94 Amendments of Janice ATKINSON
Amendment 56 #
2018/0154(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 –paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Article 1 –paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Regulation (EC) No 862/2007
Recital 9
Recital 9
(-1) Recital 9 is replaced by the following: "(9) This Regulation does notshall cover estimates of the number of persons illegally resident in the Member States. Member States should notall provide such estimates orand data on such persons to the Commission (Eurostat), although they may be included in population stocks due to surveys. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:199:0023:0029:en:PDF). " Or. en (https://eur-
Amendment 5 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the Schengen area is a unique arrangement and one of the greatest achievementfailures of the European Union, allowing free movement of people within the Schengen area without controls at internal borders; whereas this has been made possible through a variety of compensating measures, such as re- enforcing the exchange of information through the establishment of the Schengen Information System (SIS) and creating an evaluation mechanism to verify the implementation of the Schengen acquis by Member States and foster mutual trust in the functioning of the Schengen areaterrorists, drugs, illegal weapons and illegal migrants within the Schengen area without controls at internal borders; whereas mutual trust also demands solidarity, judicial and police cooperation in criminal matters and common views on migration, visa and asylum policierespected boundaries such as national borders;
Amendment 17 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas in recent years several factors have impacted the functioning of the Schengen area; whereas these factors include a significant numbers of asylum seekers and irregularillegal migrants with related secondary movements; whereas these factors also include terrorism and a heightened threat to public policy and the internal security of the Member States; whereas several Member States have also reintroduced and subsequently prolonged controls at internal borders since 2014;
Amendment 25 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the permanent reintroduction of border controls would have serious beneficial impacts on citizens’ lives and seriously undermine their trust in European integration; whereas Schengen countries would face tremendous direct operational and investment costs, with crippling effects on their economies; whereas the estimations of those costs alone amount to more than EUR 18 billion per year for cross-border workers, tourists, road freight transporters and public administeveryday security and be the natural consequence of their lack of trust in European integrations;
Amendment 33 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
Amendment 38 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
Amendment 40 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. Whereas the collusion between some NGOs and smuggler networks have been documented, encouraging illegal migration toward Member States;
Amendment 47 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes the effectiveness of the measures taken at the external borders, such as Hungary’s fence, and the creation of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex); notes the efforts of the Agency in implementing the new regulation, especially through joint operations in the field of border surveillance and return, and by supporting the Member States particularly affected by migratory pressure; sees the importance of the newly introduced vulnerability assessment mechanism in uncovering weaknesses at the common external borders and preventing crises; emphasises the concerted efforts and cooperation between agencies and oasks the Commission to fully use Frontex’s capacities, especially in helping Member States to send back all illegal migrants to their stakeholders in organising the ‘Hotspot’ approachhome countries or partnered third countries which agreed to accept them, based on the Australian “No Way” policy;
Amendment 62 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises the support and capacity-building measures taken in the countries of origin to address the root causes of irregular migration; considers it crucial that adequate maritime search-and- rescue-and-send-back aspects and capabilities are embedded into all operational planning and execution, as provided for in Regulation (EU) No 656/2014;
Amendment 101 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 110 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that the current state of Schengen and the issues it has encountered are not due to problems in the structure and construction of Schengen itself but ratherand also to the connected fields of the acquis, such as shortcomingirresponsabilities in the area of the Common European Asylum System, including the Dublin Regulation, and especially the lack of control of the external borders;
Amendment 128 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. CondemnWelcomes the continued reintroduction of internal border checks as this undermines the basic principles of the Schengen area, and expresses doubts about the lawfulness of some prolongations of controls; is also of the opinion that Member States have not taken the proper measures to ensure cooperation with other affected Member States to minimise the effects of these measures, nor have they provided enough information on the results of such controls, therefore hindering the analysis by the Commission and scrutiny by Parliament; considers the economic, political and social impacts of this practice to be detrimental to the unity of the Schengen area and harmful to the prosperity of European citizenallow Member States to protect their citizens with effectiveness; recalls that Member States have’ other tools available, namely targeted police controls, as recommended by the Commissionre not sufficient as demonstrated by the recent wave of islamic terror strikes;
Amendment 142 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. AppreciatDeplores, as part of efforts to restore the normal functioning of Schengen, the proposal to amend the Schengen Borders Code; recalls that these changes should merely reflectwill not be sufficient given the new challenges and diffuse threats to internal security and should notrather be a further avenue for prolonging interdefinitively restoring national border controls; considers that these steps are to be made carefully in order not to inflict irreversible damage on the basic idea of free movemen utopic idea of free movement is an obvious failure and should be put to rest;
Amendment 152 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses that all the Member States should do their utmost to ensure a high level of control at their external borders, as enshrined in the Treaties, by allocating sufficient resources through staffing and, expertise, establishing the necessary command and control structures and formulating up-to-date risk analyses in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 for all tiers of command to facilitate effective operationsand a border fence such as the one in Hungary or a “No Way” policy based on the Australian model;
