Activities of Adam SZEJNFELD related to 2017/2003(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
European agenda for the collaborative economy - Online platforms and the Digital Single Market (debate) PL
Amendments (32)
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the collaborative economy is socially beneficial for EU citizens,
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Maintains that the collaborative economy, which covers activities which are gainful but are not economic activities pursued on a professional basis, should not be subject to additional administrative burdens; considers, on the other hand, that entities engaged on a professional basis in intermediary activities between providers and recipients of services in the context of the collaborative economy should be subject to generally applicable business laws;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Considers that there is no need for the Commission to adopt detailed regulations on the collaborative economy;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that, if developed in a responsible manner, the collaborative economy may creates significant opportunities for citizens and consumers, who benefit from enhanced competition, tailored services and lower prices;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Agrees that the collaborative economy could also generates new entrepreneurial opportunities, jobs and growth, and could play an important role in making the economic system not only more efficient, but also socially and environmentally sustainable;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Draws attention, at the same time, to the risk that establishing thresholds may create a disparity between micro and small businesses on the one side, and peers on the other; calls thereforeCalls for the legislation applicable to professional service providers to be revised in order to level the playing field among comparable categories of service providers and to remove unnecessary regulatory burdens;
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Believes that consumers should enjoy a high and effective level of protection, regardless of whether services are provided by professionals or peers; highlights, in particular, the importance of protecting consumers in peer-to-peer transactions; welcomes the Commission’s initiative to ensure the adequacy of consumer law and preventing abuse of the collaborative economy should be prevented;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission to further scrutinise EU legislation in order to reduce uncertainties concerning the rules applicable to collaborative business models and to assess whether new or amended rules are desirable;
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Points out the crucial importance of clarifying methods by which decisions based on algorithms are taken and of guaranteeing algorithm fairness; eEmphasises the need to verify the potential harm to privacy caused by big data, to assess the impact of data on different segments of society and to prevent discrimination; calls on the Commission to lay down effective criteria for developing algorithm accountability principles for information-based collaborative platforms;
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission for an ambitious enforcement framework, and to support the Member States in developing a strong culture of compliance and enforcement;
Amendment 257 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Is concerned about the difficulties that have emerged so far in relation to tax compliance and enforcement, despiteNotes the increased traceability of economic transactions via online platforms;
Amendment 278 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
Amendment 312 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
Amendment 354 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
Paragraph 37
37. Points out the importance of adequate competences and skills, in order to enable as many individuals as possible to play an active role in the collaborative economy; is of the opinion that the potential of the collaborative economy will be fully unleashed only through effective policies of social inclusion at EU level, starting with confident and critical use of ICT as a key competence for lifelong learning strategies;