BETA

6 Amendments of Isabella ADINOLFI related to 2015/2224(INI)

Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Invites the Member States to provide additional support and guidance to smaller and less developed localities and to micro enterprises which often have limited resources and capacity and for which the administrative burden and complexity related to the implementation of these tools may be overwhelming;
2015/12/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Regrets that, given the Commission’s failure to devise a common methodology, the wholly individualistic approach adopted by Member States in drawing up partnership agreements makes those agreements difficult to compare, in particular those parts relating to integrated territorial investments;
2015/12/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Considers that community-led local development, which represents a new form of partnership aimed at fostering social innovation, should contribute to the implementation of initiatives aimed at creating new, quality jobs, with the accent being placed on sustainable development and social inclusion;
2015/12/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Encourages capacity building and, awareness-raising among social and economic partners, as well as civil society stakeholders, and the active participation of those parties, so that as many partners as possible can propose CLLD strategies before the deadline for proposals (31 December 2017);
2015/12/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Highlights the fundamental importance of a non-discriminatory and transparent approach and of minimising potential conflicts of interest in interactions between individuals in the public and private sectors, to ensure the balance that is needed between effectiveness of the tool, simplification and transparency; welcomes, furthermore, the participation of a wide range of partners in LAGs; emphasises, however, that the provision whereby public authorities cannot hold more than 49% of voting rights in LAGs, as provided for in the current legislative framework, may in certain situations impede the implementation of CLLD since the other interest groups involved might lack the adequate expertise and resources; asks the Commission to closely monitor and assess the implementation of this provision in order to detect regions where these requirements can pose particular problems, and possibly provide future recommendations;
2015/12/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Asks for the abovementioned report to analyse whether a compulsory approach in the post-2020 cohesion policy legislation concerning CLLD and ITI would be desirable, with minimum earmarking for these instruments in operational programmes; in that sense, considers it essential to perform an in-depth assessment of the impact of those instruments, based on indicators that take into account not only the amount of the funds used, but also their effectiveness in the territories concerned and in the actions taken; proposes, alternatively, that the option of designing concrete incentives to stimulate Member States to implement CLLD and ITI be assessed;
2015/12/17
Committee: REGI