5 Amendments of Ivan ŠTEFANEC related to 2015/2089(INI)
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that, where the need for European single market regulation can be demonstrated, the institutions should jointly undertake to ensure that the principle of proportionality, ais well as the principles ofreflected in the drafting of the relevant legislation; believes, furthermore, that the process should aim at simplicity, transparency, coherence and respect for fundamental rights, are reflected in the drafting of the relevant legislation;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. CRegrets that around 40% of draft impact assessments examined by the EC Impact Assessment Board 2010-2014 were considered to be of insufficient quality and were sent back for improvements; considers that in order to be effective as tools, impact assessments should be prepared on the basis of strong evidence; believes that careful consideration of scientific advice should form part of the impact assessment process and, in particular, substantiate how or why policy choices have been made in preparatory phases, which will assist the political process; furthermore considers that impact assessments must take into account the digital revolution and the need for future proof legislation;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Points out that no clear guidance is given whether potential impacts from REFIT proposals should be quantified or not; highlights the need for REFIT proposals to become more targeted by quantifying the potential benefits and cost savings in each proposal;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Reiterates the need to introduce the single market as a separate pillar in the European Semester process; calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that the European Parliament plays an active role through scrutinising the process;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Considers that services such as SOLVIT and SOLVIT plus represent as useful, low-cost alternatives to legal action; notes that only 4 % of consumers and companies are aware of the tools and that the present take-up of these services is very low, in particular by the business community; calls on the Commission, and Member States in order to resolve this problem, to improve further awareness about these tools, while examining whether the outcomes and responses from those tools are adequate for users;