15 Amendments of Steeve BRIOIS related to 2016/0282(COD)
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Up to 10%All of the funds of the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA II), the European Neighbourhood Instrument and the financing instrument for development cooperation (DCI) mayust be kept unallocated at the beginning of the financial year to allow additional funding to respond to major unforeseen needs, or new crises situations or significant political shifts in third countries, in addition to the amounts already programmed. These unallocated funds, if not committed during the year, should be carried over by a Decision of the CommissionEuropean Parliament.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) The rules governing transfers of appropriations should allow for greater flexibility in order to ensure better budget implementation. To that end, it is important for the Commission to have the possibility of deciding on transfers, of up to 10%, of operational appropriations between Titles when they are covered by the same basic act. Transfers from administrative support lines to the corresponding operational lines should also be done autonomously by the Commission.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 60
Recital 60
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 172
Recital 172
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 172 a (new)
Recital 172 a (new)
(172a) Given that the primary objective of the European structural funds is to reduce regional disparities and promote sustainable and inclusive growth within the Member States as part of cohesion policy, that irregular migrant reception policies will effectively deprive the real economy of funding and that the migration flood is a source of disruption and destabilisation for the peoples of Europe, European structural funds must not be used to finance the settlement of irregular migrants in the European Union.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 176
Recital 176
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 180
Recital 180
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 202
Recital 202
(202) With a view to improving the effectiveness and impact of operations implementation of nation-wide operations or operations covering different programme areas should be facilitated and possibilities for expenditure outside the Union for certain investments should be increased . There is also a need to increase the possibilities for investment spending outside the Union in certain cases.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 214
Recital 214
(214) Nowadays farmers are exposed to increasing economic risks as a consequence of market developments. However, those economic risks do not affect all agricultural sectors equally. Consequently, Member States should have the possibility, in duly justified cases, to help farmers with sector-specific income stabilisation tools, in particular for sectors affected by a severe income drops, which would have a significant economic impact for a specific rural area, provided that the international obligations of the Union are respected. In addition, in order to monitor the expenditure made in relation to this new tool, the content of the financial plan of the programme should be adapted. Moreover, the specific reporting requirement for the risk management measure in 2018 referred to in Article 36(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 is already covered by the report to the European Parliament and the Council on the monitoring and evaluation of the CAP referred to in Article 110(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013. Therefore the second subparagraph of Article 36(5) should be deleted.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 218
Recital 218
(218) Pursuant to Article 60(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013, in cases of emergency measures due to natural disasters, eligibility of expenditure relating to programme changes may start from the date when the natural disaster occurred. This possibility to make eligible expenditure made before the submission of a programme amendment should be extended to other circumstances, such as catastrophic events or a significant and sudden change in the socio-economic conditions of the Member State or region, including sudden and significant demographic changes resulting from migration or reception of refugees.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 264 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 264 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 1301/2013
Article 5 – paragraph 9 – point e
Article 5 – paragraph 9 – point e
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 264 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 264 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) No 1301/2013
Annex I – table on Social infrastructure and Urban Development specific indicators
Annex I – table on Social infrastructure and Urban Development specific indicators
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 9 – subparagraph 2a
Article 9 – subparagraph 2a
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 60
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 60
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 152 – paragraph 3a
Article 152 – paragraph 3a
“Where a call for proposal is launched prior to the entry into force of Regulation XXX/YYY amending the present Regulation tThe managing authority (or monitoring committee for the programmes under the European territorial cooperation goal) may decide not to apply the obligation set out in Article 67(2a) for a maximum of 612 months starting from the date of entry into force of Regulation XXX/YYY. Where the document setting out the cthe managing authority (or monditions for support is provided to the beneficiary within a period of 6 months starting from the date of entry into force of Regulation XXX/YYY the managing authororing committee for the programmes under the European territorial cooperation goal) considers that the obligation under Article 67(2a) creates a disproportionate administrative burden, ity may decide not to apply those amended provisionsto extend the aforementioned period until the end of the programme.”