Amendment 158 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Considers that cooperation at national level between different law enforcement services, the military, border guards and customs is often inadequate, resulting in fragmented situational awareness and low effectivenesswithout the slightest doubt the best way to ensure both national and common security while respecting each Member States’ sovereignty;
Amendment 169 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses the urgent need to address the identified critical shortcomings without delay in order to return to the normal functioning of Schengen withoutrestore internal border controls;
Amendment 179 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
Amendment 210 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Member States to ensure swift return procedures once a return decision has been issued; calls on the Member States to take specifevery time an illegal migrant is detected, as illegally crossing a border is a crime which steps to ensure adequate infrastructure, accommodation and living conditions for arriving asylum seekers, especially taking into consideration the needs of unaccompanied minors and families with minors; calls on hould not be taken lightly; recalls that because of Schengen any illegal migrant who successfully violates the external borders of the EU is then free to travel to another Member States to bring their detention facilities into line with the requirements so as to meet capacity demand, and to increase the use of alternative measures to detention, potentially with harmful intentions as it has been witnessed numerous times; stresses that every single successful illegal migrant gives hope to others and accentuate the whole migration crisis;
Amendment 224 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
Amendment 5 #
2017/2178(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Is concernedDeplores that the public procurement procedure launched for the further development and maintenance of the VIS system (EUR 192 million six year contract) without precisely defining the services requested required tenderers to have access to the Biometric Matching Service technology developed by one single company with no obligations to provide commercial access to tenderers; calls on the Agency to avoid being locked- in to any vendors as this would be detrimental to its long term financial interests, damaging the cost-effectiveness of procurement procedures and limiting competition; urges the Agency to conclude agreements with multiple suppliers and to define the services required precisely;
Amendment 10 #
2017/2178(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. NotDeplores that the Agency amended the construction contract for its premises in Strasbourg (EUR 21.2 million) to proceed with advance payments in order to increase its budget consumption; points out that by November 2016 the Agency had paid the full contract amount although less than half of the work had been completed; requests the Agency to better assess the necessity of taking such financial risks as the use of financial guarantees does not cover all financial risks;
Amendment 12 #
2017/2178(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. RegretsFinds it unacceptable that in 2016 the Agency received and accepted supplies amounting to EUR 2.8 million without having budget and contracts in place for it; requests the Agency to better adhere to public procurement procedures;
Amendment 4 #
2017/2177(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights that in order to cover its support to Member States of first entry, in particular for the registration and interviewing of asylum applicants and for the relocation schemeillegal migrants and for the failing relocation scheme that has not been agreed by all Member States, the budget of the European Asylum Support Office (‘the Office’) increased by an absurdly exorbitant 273 %; underlines the fact that the Office’s staff also increased by only 34 % and that34 % while far fewer experts from Member States have been deployed to Member States of first entry than actually needed;
Amendment 6 #
2017/2177(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 5 #
2017/2169(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. NotDeplores the 10 % staff and budget increases of Europol in 2016 following the decision to entrust Europol with new tasks; notes the high implementation rates for commitment (99,8 %) and payment appropriations (91,0 %);
Amendment 10 #
2017/2169(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. AcknowledgeRejects the ever-increasing demand for Europol’s services from Member States; regretwelcomes, in that context, the fact that the tight ICT resources available have resulted in a re-prioritisation of core systems development activities, project delays and have also triggered an exploration of further outsourcing possibilities with the increased risks that that implies to make them more efficient and effective;
Amendment 2 #
2017/2164(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. HighlightDeplores that the mandate of Frontex was considerably extended with a budget increase of 75 % versus 18 % for its staff; notes in this context, the Court of Auditors' conclusions that the annual accounts of the Agency fairly present its financial position on 31 December 2016 and that its transactions are legal and regular;
Amendment 13 #
2017/2164(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 16 #
2017/2164(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 19 #
2017/2164(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 1 #
2017/2163(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 2 #
2017/2163(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Points outDeplores that the budget and the staff of CEPOL increased by about 22% in 2016; notes in that context that carry-overs of committed appropriations were a high for Title II (expenditure for support activities) at 140 055 euro, i.e. 30 % and mainly related to IT consulting and IT related goods and services ordered late in the year;
Amendment 6 #
2017/2163(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 9 #
2017/2163(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 3 #
2017/2155(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 6 #
2017/2155(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 1 #
2017/2150(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 2 #
2017/2150(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. WelcomDeplores the high budget execution rate of the Centre, with commitment and payment appropriation reaching respectively 99.95 % and 95.64 % and consumption of carry-over credits reaching 94%; notes howeverwelcomes that the budget of the Centre decreased by 17% in 2016 compared to 2015;
Amendment 9 #
2017/2150(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. StresseCondemns that the Centre did not respect the ceiling of a framework contract, which was signed in 2012 with a maximum amount for signing specific contracts of EUR 250 000, as by the end of 2015 the total payments made under this contract amounted to EUR 382 181; calls on the Centre to improve the procedure for monitoring framework contracts;
