amendment 240 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. Urges to urgently improve the cross- border road connection in order to enhance the competitiveness of tourism given that poor connectivity causes traffic bottlenecks and long delays, such as the connection between Slovenia and Croatia on the stretch Koper-Buje; underlines, for tourist purposes, the necessity to improve the existing air infrastructure and the maritime connection between the two coasts of the Adriatic;
Amendment 251 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Urges the European Commission, the participating countries and the local and regional authorities to take measures that incentivise stakeholders in improving the tourism infrastructure;
Amendment 253 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 b (new)
Paragraph 31 b (new)
31b. Draws attention to the need to enable easier access to support and finance to SMEs which are instrumental for the tourism sector; encourages stakeholders in the Region to participate in the Enterprise Europe Network in order to share experiences, network and find cross-border partners;
Amendment 258 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Supports the development of a diversified tourism offer including thematic tourist parks and routes, and cultural, rural, health, medical, enogastronomic, conference and sport tourism, including cycling, golf, diving, hiking, mountaineering and outdoor sports, in order to prolong the tourist season and to improve the competitiveness of tourist destinations; supports the development of rural tourism in order to reduce the pressure on significant tourism centres and narrow coastal area contributing to overcome seasonality; supports the expansion of tourist activities towards the hinterland;
Amendment 116 #
2014/2213(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Regrets that, although the new cohesion policy has legally binding urban- related aspects, especially regarding involvement of cities in the programming phase, the actual participation of city and urban representatives in the shaping of the policy is weak; calls on the Commission and the Member States to systematically apply the partnership principle when implementing programmes and projects supported by EU funding, with particular attention being given to the involvement of cities and towns in the preparation, management and governance of the programmes;
Amendment 139 #
2014/2213(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls on the Commission to adequately include and integrate aspects of the European Urban Agenda and to stress the urban dimension within existing and future EU macro-regional strategies which represent a model for planning and multi-level governance;
Amendment 19 #
2014/2210(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas family businesses differ in terms of values from non-family corporations as regards long-term orientation, have a special degree of commitment to their local and regional community – rooted in the European tradition of the ‘honourable merchant’ – and are generally slower to close down and put workers out of jobs;
Amendment 56 #
2014/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that, because of their history, family businesses are very rooted in a particular location and thus also create jobs in rural and in less attractive areas; calls on the Commission and, the Member States, and regional and local authorities, therefore, to provide the necessary infrastructure in order to ensure the competitiveness of such businesses;
Amendment 90 #
2014/2210(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
4. Draws the Commission’s attention to the need for equal treatment of big multinationals and family businesses so as to ensure a balanced level playing field in terms of competition, while respecting the unique nature of family businesses, in particular in those Member States in which such businesses were destroyed after 1945in the decades from 1945 until the era of democratic change.
Amendment 54 #
2014/2209(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses the necessity for higher exploitation of youth entrepreneurship' potentials in the context of green growth of SMEs, taking into account situations in which youth unemployment is a big problem for EU countries. In this sense it calls the Commission to prepare measures which would connect educational institutions, European programmes, measures to support green economy and youth;
Amendment 57 #
2014/2209(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Calls on the Commission to prepare measures which would, in the post 2020 period and through regional policy, create specific programmes that would include all elements of green growth for SMEs;
Amendment 91 #
2014/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that there is no one-size-fits-all mode of finance and calls on the Commission to support the development of a broad range of tailored programmes, instruments and initiatives, especially for new business models in the green economy, ranging across equity (such as business angels, crowd funding and multilateral trading facilities), quasi-equity (such as mezzanine finance) and debt instruments (such as small-ticket company bonds, guarantee facilities and platforms), and partnerships between banks and other operators involved in SME financing (accountancy professionals, business or SME associations or chambers of commerce), in order to support businesses in their start-up, growth and transfer phases, taking into account their size, turnover and financing needs; calls on the Member States to provide fiscal incentives for these funding models; calls on the local and regional authorities to ensure adequate incentives; stresses the importance of reviewing existing SME supporting instruments to include further green growth opportunities;
Amendment 109 #
2014/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses the importance of knowledge transfers and multi-stakeholder knowledge sharing, including cross-border, through informal networks, especially for SMEs and micro enterprises, to raise awareness of existing and new innovative techniques, best practices, ways to acquire proper financing, possible national government, regional and local authorities support schemes and the relevant legislative frameworks entailing the least burdensome administration;
Amendment 165 #
2014/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Believes that developing entrepreneurship skills and programmes to learn how the market, the economy and the financial system operate, function and interact, along with environmental awareness, should be included in basic education systems; believes that a well prepared business plan is the first step towards better access to finance and viability; calls on the Commission and the Member States to include financial education in their education programmes without delay; supports in this connection the ‘Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs’ programme, designed to promote an entrepreneurial culture and develop the single market and competitiveness;
Amendment 172 #
2014/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Believes that the principles of environmental awareness, sustainable growth, circular economy, green energy and similar principles should be included in educational systems;
Amendment 162 #
2014/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Commission to set a binding target to increase resource efficiency at EU level by 30 % by 2030 and individual targets for each Member State; calls on regional and local authorities to become actively involved in meeting those targets;
Amendment 27 #
2014/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that reducing poverty is not the primary objective of the private sector, by its very nature, and that that is therefore a task for the public sector; rejects public- private partnerships, blending and the focus on microcredit and blending, since they finance corporate profits, above all, and do not reduce poverty;
Amendment 29 #
2014/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the need for EU trade policy to respect the political and economicy space of developing countries so as to maintain robust import tariffs that facilitate the creation of skilled and decent jobs within local manufacturing and agro-processing industries as possible enablers of higher domestic value-added, industrial growth and diversification, which are a key component in economic and social upgrading;
Amendment 17 #
2014/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the Ebola crisis is systemic at local and regional level and also at national and global governance level;
Amendment 21 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas this epidemic is unpredictable and constantly uncontrollably evolving;
Amendment 39 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas, across the region, there are still no adequate facilities in the locations required for isolating and diagnosing patients; whereas in many places in West Africa, bad coordination is an issue, resulting in serious gaps in the response;
Amendment 46 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas other elements that are essential to an Ebola response – such as awareness- raising and community acceptance, safe burials, contact tracing, alerts and surveillance, access to health care and education for non- Ebola patients – are still lacking in parts of West Africa;
Amendment 51 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that innovativeclear and unambiguous responses are needed that acknowledge the role of women as key actors in protecting their families and communities and in breaking the chains of transmission, including measures to engage women’s organisations in schemes to provide information on the importance of health- care and EVD-related precautions, to train EVD-survivors as nurses, cleaners and laundry workers, as well as to ensure equal protection of all hospital staff;
Amendment 61 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Remains deeply concerned about the heavy toll of EVD on women and girls, and believunderlines that failure to address gender- specific issues will have a negative impact on the prospects for long-term recovery.
