16 Amendments of Sven SCHULZE related to 2020/2012(INL)
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas a European approach to AI needs to include ethical aspects of AI to ensure that it is, robotics and related technologies needs to be in accordance with ethical principles reflecting our European values and principles to ensure that AI, robotics and related technologies are human- centric, enhances human well-being, the well-being of society and the environment, and fully respects EU fundamental rights and values;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the EU aimed to reduce annual road fatalities in the EU by 50% by 2020 compared to 2010, but, in view of stagnating progress, renewed its efforts in its Road Safety Policy Framework 2021 - 2030 - Next steps towards "Vision Zero"; whereas in this regard, AI, automation and other new technologies have a great potential to increase road safety by avoidingpotentially reducing the possibilities for human error;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas the production of ethically responsible, human-centred and technologically robust AI, robotics and related technologies in transport present European businesses, including SMEs, a business opportunity to become global leaders in this area; whereas such opportunity is particularly present, considering the current global leaders in this area produce technologies that are deemed insufficiently trustworthy and not adequately respecting ethical principles.
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
D b. whereas such new business opportunities may contribute to the recovery of the European industry after the current health and economic crisis; whereas such opportunities will create new jobs as the uptake of AI and related technologies has the potential to increase businesses' productivity levels and contribute to efficiency gains; whereas innovation programs in this area can enable regional clusters to thrive.
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Recital D c (new)
Recital D c (new)
D c. whereas such European approach to the development of AI, robotics and related technologies in transport has the potential to increase the global competitiveness and strategic autonomy of the European economy.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the potential of AI, robotics and related technologies for all autonomous means of road, rail, waterborne and air transport;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Moreover, highlights the potential of AI, robotics and related technologies to boost the modal shift and intermodality, as these technologies can contribute to finding the optimal combination of transport modes for the transport of goods and passengers
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Furthermore, stresses that AI, robotics and related technologies have the potential to make transport, logistics and traffic flows more efficient and to make all transport modes safer, smarter, and more environmentally friendly.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 – introductory part
Paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Stresses that the EU transport sector needs a clear ethical framework for achieving trustworthy AI, including safety, human autonomy and oversight, and liability aspects, which will be key to boosting investments in research and innovation, development of skills and the uptake of AI by SMEs, start-ups and businesses; and in this regard:
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 – point a
Paragraph 2 – point a
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
a a) calls on the Commission to provide for a clear framework of ethical principles for the development, deployment and use of AI, robotics and related technologies in the transport sector; any AI, robotics and related technologies in the transport sector shall be developed, deployed and used in accordance with those ethical principles.
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 – point b
Paragraph 2 – point b
b) recommends the establishment of guidelines for a harmonised risk classification of AI-enabled technologies in all modes of transport, covering vehicle functions allocated to humans and to AI, and clarifying responsibilities and requirements as regards safety;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 – point c
Paragraph 2 – point c
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recommends the development of an EU-wide trustworthy AI label for the automotive industry, which should provide for common and harmonised standardsethical standards for all modes of transport, including the automotive industry, on safety, technical robustness, privacy and transparency and for testing of AI-enabled vehicles and related products and services;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to explore the possibility of entrusting a relevant existing EU agency with enforcement and sanction mechanisms, so that actions can be takehow the existing instruments of supervision and control in the transport sector can be equipped and used to take action if an AI system used in transport violates fundamental rights or the European ethical and security framework;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to further support the development of trustworthy AI systems in order to render transport safer, more efficient, accessible, affordable and inclusive, including for persons with reduced mobility.