4 Amendments of Bernd KÖLMEL related to 2016/2242(INI)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the Youth Guarantee, as an investment in young people, is an example of budgeting driven by results; notes, however, findings from the European Court of Auditors' Special Report No 3/2015, which found no real figures for the cost of implementing the Youth Guarantee in each Member State, nor any robust estimation of costs for specific measures;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the Youth Guarantee and the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) have helped to significantly reduce the youth unemployment rate in the EU; notes that an unacceptably high 17.2% of young people in the EU28 are still unemployed1a; _________________ 1aAs of March 2017: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/29 95521/8002525/3-02052017-AP- EN.pdf/94b69232-83a9-4011-8c85- 1d4311215619
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the current level of funding, both from the EU budget and fromis set to be increased over the Mrember States, is insufficient to cover the needs involvedainder of the multiannual financial framework via an increased allocation in the mid-term review;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Highlights that the Youth Employment Initiative is already due to receive an additional EUR 1.2 billion from the EU budget over 2017-2020 as part of the mid-term review of the multiannual financial framework, EUR 500 million of which is proposed in 2017 via Draft Amending Budget 3/2017;