Amendment 62 #
2014/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
N. whereas it is essential to set up robust and effective health systems in all developing countries;
Amendment 64 #
2014/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
O. whereas the Ebola crisis has dragged the countries in the area affected deeper into recession;
Amendment 69 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Deplores the loss of lives in the region devastated by the Ebola outbreak and expresses its sincere condolences to the governments of the countries and to the people directly and indirectly affected by the outbreak;
Amendment 97 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission, in coordination with the Member States, to put in place control systems to ensure that the entire budget and other resources allocated to stopping the Ebola outbreak is actually used to fight the epidemic in the countries affected by the virus and not for other purposes;
Amendment 99 #
2014/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the establishment of a permanent European rapid response capability comprising experts, laboratory support staff, epidemiologists and logistics facilities that can be deployed extremely swiftly; draws attention in particular to the contribution the EU can make to screening at land and maritime borders and to the fact that the Union could seek to emulate and benefit from the level of excellence achieved by the US health authorities in screening at airports;
Amendment 106 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that the current crisis cannot be solved by health systems alone, but that a concerted and long term approach involving different sectors (healthcare, education and training, sanitation, food aid, drinking water) is needed to address the critical gaps in all essential services; stresses that education, understood in a comprehensive way (also covering the cultural dimension and beliefs of these countries), and not only in terms of understanding and addressing the current Ebola outbreak, is key;
Amendment 149 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Encourages taking immediate and effective action to coordinate and strengthen medical research and the production of efficient medicines and vaccines against Ebola and to carry out scrupulous infection control;
Amendment 29 #
2014/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas motherhood and care for the elderly represent additional work that is for the most part carried out by women; whereas this work is neither paid nor properly valued by society, even though it contributes to social welfare and can be measured by economic indicators such as GDP; whereas this results in the widening of the income gaps that exist between women and men through the ‘costs’ of the years spent out of the labour market or of reduced hours due to part-time arrangements; whereas the impact of these elements on lifetime earnings varies across the Member States depending on the level of support given to parents, by either legislative measures or collective agreements;
Amendment 86 #
2014/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Points out that access to justice in this field is limited due to several causes, such as the length or costs of the procedures, the absence of free legal aid or the fear of victim stigmatisation in the workplace; underlines the fact that the application of the burden of proof rule also poses problems in several Member States; calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to support equality bodies, trade unions and NGOs in taking an active role in providing assistance to victims of discrimination;
Amendment 96 #
2014/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to assess the existing best practices and to disseminate the results of this assessment as regards the effective measures that Member States and regional and local authorities could take to encourage employers and organisations involved in vocational training to prevent all forms of discrimination on the grounds of sex, in particular as regards harassment and sexual harassment in the workplace, through enhancing access to employment, offering further vocational training and promoting best practices;
Amendment 106 #
2014/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission and, the Member States, and regional and local authorities to encourage social partners to promote the monitoring of equality practices in the workplace, the further scrutiny of collective agreements, applicable pay scales and job classification schemes in order to avoid any direct or indirect discrimination of women; calls on the Member States to strengthen the obligations for large and medium-sized enterprises to ensure the systematic promotion of equal treatment and to provide the appropriate information on a regular basis to their employees, including on issues of equal pay;
Amendment 113 #
2014/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission and, the Member States, and regional and local authorities to strengthen the institutional mechanisms to implement equality between women and men, and to encourage the social partners to measure the equality dimension of collective agreements;
Amendment 115 #
2014/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Commission and, Member States, and regional and local authorities to step up significantly awareness raising measures as regards the rights of the victims of discrimination on the grounds of sex; underlines the need for cooperation by all stakeholders, including social partners and NGOs, to address stereotypes about the work of women and men and how they impact on the value of work and low pay;
Amendment 464 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Notes that a more decentralised energy system, with power sources being placed closer to the point of usage, diminishes the risk of attacking vulnerable infrastructure and simultaneously provides business opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises; calls on the Commission and the Member States, therefore, to facilitate further development of local and regional renewable energy sources and of local and regional distribution networks;
Amendment 656 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
35. Calls for the Projects of Common Interest (PCI) adopted in 2013 to be executed without delay and to immediately consider new projects with the Member States;;
Amendment 776 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
Paragraph 45
45. Calls on the Member States to strengthen the legal capacities of the Energy Community Secretariat in order to ensure swift and efficient implementation of the EU energy acquis in the Energy Community countries; stresses the need to boost the energy security not only of the EU, but of Europe as a whole; highlights that the Western Balkans Countries have an enormous potential in renewable energy sources and calls on their inclusion in the Energy Community and in the common energy market.
