BETA

Activities of Felix REDA related to 2018/0106(COD)

Plenary speeches (1)

Protection of persons reporting on breaches of Union law (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0106(COD)

Amendments (26)

Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive
Citation 1
Having regard to Article 294(2) andthe Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 16, 19 (2), 33, 43, 50, 53(1), 62, 77 (2), 78, 79, 83(1), 91, 100, 103, 109, 114, 153, 157, 168, 169, 192, 207 and 325(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union andthereof and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 31 thereof,
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) Persons who work for an organisation or are in contact with it in the context of their work-related activities are often the first to know about threats or harm to the public interest which arise in this context. The purpose of this Directive is to create a climate of trust that enables whistleblowers to report observed or suspected breaches of law, wrongdoing and threats to the public interest. By ‘blowing the whistle’ they play a key role in exposing and preventing breaches of the law and in safeguarding the welfare of society. However, potential whistleblowers are often discouraged from reporting their concerns or suspicions for fear of retaliation.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) In certain policy areas, bBreaches of Union law may cause serious harm to the public interest, in the sense of creating significant risks for the welfare of society. Where weaknesses of enforcement have been identified in those areas, and whistleblowers are in a privileged position to disclose breaches, it is necessary to enhance enforcement by ensuring effective protection of whistleblowers from retaliation and introducingto ensure that there are effective reporting channels.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Accordingly, common minimum standards ensuring effective whistleblower protection should apply in those acts and policy areas where i) there is a need to strengthen enforcement; ii) under-reporting by whistleblowers is a key factor affecting enforcement, and iii) breaches of Union law cause serious harmundermine to the public interest.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) The importance of whistleblower protection in terms of preventing and deterring breaches of Union rules on transport safety which can endanger human lives has been already acknowledged in sectorial Union instruments on aviation safety38 and maritime transport safety39 , which provide for tailored measures of protection to whistleblowers as well as specific reporting channels. These instruments also include the protection from retaliation of the workers reporting on their own honest mistakes (so called ‘just culture’). It is necessary to complement and expand upon the existing elements of whistleblower protection in these two sectors as well as to provide such protection to enhance the enforcement of safety standards for other transport modes, namely road and railway transport. _________________ 38 Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 3 April 2014, on the reporting, analysis and follow-up of occurrences in civil aviation (OJ L 122, p. 18). 39 Directive 2013/54/EU, of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 20 November 2013, concerning certain flag State responsibilities for compliance with and enforcement of the Maritime Labour Convention (OJ L 329, p. 1), Directive 2009/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 23 April 2009, on port State control (OJ L 131, p. 57).
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Evidence-gathering, preventing, detecting and addressing environmental crimes and unlawful conduct or omissions as well as potential breaches against the protection of the environment remain a challenge and need to be reinforced as acknowledged in the Commission Communication "EU actions to improve environmental compliance and governance" of 18 January 201840 . Whilst whistleblower protection rules exist at present only in one sectorial instrument on environmental protection41 , the introduction of such protection appearis necessary to ensure effective enforcement of the Union environmental acquis, whose breaches can cause serious harm to the public interest with possible spill-over impacts across national borders. This is also relevant in cases where unsafe products can cause environmental harm. _________________ 40 COM(2018) 10 final. 41 Directive 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 12 June 2013, on safety of offshore oil and gas operations (OJ L 178, p. 66).
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) Enhancing the protection of whistleblowers would also favour preventing and deterring breaches of Euratom rules on nuclear safety, radiation protection and responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste and would be reinforce the enforcement of existing provisions of the revised Nuclear Safety Directive44 on the effective nuclear safety culture and, in particular, Article 8 b (2) (a), which requires, inter alia, that the competent regulatory authority establishes management systems which give due priority to nuclear safety and promote, at all levels of staff and management, the ability to question the effective delivery of relevant safety principles and practices and to report in a timely manner on safety issues. _________________ 44 Council Directive 2014/87/Euratom of 8 July 2014 amending Directive 2009/71/Euratom establishing a Community framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations (OJ L 219, 25.7.2014, p. 42–52).
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) Persons who report information, particularly about threats or harm to the public interest obtained in the context of their work- related activities, make use of their right to freedom of expression. The right to freedom of expression, enshrined in Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’) and in Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), encompasses freedom of information as well as media freedom and pluralism.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) Persons need specific legal protection where they acquire the information they report through their work-related activities and theand their decision to refpore run thet it results in a risk of work-related or other retaliation (for instance, for breaching the duty of confidentiality or loyaltyEU legislation on trade secrets). The underlying reason for providing them with protection is their position of economic vulnerability vis-à-vis the person on whom they de facto depend for work. When there is no such work-related power imbalance (for instance in the case of ordinary complainants or citizen bystanders) there is no need for protection against retaliationare reporting or on whom they de facto depend for work.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 42
(42) Provided the anonymity or confidentiality of the identity of the reporting person is ensured, it is up to each individual private and public legal entity to define the kind of reporting channels to set up, such as in person, by post, by physical complaint box(es), by telephone hotline or through an online platform (intranet or internet). However, reporting channels should not be limited to those amongst the tools, such as in-person reporting and complaint box(es), which do not guarantee anonymity nor confidentiality of the identity of the reporting person.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 62
