5 Amendments of Elly SCHLEIN related to 2014/2228(INI)
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph A
Paragraph A
A. Stresses that EU trade and development policies are interlinked andAsks the Commission to respect thate Article 208 of the Lisbon Treaty, which establishes the principle of policy coherence for development, requiring that the objectives of development cooperation be taken into account in policies that are likely to affect developing countries;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph B
Paragraph B
B. Notes that, alRequests the Commission to prepare a thorough analysis, once the provisions of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiation mandateare clearer, of its now public, its wording is so general that itslikely impact on low income countentries and possible spillover effects on developing countries are still not known; calls for a thorough analysis, when TTIP provisions are clearer, of its likely impathe future sustainable development goals, as information on possible spillover effects on low incomedeveloping countries and the future sustainable development goalsre sparse;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph F
Paragraph F
F. Sees, however, the potential of the TTIPRequests the Commission to promote the highest global standards of this century on decent work, environmental protection, and food and product safety. within the negotiations;
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph F b (new)
Paragraph F b (new)
Fb. Calls on the Commission to increase the transparency and democratic nature of negotiations by enhancing dialogue with civil society and other stakeholders.
Amendment 762 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xiv
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xiv
(xiv) to ensure that foreign investors are treated in a non-discriminatory fashion and have a fair opportunity to seek and achieve redress of grievances, which can be achieved withoutle benefiting from no greater rights than domestic investors; to oppose the inclusion of an ISDS mechanism; such a mechanism is not necessary in TTIP given the EU’s and the US’ developed legal systems; a state-to- state dispute settlement system and the use of national courts are the most appropriate tools to address investment disputin TTIP, as other options to enforce investment protection are available, such as domestic remedies;