Amendment 21 #
2014/2152(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Takes the view that gender equality is a necessary condition for meeting the Europe 2020 strategy’s 75 % employment rate target and is crucial for maintaining sustainable pension, social and health care systems;
Amendment 47 #
2014/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas, owing to traditional structures and tax disincentives, women have had the unacceptable second-earner status imposed on them, in the form of segregation in the labour market, an incomplete employment history and gender-specific wage inequality, and whereas also unpaid care, nursing and domestic work is performed much more frequently by women who thus have less time available to pursue paid work, which in turn results in a much lower pension, which is why the compatibility of work and family life, in particular to achieve the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy, should continue to be supported by practical measures, a process in which men in particular need to become more involved;
Amendment 104 #
2014/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
M. whereas institutional mechanisms form a necessary basis for the achievement of gender equality; whereas also gender equality, as a cross-cutting task should serve as a basis of all policy areas in the EU and, its Member States and regional and local authorities, together with the concepts of gender mainstreaming, gender budgeting and gender impact assessment;
Amendment 132 #
2014/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to make clear the EU role that it wishes to play in the world and in working with the Member States, regional and local authorities with regard to the promotion of gender equality and to pursue these goals both through the concept of gender mainstreaming in all areas and through individual targeted and specific actions;
Amendment 183 #
2014/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to enshrine ‘zero tolerance’ campaigns in the strategy and to push forward the debate in the Member States, regional and local authorities about the origins of violence and abuse and the reasons why women resort to prostitution and emphasises the importance of including men more specifically in the fight against violence against women;
Amendment 206 #
2014/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to assist Member States, regional and local authorities in drawing up their action programmes for gender equality and to pay special attention to new forms of violence against women, such as cyber-harassment and cyber-stalking, and to carry out continual evaluations; stresses in this connection also the importance of close cooperation with civil society in order to recognise problem areas at an earlier stage and to address them more effectively;
Amendment 259 #
2014/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission to support Member States, regional and local authorities in creating incentives for employers to convert unofficial work into official employment;
Amendment 286 #
2014/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to create incentives for Member States, regional and local authorities to obtain a more balanced representation of women and men in parliaments and in the Commissionthe Commission, national parliaments, representational bodies of regional and local authorities and emphasises in this connection the importance of electoral lists alternating by gender and of proposing both a woman and a man candidate for senior EU positions;
Amendment 360 #
2014/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on the Commission to create incentives for competent training in the critical use of the media in the Member States, regional and local authorities to encourage the questioning of stereotypes and structures and to share best practice examples so as to review the ways in which roles have been stereotyped in the educational material used so far; calls on the Commission, in this connection, to support programmes to raise awareness of stereotypes and traditional gender roles in the education and media sector; emphasises in this connection the importance of gender-equitable teaching methods for teachers, so that they can clearly explain the benefits of gender equality and a diverse society;
Amendment 437 #
2014/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Calls on the Commission to promote the use of gender mainstreaming, gender budgeting and gender impact assessment in all areas, both at EU and at nation at EU, national, regional and local level and thus ensure specific gender equality targets;
Amendment 442 #
2014/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Calls on the Commission also to encourage cooperation between Member States, regional and local authorities women's NGOs and the social partners;
Amendment 33 #
2014/2151(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Highlights the vital role public authorities play on all levels, including local, regional and national, through procurement and purchasing, and commends the Commission’s desire to develop, promote and publish a guide on best practices to avoid public authorities on all levels purchasing counterfeit goods;
Amendment 47 #
2014/2150(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that improving regulations and investments in environmental protection creates opportunities for businesses, especially for SMEs in the context of the transition towards a green economy;
Amendment 68 #
2014/2150(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. ExpectsCalls on the Commission to carry out a structured consultation, including with the European Parliament, prior to the announcement of any withdrawal of a Commission proposal;
Amendment 195 #
2014/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Considers that the Committee of the Regions should be involved, as an advisory body, in the ex-post evaluation of new legislation;
Amendment 3 #
2014/2149(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that Europe is one of the world’s majorin cultural tourism destinations thanks to its rich cultural and natural heritage, and that cultural tourism accounts for about 40 % of European tourism;
Amendment 21 #
2014/2149(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that cultural and natural heritage constitutes a powerful driving force for inclusive local, regional, urban and rural development and contributes to the enhancement of sustainable cultural tourism, while reducing the impact of seasonality;
Amendment 29 #
2014/2149(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the potential for boosting cultural tourism in rural and island regions which offer intact nature and landscapes, traditional culture (folk artoriginal folk art and customs, handcrafts, local festivals, gastronomic, wine and other traditions), local products and authenticity; stresses, in this regard, the importance of intermodal connectivity as a means of enhancing the appeal and accessibility of smaller and remote tourist destinations;
Amendment 42 #
2014/2149(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission, in view of the economic importance of cultural heritage and the links between cultural heritage and tourism, and following the model of the status of the EU Culture programme (2007-2013 under the European Structural and Cohesion Funds (ESCF), to prepare the conditions for a more straightforward and accessible approach to the funding of such projects under regional development policy after 2020;
Amendment 62 #
2014/2149(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Emphasises, furthermore, the importance of developing interregional and cross- border cultural and tourist products, which are based on coordinated action, building on synergies, saveing resources, and strengthening and promoting the common cultural identity and the competitiveness of the entire region;
Amendment 107 #
2014/2149(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Emphasises the significant potential for the development of entrepreneurial activity in the tourism sector, in particular of tourism SMEs, which contribute to the preservation, protection and promotion of Europe’s cultural heritage; stresses that the education system and a high level of expertise are preconditions and that quality of service and high-level professional skills are key factors for the success and competitiveness of the European tourism sector;
Amendment 123 #
2014/2149(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on the Commission to strongly incorporate tourism into a funding programme through a new European fund for strategic investment in order to enhance the competitiveness of European tourism and rapidly resolve the problem of unemployment, particularly among young people, in Mediterranean Member States;
Amendment 59 #
2014/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses the importance of MEDIA in testing innovative approaches in audience development, in particular through supporting festivals and other film events;
Amendment 72 #
2014/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls the Member States to introduce and increase the incentives for the film production;
Amendment 86 #
2014/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Member States to redoublstrongly reinforce their efforts to improve media literacy, and in particular film literacy, in school curricula, and to develop initiatives at national, regional or local level in formal and informal education and training;
Amendment 19 #
2014/2147(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Is worried that, according to the 2012 evaluation reports sent by BE, CY, CZ, DK, DE, ES, FR, HU, IT, NL, AT, PT and UK, operational programmes appear to be contributing little or nothing to the following objectives: optimising production costs, stabilising producer prices and improving the attractiveness of POs, and that little or no contribution is being made to some environmental objectives such as landscape preservation, climate change mitigation, preserving air, water, and soil quality and reducing waste production;