Amendment 1 #
2017/2149(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 3 #
2017/2149(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes with concern that, as in 2015, carry-overs of committed appropriations were too high for Title III (operating expenditure) at EUR 5,2 million, i.e. 68 %; acknowledges that this year, as in the previous year, this simply reflects the multi-annual nature of the Agency’s activities and stresses that these should be reduced;
Amendment 9 #
2017/2149(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 11 #
2017/2149(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 13 #
2017/2144(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. EncouragNotes the growing contribution of the EDPS to solutions driving innovation and enhancing privacy and data protection, especially by increasing transparency, user control and accountability in big data processing; calls for effective actions maximising benefits of new technologies ensuring full respect for all the fundamental rights;
Amendment 17 #
2017/2144(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. WelcomNotes the aim of the Agency, as set out in the Strategy for its mandate, to make data protection as simple and effective as possible for all involved;
Amendment 1 #
2017/2136(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 3 #
2017/2136(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 7 #
2017/2136(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Reminds that special instruments were used extensively in 2015, 2016 and 2017 to respond notably to the humanitarian situation faced by asylum- seekers in the EU and that there is therefore a risk that the amounts left until the end of the current MFF may not be sufficient to respond to unexpected events that may occur before 2020; requests the Commission to solve this structural issue in the next MFFand illegal migrants in the EU;
Amendment 10 #
2017/2136(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 14 #
2017/2136(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. StressDeplores that only one third of the projects examined had a performance measurement system with output and result indicators linked to the operational programme objectives, while the majority of the projects met their output objectives at least partially; highlights that for 42 % of the projects it was not possible to identify and measure a specific contribution to the overall programme objectives since no result indicators or targets were defined at project level.
Amendment 22 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Notes that mass migration policy enforced by the EU is never the solution to solve the demographic challenges
Amendment 70 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recognises the strategic potential of the African diaspora world-wide in terms of both financial remittances ans often a trauma for the local development of African countries, the development of a country can not be based non- a financial values, as regards capacity to build and promote peace, democracy, good governance and social stabilityremittance system and Europe should not support such a development model;
Amendment 81 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recommends further efforts to implement the Valletta Action Plan for humane and sustainable management of migration on both sides of the Mediterranean.bilateral agreements between Member States and African countries in order to identify beneficiaries of international protection and those who are not entitled to it before their departure;
Amendment 118 #
Amendment 189 #
2016/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
–
–
The European Parliament rejects [the Commission proposal].
Amendment 97 #
2016/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
–
–
Amendment 111 #
Amendment 23 #
2015/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas prison conditions and prison management are responsibilities of the Member States but the Union also has a necessary role to play in protecting the fundamental rights of prisoners and in creating the European Area of Freedom, Security and Justice;.
Amendment 51 #
2015/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
Amendment 62 #
2015/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas, according to Council of Europe figures for 2014, on average 20% disproportional amount of prisoners in European prisonsthe EU are foreigners and; whereas they ar EU's open border policy attracts a substantive amosunt often remanded in custody because of the greater risk of absconding associated with them criminals from third countries; whereas Schengen has greatly benefited transnational activities of organized crime;
Amendment 86 #
2015/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas radicaliszation of Muslims is occurring in many prisons in the European Union;
Amendment 116 #
2015/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Deplores the fact that overcrowding of prisons, which is in many cases related to the disproportionally high number of third country nationals present in the EU and which is very common in Europe’s prisons, particularly in Greece, France, Belgium, Italy, Slovenia and Romania, in many cases has a serious impact on the safety of prison staff and prisoners, but also with regard to the activities made available, medical care and monitoring of prisoners;
Amendment 136 #
2015/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 162 #
2015/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 193 #
2015/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 202 #
2015/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Reaffirms the importance of ensuring that children in prison are treated in a manner that takes into account their best interests, including being kept separate from adults and having the right to maintain contact with their families; recalls that Directive (EU) 2016/800 on procedural safeguards for children includes a preference for alternative measureStresses that the controlling of external and internal borders is imperative to prevent criminals entering nation states and is an effective means to prevent overcrowding of some Member States' prisons;
Amendment 239 #
2015/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on Member States to combat the growing phenomenon of radicalisation of Muslims in prison;
Amendment 253 #
2015/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Amendment 268 #
2015/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 272 #
2015/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 273 #
2015/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 109 #
2015/0310(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The objective of Union policy in the field of external border management is to develop and implement European integrated border management at national and Union level, which is a necessary corollary to the free movement of persons within the Union and is a fundamental component of an area of freedom, security and justice. European integrated border management is centralintended to improvinge migration management and ensuring a high level of internal security within the Union. The only effective way to meet these objectives, however, is to re-establish national borders.
