BETA

31 Amendments of Beatrix von STORCH related to 2016/0224(COD)

Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) This Regulation should apply to applications for international protection in a procedure where it is examined whether the applicants qualify as beneficiaries of international protection in accordance with Regulation (EU) No XXX/XXX (Qualification Regulation). In addition to the international protection, the Member States may also grant under their national law other national humanitarian statuses to those who do not qualify for the refugee status or subsidiary protection status. In order to streamline the procedures in Member States, the Member States should have the possibility to apply this Regulation also to applications for any kind of such other protection.
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) In the interests of a correct recognition of those persons in need of protection as refugees within the meaning of Article 1 of the Geneva Convention or as persons eligible for subsidiary protection, every applicant should have an effective access to the procedure, the opportunity to cooperate and properly communicate with the responsible authorities so as to present the relevant facts of his or her case and sufficient procedural guarantees to pursue his or her case throughout all stages of the procedure.
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) Access to the common procedure should be based on a three-step approach consisting of the making, registering and lodging of an application. Making an application is the first step that triggers the application of this Regulation. A third- country national or stateless person is considered to have made an application when expressing a wish to receive international protection from a Member State. Such a wish may be expressed in any form and the individual applicant need not necessarily use specific words such as international protection, or asylum or subsidiary protection. The defining element should be the expression by the third county national or the stateless person of a fear of persecution or serious harm upon return to his or her country of origin, or in the case of a stateless person, to his or her country of former habitual residence. In case of doubt whether a certain declaration may be construed as an application for international protection, the third-country national or stateless person should be expressly asked whether he or she wishes to receive international protection. The applicant should benefit from rights under this Regulation and Directive XXX/XXX/EU (Reception Conditions Directive)27 as soon as he or she makes an application. _________________ 27OJ L […], […], p. […]. 27 OJ L […], […], p. […].
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 428 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 63
(63) With respect to the withdrawal of refugee or subsidiary protection status, and in particular in view of the regular status review to be carried out on the basis of Regulation (EU) No XXX/XXX (Qualification Regulation), Member States should ensure that persons benefiting from international protection are duly informed of a possible reconsideration of their status and that they are given the opportunity to submit their point of view, within a reasonable time, by means of a written statement and in a personal interview, before the authorities can take a reasoned decision to withdraw their status.
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 431 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 64
(64) Decisions taken on an application for international protection, including the decisions concerning the explicit or implicit withdrawal of an application, and the decisions on the withdrawal of refugee or subsidiary protection status should be subject to an effective remedy before a court or tribunal in compliance with all requirements and conditions laid down in Article 47 of the Charter. To ensure the effectiveness of the procedure, the applicant should lodge his or her appeal within a set time-limit. For the applicant to be able to meet those time- limits and with a view to ensuring effective access to judicial review, he or she should be able to be assisted by an interpreter as well as be entitled to free legal assistance and representation.
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 488 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) beneficiary of subsidiary protection';deleted
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 489 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) 'subsidiary protection status';deleted
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 492 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) 'application for international protection' or 'application' means a request made by a third-country national or a stateless person for protection from a Member State, who can be understood as seeking refugee status or subsidiary protection status;
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 507 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) 'final decision' means a decision on whether or not a third-country national or stateless person is granted refugee status or subsidiary protection status by virtue of Regulation (EU) No XXX/XXX (Qualification Regulation), including a decision rejecting the application as inadmissible or a decision rejecting an application as explicitly withdrawn or abandoned and which can no longer be subject to an appeal procedure in the Member State concerned;
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 517 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) 'withdrawal of international protection' means the decision by a determining authority to revoke, end or refuse to renew refugee status or subsidiary protection status of a person;
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 591 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. The applicant shall inform the determining authority of the Member State in which he or she is required to be present of his or her place of residence or address or a telephone number where he or she may be reached by the determining authority or other responsible authorities. He or she shall immediately notify that determining authority of any changes. The applicant shall accept any communication at the most recent place of residence or address which he or she indicated accordingly, in particular when he or she lodges an application in accordance with Article 28.
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 628 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. The determining authority shall provide applicants with the services of an interpreter for submitting their case to the determining authority as well as to courts or tribunals whenever appropriate communication cannot be ensured without such services. The interpretation services shall be paid for from public funds unless the applicant has sufficient resources.
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 638 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The determining authority shallmay provide applicants with the opportunity to communicate with United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees or with any other organisation providing legal advice or other counselling to applicants in accordance with national law.
