3 Amendments of Marcus PRETZELL related to 2016/2064(INI)
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that, while the SMEs window of the EFSI represwas intentded a good opportunity for start-ups, SMEs and mid- caps, there is abut that activity of this group of enterprises should be further promoted; taking note of the lack of big investment; emphasises, therefore, the need to improve the financing of infrastructure and innovation projects;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. UHaving taken note of the fact that certain projects across Member States raised suspicion that the project may not have been carried out within the objective of promotion, underlines the need to increase the transparency of EFSI operations and to improve information about projects and their, their requirement and their substantial quality to citizens and potential beneficiaries; points to the need to enhance the European Investment Project Portal (EIPP) and the European Investment Advisory Hub (EIAH) in order to establish a link with the real economy, give visibility to projects and provide high-quality technical assistance to potential promoters;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. WFundamentally welcomes the recent Commission proposal to extend EFSI beyond 2018 and to reinforce it in order to overcome the current investment gap in Europe and continue to mobilise private sector capital, these being crucial steps to ensure sustainable, but prefers to first elaborate an analysis of the real effect EFSI will have brought to the EU economical performance in terms of growth, competitiveness, quality job creation and social and territorial cohesion in Europe.