4 Amendments of Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS related to 2016/0132(COD)
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The Commission’s Communication on Stronger and Smarter Information Systems for Borders and Security28 highlights the need to improve the interoperability of information systems as a long-term objective, as also identified by the European Council and the Council. The Communication proposes to set up an Expert Group on Information Systems and Interoperability to address the legal and technical feasibility of achieving interoperability of the information systems for borders and security. This group should assess the necessity and proportionality of establishingand examine if there is a need to revise the legal framework for law enforcement access to Eurodac. Technological solutions should be developed to ensure the interoperability of Eurodac with the Schengen Information Systems (SIS) and, the Visa Information Systems (VIS), and examine if there is a need to revise the legal framewEuropol and the Entry-Exit-System (EES) in order to enhance effective cooperation amongst Member States in managing external borders and combatting serious crime. Should additional data of minors be included in a future version of Eurodac, Member States should also recorkd for law enforcement access to EURODACamily links in order to facilitate family reunification and trace missing children. _________________ 28 COM(2016) 205 final
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) The best interests of the minor should be a primary consideration for Member States when applying this Regulation. Where the requesting Member State establishes that Eurodac data pertain to a child, these data may only be used for law enforcement purposes by the requesting Member State, to ensure access to protection systems and to trace missing children in accordance with that State's laws applicable to minors and in accordance with the obligation to give primary consideration to the best interests of the child.
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. Taking fingerprints and facial images of minors from the age of six shall be carried out in a child-friendly and child- sensitive manner by officials trained specifically to enrol minor's fingerprints and facial images. The minor shall be informed in an age-appropriate manner using leaflets and/or infographics and/or demonstrations specifically designed to explain the fingerprinting and facial image procedure to minors in a language they can understand and they shall be accompanied by a responsible adult, guardian or representative at the time their fingerprints and facial image are taken. At all times Member States must respect the dignity and physical integrity of the minor during the fingerprinting procedure and when capturing a facial image.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 4
Article 2 – paragraph 4
4. Without prejudice to paragraph 3 of this Article, where enrolment of the fingerprints or facial image is not possible from third-country nationals who are deemed to be vulnerable persons and from a minor due to the conditions of the fingertips or face, the authorities of that Member State shall not use sanctions to coerce the taking of fingerprints or a facial image. A Member State may attempt to re- take the fingerprints or facial image of a minor or vulnerable person who refuses to comply, where the reason for non- compliance is not related to the conditions of the fingertips or facial image or the health of the individual and where it is duly justified to do so. Where a minor, in particular an unaccompanied or separated minor refuses to give their fingerprints or a facial image and there are reasonable grounds to suspect that there are child safeguarding or protection risks, the minor shall be referred to the national child protection authorities and /or national referral mechanisms.