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 650 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The right to remain shall not constitute an entitlement to a residence permit and it shall not give the applicant the right to travel to the territory of other Member States without authorisation as referred to in Article 6 of Directive XXX/XXX/EU (Reception Conditions Directive).
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 799 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shallmay allow the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees:
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 801 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 shall also apply to an organisation which is working in the territory of the Member State concerned on behalf of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees pursuant to an agreement with that Member State.deleted
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 876 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. The medical examination shall be carried out by qualified medical professionals. Member States may designate the medical professionals who may carry out such medical examinations. Those medical examinations shall be paid for from public funds unless the applicant has sufficient resources.
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 888 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. Medical examinations may be used to determine the age of unaccompanied minors within the framework of the examination of an application where, following statements by the applicant or other relevant indications including a psychosocial assessment, there are doubts as to whether or not the applicant is under the age of 18. Where the result of the medical examination is not conclusive, or includes an age-range below 18 years, Member States shall assume that the applicant is a minor.
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 914 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 5
5. The refusal by the unaccompanied minors or their guardians to carry out the medical examination may only be considered as a rebuttable presumption that the applicant is not a minor and it shall not prevent the determining authority from taking a decision on the application for international protection.
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1134 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
2. Where an application is rejected as inadmissible, as unfounded with regard to refugee status or subsidiary protection status, as explicitly withdrawn or as abandoned, the reasons in fact and in law shall be stated in the decision. Information on how to challenge a decision refusing to grant international protection shall be given in writing, unless otherwise already provided to the applicant.
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1167 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
1. When examining an application on the merits, the determining authority shall take a decision on whether the applicant qualifies as a refugee and, if not, it shall determine whether the applicant is eligible for subsidiary protection in accordance with Regulation (EU) No XXX/XXX (Qualification Regulation).
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1515 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 2
2. Persons recognised as eligible for subsidiary protection have the right to an effective remedy against a decision considering an application unfounded in relation to refugee status.deleted
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1523 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Applicants shallmay lodge appeals against any decision referred to in paragraph 1:
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1533 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) within two weeks in the case of a decision rejecting an application as inadmissible or in the case of a decision rejecting an application as explicitly withdrawn or as abandoned, or in the case of a decision rejecting an application as unfounded or manifestly unfounded in relation to refugee or subsidiary protection status following an accelerated examination procedure or border procedure or while the applicant is held in detention;
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1539 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) within one month in the case of a decision rejecting an application as unfounded in relation to the refugee or subsidiary protection status if the examination is not accelerated or in the case of a decision withdrawing international protection.
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1548 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 2
2. A court or tribunal shall have the power to rule whether or not the applicant may remain on the territory of the Member State responsible, either upon the applicant’s request or acting ex officio, where the applicant's right to remain in the Member State is terminated as a consequence of any of the following categories of decisions: (a) a decision which considers an application to be manifestly unfounded or rejects the application as unfounded in relation to refugee or subsidiary protection status in the cases subject to an accelerated examination procedure or border procedure; (b) a decision which rejects an application as inadmissible pursuant to Article 36(1)(a) and (c); (c) a decision which rejects an application as explicitly withdrawn or abandoned in accordance with Article 38 or Article 39, respectively.deleted
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1556 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 3
3. A court or tribunal shall have the power to rule whether or not the applicant may remain on the territory of the Member State responsible provided that: (a) the applicant has the necessary interpretation, legal assistance and sufficient time to prepare the request and submit to the court or tribunal the arguments in favour of granting him or her the right to remain on the territory pending the outcome of the remedy; and (b) in the framework of the examination of a request to remain on the territory of the Member State responsible, the court or tribunal examines the decision refusing to grant international protection in terms of fact and law.deleted
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1560 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall allow the applicant to remain on their territory pending the outcome of the procedure to rule on whether or not the applicant may remain on the territory. That decision shall be taken within one month from the lodging of the appeal.deleted
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1564 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 5
5. An applicant who lodges a further appeal against a first or subsequent appeal decision shall not have a right to remain on the territory of the Member State unless a court or tribunal decides otherwise upon the applicant’s request or acting ex officio. That decision shall be taken within one month from the lodging of that further appeal.deleted
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1568 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) within six months in the case of a decision rejecting the application as unfounded in relation to refugee or subsidiary protection status if the examination is not accelerated or in the case of a decision withdrawing international protection;
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1570 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) within two months in the case of a decision rejecting an application as inadmissible or in the case of a decision rejecting an application as explicitly withdrawn or as abandoned or as unfounded or manifestly unfounded in relation to refugee or subsidiary protection status following an accelerated examination procedure or a border procedure or while the applicant is held in detention;
2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE