BETA

15 Amendments of Steeve BRIOIS related to 2016/0282(COD)

Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Up to 10%All of the funds of the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA II), the European Neighbourhood Instrument and the financing instrument for development cooperation (DCI) mayust be kept unallocated at the beginning of the financial year to allow additional funding to respond to major unforeseen needs, or new crises situations or significant political shifts in third countries, in addition to the amounts already programmed. These unallocated funds, if not committed during the year, should be carried over by a Decision of the CommissionEuropean Parliament.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) The rules governing transfers of appropriations should allow for greater flexibility in order to ensure better budget implementation. To that end, it is important for the Commission to have the possibility of deciding on transfers, of up to 10%, of operational appropriations between Titles when they are covered by the same basic act. Transfers from administrative support lines to the corresponding operational lines should also be done autonomously by the Commission.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) Information on scholarships, and other direct support paid to natural persons in most need should remain exempt from publication.deleted
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 60
(60) It is important to allow Member States to request that resources allocated to them under shared implementation are transferred at Union level and implemented by the Commission in direct or indirect implementation, where possible for the benefit of the Member State concerned. This would optimise the use of these resources and of the instruments established under this Regulation or under sector specific Regulations including the EFSI Regulation, to which the Member States would request these resources to be transferred. In order to guarantee an efficient implementation of these instruments, it is necessary to foresee that where resources are transferred to instruments established under this Regulation or under sector specific Regulations including the EFSI Regulation, the rules of those regulations shall apply.deleted
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 172
(172) With a view to responding to the challenges posed by increasing flows of migrants and refugees, the objectives to which the ERDF may contribute in its support of migrants and refugees should be spelled out.deleted
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 172 a (new)
(172a) Given that the primary objective of the European structural funds is to reduce regional disparities and promote sustainable and inclusive growth within the Member States as part of cohesion policy, that irregular migrant reception policies will effectively deprive the real economy of funding and that the migration flood is a source of disruption and destabilisation for the peoples of Europe, European structural funds must not be used to finance the settlement of irregular migrants in the European Union.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 176
(176) In view of maximising the synergies between all Union funds to address the challenges of migration and asylum in an effective way, it should be ensured that, when the thematic objectives are translated into priorities in the Fund- specific rules, such priorities cover the appropriate use of each Fund for these areas.deleted
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 180
(180) In order to facilitate the implementation of community-led local development and integrated territorial investments, the roles and responsibilities of local action groups in the case of community-led local development strategies and local authorities, regional development bodies or non-governmental organisations in the case of ITIs in relation to other programme bodies should be clarified. Designation as intermediate body should only be required in cases where the relevant bodies carry out tasks which go beyond those described in the relevant Article or where it is required by the Fund specific rules.deleted
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 202
(202) With a view to improving the effectiveness and impact of operations implementation of nation-wide operations or operations covering different programme areas should be facilitated and possibilities for expenditure outside the Union for certain investments should be increased . There is also a need to increase the possibilities for investment spending outside the Union in certain cases.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 214
(214) Nowadays farmers are exposed to increasing economic risks as a consequence of market developments. However, those economic risks do not affect all agricultural sectors equally. Consequently, Member States should have the possibility, in duly justified cases, to help farmers with sector-specific income stabilisation tools, in particular for sectors affected by a severe income drops, which would have a significant economic impact for a specific rural area, provided that the international obligations of the Union are respected. In addition, in order to monitor the expenditure made in relation to this new tool, the content of the financial plan of the programme should be adapted. Moreover, the specific reporting requirement for the risk management measure in 2018 referred to in Article 36(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 is already covered by the report to the European Parliament and the Council on the monitoring and evaluation of the CAP referred to in Article 110(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013. Therefore the second subparagraph of Article 36(5) should be deleted.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 218
(218) Pursuant to Article 60(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013, in cases of emergency measures due to natural disasters, eligibility of expenditure relating to programme changes may start from the date when the natural disaster occurred. This possibility to make eligible expenditure made before the submission of a programme amendment should be extended to other circumstances, such as catastrophic events or a significant and sudden change in the socio-economic conditions of the Member State or region, including sudden and significant demographic changes resulting from migration or reception of refugees.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 264 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 1301/2013
Article 5 – paragraph 9 – point e
2. In Article 5, in paragraph 9, the following point (e) is added: “(e) supporting the reception and social and economic integration of migrants and refugees” ‘deleted
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 264 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) No 1301/2013
Annex I – table on Social infrastructure and Urban Development specific indicators
3. In the table of Annex I, the text starting with “Social infrastructure” until the end of the table is replaced by the following: “Social infrastructure Childcare & education persons Capacity of supported childcare or educational infrastructure Health persons Population covered by improved health services Housing housing units Rehabilitated housing housing units Rehabilitated housing, of which for migrants and refugees (not including reception centres) Migrants and refugees persons Capacity of infrastructure supporting migrants and refugees (other than housing) Urban Development specific indicators persons Population living in areas with integrated urban development strategies square metres Open space created or rehabilitated in urban areas square metres Public or commercial buildings built or renovated in urban areasdeleted
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 9 – subparagraph 2a
4. In Article 9, the following subparagraph is added: “The priorities established for each of the ESI Funds in the Fund specific rules shall in particular cover the appropriate use of each Fund in the areas of migration and asylum.” ‘deleted
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 60
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 152 – paragraph 3a
Where a call for proposal is launched prior to the entry into force of Regulation XXX/YYY amending the present Regulation tThe managing authority (or monitoring committee for the programmes under the European territorial cooperation goal) may decide not to apply the obligation set out in Article 67(2a) for a maximum of 612 months starting from the date of entry into force of Regulation XXX/YYY. Where the document setting out the cthe managing authority (or monditions for support is provided to the beneficiary within a period of 6 months starting from the date of entry into force of Regulation XXX/YYY the managing authororing committee for the programmes under the European territorial cooperation goal) considers that the obligation under Article 67(2a) creates a disproportionate administrative burden, ity may decide not to apply those amended provisionsto extend the aforementioned period until the end of the programme.”
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI