7 Amendments of Sven SCHULZE related to 2014/2228(INI)
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point i
Paragraph 1 – point i
i) to ensure that TTIP will both safeguard existing jobs and make a significant positive contribution to creating more and better jobs and set ambitious global trade standards for sustainable development and labourin the areas in which progress on a multilateral level is considerably more difficult;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point iii
Paragraph 1 – point iii
iii) to ensure that the horizontal dimensions of labour and social provisions are recognised and fully integrated into all relevant operational parts of thcollated in the chapter on sustainability that is specially provided for that purpose agreement to ensure a coherent and comprehensive approach to trade and sustainable develop taken into account in their entirety in all relevant operational areas of the agreement;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. having in mind that bureaucratic burden and administrative costs which stem from tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade affect small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) disproportionately more than big companies;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point iv
Paragraph 1 – point iv
iv) to ensure that civil society can make a meaningful contributiois listened to and involved in tohe implementingation of relevant TTIP provisions;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point v
Paragraph 1 – point v
v) to take immediate steps to safeguard the right of EU governments to legislate, organise, set quality and safety standards for, manage and regulate public servicesensure that the sensitive issues for the EU in connection with public services and services of general interest (in accordance with the definitions in the EU treaties) in the areas of public education, public health, water supply and waste management are taken into account;
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point vi
Paragraph 1 – point vi
vi) to ensure that the specific challenges faced by SMEs, such as non-tariff trade barriers, are fully taken into account;
Amendment 757 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xiv
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xiv
(xiv) to ensure that foreign investors are treated in a non-discriminatory fashionway and have a fair opportunity to seek and achieve redress of grievances, which can be achieved without the inclusion of an reformed and well balanced ISDS mechanism; s. Such a mechanism is not necessary in TTIP given the EU’s and the US’ developed legal systems; a state-to- state dispute settlement system and the use of national courts are the most appropriate tools to addressguarantees equal treatment of foreign and national investors and gives an effective investment protection and can be a useful instrument to increase direct foreign investment disputes;