Amendment 22 #
2014/2147(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Deplores the following weaknesses identified in the setting-up of national strategies: too large a number of objectives, lack of precise predefined targets for the different objectives, and very low use of crisis prevention and management instruments in connection mainly with harvest insurance, promotion and communication and product withdrawal, and the lack of local and regional authority involvement;
Amendment 70 #
2014/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital Q
Recital Q
Q. whereas the Commission’s report identifies complexity of rules and lack of legal certainty as weaknesses of the current F&V regime; whereas Commissioner Hogan has committed himself to simplifying the regime in the first year of his term, taking into account cultural differences and contrasts in market realities between different Member States and the need to boost competitiveness and the innovative strength of the sector;
Amendment 72 #
2014/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital Ra (new)
Recital Ra (new)
R a. whereas clear and predictable audit procedures are essential for the functioning of the F&V regime; whereas overlap in consecutive audits should be avoided and that follow-up audits should not be carried out before clearance of accounts has given a definite decision on a previous audit, in order to prevent that Member states are confronted with larger corrections than would have been necessary;
Amendment 74 #
2014/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital Rb (new)
Recital Rb (new)
R b. whereas proportionality should be an essential part in reducing legal uncertainty within the F&V regime, ensuring that a PO should not be prejudiced as a whole based on infringements of single offenders;
Amendment 117 #
2014/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses in this context that it is important to further encourage producers to organize themselves and to increase the overall level of support to POs and to provide stronger incentives both for the merging of existing POs and the creation of new ones; in this sense it is important to address cultural differences and the contrast in market realities between Member states which desires different approaches;
Amendment 170 #
2014/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Considers that associations of producer organisations (AOPOs) could play an important role in increasing the bargaining power of farmers and urges the Commission to reinforce incentives for setting up APOs and envisage a greater role for them in the future; urges that legislation for transnational APOs should be clarified taking into account the burden of responsibility accounted to the Member States in which the transnational APOs are situated;
Amendment 203 #
2014/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Emphasises that, through their operational programmes, POs can make important contributions to achieving environmental goals and improving food safety standards; asks the Commission to consider how these effects can be maximised, for example through the strengthening of integrated pest management and provide more flexibility for producers in achieving environmental goals;
Amendment 209 #
2014/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Urges the Commission to establish guidelines or policy rules clarifying the conditions under which POs can be temporarily granted a derogation from Article 101 (1) TFEU based on Article 2221a which provides POs the opportunity to take measures in order to stabilize the sector during periods of severe imbalanced markets; ––––––––––––––––––––– 1a Regulation 1308/2013
Amendment 37 #
2014/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Regulation (EC) No 726/2004
Article 86
Article 86
At least every tenfive years, the Commission shall publish a general report on the experience acquired as a result of the operation of the procedures laid down in this Regulation and in Chapter 4 of Title III of Directive 2001/83/EC.’;
Amendment 44 #
2014/0255(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) Medicated feed should be marketed in specially labelled sealed containers for safety reasons and to protect the user’s interest.
Amendment 71 #
2014/0255(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) A system for the collection of unused or expired products should be put in place in order to control any risk that such products might raise with regard to the protection of animal health, human health or the environment. Member States should set up such a system as and where necessary, in cooperation with regional and local authorities.
Amendment 153 #
2014/0255(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10
Article 10
Medicated feed and intermediate products shall be placed on the market only in properly labelled and sealed packages or containers. Packages or containers shall be sealed in such a way that, when the package or container is opened, the seal is damaged and cannot be reused.
Amendment 217 #
2014/0255(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17
Article 17
Member States, in cooperation with regional and local authorities, shall ensure that appropriate collection systems are in place for medicated feed and intermediate products that are expired or in case the animal holder has received a bigger quantity of medicated feed than he actually uses for the treatment referred to in the veterinary prescription.
Amendment 10 #
2014/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No 1215/2009
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the abstention of the countries and territories referred to in Article 1 from engaging in serious and systematic violations of human rights, including core labour rights, or of fundamental freedoms, the principles of democracy and the rule of law.
Amendment 18 #
2014/0185(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. Involvement of the largest possible number of Member States in a project shall be encouraged. Member States shall be able, and encouraged,and their local and regional authorities in a project shall be encouraged and they shall be able to join a project at any stage.
Amendment 101 #
2014/0185(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. Involvement of the largest possible number of Member States, local and regional authorities, in a project shall be encouraged. Member States shall be able, and encouraged, to join a project at any stage.
Amendment 119 #
2014/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) For small driftnets the above prohibition shall apply from 1 January 2018.
Amendment 13 #
2014/0120(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) In order to facilitate the cross-border activities of SMEs and the establishment of single-member companies as subsidiaries in other Member States, the costs, procedures, and administrative burdens involved in setting- up these companies should be reduced.
Amendment 23 #
2014/0120(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The availability of a harmonised legal framework governing the formation of single-member companies, including the establishment of a uniform template for the articles of association should contribute to the progressive abolition of restrictions on freedom of establishment as regards the conditions for setting up subsidiaries in the territories of Member States and lead to a reduction in costs and procedures.
Amendment 58 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Because of the local nature of mass catering operations, measures taken by Member States, in particular by regional and local authorities, and private schemes in this area are considered adequate to ensure the functioning of the single market. Therefore, food prepared by mass caterers on their premises should not be subject to this Regulation. Equally, products of hunting and fishing of wild animals should not be covered by this Regulation since the production process cannot be fully controlled.
Amendment 112 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52
Recital 52
(52) The labelling of agricultural products and foodstuffs should be subject to the general rules laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council32, and in particular the provisions aimed at preventing labelling that may confuse or mislead consumers. In addition, specific provisions relating to the labelling of organic products should be laid down in this Regulation. They should protect both the interests of operators in having their products correctly identified on the market and enjoying conditions of fair competition, and thosee strong interests of consumers in enabling them to make informed choices leaving no room for doubt. __________________ 32 Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004 (OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 18). –
Amendment 117 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 60
Recital 60
(60) Small farmers in the Union face, individually, relatively high inspection costs and an administrative burden linked to organic certification, raising their production costs and hence reducing their competitiveness. A system of group certification should be allowed with a view to reducing the inspection and certification costs and the associated administrative burden, strengthening local networks, contributing to better market outlets and ensuring a level playing field with operators in third countries. For that reason, the concept of ‘group of operators’ should be introduced and defined.
