10 Amendments of Jean-François JALKH related to 2018/2010(INI)
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. In particular, the Peruvian participants at the meeting of 7/12/16 pointed out a number of legislative amendments which lowered the level of protection of workers, as regards both the environment and labour law, contrary to the provisions of Article 2771 a; _________________ 1aSummary of discussions and key messages of civil society representatives and participants from the EU, Colombia and Peru (Trade and Sustainable Development - Title of the EU-Colombia and Peru Trade Agreement). Brussels- Lima-Bogotá, 7 December 2016
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Is concerned about the consequences of new or intensified migratory flows, particularly in northern Colombia, which mean that it is no longer possible to comply with Article 276 as regards working conditions of all, in particular Colombian dual nationals returning to their country of origin, or those of many Peruvians forced into exile;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Welcomes the fact that 2 750 Peruvian and 1 700 Colombian very small and small and medium-sized enterprises have been able to increase or create export trade, thereby creating jobs and markets;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Is concerned that the imbalance in trade found after five years of provisional application may encourage a return of illegal trafficking, and in particular the reuse of cleared land for coca plantations;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Deplores the fact that efforts and commitments concerning working conditions, pollution, deforestation and respect for biodiversity have not borne fruitfailed to meet the initial shared expectations;
Amendment 19 #
7a. Regrets that Peru, particularly in its agri-food exports and especially meat products, cannot provide full assurance of compliance with European standards regarding the use of antibiotics or other substances banned in the EU and urges that certification bodies in agri-food matters must be reliable;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Notes once more that indigenous peoples cannot enjoy security regarding ownership of their land and the conditions under which is worked and, more generally, their rights as a whole;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Calls for the revision of the agreement to include a human rights protection clause with regard to potentially affected communities;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls also though this revision for the introduction of more binding ad hoc arrangements to allow the preferential treatment of fair and sustainable products and to exclude from the agreement those that do not comply with the environmental standards in force;