(62) As a rule, reporting persons should first use the internal channels at their disposal and report to their employer. However, it may be the case that internal channels do not exist (in case of entities which are not under an obligation to establish such channels by virtue of this Directive or applicable national law) or that their use is not mandatory (which may be the case for persons who are not in an employment relationship), or that they were used but did not function properly (for instance the report was not dealt with diligently or within a reasonable timeframe, or no action was taken to address the breach of law despite the positive results of the enquiry).deleted
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 63
(63) In other cases, internal channels could not reasonably be expected to function properly, for instance, where the reporting persons have valid reasons to believe that they would suffer retaliation in connection with the reporting; that their confidentiality would not be protected; that the ultimate responsibility holder within the work-related context is involved in the breach; that the breach might be concealed; that evidence may be concealed or destroyed; that the effectiveness of investigative actions by competent authorities might be jeopardised or that urgent action is required (for instance because of an imminent risk of a substantial and specific danger to the life, health and safety of persons, or to the environment. In all such cases, persons reporting externally to the competent authorities and, where relevant, to bodies, offices or agencies of the Union shall be protected. Moreover, protection is also to be granted in cases where Union legislation allows for the reporting person to report directly to the competent national authorities or bodies, offices or agencies of the Union, for example in the context of fraud against the Union budget, prevention and detection of money laundering and terrorist financing or in the area of financial services.deleted
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 74
(74) Action taken against reporting persons outside the work-related context, through proceedings, for instance, related to defamation, breach of copyright, trade secrets, confidentiality and personal data protection, can also pose a serious deterrent to whistleblowing. The protection of whistleblowers provided for in this Directive shall prevail over Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council58 exempts reporting persons from the civil redress measures, procedures and remedies it provides for that, in case the alleged acquisition, use or disclosure of the trade secret was carried out for revealingcan reasonably be assumed to serve as proof of actual misconduct, wrongdoing or illegal activity, provided that the respondent acted for the purpose of protecting the general public interest. Also in other proceedings, reporting persons should be able to rely on having made a report or disclosure in accordance with this Directive as a defence. In such cases, the person initiating the proceedings should carry the burden to prove any intent on the part of the reporting person to violate the law. _________________ 58 Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure (OJ L 157, 15.6.2016, p. 1).
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
(a) breaches falling within the scope of the Union acts set out in the Annex (Part I and Part II) as regards, including but not limited to the following areas:
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. This Directive shall apply to reporting persons workingand facilitators in the private or public sector who acquired information on breaches in a work-related context including, at least, the following:
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘breaches’ means actual or potential unlawful activities, omissions or abuse of law relating to the Union acts and, notably in areas falling within the scope referred to in Article 1 and in the Annex;
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) ‘abuse of law’ means acts or omissions falling within the scope of Union law which do not appear to be unlawful in formal terms but defeat the object or the purpose pursued by the applicable rules or represent a danger or a potential danger to the public interest;
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Reporting channels, including digital mechanisms, and institutional arrangements shall provide for safe, secure, confidential and anonymous disclosures.
2018/09/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
a) establish independent and autonomous external reporting channels, which are both secure and ensure confidentiality, for receiving and handling information provided by the reporting person and allow for anonymous reporting;
2018/09/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 428 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. A reporting person shall qualify for protection under this Directive provided he or she has reasonable grounds to believe that the information reported was true at the time of reporting and that this information falls within the scope of this Directive, regardless of the reporting channel.
2018/09/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. A person reporting externallywho anonymously disclosed information that falls within the scope of this directive and whose identity was revealed shall also qualify for protection under this Ddirective where one of the following conditions is fulfilled :.
2018/09/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point a
a) he or she first reported internally but no appropriate action was taken in response to the report within the reasonable timeframe referred in Article 5;deleted
2018/09/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 437 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point b
b) internal reporting channels were not available for the reporting person or the reporting person could not reasonably be expected to be aware of the availability of such channels;deleted
2018/09/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 449 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. A person publicly disclosing information on breaches falling within the scope of this Directive shall qualify for protection under this Directive where: a) he or she first reported internally and/or externally in accordance with Chapters II and III and paragraph 2 of this Article, but no appropriate action was taken in response to the report within the timeframe referred to in Articles 6(2)(b) and 9(1)(b); or b) he or she could not reasonably be expected to use internal and/or external reporting channels due to imminent or manifest danger for the public interest, or to the particular circumstances of the case, or where there is a risk of irreversible damage.deleted
2018/09/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 494 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 a (new)
Article 16 a Rights of Persons Implicated Member States shall ensure that any findings or reports resulting from an assessment or an investigation of, or prompted by, one or more protected disclosure(s) does not unjustly prejudice any individual, whether directly or indirectly. The right to a fair hearing or trial shall also be fully respected.
2018/09/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 505 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 a (new)
Article 17 a No Waiver of Rights and Remedies The rights and remedies provided for under this Directive may not be waived or limited by any agreement, policy, form or condition of employment, including by any pre-dispute arbitration agreement. Any attempt to waive or limit these rights and remedies shall be considered void and unenforceable and may be subject to penalty or sanction.
2018/09/26
Committee: JURI