Amendment 132 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 75
Recital 75
(75) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards the technical details for the establishment of the single database for the listing of the varieties, in particular traditional and rare varieties, for which plant reproductive material obtained by the organic production method is available, as regards the authorisation or the withdrawal of the authorisation of the products and substances that may be used in organic production in general and in the production of processed organic food in particular, including the procedures to be followed for the authorisation and the lists of those products and substances and, where appropriate, their description, compositional requirement and conditions for use, as regards the specific and practical modalities regarding the presentation, composition and size of the indications referring to the code numbers of control authorities and control bodies and of the indication of the place where the agricultural raw materials have been farmed, the assignment of code numbers to control authorities and control bodies and the indication of the place where the agricultural raw materials have been farmed, as regards the details and specifications regarding the content, form and way of notification of the notifications by operators and groups of operators of their activity to the competent authorities and the form of publication of the fees that may be collected for the controls, as regards the exchange of information between groups of operators and competent authorities, control authorities and control bodies and between Member States and the Commission, as regards the recognition or withdrawal of the recognition of control authorities and control bodies which are competent to carry out controls in third countries and the establishment of the list of those control authorities and control bodies and rules to ensure the application of measures in relation to cases of non- compliance, or suspicion thereof, affecting the integrity of imported organic products, as regards the establishment of a list of third countries recognised under Article 33(2) of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 and the amendment of that list as well as rules to ensure the application of measures in relation to cases of non-compliance, or suspicion thereof, affecting the integrity of organic products imported from those countries, as regards the system to be used to transmit the information necessary for the implementation and monitoring of this Regulation, and as regards the establishment of the list of control authorities and control bodies recognised under Article 33(3) of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 and the amendment of that list. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council34. __________________ 34 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
Amendment 134 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 75 a (new)
Recital 75 a (new)
(75a) To preserve Europe’s biodiversity, a European gene bank, as well as the single database, should be set up in cooperation with Member States and regional and local authorities.
Amendment 162 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point e – point iii
Article 4 – point e – point iii
(iii) exclude the use of GMOs and products produced from or by GMOs with the exception of veterinary medicinal products;
Amendment 170 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – point b
Article 5 – point b
(b) limitation ofincrease in the use of non-renewable resources ands far as possible and limitation of the use of external inputs to a minimum;
Amendment 254 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Furthermore, anyit shall be prohibited to use terms, including terms used in trademarks, or practices used in labelling or advertising liable to mislead the consumer or user by suggesting that a product or its ingredients comply with this Regulation shall not be used.
Amendment 376 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Research projects have demonstrated that consumer confidence is crucial in the market for organic food. In the long run, rules that are not trustworthy can jeopardise public confidence and lead to market failure. Therefore the sustainable development of organic production in the Union should be based on sound production rules which are harmonised at Union level. In addition, those production rules should meet operators' and consumers' expectations regarding the quality of organic products and the compliance with the principles and rules laid down in this Regulation. Given the track record of persistent deficiencies of controls on a European level, it is of utmost importance to improve data collection, communication, monitoring and coordination of the implementation of these rules in all Member States and on a European level. The Commission should, therefore, streamline and step up efforts to coordinate effectively these measures, as the growth of the organic sector depends on availability of data related to organic production and the credibility in the perception of consumers.
Amendment 446 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 51 a (new)
Recital 51 a (new)
(51a) This regulation is underpinned by the process approach to organic farming and it recognises that organic producers should not be punished for unintentional contamination of their products; therefore, the polluter pays principle should be maintained and pesticide residue limits shall not be imposed on organic production.
Amendment 496 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
This Regulation shall apply to agricultural products listed in Annex I to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘the Treaty') and to somethe following products originating from agriculture, including aquaculture, where such products are, or are intended to be, produced, prepared, distributed, placed on the Union market, or imported into or exported from the Union as organic: (a) live or unprocessed agricultural products, including seed and other plant reproductive material; (b) processed agricultural products for food; (c) feed; (d) algae and aquaculture animals; (e) wine; (f) yeast; (g) mushrooms; (h) collected wild plants and parts thereof, and to other products listed in Annex I to this Regulation, insofar as those agricultural products and those other products closely linked to agriculture are intended to be produced, prepared, distributed, placed on the market, imported or exported as organic.
Amendment 508 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Mass catering operations shall not be subject to this Regulation. Member States may apply national rules or, in the absence thereof, private standards, on labelling and control of products originating from mass catering operations, in so far as the said rules comply with Union Law.
Amendment 521 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7
(7) ‘'group of operators' means a group in which each operator is a farmer who has a holding of up to 5 hectares of utilised agricultural area and who may, in addition to producing food or feed, be engaged in processing of food or feed;: (i) managed exclusively by farmers through an internal control system; (ii) in which each operator may, in addition to producing food or feed, be engaged in processing of food or feed; (iii) whose farms are geographically close; (iv) in which the production involves only one type of production.
Amendment 600 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) exclusion of genetic engineering, animal cloning, artificially induced polyploidy in animal production and ionising radiation from the whole organic food chain;
Amendment 631 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. By way of derogation from paragraph 1 (a), a holding may be split up into clearly separated units or aquaculture production sites which are not all managed under organic production. As regards animals, different species shall be involved. As regards aquaculture the same species may be involved, provided that there is adequate separation between the production sites. As regards plants, different varieties that can be easily differentiated/distinguished shall be involved. Where, in accordance with the second subparagraph, not all units of a holding are used for organic production, the operator shall keep the land, animals, and products used for, or produced by, the organic units separate from those used for, or produced by, the non-organic units and keep adequate records to show the separation.
Amendment 772 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20
Article 20
Amendment 818 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 21 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) in the list of ingredients and in the same visual field as the sales description, provided that: (i) the main ingredient is a product of hunting or fishing; (ii) it contains other ingredients of agricultural origin that are all organic; (iii) the food complies with the requirements in Annex II part VI.
Amendment 821 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 21 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The list of ingredients referred to in point (ba), (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph shall indicate which ingredients are organic. The references to organic production may only appear in relation to the organic ingredients. That list of ingredients shall include an indication of the total percentage of organic ingredients in proportion to the total quantity of agricultural ingredients.
Amendment 823 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Article 21 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
The terms referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall not be used for a product for which it has to be indicated in the labelling or advertising that it contains GMOs, consists of GMOs or is produced from GMOs according to Union provisions.
Amendment 849 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 a (new)
Article 23 a (new)
Article 23 a Control system 1. Official controls in relation to organic production and labelling of organic products shall be performed for the verification of compliance with the provisions of this Regulation and shall include, in particular, the verification of the application of preventive measures. 2. The nature and frequency of the official controls shall be determined on the basis of the likelihood of non- compliance. All operators and groups of operators (with the exception of those who sell products directly to the final consumer or user provided that they do not produce, prepare, store other than in connection with the point of sale, organic products or import such products from a third country or have not contracted out such activities to a third party) shall be subject to a verification of compliance at least once a year. The verification of compliance shall imply a physical on-the- spot inspection, except where Member States decide that in duly justified cases the operators and group of operators concerned present a proven low-risk profile and fulfil the criteria of compliant track-record of at least 3 years. In those duly justified cases, however, the period between two physical on-the-spot inspections shall not exceed thirty months.
