9 Amendments of Isabella ADINOLFI related to 2014/2228(INI)
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1.- Point (d) - Subpoint (i.)
Paragraph 1.- Point (d) - Subpoint (i.)
i.) to specify the role and the legal quality of the Regulatory Cooperation Council’, its powers and its findings, taking into consideration that any direct application of its recommendations for the relevant EU instances would imply a breach of the law- making procedures laid down in the Treaties therefore undermining the democratic process as well as the European public interest;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1.-Point (d) - Subpoint (ii.)
Paragraph 1.-Point (d) - Subpoint (ii.)
ii.) while the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) is an appropriate tool to protect investors and assure that investments are treated in a fair and non- discriminatory wa very critical tool that could pose threats to the Member States' sovereignty and their democratic capacity, to oversee that it doeis not undermincluded ine the capacity of European, national and local authorities to legislate their own policies, in particular social and environmental policies, and therefore respect the constitutional framework of the Member Statesagreement bearing also in mind that full protection is provided for by the current legal systems and procedures of the parties to the agreement;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1.- Point (e) - Subpoint (iii.)
Paragraph 1.- Point (e) - Subpoint (iii.)
iii.) while a certainwell-defined extent of confidentiality is necessary for effectivshould be deemed necessary in the negotiation process onf a trade agreement of such high economic and political importance, to continue its effort to render, to ensure that TTIP negotiations morwill always be transparent and accessible to the public, as European institutions should be at the forefront of promoting transparency;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point b
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) reaffirm that services with a strong cultural component will not be challenged by the TTIP agreement;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1.- Point (e) -subpoint (vi.)
Paragraph 1.- Point (e) -subpoint (vi.)
vi.) to swiftly create a mandatory transparency register to be used by all European institutions in order to have a full overview on the lobbying activities associated with the TTIP negotiations.;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1.- Point (e) -subpoint (vi.) -c- (new)
Paragraph 1.- Point (e) -subpoint (vi.) -c- (new)
vii.)c- to involve more citizens, NGOs, trade unions, associations, SMEs, local authorities in TTIP negotiation process and keep them regularly and fully informed on the state of negotiations;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1.- Point (e) -subpoint (vi.) -d- (new)
Paragraph 1.- Point (e) -subpoint (vi.) -d- (new)
vi.)d - to undertake, together with the relevant national authorities, all the necessary steps to have an informed and widespread public debate on TTIP and its implication for European and non- European citizens, with particular regard to developing countries.
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) clearly specify and state that cultural services and products should be considered, and therefore treated, differently from other commercial services and products, as provided for by the so-called cultural exception;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point f b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f b (new)
(fb) clarify which definition of culture, cultural services and products has been taken as reference in the negotiations;