BETA

5 Amendments of Nicola CAPUTO related to 2018/2597(RSP)

Amendment 16 #

Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Believes that there is a need to focus on existing and new priorities: the circular economy, delivery of the 2030 climate and energy framework especially by encouraging innovation, the implementation of the Paris Agreement, the possible review of the EU adaptation strategy, the achievement of the objectives of the Nature Directives, the implementation of the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), within available financial resources; highlights that these priorities should be addressed through fine-tuning the financing per priority area;
2018/03/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 37 #

Paragraph 6
6. Agrees with the report that ‘after- LIFE’ plans are a positive improvement and that a systematic follow-up of all projects to identify best practices, cost- saving measures and a comprehensive customised support for the most promising ones could allow the replication/sustainability potential to further elaborate; notes that, in order to increase project transferability, it is essential to target obstacles preventing activities continuing after the project ends (such as lack of financial resources and capacity/human resources for investment planning), thereby developing a pipeline of projects for investment from other Union and private sector sources;
2018/03/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 53 #

Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Notes that, given that not all the originally envisaged simplification measures proposed have been introduced in the current LIFE Regulation, the scope and demand for simplification of LIFE procedures for grants remain, in particular for the submission of proposals and reporting;
2018/03/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 57 #

Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Notes that the national contact points need a stronger role to ensure a minimum level of service across Member States and a more proactive approach;
2018/03/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 66 #

Paragraph 13
13. Calls for further evidence of the effectiveness and efficiency of the projects, especially with regard to costs and savings, as theybenefits deriving from the good implementation of EU environment and climate action objectives, as the projects are expected to provide value for money;
2018/03/06
Committee: ENVI