Amendment 919 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
Article 28 – paragraph 3
3. The respect of the conditions and measures for the import of organic products into the Union shall be ascertained by the control provisions laid down in chapter V and at border control posts, in accordance with Article 45(1) of Regulation (EU) No XXX/XXX (Official controls regulation). The physical checks referred to in Article 47(3) of that Regulation shall be performed at a frequency dependent on the risk of non- compliance with this Regulation.
Amendment 923 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Article 30 – paragraph 1
A recognised third country as referred to in the first indentpoint (b)(ii) of Article 28(1)(b)(ii) is a third country which the Union has recognised under a trade agreement as having a system of production meeting the same objectives and principles by applying rules which ensure the same level of assurance of conformity as those of the Union.
Amendment 926 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 930 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
A recognised third country as referred to in the second indentpoint (b)(ii) of Article 28(1)(b)(ii) is a third country which has been recognised for the purposes of equivalence under Article 33(2) of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007, including those recognised under the transitional measure provided for in Article 40. The recognition of the third countries referred to in the first subparagraph shall expire when all recognized third countries have been transferred to the new rules.
Amendment 946 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1
Article 35 – paragraph 1
By 31 December 20210, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the availability of organic plant reproductive material and animals for breeding purposes. , feed, animals for breeding purposes, young poultry and parent animals for poultry production and aquaculture juveniles on the Union market, identifying potential gaps and the reasons for those gaps and outlining a plan and possible measures for closing those gaps, including support measures designed to stimulate the market. That report shall be based on a study including data collection and analysis in Member States.
Amendment 965 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1
Article 41 – paragraph 1
1. The recognition of control authorities and control bodies granted under Article 33(3) of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 shall expire on [31 December 2018] at the latwhen all recognised third countries have been transferred to the new rulest.
Amendment 989 #
Amendment 994 #
Amendment 999 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – indent 19 d (new)
Annex I – indent 19 d (new)
- traditional herbal medicinal products,
Amendment 1059 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 1.3.5
Annex II – part II – point 1.3.5
1.3.5. For breeding purposes, non- organically raised animals may be brought onto an agricultural holding when breeds are in danger of being lost to farming in accordance with Annex IV to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/200668 and in that case animals of those breeds must not necessarily be nulliparous holding, only when organic animals are not available in sufficient number and subject to the conditions provided for in the following points a to d of this Article. __________________ 68 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 of 15 December 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ L 368, 23.12.2006, p. 15).
Amendment 1089 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 1.4.3.2 a (new)
Annex II – part II – point 1.4.3.2 a (new)
1.4.3.2a. Feed from own holding and other sources In the case of herbivores, except during the period each year when the animals are under transhumance subject to point 1.4.2.2, at least 60 % of the feed shall come from the farm unit itself or, where this is not feasible, shall be produced in cooperation with other organic farms in the same region. In the case of pigs and poultry, at least 20% of the feed shall come from the farm unit itself or, where this is not feasible, shall be produced in cooperation with other organic farms or feed business operators in the same region. In the case of bees, at the end of the production season hives shall be left with sufficient reserves of honey and pollen to survive the winter. The feeding of bee colonies shall only be permitted where the survival of the hives is endangered due to climatic conditions. Feeding shall be with organic honey, organic sugar syrups, or organic sugar.
Amendment 1102 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 1.5.2.4
Annex II – part II – point 1.5.2.4
1.5.2.4. With the exception of vaccinations, treatments for parasites, phytotherapeutic and homeopathic products and compulsory eradication schemes where an animal or group of animals receive more than three courses of treatments with chemically- synthesised allopathic veterinary medicinal products including antibiotics within 12 months, or more than one course of treatment if their productive lifecycle is less than one year, the livestock concerned, or produce derived from them, shall not be sold as organic products, and the livestock shall undergo the conversion periods referred to in points 1.2 and 2.
Amendment 1103 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 1.5.2.5
Annex II – part II – point 1.5.2.5
1.5.2.5. The withdrawal period between the last administration of an allopathic chemically synthesised veterinary medicinal product to an animal under normal conditions of use, and the production of organically produced foodstuffs from such animals, is toshall be twice the withdrawal period as referred to in Article 119 of Directive 2001/82/EC and at least 48 hours. Directive 2001/82/EC or, in a case in which this period is not specified, 48 hours, except for phytotherapeutic and homeopathic products without legal withdrawal period.
Amendment 1188 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 2.3.2 – paragraph 1 – point a
Annex II – part II – point 2.3.2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) at least 620 % of the feed shall come from the farm itself or in case this is not feasible, be produced in the same region in cooperation with other organic farms or feed operators;
Amendment 1222 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 2.4.3 – paragraph 1 – point a
Annex II – part II – point 2.4.3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) at least 620 % of the feed shall come from the farm itself or in case this is not feasible, be produced in the same region in cooperation with other organic farms or feed operators;
Amendment 1274 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part III – point 4.1.2.1 – point a
Annex II – part III – point 4.1.2.1 – point a
(a) organic aquaculture shallFor on-growing purposes, when organic aquaculture juvenile animals are not available, subject to the following restrictions: a) organic juveniles should be baused on the rearing of young stock originating from organic broodstock and organic holdings; when available b) at least the latter three quarters of the duration of the production cycle shall be managed under organic management. Each Member State shall ensure that a computerized database is established for listing the aquaculture species for which organic juveniles is available on its territory and the production capacity among certified aquaculture farms. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts laying down the technical details for establishing the database referred to in paragraph 2. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination
Amendment 1282 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part III – point 4.1.3.3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Annex II – part III – point 4.1.3.3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
(f) Astaxanthin derived primarily from organic sources, such as organic crustacean shells may be used in the feed ration for salmon and trout within the limit of their physiological needs. If organic sources are not available natural sources of astaxanthin (such as Phaffia yeast) may be used.
Amendment 1286 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part III – point 4.1.4.2 – paragraph 1 – point e
Annex II – part III – point 4.1.4.2 – paragraph 1 – point e
Amendment 8 #
2014/0096(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1
Article 1
This Directive applies to caseins and caseinates, for business to business purposes and the preparation of food products and which are intended for human consumption and mixtures thereof.
