5 Amendments of Bernd KÖLMEL related to 2014/2041(BUD)
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes the Commissions intention to organise two meetings with the Expert Group of National Contacts at an estimated cost of EUR 70 000 in addition to two seminars of EGF implementing bodies in the Member States at a cost estimated at EUR 120 000; believes that while some of the proposed expenditure outlined by the Commission is necessary, believes that some of the proposed expenditure outlined above represents poor value for money;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Deeply regrets that the Commission did not duly analyse the effectiveness of the use of the crisis derogation criterion, especially taking into account that these EGF cases were not duly considered in the EGF framework review; regrets, however, that the results did not arrive in time to feed into the discussion on the new regulation for the EGF in 2014-2020, especially regarding the effectiveness of the use of the crisis derogation criterion; still believes that this should be taken into account for the future evaluation of the EGF; calls on the co-legislators to consider the reintroduction of this measure without delay, especially in the context of the social emergency situations in several Member StatesCalls on the Commission to produce a detailed analysis of the effectiveness of the use of the crisis derogation criterion;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 20 #
9a. Strongly believes that it is essential that Union expenditure is closely scrutinised on the basis of value for money; asks the Commission to outline clearly the added value in terms of tangible outcomes in creating a separate budget line for the EGF;