5 Amendments of Sven SCHULZE related to 2016/2242(INI)
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas from a quantitative perspective, the take-up of the Youth Guarantee (YG) is encouraging in some Member States but implementation of integration services listed under the YG is often only partial – or the range of participants is too narrow – and dependent on the existing capacity and efficiency of public employment services (PES);
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas, although setting an ambitious political target creates a certain political dynamic for more effective employment of adolescents and young people, the use of the term ‘Youth Guarantee’ is seen as an exaggeration and as giving rise to false expectations and hopes;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas there must be an obligation for the aims of the Youth Guarantee to be made more quantifiable for Europe’s taxpayers and whereas reporting and the monitoring of measures taken must be improved; whereas this will enable a better data situation to be achieved;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Recital A c (new)
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas the EU should improve its marketing and advertising of socio- political measures to the target group in order to achieve better visibility for its actions among the people of the EU;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes with concern that Youth Employment initiative / ESF funds might replace national funding, with no subsequent net increase in funding to combat youth unemployment;