Amendment 10 #
2014/0096(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The mandatory particulars to be marked on the packages, containers or labels of the products defined in Article 2 shall be easily visible, clearly legible, fully understandable and in indelible characters, and shall be the following:
Amendment 11 #
2014/0096(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the name or business name and the address of the operator under whose name or business name the food is marketed or, if that operator is not established in the Union, the importer or the importers into the Union market;
Amendment 12 #
2014/0096(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) in the case of products imported from third countries, the name of the producer and country of origin;
Amendment 13 #
2014/0096(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 31 March 2015 at the latest. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those harmonised provisions.
Amendment 14 #
2014/0096(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the mainentire provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.
Amendment 159 #
2014/0032(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The breeding of domestic animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine and equine species, and to a lesser extent the breeding of animals of other species, occupyies an important place in Union agriculture and is a source of income for the agricultural community. The breeding of animals of those species is best encouraged if purebred breeding animals or hybrid breeding pigs of recorded high genetic quality are used. The importance of crossbreeding in bovine, ovine and caprine species should also be taken into account.
Amendment 168 #
2014/0032(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Accordingly, the rules on purebred and crossbred breeding animals laid down in this Regulation should aim at granting access to trade based on agreed principles applicable to the recognition of breed societies managing breeds and the approval of their respective breeding programmes. This Regulation should also lay down criteria governing the entry of purebred breeding animals in the different classes of the main section of breeding books, the entry of crossbred breeding animals in supplementary sections of breeding books, rules for performance testing and genetic evaluation and criteria for the acceptance of breeding animals for breeding as well as the content of the zootechnical certificates.
Amendment 193 #
2014/0032(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) ‘breeding animal’ means a purebred or crossbred breeding animal or a hybrid breeding pig;
Amendment 206 #
2014/0032(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i – point i
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i – point i
(i) of the species referred to in point (a)(i) which descentshas at least 87.5% of the bloodline of the same breed based on the pedigree as registered in the breeding book, is descended from parents and grandparents entered in the main section of athe breeding book of the same breed and whichand is itself entered or registered and eligible for entry in the main section of such a breeding book in accordance with Article 19;
Amendment 234 #
2014/0032(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the approval of a further breeding programme would fragment the population of purebred breeding animals available in that Member State to an extendt that would compromjeopardise the preservation or the genetic diversity of that rare and/or endangered breed.
Amendment 274 #
2014/0032(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 23 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In the case of rare or endangered breeds, the competent authority of a Member State shall be authorised to prohibit the use of a purebred breeding animal and its germinal products in order to guarantee the preservation and genetic diversity of the breed concerned.
Amendment 82 #
2014/0014(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
(5 a) The Union, the Member States and the national health authorities should particularly take into account, when choosing fruits, vegetables and milk, the typical local and regional eating habits of children. This highlights the need to respect the local and regional eating and cultural specificities. The respect, where possible, of the selection of fruits, vegetables and milk on the local and regional market strengthens the local and regional economy reducing distribution costs and the environmental damage.
Amendment 102 #
2014/0014(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure the efficient and targeted use of Union funds, the power to adopt certain acts should be delegated to the Commission in respect of measures fixing the indicative allocations of the Union aid to each Member State and the methods for reallocating aid between Member States on the basis of aid requests received. The indicative allocations should be fixed separately for the fruit and vegetables including bananas and milk in line with the voluntary approach to distribution. The allocation key for fruit and vegetables including bananas should reflect the current allocations by Member States, based on the objective criteria of the number of children in the age group of six- to ten-year olds as a proportion of the population, taking into the account also the development status of regions concerned. In order to allow Member States to maintain the scale of their current programmes and with a view of encouraging others to take up the distribution of milk, it is appropriate to use the combination of two keys for the allocation of the funds for milk, namely the historical use of funds by Member States under the School Milk Scheme - a determined amount will be fixed in the case of the Republic of Croatia which will not be less than the average historical use of the funds by Member States so far - and the objective criteria of the number of children in the age group of six- to ten-year olds as a proportion of the population used for the fruit and vegetables including bananas. In order to find the right proportion for these two keys, the power to adopt certain acts should be delegated to the Commission in respect of adopting additional rules concerning the balance between the two criteria. Furthermore, considering the recurrent changes in the demographic or development situation of regions in Member States, the power to adopt certain acts should be delegated to the Commission in respect of assessing every three years whether the Member States' allocations, based on those criteria, are still up to date.
Amendment 127 #
2014/0014(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11 a) the Member States shall adequately ensure the visibility of the Union's programs among their beneficiaries. This needs to be done highlighting adequately the common identities and symbols of the Union.
Amendment 47 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The free movement of workers is a key element to the development of a more integrated Union labour market which allows worker mobility from high unemployment areas to areas characterised by labour shortages. It also contributes to finding the rightnecessary staff with adequate skills for vacant positions and overcoming bottlenecks in the labour market.
Amendment 50 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) In order to help the workers who enjoy the right to work based on free movement to effectively exercise that right, assistance in accordance with the present Regulation is open to any Union national who has a right to take up an activity as an employed person and their family members, in accordance with Article 45 of the Treaty. Member States shall give the same access to any third- country national benefiting, as per Union or national law, from equal treatment with their own nationals in this field.
Amendment 54 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) Growing interdependency between labour markets and the need for their integration calls for reinforced cooperation between employment services to bring about freedom of movement for all workers through voluntary and fair labour mobility within the Union in accordance with Article 46 (a) of the Treaty, and therefore a common framework for cooperation should be established between Member States and the Commission on labour mobility within the Union. This framework should bring together job vacancies from across the Union and the possibility of applying for those job vacancies ('clearance'), define the provision of related support services to workers and employers and provide for a common approach to share information necessary to facilitate said co-operation.
Amendment 58 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Member States should establish Coordination Offices at national level to provide general support and assistance to all organisations on their territory operating for EURES and support the cooperation with their counterparts in the other Member States and with the European Coordination Office. Those Coordination Offices should in particular have the task of dealingto support the creation of instruments and procedures for the functioning of EURES and to deal with complaints, and problems with job vacancies, and verify compliance issues as regards voluntary and fair labour mobility within the Union.
