Activities of Beata GOSIEWSKA related to 2014/2147(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
The fruit and vegetables sector since the 2007 reform (A8-0170/2015 - Nuno Melo) PL
Amendments (8)
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the 2007 reform aimed to provide greater flexibility, simplify the rules and strengthen the fruit and vegetable producer organisations (POs) by providing a wider range of tools to enable them to prevent and manage market risks and limit fluctuations in producers’ incomes;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital Aa (new)
Recital Aa (new)
A a. whereas the 2007 reform aimed to provide greater flexibility, simplify the rules and strengthen the fruit and vegetable producer organisations by providing them with a wider range of tools to enable them to prevent and manage market crises and to limit the fluctuations in producer revenues;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Points out that in view of the Russian embargo andit is absolutely necessary to improve crisis prevention and management instruments and to put greater emphasis on training and advisory services; stresses that the programme for emergency market measures for perishable fruit and vegetables adopted by the Commission in August and September 2014 confirm that an improvement in the crisis prevention and management instruments is absolutely necessarywas inadequate in terms of the losses incurred by producers;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
O. whereas the crisis caused by the Russian ban has had significant negative effects on the F&V sectorand in the future will have an effect on the F&V sector, and F&V producers have sustained the greatest losses; whereas the importance of the existence of strong POs to collectively deal with unexpected and adverse situations must be underlined;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O a (new)
Recital O a (new)
O a. regrets that the extraordinary measures programme adopted by the Commission in relation to perishable fruit and vegetables in EU Regulations No 1031/2014 and No 1371/2014 did not to any extent cover the losses incurred by the producers, and the funds in that respect reached only very few farmers in the EU Member States;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital P a (new)
Recital P a (new)
P a. Whereas the contingency reserve created out of the Common Agricultural Policy funds in the amount of over EUR 400 million was not used to mitigate the effects of the Russian ban, notwithstanding the circumstances justifying its use;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4a (new)
Paragraph 4a (new)
4 a. Points out that the level of producer organisations in the European Union varies and the organisations from the new Member States are not as numerous and strong as those in the old European Union Member States;
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Urges the Commission to identify the reasons for the low take-up of crisis prevention and management (CPM) instruments and to consider how the situation, including the contingency reserve created out of the Common Agricultural Policy funds, and to consider how the situation of individual farmers and producer organisations can be improved, taking into account examples of best practice among existing POs;