Activities of Jonathan ARNOTT related to 2017/2044(BUD)
Plenary speeches (3)
2018 budgetary procedure (debate)
2018 budgetary procedure (debate)
General budget of the European Union for 2018 - all sections (debate)
Amendments (24)
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Expresses its oppolsitical support foron to the establishment of the European Solidarity Corps (ESC) and welcomerejects the legislative proposal put forward in this regard by the Commission; considers, however, that, pending a decision on the financing of the ESC and the adoption of the relevant regulation under the ordinary legislative procedure, that no financial provision should be entered for this purpose in the 2018 Budget or future budgets; decides, therefore, that relevant appropriations and redeployments, entered by the Commission in the Draft Budget 2018 (DB), should be for the moment reversed, as the decision on the 2018 Budget should not prejudge in any way the outcome of the legislative negotiations; remains fully committed to integrate the decision on ESC financing in next year’s budget immediately via an amending budget, in case the negotiations on the relevant regulation are not concluded before the end of the 2018 budgetary procedurereversed;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Is concerned by the fact that youth unemployment remains at unprecedented levels and is convinced that in order not to jeopardise the future of an entire generation of young Europeans, additional actions need to be undertaken; decides therefore to reinforce the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) beyond the level proposed by the Commission for 2018; stresses that such reinforcement should be considered as additional to the overall allocation that was politically endorsed for YEI in the context of the MFF mid-term revision, and not as a mere frontloading of that allocation in the 2018 Budget;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Regrets that, while preparing its position, Parliament has not been sufficiently informed about the budgetary impact of a possible political decision to extend the Facility for Refugees in Turkey (FRT); reiterates its longstanding position that new initiatives shall not be financed to the detriment of existing EU external projects; calls therefore on the Commission, in the event of the prolongation of the FRT, to propose its financing through fresh means; notes that the Heading 4 ceiling is vastly insufficient to provide a sustainable and effective response to the current external challenges, including the migration and refugee crisiscalls therefore on the Commission, to repeal the FRT and end all Union budgetary payments to Turkey;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses the importance of stimulating cooperative defence research in Europe for addressing key capability shortfalls at a time when international developments increasingly require Europe to step up itsOpposes defence research spending and rejects stepping up Union efforts on defence; fully supporrejects the increased allocation for the Preparatory Action on defence research; reiterates, nevertheless, its longstanding position that new initiatives should be financed through fresh appropriations and not at the expense of existing EU programmes;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28 a. Firmly believes that taxpayers’ money should not be used to support the rearing or breeding of bulls for fighting activities; stresses that breeding or rearing for these purposes should not be eligible for basic payments; takes note of the Commission’s executability letter which states that proposal cannot be implemented due to provisions in existing Union legislation; demands, therefore, in order to move this issue forward, proposals should be initiated to change the relevant pieces of legislation that the Commission cite as blocking this initiative;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
Paragraph 42
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
Paragraph 45
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
Paragraph 46
46. Considers that Council’s cuts do not reflect the real needs and therefore restores the DB for all Commission administrative expenditure, including administrative and research support expenditure in Headings 1 to 4s more needs to be done to reduce the overall Union budget;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
Paragraph 48
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49
Paragraph 49
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 53 a (new)
Paragraph 53 a (new)
53 a. Demands that, due to recent revelations regarding the travel expenditure of members of the Commission, there must be a higher degree of accountability by ensuring this information is made publically available;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 54
Paragraph 54
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 55
Paragraph 55
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 56
Paragraph 56
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 58
Paragraph 58
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 63 a (new)
Paragraph 63 a (new)
63 a. Firmly believes it was wrong for Political Groups to have been exempt from previous staff reduction targets and, furthermore, opposes the decision to allocate an extra 76 posts offset by these reductions from the administration; calls, therefore, for the number of posts for Political Groups to be reduced by 76 and a 5% reduction applied;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 76
Paragraph 76