Amendment 62 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) A broader membership of the EURES network has social, economic and financial benefits. It improves efficiency in service delivery by facilitating partnerships, enhancing complementarity and quality improvements. It increases the market share of the EURES network insofar as new members make available job vacancies, job applications and curriculum vitae ('CV’s'). Transnational and cross- border co-operation, which is a key feature of the operation of the EURES network, couldwill generate innovative forms of learning and co-operation between employment services, including on quality standards for job vacancies and support services. The EURES network would therefore enhance its relevance as one of the key Union tools available to Member States and the European Commission for supporting concrete measures towards a high level of employment within the Union.
Amendment 68 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) A profound understanding of labour demand in terms of occupations, sectors and needs of employers would benefit the right of free movement of workers within the Union and therefore support services should include good quality assistance to employers, small and medium sized enterprises and to handicrafts in particular. Close working relationships between employment services and employers will increase the pool of job vacancies and job matching of suitable candidates, secure pathways for job seekers in particular those in vulnerable groups and improve labour market intelligence.
Amendment 75 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33 a (new)
Recital 33 a (new)
(33a) the implementation of the EURES system, expect of ensuring the right to work and the free movement of workers, creates an effective mechanism of support to the economy and fosters the economic integration.
Amendment 76 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33 b (new)
Recital 33 b (new)
(33b) the implementation of this Regulation with a proper use of information on employment enables the creation of an effective mechanism for a better integration of educational systems and of the labour market, as well as the improvement of education in line with the labour market needs.
Amendment 41 #
2013/0443(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 26 a (new)
Recital 26 a (new)
(26a) The candidate and the potential candidate countries should align, as much as possible, their national regulations with this Directive.
Amendment 125 #
2013/0443(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 26 a (new)
Recital 26 a (new)
(26a) calls the candidate and the potential candidate countries to, as much as they can, align their national regulations with this Directive.
Amendment 29 #
2013/0442(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) To ensure the consistency and coherence of the Member State information on the implementation of this Directive and promote exchange of information between Member States and the Commission, the Commission, assisted by the European Environment Agency, should develop an electronic reporting tool also available for internal use by Member States for national reporting and data management purposes. The Commission, with the support of the European Environment Agency and national authorities, shall ensure, upon the request of local and regional authorities where the medium combustion plants is located, all relevant data.
Amendment 131 #
2013/0442(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Data listed in paragraph 2 shall be made available to the local and regional authorities where the medium combustion plant is located.
Amendment 37 #
2013/0435(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) A high level of protection of human health and of consumers’ interests and of the environment and the effective functioning of the internal market should be assured in the pursuit of Union food policies, whilst ensuring transparency.
Amendment 51 #
2013/0435(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Emerging technologies in food production processes may have an impact on food and thereby on food safety and on the environment. Therefore, it should also be clarified that a food should be considered as a novel food where a production process which was not previously used for food production in the Union is applied to that food or when foods contain or consist of engineered nanomaterials, as defined in Article 2(2)(t) of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council16 . __________________ 16 Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directive 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC No 608/2004 (OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 18).
Amendment 77 #
2013/0435(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) New technologies and innovations like biotechnology and nanotechnology in food production should be fostered as this could reduce the environmental impact of food production, enhance food security and bring benefits to consumers. Developments in food production should therefore always be judged according to the latest available scientific evidence in order to ensure sound scientific confirmation of European food safety.
Amendment 107 #
2013/0435(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down rules for the placing of novel foods on the market within the Union in order to ensure the effective functioning of the internal market while providing a high level of protection of human health, the environment and consumer interests.
Amendment 173 #
2013/0435(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) it does not, on the basis of the scientific evidence available, pose a safety risk to human health and where applicable the environment;
Amendment 215 #
2013/0435(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c
(c) scientific evidence demonstrating that the novel food does not pose a safety risk to human health and where applicable the environment;
Amendment 223 #
2013/0435(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission mayshall request EFSA to render its opinion if the update is liable to have an effect on human health.
Amendment 234 #
2013/0435(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) whether the composition of the novel food and the conditions of its use do not pose a safety risk to human health in the Union and where applicable to the environment.
Amendment 268 #
2013/0435(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) whether the composition of the food and the conditions of its use, do not pose a safety risk to human health in the Union and where applicable the environment.
Amendment 51 #
2013/0433(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4
Article 4
Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and unequivocally and strongly dissuasive. Member States shall notify those provisions to the Commission by [date for transposition of the Directive] at the latest and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.’
Amendment 163 #
2013/0433(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and manifestly and strongly dissuasive. Member States shall notify those provisions to the Commission by [date for transposition of the Directive] at the latest and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.’
Amendment 65 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28 a (new)
Recital 28 a (new)
(28a) Given that candidate countries and potential candidates are working with Union bodies, those countries should also bring their national provisions into line with this Directive.
Amendment 2 #
2013/0255(APP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph C
Paragraph C
C. Whereas some Member States might be less effective in the detection and prosecution of fraud affecting the EU financial interests, thus harming the taxpayers of all EU Member States who contribute to the Union budget;
Amendment 5 #
2013/0255(APP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph E
Paragraph E
E. Whereas different jurisdictions, legal traditions and, law enforcement and judicial systems in the Member States should not hinder or undermine the fight against fraud and crime affecting the Union’s financial interests;
Amendment 10 #
2013/0255(APP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Reaffirms its strong willingness to addresssupport the priorities for the establishment of the EPPO and to identify the principles and the conditions under which it might give its consent;
Amendment 19 #
2013/0255(APP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Deems it crucial to ensure within a short period of time the establishment of a competent, single, strong, independent EPPO that is able to investigate, prosecute and bring to court the perpetrators of criminal offences affecting the Union’s financial interests; and considers that any weaker solution would be a cost for the Union budget;
Amendment 28 #
2013/0255(APP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises that the structure of the EPPO should reflect a maximum degree of independence and therefore calls for openness, objectiveness and transparency in the selection and appointment procedures of the European Prosecutors;
Amendment 41 #
2013/0255(APP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that rules governing the division of jurisdiction between the EPPO and the national authorities should be clear and avoid any misinterpretation in the operational phase: the EPPO should exclusively have jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute the offences constituting fraud to the Union's financial interests according to the directive on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law;
Amendment 61 #
2013/0255(APP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the legislator to ensure streamlined procedures for the EPPO to obtain the authorisation of investigative measures in cross-border caseprograms and projects, in accordance with the law of the Member States where the measure in question is executed;