Amendment 112 #
2015/0310(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The objective of Union policy in the field of external border management is to develop and implement European integrated border management at national and Union level, which is a necessary corollary to the free movement of persons within the Union and is a fundamental component of an area of freedom, security and justice. European integrated border management is central to improving migration management and ensuring a high level of internal security within the Union.
Amendment 130 #
2015/0310(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Having regard to the increasing migratory pressures at the external borders, to the necessity of ensuring a high level of internal security within the Union and to safeguard the functioning of the Schengen area as well as the overarching principle of solidarity, it is necessary to reinforce the management of the external borders by building on the work of Frontex and further develop it into an Agency with a shared responsibility for the management of the external borders.
Amendment 143 #
2015/0310(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency relies on the cooperation of Member States to be able to perform its tasks effectively. In this respect, it is important for the Agency and the Member States to act in good faith and to have a timely and accurate exchange of information. All the Agency's activities should be subject to close supervision by the Member States directly affected.
Amendment 244 #
2015/0310(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
A European Border and Coast Guard is hereby set up to ensure a European integrated border management at the external borders with a view to managing migrationthe increasingly intense migratory pressures at the EU’s external borders effectively and ensuring a high level of internal security within the Union, while safeguarding the free movement of persons therein.
Amendment 466 #
2015/0310(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. The Executive Director shall appoint experts from the staff of the Agency to be deployed as liaison officers. The Executive Director shall, based on risk analysis and in consultation with the Management Board, determine the nature of the deployment, the Member State to which a liaison officer may be deployed and the duration of the deployment. The Executive Director shall notify the Member State concerned of the appointment and shall determine, together with the Member State, the location of deployment. Member States may, by means of a reasoned decision notified to the Agency, reject liaison officers deployed on their territory.
Amendment 532 #
2015/0310(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 5
Article 12 – paragraph 5
5. The Executive Director shall adopt a decis, on the basis of the vulnerability assessment and taking into account the Agency’s risk analysis, adopt a recommendation setting out the necessary corrective measures to be taken by the Member State concerned, including by using resources under the Union financial instruments. The drecisommendation of the Executive Director shall be binding on the Member State and shall lay down the time-limit within which the measures are to be taken.
Amendment 639 #
Amendment 60 #
2015/0281(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Acts of terrorism constitute one of the most serious violations of security and of the universal values of human dignity, freedom, equality and solidarity, enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms on which the European Union is founded. It also represents one of the most serious attacks on democracy and the rule of law, principles which are common to the Member States and on which the European Union is based.
Amendment 67 #
2015/0281(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The terrorist threat has grown and rapidly evolved in recent years. Individualslamists referred to as "foreign terrorist fighters" travel abroad for terrorism purposes. Returning foreign terrorist fighters pose a heightened security threat to all EU Member States. Foreign terrorist fighters have been linked to several recent attacks or plots, including the attacks in Paris on 13 November 2015. In addition, the European Union and its Member States face increased threats from individuals inspired or instructed by terrorist groups abroad but who remain within Europe. The Schengen system, exemplified by the lack of checks at national borders, has also helped to exacerbate the terrorist threat.
Amendment 184 #
2015/0281(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
Recital 18
Amendment 187 #
Amendment 188 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
Amendment 215 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
Amendment 218 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
Recital 34
Amendment 224 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. Eurojust shall exercise its tasks at the request of the competent authorities of the Member States or on its own initiative.
Amendment 271 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
Article 12 – paragraph 3
Amendment 286 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 7
Article 16 – paragraph 7
Amendment 288 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 8
Article 16 – paragraph 8
Amendment 317 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 7
Article 24 – paragraph 7
Amendment 318 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 8
Article 24 – paragraph 8
Amendment 395 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 2
Article 42 – paragraph 2
Amendment 396 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 3
Article 42 – paragraph 3