Activities of Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI related to 2016/2052(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
European Defence Union (A8-0316/2016 - Urmas Paet) FR
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on European Defence Union
Amendments (5)
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that a well-functioning internal market can only positively contribute to the objectives of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP)is certainly not a common solution for security problems faced by the EU;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Acknowledges that the current geopolitical environment and the situation in Europe call for the Union to assume greater responsibilities in the fields of both external and internal security and to pursue more ambitious goals such as a European Army, and welcomes the European Council’s conclusions of June 2015 asking for further development of both civilisuch as border controls by the member states and and military capabilities and the strengthening of Europe’s defence industry efficient fight against Islamic terrorism;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that the new CSDP provides greater flexibility, for example through strongermust be in accordance with the constitutional laws of the member states in which a NATO membership should be excluded; suggest that a Member State cooperation within a ‘permanent structured cooperation’ framework should take place, which could take various forms, including joint development and procurement; calls for the creation of a structure for thean efficient exchange of information on terrorism and cybersecurity between the Member states;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that stimulating technological developments in Europe is vital in order to satisfy the upcoming needs of European armed forces, as is fos should be determing a more integrated internal market through the development of joint cooperative programmes, under which the Joint Research Ceed, as the political goal of a common EU Army would be treat as an integration in the NATO pact, which is not in the intere could aggregate dual-use technology efforts across the EUst of some member state as it would include serious violation of some member states constitutions;
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8