BETA

4 Amendments of Luke Ming FLANAGAN related to 2017/2922(RSP)

Amendment 6 #

Recital E
E. whereas Article 11 requires a product information file to be maintained for every product placed on the market, to include data on any animal testing performed relating to the development and/or safety assessment of the cosmetic product or its ingredients;
2017/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 20 #

Paragraph 1
1. Notes that Europe has a thriving and innovative cosmetics sector that provides around two million jobs, and is the largest market for cosmetics products in the world; stresses that the EU ban on animal testing has not jeopardised the sector’s development, though even if this had not been the case, the ban on such tests is still justified;
2017/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 25 #

Paragraph 3
3. Believes that the EU’s landmark ban on animal testing for cosmetics sent a strong signal to the world about the value it attaches to animal protection, and has successfully shown that the phasing-out of animal testing for cosmetics isn't just possible, it has also proven to have little or no negative impact on the industry - the opposite in fact, as people react positively to the fact that the product they are using hasn't required any such animal suffering;
2017/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 30 #

Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates that animal testing can no longert be justified for cosmetics, and never could be;
2017/12/07
Committee: ENVI